It’s about waaay more than this bullshit.
The concept of causation is of such importance that I wanted to start the meat of my analyses of Dangerous and Who Built the Moon? (plus how they relate to the idea of a ‘Higher Power’), with a formal examination of ‘Chance & Necessity’, including what these words really mean and how – when we rule them out, causally – they bring us to ‘intelligent design’, another scare quote-worthy term, based on all its baggage from the evolution/creation brouhaha.
But, being beleaguered by the sort of writer’s block that is more a fear of getting it wrong than an inability to write, I’m going to move on and hope that by concentrating on more simplistic/mundane observations I’ll shake lose what I want to say about this ‘deeper,’ more abstract notion. We’ll see.
I believe I’ve shown you as best I can (however briefly) that Dangerous is a book very consciously crafted to misdirect us while exposing the profound level of occult obsession underlying the events of September 11, 2001. The book’s wry, blackly comic tone is that of a high school year book put out by beer-sodden student athletes after winning the state championships; notwithstanding the occasional half-hearted scolding of the perps (mostly via adjectives like ‘wicked’), a winning team’s braggadocio fairly leaps off the pages, which also include copious and very carefully chosen imagery to further drive home a smug self-satisfaction, along with an implied ‘insult to injury’ affront.
The title of Chapter One is a good example of how Bain uses easily identifiable cultural allusions to make the horrors he describes have a smugly arrogant yet accessible resonance.
Chapter One: Author! Author!
In case you don’t get Bain’s drift, google the term and you’ll find that…
Author! Author! is a 1982 American comedy-drama film directed by Arthur Hiller, written by Israel Horovitz, and starring Al Pacino, Dyan Cannon and Tuesday Weld. The film, which is loosely autobiographical, concerns a Broadway playwright who strives to solve his family and relationship troubles while trying to get a new play into production. (Wikipedia)
So, a comedy-drama is what we’re describing, according to ‘our’ author, Kenny Bain. And indeed, he starts the chapter thusly:
Act One, Scene One:
American Airlines Flight 11 And The North Tower, September 11, 2001. 8:43 a.m. The Boeing 767 descended rapidly through the cloudless sky, its intended target looming larger and larger in the cockpit window. 1500 feet. 1400. 1300. JFK International Airport was 10 miles away—to the southwest. In any case, the plane was moving fartoo fast to be coming in for a landing. 1200 feet. 1100.
Grade school physics tells us that an aluminum aircraft could not have created this gash through solid steel facade columns.
Although the ‘comedy’ aspects are patiently waiting in the wings, we open with drama. However, as we all presumably know (anyone reading this blog), none of the above breathlessly crafted ‘stage direction’ (a movie script term) actually occurred on 9/11. It’s right from the ‘official story’ as we were subjected to in the 9/11 Commission Report. As I previously mentioned, by mixing astounding (and true) observations – thereby gaining our trust — with passages like the above, Bain, like countless propagandists before (and since) him, hammers home lie after lie, until the reader’s subconscious surrenders to the bullshit. Classic limited hangout (LH)/disinformation/misdirection.
For more examples of cultural allusions I’ll stick with Dangerous chapter titles (otherwise, this essay would be endless): Aside from Author! Author!, we have ‘Atta Boy’ (describing ‘hijacker’ Mohammed Atta), The Usual Suspects (another movie title), Get Your Goat (slang), The Greatest Show on Earth (a circus), No Guts, No Glory (slang), Bizzaro-World (a Superman allusion), A Loud Squawk (an aviation term as bird call pun), Déjà Voodoo (a pun), That Old Black Magic (song title), Are You Sirius? (a pun, ‘Serius’ being the name of a dead dog and an important star), Annie Get You Gun (a Broadway musical), Showdown at the A-Z Corral (an ‘historical’ pun), Pike’s Peek (a misspelling-pun, plus reference to a different ‘Pike’), Two Heads Are Better Than One (a gory pun), Born Under a Bad Sign (a song title)…
…I’ve still got a bunch of pages to riffle through, but enough is enough, and I’ve only included those titles ‘cleverly’ laden with the sort of multiple meanings/cultural allusions that are the root of NLP (linguistic mind control) and occult machinations.
Turn the page from ‘Author! Author!’ and we begin the serious misdirection/deceit married with occult ‘revelation of method’…
But clever multi-level punning is mind control 101, beginner’s stuff. To truly grasp the profound level of deceit-in-the-midst-of-truth Dangerous represents, we need only to turn the page with Author! Author! at the top (p 13); we then find ourselves looking at what surely must be a representation of some real truth, i.e., a photograph! In fact, it’s a photograph we’ve all seen before, the one known world-wide as ‘The Falling Man.’ Take a look. Horrible as it is (or would be if…), at least this is… true. I mean… it’s… reality… Right?
Some news: There is nothing true about this photograph — and Bain, being the diligent researcher that he is, should know this. But does he bust this image for the fraud that it is? In a whole page of text on it… no, he does not, as he does not bust the ‘plane’ images for the frauds they are. (More about this in a bit.) I’ll quote him briefly (p 147) — but in this case you cannot read the whole description at the pdf I found. For some reason, that page is deleted (it’s a tinted sidebar so maybe there is ‘an innocent’ reason for the omission).
