Thanks to those who have suggested solutions to my keyboard problem. Yes, of course, get a new board! I ordered one, plus mouse, for less than $40 and will be back on the blog as soon as they arrive, i.e., on August 16th. 
I actually have a lot to say, especially about Elon Musk, who and what he really is and why this is important, but a few other things, like the blockbuster film, Oppenheimer, and what it says and fails to even mention. 9I do have to actually see it.9999 Right, all those 9s were supposed to be parentheses.9
I don’t like Russel Brand but his recent tirade about Oppenheimer is worth a look. And I do wonder, still, about whether nukes are real, or at least why all the images of tests and at least some of those of the damage at Hiroshima and Nagasaki are fraudulent.
This would be a relevant time to discuss the subject of nukes, especially in the context of the Spacex mission frauds, which frauds that are in practice much more difficult to pull off.
I’ve had some new exchanges with ChatGPT that may be of interest, one in which I pretended I’m writing a fictional story about ‘an Elon Musk sort of character’ who turns out to be an actor whose companies are all fakes and meant to distract us. Pretty amusing that it didn’t realize I was describing the real Musk.
By the way, I figured out that most of the 14 subscribers I recently lost were right after my post proving 9with the help of AI9 beyond reasonable doubt that it is impossible to land boosters in the manner that Musk and the media claim. I find it interesting that not one of the unsubscribes had the class to tell me I am wrong about that. This implies that they didn’t even know why they bolted. This is the real problem, and what really bothers me.
allan
No matter how entertaining Oppenheimer might be, I guarantee it bends and twists history to an unrecognizable degree; I base this partially on how Nolan does the same to the actual laws of physics in Interstellar. 9None of the evidence for expanding space holds up to real scrutiny, i.e., there are no such things as black holes, and so on.9
Zuck is not happening. It’s Elon. Come on. For me, I can go on a Tute even if he’s a troll for the PTB. He’s, well, sexy. I’m not apologizing here. Allan is sexy too, with humor. Whether he agrees with me or not. The truth is the truth. All that other stuff is fodder to keep the expedition going. Hallelujah.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttEMYvpoR-k
The Cohen link is great, Cat. Always loved that rendition.
And on the subject of impossible vertical landings, remember to deplore William ‘Brad’ Pitt whose movie Ad Astra (2019) tries to cement this ridiculous scenario into our noggins.
I have just read a book about Oppenheimer. The guy comes across badly as far as I can tell, a real sociopath. Someone who considers the creation of nuclear weapons as “a great opportunity for mankind” can’t be right in the head. I always thought about him as a peculiar crook with some scientific talents but nothing more than that. It goes without saying that I will never watch a movie where he is presented as a hero.
I just read the Prometheus book 9too?9. not that interesting and I agree re OPPENHEIMER (I AM STUCK ON CAPS NOW BUT DO HAVE MY PARENS)> THE MOVIE WILL PROBABLY ONLY BE INTERESTING WHEN ITS LYING> JUST MY OPINION FOR NOW> I WILL VIEW IT WHEN I CAN ON MY MAC> NO HURRY>
This is a bit from a recent Forbes article re hologram technology:
Fast forward to early June 2022 when Shawn’s hardware & software company, Looking Glass Factory, launched the largest holographic display in the world – the Looking Glass 65”, 4X larger than any other group viewable 3D holographic display. I was one of the first to see it and was amazed by how such a flat screen could convey so much depth and 3D perspective. All of the company’s systems allow large groups of people to view up to 100 different perspectives of 3D, lifelike content at the same time. The holograms feel like they are floating out of the screen with realism and depth, and it’s experienced without a headset, eye-tracking, or 3D glasses.
The above is put together in a garage, not by DARPA over decades. Anyone saying ‘But I SAW it!’ might keep this in mind.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michellegreenwald/2022/06/29/will-holograms-be-the-next-big-media-format-theyre-not-the-holograms-you-remember/?sh=5b72192d31c4
Hi Allan
Can’t you get along with anyone … wait didn’t you ..lol
Stay level brother
Hey Alan
I’m a long time subscriber and I think you are wrong about Elon musk’s boosters.
There is one easy way to find out. Go to Boca chica and observe by yourself the boosters coming back. They are almost weekly landings.
Go therz and see it by yourself. Unless you will answer by saying they are provoking hallucinations in that spot ….
