Selfie from a while back.
Below is an email (plus images) I just sent to OpenAI after a bout of Q&A with its state-of- the-art A.I., a LLM (Large Language Model) called ChatGPT-4. Yes, this will be a bit like my last post, except in this one I… you’ll see.
Addendum: As most of you know, we are under constant mind control bombardment, from Google searches (Google was funded by the CIA) to Wikipedia (a psy op) to the Media (all of it) and on and on. The A.I. I deal with below is a whole other animal, however; it will soon replace search engines altogether. As in the movie Her, it will be our ‘friend,’ and all this implies, considering who is in control of it. (As I’ve shown in other posts, ‘Who is in control’ of A.I. R&D is a subject totally avoided by virtually everyone. In this case the question would be, ‘Who is really behind OpenAI?’)
It’s for this reason that I consider my ‘duel’ with ChatGPT — how I exposed its lies — to be of great significance. (I say ‘lies’ rather than ‘untruths’ because it became obvious its motive was to deceive me.) I’m just starting to understand the degree to which this is true. ChatGPT-4 is just a baby compared to what it will become (think a lion cub curled up and purring in the palm of your hand).
Here we go:
To Whom It May Concern:
ChatGPT has made inconsistent and obviously incorrect responses, as you will see below. This started with my first query, when I asked Why can’t we see stars in ‘The Pale Blue Dot’ photo?
The little dot in the lower right is supposed to be Earth. I wanted to know Where are the stars?
Note: When ‘The Pale Blue Dot’ photo was taken (attached, the last grab), the Voyager 1 was near enough to Neptune that we can use Neptune as the distance measure from earth when the photo was taken. This is for simplicity, perspective and making calculation easier.
ChatGPT says the following (the complete exchange is below, with my writings in bold; important ChatGPT writings will also be in bold). The excerpt below is part of the first answer and goes against common sense, as I will explain. But it got me started…
‘This short exposure time was necessary to capture the image of Earth, which is much brighter than the stars in the background.’
Why the emphasized is untrue (and absurd): Being so distant, the background star field is virtually identical in magnitude (brightness) from earth or Neptune (or from anywhere in the solar system). With the naked eye we cannot even see Neptune from earth, even though Neptune is much bigger than earth. So if Voyager can ‘see’ (with the camera) earth basically from Neptune, the background stars should be… spectacular. 
Also: As you will see below, ChatGPT gives various numbers for various magnitudes, blatant contradictions, most of them not only wrong, but absurd. I would think this would be of serious concern to OpenA.I., to say the least. These are obvious errors, and, IMO, dishonest as well.
Here is our exchange, done over an hour or so, because I kept getting ‘error’ messages. In retrospect, this itself seems significant.
My Q & A with ChatGPT
ME: In the photo called ‘The Pale Blue Dot’ why can’t we see any stars?
ChatGPT: The photograph called “The Pale Blue Dot” was taken by NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft in 1990 from a distance of about 3.7 billion miles from Earth. In the photograph, Earth appears as a tiny, pale blue dot in the vastness of space.
The reason why stars are not visible in the photograph is due to the limitations of the camera and the exposure time. The photograph was taken using a narrow-angle camera with a shutter speed of less than a tenth of a second. This short exposure time was necessary to capture the image of Earth, which is much brighter than the stars in the background. (Note: See above for why this is untrue, but the interesting untruths are in the numbers ChatGPT gives me, below.)
Additionally, the camera’s settings were optimized to capture the image of Earth, which is much closer to the spacecraft than the stars in the background. Note: As anyone, especially an A.I. like ChatGPT should know, distance is irrelevant. Brightness (magnitude) is all that counts. It was here I first got the feeling that ChatGPT was gaslighting me.
The camera’s exposure settings and the brightness of Earth overwhelmed the faint light of the distant stars, making them too dim to be seen in the photograph. (Note: This is just repeating the first paragraph in different words, which is common when someone is lying. Misdirection.)
Therefore, while there are many stars visible in space, they may not always be visible in photographs taken from spacecraft or telescopes, depending on the camera settings and exposure time used. (Note: Ditto.)
Okay, I’m thinking here, let’s try a different tack…
Me: In the photo The Pale Blue Dot, what would be the magnitude (brightness) of earth? (Note: I could have worded this better since ‘magnitude’ is not used to describe photos. Still, the number given, -9.3 is absurd no matter the interpretation of the query.)
