The new deal I made with AT&T for Net access has had unintended consequences. Part of it was I get a new iPad with unlimited mainstream TV access (with Showtime as a kicker). I fired the sucker up this morning for the local extended weather forecast but stumbled onto CNN, and before I could figure out what to ‘touch’ to get Wolf Blitzer (a spook-moniker if I ever heard one) out of my face, I found myself interested in the ‘reality programming’ they were blaring:
The congressional hearing to decide if this guy Kavanaugh is fit to be a Supreme Court Judge. Talk about ‘he said, she said’! Anyway, I’m in bear/cougar country, planning to spend the day woods-walking with Gus and writing an essay about cause and effect, which was to be titled ‘Chance & Necessity,’ but wound up doing neither.
It soon became evident that someone was lying. Now don’t laugh. I mean, I know: Politicians in D.C. were talking so of course someone was lying. Thing is, in this case an interesting conundrum presented itself. (I assume you know that Trump’s Supreme Court nod, Kavanaugh, is under fire based on the claim that 36 years ago, in high school, he sexually assaulted a 15 year-old girl.)
Kavanaugh’s total denial of the woman’s testimony was such that, if he’s lying, I was watching a full-blown psychopath in action (which is nothing new in my life). On the other hand, if the woman (plus three others who claim similar behavior on Kavanaugh’s part) is lying, I was then witnessing a full-blown black op in action. And Kavanaugh wasn’t shy in pointing this out. Hey, he even mentioned ‘revenge by the Clintons’ as an aspect of the op (he had been on Ken Starr’s impeachment committee)! It was surprising (and amusing) to hear a potential Supreme Court Judge spout what can only be defined as a ‘conspiracy theory.’
So ‘Chance & Necessity’ got put off. Until tomorrow, all goes well. Meanwhile, use Comments to weigh in on the day’s doings in our nation’s capital, especially if you witnessed a good bit of it and have a strong opinion. But let’s try to back off a bit from the Big Picture of HTWRW and pretend we’re just dealing with a simple case of who is lying, along with whatever obvious and immediate implications you sense.
By the way, I’m interested in What Happens Next in this matter for this reason: As I say, there are only two possible implications to today’s events at the hearing: Either we might very well have a (or another) full-blown psychopath on The Court or the Democrats committed all sorts of felonies to fuck up The Donald. Shouldn’t ‘they’ get to the ‘truth’ here? This itself is an interesting question, no?
Allan
A hint about ‘Chance & Necessity.’ In very general
terms, there are two possible ‘natural causes’ to any given ‘physical event’ (I’m using scare quotes because an analysis depends on the strict definitions of these terms), one being chance, the other necessity.
Since ‘chance,’ by definition implies ‘random causation’ – and given that everything supposedly has a ‘cause’ – we already are on dilemma’s horn.
Necessity, on the other hand, implies a known ‘law of nature’ as the ‘cause.’
Take a coin flip. Heads or tails. Chance, right? With an honest coin, 50-50. But we also know that how the coin lands is governed by the laws of nature, good old Newtonian physics.
So is a coin toss ‘chance’ or ‘necessity’?
In any given cause-and-effect situation, is there a third choice? Yes, IMO, and a possible relevant term is ‘intelligent design.’ See what I mean?
This is a general hint of what I intended to write about today, and it has everything to do with the two books I’m examining, i.e., Dangerous and Who Built the Moon?
If you have something to say about this subject I’m likewise all ears.
To all you folks that made a comment, no one mentioned K’s elaborate calendar notations beginning in high school because that was something his father did. I wonder where he kept the 32 calendars and have them handy to quote the date, time and what he was doing on that particular day. I can’t believe for one minute a man doing this for 32 years. A calendar and a diary rolled into one. I use to keep a record on my activities because I wanted the write a story about me for my daughter although after one year it got to be quite a hassle. A week or so would go by and I didn’t notate an activity and after a while, I just gave up. In my wildest imagination, I can’t begin to believe a MAN would or could do this for as long as K states. He could be the exception or he has obsessive compulsion disorder (OCD) IMO. What I find interesting that no one demanded to see the calendar regarding the so-called date of the sexual event If it did happen you think he would have made some kind of special notation on the day in question. Just a thought on my part. That’s all folks.
Good point. Has anyone asked to see the whole stack of 32 or 36 years of calendars? Just to verify his claim of having done this. I also wonder if chemical analysis could tell if the ‘calendar’ was actually concocted recently.
These are some things a real FBI investigation might do. But keep in mind that if the whole thing is theatre, the FBI would be in on it, they’re being possibly the most corrupt organization on the planet.
2nd to the CIA
It’s gonna be a multi-way tie for first place between the FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS plus all other agencies equivalent the these 3-letter bureaus. It’s true, I saw it on the new live-action Gov’t replay cam that was outsourced to the NFL. The results of the official review by The New York replay-referees ruled it an all around tie, even though it was obvious to all the fans “in-the-know” that it was already a tie even before the game started. Unfortunately, those fans that were not “in-the-know” were confused, baffled, and unwilling to believe the results.
