I’m not sure exactly when this happened but recently Youtube deleted one of my videos, labeling it ‘hate speech.’ Some of you have seen it: The interview I did with my Montauk friend, Sports Illustrated photog Walter Iooss. Maybe the 20th ‘anniversary’ of the 9/11 false flag attacks had something to do with the deletion, but in any event the PTB are ‘cleaning up’ recent history so it reads according to their agenda. 
I’ve loaded the video onto my Rumble.com channel. I suggest you look at it now; Rumble’s days are no doubt numbered as a free speech platform.
But let’s talk about ‘History.’ What is it? What does this word mean? Hey! Let’s look it up!
-
1.the study of past events, particularly in human affairs.“medieval European history”
-
2.the whole series of past events connected with someone or something.“the history of Aegean painting”
-
an eventful past.“the group has quite a history”
-
a past characterized by a particular thing.“his family had a history of insanity”
-
-
3.a continuous, typically chronological, record of important or public events or of a particular trend or institution.
This was in the cool of 10,000 feet, last month.
This is Merriam Webster’s take. (I tried the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), supposedly the ‘final word’ on words but they insisted I must be a school or other institution to use their online resource.)
Notice that there is no reference to ‘truth,’ ‘reality,’ or even ‘nonfiction’ in the above definition? Hold on. I recall I had fun with this word, i.e., ‘nonfiction,’ in CYGAWA. Lemme take a look at the book, do a word search for ‘nonfiction’ (you might do this as well, using the PDF in the sidebar)…
-
CHAPTER SEVEN
They say in my country that the Dark Lord can govern the storms in the Mountains of Shadow that stand upon the borders of Mordor. He has strange powers and many allies.
J.R.R. Tolkein
The nonfiction book by Bob Woodward I was reading and which slightly exacerbated my terminal loneliness and nudged me further towards the brink was called Veil, The Secret Wars of the CIA. I was seeking a better handle on the CIA’s antics in Central America back in the 1980s, which is the time frame of my reinvented screen story about The Meaning of Life. [I was writing the screen adaptation of Cosmic Banditos for John Cusack’s company.]
Not only did I not get a better handle on the CIA’s antics in Central America back in the 1980s, or anything else, but my reading of Veil resulted in a rush of insight of the negative variety, a dispiriting one. Woodward’s book is so packed with lies by omission and outright lies, plus blatant perception management, that it’s safe to say that the book itself is a lie. See, I already knew a bit about the 1980s, having been around then (including in Central America) and having paid attention to what was going on while doing so. In fact, all one need to have done during the 1980s – aside from being around – would have been to be conscious, i.e., not comatose, to realize that Woodward’s book, his nonfiction book, is a lie. One example: Endings. Important, right? Woodward sees fit to end Veil, The Secret Wars of the CIA with a lie on every level you can lie in a nonfiction book. He ends it with a chapter describing a personal visit with CIA director William Casey on his deathbed (from the brain tumor).
About two sentences into this, I knew Woodward had made up the scene. Remember that when it comes to making up stuff, I know whereof I speak – the old one, you can’t bullshit a bullshitter comes to mind. (Others have opined the same regarding that scene, based on looking into dates and hospital records and the like.)
But I could have forgiven that lie, which was only about facts, i.e., Woodward’s deathbed visit to Casey having never happened. I’ve lied about facts myself. Sometimes it’s okay, sometimes not. What Woodward does, however, in the deathbed scene he made up, is to lie in subtext as well — in what is really going on — which kind of lying is a sin, for the commission of which writers will rot in Writer Hell.
Here’s the scene: Casey, on his deathbed, admits to having known about the diversion of Iran arms sales funds to the contras. The subtext here is that Casey didn’t have anything to do with the diversion. He knew about it.
Technically, Woodward wasn’t outright lying. But what he left out of his fucking narrative is that Casey knew about the diversion because he had been instrumental in planning and executing it.
A whopper of a lie by omission, no?
