First, I really appreciate the (so far) reactions to my ‘Get Along?’ post. I was worried that it would come across as self-indulgent, as in who cares about my (continuing) run ins with scumbags? And no one pointed out the obvious: How could I be so stupid in buying a boat to begin with, given the state of the world and my dearth of funds? (All my gold, silver, and rare coins went into the thing, along with most of my cash cache.) Anyway, the post script to this is my offer to the right person out there who might like to take over ownership of Lady, a sort of partnership.
Like her? No, I ain’t giving up, but check the P.S..
Oh, an amusing note re Chesapeake Yachts and the ’60 gallons of toxic waste’ in my bilge issue: I went through their emails to me and came across some good ones. From October 9th:
‘The boat has 2-3 gallons of water & fuel in the bilge & we can have our guy pump it out on confirmation.’
My estimate of 5 to 8 gallons was pretty high, as you can see. A few days after the 9th they started in with the ’60 gallons’, etc. Let this be a lesson to any thieves and liars out there. If there is more than one of you involved, you gotta stay on the same page! Otherwise you get caught!
The boat has been with them since September 23rd, right? Out of the water so nothing could leak in. And if there was somehow a leak in the fuel tanks, it would certainly have been noticeable by October 9th, when they tell me that it’s 2-3 gallons. (Emails are great when it comes to catching liars, isn’t it? They always forget what lies they’ve told: Archive your emails, folks!)
Last night. I love the clear nights up here, and shoot time lapses most nights. With luck (and aside from the good stuff I already got) someday I’ll show you something really wild.
Anyway, I’ll keep you apprised of new developments. It will be interesting to see how they explain the above email (there is another which even names the guy who checked the bilge, Bruce, who found all well down there).
#
One of my methods how figuring out HTWRW is to bite the bullet and take in the most obvious of the PTB propaganda minions, looking for clues as to What’s Coming Next. Given my interest in real science, I thought I’d look at Stephen Hawking’s Brief Answers to the Big Questions, maybe see what this most obvious of the state assets has to say about HTWRW. On a certain level it’s an hilarious read (I actually did it via audio book, to save on eye strain).
I should first mention that the… original ‘Stephen Hawking’— the physicist from the 1960s and ‘70s, but not the one who wrote A Brief History of Time – died in the mid-1980s (and hence could not have written the book) and was replaced by a… literal puppet.
Long-time subscribers might remember my posts from a few years ago on this subject, and how it led me to ‘Miles Mathis,’ the ‘alt media’ psy op I exposed with my Open Letters to him. It was good old Miles who alerted me to the Hawking fraud, in one of his dangles to truth seekers. Although I can’t vouch for everything Miles tells us about Hawking, his photographic analysis is pretty much spot on; plus there’s the impossibility that an ALS sufferer living almost half a century longer than the first runner up.
The Hawking medical miracle sort of reminds me of the Mars Rovers’ (Opportunity and Spirit) battery performances (they were off-the-shelf), which – and this is in spite of near constant far-below zero temperatures — somehow kept their charges for years longer than expected, with Opportunity 14 years more than normal battery life.
Mars Rover entry. Without powerful thrusters, this would not maintain stability and would burn up.
Addendum: The evidence that the Mars missions were as fraudulent as Apollo is borderline inarguable, IMO. My favorites are the ‘Mars’ photos, but the cumulative evidence is summed up well by RichplanetTV. (Yes, I seem to have exposed Rich Hall and his sidekick Andrew Johnson as well. (Someone emailed me saying How dare I accuse Andrew, such a great and honest guy and so forth. Be great if this person explained my email back and forth with Johnson.)
Also, I do love it when NASA’s compartmentalization backfires, as when an astronaut recently blurted that landings on Mars cannot be done via parachutes, since Mars’s atmosphere is so thin (1% of earth’s). I did archive this but haven’t been able to locate it. No matter, since any astro-physicist would tell you the same, in spite of NASA’s dumb ass videos purporting to show the entry with a parachute (plus an innately unstable craft design that could not keep the heat shield into the wind, as shown in the video).
The mission press conference is hilarious, by the way, with the mission chief (who looks like an Elvis impersonator) not knowing any tech details about the entry, landing, or anything else. It has to be seen to be believed. (Go to 34:40 in for the best moments.)