…in this mass ritual we’ve encountered various Tarot Cards that were ‘brought to life’ – or otherwise incorporated – into the script. The Tower, The Devil, The Star, etc. Well, add one more to the list because The Falling Man is the twelfth card in the Tarot, The Hanged Man, depicted in three dimensions for all the world to see and fortuitously (my emphasis) captured on film for posterity.
‘[The similarity in body position] is neither coincidence nor synchronicity; rather, it is yet another example of the twisted humor and sophisticated logistics employed in the 9/11 MegaRitual.’ (From ‘Dangerous’, page 34)
For me, as a decent photographer (with too many magazine credits to list here), a cursory look at the photo raised a question, the first I always ask myself in photo-analyses: From what locale did the photographer snap the shutter? Looking at the image, the angle clearly shows that the photog must have been in another building on a floor close to the height of the falling man. (We can rule out a helicopter.) Look and see if you agree. No doubt, right? The picture was shot from the same height-off-ground as the subject.
Luckily, the photo being so famous (it made Time’s ‘The 100 Most Influential Images of All Time’ list), the credited photographer, Richard Drew, is featured in several videos about the photo. Like this one by the Brit newspaper, The Telegraph.
Drew says he was on West Street adjacent to ‘BDIPlus’ on the map: Less than 400 feet from the North Tower. He would have been pointing his camera almost straight up.
As Drew clearly and unequivocally states, he took the photo from on the ground on West Street. But hold on. This is not possible (see map), since Drew was no more than 3-400 feet from the tower. If he was where he claims he was, he’d be shooting up, almost straight up. So right from the get-go we have a problem.
Back in about 2008-09, when I really looked into 9/11, i.e., when I first realized that ‘truther heroes’ like David Ray Griffin were ‘missing’ some obvious shit, the above anomaly was my reason for examining the photo more closely. (Also, there was something about it that didn’t feel right.) Then, boom! A-ha! and I knew the photo was a full-blown fabrication: The corner of the WTC is beveled from top to bottom, meaning that at no point do two sides join as we see in the photo (I’ve deeply verified this).
But it gets worse.
Addendum: Since we already know that the photo is a fabrication, how could it get worse? This is actually a good question.
PLEASE click to enlarge, then give it a good look. The fuzzy outline around the figure is a dead giveaway that the photo is a fraud.
I plugged the best Net reproduction of the image into Photoshop and blew it up. Click to enlarge the image to the right and notice the fuzzy border that surrounds ‘the falling man’; it’s especially noticeable below his black pant leg and around the curve of his face/head. It’s a pretty good job of laying an image over a background – much better than they did it back in the Apollo days – but the fakery technique is obvious.
This is the bevel from ground level. There is NO WHERE on the WTC where the sides abut directly as in Drew’s photo. QED, a fake background.
This is what I mean when I say that nothing about the photo is ‘true’: that’s not the WTC in the background and the ‘man’ is an image from somewhere else. Plus, as I say, the side-angle of the subject would be impossible to get from where the photog claims to have been.
Drew gets around, historically. Proof of nothing. Just sayin…
As I listened to Richard Drew’s various interviews (the photo made him famous), I tried to pick up cues as to when and how he’d gotten involved in The Falling Man hoax. I was already suspicious of him for having taken another well-known historical photo – the one of Robert Kennedy lying on the floor of the Ambassador Hotel right after he’d been shot.
I got a couple hints in this interview: A big one came as Drew tells us that when The Falling Man first appeared publicly, in The (good old) New York Times on September 12th, the morning edition — the day after 9/11, he did not get photo credit.
Given the occult importance (to the perps) of the image, I suspect that the photo was ‘created’ before the day of 9/11 and was inserted into the Times by one of their operatives. In one of the many little fuckups with which an op of this complexity is going to be rife, they’d forgotten about the credit problem and had to scramble to find someone they trusted, failing to make the deadline for the Times morning edition. (This all but unheard of credit-omission was ‘fixed’ in future uses of the image. To quote Drew directly: ‘Someone very close to me straightened that out with the New York Times.’ ‘Someone very close’ indeed. Like maybe his handler?)
This Richard Drew wide angle shot from his position on the street gives away the game: The beveling, the low angle: ‘The Falling Man’ is an impossible image.
Another little hint was Drew’s mention of his AP (Associated Photography) editor, ‘Mike,’ whom he had never mentioned in any previous descriptions of his first look at the photos that day. Significantly, as Drew lets slip, Mike ‘passed away yesterday.’ (So he couldn’t contradict Drew’s story.)
Given the no-photo-credit omission, and given that the photo was likely created by a higher level technician than Drew, I assume Drew was unaware of the ‘existence’ of the photo until the next day (9/12), when he saw it in the paper, plus was ‘paid a visit’ by… someone. Someone who explained what they needed: A pro shooter who wouldn’t mind a little instant fame. (The lack of photo credit on 9/12 was vital in my coming to this conclusion. Photo credits are a big deal, rarely if ever omitted in newspaper stories.)
A screen grab from the Telegraph video: Why try to confuse us with this image of… nothing?