Another thing Woodward left out of his fucking narrative about the CIA in the 1980s involves drug trafficking by the contras. Casey and his protégé, Oliver North, didn’t just know about contra drug trafficking, they were likewise directly involved in the okaying of it, the running of it, plus the cover-up. (In 1989, Oliver North was barred entry into Costa Rica for being a known drug trafficker.) In Veil, Woodward doesn’t even mention the contras and drug trafficking, let alone that Casey and North knew about it, let alone that they were directly involved in the okaying, running, and subsequent cover-up.* Since the contra war in Nicaragua was one of the secret wars of the CIA of the title of Woodward’s book, one would think that the CIA’s involvement in drug trafficking to finance that war would bear mention, no?
Since other journalists from that time knew about all this, how did Bob Woodward miss it? The answer is that he didn’t miss it. He just left it out of his fucking narrative, for reasons related to Woodward having turned into a shitball motherfucker toady of the powers that be.
Of Bob Woodward’s nonfiction books since All the President’s Men, at the time of my brink-hovering I had only read Veil, The Secret Wars of the CIA. Out of (morbid) curiosity I went on to read two of his subsequent books. In The Commanders, purported to be the definitive history of the U.S. military’s overthrow of Manuel Noriega, Woodward devotes one sentence to U.S. history with the Panamanian dictator. Here it is, the one sentence:
Although he once had been one of the CIA’s key Latin American assets, the administration now viewed (Noriega) as an outlaw and an enemy of U.S. interests.
In his definitive history, Bob Woodward justifies the invasion of another country by telling us… nothing whatsoever…
Do you think maybe Woodward left out some stuff about Noriega’s
* There’s a surf break in northern Costa Rica called Ollie’s Point, so named because it’s near a clandestine landing strip North’s cohorts used to run cocaine into the United States. Point being: If the ragamuffin surfers who named the break knew about North’s smuggling activities, why didn’t this legendary journalist?
337
relationship to the CIA in his fucking narrative? I mean aside from not even mentioning the CIA’s collusion with Noriega on drug trafficking (likewise to fund the contras) and aside from not even mentioning the list of treaties and international laws solemnly signed by the United States that were broken by the invasion. Nor does he mention that the unilateral aggression of invading another country without “imminent threat” (or any threat) is the same crime for which Nazis were executed at Nuremburg. Noriega being an “outlaw” (a drug trafficker) was fine and dandy as long as some of the drug money made its way to the illegal war the CIA was supporting, but when the dictator quit cooperating, colluding with the CIA in big-time criminal activities, he was now an “enemy of U.S. interests” and his country was fair game for invasion.
But my favorite lie by omission, one near and dear to my heart, comes in Woodward’s Plan of Attack – his definitive history of our conflict with Saddam Hussein. Woodward does better, wordage-wise, in this one, devoting one whole page (out of 450) to U.S. history with “The Beast of Baghdad.” A little problem, though: In his one page history Woodward skips from the 1970s to the 1990s, leaving out the 1980s. Not a word about the decade of the 1980s. Right: The decade during which the U.S. and The Beast of Baghdad were close allies and the U.S., under Reagan then Bush I, was actively and knowingly aiding and abetting The Beast of Baghdad in his crimes against humanity.
Thing is, Bob Woodward himself classifies his books, his nonfiction books, as being “somewhere between the news and the history books.”
Let’s take him on his word on that.
See if you concur: People who provide a democratic society (like what the United States is purported to be) with news (meaning journalists) should maybe question what the shitball motherfuckers in power tell them about their antics. Same goes for the writers of history books, which mold the minds of our children. [I know: My naivety is showing here. Keep in mind that I wrote this 15 or so years ago.]
Bob Woodward does not question anything the shitball motherfuckers tell him. Woodward just parrots their lies and perception management as facts. Bob Woodward’s books, his nonfiction books, which are something “between the news and the history books,” are lies.
That I had this rush of insight about the journalist who in the 1970s questioned everything and in so doing uncovered the truth, then followed the truth wherever it led, even to the toppling of a president, and who was a hero of mine, and who was now the personification of why Orwell was an optimist and hence of why the world is so fucked-up, slightly exacerbated my terminal loneliness.*
#
There’s some spectacular irony in the above, right there in the last paragraph, the bit about how Woodward questioned everything back in the 1970s, and how he was a hero of mine.