Brief Answers to the Big Questions is unique for a book-length science ‘lesson,’in that there was not one ‘question’
With 1% of earth’s air pressure, parachutes would be useless.
whose answer wasn’t demonstrable hogwash. For reasons of attention span I’ll just give you some of the real howlers (at some point I had to cease being outraged).
Runaway climate change is the biggest threat to humanity. ‘Hawking’ can’t keep his trap shut on this one.
I know most of you are ahead of me here, but here is a good rebuttal of this continuing chunk of manure. ‘Hawking’ even warns that if the ice keeps melting we will soon have the climate of Venus — 800 degree temps and sulphuric acid rain. Wow. Sulphuric acid rain. Are you scared yet? Keep in mind that this is coming from ‘The World’s Smartest Man!’ (according to South Park). And he does go on and on and on, managing to slip in references to the coming climate catastrophe as he lies about other issues.
Addendum: You want a good example of how the various PTB agencies/arms stick together on this issue? Okay. To find a link to the above documentary I searched YT via the film’s title, which is ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle,’ and guess what? I had to scroll through three pages of titles (CNN, etc.) to find it. And it has almost a million views (with 15,000 thumbs ups).
How did we get here? Darwinian random mutation/natural selection.
This lemming was supposedly photoed on Mars. You believe that, I have 60 gallons of bilge you can pump for me. (Or something…)
The future? We are running out of space so we must go to other worlds.
The doomsday clock is closer to midnight because of the election of Donald Trump. (As if we’d be better off with Hilary.)
Wait. Hold on. I’ve got a stack of 3×5 cards with notes on Big Questions but frankly I don’t have it in me to go too deep. I’d really prefer to get back to Origins and the bits of truth I know about cosmology, rather than listing the lies of a PTB puppet.
That said, ‘Hawking’s’ ramblings about UFOs and time travel (he manages to see them as one and the same) are fairly amusing, depending on your sense of humor. After some utter double talk about ‘space-time’, we get (my comments in bold):
[Begin quote] ‘If time travel were possible why hasn’t someone come back from the future to tell us how to do it? Even if there were sound reasons to keep us in ignorance, human nature being what it is, it’s difficult to believe that someone wouldn’t show off and tell us poor, benighted peasants the secret of time travel. There ought to be a logical fallacy named after Hawking here: ‘Assuming one knows the thought processes of ‘alien’ species (humans from a million years hence would count as ‘aliens’).’ His ‘it’s difficult to believe’ phrase also qualifies this as an ‘Argument from incredulity’ fallacy.
Of course, some people claim that we already have been visited from the future; they would say that UFOs are from the future and that governments are involved in a gigantic conspiracy to cover them up, and keep for themselves the scientific knowledge these visitors bring. Pay attention to how he pays this off…
All I can say is that if governments are hiding something they are doing a poor job of extracting information from the aliens. Need I say it?: If the governments are covering them up, then he (‘Hawking’) wouldn’t know about it, would he? So how would he know they are doing a poor job of anything? A child could see this as fallacious reasoning.
I’m pretty skeptical of conspiracy theories as I believe the cock-up theory is more likely. I could not find ‘cock-up’ in the dictionary but let’s assume it means ‘incompetence.’ This bald assertion, although predictable, is
Really, folks: Click the link and listen to this clown re the Mars mission.
meaningless.
Reports of UFOs cannot all be caused by extra-terrestrials because they are mutually contradictory. Whoa! How are ‘they’ mutually contradictory? This is just pure nonsense. ‘Not even wrong.’ But once you admit that some are mistakes or hallucinations isn’t it more probable that they all are rather than we are being visited by people from the future or the other side of the galaxy? How does this follow? Because he says so, and he is ‘The World’s Smartest Man’? He might as well say, ‘If I made a mistake that means everyone else did too.’ I forget which logical fallacy this is, aside from Red Herring. If they really want to colonize the earth or warn us of some danger they’ve been rather ineffective. Obviously: How would he know these are the only motives visiting aliens might have? Another Red Herring, plus ‘incredulity’, plus… the whole book is like this, if you listen carefully. [end quote]
The above drivel comes right after ‘Hawking’ tells us how an advanced civilization might very well warp ‘space-time’ (more to come) and either travel in time or voyage between galaxies in the blink of an eye. So, even aside from my comments, this passage makes no sense.
This is the The World’s Smartest Man?