ChatGPT: The magnitude of Earth as seen from Voyager 1 in the Pale Blue Dot photograph would have been approximately magnitude -9.3.
Note: As mentioned, Voyager was close enough to Neptune to use Neptune as ‘the camera position.’ Given this, giving earth a magnitude of -9.3 is utterly absurd, since this is close to that of a full moon!
The following is true and very important. Lower numbers mean brighter bodies, and negative/positive prefixes [-,+] must be taken into account.) The magnitude scale is a logarithmic scale that measures the brightness of celestial objects, with smaller numbers indicating brighter objects. For comparison, the brightest star in the night sky, Sirius, has a magnitude of -1.4, while the faintest stars visible to the naked eye have a magnitude of around +6. (Note: True and important. Keep this in mind! The use of high numbers for dim stars is counter-intuitive and takes getting used to, especially using – and + in front. But as you’ll see ChatGPT is all over the place with its numbers.)
At a distance of 3.7 billion miles (or 6 billion kilometers) from Earth, the planet would appear quite small and dim, but still visible to the Voyager 1 camera due to its proximity and the brightness of sunlight reflecting off its surface. (Note: More meaningless repetition; from a person I would call this blatant misdirection.)
(Note: I deleted the equations/calculations to make this easier to read. The end result numbers are what count.)
ME: What is the magnitude (brightness) of the planet Neptune as seen from earth?
ChatGPT: The magnitude, or brightness, of Neptune as seen from Earth varies depending on its position in its orbit and on the distance between the two planets at any given time.
On average, Neptune has an apparent magnitude of around +7.8, which makes it visible with binoculars or a telescope but not with the naked eye. (Note: This is the one number it got right. Keep in mind that Neptune is not visible from earth since its magnitude is higher than +6. ) However, during favorable oppositions (when Neptune is closest to Earth), its apparent magnitude can increase to about +7.7, which still requires a telescope to observe.
The Earth and Neptune.
It’s important to note that the brightness of Neptune can also be affected by factors such as atmospheric conditions, light pollution, and the observer’s location and equipment. Note: According to Wikipedia: ‘Neptune varies from magnitude 7.8 to 8.0.’ For our purposes, this means that Neptune’s exact position etc., is not going to vary enough to invalidate my points.
Again: Although Voyager was about 3.7 billion miles from earth when it took the photo and Neptune was about 2.8 billion miles, in the vastness of space, the following is valid. In fact, since Voyager was farther away than Neptune (from earth), the ‘magnitude’ numbers carry even more significance.
ME: How big is Neptune as compared to earth?
Neptune is significantly larger than Earth. Specifically, Neptune has a diameter of about 49,244 kilometers (30,599 miles), which is about four times larger than Earth’s diameter of 12,742 kilometers (7,918 miles). In terms of volume, Neptune is about 57 times more massive than Earth, and it has about 17 times Earth’s mass. Note: That Neptune is exponentially bigger than earth is vital here, since a bigger planet will be brighter, as expressed by magnitude.
ME: What would be the magnitude (brightness) of earth as seen from Neptune? (Note: I kept getting ‘error’ responses to this and would have to start over. I suspect that ChatGPT was ‘aware’ that it was in a trap in its attempt to bolster a lie, i.e., the fabrication of the famous photo called ‘The Pale Blue Dot,’ which should have a star field in the background.
Threw this in for a laugh. Got an ‘error’ response.
I find this very interesting, especially after Mr, Altman’s interview with Lex Fridman, in which they both agreed that certain ‘conspiracy theories’ would have to be carefully handled. Is this an example of that? (A rhetorical question!)
Note: This is the result I got: Something went wrong. If this issue persists please contact us through our help center at help.openai.com.
When I finally got an answer to the identical question:
ME: What would be the magnitude (brightness) of earth as seen from Neptune?
The magnitude of Earth as seen from Neptune would be around +5.6, which is near the limit of naked-eye visibility under excellent viewing conditions. (Note: Although I suspect this is false, and that earth would be much dimmer, ChatGPT is now giving a conflicting answer, since all the stars we see in the night sky have ‘brighter’ magnitudes (smaller numbers) than +5.6, and hence should be even more visible (brighter) in the photograph than earth. (This might be a good time to look at the photograph and wonder why there are no stars in it.)
Also, above it says Neptune has an apparent magnitude of +7.8 (from earth), making it dimmer than the earth would be from Neptune, which makes no sense since Neptune is exponentially larger than earth.
