I think what I’ll do is paste in the first part of “Miles Mathis’s” recent essay on the Space Shuttle Program being fake and let you guys give it a look without any comments from me. See if you see what I see. No hints. Just read it and think about it. I’ll try to do my analysis tomorrow. If you want to use comments, great, and you might do what I will with my analysis: Add my observations in CAPS to his words.
You can find the essay at milesmathis.com.
Addendum: Most of you will recall my Open Letter to Miles Mathis from a while back, which lays out the evidence that MM is a psy op, probably out of Tavistock (based on the ‘Britisms’ I found).
The Space Shuttle Program was a Fake
by Miles Mathis
First published June 30, 2019
The Mandela Effect project is now really blowing up in their faces, since the last thing they wanted me (or anyone else) to do is look closely at the Space Shuttle program. But by including Moonraker in their list of Mandela Effects, they led me into this one themselves. In researching my recent paper on that, I had to go to Youtube and watch the official theatrical trailer from 1979. And of course that reminded me that this Bond film was made to sell the Space Shuttle program going online in those years. So one fraud keyed me into another.
Yep, he’s right. The shuttle engines don’t appear to be firing…
I have no intention of showing that Space Shuttles never existed, or only existed as holograms or something, from a parallel universe. That is not what I mean by fake. The planes certainly existed: I saw one being carted around on a 747 in Texas back in the 1980s. What I mean is that the planes were another massive fraud upon the taxpayers, doing nothing taxpayers wished to see done, little or nothing that needed to be done, and few or none of the things we are told they did. They were supposed to help launch various satellites, but we now launch satellites quite easily without them, and much more cheaply. Each shuttle launch cost almost $2 billion in today’s dollars, which is no bargain. Over $200 billion was spent on the program over three decades, and what do we have to show for it? Some museum pieces. A handful of chubby planes that never got out of LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and that haven’t morphed into more useful tech.
We now know that the Apollo program was an even more massive fraud, and that no one ever went to the Moon. That is what I would call common knowledge, although the governors wish it weren’t, and pretend it isn’t so. They are still trying to sell it, but have very few buyers outside of their government, university, and military hires. We also know the more recent SpaceX launches are fraudulent. They are so poorly faked even school children can see the seams. They have rockets flying backwards and landing on tiny spots in the ocean, while paid crowds of college students, meth heads, and gangbangers cheer and high-five.
Good point, Miles! The size of the tank does not match the other images!
Note: There is a lot more to it but let’s start with the above lead-in, which actually says everything ‘important.’ The rest of his essay is just more ‘evidence’ that the shuttle imagery is questionable. Not that he’s wrong; that’s not my point…
See how big the tank is in this one compared to the space shot image? Busted! So what’s my problem with MM?
Ok, some good comments here but let’s move on to the next post, if you have stuff to add…
my question would be so where did all the money go? or was it just to pay for *operation paperclip people and families to retire in tropical locations? or to fund the next wave of militarization of space ? ……………… someone spent a lot of money- aloha
Altough many people are discovering it, as time passes by, imho, the Mandela Effect phenomenon is over. You do get the proofs of it in very specific places, but its time is over.
From what I get, it was a moment in time where the Human Animal could question his memory lane.And that, concerning everything we believed. It was a one time occasion for everyone who wanted to ‘see’, to actually see it as it was, not as you’ve been told. People suddendly found themselves confronted with two memories (to start with). Intriguing…
+ the ‘effects’ somehow manage to hit people at the core of their believes (like the Bible).
The point beeing, where is it pointing to…? Probably not to Moonraker.
Followed your links to M2.Everyone boasting about his ranks in Internet world should have a lesson or two about humilty! Funny thing, if it wasn’t you Allan, I might never heard about this guy.
Hope you’re ok and that the road is sweet with both of you.
ps Gus is a ‘she’ ?
Not many people went the full road, trying to gather all changes mentioned as ‘ME affected’ or ‘Mandela’effects’
It seems started somewhere near 2009, picked in 2012, and the slowly phazed out and then all you had was ‘residue’.
ME was/is important but it has nothing to do with Nasa. It has something to do with a huge lie, but not with the ‘American space program’. Not in a direct way.
I also think that, people who tend to mix the hoaxes (like ‘Flat Earth”, tipycally an English spoken internet community phenomenon°, are just misleading people and introducing doubt and conflict amongst the community of truth seekers. Like russian matrioshkas, a psy-op within a psy-op,within a psy op… In a way, that puts them all in the same bag.