This is real.
If you are going to say I am wrong, explain how I am wrong. Do so point by point. 9like how they knew the wind to five decimal points in accuracy.9 As I have said several times, seeing is not necessarily believing, certainly not in this case.
Seriously, are you not listening? Did you not notice I theorize that they have perfected hologram technology? So what does ‘hallucination’ have to do with anything?
Allan you claim the last 14 unsubscribers did so after you proved [beyond the shadow of a doubt], that spacex was a fraud, that you can’t land boosters back at the launch site. You say they would not even engage the debate. I say they probably saw how you engaged me and just said its no use. I have been unsubscribed for over 5 years but still don’t miss any of your posts. What is the advantage of being a subscriber? Oh, and as far as sending money, no one is going to send money to someone that shouts down differing opinions. 9unless they agree with you9
You are a good example of your own bullshit, Brian. I didn’t say ‘shadow of a doubt’, I said ‘reasonable doubt,’ which is a whole different meaning. If you’re going to lie about someone, you might avoid doing it on the same page, where folks are apt to notice. Just a suggestion. Or show me where I shout you down. I recall using the same tone you do, plus I have warned about using ad hominems and illogical thinking here, which I would bet is the case with you, but not with me.
Yes I am a good example of myself, [by your definition bullshit] The way you come across with people that do not agree with your conclusions is not reasonable, you shout them down and try to run them off, going as far as calling them [me] an AI disinfo bot or something like that. I did not lie about you. An ad hominem attack? Please.
I did ask for an example of me shouting you down or using a tone that is different from yours and what a surprise you don’t come up with anything, a simple example of me shouting you down, just more hypocrisy, beyond a REASONABLE doubt. 9Even notice that when someone cannot answer you logically they will accuse you of shouting them down?9
Here is one i found in the boost back post “Did you read my questions yesterday? Yes? No? Either way you are an idiot.
QED.”
AW: YES, AFTER PATIENTLY ANSWERING A HALF DOZEN EXAMPLE OF NONSENSE I SAID WHAT EVERYONE WAS THINKING. WHY NOT QUOTE MY PATIENT ANSWERS TO YOUR CRAPOLA? THIS IS YOUR LAST COMMENT TODAY. I HAVE MANY TIMES ASKED THAT YOU DONT FILL MY BLOG WITH REPEATED COMMENTS, NOW I AM DONE WITH YOU.
Brian, you make sense. (Tu tienes razon.) Hard to argue with Weissbecker as 1. the only path one can take is his way or the highway. 2. He does not understand that there is a dialectic within any argument (la Coyuntura) and the space where the vectors meet,
as such change the size and intensity of the tension space across time, given the changing weight of the variables involved in all parts of the argument. All vectors need to be considered and weighted. All variables exist and have impact. He is great at travel writing and it would be a plus if he stuck to it. I for one would read every word. But he is def over his head in science or statistics. The descriptions are rambling with so many asides the center of the argument never holds. The rants are interesting to me because it’s a remnder to me that there are rambling ranters in the world. I wish he would return to travel writing. I loved it.
Geez, Mary, are you all right? 9The vectors of your prose are not conjoining within the parameters of your clavicle.9
same here but I stick around for the amusement and to remind myself
Galen Winsor long ago exposed the lies about plutonium.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8VvGw1tkT1Q&t=4s
Oppenheimer is one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen along with interstellar. Nolan must be a complete tool.
Gary McKinnon over 20 years ago exposed the secret space program when he hacked NASA. The $22 trillion stolen from U.S. taxpayers that Catherine Austin Fitts has so rigorously documented is likely being spent on interstellar tech, and all the DUMBS. That’s in addition to all the narco and human trafficking money.
We likely went to the moon well before the Apollo missions which were for public consumption as were hanging a few Nazis for show at Nuremberg after Germany lost WWII on paper but won it in reality. Humanity is being harvested by criminals human or possibly otherwise and a combination of both. It seems the socio-psychopaths are likely exploiting earth, and humanity for some cosmic gain. It’s beyond obvious that the COVID19 op,cand mRNA bioweaopons, and AI are all about reducing the population of humans, and creating genetically modified humanity to he controlled by AI.
It’s undetermined what UFO’s and their occupants are. They may be advanced human tech. Robert Sarbarker (sp?) was a student of Einsten, and a colleague of Oppenheimer. His name is all but erased from history, and he was poisoned to death after he revealed to a writer/reporter that the U.S. was in possession of extraterrestrial craft with very light insectoid like beings.