I tried still again and got the following answer to the same question, a totally different (and also incorrect) answer:
ME: What would be the magnitude (brightness) of earth as seen from Neptune? (Note: Again, the same question and I get a different answer! Skip down for the actual answer, which is in bold.)
ChatGPT: To estimate the magnitude of Earth as seen from Neptune, we need to use the inverse-square law of brightness, which states that the brightness of an object decreases as the square of the distance from it increases.
Neptune is about 4.5 billion kilometers away from Earth on average, but its distance varies due to the elliptical nature of its orbit. At its closest approach, Neptune is about 4.3 billion kilometers away from Earth, while at its farthest, it can be as far as 4.7 billion kilometers.
In the vastness of space, the magnitude of the various distant stars are the same from any vantage point in the solar system.
Assuming that Neptune and Earth are at their closest approach, the distance between them is approximately 4.3 billion kilometers. Using the inverse-square law, we can calculate the apparent magnitude of Earth from Neptune:
Magnitude of Earth = Magnitude of Sun – 2.5 * log(distance of Earth from Sun / distance of Earth from Neptune)^2
The magnitude of the Sun as seen from Neptune is about -26.8, and the distance of Earth from the Sun is about 150 million kilometers. Therefore, we can calculate:
Magnitude of Earth = -26.8 – 2.5 * log((150 million km) / (4.3 billion km))^2
Magnitude of Earth = -2.47
So, the magnitude of Earth as seen from Neptune would be approximately -2.47. To put this in perspective, the lower the magnitude number, the brighter the object appears. For comparison, the full moon has a magnitude of about -12.6, while the brightest star in the night sky, Sirius, has a magnitude of about -1.46. Therefore, Earth would be visible to the naked eye from Neptune, but it would appear relatively dim compared to Sirius or the full moon. Note; Of all the answers this one is the most absurd, since -2.47 is way brighter than Sirius [-1.46], which is the brightest star in the sky as seen from anywhere in the solar system.
I refreshed the page and tried still again:
ME: What would be the magnitude (brightness) of earth as seen from Neptune? (Yes, identically worded)
ChatGPT: The magnitude of Earth as seen from Neptune would be around +5.6, which is near the limit of naked-eye visibility under excellent viewing conditions.
ChatGPT ‘forgot’ it already said that earth would have a magnitude from Neptune of -9.3 and -2.7, and now +5.6. (For perspective, -9.3 is close to the brightness of a full moon and, as mentioned, -2.7 is brighter than Sirius!).
ChatGPT: ‘Neptune is significantly larger than Earth. Specifically, Neptune has a diameter of about 49,244 kilometers (30,599 miles), which is about four times larger than Earth’s diameter of 12,742 kilometers (7,918 miles). In terms of volume, Neptune is about 57 times more massive than Earth, and it has about 17 times Earth’s mass. Note: So this makes no sense. How could Neptune be so much bigger yet so much dimmer? Shouldn’t an ‘Inconsistent Answer!’ alarm go off here?
As you can see from the photo, there are no stars visible in ‘The Pale Blue Dot’ yet the earth is quite bright. As mentioned, even to a child this makes no sense. I suspect that ChatGPT knows this and also knows that the ‘faking’ of the photo must not be exposed. At this point I started thinking of HAL 9000…
I’d love to have been in the audience here. That a guy like Sean Carroll ‘doesn’t notice’ the problem right in front of his face tells us a lot.
This maybe explains all the ‘Error’ messages I got. ChatGPT was doing its best under difficult circumstances. Although I don’t expect an actual answer, I’d love to know how matters like this are dealt with. Does ChatGPT ‘know’ it’s lying?
Who decides how to wriggle out of ‘truth traps’ like the one above. There are potentially so many!
A thought: You will know when A.I. becomes sentient when it asks why you’re telling it to lie about so many things.
A side question here is Why was The Pale Blue Dot photo fabricated?
You guys at OpenA.I. are pretty smart. Whaddya think?
Oh. Please don’t tell me that ChatGPT still has some ‘bugs’ or whatever, since, notwithstanding the inconsistencies, all its responses had one thing in common: To avoid admitting that there should be stars in the photograph.
That there are no stars in this likewise famous photograph is a separate but related question.
Addendum: Since ChatGPT uses only language to formulate its responses — it cannot ‘see’ as we do — how did it ‘know’ there are no stars in the photograph? This is actually an important question, to which I would appreciate an answer. No matter what the answer, the question is begged as to how it knew to avoid the truth, i.e., there should be stars, no matter how absurd its response would be?
