While (hopefully) we are all mulling over Friedkin/Letts’s Bug — and I am especially struggling with all the implications thereof — I thought I’d alert you to James Corbett’s extraordinarily well-wrought two-hour documentary on Bill Gates, which I have just finished. (It’s four parts total about two hours.)
You have to give Corbett credit for such deep research. I mean, were I to take on such a task, with one assistant, (in Corbett’s case, editor Broc West) this would have been at least a six month project, leaving no between-time to do anything else, like say, a daily posting of interviews/opinion podcasts/essays/etc, as Corbett does. After all, my 90 minute solo effort, Water Time took… well, years in the making. I guess that compared to Corbett I’m just…really slow witted.
Either that or — as with ‘Miles Mathis,’ another source of incredibly diverse and deep ‘truth-telling’ — Corbett gives the game away via his sheer volume of covert exposition. Make no mistake: Corbett’s many documentaries are chock-full of important information and are of high value to anyone with an interest in HTWRW…
But given the impossible output, plus the many important subjects he somehow avoids, plus, of course, the early 9/11 give-away (that he is a PTB asset) I exposed in 2015, presumably before Corbett learned to better disguise his ‘NLP’ (by my definition, but see this deeper analysis)… we have to ask ourselves what is the PTB-purpose behind all the bean spillage? What’s in it for them that we know so many nasty secrets behind Bill Gates? And, come to think, what do they get out of a movie like Bug?
One of the reasons I’m taking so long with the movie analysis is that it covers this very subject, i.e., how genuine and incriminating revelations (also like those found in Corbett’s work) could possibly benefit those who seek to do us (the human race) harm. The answer(s) goes beyond simple limited hangout — planting the misapprehension that the worst, the most revealing, of the truth has now been outed and there is no more to be seen here, folks. The devil is in the details kind of thing. And in the layers.
Yeah, information/storytelling like Corbett’s and Bug go way beyond that.
So please do take in the Corbett Gates exposé, as it is especially relevant in this age of engineered pandemics, the amped-up EM zapping of our biological essences, and the coming of forced vaccinations, but also keep in mind that as with the nearly ancient movie I have recommended (and asked for your views on), the real horrors lay several tiers down from the obvious, and from the information presented.
If you want to go deeply into Bug, think about Friedkin’s most similar effort… what did this one mean? What was it trying to tell us?
Speaking of Bug, I’m pleased to see that at least some of you are participating in my analytical challenge; I have been both surprised and unsurprised by the responses so far. Deeply so.
Aside from maybe learning something from you, a reason I’m asking (or insisting) that you view and respond to the movie is so my story analysis does not become tedious. If you’ve seen the film and been ‘forced’ to think about it, the details I go into may strike you as genuinely revelatory, as opposed to oh-hum nit-picky. Plus, if any of you are interested in the craft of storytelling, you may learn something. We’ll see.
The worst that can happen is you’ll have something to yell at me about.
Allan
Although I’ll be paying attention to the comments in all recent posts, put your analysis in the latest post (for now, this one). You still have a couple days before I get this right. I’m still scouring the Internet for someone, anyone, who understands what the story is yelling in our faces. And that includes the storytellers themselves. Where they are coming from in terms of intent is one of the layers that needs to be understood.
Addendum (a few hours later): The deeper I dive into Bug, the more I dissect its layers, the stranger and… more frightening it becomes. I think this will end up the weirdest post I’ll have ever done. I’m serious.
Is it ok if I post this here?
I wanted to post the write but it’s too long.
I think this relates to Bug in some ways.
If not, please delete it.
Not trying to promote myself. Just trying to share
something that came to me yrs ago in a dream or something
when my eyes first came open. thank you
https://bluevineyard.blogspot.com/2017/08/dont-let-them-take-you-to-room-101.html
I’m holding off on replying to comments so as not to spoil my points in the post. I appreciate your replies!
The time period 2006 when Bug came out would be around the time when Morgellons Disease was showing up in the U.S. population. One research paper noted 2002 as the first reported US case.
The idea of insects crawling under the skin & ‘cutting out egg sacks’ brings this to mind.