It’s quite possible all this insanity is a manifestation of demons summoned by Crowley,and Jack Parsons in the dessert southwest. That Patsons was involved with L. Ron Hubbard puts much of this cult insanity into perspective.
I agree with every word; even the last paragraph may very well be literally true. Thanks for the addition to this sorry ass post. 9Fitts is a hangout worth listening to but be careful with her too.9
I agree about Fitts. She sounds good on first listen but she omits quite a bit . I don’t listen to her anymore plus she networks with the usual regular shills. Haven’t these people learnt of ‘guilt by association’ yet?? That to me is one of the tells.
Fitts being a limited hangout seems quite absurd. To what end would someone put themselves through what she went through to expose that we taxpayers are missing $22 trillion?
I’ve never seen evidence Fitts is anything but credible, and savvy in how she presented her findings the impetus to uncover them which came from her discovery as assistant secretary of HUD that HUD was missing $35 billion. Without going into detail she even explains that her boss, Jack Kemp, was too compromised to do anything about it.
Fitts is limited in that she sticks to what she knows, what she proved, and had verified by an accounting team from Michigan State University, and she never speculates what the missing money is used for since she doesn’t know. Hangout she is not.
Because of my aphasia condition, I rarely comment even when I would like to. But now I will. I was in the marine corps stationed in Iwakuni Japan in 1960. I went to Hiroshima many times that year. Hiroshima was a robust modern city in 1960. No hint of radiation. I always wondered how could that be. I still wonder about that. Only 15 years after the bomb, how could that possibly be.
I forget which posts have the stuff about Hiroshima, etc. Anyone recall? I will look today and get back to you. Many of the photos are frauds, no doubt about that, but that is indirect proof.
https://blog.banditobooks.com/two-frauds-in-one/
That’s the address. Can’t send link my right click is messed up.
My brother in law, who worked for Boeing for a quarter of a century, possessed of several engineering degrees, thinks Space X is the bees’ knees, but he wasn’t going to take a look at Allan’s exegesis on the subject.
Just ask him how the boosters can hit a tiny target with no means of trajectory change. He might wake up in the middle of some night shouting ‘The Duke and that old guy are right!’
Your BIL is lying to himself and you (unless he just sweeps the floor or something like that), and does he cheer with the crowd, when something blows up?? (one of the big red flags!).
Look at the chaotic shambles SpaceX is at today, and this is without pondering on the high cross winds that would surely blow it’s landing off course every time – at least it’s more entertaining than that dog SciFi Interstaller (the best part being Michael Caine, tipping his hat to the BS fraud space calc’s – true to real life fraud) – > https://youtu.be/F3JTafTEDv0
Miles Mathis did a nice piece on the fraud that is Oppenheimer. However, Miles comes right back with disinfo on the Maui fires. He claims that Maui was all CGI, when it seems very clear it was DEW (like the California fires). The sections that burned were owned by the natives, not Oprah. Convenient, no? Mathis earns your trust with so many things, and then completely destroys it with something like his Maui paper. OT: My 35,000-entry etymology website is offline. I don’t have a webmaster, my software is about 18 years old, and supposedly it got attacked by malware. I’m hiring a webmaster, getting rid of any malware, and moving from ExpressionEngine to WordPress. I tried to avoid WP–they send everybody there, and you don’t want to ever be with the crowd on the grid. Whether I was intentionally attacked, who knows, but the website did need an upgrade.
LH “Miles” never touches the 4th IR.
https://twitter.com/samtripoli/status/1690174529706823681
Thanks. Miles Mathis can look at a Maui video like that and say it’s all CGI? What, it never happened? When it bears the imprints of all their agendas, and what they’ve done before?
yeah, as soon as I heard about the fires then looked at footage 9yesterday9 I was thinking DEW, like the California fires. I know Hawaii and there is no way tropical is going to burn like that. this is another one, folks and the guy in the link is probably right also re ‘retooling’ 9rebuilding9 Lahaina. I will have to checkout miles’s claim it is CGI, which of Course makes no sense at all. thanks for the link.
Came across this about the fires in Hawaii, puts a different perspective to what is being discussed.