And I’ll tell you what: Watch the Telegraph video linked above and notice how — while in voice over Drew describes his trek to West Street — they do a blurry, confusing pan down a building that is not the WTC but sort of looks like it: The videographers are doing their best to misdirect us from the obvious fact that The Falling Man photo was not taken from the ground at West Street (or anywhere else). Point being that the British Newspaper The Telegraph (the producers of the video) know damn well the photo is a fake – a great example of how the MSM all stick together in their fraudulent reporting of history.
The Apollo photo-frauds were not as well done as is possible nowadays with Photoshop.
Addendum: The incredible hubbub the photo caused – over whether it should even be seen or not – was the perfect way to ensure it was seen, and by as many people world-wide as possible. The ‘moral dilemma’ that everyone was shouting about was precisely what the perps were going for, in terms of their occult agenda. And it just never stops. The Esquire story — about ‘the identity’ of The Falling Man (can you also hear the phrase as ‘The Fall of Man’?) – is from 2016; Drew’s interview with B&H was from 2017; the Telegraph story was from 2011. You may be thinking, ‘What’s the point?’; in fact, you may wonder this about all the bizarre occult blathering and imagery, but what you wonder about is irrelevant. The difference is that you do not live in the same occult/moral universe as the perps of 9/11. Don’t ever forget that.
Okay, what can we learn from the story of the fraudulent ‘The Falling Man’ photo?
Wait. Hold on. I gotta ask you a couple related questions first. I’ve asked you this before and I’m asking again: Am I the smartest guy on the planet? (I can hear the giggles from my campsite in outback Arizona.) Another question: Have you heard from any other ‘truth types’ that ‘The Falling Man’ is fraudulent? No? Just me, right? And now that you look at it, it’s pretty obvious that the photo is a fake, right? I mean to anyone with any photo-knowledge, plus some critical thinking…
Yes, REMEMBER! Remember that at no location do the sides of the WTC towers touch, as in ‘The Falling Man’.
Remind you of something else about 9/11? Remember I told you that I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m wrong about the motive for everyone avoiding the ‘no planes’ issue, as obvious and important as it is? I was thinking it was to keep media fakery out of the discussion, right?
Nah. Media fakery is no more important to the perps than the absurd notion that they might actually stand trial for their horrendous crime. Here’s why they don’t want you to know about ‘The Falling Man’ or the no planes truth: If this fakery came to light, it would do mischief to the occult agenda behind the events of 9/11/01.
I was going to put off this observation until you were properly informed of the… absurd occultist lengths… the… the almost preternatural attention to the minutest of devilish details, that are screaming at us from every 9/11 angle we examine… See, you need to know this stuff to properly suss motive.
One more time: Compare this with a real WTC photo showing adjoining sides.
‘The Falling Man’? It wasn’t the image itself that was/is so vital; more importantly, it’s the lengths they go to in order to imprint its meaning into your subconscious. And, as noted, they are still doing it! Google ‘The Falling Man’ and see how many hits you get. Never mind, I’ll do it for you: 360,000,000. More than a third of a billion. And ‘The Falling Man’ is just one little tiny minor occult detail in the meta-evil picture. I mean aside from the big stuff – as with, say, the history and occult meanings of the numbers 9 1 1…
Let me ask you this: Do you think it was a coincidence that ‘9 1 1’ is what you dial in an emergency and is how we refer to the events of that day? (Yes, I’m sort of worming my way back to the subject of Chance & Necessity…) From Google:
In November 1967 (my emphasis), the FCC met with the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) to find a means of establishing a universal emergency number that could be implemented quickly. In 1968, AT&T announced that it would establish the digits 9-1-1 (nine-one-one) as the emergency code throughout the United States. (Google ‘911 + emergency’)
Enlarge and read the first paragraph. It could be right out of an occultist analysis of ‘The Hanged Man’ card. Is this wording by Chance, or by Necessity? Neither? Must be something else…
Now ask yourself why no other country in the world, aside from Saudi Arabia(!) (plus our little squire, Canada), uses this numerical combination for emergencies. It makes no sense: Especially with the old rotary phones (from 1967), the ‘9’ is as far from the ‘1’ as you can get. And back when an emergency number was created, the ‘9’ took the longest time to dial. ‘911’ makes no sense. (‘112’ is the most common. Easy to remember and quick to dial, the ‘1’ being so close to the ‘2,’ and no lost time as the 9 has to rotate all the way around the dial.)
To an occultist fanatic, ‘9 1 1’ is as profound a combination of numbers as you can find, on one level meaning, literally, ‘Evil Magick.’ Look it up.
Can you imagine the machinations here? The long range attention to detail? Neither can I. But can’t is different from won’t. If we won’t believe in the detail machinations, then we’re fools.
Are you starting to get the idea of what Bain and his overlords are trying to tell you? Really, folks, ‘you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!’ — as Bain himself would put it. In fact, here’s how he does put it:
“Coincidence can be summoned. It’s a matter of attention and timing.” All too true, and we haven’t even gotten to the [flight] numbers, symbols and other occult elements yet, where we’ll find [still] more… mockery. [my emphasis, ‘Dangerous, p. 55]
Enlarge and note the other side of ‘Dangerous,’ the NLP way of mocking us.
As we’ll see, a major element of the occult symbolism of 9/11 lies in the flight numbers, every one of which has big time occultist significance. Think about it: If enough of us understood that there were no actual planes, the occult significance of the flight numbers would go… poof!