Regarding ‘Hawking’s’ theories of black holes, the big bang, and the expanding universe, please view my video from four years ago:
In Big Questions Hawking goes on and on about black holes. If you believe in black holes, please take a moment to view another of my Steve Crothers videos. This little (2 minutes) interview with Steve is likewise a QED on the subject of the big bang; it shows that black holes and big bangs are… wait for it… ‘mutually exclusive’ (as ‘Hawking’ would tell us).
If you want to look into what is behind the fraud of the big bang, this little video will get you started.
Okay, I’m on a roll, so one more thing. ‘Hawking’ goes on about the standard model of our solar system’s formation, and holy shit is he wrong. Wrong not only by the laws of physics but by common sense. The theory is this: Billions of years ago there was a vast cloud of gas, virtaully all hydrogen. Out there in space. What happens next? The cloud collapses into itself, gets smaller and smaller, until… the heat of the gravitational collapse starts a hydrogen chain reaction and… our sun is born.
Miles Mathis photo analysis of the two (or more) ‘Hawkings.’ Gotta give MM credit on this one. Proves that psy ops can come in handy.
One problem with this is that it breaks the three laws of thermodynamics (mainly that a system cannot do work on itself), but rather than getting technical, let’s think about it. What happens to the gas that comes out if you open a soda bottle in a small room? Well, the gas expands and fills the room. That’s just common sense, right? I mean if you think about it.
It should be the same with hydrogen gas out in space. (It really is the same, but go ahead and look it up.) Imagine this is the cloud of hydrogen atoms that ‘Hawking’ says will become our sun, via ‘collapse’.
Each H2 atom represents a tiny bit of gravity, right? The bit of gravity could be shown as a point with little arrows directed inwards towards its center, right?
The total gravity in a gas cloud is the sum of each atom’s gravity…
The huge amount of gravity (claimed by MS scientists) represented by the ‘cloud’ of hydrogen (or any gas) is merely the sum of all the individual atoms’ gravity. Examine the diagram and look where the arrows are pointing: There is no concerted force toward some theoretical ‘center’ of the cloud. Is there?
One more time (because this is vital): There would be no theoretical or literal ‘point’ at the center of the cloud toward which all the hydrogen atoms would be attracted. Would there?
There is no force acting on any atom to move it in concert with the others.
Addendum: Ooops. I went off on a bit of a tangent and forgot to point out that a gas cloud in space would naturally expand, like the soda bottle gas in a room (then a bigger room, etc.) Do you not find it incredible that 98% of the Ph.d-ed physicists in the world do not see this simple truth (about our own solar system)?
The only thing collapsing here is all of modern cosmology. And the guy (me) pointing it out flunked high school algebra. (Perhaps significantly, I got the highest grade in the history of my school on the New York State geometry Regents exam. How do you figure?)
It really does appear that ‘Stephen Hawking,’ the past, real, one, or the puppet who replaced him, was/is wrong about… everything. Scary, no?
Enough! (I know: I claimed I’d explain why ‘space-time’ makes no sense. Didn’t get around to it.)
Allan
For those interested in cosmology I highly recommend two sources . The Electric Universe (of course) and Pierre-Marie Robitaille, whose YT channel is Sky Scholar. The latter will show you why the standard model of our dear sun is likewise hogwash. He really will. You just have to give him an open-minded chance, and pay attention.
Almost forgot. The boat deal. If anyone lives near a great piece of water and wants to share ownership in Lady, get in touch via email. I have an offer you can’t…
#
Wait. One more from ‘Hawking.’ When asked ‘If you had a party for time travelers, would anyone show up?’
His answer: ‘In 2009 at my college I held a party for time travelers. To make sure only real time travelers would show up I didn’t send out invitations until the after the party. On the day of the party I sat hoping but no one came.’
He then goes on that this is somehow evidence that Einstein’s general theory of relativity is correct. Riiight! But picture how it went: Sending out invitations after he knows no one showed up. If you picture his actual claimed behavior… he’s either a fool or a liar.
Most of the book is like this: He’s hoping you are a fool and won’t actually think about what he’s saying.
“What happens to the gas that comes out if you open a soda bottle in a small room? Well, the gas expands and fills the room. That’s just common sense, right? I mean if you think about it. It should be the same with hydrogen gas out in space.”
“a gas cloud in space would naturally expand, like the soda bottle gas in a room”
The CO2, from the soda, expands because the molecules have kinetic energy (i.e. they are in motion). This kinetic energy, of the molecules, is a component of their thermal energy. (The main process, however, is not expansion but diffusion. Soon after effervescing from the soda, the CO2 molecules will attain thermal equilibrium with the air in the room, and, from then, just move randomly through the room. Nevertheless, I believe it is correct to state that the CO2 expands, at least initially, and so I’ll treat that side of the comparison as valid.)