My niche a few days ago. My rig lower-middle.
Truth is [and which truth I didn’t know back in the 2000s], even back in the Watergate days Woodward was a deep-cover agent of the PTB. He came right out of Naval Intelligence (the ONI) and ‘somehow’ (the era of the scare quote) landed on a desk at the Washington Post, which is as much a PTB institution as the New York Times. See, the whole Watergate ‘scandal’ (ditto) was itself a psyop, meant to topple Dick Nixon, who had gotten out-of-hand-uppity. By the way, there never was a ‘Deep Throat’; they needed a plot device to keep the story rolling and the underground garage meetings sure worked, didn’t they?
But, as Woodward himself says, his deceit is ‘somewhere between the news and the history books.’ Keep this in mind.
#
But we were talking about ‘history,’ right? What it, the word, means, and so forth. That there’s no mention of truth or reality or even nonfiction in our official definition of the word.
As some of you will have noticed, and as I’ve already more or less mentioned, I’m writing this on the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, which is the subject of my YT-deleted video. So let’s deal with this… event… as it will be portrayed in ‘history.’
Most of the folks reading this know that the ‘official story’ of 9/11 is a crock of shit, so I’ll not dwell on the basics of what really happened on that day, except as it relates to ‘history,’ i.e., how the events of that day will be perceived in the future. By ‘future’ I mean years from now, say, ten years or more, but especially in the generational sense: What will your kids’ kids ‘learn’ about that day. And their kids.
Here is where the deletion of my video is relevant, for it is an example of the erasure of history in the true Orwellian sense. If you haven’t yet done so, I ask you to view the piece now; it really does sum up the problem and on more than one level.
Have you viewed it? Good. I’m hoping that Part One tells you that the news video of Flight 175 was/is bogus. Fabricated. It’s impossible to overstate the importance of this one aspect of what really happened (as opposed to what ‘history’ will tell your kids’ kids).
Long shutter speed, camera movement, the woods at noon, the light ‘terrible.’
What the fabricated imagery means is this: The media was — at the top levels and technical levels — at the heart of the deception. (Many mid-level media personnel, including the newscasters, were useful idiots in the deceit.) I repeat: From the planning to the operation itself, the 9/11 deception was a media deception more than anything else.
Do you see why this must be true, based on the media footage (as seen in my ‘hate speech’ video)? I hope so. (If in comments you are going to disagree, make sure you are specific — referring to the video — about how I am wrong.)
And do you see how my friend’s complete switcheroo on what happened that day is relevant today, on the 20th ‘anniversary’ of the event?
His switcheroo is ‘history.’
I’ve been giving a good look at the controlled opposition on Youtube and elsewhere, the so-called ‘radical right’/Trump supporters/etc., and found that their assumption re 9/11 is that ‘Osama bin Laden did it’, which is nothing short of absurd. (They also believe Obama had bin Laden killed in 2011, when it was on the news that he (bin Laden) died a decade before, in December of 2001.)
Mark Dice, the conservative funny-man, who does street interviews to show how dumb American’s are, poses his questions with the assumption that bin Laden did 9/11. He ridicules ‘liberals’ who aren’t outraged at Arabs.
This is ‘conservative truth.’ The ‘opposition.’
This is ‘history,’ especially for your kids’ kids. They will know no better.
Orwell was an optimist.
Allan
Speaking of the erasure of history, recall that my comments on Rand and Ron Paul’s channels asking how it could be that a year and a half ago I published all the info on the Wuhan lab/gain of function/ U of N. Carolina/etc., and they are only talking about it now… recall that my comments were taken down within minutes.
By the way, this post will cost me at least several subscribers, probably more. Says it all. Truly, why do I bother?
