Thought I’d alert you all to a situation with Amazon.com. I recently bought an audio book from them titled The Ghost; The Secret Life of Spymaster James Jesus Angleton, which purported to be the truth behind the spook (head of Counter Intelligence) James Angleton. I was curious to see if they’d deal with his participation in the JFK assassination; I should have known better. When I realized what a travesty the book is, I wrote a one star review, pasted below. Please click the image to the right for Amazon’s reaction to my observations; they rejected it (censored it) although there are no untruths in my review. It’s all on the record. This has happened before, so, being the hilarious optimist that I am, I’ve emailed the complaint department. Anyway, here it is:
Read the customer guidelines and see if I abused any…
Review Title ‘Limited Hangout’
A ‘limited hangout’ is when we’re misled by a little truth, shocking though it may be — when the real truth is much, MUCH more horrendous. So it is with this book.
In scanning the negative reviews I was amused to note that the readers who didn’t like this book felt that Angleton was treated UNFAIRLY, i.e., he was actually a patriot and a great American. Sorry, but any serious student of the JFK assassination will tell you that Angleton was up to his nicotine-stained eyebrows in the plot to kill Kennedy. Although there are many incriminating aspects of Angleton’s behavior re the assassination – none of which are mentioned in this travesty of a book – I’ll sum it up with the matter of Oswald’s supposed trip to Mexico City a month before Dallas, wherein he is said to have met with Soviet and Cuban spooks, and attempted to get a visa for Russia (his ‘escape’ after he would kill JFK). As most researchers know, Oswald was being set up (link to the whole article below):
“The CIA advised that on October 1, 1963, an extremely sensitive source had reported that an individual identified himself as Lee Oswald, who contacted the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City inquiring as to any messages. Special Agents of this Bureau, who have conversed with Oswald in Dallas, Texas, have observed photographs of the individual referred to above, and have listened to a recording of his voice. These special agents are of the opinion that the above-referred-to individual was not Lee Harvey Oswald.”
If you could only read one book on the JFK assassination, this is it.
The paragraph shown above comes from an FBI memo sent to both the White House and the Secret Service on November 23, 1963, the day after President Kennedy’s assassination. It was a follow-up to a phone call at 10:01 AM, in which Director Hoover informed Lyndon Johnson of the same fact. Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of Kennedy held in police custody in Dallas, had been impersonated in phone calls to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City.’ (end quote)
This was Angleton’s handy work and there can be only one motive: Setting up Oswald as the patsy. That the author of The Ghost didn’t know this is impossible; it’s on the record. And it’s proof that it wasn’t just a ‘rogue’ element of CIA behind it. All the higher ups were part of it. Read more of the story here: https://www.history-matters.com/frameup.htm
This book is still another effort by Operation Mockingbird, CIA’s long-standing op to control the media. Anyone wishing to read the real truth should get ‘JFK and the Unspeakable’ by James Douglas and ‘Mary’s Mosiac,’ the latter a heart-wrenching memoir/history by Peter Janney, whose own father (a CIA associate of Angleton) was part of the murder of JFK’s lover, Mary Pinchot Meyer (wife of CIA’s Cord Meyer), who knew the truth about Dallas and had to be silenced.
A unique and heart-wrenching take on the coup of ’63.
These who run the CIA were (and are) monsters; Angleton was possibly the worst of the bunch. This book barely touches on his real sins. (end of review)
Addendum: Anyone interested in a piece of smoking gun evidence of direct, from the bottom up, CIA involvement in the JFK killing should look into this Mexico City/Oswald impersonation issue. Think about it: A month before Dallas, CIA was setting up Oswald as the patsy! For someone who knows the facts, the way this book tap dances around Angleton’s criminal involvement is somehow both disgusting and hilarious.
We of course should not be surprised that Amazon is censoring stuff like my review. The company is high up in the PTB machinery, Jeff Bezos’s phony ‘space program’ being a Spacex-type fraud itself. Living as I do, I use Amazon for much of my buying; I really should get past that, even if it’s inconvenient.
Anyway, I highly recommend the James Douglas and Peter Janney books, the latter being an angle on the assassination that is most illuminating; it’ll knock your socks off.
I looked through my early videos, found one I’d forgotten about. Since it’s relevant to this (somewhat spontaneous) post, I’ll stick it in here. (It’s sort of worth it for Brian Greene’s little comment at the end, wherein the PTB gatekeeper unloads a major truth without knowing it.):
Just read Mary’s Mosaic…holy cow! What an amazing book! I couldn’t put it down. Should I read JFK and the Unspeakable next?
