I’m doing this post just to make sure we’re all on the same page — even if you disagree with me, we ought to make sure you’re disagreeing with what I actually am saying. Right? Right.
Happened upon a folk festival the other day…
As I’ve said, the ‘star visibility’ issue — best summed up in this video and this one — is of high enough importance that a little redundancy is called for (or a lot). I’ve also said that there are two — and only two – possible reasons for the lack of stars in the space imagery we get from the various PTB sources. Either they (the images) are all fraudulent or space is not what we’ve been told. That the official imagery is all fraudulent is becoming more and more apparent. This, however, does not infer anything regarding the ‘nature of space’ issue, since in any case — ‘space is real’ or ‘space is something else’ — the imagery would be faked, for one of two reasons, i.e., cost (faking is cheaper than doing) or because chemical rocketry doesn’t work (for whatever reason). So these two subjects should be kept separate in our thinking.
A related matter is my hypothesis that — given the fraudulent imagery — either man has never left the earth (accomplished low earth orbit or better) in any craft, or man has been zipping around the solar system with anti-grav craft for many decades, resulting in what Richard Dolan has termed a ‘breakaway civilization.’ Either one of these scenarios would result in the necessity to fake imagery obtained from (fake) chemical rocket ‘missions’ — again, it’s possible that man cannot leave the earth, for technical (or who knows, maybe spiritual) reasons; . (Yes, I am repeating myself up the yin yang but, based on some of the comments, a few out there are not understanding the issues at hand; a little word-play might help.)
That’s my campsite in the distance.
Logically speaking, the use of fake space imagery is unrelated to the question of a breakaway civilization’s theoretical freedom to soar about the solar system (and maybe the stars). I’m hoping you all understand the logic here. These are related but not ‘dependent’ issues.
Just as important is the Alt Media’s total failure to deal with these issues, a situation that implies their collusion in the deceit, with ‘Forum Borealis’ being the latest example, given the rambling and ridiculous misdirection rampant in his attempt to avoid the above questions. Given that the whole Secret Space Program crew — see this post for most of their names, plus this one for some rowdiness — have done exactly the same thing tells us that Operation Mockingbird has been busy co-opting the Net from its very get-go, and I mean from one end of the ‘truther spectrum’ to the other, say, Democracy Now (obviously dirty) to ‘Miles Mathis,’ (the most outrageous) and all betwixt. (One signal that this is the case is the fact that no one — not one truther out of the whole mess — has dealt with this subject: ‘To what depth has Operation Mockingbird infiltrated the alt media?’ See, the question is not whether they
Where I am now.
have infiltrated, it’s only a matter of degree.
Addendum: As you all should know, Mockingbird was/is one of CIA’s most longstanding and wildly successful ops. Going back to the 1950s and run by the Agency’s higher-up sociopaths like Dulles, Frank Wisner, and Cord Meyer, even limited hangout artists like Carl Bernstein had to admit its sleazy efficacy at controlling the media. A question: Does anyone think that Mockingbird was/is limited to the mainstream media? In fact, I would bet that, at least since 9/11/01, more energy and manpower has been aimed at alt media than anywhere else. Evidence of this is the fact that you’re probably hearing this idea for first time here.
As far as I am aware, it’s only little old me who has raised these vital issues. And, frankly speaking, I don’t believe I have come across even one alt media name who has dealt with my queries differently than Forum Borealis, i.e., by actually answering questions rather than misdirection. (I’ve left a few ‘researchers’ alone, usually for personal reasons.) Anyone wanting to do a study on this need only scan my past posts. One way is to search for a name in my posts, via “Name” site:https://blog.banditobooks.com.
Love those starry skies, clear air.
They all use the same tactic, which I refer to as ‘NLP via misdirection’; most (including Borealis) get around to accusing me of being dirty, notwithstanding that this accusation makes no sense. (I mean given that the last thing the PTB want is a discussion on the degree to which they have infiltrated the alt media (let alone the Spacex fraud, of which, again, I seem to be the only whistle blower).
#
I went back and looked at a couple of my old posts on this matter, which are linked above. They are perhaps too wordy, and for those who have really been paying attention, there’s probably no need to re-visit them. But those who are new to this blog, or, especially, those who don’t seem to understand what I’m saying… maybe go ahead and take the time. Again, this one and this one.