I haven’t perceived the reason to assume that the “gas cloud in space” is at room temperature. Generally, things in space can be at pretty low temperatures. If the gas cloud were at absolute zero, it would have no thermal energy, and, hence, no kinetic energy – in the sense that the molecules would all be in the same rest frame, motionless relative to each other.
It is reasonable to assume that gravity affects very small objects, in addition to the large ones of which we are directly aware. (I suspect GB would like to herd me into a quantum mechanical fog, at this juncture, and so I’ll just admit I wouldn’t be able to extricate myself.) So, each molecule will be attracted to each and every other molecule. These attractive forces accelerate the molecules towards each other, in accordance with Newton’s second law. Since, when we magicked them into position, they were pretty well at rest with respect to each other, the acceleration is significant (in the sense of it mattering, not in the sense of being large). A property of gravity is that its force increases as the separation decreases. (It’s an inverse square relationship, like light fall-off.) Thus, the molecules move into a tighter clump at an increasing rate (actually, with increasing acceleration).
I don’t see a problem with claiming that the molecules converge onto some “theoretical centre”, unless it is to be understood that each and every molecule follows a direct path toward that centre. I take it as a macroscopic observation: the clump is shrinking around its centre. (If you had a group of folk connect a bungee rope to each other individual, asked them to stand as far apart as they comfortably could, and then oiled the floor, I think you’d soon see them converge towards a point, even if an advance prediction of that point was not obvious.)
OK, molecules will collide, and, hence, bounce off each other. Were all collisions completely elastic, this would prevent the contraction of the clump. What we’d see is gravitational potential energy being converted into kinetic energy, and then, as the molecules reverse direction after colliding, the kinetic energy being converted back into the original amount of gravitational potential energy, i.e. the molecules attaining their original separation before they come to rest and commence being drawn in again.
Molecular collisions are not perfectly elastic, though. According to the equipartition theorem, in the course of multiple collisions, the molecules’ kinetic energies will become shared equally amongst all their degrees of freedom. That’s rather a technical assertion (and not very well expressed, sorry), but you’ll have noticed that, when you smash a baseball, the impact causes your bat to vibrate. Thus, it’s an everyday experience that some energy gets lost from the bodies’ linear motion. (I am not suggesting the baseball smash is a demonstration of equipartition, though.) So, after they have collided, the molecules do not have sufficient kinetic energy (because some of it has been transferred into vibrational and rotational modes) to reattain their original separation.
As the cloud contracts further, and the molecules gain greater and greater kinetic energy (though never enough to allow the cloud to expand again) their vibrational and rotational energies commensurately increase, too. Collectively, the energy in all these modes is what we know as thermal energy. Colloquially, the gas cloud gets hotter.
In case this helps anyone: a vacuum does not suck; it simply doesn’t push back.
Thanks Allan…
Lots of true stuff here to continue to learn
This is really you at your very best
Humorous but shockingly informative 👍
> Most of the book is like this: He’s hoping you are a fool and won’t actually think about what he’s saying.
Yes, there is a certain percentage of fools who don’t really even think about anything.
But IMHO there is a second category. Those who realize there is something wrong here. But the “pain” of being out-of-sync with groupthink causes them so much pain that they drop it as quickly as possible. And that human characteristic did (IMHO) not evolve via “Darwinian evolution”, but selective breeding. A prerequisite for high-IQ slaves.
That does it. Is anyone else tired of these lame ass avatars? This one, the floating dingleberry, is so gay I could gripe about it. I’ll try and at least get the one I’m used to back since I forgot the usual email address that gets that one eyed freak back in action. I still have to wonder though how the avatar generator new I had a single eye in the middle of my head.
In the ways of modern forced education, algebra is the cart before the horse of interest. I too failed algebra in high school but recovered with a B in college level electronics math. Until I became interested in electronics there was no motive to decipher what was at that time useless. Geometry carries an intrinsic visual beauty that doesn’t require a prerequisite purpose to be appreciated and understood.