Addendum (9/12/21): This should have been much more detailed but…. I didn’t see the point. Easiest way to sum up the difference between ‘history’ and How It Really Went is to point out that there were no airliners and hence no hijackings. Oh, and damaging a building near the top cannot, by the laws of physics, cause the whole structure to disintegrate. In ten years, none of this information will exist anywhere, not in writing.
I just took another look at the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, their rap, and of course (as I already knew) not a word about the fake planes/hijackers, which begs the question Is AE9/11 Truth another controlled op, I mean ‘officially’, or just a crew of useful idiots?
I mean since the important question (who really did it, i.e., pulled it off, i.e., the media) is never dealt with, let alone answered…
Useful Idiots – those arrogant cocksuckers are everywhere it seems.
Blackmailed Pawns – seriously, can anyone really be as stupid as those bureaucrats?
Greedy Fux – How much is enough? No limit apparently.
Super Psychos – Clearly some mentally broken “humans” running things, no?
My guess is they are both.
Likely created as controlled op, though they probably allow useful idiots as “members”, as long as they toe the party line.
I can see both side re: the usefulness vs damage caused by groups such as these, but overall I think they are beneficial for getting more people to question/doubt the official narrative.
I can remember (early on in my learning process) being impressed that such a large group of “professionals” who apparently should “know”, were confirming what my own eyes were seeing about the towers.
I’ve moved on from those early days, but one could argue that it was a necessary step to go through.
Sure, many people may get stuck in the weeds, but very few who are being exposed to conspiracies can go straight to the more advanced theories. They still need their “experts” to guide them by the hand for a while.
Some eventually learn the folly in that and move on.
I agree. The important thing is they expose the official story as a lie. That’s a start. I suppose what’s annoying is you’d think these folks would be ABLE to see the news footage for the fabrications they are.
Yeah, I know.
Just like there must be many “experts” who see the obvious with regards to the covid nonsense.
I think many are simply too afraid to state the truth, preferring to preserve what they conceive of as there own safe little set of circumstances.
Though, the education system does such an amazing job at spitting out people who memorize and regurgitate the ideology of their field, I guess its very possible that many do believe their own BS.
Agreed; else they are VERY good actors.
AE9/11 Truth is 100000% sure part of the plot. In fact in 9/11 truther you will found 2 major group, and both debunk the theory of the other…so they spit to each other wich make their controller happy: #1 The groups with the nano termate theory (AE9/11) #2 The group of Judy Wood with the directed energy weapon AKA Hutchison effect, effect nobody can reproduce not even Dr. Judy Wood (Rich Planet support this theory) …But both group agree plane were involve, at least on the WTC and flight 93…The best to explain the fake airplane is Ace Baker with “The Key” as keyword…
Allan the danger of controller opposition like Alex Jones or AE for 9/11 more Bullshit is they give a illusion something happen, it give a false feeling that at least you are informed…but the criminal dont give a dam shit if a couple of millions of people are suspicious. The thing is they know who are suspicious and their level of dangerosity…They build a dam so no real action will be taken…personnaly i wonder why no victim of the Pentagon sue the gov for the lack of response. I mean this is odd the HQ of the most technologicly advanced army hit by a fucking Boeing, BTW you will notice all the attack against the USA wich trigger a declaration of war (Korea was a UN war) the Navy was the target: vs Spain, WW1, WW2, Viet Nam…and 9/11…the plane at the Pentagon (flight 77) hit the Navy wing. You can add the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel to blame Egypt…”Evidence of Treason” on youtube are the best documentary IMHO to sum up many lies
Good info posts friend! (all of your posts always!) – yeah the pile of junk on the ground should have been about 3x higher if I remember rightly – she was all turned to dust before our eyes like magic! lol!.
The SPEED at which they took that wreckage away – and far away- set new world records!! 😀
The dark grey “plane” was another so obvious and in our face proof of weird weaponry – yet hardly a soul seems to notice.
The Pentagon building is a joke – bristling with cameras galore, yet they wont release footage – says it all doesn’t it!?!
Exact no video footage, not even a single image wich identify a Boeing , and nothing you can identify as part of plane in the wreckage, no seat, no clothes from the luggages…But the most funny was Rumsfeld carrying somebody…This piece of devil shit have nothing more important thing to do ? How he knew the attack was finished ? A big joke you got it
We are being hoodwinked.