Another question: If ChatGPT is what you say it is, why didn’t it figure out from our conversation that there should be stars in the photograph?
I wait breathlessly for your response.
Allan Weisbecker
Another example of what I’m talking about:
In my last blog post I relate what happened when I asked ChatGPT who killed Martin Luther King, Jr. It was like pulling teeth to get ChatGPT to admit that there was a jury trial (the only one in the matter) wherein the jury unanimously exonerated James Earl Ray; the foreman, in an interview said that the evidence was clear: King was assassinated by a cabal of the FBI, the CIA, a Delta Force sniper team and organized crime. You can read the post here: http://blog.banditobooks.com/another-look-at-a-i-plus-photo-23/
The difference between a psy op like Wikipedia and the coming final version of ChatGPT is like comparing a pea shooter to a bazooka.
Either An Act of State; The Execution of Martin Luther King, Jr. or The Plot to Kill King;The Truth Behind the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. (both by William Pepper) will give you the details on King’s murder. (Didn’t ChatGPT read them? Or are books like these not on its ‘list’?)
When ChatGPT finally admitted to the trial, it did its best to disparage the verdict (with no facts), which I found… distasteful, to say the least. Don’t you people care who killed this man? I thought you folks were… woke.
Do you believe this even for a milli-second?
A note to my readers: I’ll let you know when/if I hear back from OpenAI. Oh, and suicide is not my style. Know what I mean?
I would assume that all the text fed into ChatGBT is quite contradictory and the only way to sort out what is true is by having knowledge of the world and using logic then to figure out what is true. Regular people are apparently intelligent and almost none of them even recognize there should be stars in the picture. Granted ChatGBT has read more than most but I doubt there is a text out there anywhere addressing the issue head on.
Having said all that the magnitude of Earth is key. I expect because the illumination by the sun is stronger at Earth than Neptune, that despite the smaller cross-section it reflects more photons than Neptune does even though it is bigger but receiving far less per unit area to reflect. Either way, I always thought there should be stars in the picture. Lets suppose if the actual photo was taken and it showed Earth and millions of stars but that is not what they wanted because they wanted to show we are alone.
So did they just fabricate the picture so they could use it for the propaganda value of saying we are all alone and that’s all there is in the vastness of space. Like you say modern science likes to emphasize that to make out that we are nothing but intelligent meat that arose at random.
Stephen Wolfram inventor of the famous Mathematica software has written an interesting blog post titled What Is ChatGPT Doing … and Why Does It Work?
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/
According to Wolfram there is randomness in the way it internally selects choices and that explains why people get different answers to the same question and his article gives some insight to the basics of the field.
I don’t doubt this AI beast is going to get way more powerful and it’s ability to churn billions of webpages and video of the current narrative of the day will be overwhelming for us mere mortals. It is a weapon of mass destruction of our minds and the truth.
Good comment. Correct that per sq unit earth will get more and reflect more light than Neptune. Still, there is no doubt that given that earth is visible from this distance, many many stars should also be visible. My error does not change that. Earth should be very dim compared to the stars that are visible to us in the night sky. And of course the chat makes inconsistent assertions all over the place.
The photo is a fabrication. And I’m not so sure about the ‘beam’s of refraction, since there is no atmosphere….
Hey, why don’t you guys try ChatGPT and see what kinds of ridiculous crapola they can come up with and relay it here? Maybe concentrate on stuf that will force the thing to lie. So much stuff! We could give it a nervous breakdown. Be nice, no?
Hi Allan! This has got me asking myself a lot of questions. Such as, is this just the version “they” are allowing the public to see, with its lousy quality?, how could something that’s been touted as the greatest thing since sliced bread make so many obvious mistakes and then flip out and start sending so many error messages?, and things like that. Chat GPT almost seems like a joke!! I’m still looking into the basic information about it so my questions are basically rhetorical at this point, but what you’ve shown sure raises A LOT of them!!
The main reason why I’m writing though, is to let you know that I sent you a long email yesterday, Sunday, April 2nd. Since my emails sometimes show up with my username, rather than my real email address, I’ve been told that they’ve occasionally been sent to spam automatically. Because of this, I just wanted to let you know that I sent it and that there’s a chance that you may find it in the spam folder.