This SpaceX rocket, landing backwards on its tiny “make or break” landing pin head, looks for all the world, like a model rocket filmed lifting off on the Thunder Birds puppet set,- then the film REVERSED! (with some modern film embellishments) , and shown to the gullible tax slave public.
Months ago, I asked the SpaceX fan club how that exploding rocket vaporized into thin air, and it is still crickets chirping & no answer there.
I was supposed to be behind Jethro…….
Appreciate your posts Allan, but would like to add the one
book that “killed it”…….Mike Collins Piper`s ” Final Judgement”
Have Douglass`s book, but this is truly the final word.
It helped get Piper killed, no question !
If you are ever in N.W Montana and need a place to park,
let me know
I concur about Piper…
Allan have you watched the Netflix documentary/miniseries Wormwood? https://www.netflix.com/ch-en/title/80059446
its every way about this:
“we’re misled by a little truth, shocking though it may be — when the real truth is much, MUCH more horrendous”
the CIA made the death of Frank Olsen about LSD (horrifying that they had do admit they were experimenting with LSD unwittingly on gov’t scientists), to avoid the real truth that his death was not a suicide — Olsen knew the gov’t was using chemical weapons in Korea and was likely to expose it
I’ll check it out. I’m very familiar with the Olsen issue; he was thrown out, i.e., defenestrated!
A surprise: I complained to amazon and they accepted my review, even printing my complaint of censorship. Go to The Ghost; Angletonl, etc. and scroll down to the first review. Funny.
Glad Amazon uncensored you.
Yes it’s there but it didn’t take long to get buried by page after page of positive reviews. Amazing how many reviews it got so quickly
not really. just do ‘recent reviews.’
Interestingly Angleton’s name came up in Paul Craig Robert’s blog on the Epstein suicide
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/12/the-epstein-mystery/
The web is aptly named. Every spider is poisonous. Venomous lies are left behind to trap innocent seekers of truth. It feels bad getting stuck buying into hypocrisy.
They all look horrendous and/or weird under the microscope too. Some people call them beautiful…..especially the 5%!.
The internet was called the World Wide Web because it’s topological structure was somewhat analogous to a spider web, where each intersection of the strands represents an address on the internet, and information is passed from address to address allowing information to be sent from any one point to any other point in the web. Even if several strands are broken, information can still find a path, making it difficult to destroy as a communications device (as opposed to phone lines). DARPA set it up between universities and government to provide reliable communications in case of emergencies like nuclear war. Of course now it has morphed into the modern day internet, which is considerably larger and more complex.
Thought your review was very well written. Also dug the youtube video.
You might be interested in an interview that Janney gave on solari.com with Catherine Austin Fitts. It took ten years to get that book completed; really a labor of love.
Amazon? I make it a point to never buy anything from Amazon, ever It’s essentially a US Government run PX for civilians. It hasn’t inconvenienced me in the least, but after all people talk out of their ass, are lazy and say WTF and do it anyway. Angleton was caught by Ben Bradlee going after Mary Meyers diary after her inconvenient death which they pinned on some poor black guy. Angleton is the phenotype, stereotype, clone for the typical upper level spooks of that era, they were all like that. Nobody had a clue what was going on at those levels except “those levels”. They really overplayed their hand with letting ARPA Net morph into the Internet. What a f__king mess we have to clean up.
It hasn’t inconvenienced you in the least? I didn’t know you lived on the road! What a guy!
What does that have to do with it? The point is you diss Amazon , yet roll over and feed the beast. You mean you can’t survive on the road without Amazon? Please explain. A man good with excuses is seldom good for anything else. Be as specific as you are in your “assumptions” about how the world works. And Alan you know I’m a fanboy. So easy to ruffle your feathers.
When I’m in the middle of nowhere and need something expensive, etc. Look how you phrase it and tell me it’s easy to etc.
I agree with Allan that “JFK and the unspeakable” by James Douglass is one great book for anyone interested in the murder of JFK. I will add one book that although not as great as James Douglass’s book is none the less very good. That is “Me and Lee” by Judyth Vary Baker. At one time Judith and I were in communication regularly for several years. So I got a very personal perspective from her. Her story is amazing and she had her life destroyed for telling it. She is quite lucky to be alive. And if anyone reads that book they will be naturally led to the next book that adds so much to the story. And that is “Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Edward Haslam. Oh The things we don’t know, but should!!
The “Ministry of Truth” sees no need for subtle manipulation any longer. The masses are sufficiently lobotomized…chemically, electronically, emotionally etc. Censorship and information control can now “come out of the closet” so to speak. Multi-level mind control has always been present…but now we’re seeing much more of the overt forms.
it told me once: “reviewing this article is restricted due to unusual review activity”. I always focus on negative reviews and read between the lines.
