Note: My links aren’t working today so I’m pasting in the urls to hyperlinks. (You can use your courser to find the links; they are there in the relevant text, just invisible.). I’ll also add recent photos to break the text-monotony.
A couple posts ago, Kimberlie (not Mellyrn) commented that she trusted Richard Grove of Tragedyandhope.com as a source of information. Okay. My problem here isn’t just that that Grove is almost certainly a mole and should therefore be carefully viewed as such, but it’s his meme of ‘intellectual self defense’ and ‘critical thinking’… given what you will read and view below, Grove brings hypocrisy to its highest, most disgusting level.
A while back I did a post titled ‘My List So Far’ (link: http://blog.banditobooks.com/my-list-so-far/) The matter of Richard A. Grove was pretty far down. (Run your courser over the words ‘My List So Far’ and you’ll understand the problem I’m having, and how to solve it. I’ll work on fixing this.)
I did make the mistake of ‘burying the lead,’ by not having my email exchange with Grove/Arbecheski up front. Their utter gall and hypocrisy still has me shaking my head (my teeth-grinding has abated). Cutting to the chase, you can scroll down to the list of Corbett-URLs in the first Grove email.
Anyway, with some minor futzing, here’s the whole mess (and I apologize in advance to those who have no interest in Grove or Tragedyandhope.com):
21) ‘Grove’
Refers to Richard Andrew Grove, about whom I’ve had recurring thoughts since I spent a week with him and (his now wife) Lisa Arbecheski in Connecticut just as I hit the road in the summer of 2014. I had corresponded with them since coming across their Tragedyandhope.com website, which I found to be a valuable asset in figuring out HTWRW. One reason I was so interested in Grove is his history as a ‘9/11 Whistle Blower.’ I was so impressed by Grove’s story that not only did I go out of my way to meet him, but contributed to his ‘truth’ efforts over $1,000 in cash and equipment.
I was suckered again. You want to really experience the extent to which I was suckered, go back to my first post of this blog (link is in bold), in July of 2014. I did a search for Rich’s name on this blog and found my condition was even worse than I remembered. I couldn’t seem to keep my trap shut about how great Rich is (plus his now-wife Lisa).
There is something very wrong with Richard Grove, although he’s quite good at what he does.
To those who are big fans of Tragedyandhope.com I have two things to say: I understand why you’re angry right now, and please bear with me.
First, as it turns out, Grove is not a ‘9/11 whistleblower.’ In response, Grove would no doubt say that he never claimed to be one, which may be true, but he’s also never corrected anyone who labels him thusly (and there are dozens). James Corbett, for instance. Grove is near the top of Corbett’s list (link) of 9/11 whistleblowers. (https://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20100305_911_whistleblowers.htm)Oh, but it also says ‘Wall Street whistleblower,’ which – they both would say – gets them off the lying hook. I say, Nahhhh.
Grove has a harrowing 9/11 story (link: https://archive.org/details/911_Whistleblower_Richard_Andrew_Grove__May2806) (which I’ve read, heard on podcasts and videos, and which he told to 
me over dinner at his house). It describes how he survived 9/11 only because he got caught in traffic on his way to a meeting on the 96th floor of WTC 1, and watched from his Porsche heading downtown as his colleagues died, the first explosion coming from on or near their floor. The meeting he was to attend was to ‘blow the whistle’ on financial shenanigans by the corporate giant he was working for. Thing is, nothing whatever came of his attempted whistleblowing, although he claims to still possess the documents that prove his ‘case,’ and which he was bringing to the ‘meeting’ (the scare quotes mean I’m quite sure the whole story is bullshit).
Addendum: For one thing – and it’s a biggie — of the five ‘colleagues’ supposedly killed that day, as of 2013 only one appeared on the Social Security Death Index, which lists anyone with a SS number who has died. I also looked into the names and found that none had an Internet footprint of any kind prior to 9/11. In my view, some or all of them are fictitious. Many of the ‘casualties of 9/11’ — especially at the WTC — are of this ilk. Completely fabricated. The real WTC death toll was probably a few hundred.
