Creeped Out

I almost had some kind of bizarre disinformation breakdown last night and it was physical, like an infarction or stroke or something. I was listening to a YT audio book I came across (YT has lots of them); it was Carl Sagan’s ‘Pale Blue Dot’ book, from 1994, and I was listening to pick up on some new physics untruths (lies, actually). More on that in a minute. While Sagan was pontificating in the background, I came across a YT video titled ‘The 20 Biggest Science Breakthroughs of the Last Decade’, right? Well, holy shit, but I think the disinformation coming at me from two different directions hit some sort of diabolical synchronistic disharmony and suddenly the world — or whatever it is — was spinning and floating around the rig was a ghostly likeness of Neil Armstrong assuring me in a soothing monotone that it all is flat and…

DCIM112GOPROG0062580.JPG

That’s Gus and me down there, and the rig. Notice how there’s no one near us? The rest of the desert is wall to wall RVs. I must give off a… vibe. Good.

…okay, i’m getting carried away, but the synchronistic disharmony did hit me: Sagan, from his audio book, was assuring me that Venus, while maintaining it’s 4.5 billion year old age, has a surface temperature of 900 degrees (F), , while the video was going on about the image of a black hole they’ve come up with via the worldwide cooperation of advanced technology and scientific accord…

You get the idea; a bullshit overload. Although Sagan’s revelations about the cosmos occasionally were more or less believable, the title of the book was a constant reminder that he was part of the op to keep us dumb and misled, plus his Venus information was nagging me on a level that only came to light this morning, upon my return from Nod. Here’s what that’s about and it’s actually important. I’ll explain via an email I sent to some Electric Universe guys…

I was listening to Sagan’s audio book The Pale Blue Dot (to list the truths/untruths) and noticed something. Sagan tells us that Venus has a super-dense cloud cover of sulphuric acid, so dense that basically no sunlight reaches the surface of the planet. He also makes the usual claim of CO2 and a ‘runaway greenhouse effect’. OK, but he also says that the SURFACE temp of Venus is 900 F. If sunlight does not reach the surface then there is no ‘greenhouse effect’ (which prevents reflected photons’ escape into space, but since no sunlight reaches the surface, there can be no reflection), let alone a runaway one, so how could the surface be that hot? The planet itself is the source of the heat. I’m of course referring to Velikovsky, and that Venus is a new planet.

Big fish

A Montauker sent me this, from the mid-80s (when I was a looker). A 500 lb Giant Tuna. No that’s not redundant. A tuna over 310 pounds is a ‘giant,’ and worth a lot of bucks to the Japanese. We sold this one ‘on the hoof’ a few minutes later for $5,000. Next day it was in Tokyo being eaten for $30 an ounce.

Addendum: Immanuel Velikovsky, in his classic book World’s in Collusion, posits that Venus was originally a comet, spewed (or ‘born’) from the gas giant Jupiter when the solar system was unstable. This was during ‘pre-history’ and is the source of the myth that Venus was born from Zeus (Jupiter). Although current Electric Universe theory points at Saturn as the source of Comet Venus, that Dr V has been ignored and/or vilified by the mainstream is a hint that he’s right.

It’s important to note that Velikovsky predicted that Venus would be very hot; this was in 1950, way before a probe verified Venus’s super-high temperature. A lucky guess? I don’t think so. This essay is worth a look.

The mainstream will probably say that the atmospheric CO2/sulphuric acid gets that hot but I doubt that is possible (by gas laws?) and anyway, the atmosphere couldn’t heat up a whole planet to the point where the surface is halfway to the melting point of most rock. Seems that the laws of physics debunk the runaway greenhouse explanation for Venus’s temperature, leaving only one reasonable theory, i.e., Velikovsky’s.

This may be obvious but I haven’t heard anyone on our side voice it; if this is the case you guys can probably refine the point made. [end email]

 Anyway, aside from the above observations, the video on the 20 Biggest Scientific Discoveries of the Decade is worth a viewing as an example of the insane state of the sciences. (Yes, ‘insane’ state, not ‘sad’ state.) Here is their list and please note that the ‘discoveries’ are either untrue or upsetting in some moral or existential manner. In reverse order:

20 First photograph of a black hole. There are no such things as black holes. This is provable in several ways, but the easiest is to point out that stars are not gas bodies; they are condensed matter. This is obvious from the fact that the sun has a surface (a gas body can not have a surface). Therefore, stars are not compressible. The physical definition of a black hole demands compressibility. The math and even the logic are also fallacious. By ‘logic’ I mean black holes are impossible by definition. See Steve Crothers here. If that isn’t enough, look up his other videos.