To those of you who are tired of this space stuff (you really shouldn’t be, given the implications): My next post will take us back to humankind’s origins.
Allan
please delete last two posts here is Frank Zapata landing sorry did realize this technology existed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx76Tdkq5J4
I wonder why on earth he had to land on that tall table thing???
Here’s one of this Franky Zapata guy with his hoverboard aka flyboard video partly shows the landing. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2016/4/confirmed-franky-zapata-sets-new-farthest-hoverboard-flight-record-in-france-427011 the direct on youtube though better in above less ads. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=125&v=kwXWTsQh3F8
Hi Alan wondered if you’ve seen this and noticed they don’t show the landing and looked on several sites. Not questioning your take on the rocket and spacex being a fraud thogh thought this is amazing if it’s real:) ” Just 10 days after a failed first try ended with Franky Zapata up to his neck in water, the French jet-ski champion successfully crossed the English Channel on his self-made “flyboard” Sunday morning.
Taking off at 8:17 a.m. local time, he flew across the 21.7 miles that separate the French town of Sangatte from Saint Margaret’s at Cliffe on the southeast British coast. The trip took a total of 22 minutes — with one refueling stop in the middle. ” https://abcnews.go.com/International/french-bird-man-franky-zapata-successfully-crosses-english/story?id=64763747
Thanks for the links; very interesting stuff. Thing is, relating it to the Musk fraud, it’s apples and oranges. See, Frank has complete control over his ‘attitude’ by flexing at the ankles, knees, waist, etc., which, in conjunction with thrust control, is completely different from the booster landings — I assume your point is comparing the two.
Does anyone need further explanation to realize that this guy’s flights — if anything — only go to prove my point that you can’t control attitude and guidance (across the ground) at the same time with only thrust at the bottom, even if it’s adjustable? Again: He has control over his tilt via his flexible body. The Musk boosters do not have that.
I gotta give the guy credit, for his balls and his skill. (Btw, ask him to balance a broom and bring it down to a spot on the ground: he won’t be able to do it!)
Thanks for replying. Just never seen anything like that and was skeptical when they didn’t show clear shot of him landing in 1st few videos i saw. Love your films posts and shared with many online and in person. Been busy caring for my senior Shepherd both dealing with hip issues. Look forward to seeing what friends at a club say as know they saved via cell many really liked the time release shorts and said thy would watch Water Time just haven;t been there in a few months. So much news and info in Epstein saga that has worldwide implications also.
what about the water version also called fly board and also supposedly invented by that Zapata guy? Before that there was Jetlev flyer. Tourists can buy a water fly board course on many holiday places. This is supposedly working, no? Although I don’t believe you can create the necessary power using small jet engines. Other than that, having a good sense of balance, one should be able to stay stable on such thing, don’t you think? I can’t even stay on my kid’s wave boards but it’s very easy for them.
Off topic comment. Has anyone here ever tried to explain Miles Mathis if it is indeed fraudulent and or a limited hangout? The art on his page is all absolutely genuine and backed up by photographs of the same subjects in the artwork. It is puzzling. My best explanation is that there really was an artist named Miles Mathis who died some time in the early 2000’s but their artwork and general persona was kept alive by an imposter who acts as M2 today. Then this imposter’s blog is basically a free posting board for articles to post as limited hangouts by intelligence.
Anyone have their own theory? Something that explains the art. I have really studied that art and it really seems genuine even though it seems to have died out somewhere around 2000.
Jethro, we are in the immanence of the eschaton, i.e. the time of the apocalypse – just before the end of this cycle (yin or yang). The apocalypse is when this impending doom is gradually revealed to those among the populace able to countenance it, but not in blatant or clear terms. The capable individual’s first step is to understand that all is not as it seems (deception), hence recent, minor deceptions that are deliberately imperfect/inept enough that the perspicacious will begin to notice them (especially when pointed out). The second step is to understand the reasons for the major deceptions that have occurred in the last century or so (to escape Samsara). The third step is revealed by that understanding.
Miles Mathis is one of many forms in which revelations are provided – even if occluded by junk. Only the percipient will be able sort the wheat from the chaff – just as they so sort themselves.
Keep in mind that the photographs on his website are just that: Photographs. I don’t get why they are meaningful in any way. MM might be a real guy and he might not be. What do photos have to do with it?
Yep, he’s a LH all right, but I don’t think it’s that casual. It’s highly organized, the material posted etc.
