I no longer take seriously the comment sections under my videos, having long ago accepted the fact that most (in some cases upwards of 90%) are from paid shills. You might well recall the young operative I briefly met who had 300 Facebook identities; you can bet that one reason for his multiple ‘sock puppet’ personas was to muddy the waters of online conversations that he is directed to, almost certainly via some spook-algorithm (see Big Al in the sidebar) that keeps a watchful eye on word-strings and/or selected persons (like me, say) the deemed ‘problematical.’
The only real annoyance I’ve been having since zero-ing in on Elon Musk and his Spacex launches as frauds is the lack of imagination/critical thinking demonstrated by a handful of people who keep emailing me with the same questions and dumb ass bald (unsupported) assertions; stuff that is dealt with more than once in my videos. (It has occurred to me that these emails likewise are from puppets but this seems unlikely – an inefficient use of State resources, given my negligible effect.)
Nevertheless, given the time and effort put into the videos (and this blog) I would think the minimum I’m owed to people who expect personal responses is that they actually watch my videos and read my blogs. That’s not too much to ask, IMO.
Also, I do expect at least the bare minimum understanding of the principles of logic, like what sufficient proof is in a cumulative argument, i.e., when presented with a list of observations/premises any one of which proves my point (fakery), those who cherry pick one ‘mistake’ (often it is nothing of the sort) and claim ‘victory’ is evidence of real ignorance: Even if the one thing is in error, any one of the other observations are sufficient to make the point.
You’ll understand this image if you keep reading.
For example, I had a guy who claimed to be in ‘military intelligence’ tell me that he is not a photography expert, therefore my photographic proofs don’t count. I could make a comment about ‘military intelligence’ here but – assuming the guy is reading this – I’ll only suggest he do a little research to understand what ‘light fall off’ is, and how it does prove that a light source is close by (which the sun isn’t). But even without that minimum of work on his part, the lack of thrusters on the ‘car in space’ platform does raise a serious issue with the Roadster’s tidy and perfect orbit (satellites need thrusters to avoid tumbling). And so forth…
For some reason these sorts of messages are more of an aggravation than the strange rate my subscription list appears to be shrinking. The upper image is from this morning and is typical of my daily tally.
How did these bailouts get subscribed in the first place? Seems unlikely they are via my videos, given the vid similarities to the points made in the blog; anyway, don’t they read at least one post before signing up?
Keep in mind what Elon says about tunnel digging.
Hey, I’m sorry. Most of you don’t need to hear this crap. From the smart emails I get I assume there are a fair percentage of you that understand that this MSF (Musk Space Fakery) has implications and possible implications that could be staggering. One that nags on me with every ‘TED’ talk or interview Elon does: They are grooming him for something major. Maybe even president (but not likely). Grooming him for something may be as important a ‘downstream result’ as the ‘space’ implications…
A couple things I noticed watching Elon’s phony self-effacing blabber: He’s now apparently preparing to dig tunnels; under L.A. to relieve traffic congestion, for example. There’s a big ‘tell’ here, one that reminds me of his other fraud, i.e., ‘space’… If you read Richard Sauder’s books and papers (he has some videos) you’ll find that for many decades underground boring technology has been way, way more advanced than Elon claims.
In a recent TED talk, Elon asserted that current tunnel-boring technology is so slow and expensive that his pet snail moves faster than the best methods available and that his goal is to tunnel faster than the snail. This is a really big and obvious tell that Elon is not who/what he seems. Tunneling technology is in fact so advanced – and has been since the 1960s and possibly earlier – that what are called DUMBS (Deep Underground Military Bases) are well known even to the casual researcher (not via CNN though!). Anyone wishing to debunk the DUMBs ‘conspiracy theory’ need only google ‘secret underground bases’ or anything like it and click ‘Images’; the sheer number of spectacular photos of underground facilities cancels the MSM’s desperate attempts to deride the ‘rumors.’