Why has he never made these documents public? This question becomes more urgent when taken in context: Grove strongly hints that he was lured to the WTC on 9/11 so he – along with his colleagues – would be killed, presumably for the information he possessed – the documents he’s never made public.
He also refuses to name the ‘executive’ who apparently saw to it that he would be in the WTC when it was destroyed, which means the exec had foreknowledge of the attacks.
Does this sound like a whistleblower? He sure sounds like one in this documentary, made by a buddy of his. (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHOujO-Qnlw)
This is how it works: Grove has a harrowing 9/11 story to tell and in fact has been in court on a whistleblowing case. So the ‘9/11 Whistleblower’ label sounds sort of right, if you don’t think about it.
No, his ‘official whistleblowing’ comes later, in a completely separate incident, having nothing to do with 9/11. (In spite of his harrowing, near death experience on 9/11, and his critical thinking skills, Grove went right back to corporate America for work, as if he hadn’t learned anything from 9/11. I guess he’s slow on the uptake…. Does R Grove seem like he’s slow on the uptake? Watch how he out-blabs me in this interview at his studio (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q0hk8gBf-0)
Here’s the story, the second one: In 2003, Richard Grove became a ‘Wall Street whistleblower,’ exposing still another major financial conspiracy, one that could cause – in his words – ‘a financial collapse.’ Wow, lots of whistles. The problem is that someone looked into Grove’s claims, which did go to court, as he claims in the documentary film (made by a buddy) 20/20 Hindsight; Censorship on the Frontline.
Quoting extensively from the court records, the exposé shows that virtually nothing Grove claims about his ‘whistleblowing’ is true, and the above film is pure crapola. (Here’s the URL: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/spin-job-the-odd-case-of-richard-andrew-grove/)
Addendum: The above link is all you really need to understand who Grove is.
I might also add that Grove claims that his behavior in the following court case events was ‘extremely naïve,’ re what to expect from corporate executives. Given his 9/11 story – how one exec tried to murder him (and did murder his ‘colleagues’) how could this be? Really. Think about this, especially if you’re a big fan of his. Given what (he says) happened to him on 9/11, how he be shocked when the Wall Street scumbags (in 2003) involved behaved badly?
A frame from 20/20 Hindsight.
I was tempted to paste a slew of passages here, but there was too much of an embarrassment of riches, so to speak. I didn’t know whether to quote Grove’s lies or the judge’s exposure of them. And besides, the only people who’d be interested in this stuff will be Grove fans – and these folks will want to read all of the above exposé. (Don’t give me shit until you’ve done so.)
A compromise. Two quotes from the judge, summing up what I learned about the actual ‘case’ of Grove’s whistleblowing:
‘There is, however, no evidence that Grove ever raised concerns with Legato or EMC management about the potential abuse of the product. That is, he never blew the whistle on this situation. Therefore, he did not engage in any protected activity in connection with this issue.”’ (page 25) [emphasis added]
So no whistleblowing, except in the story Grove tells, which is rife with his selfless motives of ‘doing the right thing,’ even adding, ‘Mother would be proud of me.’ (These quotes are from the interview linked above. (link) You can go to 1:51:30. Or listen to the whole thing, to understand how I was suckered by this very smart, very eloquent, very dishonest ‘truther.’)
His real motive was reflected here, in the judges words:
…it is clear from context that the complaints that Grove raised with Legato officials concerned his compensation rather than GAAP or any other perceived violations of securities laws.
Yeah, it was about money, not ‘doing the right thing.’ What the fuck else is new?
The above actually should not have come as a surprise to me, given a ‘tell’ that Grove exhibited within minutes of my arrival at his house in Connecticut. We went to his office/studio and sat down, whereupon I put a $100 bill on the table, saying words to the effect of ‘Keep up the good work.’ This was the 4th or 5th time I’d contributed, usually $100, via Paypal.