* sorry…
My message got out truncated. Don’t know what happened…
Some good points in your comment, pedro, altho I did not understand all of it. Don’t know why it got truncated…
I missed the ‘paid’ bystanders in my first few passes. Interesting.
“They have rockets flying backwards and landing on tiny spots in the ocean, while paid crowds of college students, meth heads, and gangbangers cheer and high-five.”
I’ve got one iffy bar where I am but will try to get my post out tomorrow. Good points you guys have made but the main one is….
Gimme until tomorrow, but do notice his comment about Spacex. ‘Even a child’ is referring to me, I suspect, since I’m the only non-flat earther who exposed the fraud (see my videos).
Okay, I’ll give you a hint about my point. One word. ‘Eyewitnesses.’
Miles is quite the master on halve truths and misdirection , here’s another subtle one but definite .
Miles claims big tragedies are used to hide news, have a hug fest and don’t hold any water but fails to mention their main and underlying purpose .
The ptb use them to emotionally charge the population to bring about an objective .
How was Miles able to see in Texas the shuttle “carted away” on a 747 when it was flown between Edwards Air Force Base in California and Kennedy space center in Florida?
Or was it flown so low that Texans could see it with naked eyes?
Is “carted away” meaning taken away by road or can it also mean by air and is it a word more used by the Brits?
I realized after posting this that indeed the 747 with the shuttle did land in various Texas Air Force bases in the 80’s on its way to the Kennedy Space Center. So yes, MM could have witnessed the landing or taking off if he was close enough to the AF base in question.
The satellite issue is a more important one as he seems to say they are real when it’s a fake program just like the fake Elon Musk’s Space X.
Since everything pretty much is a fake project even though they use real toys like the shuttle, I wonder about the big hype of the 5G as MM is adamant it’s for real!
Would the PTB use 5G to stir intense fear, and stress among the masses thereby insuring that more diseases would come out of it?
Funnily enough the only Mandela effect that really made me go “hang on a minute ” is the girl and Jaws one from Moonraker ……
Moonraker (1979) is a valid point. The cheesy flick with the unlikeable (or un-Sean-Connery) Roger Moore seemed to be leaning on the reality of the shuttle program, down-dating the 1955 novel with shameless topicality. Whereas the opposite now seems to be the case — the shuttle program leaned on the cheese.
Note also the name of the first shuttle mock-up (1976), and this photo – https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&id=4E50844E6400D5CF46168471ED2983DBAE00A0C2&thid=OIP.RIhVXm590QQGJCvSzMMRRQHaGc&mediaurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.geekwire.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F09%2F160907-star-trek-nasa-630×548.jpg&exph=548&expw=630&q=trek+cast+nasa&selectedindex=0&ajaxhist=0&vt=0&eim=1,6 – and the continuing importance of the shuttle to the Trek universe: a century and a half before Scott Bakula’s ship NX-01, there was a shuttle, see, which in ‘reality’ (but not, bafflingly, in the Trek universe) was named after the ship in a TV show set in the XXIII century …
Specifically the problems with what Mathis wrote (my commentary in CAPS.)
The Mandela Effect project is now really blowing up in their faces, since the last thing they wanted me (or anyone else) to do is look closely at the Space Shuttle program. But by including Moonraker in their list of Mandela Effects, they led me into this one themselves. MANDELA EFFECT HAS NO CONNECTION TO SPACE FRAUD. MATHIS WANTS US TO THINK MANDELA EFFECT IS IMPORTANT.
In researching my recent paper on that, I had to go to Youtube and watch the official theatrical trailer from 1979. And of course that reminded me that this Bond film was made to sell the Space Shuttle program going online in those years. So one fraud keyed me into another.
Yep, he’s right. The shuttle engines don’t appear to be firing…
I have no intention of showing that Space Shuttles never existed, or only existed as holograms or something, from a parallel universe. NO ONE SERIOUS CLAIMS THAT THE SHUTTLE DOESN’T EXIST.
That is not what I mean by fake. The planes certainly existed: I saw one being carted around on a 747 in Texas back in the 1980s. What I mean is that the planes were another massive fraud upon the taxpayers, doing nothing taxpayers wished to see done, little or nothing that needed to be done, and few or none of the things we are told they did. They were supposed to help launch various satellites, but we now launch satellites quite easily without them, and much more cheaply.