19 Human children now born having three parents. I don’t know if this is true or not but the point is that they see this as progress. 

cosmic banditos in france

Notice the book ad in the window. This is France. I haven’t seen a buck from the French in 10 years. Think maybe I’m getting ripped off? (I do like their new cover. Wish I had a copy.) By the way, how many authors do you know whose book is over 30 years old and not only still in print, but in the window of a book store? I mean aside from dead guys.

18 Progress toward artificial brains. I would suggest we first get our biological brains in order before we start constructing machine ones. (I know: I’m just being a smart ass with no added information, i.e., an appeal to ridicule. Okay, duly noted.) 

17 Memory manipulation in rodents. I hardly need comment on this one, but they do tell us that memory manipulation technology for humans hasn’t been invented… yet. Which of course means it has. 

16 Interstellar advances Hooray! They start this one with a doozy of an understatement: ‘Although the decade was notably lacking in terms of manned space flight…’ No shit. It’s been about 60 years since the first manned space flight and Spacex (the current ‘leader’ in space stuff) still hasn’t decided it’s safe to put a ‘man’ in one of their ‘spacecraft.’ What’s wrong with this picture? (Plus, of course, the obvious fakery in their TV specials.) 

Don’t get me started on this one!

15 Robot Self-Organization. They start with a question: ‘Is the machine uprising nigh? Ha-ha.’ They then boast that robots are now working together on common goals. Okay. The question is Why are they happy about this?

14. New targeted gene theory. This one would seem a positive claim, given all the genetic disorders that could be cured by genetic engineering, but I suggest you give the movie Splice a look before you get too happy. Seriously, this is the creepiest movie I’ve ever seen, while being thoroughly entertaining. And I suspect it’s one of their predictive programming gems.

13. Animal discoveries. I don’t know what to make of some of the ‘Mandela Effect’ animals that have turned up in the last few years, but before razzing me, do some searches. You wanna talk creepy?

splice

This is from ‘Splice.’ You wanna get creeped out by where gene splicing is going? (The two lead characters are named ‘Elsa’ and ‘Clive.’ Points go to anyone who can suss out the old movie allusion here.)

12. Synthetic DNA. First they tell us that DNA is the ‘recipe’ for life itself, then brag that the PTB can now mix and match it pretty much as they want. As if this is great news.

11 External wombs. If this sounds familiar, it’s right out of Brave New World. If you recall that tale — and the predictive motive of its author —  there’s no more to say.

10 Another decade with no evidence of alien life. You gotta love this one. I mean love it, having probably snapped a photo or two of a craft with aliens inside. Or maybe not. No matter, the point being they are still saying this, even after the New York-fucking-A Times now admits that the U.S. Military has been tracking alien crafts for decades. 

9 The rise of artificial intelligence. Yes, they are repeating themselves. And it’s all good news

8 Combating major diseases. As if there hasn’t already been a surfeit of irony here, the only two diseases they bring up — ebola and HIV — were weaponized by the PTB to kill us. Now they’re bragging about finding cures? 

mandela animals5

A creepy new animal? I dunno, but it’s not in the video. I hadda find it myself.

7 Rocket science. As I say, they are repeating, and the irony just piles up, given their only mention of progress in rocket science is ‘Spacex,’ which, as you know if you’ve been following this blog, is faking its missions. Christ, watch Kubrick’s 2001: That’s what they promised us for 20 years ago. HOW CAN THEY BRAG ABOUT THIS?

6 Dating old art. I’ll give them a pass on this one. 

5 Filling out the human family tree. Right up my alley. See my posts on Neanderthals and human origins, but a good example of how far from reality human origins has gotten, they show us an image of what a Denisovan looked like, based on one pinkie bone they found in a Siberian cave. You wanna talk arrogance… or stupidity? (How about a combination?)

4 the beginning of the Crispr era. No, not misspelled: Crispr. As if they haven’t blabbed about DNA enough, the ‘Crispr’ is a way of editing DNA. In other words, more monsters are coming. With science over the past decade, if it ain’t a lie, it’s bad news.

3 Kepler 452-B. This refers to the exoplanet they call ‘earth’s twin.’ I don’t know if this one is a lie, a hoax, or a joke. Anyone want to chime in? 

