I was going to try to get cute with the title, but then I was thinking how important this is, I think, and decided against it. See, I might be losing my mind. A couple days ago I happened to view a clip from Eisenhower’s famous Farewell Address from 1961, the well-known bit about the ‘Military Industrial Complex,’ and which I have probably seen a hundred times, maybe more, via various ‘truther’ documentaries. (In one version of Water Time I used it.)
Then, today, just now – I mean a few minutes ago — I happened across it again. This time it wasn’t right, and it was so obvious I literally had to sit down (I was making coffee) and go back and watch/listen again. I mean I had just seen it two days ago, and now it’s different.
Let’s get right to it. Below starts with the original source from today (a guy’s video); then I go to the whole speech, as it is in the most viewed official version, and give you the same clip. See what you think…
I need feedback. Please let me know if I’m right or is something wrong with me. If you don’t usually comment, please make an exception and do so here. If you don’t remember one way or the other, send this to a friend (or all your friends) and let me know what they say.
I don’t want to get ahead of myself (since I might be nuts) but, given the subject matter and the very word and thought he stutters on, this one would seem to indicate some twisted motivation. This one is purposeful. Indicates malice aforethought.
But anyway, this seems to be a brand spanking new one. At least for me.
Allan
The other thing is that I was just thinking about the Mandela Effect. ‘Ea’ had left a link to an interesting video on the ME, which posits that it may be related to Predictive Programming. (Skip through it though; the guy needs to learn about attention spans.)
HNY everybody!
What exactly do you want to prove Allan? That any information in Internet can be changed at any time? Ain’t that obvious? That’s not ME. That is not a VHS tape, which now shows different content than it showed in the past. The trick with VHS tapes works only because the old original ones disappeared long ago or cannot be played anymore and what is now being sold to us as “old” is actually new and can contain anything. It’s not like Eisenhower is saying different things now. It’s still the same speech. No ME there.
The same speech wrecked by a govt. Moron?…just to annoy people today?.
Weird things are going on, AND standards have fallen through the floor.
It is another ME distraction though isn’t it?.
I remember the ‘Eisenhower’s farewell address’ speech without the stutter error. And I have two versions saved from YouTube several years ago, both OK.
AFAIK such kind of a president speech is practically always pre-recorded. And this speech looks like pre-recorded to me (simple studio setup, just one camera, no cut-in from other camera with different point of view, no live audience/journalists). I could not find any confirmation that it was live broadcast.
I carefully checked both audio and video. To me it is a damage. If you see it frame by frame, it is obvious that both sound and video are affected at the same time (11 static frames). It could be multiplied to other nearly identical videos because of data deduplication throughout Google data centers.
“This one is purposeful. Indicates malice aforethought.” You are inclined to think so.
It comes back to memory, unfortunately. No one so far remembered the stutter until i pointed it out. That’s what you have to explain, not the mechanics of it. More than half have the stutter, including the National Archived one, which is what most filmmakers would use to grab it. If you don’t see this as a mystery, you are not thinking it through, or are in denial.
By the way, there’s the ‘right version’ on Zeitgeist Addendum…
Good point. ‘Right’ meaning no stutter I assume.
Please Allan, just stop questionning your memory. You’re right. Everything else is just a way of putting you out of your logic thinking. It’s so easy to mess with the digital medium…Imagine how easy it is easy it is to mess with sound…or image…same with any digital information.
I mean, they could mess with your emails and make you believe you’re nuts;.Trust your memory, don’t believe what you see in the ‘digital world’, trust your instinct, the only real thing we have.
Intuition, instinct, anything else is just … bablling…
I think you’re missing the point. Just b/c they can mess with anything does not explain all the issues with the ME.
Definitely different versions but how and why?
It’s like there’s a messing with time derived from
the Akashic records as in past and future.
What we don’t like is being guinea pigs, mentally
or otherwise. If it’s evil, God (will) help us.
Exposing and recognizing these changes needs to
Be made aware of. I will forward this info.
May 2020 vision continue to be enlightening…
One posted on youtube dated 11/23/2007 by UndergroundGonzo is perfectly clean.
What does ‘clean’ mean?
I detect a quick movement of his head at the moment of the “stutter” indicating an editing artifact. Between Mandela Effects, Mud Floods, Tartaria Hidden History, and Flat Earth …I can’t keep keep up enough to sort through it all. HELP!
I agree. See my new post for a video archive that includes one version that especially shows this. The question is, though, what kind of editing and by whom?
It is a glitch in the recording. Might be from the compression.
I don’t know if this is helpful, but I remember that this clip was used in the film “The Atomic Cafe”, so maybe you could check a copy of that.
Maybe you could check…
No, it’s not on there. Must be on another film — I remember it actually started the film because when I watched that movie on videocassette years ago, it had been the first time I heard that quote from Ike, and I thought it was quite remarkable at the time.
I think that this one may just be editing, the reason for multiples is simply that these fucks are actors reading from a script with a defined narrative so it is not such a stretch that multiple takes would have been taken with the best put up for transmission.
Helluva good point. But I THINK it was broadcast live, in which case… never mind. Right?