Everyone saw the towers come down with a Supernal Natural method. No one knows how. No one. We feel an unsettlingly, unknowing of ongoing events that are missing common reasoning.
Again, it’s a fight for our naive eternal consciousness by ‘other’ Intelligence made with ‘artificial’ events. Truth is not a secret. Liars are succeeding in changing what you see, then, what you want to believe, whether you believe it or not. Pick one side even though both are wrong.
Now file it away.
The conflict is multi-dimensional right in front of our eyes. When one sees supernatural events, they have nothing to compare them to. Our minds try to justify the impossible. Now we have technology that proves there’s another intelligence that’s manipulating US. They’re here.
Nothing new here. We always knew it. Our arrogance just can’t accept it. We are much more though than each of us gives ourselves credit for. Who are we? We’re dreamers that are given Truths in those dreams, the good, the bad and the ugly, etc. Beam me up, Scotty.
I think it’s steady as we go into this continued Spiritual growth to overcome ourselves to accept the Power we’ve inherited. It’s hard to see the Truth and not call it something else to compare it to, especially when it defies our own known new ‘science god’.
The fact of the matter is, our Power is not in our force but in our good Spiritual conscience that gives us clarity to ultimately overcome the liars and what they are trying to take from US. If not, one lies for the liar.
Thanks, Allan.
May the Spirit Power be with you
to continue to help us through the deception.
and Stay nitty-gritty… love the photos from
Out there in God’s country…
https://youtu.be/8u7-Ht05v2M
Thanks, Cat. Yes. Yes.
Cannot agree more, i saw the infra world with my own eyes (hundreds of peoples walking with black holes instead of eyes…in desert streets. Was not high on drugs or drunk). But also I recieve a infinite love…it was a love without any physical restriction from a entity i can only describe as a Goddess…And indeed those massive lies are just a manifestation of a other realm, the realm of the damned. Make no sense if otherwise.
“Oh, and damaging a building near the top cannot, by the laws of physics, cause the whole structure to disintegrate.” – Yes and the glaring detail for all engineer/ mechanical types to see was – wafer thin aluminium wings CANNOT slice through massive steel girders!,
– impossible! , but there it was for about 1% of the population to notice & take note of.
And yes again, there is a very long list of “major bloopers” with their whole 911 scene.
Allan, did you know you and Walter look so much like brothers it is incredible!? – twin brothers even.
Bill Cooper summed things up in no uncertain terms too > https://youtu.be/5HEg8maeZ8M
Yes, the list is truly endless, like the Apollo one… and all the other lists.
Hadn’t ever thought Walt and I looked alike but you are right, come to think of it. Mmmmm.
when I read a book that is only cover and advertisement, I literally throw it in the dunghill.
the internet has opened my eyes and I try to denounce the historical lies in writing on the walls of my city.
– brain was lost in JFK autopsy.
– no engine is reliable for landing on the moon.
– 200,000 tons of steel doesn’t melt like butter in 10 seconds.
-advertising has turned the seasonal flu into a monstrous human repression.
-every day Pinocchio appears on television.
I trust and wish that the French will start another revolution like two centuries ago.
take care of yourself a lot.
In France the cops are overwhelme, Forget Paris because its to hard to count, in Paris they have 3 manif. I checked the number of citizen in smaller city and basicly, nearly 2% are at the manifestation (they are bigger this last month) so 2% of 67 millions it is over 1 million, 1 million of human screaming “Macron ton passe on en veut pas” (Macron your pass we dont want) , “Macron en prison”, Check next saturday…the frenchs are angry…last saturday they start scream “Revolution”…but hey the “wasp” nest is USA my friend…if this house is not cleaned, the mess will continu for a while, the 3 letters agency must be terminate…enough of the CIA
Walter’s back-pedaling is indeed, as Kevin says above (below?), a classic. i appreciated your sharing that with us, some years ago now. it was an out-take from Water Time, no?