That’s just the thing that is so interesting about Miles Mathis to me though, is the level “they” have gone to make it appear very genuine. It is extremely dangerous logic to demur that a thing is fake because it could be fake. I have studied the images/ photographs of Miles Mathis artwork and it is very much real. The artworks are dated from the late 80s to early 90s and show a clear progression down to the artist signature. Fascinating. I wonder if intelligence has a whole collection of such personalities that they can use at will as it suits them that match up to real people that have existed. All you would need would be a person who vaguely resembles the original in the case of Miles Mathis to put up on the website to show that the person has aged and then you could publish whatever you wanted on the website under this person’s name. The backstory being somewhat real only adds to the illusion.
It has become one of the most useful skills one can have in this day and age to be able to distinguish between real imagery and manufactured imagery. In a case such as SpaceX, just because something like holograph technology exists does not mean that they are not actually launching a rocket from the launch pad…not to say such a rocket is actually reaching space. Whether or not what you would see with your eyes in Florida would match the imagery for public release is a completely different story as well. But I do say that it is very dangerous to dismiss something as fake simply because it could be faked. I find a whole collection of implications from the idea that Miles Mathis artwork is real. We live in a day and age where anything could be faked, so this is why Miles Mathis artwork is so interesting to me. I am quite certain it is genuine.
One other thing I wanted to make sure to mention is that the recent images of Mathis himself appear to me to be a different person than the older pictures. It’s subtle, but it’s there. The other detail that really stood out was his wearing of a cross necklace in early photographs. Given the backstory they tell us about Mathis, I cannot imagine a time in his life when he ever would have been caught dead wearing a cross necklace.
There is truth to be found in lies.
Jethro, the cross is a big clue. Just as I use ‘X’. Here’s a very brief intro to the cross:
http://humansarefree.com/2014/11/astro-theology-and-great-cycles-of-time.html
Boy oh boy is it fun to put the Mathis photographs through forensic photo software. All the photos that include Mathis at any age are PACKED with anomalies. The art photos are mostly clean, as I indicated. But WOW are there a ton of anomalies in any photo of Mathis on the site. The one of him drinking coffee in Europe in particular is an obvious paste job. I wish I could post photos on here.
MM introduced me to the concept of a commission, like he sees the authorship of Harry Potter. Mathematics could be the same, maybe it’s intelligence guys throwing their talents into a hat. This way, they created a “Übermensch”. And they laugh hard, whenever he is quoted.
Allan,
Keep up the great work.
Your true audience may be small but you do us no small service in sharing your ideas on HTWRW by opening our eyes and minds to questions of huge importance re our true place in this puzzle in the darkness.
Many thanks my friend
Ditto Eric, couldn’t have said it better myself! Thanks again Allan.
Thanks Brett, Eric. Appreciate it. I’m going back over ‘My List So Far’ to find something other than the space issue; see how other things have changed since I wrote that post.
If you had a captcha box for posting, I think some of the automated drivel might go away. I’m afraid you’re going to have problems in the future otherwise because of robo-posting bots.
I finally get it … everything and everyone is fake … it’s definitely the conclusion I’ve come to, where haven’t we been lied to, from space lies to medical lies to history is a lie agreed upon … we don’t even recognize truth anymore, all we do is point out the lie that most offends us at the moment, and there is certainly no shortage of those. Every day we drown in a sea of lies, big lies, little lies, the lie de jour …. I guess if you still have some humanity left you at least try to scrape away some of the dirt that has been heaped upon us … I, for one, am growing weary, very, very weary … the windmills are winning. It seems to me, the lies and the liars out number us, or at least have total control over whatever light we might have to share. So … let the finger pointing continue.
Pretty much how I feel. It would be nice if I could point out some direct truths (which I’ve done via, say, Electric Universe) rather than parsing one lie after another, but if we know what is NOT true we’re halfway there. Remember, ‘When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truth.’ (I have the complete works of A. Conan Doyle on audio book – spoken by Stephen Fry, who is great – and find them very calming and entertaining.)
After watching your youtube videos on the astronauts, especially the old black and white versions, I am struck by how demoralized they look. Like they signed up for this great adventure and now they are soul sick having to sell lies for a living. I mean can you imagine how excited they’d be if they really went to space? They be freaking jacked with joy! Over the moon with excitement. And yet they look like they are selling term life insurance instead. No joy that’s for sure.
