(As of 5 PM ET) I somehow managed to sit through the Impeachment Hearings and quickly realized it was another misdirection from any semblance of Truth, especially by the Trump defense, which, by harping on what Trump meant in his January 6th speech, avoided mention of the matter of actual importance.
Had I — or anyone who actually wanted to defend Trump — been the head of the defense team, it might have gone something like this…
‘Mister President [of the Senate], a vital issue in the other side’s Articles of Impeachment is the accusation that the president is a liar. This has been repeated over and over in the last couple of weeks (as it has been throughout his administration) by the media and by the Democrats, to the point where, to many Americans, it has become a given.
The president of the United States is a liar, his most important and egregious lie being that the 2020 election was a fraud.
But is he a liar? Was the election a fraud?
[Why were not these questions asked? And answered?]
And let us not forget that a lie is defined as knowingly telling a falsity. If a person believes what he is saying, he is not lying.
Also, the allegation here is that the president’s lie was the cause of the January 6th event at the Capitol.
So whether the alleged lie is in reality a lie is the essence of the case against my client. Isn’t it?
(To assistants) Please set up the video clips, charts, and power points.
[The dems vociferously object to the exposure of evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.]
Further, we all want to know the cause of the so-called insurrection and my client’s position is that the evidence of fraud was the cause of the so-called insurrection.
My client objects to his being called a liar, especially regarding the fraudulence of the election. So we must ask ourselves if the evidence could reasonably be interpreted as proving fraud.
If the election indeed was a fraud, as my client has repeatedly asserted, there is no case for impeachment. My client also asserts that a fraudulent election represents just cause for the alleged insurrection of January 6th, if the event can reasonably be branded as such, which my client denies.
[More objections — by the majority of republicans also — to the public exposure of the evidence since ‘we all know it’s lies!!!’]
Well, let’s find out if the evidence supports that, shall we?'[end hypothetical speech]
What should have followed is several hours of inarguable evidence that the election was a fraud.
Since the above did not happen… in fact, since not a word about the evidence of fraud was uttered by Trump’s ‘team’, we have to assume that Trump’s defense was itself a fraud.
Notice the fireball on the left side of the rig.
The fraudulent election, along with Trump’s reaction to it, was carefully crafted (likely many years ago, when he was first approached about participating in the psyop) and had a single agenda behind it: Further divide the country. Divide it to the point where staged (and possible real) violence would break out, with martial law declared to ‘protect democracy’ and ‘assure the domestic tranquility.’
What follows are excerpted from a 10 minute Google search, after sifting through the usual mainstream media garbage, none of whom actually looked into election fraud…
Around 5 a.m. on Nov. 4, data firm Decision Desk HQ updated the vote count for Michigan, adding 138,339 votes to Biden, but zero to Trump. The statistical impossibility of such a scenario prompted people to speculate that votes were illegally injected into the tally.
‘Speculate’ indeed! This data alone indicates massive fraud, for why would someone go this far in only one precinct in only one state? This sort of technical fraud has to be seen as a small part of a country-wide election-stealing operation.
A reminder: All we need to ask is this: Was there enough evidence of fraud that a reasonable person would suspect fraud? Why was this not brought up by Trump’s elite team of legal geniuses?
The following is from Pennsylvania State Representative Russ Diamond’s web page
…The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States.
…The lawmakers issued the following statement in response to their findings:
…“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”
Just one more…
Bill Binney, heroic NSA whistleblower, tweeted…
I realize that the above pretty much reiterates yesterday’s post but I think the issue of Trump’s involvement in this massive psyop is important enough to warrant a repeat, if only as further proof of alt media (from Alex Jones to Corbett and everyone in between) collusion as well. You can be sure none of them will say what I’ve said here, as obvious as it is. Be careful who you trust.
Blow it up and read it folks. This is one pissed off Dem. But he’s not so much pissed at Trump as by the whole psyop. Good for him.
41 comments for “An Even Bigger Fraud”