Hi Allan I just read both of yournew Post’s the boat story is a horror story,
I was really lucky with my boat as it was moored on a fresh water canal
Its only small but hey I only paid £400 pounds for it mostly in installments
Also when I gave the previous owner the last £100 he let me off by £30 as it needed a new fuel connector, however that was the Honda price and I managed to get one from another boater for £10
The total price was £370 I don’t know how that translates into dollars
However I’ve had to spend a lot of extra dough on it obviously plus I’m being threatened with eviction if I don’t pay the back dated licence fees
I’m not worried as it can take 6 months before they can seize boat .
Anyways one thing that occurred to me is that even if the bilge pump is not working
Its possible to buy a battery powered hand held pump it has two big round batteries which you can get here in Poundland for you guessed it £ 1 a bit like your dollar store
Forget theBS about hazardous waste if you decant it into a steel oil drum you can burn it off out in the desert or anywhere because global warming is a scam, co 2 or carbon is not dangerous I recently heard about a famous astronomer who said that the only thing that can raise the earth’s temperature is the sun which is going thru a cooling cycle ..BTW the Madeline McCann story is total fake the photos of her are made up of several different children who also vanished or were murdered.
The McCann’s never were doctors and are high ranking Freemasons.
The Portuguese detective’s book on the case is also fraudulent and he’s one of the cabal and they’ve made a lot of money out of it.Anyways gotta sort out my woodburner will tell you what I know about the bentwaters event which has some truth and lies regards James
Thanks, James, and yes, if you have inside knowledge about Bentwaters, I’d love to hear it.
OK Allan I’ll tell you the truth on this one I’m a time traveler and I bought the spaceship from some CiA guys at Benwaters, however they ripped me off big time, I only got as far as Mars when it broke down, the lemmings drove me crazy squeeking all night ha ha ha
As far as I remember and it was a long time ago the UFO was tracked on radar coming at a ridiculous speed over the north sea my memory is not good but I think it was approaching 20,000 mph.
It slowed down and followed the runway and then flew very slowly towards a small field on the edge of the woods North East of the UFO was a farmhouse with outbuildings.
Now the interesting thing is that the serviceman who witnessed this said that the animals from the farmhouse were going crazy dogs barking cattle lowing etc which he thought strange as they were very quiet and so was the UFO, I actually went to the exact spot and saw that the farmhouse was a fairly long way from the UFO.
He said that they observed it and he kept saying to my friend(the military policewoman) its not what you think it is,she said what do you mean?
The annoying thing was that he kept stopping and saying we were told not to talk about it and just kept saying it was weird really weird .
Then he said that it was almost translucent with a light source inside but not all that bright, then and this was the thing that interested me, he said that it had the shape of a flying saucer but that instead of highly polished metal it had lumpy protrusions that were uneven like uneven lumpy tiles .
To be honest I can’t remember the whole thing as it was so long ago but I bought a book on it and saw a documentary which gave the experience of the base commander a man called leut Colonel Halt in that account I believe that either him or one of his colleagues saw a UFO that had the appearance of a miniature TR 3 B and either him or another guy touched the UFO and it raced off at top speed and was gone. The points I think are important are 1. The animals going crazy which is strange as the animals around there were used to the A.10 s flying around there at night and day . 2 the knobbly hull of the ship .
Strangely I had a girlfriend at the time with 3 kids two young boys and an older daughter and we decided to go camping to Dunwich Heath anyway the daughter decided to stay with a schoolfriend of hers so we went with the tents and camped on the Heath.
My van was a matt green colour so didn’t stand out.
We had a campfire and it was a fantastic night for seeing the milky way and stars plus moon, the boys were tired and dozing off but we let them sleep awhile before waking them up a bit later as we were all sitting there I thought I heard a strange noise so did my girlfriend and we both turned our heads around directly behind us, I saw what I thought was a mound or small hillock but when I looked more carefully I could see it was very similar to the shape of the UFO the witnesses had seen and complete with knobbly hull.
All of a sudden there was quite a loud bang not loud enough to wake the boys but with a kind of weird hollow sound then it just vanished into thin air.
We put the boys to bed and sat by the fire quite shocked as you can imagine strangely my girlfriend saw it exactly as I did thinking like me that it was a small mound then remembering that in daylight the place was as flat as a pancake.
Not long after that I read a book called the cosmic pulse of life its a big book but well worth a read, it explains how Wilhelm Reich was plagued by UFOS its written by a guy called Trevor James Constable he explains that animals often go crazy when UFOs appear, his opinion is that they are demonic entities that’s why the animals are scared of them.