…need I further blurt my point on the real reason ‘no planes’ is anathema to the PTB (and thus to their big name ‘truther’ cohorts, plus the persistent sock puppet flunky commenters on this blog)?
Allan
An example of the far reach of Drew’s photograph (via ‘dirty bastards’ and Useful Idiots) is Don DeLillo’s 2007 novel, Falling Man. This is from Wiki:
Throughout the book, Lianne sees a performance artist dubbed “Falling Man” in various parts of the city. Wearing business attire, he suspends himself upside-down with rope and a harness in the pose of the man in the famous photograph of the same name by Richard Drew.
Yep, here too.
North Tower at about the time of ‘Drew’s photo’ and likewise shot from the north. Does the sun/shade on the two sides match? Why is Drew’s reversed, the sunlight on the right side, shadow on the left? I know: About here you could throw a flag for ‘piling on’.
By the way, an unimportant little ‘synchronicity’: AP (Associated Photography) photog Richard Drew is a good friend/associate of my Montauk buddy Walter.
Thаnk you fߋr some other fantastic poѕt. Where else may just anybody get thаt type of infߋ
in sucһ a pｅrfeсt mɑnner of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and
I’m at tһe look for such infօrmation.
HEY FOLKS, HERE’S A GOOD EXAMPLE OF A BOT COMMENT…. (i deleted the URL included at the end)
Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thank you, However
I am going through troubles with your RSS. I don’t know the reason why I can’t subscribe to it.
Is there anyone else getting similar RSS problems?
Anyone that knows the solution will you kindly respond?
Thanks!!
Oh, hey, look what I found:
http://corruption-usa.com/disinfo-report-miles-w-mathis-is-fake-news-merlins-cave-is-tavistock-cointelpro-dont-shoot-til-you-see-the-whites-of-his-eyes/
“[….]What first gives this away as a fake news is the shear output. One blogger who was equally annoyed by these scammers, estimated 300,000 words in 50+ articles — equivalent to 5 or 10 books — that look into deep state crimes, plus an initial ouvre around art criticism and an entirely separate vein of articles on alternative physics. It’s just too much for one man to type; his fingers would bleed.”
That “One blogger” phrase is a hyperlink — to this blog and the Open Letter to Miles, part one. Then it mentions Allan’s catch of the Britishisms, and repeats the link.
Goes on to ask (and answer) who/what does “Miles Mathis” *avoid* talking about?
Very interesting exposé of the falling man definitely connected with the tarot card.As I am new on this site could you give me your take on simon shack and September clues ?
I’ve linked to this before. She goes a little too far in a couple places but otherwise is quite on the money:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZh8rckCTzc
By the way, According to Mailchimp, I’ve gotten one new subscriber since starting frequent posts and lost about 50 or so. On top of that, not one new monthly contributor (a measly $3.25) since my increase in output; plus I actually had a cancellation yesterday. Not sure what this means, given that I think my info is generally good. Not that I care that much but I’ve always thought that if you do good work, readers will find you. Maybe not so much…
Allan – you are hard to find! Like a needle in the haystack.
I can only explain one possibility for the lack of interest due to my personal experience is that I went thru 4-5 years of ancillary 911 research of always looking for something better, more credible, more evidence, etc. Once I became aware of a few other anomalies (hoaxes) like Sandy Hook, Boston, the Moon, the Holocaust, this triggered a much more aggressive and time exhaustive effort on my part that lasted for another 2-3 years until I found your website. And, I only stumbled onto you because of a Corbett Report ‘subscriber’ calling himself HomeRemedySupply who told me not to look somewhere! Ha. I still recall finding and watching the video of you exposing Corbett for the fraud he is…
Keep up the great work Allan!
Funny. ‘HomeRemedySupply’ is one of Corbett’s puppets (you can tell by his posts). Funny that he thought by telling you not to go somewhere, you wouldn’t. I’m curious re the context, since I know my Open Letter is a major aggravation. How did the subject come up? (I’ve tried to join Corbett’s forum, but he sends back my money. I wonder why.)
By the way, seeing Corbett for what he is opened my mind to the realization that most ‘name’ alt media outlets are LH. Aside from his NLP-laden speech at Kuala Lumpur, the sheer volume of his output is a big tell. (That most of his info is good is another eye-opener, but that’s a long story…)
In summary, it was originally about Fetzer’s questionable work (when I brought up the Nuke idea + Sandy Hook + Boston and all his books) towards 911 truth movement. He stated that Fetzer had “dissed” James Corbett in a video, but wouldn’t give me the link because, get this “…I don’t want to validate it with video views.” !?!
After searching for an hour or two, I finally found it. It was with YOU and Fetzer (I think discussing the NLP of Corbett’s work). I was thinking to myself, who the hell is Allen? I gotta find out. So, there went my entire weekend looking at your work and haven’t stopped. This around 9/11 2017…
I knew I had been played… The shills certainly took over that discussion quickly. It was so obvious now that I look back on it, but not while it was going down. – I was naive. Didn’t realize most of the outlets were LH’s.
Each 911 yearly event certainly brings out the filth.
I can see why he wouldn’t give you that link! Good for you for digging it up. (Now, of course, I don’t trust Fetzer either…)
Just for the sake of it – an Open Letter made me find your size, too.