Grove quickly, reflexively (it appeared to me), snatched the bill from the table and stuffed it into his front jeans pocket. I don’t remember him thanking me; maybe he did, or maybe Lisa Arbecheski did; she was there too. I was in a state of minor shock at the subtext of his quick move — which shock I immediately repressed (but did not forget). After all, this was the guy who’d given up a promising Wall Street career to tell us all the truth, about 9/11, and especially, about critical thinking and ‘intellectual self defense.’ I didn’t want to think about the way he’d grabbed the money — as if instinctively preventing me from taking it back.
But back to Grove’s catastrophic loss in his court case (link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/spin-job-the-odd-case-of-richard-andrew-grove/): ‘Sure,’ you might say, as Grove himself surely would, ‘he was screwed by the ‘system.’ The easiest way to debunk this one is to quote Grove himself, when asked why he didn’t appeal the judge’s total rejection of his complaint:
FYI: I’m futzing with infrared imagery here.
(from the 20/20 Hindsight film)… ‘they’re not going to decide against a multi-billion dollar corporation, whose founder is the ambassador of Ireland to Ireland for president Bush at that time. Right? Or, I believe he might have stepped down at that time as an ambassador at that point, but he was still Bush buddies, and Bush was still in office, so… ‘(raises hands in air in defeat).” (part 6 – 5:46 – 6:11)
Notice that Grove says nothing about the evidence, nor does he accuse the judge of lying, which would have to be the case if Grove was a true ‘whistleblower.’ Instead, he inserts a red herring about some vague conflict of interest involving George Bush. He doesn’t even use money as an excuse (he represented himself, so there were no legal fees).
This infrared stuff will get more interesting when I learn post-processing.
The judge’s written decision is so adamant (that Grove is in effect a huckster) that by not appealing or at the very least by not being outraged, Grove gives the game away. He gave it a shot – suing for big bucks for wrongful termination — and blew it.
But let me get to the real point of how I know there is something… wrong… with Richard Grove. Those of you who have not read my ‘Open Letter to James Corbett’ (link: http://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-james-corbett/) will not ‘get’ my outrage. When I forwarded Grove my Letter a couple years ago, the response I got was this:
Allan,
I just want to point out, that James Corbett has covered both Sandy Hook and the Bean Town false flag…
https://www.corbettreport.com/sibel-edmonds-on-the-boston-bombing-the-us-roots-of-chechen-terrorism/
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-655-sibel-edmonds-on-the-boston-bombing/
https://www.corbettreport.com/boston-bombings-financial-pirates-quake-swarms/
https://www.corbettreport.com/the-fbi-fosters-funds-and-equips-american-terrorists/
(that link above is just a good example of his work on false flags)
https://www.corbettreport.com/the-sandy-hook-controversy-james-tracy-on-grtv/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIoiYLp6R8Y
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-578-dr-james-tracy-on-the-sandy-hook-controversy/
Also, on another subject…
https://www.corbettreport.com/tag/israel/
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-824-eva-bartlett-documents-the-struggle-of-the-palestinians/
https://www.corbettreport.com/tag/palestine/
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-967-new-world-next-week-with-james-evan-pilato/
Hope that helps clear things up further. [smiley face]
This is a guy who goes on and on about logical fallacies and critical thinking and intellectual self defense? Talk about red herrings! (None of the links is remotely relevant to the issue at hand; nothing even about 9/11, let alone the Pentagon) So I emailed this:
…You do all these podcasts on critical thinking and truth then claim to not understand my essays?…
If he doesn’t have any idea what hit the Pentagon then why did his video repeat TWENTY THREE times (including Mineta) that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
When I pointed this out, I got this:
I understood your post. You took James out of context, and now even with his clarifying what he believes about the Pentagon and 9/11, you choose to ignore his own statement [his ‘statement’ was that he ‘doesn’t know what hit the Pentagon’] and continue to misinterpret his words at some random event. [The ‘random event’ was his first appearance at a major ‘9/11 Truth’ symposium — in Kuala Lumpur. Meaning he carefully crafted his speech]
And:
Frankly, it makes me wonder about your critical thinking skills… perhaps you should take a break from this and re-visit with a clear hear and new perspective… not one that is angry and (seemingly) vindictive. [emphasis in the original]
And:
… so sell crazy someplace else cause i’m all stocked up here.