Sauder’s ‘paper trail’ of FOIA documents, plus the information and documents from insiders is all we need to understand that Musk’s ‘mission’ – whatever it is — cannot be real; the idea that the images you see here (and do go to ‘DUMBs + Images’) are all fake or misleading is flat ridiculous.
That Elon Musk is out of the loop on the truth of tunnel-boring technology is not believable. Therefore he is lying. Right? And if he isn’t lying, he’s a complete PTB stooge/actor. One or the other. Take your pick. Get my point and how it relates to his space crapola?
Some of you may recall the my road anecdote from a while back wherein I described a conversation with a trucker…. Here, I’ll paste it:
So I’m blabbing with this trucker, exchanging road tales. This fellow was an ex-Navy Seal, trucking with his wife and his dog, living on the road as I do, and I got an immediate good vibe from him. Quickest way to sum him up is that he reminded me of a more laid back version of Jesse Ventura.
After a bit he seemed to relax around me so I asked if he’d had any memorable experiences on the road and which he’d care to relate. There was a pause and I could tell he was thumbing through his mental memoir for something notable, perhaps also calculating how much of his time I was worth.
He told me that once he was on the road in the Washington, DC/Virginia area and got a call asking if he still took serious the ‘Top Secret’ clearance from his Navy Seal days (which were now a couple decades in the past). An odd question, he thought, but replied in the affirmative, adding a ‘Sir’ as punctuation.
He was directed to a Navy base where his rig was hitched to a trailer; he was given directions of where it was going. He was told that a vehicle would be tailing him in case of any ‘problem.’ Also, if he were pulled over by a State Trooper or the like, he should call a certain number and the Trooper problem would disappear. Under no circumstances was he to open the trailer he was hauling – he was given a key to the back but told not to use it unless told to do so.
His pay would be four times ‘normal’ (by the mile). His destination was at the dead end of a rural road somewhere in Virginia, at the base of a tree and scrub mountain. He was momentarily at a loss. The coordinates were correct but he was in the middle of nowhere. Suddenly by his rig a couple of ‘big spooky types’ appeared, seemingly out of thin air. There were no buildings or vehicles that he could see.
Sauder describes a vast complex in ‘Virginia, in the Appalachias,’ from a FOIA document.
Then, to his astonishment, the side of the mountain opened up. ‘There was a hillside, then suddenly a huge, gapping cavern,’ he told me. The spooky types suggested he exit the rig, which he did. One stayed with him while the other drove the rig and trailer into the cavern, which, he said, was ‘big enough to handle a submarine, a boomer’ (the biggest of the nuclear fleet).’
In a few minutes his rig was driven back out of the mountain, the loaded trailer having been discharged somewhere inside. My trucker acquaintance was paid in cash and told he could go now. Right now. He did and through the rearview watched as the cavern became the mountain-side again, trees, rocks, shrubs and all.
This is about the size my trucker friend described…
That, in brief, is his story. When asked if he would pinpoint the locale just described he just smiled, presumably taking his Top Secret clearance seriously.
In brief: One of the things I do as a writer and filmmaker is interview people. Based on fairly extensive experience I can say that my trucker acquaintance told me the truth as he remembered it. (end excerpt)
The real point being that Elon Musk is lying to us about tunneling in the same way as he lies about space: His activities are a smoke screen to blind us from reality.
Anyway, I put together a little video to make my point about the Musk ‘tunnel’ fraud. I hope you realize that since his ‘tunneling’ vision is a fraud, his ‘space’ vision is likewise so.
Allan
Regarding my subscription-rate dilemma: Recall that I asked those of you who find my blog of value to email me with ‘Yup’ in the subject box. I’ve gotten just under 300 responses. This is fine, given that I only do this blog to force myself to do better research (avoidance of embarrassing myself). If you didn’t do it before and feel like it now, please do so. (But don’t duplicate; I don’t want false encouragement.) And remember that the small PayPal contributions make my day when they appear in my Inbox.