We (here) have all known this frustration with our ‘smart’ friends, people whom we had come to regard as sensible. The retreat from obvious conclusions feels like a psychological malaise endemic to our times — but i don’t know: did Socrates, maybe, complain about this anywhere ?
I just can’t stand to be around these people… some from 50 years on. Subconsciously scared of the truth – the difference to what they want to believe. Too much to bare apparently.
Hegelian Dialectics in full effect…….it will get much worse before it gets better.
Aloha Allan
Yep, Loos switcheroo is a classic. I saw it twice years ago and last year and now. Allan nailed it. Photo Forensics would back him up. The media archives are full of this stuff. Allan easily shows the absurdity of the Deep State tactics.
I saw the long train in your photo. Driving in SLC today saw a long string of Railroad Oil Tankers parked. Never ever seen that in 30 years near downtown.
The photo with your dog and you chilling in the hammock. Super photo…..thanks!
Up to now the attitude of the PTB seems to be if 1% of the population know the truth then what does it matter so long as the rest believe in the lies they give them. Interestingly as you point out there has been many like Bob Woodward who purposely led many astray who were trying to find the truth. And the thing is these sort of people are highly effective at misdirection. There is simply so many of these characters.
It is only when you figure out what is going on with a big dollop of help from people like yourself who have done excellent critiques of lots of other fake/false truth tellers that you really begin to make progress and it leads you to revisit a lot of basic history and what do you know, it aint as they say it was.
The sens of things now is that they have decided these games are up and from now on they are not going to allow anything out. It just 100% lies. Once covid passes are fully accepted along with cashless society, it is going to be a complete clampdown and nobody is going to recognize the world we live in. The past few decades where some truth could be found for those with the inclination to look for it, is not going to exist anymore.
What can we do? I don’t know. The rot set in a long time ago.
BTW for anyone who wants to download youtube videos to their laptop before they are censored there is a great software tool you can get at this site http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/
Here is another example of ‘history’ that will not exist in the ‘future’:
https://rumble.com/vkdlcl-july-27-2021.html
I just added this:
Addendum (9/12/21): This should have been much more detailed but…. I didn’t see the point. Easiest way to sum up the difference between ‘history’ and How It Really Went is to point out that there were no airliners and hence no hijackings. Oh, and damaging a building near the top cannot, by the laws of physics, cause the whole structure to disintegrate. In ten years, none of this information will exist anywhere, not in writing.
Hi Allan, thanks for your ongoing commentary and analysis. I would like to change your mind. Sort of.
“This should have been much more detailed but…. I didn’t see the point. ”
Geopolitics is definitely one of the most depressing, horrific and nihilistic areas one can work. If you have a soul anyways. And you express this in your writing.
Yes. It will all disappear online. So that’s not where you store it. And this progresses in lock step with fascism, which is the larger issue.
But first, those descendants will know if anyone spoke truth to power. And it matters now in the moment. At least historically, if not in terms of nobility.
Second, we don’t fight because we will win. The cause is lost sir. We fight because these are fascists. We die but the truth lives on.
Take a rest, the world is going nowhere. Enjoy your meandering and let go of it all. It isn’t your fault.
But there is a point definitely. I avoid repeating myself and links are fine. Your comments above had a timeless quality and are very relevant today. Regards.
Allan, this isn’t really something I’d expect someone to have a definitive answer on, but, generally speaking, are you of the opinion that the bodies jumping out of the towers were just more media fakery? I’ve found myself very moved by what I considered to be the, um, plight of one Edna Cintron (standing at here very unfiery office building edge), yet I am now pretty much willing to acknowledge even that could be a deception… and even if it’s mainly only been the cluesforum weasels that I’ve seen discuss it. And yes, I’ve long accepted the towers were controlled demolitions, although in the case of the Pentagon maybe a missile (global hawk?) was used. Thank you Sir….
Not sure of some of the details, like the fall bodies, other than the famous ‘falling man’ photo, which is an obvious fake. completely faked. 100%.