2. Discovery of gravitational waves. I was waiting for this one, since it’s so easy to prove wrong (a fraud); Whatever they claim to have discovered (‘gravity waves’) moves through space at the speed of light. Well, if ‘gravity’ moved at the speed of light, our solar system would be unstable, since the various bodies would be reacting to where each other was, not is.

If it took 8 minutes for the sun’s gravity to reach earth, we’d fly off into space tout suite. That’s just the way it is. That none of the pundits bring this up is a perfect example… of something. (Yes, it really is that simple.)

mandela animals2

I dunno if this animal is a Mandela Effect or what.

1 Discovery of the Higg’s boson. My next favorite load of horse shit. This is science’s most recent attempt to do what they have failed to do since the Greeks: Define matter. Define energy. If you’re interested in this subject, read the book The Higgs Fake: How Particle Physicists Fooled the Nobel Committeeby  Alexander Unzicker.

With the Large Hadron Collider they spent like $15 billion (so far) on a fraud. What else is new?

That they may have an ulterior motive (possibly relating to the occult) for building the LHC is another question. A really good one, actually, and which may relate to the Mandela Effect. (The LHC produced a video that has a scientist holding up a placard with ‘Mandela’ on it, and grinning like a fool. Before you smirk, go to 2:30 in this, then stutter out your explanation.)

So this is my summation of Youtube’s summation of the previous decade in science. I’m tired, rattled, and not a happy boy.

I’m creeped out!

#

Here’s part of the sky-lapse I did two nights ago. I like the way the composition and lighting worked. It was my Gopro Hero5 Black set at 30 second exposure (800 ISO). This is about three hours of real time:

In the comments to the last post someone brought up Max Igan, whom I outed as a state mole a while back. Recently William Engdahl forwarded me the following, which is from an associate William vouches for (the redactions are for anonymity):

I know of Max Igan…not to be trusted. A friend of mine who I do trust knew him in REDACTED, ….REDACTED….., etc but caught [him] lying about stuff…apparently he has been compromised by some kind of ex-military involvement with this and that, my friend knows the whole story but [he/she] says that he is what they call ‘controlled opposition’…probably using the ‘truth is our weapon’ approach to tell a lot of the truth but then to marginalize or derail other more significant parts of it…like the military geo-engineering thing. yes, he will probably come out saying that no evidence exists for pulsed energy weapons, etc…his technical knowledge is not very good anyway.

It’s nice to get independent verification of stuff like this. I don’t enjoy outing state mole scum.

Allan

I’m still looking into the cartographic anomalies from the last post. I’m concentrating on Greenland for now.

 

  22 comments for “Creeped Out

  1. January 21, 2020 at 7:18 pm

    Wow look what I found, University Professor (30 years there) goes against climate change mantra, and gets sacked by University. He takes them to court, and wins! (that’s almost impossible to believe) , Judge found he was unlawfully attacked on many counts > https://youtu.be/n7e8mdvOWGw

    Australia (as are most countries) is in a Hell of a state, from the meanest, most rotten corruption from the Top > https://youtu.be/IzkL6_A5CD0

  2. Todd
    January 21, 2020 at 7:13 pm

    Allan,
    Why classify HIV as weaponized?

    I’ve read Jon Rappoport’s book “AIDS Inc.”. He presents Aids as being more a lifestyle of heavy and lengthy drug and antibiotic usage with no verifiable link between HIV and Aids and most people have the HIV in themselves already. The Aids symptoms are really an amalgam of many other previous symptoms over the years that have been re-classified as Aids. Simply following a healthier lifestyle would improve the health those affected with “aids” w/out the drugs.
    Per Jon, this was a manufactured crisis to bring about the drug cartels solution to their identified problem. And if this were weaponized how did it strictly affect only the homo population and not hetero when many individuals were bisexual and again, only large cities. Weaponization would extend beyond large cites and gay males in the early onset in the 1980’s.

    Additionally, when you go to donate blood, why ask all the lifestyle questions? Either you have HIV or not, right? If this were a legit healththreat, there would be no reason to ask those questions.

    Can you compare the two views to help shed light on this topic.