I’m not 100% sure but I have a hunch that the story that someone touched the hull of the mini TR 3 B may be an embellishment but that’s just a hunch.
Anyways don’t let those robbing bastards with your boat get you down Allan L8ers James
Hi Alan, would you please take a peak at my YT channel (to varify I know some things about boats) I’m going to spend the winter in TN working on my latest shanty boat project, I might be able to help you. Oh…I’ve read two of your books and been a fan for a long time.
YT channel: back waters and back roads
My father died of ALS when he was 47. My best friend Marie, a great fan of yours, died of it last year. She had it for 2-ish years and used to be the picture of a strong, healthy woman.
The crazy long life of Hawking always was nearly impossible to believe.
Since im a kid I have 2 major problem with astrophysicist 1) They tell us the universe is infinite but it is a growing thing since 14 000 000 000 years, how could a infinite thing grow ? 2) What was there before and what our universe is in , in other way what is this BIG VOID surrounding our universe before and after the BIG BANG ? (cannot wait for the BIG CRUNCH)
The chief engineer of the Mars mission make me piss in my pant. The guy know nothing about the gadget he was in charge to send on Mars. Always refering to a invisible teammate to answer even simple question like the format of the picture the rover is sending back to earth. But, personnaly i stop watch Richplanet du to 1) They freak out on Madeleine McCann case when so many children disappear every year in every countries on this planet (Satanist need fresh blood) 2) They are fully engulf in Judy Wood theory wich is in my book a weird scientist because she cannot repeat the Hutchison effect but a directed energy like the Hutchison technology was the only weapon use to bring down the Twin Tour.
Maybe you did’nt notice but now it is clear the official in US gov office are proud supporter of the Big Red piece of shit: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-navy/2019/10/15/naval-academy-midshipmen-seek-satanic-temple-space/
So dont ask why lies are the rules…
BTW so easy to make Hawkins say anything…he was unable to talk by himself.
You have to think outside the square…how can the Universe be finite?..like if its “fenced off” – there has to be more over the fence – right?. Everything is always moving and vibrating in various circles or spirals, including the Trillions+ of Galaxies.
If you want to hear a Great Mind & Speaker, speak today, have a listen to Wal Thornhill on the Electric Universe and Gravity etc . He’s one of the few real scientists who talks logic and sense today.
Yes, the big bang is a big bunch of bull.
Today wiki say : “The radius of the observable universe is therefore estimated to be about 46.5 billion light-years and its diameter about 28.5 gigaparsecs (93 billion light-years, 8.8×1026 metres or 2.89×1027 feet)”…those are finite number….i know its huuuuuuuuuuuuge…my problem is the main theory state the univers is like a balloon groing in nothing, in the Big Void…and before what the Big Bang the Big Void was compose of what ? No atoms at all ? Not even hydrogen ? im fully aware of the Electric Universe and i know matter dont really exist…what we see or touch is motsly compose of empty space…
Yes – “OBSERVABLE”… (note how ‘they’ never tell you it goes forever).
The Universe always was, and always will be, but you have to find out for yourself.
And yes, we (and every object) are about 99.9999999999% nothing – empty space.
Wal Thornhill is turning nasa upside down,embarrassed, and with feathers flying.
‘good old Miles’ — yes, a fellow worth reading. His onion-peeling of ecologism (Sept 27) and [state]-terrorism (Oct., four parts*) in the land of Black Metal are very good.
Hawking as hawked to us does remind of the Rovers — and of the Voyagers, from whom i suppose we’ll be hearing mighty big news one of these days. (The fictional #6 identified as ‘V___ger’ in the first Trek flick (1979)).
Good too that you credit Hall and Johnson for their work on the Great Devon island Scam. of course it is no unresolvable nor unfamiliar contradiction that they could be good there but bad on Dr Judy.
* Could you have a look at Part 4, on Ole Dammegard?
Yes, of all things, those ridiculous front teeth gave Hawking’s game away in the end.
What I always wished I could do decades ago > https://youtu.be/I0UgB6xX_ME?t=348
Nobody want’s to pour cold water on your boat dream, and I certainly don’t.
I would like to own a boat, only if I was a billionaire, – with the crew and minders to go with it.
The lies and B.S are at terrible fever pitch today, and BTW,I spotted one of those wafer thin 301 stainless steel panels flapping in the breeze yesterday.
The wisdom of wealth – no second wife, no third house, no first boat.
That is pretty good.