I do not think it was, the reverb and slap back delay would have been a nightmare in that room, a cursory glance at the wiki and no mention of live, no there is no other sound in the room which means pre recorded but most likely a live transmission of said recording!
whats The name of the new technology that allows them to alter videos and make people say whatever they want? I believe it is called deep fake?
Yes good point, but not possible if all the versions have the stutter. Not possible that they changed all of them. Same with the VHS tapes etc of movies.
An excellent point.
Everyone? Am posting this “How to Capture a Screen Shot and Save It” I posted at TBP. I am also going to share a post here with Allan where I SHARE his Mandela Effect essay and video about Ike’s Speech.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/01/11/pictures-worth-thousands-of-words/
Oh, and don’t worry about the thumbs up stuff or the nastiness. Some of the folks there have Agendas and they don’t like me much.
Jimmy Buffett sings,”If we weren’t crazy we would all go insane…” or something like that…Stay crazy my friend and don’t worry about it. Those on the road to insanity have it much worse than those of us already there. I got a gift T-shirt this week that says,”I may be wrong, but not likely!” You should have one too!
If we are living in a computer simulation are we software bugs, viruses, or part of the intended program? Either way it all-HTWRW-keeps coming up as a cosmic joke of sorts…maybe the lesson is while we strive to do our part we should be laughing at it all anyway…If we live with the desire to love, learn, & grow …maybe we will be ok.
The stutter is new to me. And it cannot be accidental editing it seems to me. Since both versions still exist the ME seems the obvious answer. When he stutters he clearly says the word guard twice so editing seems out, unless someone is playing games with us.
Yes, right. I’m going to do a post today running through the possibilities but it appears we caught this one early enough that all of the versions have not been changed. PLEASE do make short copies of the ones you find without the stutter (and with, if you have the time). This could be a smoking gun. I’m blown away. Thanks to all who found the ‘old’ version.
Alan, maybe someone did a bad job by cut/spliced/ editing. Regardless, it’s not worth starting down the rabbit tunnel of loosing your mind, spinning your brain into some conspiracy. Go out and small the roses,buy a bird book, try to cok something different, make a new friend. You don’t want to loose your mind. Write about life as a nomad and all the people you’ve met. (and be much more fierce about editing)
Maybe. But a quick YouTube Search brings up this: Eisenhower Farewell Address (Best Quality) – ‘Military Industrial Complex’ WARNING
From 2015, supposedly, and this one has it too! And its “best quality”, maybe a hint.
The people who own everything can play such jokes, and they do. The braces conspiracy made it through all “alternative” media, and finally arrived here in Germany on “Bewusst TV”.
I take this as a motivation to save more material I consider interesting to my hard drive. Hundreds of clips and podcasts still need less space than one 4k Hollywood movie.
Horst, check out the German versions if you have time and copy relevant clips. Everyone, at least write down the sources (UrLs) you check, either with or without. Write it down! If you make a copy of one without the stutter and it later changes, that will be that. Right? So especially if you do not believe me (that this is unexplainable), copy and write down a few examples of each and see what happens. Don’t necessarily take others’ word for it.
I don’t normally comment, but I have been reading and appreciating for a few years. It is just a poorly edited clip, purposely meant to deceive. You see how he goes from “carve” (or whatever that edited in partial word is), to “guard” seemingly in one frame?
-Matthew
Okay, here we have either a… never mind.
I think this is an interesting rabbit hole, but agree Allan could get lost in this rabbit warren for a while.
I have rabbits here that I raise. We could eat them, theoretically. They are also pets.
https://youtu.be/_bqr5DVx3dw
Ok I found three with the stutter and this one without. Hopes this helps Allan. I have absolutely no idea what to make of this.
Great work, Dave!
In the new version (the card/guard version) I notice that Eisenhower’s eyebrows, precisely on the word guard, are raised above the line of his glasses. He raises them, as anyone would, to deal with what is a mistake in his speaking, says card and then, raising eyebrows to correct himself, says guard.
Yet in the smooth, older, version, his eyebrows remain the same, not upraised at all.
WTF?
I think you are right.
After watching this one, I replayed Allan’s. Upon watching the second time, the first clip has a slight Max Headroom thing going on with the head. The second looked to be refined better with the head glitch smoothed out.
I downloaded a copy of the one linked by David, just incase.
To me it looks like sloppy editing, I don’t believe it changes the context,
Pasting this in: If you make a copy of one without the stutter and it later changes, that will be that. Right? So especially if you do not believe me (that this is unexplainable), copy and write down a few examples of each and see what happens. Don’t necessarily take others’ word for it.
Do it! ‘Remembering’ is not good enough. We have to have them on hard drives, and see what happens.
This one is unaffected.
https://vimeo.com/231793296
I don’t remember any stinking stutter.
I remember it like this –
https://youtu.be/9QXjBVC233s
Awhile back I wrote this:
Funny on a blog pointing out fakery, nobody commented on an apparently perfect rendition of Pegasus, in black, shown on a documentary like film about a Nevada nuclear detonation. Does smoke shrink into mythological shapes when they are nuclear????
Go to that very link, which I describe as Pegasus in black, is now Pegasus in white. It’s in
‘Another Book Review’
https://i.postimg.cc/ncNX0VS6/Screenshot-2020-01-01-137-Nevada-atomic-test-1955-You-Tube.png
I got Pegasus in black at 1:48… gone by 1:49.