  3. January 19, 2020 at 7:29 pm

    And yes, that is an incredible! achievement, to have one of your books still in shop windows after 30 years. No royalties from over there?? :-O….are there any levers to pull, to find out whats going on?.
    You should have been in front of the camera mostly, not writing scripts (maybe both?).
    Lots of cool stuff in your posts!, and that loyal pal Guss, way down there beside you in the drone picture makes me smile 🙂

    • January 19, 2020 at 7:32 pm

      …..can also see the curve of the earth in that pic 😀

  4. Cat
    January 19, 2020 at 6:36 am

    Conscious vs Fake ego science is kind of where
    It seems to be going. There’s an interesting health and
    All-around studied guy that has something
    To say about the blow hard scientists. Tried to find
    An interview, but here’s his site, he debunk’s most
    Theoretical physics scientists
    https://www.davidrowland.name/theoretical-physics-books/
    Still a looker Allan…

  5. elpolvo
    January 19, 2020 at 1:53 am

    allan-

    i always like it when you include your own pictures and time lapses in your blog posts. thanks. i see you got another drone. did you notice the parachutist straight up from the McD’s billboard (near the top of the frame? what was up with the balloons? …advertising tools?

    i hope your stroke didn’t have any lasting damages. it’s a bitch getting old. 🙂 you made up for it with the old photo of the handsome kid and the tuna.

  6. January 18, 2020 at 10:52 pm

    Hey Allan, awesome stuff you post!, I have been short of time this week to try and help you find more concrete evidence on anything much which you bring up.
    1.Hey those old maps controlled by the Catholic Church??.
    2. Love your metal detector adventures coming up!.
    3. I have never noticed a drone photo from you before – cool!.
    4. Some thing has happened to Max Igan suddenly, as from a few days ago.
    Reckons he has been “mind infiltrated” (their brain control weapon), and he has fallen off the perch, and talking confusing – (for the brain dead anyway ) – chowder brain Mush.
    Saying things like -“OK folks, the truth is the earth is really flat”, ” but it can be flat or round if you want”, “or a combination of flat & round”.
    People are saying he is pretending insanity to avoid jail, because he seems to be in hot water over his Ozzy bush fire vids.
    Here is an awesome truther (I know who it is, I recognize his voice) talking about him >
    https://youtu.be/9DD3x-Fn44I
    Two of the creepiest movies I have ever seen – Under the Skin, and The Fly (with Geoff Goldblum).

    • January 19, 2020 at 12:13 am

      Yeah, i just left a comment on that link and on Igan’s latest video. Here it is:

      Yes, here’s my evidence that Igan is a mole:
      http://blog.banditobooks.com/max-igans-independent-analysis/

      And then I got this via William Engdahl (an associate of his):

      I know of Max Igan…not to be trusted. A friend of mine who I do trust knew him in REDACTED, ….REDACTED….., etc but caught [him] lying about stuff…apparently he has been compromised by some kind of ex-military involvement with this and that, my friend knows the whole story but [he/she] says that he is what they call ‘controlled opposition’…probably using the ‘truth is our weapon’ approach to tell a lot of the truth but then to marginalize or derail other more significant parts of it…like the military geo-engineering thing. yes, he will probably come out saying that no evidence exists for pulsed energy weapons, etc…his technical knowledge is not very good anyway.

      The guy is no good. Now’s telling us flat earth is true if you believe it, that nonsense. Dis and mis-info.

      • January 19, 2020 at 2:01 am

        btw… thanks for the link… again.

        Perhaps someone will GET it?

  7. jnan
    January 18, 2020 at 10:07 pm

    Thanks Allan, for the mental workout ………

    • January 19, 2020 at 12:14 am

      No problem. It’s truly creepy, tho, that all that science is crap, and so many people believe it.

  8. Jean-François Aubry
    January 18, 2020 at 2:35 pm

    In my book on HTWRW i come to the conclusion that we live under the rule of evil being not from our realm. Some being (I will call them Angel) have the ability to read and write in mind. Schizophrenic people always report heard of voice telling them to kill themself or other. And if you watch our so called elite it is clear they enjoy the flood of blood. The Stalin experience like Hitler, or any war lord spirit or genocidal master mind are not just random event. Those destiny were set by what we call fallen angel to create river of blood and ocean of sadness. Right now in the western world horror movie and apocalyptic sect like Ramtha and in the past People temple let me believe the satanic church (Satan is your best friend according to so many) is going pretty well. 9/11 was for them a beautifull ceremony and the falling of Europe a plan to totally destroy their economy and community.

    In my personnal life almost every day i encounter people wich seem normal but act to make me unconfortable. I’m witness of impossible situation where people make me sign, or have conversation to let me know what i should do.

    A exampe i found informative is : I wrote a really nice poem (not just my opinion) on Angel in may 2018 I posted on FB. And while I was writing in my mind the concept i was a captain and the Goddess was admiral was very important (i know im border crazy…funny crazy)….but the thing is a friend of my sister named Michel make this comment on my poem: “Jean-François Aubry with a good captain, certainly …” In french “Jean-François Aubry avec un bon capitaine, assurément …” . How in the world somebody make a comment on a poem about Angel talking of the poet as a Captain ????????????