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1690833566694100992?t=FdnxyVCPRSGh6DPKPSqSTg&s=09
Leeward side of the island is hot and dry. Not really what could be described as tropical. Add to that a drought and 60 to 80mph winds. Plus The video Mark Reeves posted. Its pretty obvious how those fires became so catastrophic.
I’m not sure why, but I have a certain fondness for Interstellar, despite it being full of all sorts of balderdash, e.g. “Love is the only thing that transcends dimensions of time and space” Sorry, even if one chooses to accept this goofiness, one must realize that if one very powerful human emotion can achieve such transcendence, then another very powerful emotion, e.g. hate, is just as likely to be able make the jump as well.
Interstellar is a movie that is remarkable for suggesting that much of what passes for science just might be the stuff of charlatanism. Here I have in mind the moment when Jessica Chastain’s character discovers that the critical computation of the supposed life’s work of the space program’s director, Dr. Mann, is incoherent nonsense.
Solving this this vital computation, or proof, is, or so we’re told, necessary to save mankind from doom. Well, it turns out that it never had a hope in hell of being solved. It was used as part of a bait and switch to get humans to join in, and, for some, to embark on what was practically a suicide mission.
Naturally, we’re also told in no uncertain terms that we peeps had to be duped, because, well, due to the way we are, there was just no other way to get us to do what needed to be done. So, sorry, deceit is essential to humanity saving projects of the sort the elites conjure up. Sounds like a big old apologia for the climate change lie, except that the folks behind that real life deception aren’t perpetrating it in order to advance anyone’s cause but their own. It almost goes without saying, which is why I’m saying it, that the the humanity saving project in Interstellar is driven by some unspecified change in Earth’s atmosphere that is causing blight in every food crop. Sounds a bit too close to the bogus climate change scenario for comfort, doesn’t it?
I would also be remiss if I didn’t point out that Interstellar goes out of its way, to an absurd degree, to present Chastain’s character as the hero of the story. Despite the sacrifice and great danger that her father makes going on the “interstellar” mission, somehow Murphy Cooper is the one portrayed as humanity’s savior. You can travel across the universe risking life and limb, but the one who plugs in in the critical data retrieved as part of the space mission gets all the glory. Go figure. Men are worth less (if not, necessarily, worthless) than women.
I didn’t even notice the plot holes you mention and which are — come to think — right on the money. The whole bullshit of the kid (then woman) hated her father for leaving 9to save the world, lol9 means she is a selfish little twat and didnt love him to begin with. I was too annoyed with the fairy tale physics to notice that. THANKS FOR THE REVIEW (WHEN I GET STUCK ON CAPS THE PARENS WORK!0 opps not this time. shit111
My pleasure.
If 6 were 9, I don’t mind…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vZuFq4CfRR8&pp=ygUXaWYgNiB3YXMgOSBqaW1pIGhlbmRyaXg%3D
I’m going to play devils advocate here, with the devil being advanced propulsion black budget technologies 6think dr Greer9. They would have the energy and guidance systems to bring those boosters, and rockets back to the pad with eloquent precision.
How about a multi layered psyop cake called Elon Musk?
Make everyone believe he is doing all this great stuff and cares about our “freedom” and helping humanity “evolve” with trans humanism, etc…
All the while creating a limited hangout that traps clear thinking skeptical people to call out the apparent bull shit of space x.
Divide and conquer.
Insert-thrust-repeat-land.
Now wouldn’t the use of advanced technologies be easier to pull off then massive holograms?
I suppose your idea is possible but keep in mind they are launching whatever sats they need up there in a different way, likely going up in a back engineered craft and throwing them out a window or whatever.
just a reminder of how little they think of your critical thinking, as if all the DUMBS are dug at a half inch per hour or whatever he claims:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ph8zN4bnc0&t=28s
I tried to leave a comment here yesterday but ran out of time. Mr Brand more or less covers the real issues over the movie. I haven’t seen it but I imagine it only gives half a story rather like the news we get. I will watch it though it will no doubt be through gritted teeth. My home county lives off nuclear power and nuclear submarine manufacturing as the key local employers. Whether the locals buy into the crap or not they certainly aren’t going to vote against the continuance of such manufacturing. Forgive no contribution to your fuel fund…the wife isn’t into conspiracy theories, true or not! I take or leave them as I see fit. Thanks for your ongoing efforts.
https://youtu.be/W1M133Qh2rY