During this time, the first response on ‘mainstream’ was for the psychological factory to label Morgellons as a ‘delusion of parisitosis’ to cover up the disease itself. Talk about ‘layers’.
Bug
I think I heard Peter say, while he was in
the military, they put a chip in his head
and some other guy. He took his out
after escaping from the military. If so,
that says a lot about the whole story.
How the hell did he get the chip out?
Of course, in the story he’s
either a wacko and/or being used in an evil
experiment along with Agnes.
It feels like Bug is also a
reflection that we’re all just bugs or what
else are we? Will humans be dehumanized
and treated with insecticide too, to control, whatever…
Are we being mated with the Praying Mantis aliens?
Is this just a conscience life of discontent?
Is there an eventual takeover to turn us into
bigger bugs, smaller bugs or is Bug pointing out
that we’re being ‘bugged’ inside and out.
An answer comes with the psycho babble
of confusion into insanity hell at the end.
It’s refreshing to know, that even
after you go crazy, you have enough
guts to kill yourself to save the rest
of us. Maybe. Anything’s possible.
The ‘evil’ aliens run the PTB that bugs us all.
Here’s hoping there’s good aliens.
I agree, the Corbett documentary on Gates is terrific. As in terrifying. The biometrics and “digital ID” stuff is pure dystopia. Gates and his “like-minded colleagues” are evil control freaks. Thanks for recommending this documentary. I learned a lot from it. And yes, we still need to regard Corbett with some suspicion.
Agnes White and Peter Evans didn’t meet by chance. Her girlfriend (R.C.) and Ex (Jerry Goss) were both associated with children and appear they were used to get something in return for their help in the meetup. R.C was able to get custody of a child right after their meetup and the EX may have gotten early prison release and was also present during Dr. Sweet’s intervention attempt.
The abduction of Agnes’ son Loyd is important and exposes the deeper agenda behind missing children worldwide due to government operatives and such. Was the son taken and used for his DNA/genes/etc.. most likely.
Peter was allowed to ‘escape’. He most likely was injected with something nefarious that may have included a boutique solution including something genetic from Agnes’ son that would later be used against him when they had sex.
Their sex seemed to have created a new agent/virus/molecule/bacteria within Peter as he was clearly behaving differently post sex. The additional trigger seems to have been the silent buzzing phone call Peter picked up anticipating it was her EX, which up to that point had no effect Agnes prior to their sex (5G immediately comes to mind and/or all other electronic devices for communications and what not). You can see his immediate twitch in his ear after the call. Shortly thereafter, his paranoid behavior went berserk-like.
During Dr. Sweet’s visit, the Dr. had no issues of being scared of becoming infected and even takes a hit off of Agnes’ pot pipe. This experiment also was to see how beliefs could manifest themselves to others, which is what I think happened to Agnes b/c Doc Sweet mentioned to her that if Peter were to leave, the bugs would leave to. So the bugs don’t appear to be physically real but in Peter’s they were.
During the entire presence of Peter, he does drop a number of truths in there. Were they all truths? Some certainly were. But some of the new ones to me was the Coke plants in Latin America could have been infested by the CIA… Children may have received sub-dermal implants since 1982, Jim Jones trying to call out experiments, etc.. So gotta check on these as they could be distractions too, making people digging into this look bad.
The names of key players could be important.. Agnes White. Last name of White seems to align with Cocaine. Was this cocaine tainted? Maybe. But R.C. didn’t seem to be affected.
Dr. Sweet… Last name seems to be a play on drugs.
So, lots of stuff here. Looking forward to your review. My main point here is the use of a boutique agent/trigger for it’s specificity to alter Peter at some designated moment at the controllers CONTROL.
Correction:
So the bugs don’t appear to be physically real but in Peter’s they were.
Should have stated:
So the bugs don’t appear to be physically real but in Peter’s MIND they were.
(Moved this comment from the last post to this one)
There seemed to me to be two conclusions you could make from Bug depending on your worldview.