WTF, I your first book Allen you made comment of conspiracy theorist’s as idiots.
Maybe once you dried out you began to wake up.
” Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
Why waste time trying to look back when the major challenges are yet to come.
Earth flat or spherical dribble and the 911 bullshit.
Those that can’t see the conspiracy are the idiots and the truth is hateful to their ego’s.
Since my previous comment is on the moderation list, I highly doubt this is a place to discuss
what takes years to understand.
Got any bankers in the family Allen?
Of course they are ALL trained psychopaths at the Theatre of the Absurd and OF COURSE it´s all by “intelligent design” and OF COURSE that “design” is STRICTLY by the numbers…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=809y91GRtR0&t=67s
(If you don´t run this, at least I´ll know what´s up with you compadre…)
(To ‘Marty McSuperfly’: Well, Compadre, do you now know ‘what’s up’ with me?)
For what it’s worth, I don’t trust the gematria meme any more than I trust… flat earther Marty Leeds, say, who pushes it as well. It has the distinct aroma of misdirection/muddying the waters. But that’s just my opinion.
(Getting cherry-picked words and phrases to ‘match’ numerically is, I suspect, quite easy with an algorithm so designed. By ‘cherry-picked’, I mean, for example, the guy in your video finds that ‘national disgrace’ gematrically matches someone’s name or whatever, right? Well, how many tries with other phrases did it take to come up with that? With a custom algorithm, it would be easy.)
Appreciate the post! Marty Leeds is indeed a shill. Read Letters and Numbers and after the first chapter you will know more than you ever thouht you did now. Zachary K. Hubbard has survived the highest level of scrutiny I have ever imposed on anyone. Cheers! Happy trails!
P.S. Correction: “thought…” Sorry. What I was afraid might “be up with you” is a common American affliction: “FEAR OF THE MATH!” Come on man! You CAN teach an old dog new tricks! I´m living proof! This is dedicated to our mutual disaffection for the Musky One of Mars…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgKKtRJdXzg
It´s also stone cold proof the earth is round! What is 47?
That´s why they invented Marty Leeds and Gary Grindberg!
Here´s my afternoon picks for Stupor Ball today:
Raiders / Seahawks / Chargers / Steelers / Chiefs. PAR-LAY and PAR-TAY!
Well, that´s my monthly comment allotment. Have a nice month!
Interesting interpretation of what constitutes ‘stone cold proof’!
Who the fuck of us really cares what these creatures do or don’t do? Why are we even spending a single second on glorifying these bastards!
Having said that, it’s sometimes entertaining, I admit, to lower oneself back to the programmed unit level we were at before we got to see through the lies. But I’ll also say that I simply can’t stay in that confined paradigm spectrum for more than a few minutes. It’s like picking up a toy that you once played with when you were a 10-year-old kid, and think of how much fun you had back then… the thing is, no matter how hard you try now you can’t achieve that same magic. Even though the toy hasn’t changed at all.
Just saying….
Senshi
I know but thought experiments can be fun, and besides, assuming that every word emanating from ‘them’ is a lie can be lead to incorrect assumptions… like flat earth.
What great ones do the less will prattle of.
— Edward ‘Shake-speare’ de Vere,
Twelfth Night (or What thou wilt), I.ii
Chance and necessity. . . .
It’d be fun to be able to make a coin fall the way I wanted it to . . . the first few times. It was fun learning to walk; once I had it down, though, I quit paying attention: been there, done that, on to something new.
Robert Heinlein once had a character (the wise old man of the story) say something to the effect of, Random chance is not sufficient to explain random chance. Afaik, he didn’t go on to say what he did think was going on.
Newtonian mechanics works for a simple pendulum, say one consisting of a weight on the end of a thin but rigid rod (and a frictionless joint at the top), but if you suspend a second similar rigid-rod pendulum from the bob of the first one, all bets are off: it is not even theoretically possible to predict where either bob will be at any future time. Complex systems are *interesting*.
Hindu theology teaches that existence, the universe, all-that-is, the Ultimate Ground, has three aspects: sat (being — it has existence); chit (awareness — it’s conscious); and ananda (bliss). Hinduism predicates a conscious, intentional Universe. I ‘spect that, to that extent, I qualify as, hm, Hinduist? Hindu-ish?
You might know the Hindu term “maya”. It’s often translated as “illusion” — this whole extant cosmos is “an illusion”. But “maya” also has the meaning of “play” in the theatrical sense — all the world’s a stage. And finally, “maya” also means “play” as in play cards, play house, play with me. And I for one would hate to think that Ultimate Reality is *serious*.
