I’m sending this right out with the hope that my last two videos are still fresh in your mind. If not, they are short, maybe give ‘em another look. Start with this one then finish up with this one. I hope and trust you understand that these are absolute proof of visual fakery. That they are faked ‘R & D failures’ means that the fakery goes back to the very beginning of Spacex. (Why would they fake ‘failures’? Because they’re telling a story and stories have their ups and downs. Remember when Elon had three straight failures — via fakery as you see in the vids — and only enough money for one more launch? Tension! Drama! All part of the ‘Life and Times of Elon Musk.’)
Maybe so, maybe so…
Like its papa program, NASA itself, Spacex was planned well ahead and hence we can be sure that major repercussions loom. We can also assume that Elon Musk was picked and groomed quite a while back, so his ‘legend’ (his ‘history’) holds up to all but the most diligent scrutiny.
On the day I posted the vids I sent emails to a couple of the alt media figures on my list. I did this partly for laughs but was also hoping to get back something ‘good,’ i.e., revelatory of something I didn’t know before. The two I picked were Richard D. Hall and Andrew Johnson. These two are of particular interest because – with Hall as the ‘anchor man’ – they did an excellent exposé on the fraudulent Mars Rover Missions. Yes, I’ve recommended this video before and still do.
Thing is, the responses I got from both regarding my Musk Space Fraud evidence were… suspicious to say the least; in Johnson’s case, especially so.
Headed north, back to Griz country…
Well, I didn’t hear back from Hall (a bad sign, considering the strength of the evidence in the vids). So I’m asking myself, could a guy who exposed the Mars Rover Frauds be a limited hangout? Sure. It’d be a surprise but… hey, I hardly remember the last day wherein something didn’t surprise me.
But I got a quick answer from Johnson. I’ll paste in our correspondence (from today and yesterday). Here’s my first:
Andrew,
Musk is faking his R&D ‘failures’, as my new videos prove:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vgkFJfb6Cc
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Inufy4Ch8dc
There is no explanation for the above other than the Musk ‘mission’ is a complete fraud, including the launches.
If you figure I’m wrong, please explain. I can see no other explanation. (I have several new videos aside from these.)
That they are somehow faking the launches would seem to be big news. I’m only asking you to check the evidence then, if it’s genuine, pass it on.
allan
Here’s his reply, a few hours later:
Hi
I watched both your videos… I don’t think the first one is conclusive and neither is the second really. However, as I think I said before, even if Musk is doing “real stuff,” there is no progression from what was being done 60 years ago. I think it would be risky to his business interests if he really was faking it.
Please stop reading here and give the above a good look, with your critical thinking cap on. I’ll analyze it myself in a moment but I don’t want to put thoughts in your head. I’m curious if, in the end, you’ll agree with me. (This is why it’s important that the videos are fresh in your mind).
Nasty, nasty… I was breathing this a couple hours later. No wonder I’m… what was I saying?
No! Don’t peek. Think about what he’s saying for a bit longer. Maybe go back and view the vids once more…..
Okay. Here’s my response to Johnson’s response:
Andrew,
My analysis of your response (my comments in bold):
Hi
I watched both your videos… I don’t think the first one is conclusive and neither is the second really. So you figure a mainly carbon-based fuel explosion could instantly vaporize a one million pound Falcon 9, including many tons of titanium? Twice? (Remember 9/11, Fl 77, the Pentagon?) By the way, re the explosion in the videos: I could create them with Final Cut Pro on my Mac.
However, as I think I said before, even if Musk is doing “real stuff,” there is no progression from what was being done 60 years ago. Why the misdirection? (That Musk is shown using archaic chemical rocket technology is, if anything, evidence of fakery, not a refutation; at best your statement is moot, irrelevant. If I’m misunderstanding your meaning, please clarify.)
I think it would be risky to his business interests if he really was faking it. Sorry, but more misdirection: Like 9/11, the fakery would be with the cooperation of Deep State/Intel, NASA, and, of course, the media, so his ‘business interests’ would not be threatened — quite the reverse, given the publicity.
Your above sentence assumes that if it were faked, it would have been Musk on his own behind the fakery. Yes, then it would have been a risk all right. In fact, doing it on his own would have been fucking absurd. Musk is officially partnered up with NASA, and since Spacex’s fakery is off limits to the media (MSM and ‘alt media,’ apparently), how is it at risk at all? Your sentence doesn’t make sense, does it?
Andrew: This is the best week I’ve had! No worries, my friend!
And anyway, don’t the laws of physics (the vaporization temperature of titanium, etc) trump ‘business’ theory?
In the interest of full disclosure, I’m working on the theory that all of the alt media are under orders to avoid exposing the Musk Space Fraud. (Your response to my videos was a help in verifying this.) All but the flat earth bunch, who are told to go there, but to tread lightly. (This discredits by association anyone like me.)
More disclosure (and at the risk of raising your blood pressure further), I should make you aware of this:
Link to ‘Why is Dr. Judy Wood On My List?’
Others of my posts may be of interest also…
Allan
I got a surprise response from the above. Here it is, having arrive about an hour ago:
Mr Weisbecker
What exactly do you want from me? If you want anything, why do you want it?
You can just “do your own thing” can’t you? You clearly have your own views/conclusions and opinions and I really don’t understand why you need mine… Why don’t you just “not contact me”? I think we’d both be happier.
Good luck with your video and blog series. I am not really that interested in it, thanks.
Best Wishes
Andrew
I gotta tell you, given my past experiences with Andrew Johnson, this really took me aback. Since ‘replying’ to my points would be useless (what could he possibly say?), I expected either silence or outrage, especially given my post on his muse (or idol?), Dr. Judy Wood (link in the email). (Given the length, you could go to the link then do a word search for ‘Johnson.’)
I always try to put myself in the other’s place, with certain premises. Like, ‘If I were Andrew Johnson and I was ‘for real’ (not a LH), how would I react to this?’
I mean, look at the accusations I make! I call him an idiot! A government agent (and traitor to all that is right and good)! I parse his nonsense! And what do I get?
‘Good luck with your video and blog series. I am not really that interested in it, thanks.
Best Wishes’
‘Good luck’ and ‘Thanks’ and ‘Best wishes’?
What it looks like is he pretty much got the drift and… just gave up… didn’t even attempt a denial of being a limited hangout, of being one of them.
And it sounds like he’s asking for mercy. (If you disagree with any of my analysis, shoot me an email.)
Well, Andrew, if you’re reading this, Cheer up! I have less than 300 ‘Yup’s archived, and seem to be losing subscribers every time I open my trap (see the above image). If you hang in for a bit I’ll fade into total obscurity.
You’ll be all right!
Allan
Oh, hey, here’s another of my ‘Postcards From the Road’ from a couple years ago.