The Mandela Effect project is now really blowing up in their faces, since the last thing they wanted me (or anyone else) to do is look closely at the Space Shuttle program. But by including Moonraker in their list of Mandela Effects, they led me into this one themselves. In researching my recent paper on that, I had to go to Youtube and watch the official theatrical trailer from 1979. And of course that reminded me that this Bond film was made to sell the Space Shuttle program going online in those years. So one fraud keyed me into another.
Yep, he’s right. The shuttle engines don’t appear to be firing…
I have no intention of showing that Space Shuttles never existed, or only existed as holograms or something, from a parallel universe. That is not what I mean by fake. The planes certainly existed: I saw one being carted around on a 747 in Texas back in the 1980s. What I mean is that the planes were another massive fraud upon the taxpayers, doing nothing taxpayers wished to see done, little or nothing that needed to be done, and few or none of the things we are told they did. They were supposed to help launch various satellites, but we now launch satellites quite easily without them, and much more cheaply.
MATHIS IS NOT EXAMINING THE QUESTION THAT SATELLITES THEMSELVES ARE FAKE. THE WHOLE PROGRAM IS A “SIMULATION.”
Each shuttle launch cost almost $2 billion in today’s dollars, which is no bargain. Over $200 billion was spent on the program over three decades, and what do we have to show for it? Some museum pieces. A handful of chubby planes that never got out of LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and that haven’t morphed into more useful tech.
We now know that the Apollo program was an even more massive fraud, and that no one ever went to the Moon. That is what I would call common knowledge, although the governors wish it weren’t, and pretend it isn’t so. They are still trying to sell it, but have very few buyers outside of their government, university, and military hires. We also know the more recent SpaceX launches are fraudulent. They are so poorly faked even school children can see the seams. They have rockets flying backwards and landing on tiny spots in the ocean, while paid crowds of college students, meth heads, and gangbangers cheer and high-five.
Good point, Miles! The size of the tank does not match the other images!
Note: There is a lot more to it but let’s start with the above lead-in, which actually says everything ‘important.’ The rest of his essay is just more ‘evidence’ that the shuttle imagery is questionable. Not that he’s wrong; that’s not my point…
See how big the tank is in this one compared to the space shot image? Busted! So what’s my problem with MM?
WELL THE MAIN PROBLEM IS HE DOWNPLAYS THE SCALE OF THE FRAUD AS WELL AS INTRODUCING IRRELEVANT SIDE ISSUES. HE IS ALSO NOT TELLING US ANYTHING NEW HERE.
I’ll try to get my post out later today — it’s not going to be that long. As I say, my real problem with the ‘MM’ essay can be summed up by the word ‘eyewitnesses.’
Anyone get my pernt?
Mathis first starts off with a title saying The Space Shuttle program was a fake.
Then in paragraph 2, he starts off with “I have no intention of showing that Space Shuttles never existed, or only existed as holograms or something, from a parallel universe. That is not what I mean by fake. The planes certainly existed:…”
Seems contradictory to me. And at the same time, throwing in the ME Effect being fraudulent, thereby black-washing ME with the Shuttle Program.
PS, when I look closely at the shuttle engines, IMO, they do seem to be firing with what looks like a transparent light blue flame coming out their nozzle.
You’re close, yes…. and the paragraph you quote is important re MM’s misdirection.
Well, maybe it is what we do not see in his papers, analysis of the Apollo program. The propaganda is off the charts these days, and he revisits the Space Shuttle just in time, but coming from the Mandela effect. When talking about the Space Shuttle, Hubble should not be missing. Basing the “research” mainly on the Wikipedia, is just mocking of everyone not trusting the narrative. Anyway, there is surely more beef than the photos analyzed here, and staring at Apollos pictures is always portrayed as method of proving the Apollo hoax, when the big picture is much more revealing. Just take Apollo 8, no unmanned test before, and NASA can not do that reentry from travel speed today.
I read much of Miles, but quickly concentrated on the methods of hoaxing, discarding science and genealogy quick. The charge field is New Age, yes he pushes New Age too. The Pi=4 thing maybe is a funny adaption of Zeno’s paradoxes. He himself, the painting cat loving part time physicist, is scripted as the Übermensch from Nietzsche. Well done!