For the blue-pilled: Be afraid of people who bring you alternative news. They are likely mentally unstable and, if you’re not careful, could drag you into whatever paranoid state they are in. They could be friendly. They could be ex-military. Still, don’t trust them. Run them out of your life.
For the red-pilled: You may think you have an unknown truth about HTWRW, but you should doubt your own sanity if you’re thinking such things. Even if you’re right, they know you know and won’t let you get to the point where you could do something about it. Best to just ignore it.
On one level, Peter Evans is the personification of the world wide web itself?
Originating from a military research facility, your friend introduces you, soon you welcome into your own home, somewhat benign until you get intimate…
Keep thinking about this film. For me, it’s an allegory for society – particularly one in which the Internet is so influential; the facilitator for one person’s psychosis to be passed on to another like a disease. That’s my take, maybe I’m not looking deep enough. Really looking forward to your critique Allan.
RE: Bug…Nothing is as it appears…Peter’s rant about “the way things are” starting at 1:14:15 sums it all up (most of it anyway.) Reminds us about a Moody Blues tale – “Face piles of trials with smiles. It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave and keep on thinking free.”
“And now, to suit our great computer, your magnetic ink!”
Holed up in Maine waiting for the Phenomenon.
Pura Vida
Bug – Agnes is only safe with her female friend RC who is a lesbian. Agnes is only ever seen in a non threatening place when in the lesbian bar. All the men are a danger or perceived as a threat to her including the man in the shop who reaches over her. When men and women have a relationship it makes bad things, in this case the bugs.
Also, from my perspective in England, America is a scary place especially out in the middle of nowhere. I’ve never been to America but those wide open places, with motels and people who seem desperate who live in them need to be given a wide berth.
Parts of the film remind me of Apocalypse Now, the rotating fan and the confines of the stuffy motel room. Like when In Apocalpsye Now he is drunk in his room at the start, punching the mirror and the helicopter comes with the military men and they put him in the shower. Then he goes on a dark journey down the river. It’s like what happens to Agnes, she then goes on a dark journey, after the fan rotating scene.
Also, the tooth pulling reminds me of 1984. O’Brien says, “You did it to yourself”. In Bug, Evans does do it to himself.
I couldn’t hear all the dialogue. I shall have to go back and revisit parts, especially the flyer on her car. I didn’t catch what it said. The onion probably has some significance, as well as the number 7 on the door. The shopping trolley is like a cage, but the child got out of it.
The repetition of some of the shots are probably meaningful too. I think we see the number 7 twice, Dr Sweet dead twice and the child’s toys twice.
In counting the glimpse of the child’s toys, did you include the shot of these that for some reason was inserted into the end credits?
Hello, yes, I did. it is now making me wonder if there are multiple timelines in the film. Dr Sweet is dead at the start, dead at the end but not in the burnt house and in between alive.
The toys are also making me wonder… When Peter is looking through the microscope the toys are out. Jerry comes in and says something along the lines of how Agnes will be upset and he best put them away before Agnes gets back. I think there is no break in the scene but Agnes does come back with RC and the toys appear to be away. Maybe its a blooper, maybe it’s insignificant. Maybe it’s a multiple timeline. Maybe the child is still alive and at home in another timeline.
The helicopter shot over the area appears a few times too. Perhaps some demarcation of timelines.
I’m just doing this off the top of my head now.
Leading British Mathematician: https://youtu.be/naj3MeL9YKw
It does not matter anymore since the unreversable damage to the world’s economy and the consequences will be devistating starting with world wide famine and massive social unrest . When people lose everything they have nothing to lose.
Or as Trends Research analyst, Gerald Celente, puts it:
“When people have nothing left to lose…they *lose* it.”
ScuzzsMan states the deep truth that I attempted to nail in my The Truman Prophecy (http://bit.ly/2rdIJ9Q_Truman_Prophecy_Print)… and am now trying to launch via The FLOW Fellowship (http://bit.ly/337e3dv_FLOW_Update8_NewVid_BioInfo). [But every cause took a big pause from the necessity of crushing this Covid Op.]