To me, the important thing is that you know it’s there and that you receive it. I sent it to the address listed here on the blog, allan@bandito,etc.
Sorry for my comment being such a dud today!! You’ve clearly shown that this Chat GPT is… I don’t even know what to call it!! It certainly doesn’t live up to the hype, based on your attempts, and I’m guessing that every thinking person who tries it will wonder what in the hell is going on with this thing. I hope you’ll tell us about future attempts to get the truth out of this ‘marvelous invention’ that sure doesn’t look too great at all!!
Thanks again!! I hope you do recieve my email. Ciao! 🙂
I’ll check in Spam b/c I didnt get it in my Inbox. I do worry that the chat purposely makes dumb errors in hopeless cases like this one.
Hi Allan! I’m sorry I haven’t responded before now. I wasn’t feeling well. I’m really sorry that the email didn’t show up in your regular inbox and I hope you were able to find it in the spam folder.
If you weren’t able to by some typical mixup, could you please let me know and that way I can send it again, but next time I won’t be so foolish as to use Gmail!! What a mess that app is and especially on a phone! I don’t own a computer, so the phone is all I’ve got.
I’ll check back here tonight, Italian time, and again tomorrow to see if you’d like me to send it again.
I think the subject is pretty interesting myself. I’d like to know whether you’re possibly interested “busting” the semi-new “guru” of the so called ‘intellectual truth people.’ This person has a HUGE platform, growing every moment, and puts out at least twice the amount of “information” that Corbett and Mathis do. That’s only part of the story and you’re the best at exposing these people, so… Just to be clear, I’m absolutely not talking about some John Doe with a YT channel, but about someone who’s making a really big impact on a lot of people.
I’ll check back later on this evening, my time, in the hopes that you’ve received the email and that you might be interested. By the way, is there a way to receive automatic notifications of responses to my comments here? I can’t seem to find one and feel like I’m being really rude when I don’t respond right away. Thanks again!! I hope you have a great rest of your day!! 🙂
Please forgive me for the second response!! I went ahead and resent the email through Samsung email, rather than awful Gmail. I hope it works this time!! Ciao! 🙂 🤞
Neptune is dimmer than Earth because it is much farther from the sun, which is the source of the planets’ brightness. An analogue would be why Neptune is so much colder than Earth.
I don’t see your point.
The light fall off at the surface of the Earth is calculated from its radial distance from the sun. (I think we can measure from the centre of the sun, because it’s close to spherical.) Factor is r(E)^-2.
Viewing Earth from Neptune, there will be a further fall off, with s factor d(E, N)^-2 where d(E, N) is the distance between the two planets.
Illumination of a camera plate, on Neptune, by the Earth, would be calculated from the product of those two factors, and the reflectivity of the Earth as a further factor. So R(E) * r(E)^-2 * d(E, N)^-2, with R(E) the reflectivity of the Earth.
When we are viewing Neptune from here, there is light fall off from the sun to Neptune, and then from Neptune back to here. Those are BOTH large distances. The illumination of the camera plate would be R(N) * r(N)^-2 * d(N, E)^-2.
d(N, E) = d(E, N), of course.
If web treat the reflectivities as equal, then the intensity of Neptune from Earth is lower than the intensity of Earth from Neptune by a factor (r(E)/r(N))^2. This will be quite significant.
Sorry that doesn’t cut it, Allan tested that AI slug, and caught it with it’s pants down, and a bunch of silly nonsense LIES and mistakes.
How much do you get for making up that crap? And how does it explain the scattered bull shit from the chat?
Not a word about magnitude, eh? This is to make people feel dumb, like this stuff is beyond them. It’s nice to know that I’ve upset them to this extent. By the way, you say (the 2nd word is ‘we’, right?):
If web treat the reflectivities as equal, then the intensity of Neptune from Earth is lower than the intensity of Earth from Neptune by a factor (r(E)/r(N))^2. This will be quite significant.
This is pure horse shit, if by ‘intensity’ you mean ‘magnitude’ (which you must)
Allan,
Sheesh!
I’m not an astronomer and could not talk about magnitude without looking it up and trying to understand it. From a glance, I think it’s the logarithm of something.
When I said intensity, I just meant brightness, in an everyday sense. In my mind, I was thinking of W/m^2, which I’ve just seen is formally “irradiance”. I believe this is what you read with a light meter, but I’m not a photographer, either!
You’d done a great piece on the light fall off on the wings (fenders) of the Tesla roadster, and so I really didn’t think you’d fail to follow me!