Yep, but fanboys and shills have an answer for that (I forget what it is), and an answer for every other piece of QED evidence. It’s a religion.
The fanboys say, that they had to suffer it out in crammed quarters, eating the same lousy food, and they always add – they had to poo into a bag haha!, and that they had to stay in quarantine for a while here on earth LOL!………
It’s a religion indeed Allan!
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/maysuryan/46825033/1900538/1900538_800.jpg
Watched another beautiful Space X launch last night from the Space Coast. How do you explain the rumble we all can see and feel 30 miles from the launch pad if it’s not an intense chemical reaction?
Come down and see it for yourself. With a press pass you can get up on the VAB and feel the heat.
Look into the technology DARPA and related agencies have come up with (just what we know about) and you should find that ‘a rumbling’ is not much of a challenge to reproduce. Sorry, but I don’t know how anyone could bring this up as proof of anything, given that the laws of physics are broken all over the place, especially the boosters backing down. I mean, have you bothered to view any of my videos on Spacex? If not, please don’t leave comments. (Really, is this too much to ask?)
Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZDF23wcMVo
And this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGWWe0a8zuI
Do you really think a half million pounds of high grade metal can be VAPORIZED by a 6 second kerosene explosion? Look into the vaporization temperatures of the alloys used. What they are showing you is impossible. Now see the S. Holmes quote above. Get it? ‘however impobable’…
Yes. I’ve seen the videos. But you haven’t bothered to come down here and watch the rocket contrails being affected by upper atmospheric winds. Something is going boom and ascending way up in the sky. And yes, landing sometimes successfully on a floating pad then being drug by barge back into the Canaveral port. Come take your own videos and pictures to analyze.
You’ve seen the videos… and have nothing to say about them? Do you understand physics, vaporizing temps, and so forth? Not even counting the impossibility of backing down a rocket from space and hitting a manhole cover target in mid ocean. Are you serious?
I haven’t BOTHERED to come and watch what? I don’t doubt what you’ve seen any more than I doubt that David Copperfield ‘made the Statue of Liberty disappear.’ So I’m going to drive a thousand miles to film what I suspect is a DARPA/NASA/PTB illusion — an illusion based on the fact that aluminum alloys vaporize at 18,000 degrees F and kerosene fuel burns at less than 2,000.
You’ve ‘seen the videos.’ You’re too lazy to respond to the videos yet I’m supposed to spend a week driving? Are you getting my point?
After seeing their exploding rocket vaporize into thin air (a first in history)….I wouldn’t be surprised if they are using a PA system for the sound!!
isnt pad 39A three and a half miles from the VAB ? That heat is HAARP, not SpaceX, son.
I enjoy your pictures of the road.
I agree. As an experienced author, Allan’s very good with a keyboard but he’s even better with a camera. His stills are excellent and his moving pictures and time lapses are worth 1,000 words per frame. He’s a keen observer from a unique vantage point and a story teller extraordinaire.
Thanks. I suspect as I deteriorate in the coming years, it will be my photographs and time l lapses that are the last to go.
Allan,
While you’re in the area, keep a watch out for Forrest Fenn’s treasure.
https://youtu.be/aJBakBqwQVs
There’s some nice video (and time lapses) in this (2:38) NM True youtube promo.
I agree!! 🙂
That’s nice. What are you holding back? Wait. Never mind. If you can’t be specific I probably don’t want to hear it.
As Allan well knows there was one alt media voice in agreement with him. DaveMcGowan. And his rapid and strange death quieted him, except his work is still available . I can think of one possibility for no one in the alt media agreeing with Allan. Even if they agree they risk their income and reputation by agreeing with the Apollo hoax. That lie is so well imbedded in the public mind that it’s almost like suicide to question it. So I can see that as a possibility for some such as Richard Dolan. When I broach the subject among some smart open minded people I get the strangest silence in return. They don’t want to offend me by calling me crazy so they shut up.
I don’t really think that’s true any more, especially with those who keep blabbing to ‘follow the evidence WHEREVER it leads,’ and so forth. Still, you’re right in the sense that the moon landing lie is so big, and so wrapped up in America’s (official) view of itself, that it’s become an article of de facto religious faith, even among folks who have no problem exposing stuff like 9/11 and JFK. Either that, or they are following orders. IMO, and based on my communications with these people, it’s usually the latter.
