Addendum: Having some formatting problems. Bear with me. (Imagine the drop down spaces as you read…)
I’m at a Love’s truck stop dealing with tire pressure issues and thought I’d be in touch.
To those who give me added crapola about the fact that your first comment has to be moderated: This is mostly to avoid filling the comment section with Spam; so I spend a lot of my online time ‘moderating’. It ain’t fun, the cyber-world being so chock full of assholes and all, although I do get an occasional chuckle. Like this one:
Comment:
amputee girl dating http://chatpoint-com.holten.site/met-vreemde-praten manti te o online dating
I’ll probably need a new outdrive in May. How about chipping in $3.25 a month?
About half my Inbox is stuff like this, stuff I try to keep off my forum, so you don’t have to put up with it. (As curious — or god forbid, turned on — as someone out there statistically speaking is likely to be, pu-lease don’t click the link. It might somehow come back to haunt us (or you).
Also, now that I have to cut living expenses so Gus and I can afford the boat and possible ‘Great Loop’ trip come May, I calculate that this blog is costing me over $300 a month in various fees and online services. (I just coughed up $180 for a Verizon hotspot so I don’t lose touch.) I don’t like to bring this up but will today: If you’re getting something out of my observations about how the world really works, how about a tiny monthly contribution? $3.25 ain’t what it was when I started this current extravaganza five years ago but it would be much appreciated.
I’m on my way to a lower elevation New Mexico state park to keep the ambient temp the way I like it (60 – 75 F range) and on the road have been listening to some podcasts and such. One outlet that I keep an eye on is the ‘Joe Rogan Experience,’ which I’ve said before is almost certainly a deep state LH/misdirection op. Part of my reason for saying this is Rogan’s meteoric rise in both fame and Net traffic (meaning money). It seems — and I can’t find the link to this stat — that over the past five years Rogan interviews have had over a billion views. Yes, with a ‘B,’ which stat likely makes him the most listened to interviewer on the planet.
Jan Irvin on the left. The Rogan of the past in the middle.
In order to see how this could possibly happen to a guy who was (note the tense) very tight with Jan Irvin, I did some archive surfing. Rogan Poscast # 116 (he’s up to over 1,300 now) is interesting (I found it via a ‘Rogan + Jan Irvin’ YT search). Rogan launches this one with a pitch for how, through his website, you can get a 15% discount on sex toys for men. (My emphasis, to point out his sexist leanings — why no toys for babes? — not to mention the utter sleaze of it). Amidst the verbal jumble, and this is in the same paragraph as the sex toy pitch, you’ll hear Joe assure us that ‘If you have any doubts whatsoever: I’m interested in selling out.’
Mmmm. Also notice that this 2013 ‘cast even now has less than 17,000 views (even after crazed fanboys no doubt went back to hear all of Joe), compared to over eight million on a current one I’ll talk about in a bit. Right. Eight million — and there isn’t a tumbling cat or a moron belly-flopping into a drained pool in sight.
Although I don’t advise you spend more than a few seconds on the 2013 babbling travesty, it is interesting to note not only how far Joe has come but how he’s changed. Catch (right up front) how he belittles Irvin for not watching television plus his utter scorn for anything remotely ‘scholarly’ or even… intelligent. (I bit the bullet for your all’s sakes and listened to the whole two hours of it.) You catch the ‘current’ Joe and you’d think he’s a PhD. candidate somewhere…
[Random Rogan sentence of note: ‘I’ve drunk my own piss eleven times, but I don’t make a habit out of it.’
‘My friend, Jan Irvin’ is Jan’s intro, plus Jan gets a third of the screen; according to Irvin/Rogan, the two had been tight for ‘eight years. You may be thinking ‘ So what?’ or ‘Who’s Jan Irvin?’, but my initial suspicions about Rogan were sparked by my ‘relationship’ with Irvin, best summed up in my Open Letter to Jan Irvin (almost exactly five years ago). As Irvin and I ‘battled’ it out, Irvin, in his various rages, would somehow bring up people who ‘fucked’ him, and would invariably add that they were ‘dirty,’ words to that effect. Aside from Richard Grove (of Tragedyandhope.com), Rogan was on Jan’s ‘dirty’ list. I know: Irvin is unstable, etc. but you can make assumptions about a person from who their friends were and enemies are. Sort of like Sofia Smallstorm referring to (flat earther) David Weiss as ‘a friend of mine.’ I suspect that many gov’t moles get their start through referrals from ‘friends.’[Random Rogan Sentence of note: ‘I know some smart people but Jan actually wrote a book, (holding it up) and it has references and a glossary and shit!’
