The Importance of How JFK, Jr. Died

I’ll briefly deal with the character calling himself ‘Doubting Thomas’ (his email is, partly, ‘ElmerFudd’), because the subject he’s on about (not him) is actually important, i.e., disinfo agents, who they are, how to recognize them, what to believe and not believe, how limited hangout works, the sorry state of the alt media, and so forth. Fudd accuses me of being a disinfo agent. Well, okay. Fair enough, but the thing is that there are tells that point to ‘him’ being what he accuses me of. (Tells are my strong point and his prose is lousy with them.)

He (or it) has really looked into me. I’m talking deeply. He’s read at least two of my books and many of my blog posts. He’s read my Open Letters to MM and to James Corbett. (My exposing disinfo agents is probably why he’s here now, at least to an extent.) He’s watched my movie, Water Time (and actually uses it against me). Why, if I am a ‘spook’ and a liar, put in all those hours? Is it his job? Who pays him?

Of my detractors, MM is the only one who uses the term ‘spook’ to describe me, aside from ElmerFudd, which is not a coincidence IMO; it’s a ‘team’ term. If you look at MM’s attempts to discredit me you will find info only available to spooks themselves. Where I’ve lived but never mentioned being a good example. People I know. 

(Fudd is also dumb enough to bring up my photography as if it’s further evidence of my dishonesty. Do I even have to explain why this is an insult to your intelligence?)

Let’s think about this. Fudd is denying that MM is a disinfo psy op, using the issue of the JFK assassination as an important reason why I’m dirty and MM is clean. Thing is, you cannot separate MM’s claim that JFK faked his own death with his hilarious claim that virtually everyone who was ever assassinated faked their own assassinations (not an exaggeration), including all four of the Kennedy men (Joe in WW2, JFK, RFK, and… JFK, Jr…. wait… what about JFK, Jr.? I actually don’t think MM brings up this important subject. Why not? Another violent Kennedy death and MM doesn’t point at it as another way for the Kennedy’s to rule the world by telephone. (I’ll let lay the fact that none of MM’s Kennedy motives makes a lick of sense. He even admitted this to me in an email: When I asked for the motive he replied, ‘Do I have to explain everything?’)

Have you seen John Hankey’s exposé on the JFK, Jr. murder, almost certainly by the Bushes. If not, you should. This is maybe the best piece of citizen journalism of all time. Hankey proves beyond doubt that the plane crash was a PTB hit. As far as I know MM doesn’t bring it up; not a word. (If I’m wrong please quote where MM brings up Hankey’s little film, which is actually a crux of the Kennedy matter.)

Why not? Why not claim that John-John pulled the same maneuver as his dad and two uncles? Here’s why: MM (the PTB) don’t want to open that can of worms, since it is never talked about, in spite of all the evidence of murder (thanks to Hankey). Let’s just not go there, is what they’re thinking.

Plus, the idea that JFK, Jr. faked his death via a plane crash with his wife and her sister on board is even more absurd than the other MM Kennedy claims. (Why fake the deaths of three people, all of whom will now have to ‘disappear’?)

Make a list of MM’s ‘faked deaths’: there’s no one of note who is not on it. The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. as PTB disinfo agent likewise faked his death while he was an agent for the FBI? Yes, MM actually makes this claim. The list is endless.

But my real point: Since we know MM is a psy op, how would it make sense for me to be one too, given my public proofs that he is one? Proofs that have annoyed the team to the extent that they make absurd/irrelevant claims about me. How deeply do you have to think about this?

Anyone who buys all this MM utter crapola — and who has read my exposé on MM as Tavistock team — and who brings up my James Corbett letter as somehow related — is either mentally defective or a mole/troll working for them. 

Do you see that?

But the reason I burn the time bringing this up is to make the point that you should assume I am not telling you the truth, and do your own research. If you find me wrong on something, by all means tell us. But stick to facts, not nonsense like ‘what does his photography have to do with anything?’

What I have a knack for — which is what bugs them — is pointing out subject matters about which we are being lied to, matters that for some reason other ‘alt media’ people apparently don’t think of. Stuff no one else mentions. The Spacex fraud being a big one. (I think MM mentioned one time, in a brief, throw away sentence, that Spacex isn’t real. He then moved on and never returned to the subject. (I could be slightly wrong on this, but not by much.) This ‘put him on record’ but without doing any damage, not with the mountains of crapola he buries it in.

Given all the work I’ve done I prefer not to be thought of as a disinfo agent (as opposed to misinfo, which is accidental and does happen). But yes, assume I am mistaken in anything I say. Then look into it yourself. But if you don’t bother to do this, don’t insult me about it. Don’t waste my valued subscribers’ time.

A final word: If you read my Open Letters (MM and Corbett) and don’t clearly see that I’m telling important truths, you really shouldn’t be on this blog (this includes you, Fudd). It just doesn’t make sense. I mean, why waste your time? 

By the way, I’m viewing Hankey’s exposé again (my third time at least). Fucking brilliant work and so important. Watch it and ask yourself why MM (or Doubting Thomas/ElmerFudd) doesn’t mention it with respect to the Grand Kennedy Deception. If you’re going to reply to this, Fudd, answer that question first. Got that?

Allan

Addendum: Anyone thinking JFK faked his death — and assuming he/she wants to know the truth — has to read JFK and the Unspeakable. Everything is referenced; it’s all backed up. It’s not reasonably possible that MM’s theory is anything but crapola. Period. Kennedy was far from perfect as a human but he was turning toward peace so they had to get rid of him. This is how it went. (He  may  have  also  been  on  the  verge  of  spilling  the  beans  on  ‘the  alien  presence  on  earth’,  a  big  PTB  no-no.)

As I asked you to do last time, please click the link to his June 1963 speech. Now picture him as one of the PTB. Can you do it? 

Hey Fudd, thanks for the inspiration. Now go fuck yourself. Or just go away. Any more NLP from you will be a waste of time. 

Finally: If this post gets even one person to watch the Hankey film (and think about it), it will have been worth it.

Btw, it took a lot of searching to find the url to the Hankey film. I searched ‘John Hankey JFK Jr. assassinated’ (how much more specific could I get) and it was not listed in the first three pages. (Same problem with a bunch of my YT videos.) This is the degree to which we are being disinformed by the PTB. The motive of course is to keep the truth from you. ElmerFudd works for these people; I’d bet a valued possession on it. (Or he’s a mentally challenged ‘Miles Mathis’ fanboy. Take your pick.)