Hey you are dead right again Allan! – I always knew that something was very fake & weird about that photo, but I never dwelled on it enough (was in my subconscious),
– but you calling that fake today – Yes Yes without a doubt!.
Btw, I love these latest photo’s too, and the “woods at noon” is also exquisite.
Yes when I first saw Walter in your Watertime movie way back, I was very much led to believe he was your brother.
What’s a Surfer doing in the mountains anyway? You know you can go blind doing that……
Can I suggest you started going well and truly blind many decades ago, – and now can’t see at all?…
No one blinder than those who don’t want to see.
And even I know you can surf those mountain rivers! – best surfing in the world.
I’ve posted this here before but clearly, especially now, it bears repeating.
First lines of the HBO miniseries – Chernobyl
What is the cost of lies?
It’s not that we’ll mistake them for the truth. The real danger is that if we hear enough lies, then we no longer recognize the truth at all.
What can we do then?
What else is left but to abandon even the hope of truth and content ourselves instead with stories?
In these stories, it doesn’t matter who the heroes are. All we want to know is: “Who is to blame?”
glad to see you back in your wheel house writing well about things of import.
Would enjoy reading an outline of how you see the future (history) going down.
My point is that ‘history’ and ‘the future’ are two completely different concepts.
Did you hear we are burning books up in Canada now? How symbolic.
USA dropped more bombs over Viet Nam than over Japan during WW2. But Viet Nam never attacked US, Macnamara admit Tonkin incident never happen.So the UN in my book is more the UN of USA…About 9/11 the day it happen I was without job, so no hurry to wake up. But I start to feel a strong feeling somethig really bad will happen. I never watch TV Morning News but this day I open my TV around 8:15 gasping my air in nervosity. I was not “disapointed”…when i heard a plane crash in the WTC, when i see the second plane crash i say to myself “somebody will lose is job at NORAD”, but when i heard of the plane crash at the Pentagon i say to myself “this is just impossible, this is staged”…I mean it dont take a genius to know that the primary radar wich worked during WW2 should work 60 years laters. And for so many other reason 9/11 is easily dismiss as a genuine terrosrist attack…I mean its like almost all the bodies just vanished, total vaporisation. The path of fligth 77 is impossible. But anyway so many other fake event after, its a lasagna of lies, layer after layers Boston Bombing, Sandy Hoax, Las Vegas, Fort Lauderdale airport, Christchurch…very easy to debunk and no journalist will investigate because they are all squeeze by their balls. Honest judges, honest cops, honest high rank soldier are rare like unicorn…And now we have a President wich say “my patient is running thin” and made 80 millions of citizen the scape goat of a fully created pandemic…when he say “this is the pandemic of the unvaccinated” he declare war to the unvaccinated…this is simply trully amazing, and in my book Biden pass the line and made the first move, he made a move against 80 millions of citizens
Well done summation, especially using a second language.
Thank you Allan to forgive me for my mistake…I try not to use Google translate. But you got my points. On FB english grammar nazi are legion
You won’t find that on sites with an international audience. Great comment. I have nothing to add to it.
I don’t think your friend did a switcheroo so much as a rethought a day later. As how is this going to affect my life going forward. I would suggest looking at yahoo and what they are perpetrating. Four conservative radio host have supposedly died from covid. They are on the attack of trying to convince you can’t get treated at the hospitals because they are being filled up with covid patients. They mandate to get shot up and medical and first responders and nurses are walking away from the profession. When you look at the fallback to the vaccine in Cal.(They are the ones fighting back right now) just imagine. They are lying about the percentages that took the jab.
I guess the same thing with your fried and 9/11. They are counting on people going with the flow as to avoid the blowback from standing up to the obvious.
Indeed, less medical staff is perfect to increase the number of casualities, you will notice they dont mandate the vaxxin for the militaries and the cops…they need them in great number
How does this make sense, Bill?: ‘I don’t think your friend did a switcheroo so much as a rethought a day later.’
He saw the truth then ignored what he had seen. How is this a ‘rethought’ when there was no actual thinking involved?
You being the gadfly he decided not to get involved with on said subject.