Thanks, Allan for pointing out the possible fly in the Corbett ointment. Perhaps he has a much larger staff than we’re aware of, whose background may be PTB-suspect. I’ve watched the first episode of his Gates expose, which is outstanding, so at this point I’m not inclined to look a gift horse in the mouth.
Maybe we should focus more on the quality of the pudding than how it got to us, as we join hands to rid the planet of the Men of the Power Sickness. I feel similarly about the HighWire news from Del Bigtree.
Haven’t watched it, but will do asap. Only just got the email linking here a minute ago. But I wanted to propose a **partial** explanation for the “Why?” of all the revelations.
In my experience, nobody, from the bloodiest Khans and Caesars to the mildest repressed librarian, wants to be the “Secret King” of the world, or even of the Self Help section. Sooner or later the most cunning Machiavellian schemer, the most secretive plotting Little-finger, the goriest shogun to the nominal Emperor, wants to openly sit on the iron throne, to receive the awe, the adulation, and the fear of his inferiors. To not only wield the power but to be **Seen** to wield the power. Sooner or later he wants what he sees as his just desserts. He wants what is rightfully (in his own mind) already his. He wants it openly seen and openly and universally acknowledged.
This is an inherent part of a broken human psychology, the “will to power”, the elevation of my wants above the needs and lives of others. In a life driven not by want but by this elevation of wants, the unfulfilled want, the want of open submission to my will, becomes the over-riding want. Becomes THE driving force of all thought and action. Everything is put in service to the fulfillment of this end, that all the world should see me for what I am: the greatest, the most glorious, the most powerful, the most feared.
I’ll be back (to comment on the film).
“They want you to know they’re there.” — [Michael Shannon as] Peter Evans, ‘Bug’ (2006)
Yes, I agree. They want the attention and the credit for what they’re doing, otherwise there is no sick reward for them. It’s too easy. It’s like winning a game of chess against an opponent who is blind and doesn’t know how to play (which describes most of the population). They need the recognition even if they have to provide it themselves by hiring paid opposition in the truth movement and even if they just need to push our faces in it under the guise of “drama/fiction” through Hollywood movies. If there is no resistance, their power almost doesn’t exist. There is no bad unless there is good. There is no dark unless there is light. As ‘ScuzzaMan’ says in his comment: ‘To not only wield the power but to be **Seen** to wield the power.’ Yes – I agree. That is what they not only yearn for – but, in fact, it is what they need in order to exist.
*Addendum: So maybe their greatest and only fear is that they will no longer get any attention. Once the handful of people who actually know or mostly know how the world really works dies off this planet (either naturally or by targeted and general culling) – there will be no resistance at all and their power will, in effect, no longer exist. If no one acknowledges your power, do you really have any? No, I would say, no you don’t. Or not any of the Machieavellian kid of power that they thirst for. Possible solution to the PTB takeover of the planet? – IGNORE THEM. Continue skipping and loving and playing and laughing no matter what evil and fear they place in your path. Ignore it and keep going, even if it does mean death. I would rather die by my own sword (on my own terms) with my own freedom and mind intact than die by the sword of a tyrant. And I would NEVER bow to a tyrant and kiss his hand for mercy. Give me liberty or give me death. Simple. Fuck ’em. Ignore their asses and they will wither and die. That is THEIR GREATEST FEAR. Right now most of the population is so blind and controlled they have to manufacture and pay for their own exposition of truth. Pathetic. Desperate. And they know it.
Rebecca you are absolutely on the nail Correct!, and I have never thought that much (well near nothing at all) about that true aspect you point out – if your power isn’t NOTICED, you pretty much have NONE (for humans that is anyway).
A few more things I noticed in ‘Bug’ –
1. You can bath in petrol, and no it won’t even sting your EYES or skin at all,
– until you strike a match.
2. You can perfectly line the walls of a motel room with aluminium foil in no time, like overnight, and it wards off electromagnetic waves.
3. Tell a lie big & convincing enough, and most people will believe it “Aphids suck blood, what do you know about aphids? bla bla” – no they don’t.
4. The technology they were up against seemed to be decades ahead of their time.
I am looking forward to Allan’s findings.