‘Crazy,’ huh? Okay. This is what’s known as ‘gaslighting’: trying to make someone doubt his sanity with deceit. About as low as you can go. But I merely repeated:
Please try again. Critical thinking. What does it MEAN that a truther repeats a monumental lie [Fl 77 hit the Pentagon] over and over for a half hour at a ‘truther’ conference. help me out here.
I reminded him of my contributions, which total over $1,000. So I get:
If you would like, I will refund your past contributions… just let me know what paypal account to send it to. [ditto]
I replied Yes, I want my money and my camera back, and gave the address and Paypal account. I never heard a word after that, no money, no camera. (When I gave him the Gopro camera I warned him that I’d need it back if something happened to the other two I have. This is in the interview we did.)
This of course further demonstrates a lack of character (money is more important than one’s word), but given the way he swiped up my $100 and stuffed it down his pants, I’m not surprised.
It gets worse: When I recently went to tragedyandhope.com to download something, I found I was banned from the site. Wait. My contributions were way more than what I needed for a lifetime membership to the ‘community.’ Why would I be banned? This is why: Grove didn’t want me posting anything embarrassing on the T&H forum; something like what I’ve written here. (Jay Dyer and Dr. Joseph Farrell have done the same thing, banning me from their sites. But at least they refunded my money. Funny thing about Dyer: He refunded my money even though he has no forum for me to embarrass him on. He just didn’t want me reading his stuff! (Jan Irvin and Simon Shack both banned me, too.)
Hey, I must be doing something right.
By the way, I originally emailed the Open Letter to James Corbett (link: http://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-james-corbett/) to Richard Grove, with a cc to Lisa Arbecheski. All the answers came from her, with the assurance that ‘Rich agrees’ (with whatever she says). What does this mean? This: Grove didn’t want to put the utter horseshit in the emails in his name, so he told Arbecheski to answer. Another giveaway of a lack of character and balls, plus disrespect towards his wife.
But what’s behind all this? My Open Letter plus Corbett’s reply means that Corbett is almost certainly a disinformation/limited hangout (LH) shill. That Grove replied as above – defending Corbett even with transparent logical fallacies — means he is one also. Corbett and Grove are thick as thieves on the Internet.
More evidence: Up until about 2013, Jan Irvin and Richard Grove were close associates, then something happened. Now they never mention each other. Before my Open Letter to Jan Irvin, Irvin emailed me that Grove was ‘a thief’ and ‘no good.’ Adding ‘no good’ to ‘a thief’… I wonder what that means? How much worse can someone get?
And one more, from none other than Simon Shack! (link: https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=462&start=30) (Yeah, I know, I ‘outed’ Simon as disinfo but, actually, the way he suddenly dropped accusing Grove himself as a disinfo agent… Notice how he had Grove on the ropes re Grove’s supposedly murdered colleagues, then suddenly shut up: He either realized or was told that they’re working for the same side.)
Folks, as I’ve pointed out before, the alt media is absolutely riddled with LH shills and moles, of various ‘depths,’ i.e., targeted at people of different levels of awareness. With the possible exception of the murderous pedophiles they work for, there is nothing lower than this manner of scumfuck.
#
Anyway, that’s my take on the matter of Richard A. Grove. I’ll try to have something more to say soon, if not tomorrow. Maybe I’ll look into the Chinese moon mission, as a couple of you have suggested.
By the way, I’m getting so much robo-spam to ‘moderate’ that I quit reviewing comments that aren’t regarding the current blog post. So if you want to post comments about old posts, make a comment about the current one first and I’ll okay you.
Allan
Anyone who wants to defend Grove, please begin with the email response to my Open Letter to Corbett, maybe explain how a critical thinking/intellectual self-defense advocate could defend Corbett’s repetition of Fl 77’s striking of the Pentagon based on Corbett’s ignorance of what hit the Pentagon.
.