For me, it was Miles Mathis. I grew suspicious because he seemed too much jack-of-all-trades to me. Some essays seemed very weel researched, and others mainly weak conjectures. Not to mention his tremendous output.
Write more open letters to out the Fake Alt-Media, and the subscribers will come … 😉
BTW, I came across Corbett as well. I dropped him some weeks later, because of his snake-oil-seller voice. His videos always reminded me of insurance or used-car salesmen.
Obviously, I’m more the intuitive guy.
If it wasn’t for the surf vibe and the amalgamation of saltwater zen, wave & tube metaphysics in your 1st couple books, I wouldn’t be hanging out in this dustbin of evaporated bilgewater. With that being said I’m here, I’m amused & if you don’t mind,..I feel inclined to banter a bit.
So it wasn’t the long and rambling digressions in your ‘Dangerous’ review that interested me as much as your little comment in regards to the youtube link you posted…. when you summarized your worldview by saying “She goes a little too far in a couple places but otherwise is (quite on the money)” Wow.
Had this blog turned into an echo chamber for the “highly suggestable but serious minded” conspiracy theory, personality type????
Now if your heart rate has increased a few bpms and your stress response is starting to kick in… hopefully it’s more like a rollercoaster or a scary, freakshow movie stress response. As opposed to a chronic & debilitating stress response that starts with nail biting but eventually leads to chewing off finger tips while loosely monitoring a debilitating peanut butter & bacon pizza addiction… I digress. ……… *Smiling* *waiving*
…………… …………….. …………….. …………….
ok Ok… So when you say she is “quite on the money”(911). How reliable is she? How reliable is the source of the claim? Does she make a lot of similar claims? Have any of her claims been verified by somebody else and does this fit with the way the world works? I mean can anybody honestly answer these questions???? But…..
One of my biggest questions is – has anyone tried to disprove her actual claims? & If so where does the preponderance of evidence point?
Is she playing by the rules of science & if not does verifiable evidence even exist? If so does verifiable evidence exist?
Also… Is there a chance personal beliefs are driving this claim??? Is it possible that thing called “confirmation bias” is driving the bus? The motive fallacy meter was blinking red a few times… & u know how one can influence the other. Or is it the other way around:) Keeping in mind correlation doors not equal causation.
Cheers Alan!
Ps. please write another surf book! Actually I’ll buy any book you write..
Take care
Jamie
My reaction wasn’t my heart rate but my eyes drooping. As much time as it took to come up with your comment, it still needs work. I mean:
‘One of my biggest questions is – has anyone tried to disprove her actual claims? & If so where does the preponderance of evidence point?’
Which claims do you refer to? How would you disprove the existence of the Life magazine, where the watch hands point and so forth? How do you refute observations? Whether you believe they represent dots to be connected is likewise not a matter that can be proved or disproved….
In terms of “where the watch hand points” is a pattern that she focused on and connected to form a narrative. If we spend time looking for patterns we’ll find them. We are pattern seeking, social, hierarchical primates with an advanced cortex that enables us to alter the world we live in. If we can alter the biology, chemistry, geography, physiology, society, behavior, psychology, zoology, mineralogy, oceanography,.. of the world & reality we live in,…..why wouldn’t we be able to pick out a temporal pattern on picture of a man wearing a watch, & attach significance to any number of narratives. Seeing agency collectively behind events is what our brains are hard wired to do. In the hostile & unforgiving world of antiquity this was an adaptive cognitive skill that enabled our ancestors to survive and succeed. We live in a complex world with endless number, word, & symbol patterns that may seem compelling. We are experts at attaching collective agency but just because we find enough significant correlation to construct a narrative does not mean it exists as causal reality. However if the correlation is verifiable through multiple, independent fields of inquiry then we can agree with certainty that we are experiencing/understanding the effects of causal reality.
If there is power in belief, and attention (and I have seen that there is), then there is power in withdrawing belief and attention. Let’s add emotion: belief and attention provide the “shape”, if you will, and emotion supplies the energy.
If Bain is indeed revealing what They believe and what They have arranged in order to hijack our attention (making us complicit), I think it’s important to consider his information with detachment, without allowing our feelings to be hijacked as well. We may have to give attention in order to know what we are dealing with, but we can do so with cool heads.
We can consign them to the gallows without getting worked up about it. It’s better that way: calling for vengeance out of rage or anguish is only to be expected, and there are many cases where we regret it, once we’ve “cooled off”. But giving a sober and thoughtful evaluation and *still* calling for vengeance — that truly means something.
Allan~ I’m reading the blogs here and notice for the first time your “icon” has changed.
Did you change your Icon? or was/is it someone else?
(See this below in the comments):
It was your comment following the comment of Dave Clark October 4, 2018 at 2:40 am
Here:
Allan Weisbecker
October 2, 2018 at 6:13 pm
Good catch re ‘Israel’! I hadn’t gone that deep….
I never created an icon to begin with…
Mellyrn,
How can there be any talk about power without identifying what that power serves? I think it matters what is believed, and what dominates our attention, and what stirs our emotions, but without knowing what you mean by power, I would not know how to proceed. Someone may assume, that because you reference revelation of the method, that all your concepts of power are pejorative. Without laboring on the difference between personal power and political power, I see no reason to conclude that what gains our attention makes us complicit in any sense of the word.