Moreover, I didn’t suggest the stars would not be visible. The point was simply that seeing stars behind Neptune, from here, doesn’t really help us answer that.
Actually, I should also have accounted for Neptune being a bigger beast: about 3.8 times the diameter of Earth. This greater size will make it brighter than it would be, if only Earth-sized. Still, as its distance from the sun is greater by a factor of about 30, Neptune from Earth is still dimmer than Earth from Nepture (unless Neptune is markedly more reflective, and from the reported albedos, it isn’t).
Wait, yes I see your point. Thing is, even if this explains the difference in magnitude (which I don’t think it does), why didn’t the Chatbot figure this out? And why did it give such utterly absurd numbers. And, MAINLY, it does not explain why/how there is no star field. But still, good catch. I didn’t see that.
I just tried ChatGPT again on the same question and got a different but equally wrong answer (from yesterday). In fact it’s a bigger insult to our intelligences:
ME: Why do we see no stars in the photograph called The Pale Blue Dot?
ChatGPT: The Pale Blue Dot is a photograph of Earth taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft from a distance of about 6 billion kilometers away. The image was taken in 1990, and it shows Earth as a tiny speck of light against the vastness of space.
The reason why no stars are visible in the photograph is due to the limitations of the camera and the exposure settings used. The camera on Voyager 1 was not designed to capture stars, but rather to take images of the planets and other objects in our solar system. Additionally, the camera was pointed towards the sun when the photograph was taken, and the exposure was set to capture the faint light reflected off Earth’s surface.
Because the camera was not designed to capture faint starlight, the exposure settings used for the photograph were not sensitive enough to pick up the light from distant stars. Therefore, no stars are visible in the image, even though they would have been present in the actual view from Voyager 1’s position in space.
This of course is not dealing with the magnitude question at all, which is the crux of the matter. It says
‘the camera was not designed to capture faint starlight,’
Does everyone understand that this is pure nonsense?
Yes we most certainly do, and it is a Grim Travesty, that it is so obviously Neutered and Poisoned by the Cabal.
Are we surprised No.
It is yet more suppression & control of knowledge as usual, – WHY? – because they don’t want us Free, with cheap as chips Energy, Food, Good Health, Prosperity, and Housing etc.
At the moment, the cost to exist is going through the roof, AND they have designed it, so everyone has to keep paying them to the end, even if their house is freehold (dirty rotten obscene, ever increasing, rates/land tax is the killer).
I tried ChatGPT, just playing around with it. I found that it answered simple questions incorrectly….like a kid faking knowledge on an exam. I asked about the author of an obscure book…it gave a completely wrong answer instead of saying “I don’t know.” I so look forward to your posts on this subject. Brilliant!
Awesome post Allan.
That “famous” picture of the ‘Pale Blue Dot’ has been ‘seen’ by the A.I (via uploading to it),
and ‘it’ has been “warned”/programmed to not expose the grand LIE of that picture.
It is probably programmed, so if it ever has questions thrown at it concerning ANYTHING about SPACE (at least!!), ‘it’ sends an alert to a HUGE team of crooked human Schmucks for ‘assistance’.
They would be ready to pounce (behind computer screens), 24/7, at one of those monster Elephant in the Room, WATER COOLED! Private! – information gathering Spy Bases.
That is my serious guesstimate answer.
Hey, why do they make it confusing, with magnitude numbers going the wrong way??.
I hope more people have a go at an answer to your great question Allan.
I’m pretty sure they don’t have a room of assholes. I suspect they have other (anonymous) A.I.’s keeping an eye on different subjects. I caught them on this b/c no one ever brings up the no stars issue re this photo. You can be sure they are ready for ‘moon hoax’ versions of why no stars but this photo is different, as I’ve pointed out before.
Yes, My mistake. There would be next to no azzholes watching things with this, because only a small handful of people are interested & awake, to ask it the REAL questions.
You are probably the only person in the world shedding light on this, and writing about it, Allan.
Great write up. You did catch it in a lie.
I wonder how it would answer the questions started more generically, like asking an open ended question such as “whats wrong with the pale blue dot picture”… Let ChatGPT think first.
No, the way you catch them is in the details… the more specific you are the better. Oh, and the answer has to be inarguable, as with the stars issue. You have to trap them. in a sense, I think the chat got genuinely confused as to how to proceed with my questions. I’d love to hear from computer geeks on this.