Allan, at 6:26 the first video says: “if those little dots are visible to the camera, why aren’t stars which are many times brighter”. It means some details on the wings of the ISS. That is not true. Try to photograph the moon in a way where you’ll see the details of the surface. You’ll have to use a pretty short exposure and then there won’t be any stars visible any more. That picture of the ISS mentioned in the video is fake of course and definitely not made in space. But still, if it was really made in space, they would have to use a very short exposure time and low ISO. I’m not sure, any camera can even do that. Maybe with a strong ND filter. I photographed the ISS using 1/2000 of a sec. Longer than that and the ISS became a bright dot. My pics can be found on the cluesforum by the way. The brightness relations in space have to be the same as here on Earth. The stars will be brighter, the ISS too. The atmosphere just works as a ND filter on the camera.
Can you link us to the Cluesforum page?
https://cluesforum.info/
https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=720&start=1305
well this aren’t any good pictures, yet still. It looks the same every time. And pictures of others show similar structures. I simply followed the ISS using the maximum zoom (x69) in my sons Nikon P900 and pressed the trigger as fast as I could. I always get many similar pictures. Everything else there is black then. There is only this one dot and this is the ISS. No stars visible. For stars I would have to use a 1000 times longer exposure time.
Try to photograph the Jupiter and his moons using different exposure times. If you see the moons, the Jupiter becomes a bright dot. If you want to see details from Jupiter, the moons won’t be visible anymore.
Barbara, I see why you were hesitant to link to the Clueforum page (given Simon’s insults), but no worries re Simon Shack; I’m 90% sure he’s a psy op of the Miles Mathis caliber.
I used to be friendly with Shack, even sent him a copy of Banditos, which he siad he loved. Then I responded to his ‘rockets won’t work in a vacuum’ crapola and he made a fool of himself and eventually (after I exposed his misdirection on another topic) branded me a spook and Hollywood clown and banned me.
Re the rocket in a vacuum I had asked him if, say, a 9mm pistol would work up there and would he mind if I pointed it at him and pulled the trigger (in space). He said no problem. I showed him a 9mm going off in a swimming pool, etc., and he realized what an idiot he was. Point being, if a gun will work in space, so will the recoil, and THAT is how rockets basically work. Many continuous explosions
with the recoil propelling the rocket. For me, that he STILL says rockets don’t work in a vacuum, is strong evidence that he’s dirty. (Also search for my post on Simon, his misdirection, etc.)
I also was premature in dismissing your comments. You said a couple things that were a bit iffy but in general you are correct re the exposure and shutter speeds. It’s a complex issue, which is how NASA has gotten away with the ‘no stars’ photos all these years.
Let’s put this way: Simon Shack’s TYCHOS model is major disinfo/distraction – and yet, a big clue at the same time.
Again: please link to the Cluesforum page. Also, what was the ISO when you shot the ISS at 1/2000. That sounds ridiculous. It IS ridiculousm, as is your first point (the moon would be way brighter than the shady details I mention). Your photography ‘revelations’ are incorrect. I know photography. Why the disinfo?
sorry Allan, the link to the page is a few comments above. I don’t know how to link to Simon’s post which contains my pictures but it is on the same page. Also you can read the EXIF data yourself. It was actually 1/1000 of a sec and ISO-800 I was using on this pictures. But I also used higher ISO and shorter times too many times. It looks the same except for some more noise. I don’t do disinfo Allan, I told you to do it yourself. You can photograph the Jupiter every night. Try to get some details of the planet and there are no moons visible. Or photograph the Moon so you’ll see the craters and you will see no stars anymore. A satellite photographed from a close distance will reflect much more light then the moon, no matter if here on Earth or up there in space. So you can’t have both: the stars and details of the satellite. Or simply use 1/1000 exposure and 800 ISO and try to get some stars that way.
The only living things ever sent above LEO were animals, and it’s not clear whether the electrics failed first or the animals did. Suffice it to say, that even milspec/radiation-hard micro-electronics are incapable of operating within the Van Allen belts. Lead shielding is required that renders craft uneconomic.
Hence all photography of Earth from space is from LEO (composited as necessary).
The SSP is a psyop that helps distract people from the secret mining program (“Don’t look down. Look up!”). If there’s a breakaway civilisation, it’s underground, and populated 99% by those born there (The Island, Logan’s Run, etc.).