I don’t expect you all to automatically believe me when I say someone is dirty, and in this case, Rogan’s case, it almost doesn’t matter. But if you don’t believe that a lot if not most of the alt media are part of the PTB agenda, you might be on the wrong website. It’s that obvious to me, and if you look back at previous posts, in many cases I do have the evidence to back up my contention.
Random Rogan Sentence of note: ‘I have no idea who any of those people are.’ This after Irvin spoke about Allen Dulles, John Foster Dulles, Walter Lippman and several other spooks/cultural intelligentsia, and it’s clear Rogan was proud of his ignorance, and scornful of Irvin’s getting so ‘deep.’
But my purpose today is not to out Joe Rogan, only to suggest that assumptions can sometimes be made by the subject matter of his podcasts/videos. What recently got my attention was Rogan’s interview with Commander David Fravor, who is one of the Navy airmen featured in the recent ‘tic tac’ UFO encounters. (This is the one with eight mil views.)
In fact, I would hope you all have noticed the evolving mainstream attitude toward UFOs in general, especially the New York Times piece of about a year ago; a shitload of MS sources jumped right on the wagon in its wake. Commander David Fravor and his ‘Tic Tac’ encounter of 2004 has been on Tucker Carlson, just for example. And they are all suddenly taking UFOs very seriously.
This documentary film, about a half hour and very slick and professional, is worth a look, if you are unfamiliar with the issue. Thing is, it isn’t only the 2004 encounter that’s ‘in the news,’ but a more recent spate of Top Gun witnesses from the East Coast (the Tic Tac encounter was off Mexico/California). I’ll leave you to do your research, since my point is not that UFOs are ‘real’ — to anyone with a modicum of curiosity about HTWRW, this is very, very, old news indeed.Here’s my question to you guys: What’s the real issue here? Take a moment if you have to… while you’re thinking, maybe notice something about the above documentary… notice how it must have been made with the complete cooperation of the Navy?
Yes, that was a big hint.
I’ve watched maybe a score of video interviews with the Navy airmen (pilots and radar people and ground crews) and very quickly noticed that what would have been my first question to the guys is not asked by anyone. 
Okay, okay, enough hints.
Why are you telling us this now?
A closely related question… it’s not even a question but rather an observation… is this: You are under orders to spread the word that UFOs are real, right?
Addendum: Rogan is up front in this piece because I believe he’s often an entré, a sort of hint, as to what’s the next Big Lie or Deception we’re going to have to deal with. See, a few months ago Rogan had a guy named Bob Lazar on his show, and raved about how ‘legit’ Lazar is. Lazar claims to have worked at Area 51 back-engineering alien spacecrafts. Thing is, you watch the show and you sure do not notice how ‘legit’ Lazar is. In fact, I know more about astro-physics than he does.
I hope you all understand the significance of the fact that the above two questions (‘Why now?’ and ‘You’re under orders, right?’) are the crux of the matter of ‘UFOs in the news.’ The crux.
East Coast sightings up the wazoo.
And if you need evidence that Rogan is dirty, you have it right here. How could Rogan not have asked these questions?
And why is the Navy (read: Intelligence Services) cooperating with a documentary film about UFOs outperforming the best aircraft in our arsenal. (Notice the quality of the ‘re-creations’ in the film.)
Addendum: You gotta love the baritone-voiced narrator telling us how these ‘brave and honest airmen have had the courage to come forward.’ Riiiight. As if they are not under orders….
Why is a Navy squadron commander all over the media (MS and alt) saying shit like, ‘We’re not alone’?
Everyone thinks the Big News is that UFOs were sighted by reliable witnesses. Pu-lease….. The Big News and it might be REALLY BIG NEWS, is that these guys are telling us this stuff now.
Addendum: Sorry if you’re tired of this question, but here it is: Why am I the only Net-place where you’ll hear this matter even brought up?
Some the ‘brave and honest Navy airmen’ who have ‘come forward’ to ‘tell you we are not alone.’
Again, UFOs have been making fools out of various high end military aircrafts since WW II, so why the sudden attitude switch from smirk to Gee Whiz?
This is today’s question, kids. I know I can rely on some smart comments below in answer to it.
Allan
There is a really good book on this general subject, titled After Disclosure; When the Government finally Reveals the Truth About Alien Contact. It’s by Richard Dolan, the go-to limited hangout guy when it comes to matters UFO. (As with so many others, his casual support for the Apollo fraud is the giveaway.)
Again, sorry for the sorry-ass formatting. I have no idea why WordPress is fucking with me today.
39 comments for “Addendums and Addendums”