Allan,
I am the person that introduced you to Richard Grove’s podcast and the tragedy and hope platform. At that time you were hanging out in Costa Rica (I believe), surfing, and kicking around beach bars – blowing tourist and ex-pats mind with all your conspiracy knowledge. You had disavowed American and promised to never return…we corresponded a few times and you and Rich started communicating independently for quite a while. Fast forward a bit – months at least- and you had a change of heart and decided to come back to the States….why? Anyway, you even came over to my house for dinner when you where in town visiting Rich/Lisa. You brought a bottle of rum, we grilled , it was a good time. Since then you have been spending years (literally) rehashing your same accusations and calling everyone a shill – you alone seem to be the only purely motivated individual. But in reality you’re just a grouchy bachelor whose only company that you seem to be able to keep is your dog… and seeing as how you had her on a pretty short leash at my house – even that may be debatable. You wrote an entire book about your inability to be able to maintain a solid relationship/friendship and yet no one can see that maybe all of these shills you are uprooting might actually just be the fact that your a crank? Seeing as how you’re knowledge of Rich and Lisa is gleaned from a weeks stay with them and some email correspondence I don’t consider you to have some sort of informed opinion. “But, he grabbed the $100 bill off the table so fast… I should of known better!!” – hahah, fuck, I have really enjoyed your fiction/loose nonfiction writings, that you consider this as some sort of tell tale sign of something afoot is hilarious. The fact that you’d actually write it down as evidence is comical. What would of been the proper etiquette when someone puts a $100 bill down on a table in front of you? Watch it for a few seconds? Ponder what you could buy with it? Who fucking cares!! Seems to me like you have a serious case of buyers remorse. After “DONATING” $1000 bucks to tragedy and hope and giving them a GoPro camera you want a refund? That’s not really how donating works bro! “All about the money”?? The dude produces hundreds of hours of content and gives them away FOR FREE!! God forbid he tries and sell some T-shirt’s to generate some funding. I cant believe that he would have the gall to try to offset his costs when he works basically for free… and has a wife and kids to support… the nerve!! Look at the list of people you’ve alienated – each and every one is a shill? Or COULD it be possible they don’t have time for your mind game bullshit and your harassing emails? In my opinion you don’t really seem to be contributing much to the truth movement (like – basically nothing – all opinions/no data-research-facts), you just seem to be sowing seeds of discord in efforts of self aggrandization. If anyone is doing the work of a shill it’s YOU! You’re not offering solutions to problems, nor doing the serious research leg work needed to actually produce original content. You’re shitting on everyone that you’ve ever had a disagreement with and calling them all spooks. Like, dude, YOU’RE the ex drug smuggler/Hollywood writer/author…. who doesn’t seemed to have ever had his past transgressions catch up with him In any sort of legal framing. You’ve just spent the past decades floating around carefree, living in your RV or some Montauk bungalow all off your savings from miami vice?…surfing waves and eating pineapples off your tropical property…. are you some sort of NARC plant? Are you being sent government checks from your CIA handlers? I don’t know, and I don’t care. Your sphere of influence is SMALL, and getting SMALLER. I do know I enjoyed your fiction but you seem like grouchy geezer who is clutching at a fistful if thin straws and hoping you’re audience goes with the flow. Surfs up! Here’s an idea for you… instead of shitting on everyone you disagree with in the truth community you actually promote the people who you do agree with and think are presenting valid arguments . This seems like divide and conquer to me, squabble amongst yourself while the power structure continues. Wish you the best, hang loose mongoose!
If this is the best a defender of Grove can do, I guess I’m doing all right. I may do a post about this comment, including this assholes email’s to me from back in 2011, for context on how utterly full of shit he is.
Allan i Hope you are scoring some tasty waves my friend! Happy New year too!
What you speak of in this update/post is as far as i can see/ascertain is most of the net/ web screwtube and fakebook, it is all monitored and tightly controlled by the gatekeepers on who are the chosen few… who gets a platform and who does not.
I take it as Ordo Ab Chao in full effect, however there is nothing new under the sun so should we be surprised?
it seems you seek allies(understandable because searching for truth can be lonely) yet the ones you choose uncannily and eventually expose themselves in secret in your confidence so in a way your doing your job successfully testing the spirits so to speak and bullseye! you hit your target… even though they were not a target to begin with!