Also, what will be gained by vengeance, no matter how coolly applied, when the pervasive moral and intellectual degradation continues to make their machinations effective.
By “power” I only mean, ability to influence, to cause. A hammer, a lever, a pulley increase our physical power. Using a hammer to knock someone over the head is not favorite, but when outfitting a handyman our concern with murder is usually limited to, ‘Let’s be careful how we swing that, OK?’
In this instance I’m thinking neither of personal nor political power, but straight-up magical power. I believe I’ve seen it in action, but even if I’m just nuts, *They* apparently believe in magical power. And if They believe, They are going to perform magical rituals. I think this is what Bain is saying.
Here it’s been suggested that, for ritual use, They need, or believe They need, awareness of, attention to, things like specific numbers, and this Tarot-esque image. I also get the idea that the more emotional the attention, the more it — ?charges? — whatever it is They think they’re doing.
I don’t know if it does or not — I’m not “concluding” that it does — but just in case it does, I’d like to say, ‘Let’s be careful how we view that, OK?’
And I don’t believe in the utility of vengeance myself — even though I can see that sometimes someone needs to be pulled from the game for excessive roughness.
Does that help?
When you asked if that helped, I wasn’t sure how you meant it. I could easily imagine it to mean bug off, or instead, a level inquiry about what I comprehend about it. It’s no picnic for me to try and conversationally shake down my own ideation about the dominant topic or life in general in a public forum. It has become necessary because of what I see as a broadscale condition of culture in ruins. It was a culture that we are mostly guessing at. Around here there is no public discourse of any consequence. It’s become one big, vapid, anxiety provoking howyadoin, and after that the nothing. If that ruination was complete it would make no sense to even try to make sense. It’s like a bombed out city where there still exists structures intact enough to make temporary shelter possible. Now, when we talk about things that were once important and unquestionable to us, we find the import still intact, but our conveyance of meaning suffers from corrupted vocabularies, leaving us no choice other than the tedium of makeshift attempts to establish context. Culture as a term that has it’s history, and had everything to do with peace and cohesion among those who depend on it, and culture as it is commonly used are confused and they shouldn’t be. An anticulture is active and thoroughly disguised with the accouterments of what it artfully simulates in appearance.
So, what these occulted entities have been intending all along is the destruction of the long evolutionary development of those behaviors that structure our very survival. Our language, our words, our concepts, our wealth, our trees, water, food, air, progeny, quality of life; in short, everything that is ours or could be ours, is all in their sites. And so where is the alarm. It may be screaming like the sirens we hear so much in the city, and after a while we don’t hear them so much, and they cease to be the nerve grating thing they are intended to be.
I think this could be worked into a theory of how paralyzing anxiety is created. When anyone hears the alarm and knows the consequence of ignoring it, while also expected to act as if there is no alarm, the two signals are so dissonant that neither fight or flight is decidable.
This letter is open.
Right/Left politically – they are the same. Choosing one or the other is no choice at all. The PTB’s plan of destruction by overtaking culture/society through cognitive dissonance strikes a nerve with me. In particular, anxiety caused by the natural instinct of fight or flight that is being desensitized by the flooding of unreality being reality. Movies, violence, drugs, music, sirens, and all sorts of high frequencies that are part of every day life has nullified the alarm. By the time the alarm sounds, there will be no one to hear it – or who wants to hear it. This is the goal of the PTB – complete surrender without ever firing a shot.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
Hmm. Well, in asking “does that help?” I did mean simply, did I answer you? and not anything snarky.
As to “where is the alarm?” I myself feel no alarm. I do see things I don’t like, even things I hate. If I can do something — something that I *know* will help, and will not make things worse — then I do that. And if I can’t do something, I don’t sweat it: getting alarmed doesn’t help me think.
The difference between the per side column count when comparing the The Falling Man background and pictures of the actual building is staggering. The lighter side of the FM facade counts to 12 which matches the 12th card named the Hanged Man in the Tarot deck. The man is directly on the 12th column when counting from right to left, perhaps for emphasis. The real building had 59 columns per side. Staggering! Much grateful for this work.
Different venues crop the photo in different ways — you should take this into account. According to Drew (which means little) it was originally horizontally shot. Makes sense to crop it as a vertical. Etc.
Ok I see where I improperly assumed a city and skyscape background which turns out to be your desktop. Thanks
‘Our little squire’ ?!
Yeowtcch !
This is not my view. It’s the way the PTB see it. No offense from this end!
Your excellent article prompted me to look a little deeper into The B-Thing, which is a book about the actual op of the same name that links directly in this conspiracy theory to the Falling Man Hoax; which is something you probably know well, as I write as if you and anyone else listening, is a crash test dummy who just came alive yesterday. The four man group that performed this piece of scarequote performance art called themselves Gelatin, who were Austrian rutabaga farmers, I mean Israeli art students, I mean there is a grab-bag of attributions of what exactly was this four man group who sometimes posed with climbing gear and covered their man-tits with bras, and who, if considered speculatively, are the ones who threw some dummies from a balcony they designed, built and installed in a window opening on the 91st floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center, to be recorded from the Monolithic Hilton Hotel across the way, and after that by helicopter. If yall want to see them sporting their man tools and man bras go here: (no porn, I swear): https://www.markdotzler.com/Mark_Dotzler/Gelitin_NYT.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw-YX_Cht9U (Another look at the godam book.)