This may be the root of the rumour that Walmarts are connected to a subterranean network (Morlocks & Eloi).
Morlocks indeed!
Aloha
The Soviet dog (‘Leica’ or something) apparently died of heat exhaustion, which is interesting, if true (this is from contemporary articles), since -as far as I know – there was little if any insulation on the early US flights — John Glenn, say. (Correct me if I’m wrong, someone.)
Like my archived video showing the Mercury capsule tipping way over in the wind tunnel, this would count as evidence that the whole thing chem rocket program has been a fraud.
They may have realized back then (the late 50s) that man wasn’t going ‘anywhere’ and the US and USSR agreed to bolster each others’ fakeries. A thought.
I’m pretty sure there was a very strong motive to get into space, but the discovery of the Van Allen belts put a glass ceiling on ‘beyond LEO’ – at least until such time as space elevators could be built, that would be able to raise enough lead to build hardened space craft, that could then reach The Moon and build a space craft factory, etc.
If there was any SSP it was the early stages in which the VAB were discovered to be impenetrable.
Don’t you think it a bit surprising that they used animals in the first place?
Naturally, material regarded as suitable for public consumption (Laika, etc.) is a fraction of what actually happened – if it wasn’t a sanitised ‘reconstruction’. They wouldn’t have hesitated to use death-row Gulag prisoners on day release. The only reason to use animals is a smaller vehicle and a tad less rocket fuel.
Thank you, Allan! If it weren’t for your SOLO efforts in discerning How The World Really Works, humankind just would not know what to think at this point in time!
@ Arthur
Bwahahhahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaa(snarky snort) that reaction is more of a poke at myself for thinking the same thing sometimes) however we are doing this together and Allan’s flavor and take on this makes the rest of us not feel so alone when we see the Quandary we are in- just like when Neo wakes up in the matrix
Alan is a bit like Morpheus-
thank you Alan for caring to do what you it helps some of us play quasi super heroes in our simple day to day lives- keep shedding light on the darkness that is continually crafted to enslave humanity.
Aloha T
One question is why types like Arthur waste their time here. It’s a real question. Is he a shill? Jealous that a handful of people listen to me? Whatever problems I have, his are shallower, since he doesn’t impart any actual information in his ‘clever’ jabs.
Wherever you have a forum/comment section with a high signal to noise ratio, it is the job of shills to degrade/devalue it. They get paid irrespective of success.
If you attempt to suppress crude shills, you are allocated sophisticated shills. They rely upon unsophisticated commenters to help them drown the signal in noise (taunt & rouse unproductive argument).
The only people who’ll find you, are either those already up to speed, or shills who are paid to impair further knowledge transfer. 99% of apparent newbies/neophytes who stumble across Allan Weisbecker are shills.
Sophisticated commenters use shills’ knowledge of targets, to determine when they’ve encroached upon a target.
Allan poses the MISDIRECTING and AD HOMINEM possibility of me being a “shill”, despite the fact that we have been corresponding for years now, and he speaks of me as if he has no idea who I am.
The weak minded sycophants who follow you jump in and do the same, when my email address and website are posted for anyone to easily discover who I am.
In fact, I have been a DEFENDER and PROMOTER of his work, as you can read here:
http://www.unlearning.org/people-who-fell-for-9-11-will-fall-for-anything/
But what Allan does not like about me is that I call him out on the same bullshit behavior he accuses his targets of. In private, he gets all huffy, comes up with some lame excuse to ignore his faults, then turns to bashing me publicly in this forum.
I really don’t care what Allan, or the rest of you think about me. I’ve been in this game on the internet for 16 years. What I’ve found is that, despite the NOBLE and LOFTY intentions you all say you have for the world, when it comes to CONFRONTING THE EVIL, most people are COWARDS, which is WHY we have the world we have today.
There is your answer to How The World Really Works, Allan. It’s PURE FEAR, plain and simple.
When humans allow LOVE, in all its beautiful IRRATIONALITY, to LEAD THE WAY, then incredible SOLUTIONS and POWER arise.
And Allan, if you are truly wondering why I am here, it is because your suffering, egoistic ranting ENTERTAINS me. Great job and keep up the good work!
You are quite shrill, Arthur, and I’m sorry if I don’t remember our many exchanges. Must be my age. Or something.
Love your great posts Allan…looking forward to more!.
Thanks, Brett. I don’t mind hearing that.