We do a lot of praying and less surfing these days to stay sane, staying busy is good especially when in service to others.
Thank you for being of service to us your audience and sharing your tribulations with us, your time is valuable (so is everybody’s) however you go the extra mile by bothering to host your site and exposing the fakery and manipulation of Humanity by these think tanks closet societies, mystery schools, and their highly organized and well funded front men/women mouth pieces (we wont even address mainstream media) and shills- (Rat Baztardz)…… they will stand before god and be judged for what they are doing. all these things have to come to pass, and it will get worse before it gets better- thank god there are waves to surf!
stay excellent and thank you again and would be really nice to share waves with you someday before this mess eventually crashes to a halt.
may the spirit Guide us Allan Blessings and Aloha Brother.
I remember that interview. I was mesmerized. Hopefully, I’m gaining more discernment with age.
Thanks for posting again.
Prior to retirement 2014 I was a-snooze in sheeple land, oblivious. Many of the people you have analyzed and debunked I have never even read or heard of before including Richard Grove, (but I am learning). I do have an interest in the no planes theory and now believe that there were no planes. Hence a curiosity about how/who first exposed this occam’s razor revelation. I became familiar through James Fetzer, Simon Shack, Ace Baker, C.I.T.&Pilots for…&TruthandShadows (pentagon), and there was a guy (now deceased from Australia), maybe one of the first?.
Anyway the movie Sept Clues I thought very good and adjusting to Simon Shack as L.H. is a mind bender. How is it the someone exposing no planes etc , can be either controlled L.H. , or alternatively ordered (national security letters etc) to shut up, but allowed to continue with his other revelations. My brain hurts.
Also Jim Fetzer , who I have followed extensively since 2014, and whom I credit with my awareness of false flags and hoaxes, is controlled L.H.? His partisanship (for Trump or anyone else at this stage) is puzzling because the system is dead, there is no help from a dead system. Many people cling to hope in world leaders. Hope for corrupt evil people to as the saying goes “see the light” and turn from evil. Like Darth Vadar. And maybe that hope is not completely unrealistic, who knows. Also the hologram theory, cloaked missile, (which I have no proof for or against), is being used as distraction, confusion, a strawman to keep the focus off the no planes reality staring everyone in the face. Maybe he is just showing his flawed humanity, wishful thinking, hope when there is no hope, PHD in logic or not.
Even if it turns out missiles could be cloaked with a plane hologram, use of this argument without proof of this technology is used to discredit no planes and hide the truth.
I cannot get my head around the nuke thing. I see the deceptive video’s but do not know what to make of it at all. Do not swallow no nukes, need a lot more proof to make that pill go down.
As you say the more I learn, the less I know. Maybe that is the only answer available at present.
Me too, buddy.
Re outing LHs/shills/alt media moles all I can do is take it on a case by case basis until a certain critical mass is reached and I have to say, ‘The whole alt media is a PTB creation from the ground up.’ Are there exceptions? Of course. And should we listen to them for the valuable info they have to impart (to gain our trust)? Of course.
Should I be doing more? Of course. Is there any real point to anything I’m doing? Actually, yes, if one person gains some knowledge from my efforts. This is the way I feel this morning. tomorrow may be different.
Given that the topic of relativity comes up among the very first in Allan’s list, I would like to state that Stephen Crother has been absurdly wrong in his approach disproving SR.
I could show for anyone with a firm basic grasp of linear algebra the precise reason why.
The fundamental nature of Crother’s mistake and his subsequent silence has called into question not only his intellectual integrity but his intention against the public as well.
Not surprisingly, the YouTube channel partly promoting Crother’s work, SkyScholar, has recently contributed to the video collection of flat earth channel Globebusters.
Although it is a bad sign that Crothers didn’t answer your comment, you also did not answer several of my direct questions on SR. Also, if you’re going to defend SR you’ll have to do more than point out an algebraic error on his part. You need to debunk all his points — start with his vid at the Rational Physics conference in Europe. He only needs to be right about one thing to shoot down SR. You damn well know what i mean.