If you decide to look at the book, please note how un-artful it is. These guys couldn’t draw a shaking stick. This POS can be purchased from Amazon for a mere $631.08 used.
The ‘falling man’ looks like greenscreen, and some of the fallers are perhaps gelatin filled dummies thrown out from that makeshift balcony that Gelatin created. Or, it was a harmless prank performed by cats who had construction passes and live-in permission in the alleged strike zone of the North Tower for some 4 years leading up to 9/11, issued at least in part by the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council.
Thank you Allan for diving into this deep revealing … I can sense the huge thought field [‘Cause & Necessity’] you are negotiating & sharing with us. It’s opening chambers of our minds we rarely enter & play in, since the destruction of the Renaissance by the Vatican [“Eros & Magic in the Renaissance” by Ioan P. Couliano]. It may be the turning point for many to glean a ‘How’ this media fabric of illusion is being create.
Not to pile on but I noticed another glaring anomaly … the figure is perfectly straight with arms at sides also perfectly straight {not flailing} and holding onto something ‘must be important! To me it seems, if you inverted the man he would be walking up steps ….. carrying a newspaper???
Side note .. new show on Fox it’s title “911” way to have the TRAUMA just keep on giving!
Yep, looks like an inverted guy walking up stairs. No planes, no falling man… See, we’re spoiling their ‘grimoire’…
Great work on this writing, A.W.. The detail of the beveled corners on the buildings is a huge reveal! Thanks for revealing it. Now many would look at the “falling man” and not realize his position is at the corner of the structure where that distinctive bevel should be visible. In the cropped shots, the appearance is given of one flat side of a quadrilateral building, when in fact, the man is positioned at a corner or very close to it. There is likely some occult significance to the juxtaposition of the cross-legged man at a corner. (We turned a corner after 9ll, to give one simple example from a non-occult person.)
Now the expanded view of the photo cock up shows the corner of a building with an apparent “butt joint”. This is a term that is used in cabinet or box making wherein one board of wood is simply glued and abutted against the other board to make the simplest of corners.
We can plainly see that the corners of the WTC towers featured artful beveled edges all the way up on all four corners.
Makes the picture an obvious fake.
Allan is spot on about the crediting of photos. I had a friend working for Reuters at that time who’s sole job was to scour newspaper articles to find any Reuters photos that may have been uncredited. That day the job was particularly upsetting for obvious reasons. The point being that uncredited photos are a big deal. The irregularity of the light and shade is likely explained by poetic licence due to the necessity to have the fall of man facing the dark side. Allan has also picked up but not explicitly pointed out the alternative reading of the Author Author! reference implied by the synopsis – namely Israel (the author) solving his ‘family and relationship troubles (with the US and Palestine?) by getting a new play in to production (war on terror?)
8 minute youtube on The Pet Goat* with a side screen of Bush in the class room on the morning of 9-11. Very interesting eye opener….(turn up sound so you can hear the teacher and the children’s response):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tigxo8sgNUE
*The Pet Goat is an animated film that was released in 2012
Kim, yes, Heliofant’s animated film is brilliant: Bush’s refusal to interrupt ‘The Pet Goat’ reading is a reference to Satan’s ‘sacred’ works (which must not be interrupted)… be my guest if you have a more specific interpretation, using the details of the ‘kid’s story. I suspect every aspect of it had some significance to the perps.
1. There were some VERY important words that the teacher [Mrs Sandra Daniels] was asked to read to the children while President Bush sat nearby.
The 5 (five) specific words that had to be read. The 5 (five) words were most likely CODE words [of which the POTUS probably knew – yet he will deny he knew] which are:
i) KITE
ii) HIT
iii) STEEL
iv) PLANE
v) MUST
(Note in the video the teachers pen whipping that paper after EVERY word!)
2. The book from which the story was read was very carefully selected: “THE PET GOAT” – as in PAN as in BEL as in BAPHOMET as in the SATANIC GOAT of MENDES of Senior FREEMASONRY[“ILLUMINATI”]!
Each new rabbit hole I venture down reveals another aspect of 911 that was carefully planned to minute detail. This can become – no…. actually, this IS addicting!
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
What are the odds of these words essentially matching the main-event of the century, including the timing AS it was goin’ down!…. It’s all TOO obvious to us.
I guess the PTB felt it may be too close to the real-deal had they NOT substituted plane with kite (they both are flying weak objects, however). Hell – even if they had, people still wouldn’t consider it anything out of the ordinary. The sheeple around here are just completely zombified.
Going deeper still Kimberlie – the occult concept of an ‘egregore’ and Satan being just that – a thought form designed to act as a false god for the would be controllers to bow to (think 2nd/ 3rd generation parents repeating the abuse unto their children) and through ritual a never ending supply of loosh energy…
Simple observation. Teachers choose the books they read in reading circle, not politicians. Even if the US president is visiting that day, the teacher would choose the book. Is there proof otherwise?