    “Les Anges

    Les anges aiment mais n’ont pas de coeur
    Sans coeur mais pas cruels
    Par delà les monts remplient de lueurs
    On entend leurs échos éternelles

    S’ils voient les loups se manger entre eux
    Ils disent tant mieux
    Détournant le regard du vicieux
    Le ciel est dans leurs yeux

    Ils cherchent dans l’appel des âmes soeur
    Le repos de leurs ailes
    Qu’a jamais on craignent leur fureur
    Pour ceux qui propagent le fiel

    Pour toujours ils cherchent l’amour
    Dans les moindres détours
    Chantant dans les voix des troubadours
    Ils sont la pour toujours

    Et si ici bas on entend leurs clameurs
    C’est qu’ils sont mortels
    Amoureux de ceux qui aime le labeur
    Comme du sourire d’une belle

    Si on en voit sous la Lune
    C’est qu’ils ont perdu leurs plumes
    Se cachant sous les runes
    Dans les marais et les brumes

    Les anges aiment et ont un cœur
    Quand ils sont réels
    Mes amis, mon frère, ma soeur
    Tirez bien l’oreille

    Les anges sont parmi nous
    Et j’en suis fou”

    Finally Allan I think good and evil Angel exist. They have the ability to read and write in the mind of human (like in the movie Wings of Desire) . I dont know what produce a good or a evil angel. I dont know what their plan. I dont know how the thing really work. The only thing im 100/100 sure is they exist.

    Your fish is a blobfish a peculiar fish native to the deep waters around Australia and New Zealand. Crispr scissor exist and hold your hat because. Bernie Sander will be the next President but it will be only the smooth talk of the killer….im not a prophet just a modern Sherlock like you my all time prefered Yankee.

    Can i have the name of your french publisher..will be a honnor to make im understand how he’s wrong.

    • January 18, 2020 at 5:28 pm

      Well, it would not surprise me if you were correct about evil incarnate. Best is to just expose it and see how it squirms. I forget the french company.

  9. Horst
    January 18, 2020 at 9:10 am

    Thesis: Science is the same as Kabbalah. There is a Carl Sagan Video, I’d like to share, for me it was the eye opener. Kabbalah teaches our earthly existence is a shadow of the “above”.
    Here Carl teaches the same the science way:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N0WjV6MmCyM
    Jump in at 5:16, here you get the cube, and the shadow.
    Lately had a moment, finding a presentation, where someone did the same thing in a lecture about Friedrich Weinreb.
    Considering this, makes me think about what they tell about space, with the attitude of knowing.

    • January 18, 2020 at 5:36 pm

      Interesting that Sagan does not seem to realize that he is asking us to believe in his 4th dimension based on faith alone, no different from a religious guru talking about angels and pin heads. This is all okay, but he should own up to it.

      • January 18, 2020 at 5:45 pm

        https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/01/18/the-nikon-p-1000-problem/#comment-1894305

        Am wondering if you have an opinion about the flat earth controversy ongoing? Do you have a good post that addresses the controversy?

        • January 18, 2020 at 8:47 pm

          Disappointing that you would bring this up, given that FE is such an obvious psy op, and which I have written about many times, including on TBP. ONE MORE TIME, here is all you need:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeHtjUxjEFE&t=292s

          • January 19, 2020 at 12:25 am

            Thank you. I know you have your focus and I have mine, but the two have bumped shoulders in the hallway, so to speak.

      • January 19, 2020 at 5:34 pm

        As the late, great Aleister Crowley once said,

        “We place no reliance on virgin or pigeon
        our method is science
        our aim is religion”

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyxGqmWvzGE

        The truth you are seeking, Allan, is gained experientally. You must perform the experiments on YOURSELF to KNOW the truth of this reality.

        All else is monkey chatter.

        • Nigel
          January 24, 2020 at 10:24 pm

          I agree with you . I suspect Allan is attempting to trigger souls (who wouldn’t normally inquire) into investigating the nature of their reality with scientific methods . A difficult but noble task ( and I think he has a special kind of dislike for the initiated mis-info agents) .

  10. Pete
    January 17, 2020 at 11:48 pm

    I appreciate all the work you do. I am an avid reader . I don’t have any good input to the ideas you bring up. I am just a dumb software developer.

Leave a Reply