What are talking about, linking Sky Scholar with flat earth? Either provide links and evidence or shut your trap. Who are you anyway?
The video is on globebusters youtube channel by Dr. Pierre Marie Robitaille with special thanks.
I don’t need to defend SR, I am pointing out Crother’s claim as fraudulent.
Your ‘simple’ question was given simple answers at YouTube comment section.
Still not answering questions, are you, Sean?
Sean? Why are you using different names at different venues? who are you, really?
I am Jieqin Shang. Sean is my American nick name since its pronounciation is exactly the same as my family name.
Allan, I’ve been a happy subscriber for about a year and I’m really enjoying being able to read all your previous posts. Definitely educating and entertaining, thank you!
I wanted to read what you have to say about Crrow777 and Carlwood which you alluded to in your Lists post. How can I find it, I don’t see a Search option. An index of the titles would be so helpful. I’ve been reading two hours this morning just from today’s post. Love your work!
Just do this in your browser: “Crrow777” site:http://blog.banditobooks.com
This works for any keyword.
You’re an artist! Find the place you lost your balance and back track. That chaos can be a field of dreams or quicksand.
Some chewing gum for the prefrontal executive brain, Liminality ~
http://radiomisterioso.com/audio/George_Hansen_4_10_18.mp3
Never-ever forget reality is over rated!
Enjoy some youthful talent and beauty – and perhaps inspiration:
https://www.rollingvistas.com/
We miss you and want the conversation!
You’d think these brilliant “critical thinkers” (Corbett & Grove, which actually sounds like a good name for a criminal law firm) would understand basic “manipulation” psychology to stretch their con with no push back. Do a simple Mea Culpa, I was wrong about this (insert lie) my true believers, forgive me I’m only human and must admit I was wrong, classic groveling/humanizing. Works like a charm, shuts down attacks and they can move on with their sheckel grubbing shenanigans, and psyop. But no,.. deny, ignore, move on. Tell tale signs that something is not right. The $100 dollar grab so glad your brought that up again, totally forgot, yep that’s a whopper of Tell. Grove was slicker than the slickest, slimiest Wall Street Snake, now he’s T shirt Tom down in the bunker banking the bucks. Alternate Truth, Truthers whatever is another Alternate Reality.
Yeah, I was thinking exactly that. Both Grove and Corbett should have said ‘Fuck, I was dumb to say that’ or the like and shut me up. Ego.
Robo-Spam equals Big Al
RS=BA
Question: what is lower than LH shill and mole scumfucks, with whom the alt media is absolutely riddled?
Answer: the murderous pedophiles they work for !
Allan, Thank you! Ask and ye shall receive! This is exactly what I needed to furthering the opening of my eyes! Snakes like Richard and Lisa abound in this world!
As I said in my email, Kimberlie: Good for you for not fighting the evidence. (It’s okay to question it, but don’t fight it.) For a bit of enlightenment on how serious the denial factor is, go to the video linked below (posted by someone else) and notice the thumbs ups and downs. Almost 3 to 1 for the downs. And the comments reflect the same phenomenon. In the interview I exposed Corbett and to a lessor extent Grove, put out all the evidence and few ‘truth’ types accepted it. It’s like I’ve said before: Try changing even on mind. Ain’t easy.
Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwIEaL5Wz-I
Allan~ Thank you again, SIR! I know I am not the only one who has been deceived – and how easily one can be taken in simply based on how many thumbs up/down for any given ‘conspiracy theory’ out there (the crowd mentality “well, if there’s 50 against and 3 for”, choosing to go with the majority)…., one must be extremely diligent to cover all bases – known and unknown – before entering the Trust and Truth arena.
THANK YOU, thank you for your instrumental part in revealing the truth!! Please accept my humble apology for misdirecting and pointing your readers to trust that NO GOOD THIEF Richard Grove and those like him. (Better to know the truth late than never)!
Very kind regards,
~Kimberlie