I’ve given you a pdf of the book. Read even half of it then say that. If you can. And if you can, frankly, something is wrong…
And by the the way, why no comment on my essay? Are you going to say the photo is real? If not, do you not see the implications regarding who chose the goat story? Pu-lease.
The photo is obviously fake Allan. And I read the entire book and had this same quibble with Bain’s goat section as I read it.
The goat story, unless its been proven by some source, was likely chosen at the school level. If not, the perps handed it to the school administration and asked them, perhaps insisted, that they use it in reading circle. All so they could have an inside joke/message. Perhaps, but I see that as unlikely. Bain might be exploiting a serendipitous teacher choice to further his demonic motif of that day. If so, Bain lucked out and said, “Oh my God, they even had a goat story. What great luck.”
Interesting that the best you could do in misdirection/water muddying is a claim about whose idea it was to read the goat story. But thanks for reminding me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZh8rckCTzc
Good catch re ‘Israel’! I hadn’t gone that deep….
The total and complete, naive trust, in the media, the town criers, the newspapers, evolving to the electronic mass media, and now the internet, is what holds up the world of delusions the masses live in. Like the power of the magician to amaze his audience, depends on their belief in the illusion. Show the trickery and he just becomes a fraud. Pull back the curtain and the wizard of Oz is just an odd little freak show.
I still think real planes has the ability to show the trickery and end the delusion. That is why they are intent on not allowing that to be discussed and revealed.
Do the psycho’s get endless amusement, duping delight, and reinforcement of their superiority complex? No doubt. They do seem to cling to this nonsense quite irrationally, and I think it just shows the emptiness, the sadism and lust for power, the irrational delusional insanity they dwell in, is even more absurd than the delusions they sell to the sheeple. Frighteningly , I believe they are quite insane.
end times prophecy……. I will send strong delusion that those that love not the truth, will believe a lie.
Well said Marsh!
Living in Europe, my interest and emotional involvement in all 9/11 details is somewhat limited. Knowing that neither cuts aluminium hardened steel, nor simple kerosene fires are able to melt it, nor do steel bars just collapse into dust is more than enough for me.
The facts that amaze me are the meticulous level of planning, and the (IMHO willful) gullibility of the populace. And looking at the last century, I’m more and more getting the impression ALL major events of this period are of the same kind.
This frightens me a bit, honestly.
So, the thing with no real planes, no real falling man is that They need the *belief* in the sacrifice rather than, or more than, a real sacrifice? (It’s also the case that They couldn’t *count on* someone jumping head-first like that, hence staging.)
My own notions of how the physical (ha ha) world really works make the belief of millions very powerful indeed. To what end, I wonder?
Allan, let’s pile on some more anomalies while we are at it – I noticed that the Esquire article you reference shows a total of 11 pictures of this dummy falling. 4 of the pictures do not even include a mix of lighted or shaded sides of the building. If an object falls vertically, the shadowy and sunlit sides of the building should be consistent throughout ALL the photos. I mean, the award winning photo has him right down the middle of the shaded side vs the sunlit side for Chris sake.
Yeah, i noticed that as well, but as I say in the last caption, the piling on gets tiresome. Good catch, still…
Excellent analysis, Allan. Too bad you didn’t have this picture to include with your Walter video as I wonder if it would have helped more.
Bush was reading “Pet Goat”…the story of a goat eating everything in the house wich pissed off her owner…but at the end she kick the ass of a bugglar so she deserve total forgiveness…a Goat eating every thing on her way…necessity create the organ…organ create the necessity
Oh, yeah, the ‘Pet Goat’ symbolism is a beaut. You could almost write a book on that aspect alone, what with Baphomet and so forth… It’s endless… Bain covers it pretty well (do a word search for ‘goat’ in the pdf.)
I noted the publisher of Bain, Levenda, Dyer etc. is Trine Day. The few books I have read from this publisher all seem similar in that they promise much, reveal little of fact and seem to be a bit flaky for want of a better word. Even the founder Millegan has a bio that reads like one of their titles. For reasons I cannot determine these books remind me of The Secret Life of Plants by Christopher Bird a generation ago (when his CIA past didn’t raise an alarm in more naive times). I still cannot fathom the why of these operations due to the incredible amount of work and money that seem to be involved. I have enjoyed your site as I more or less have followed a lot of the same personalities you have called out until something about them rang false.
Good catch. I hadn’t thought to look into the publisher (my bad). It’s likely that the company behind LHs is itself a higher level of such. Worth further research. Gracias!
I cannot say anything about Kris Milligan at Trine day except for the fact he published 2 great books in my opinion. “Dr. Marys monkey” and “Me and Lee”. I personally know the author of one of those books and trust her completely and have had communication with the other. These two books alone gives me a fair amount of trust in Kris Milligan, but who can say for sure. Any way those 2 books are off subject but are very compelling history most people don’t have a clue of. If anyone who is not familiar with them I highly recommend those 2 books. Ed haslam and Judyth Vary Baker have their own websites where one can get an idea of the subjects involved.
I read and liked Doc Mary’s Monkey, haven’t read Me and Lee. Remember, though, you gotta be careful, even with ‘good’ books, especially if they’re linked to people/organizations that are iffy at best.
There’s at least one interview with Bain and Milligan talking about the book. A big red flag re Milligan…