Dear Sir,
Who do you think you are, trying to inject a modicum of truth into the Official Narrative…shame on you sir!!!
Hi Allan, yes the ugly spider tentacles are definitely controlling Amazon – for 1.
I have set up a small monthly lolly payment , to help you fuel up that moving house , and your dinner plate etc….I hope many more of your fans do the same! – Today!
All the Best, Brett.
Thanks, Brett. I don’t bring up the Paypal thing much, but it’s very encouraging when I see a ‘You have received a payment’ in my Inbox, even if they are only $3.25 (gas money).
Do you have any extraordinary evidence that Bezos has an extraordinary device that simulates objects traveling at supersonic speeds that dumbasses think are actually rockets?
Did the guy who just flew over the English channel with a jet engine strapped to his feet and whom also landed backwards ( feet first) also design the holographic tech Musk uses to fake taking customer’s satellites or whatever into space?
Is it possible that Musk and Bezos and the English channel flyer are not humans or mortal aliens but holograms themselves so are not liable to the public or customers for their deceptions?
Where is the money going, if money is involved, if all Musk is doing is a fake fireworks show? What are the companies who conspire with Musk to fake sending their products to space get from this supposed holographic scam? What makes it worth it to them?
Wouldn’t Occam’s razor suggest that you are wrong on this subject but do not have the personality that will back down due to your investment in this subject? Isn’t it looking like folks around the world are following Musk’s lead and are copying, to a degree, Musk’s backwards landing rockets and not copying Musk’s supposed supersonic holographic image processing machine?
Inquiring minds want to know.
I’m going to have to disagree that a human landing on their feet via a hoverboard and a rocket landing backwards on a precise point in the middle of the ocean are completely different things. Apples and oranges. However, I will say that this blog has maybe too much focus on whether these things are holograms. But how easy is it to launch a rocket for public consumption, then make any claims you want with CGI footage of space, backwards landing, etc.
If you were trying to undercut, do a better job. The hoverboard guy is traveling at immensely lesser speeds from immensely lesser height and has his choice of wherever the hell he wants to land.
If there was a “thumbs up” vote button, you would have 2 from me in agreement!.
Dude are you Jethro from the Beverly Hill Billys?
If one guy can build a jet operated, personally operated craft that crashes in the ocean and then on a another attempt lands on land is he using holographic tech or VTVL landing tech? Tell me Jethro!
Not to mention the hoverboard guy is mainly horizontally-propelled motion and flight mechanics, while the rocket is so much faster and so much higher and completely vertical so the mechanics just aren’t comparable at all.
Feels like intentional misdirection.
And I can understand the concept of reusable rockets, just not the laughable precision we see in the SpaceX CGI videos that are supposed to be real footage. If you’re using backwards thrust to decelerate it, why not just deploy a parachute at some point? The idea that they are backwards landing these used rockets on a tiny, tiny point in the ocean doesn’t make any sense. How could they possibly control the descent in a predictable enough way? In the same way I don’t accept the given story for the Apollo lunar orbital rendezvous as plausible. It just strains credulity. Not to say that it’s fundamentally impossible to perform such a feat theoretically…just why would they even attempt such a risky and unpredictable descent method for such expensive rockets? Yeah, let’s launch multi million dollar rockets and try to land them on a tiny spot where even the smallest miss means complete destruction. Even if it were somehow physically possible, you would have to think it would have an incredibly high rate of failure and be an uneconomical way to bring them down, unless your landing target were 5 miles wide on solid ground, not 50 feet wide on the ocean. That’s the laughable part, especially when paired with the laughable CGI footage and propagandist “crowds cheering” videos. If this were real, SpaceX would not be forcing themselves to hit a dead center bullseye or else $100 million down the drain. If it were legitimate, they would be landing these things in a huge open area where they wouldn’t NEED to hit a tiny spot. The hitting of the bullseye is all propaganda. Even if you could hit such a bullseye 1 out of 100 times, why would any profit seeking entity do such a thing? This is proof in and of itself that it’s a sham. But those with eyes to see can see this sham easily, even if they can’t tell you exactly how the sausage was made.
Re how I’m wrong but just can’t admit it: How about you deal with the videos i have taken the trouble to make that show impossible things happening? I don’t recall you having done this even once in all your comments. Explain, for example, how a half million pounds of aluminum/etc. alloy could vaporize in a kerosene explosion. If you don’t do that – deal with the evidence directly – then you are wasting our time.