I find the Universe inherently playful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iW0aJwJu1I
(the subtitles don’t quite match the speaking sometimes, but they serve)
Good one, mellyren. Your third paragraph is technically and absolutely correct and has interesting implications. I’m having trouble with ‘Chance & Necessity’ for reasons implied by this aspect of your comment. It might take me a few days to get the words right, if I can do so at all. Meanwhile, have at it here: It appears that you all have left the ‘questionable’ commenters in the dust, probably b/c these subjects are not on their ‘list’ of misdirectional crapola.
(I’ll now take a look at your video.)
By the way, I’m still stunned that it didn’t occur to me that the whole Kavanaugh mess is literally theatre. It’s like I had a two day senior moment.
Theatre — one thing I like about Q is the repeated admonishment, “Enjoy the show.” And I do. Lord, what fools these mortals be!
RE: Kimberlie September 28, 2018 at 2:57 am
I prefaced my above blog “I came across this the other day”….. simply to state it was not my opinion, but rather something I had read.
EVERY SINGLE politician out there who is allowed ‘out there’ (in public or non-public view) is dirty. Kavanaugh is part of the game the PTB are playing.
The PTB control the vertical and the horizontal.
My point is I do not trust ANY politician. The Republicans are in bed with the Demon-crats, and the Independent and Green, et al, are in bed with the Republicans. There is NO party that is not dirty. The game here for us serfs is to choose the lesser of two dirty evils. We are given the choice between two wicked forces…. their EndGame is the same=
Obliterate every last vestige of what made America the Super Power it once was and level the playing field into one mass Third/Fourth World where the peoples (serfs) gleefully obey the PTB’s every dictate.
For those who’ve studied A. Tocqueville and A. Weishaupt, I’ve come to the conclusion (as many of you here have) that the PTB have been planning the ‘World Coup’ well before the 20 century. America was the Enemy of the PTB. The first line of defense in domination is to infiltrate and KNOW your enemy.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
Hi Kim
I would couple this response with the one I wrote at 9/29, 2018 at 1:07 am. (reply to ian)
I think there is an important yet easily overlooked difference that a single alphabetic letter can make when it is capitalized and when it isn’t. I would point out that any political party can have a name that is intended to convey fidelity and comportment with the common meaning of the nominated word. For example, the capitalized I in Independent indicates a sly sort of copyright claim upon the common meaning of independent. The claim is theft. One can think of countless examples of this kind of larceny when we look at what corporations are allowed to use as names. One prominent company that makes computer sound cards is Creative. They may be creative but miss how naming themselves after it is just a huge insult to those who aspire to it’s common meaning. Spectrum, Joy, Gain, Green. The commons of meaning is the gold mine of claim-jumping corporations.
In the same sense then, the Republicans have made a brand name for their corporation by capitalizing the r of the supposed republic that is the nation. democracy has been used likewise. Being that a republic is rule by representation of the citizenry, of what sense does it make that representation should be split in to any number of special categories? Not only is a two party or multi-party system wrong, so is any single party system other then the general population. What is segregable is the many concerning issues that plague us, which means that any discreet issue is not properly solved by inclusion in the omnibus. By discreet I don’t mean context free; environmental pollution is discreet from war spending; abortion on demand is discreet from the mandatory requirement on educational attendance. The context is the general public’s solutions to these problems.
Context is our agreed upon values as well as the arena where the clash of values meet their outcome; it is culture and can include seemingly insignificant minutia like whether to leave a light on for an expected guest, or whether to ask a total stranger how they are doing. Much of it is beyond our conscious awareness. However, culture context falls way short of just being everything. From the taken for granted manners that we expect in public to matters of great pitch and moment, that hierarchy of salience is not written in stone. Democracy is a cheap and ineffective means of obtaining resolution. It is a mere tautology that if the public is stupid they can’t help but vote for stupid things. If they are too stupid to be aware of fallacy and invasion they will continue in the path of destruction. The problem resides in the destruction of the public sphere. People are talking, somewhere, just not around here. Dirty talk and abject vulgarity proves no point as I know you agree. But find the soul who’s talking so and there you have a sign of where the problem truly lies. The rise of vulgarity is concomitant with the rise of tyranny.
Amen Kimberlie, someone has been paying attention.
Your eyes are wide open.
Great Alan Watts video thanks Mellyrn. Wonderful purposelessness!
5 PM West Coast Time: Good bunch of comments! Some stuff brought up that I hadn’t thought of, including the possibility that the whole mess is literally another mind fuck to keep us arguing. In other words, both ‘witnesses’ are actors. I have to admit that I hadn’t thought of that. I’m not saying this is the case but that it hadn’t occurred to me is a revelation. Gracias!
The only truth uttered has been, “This is a circus.”
Divide and conquer! The rule book is Machiavellianism, the Prince.
Order out of Chaos, power and control of the masses.
Whats that? you say…
Those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
The knowledge is understood by those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. It matters not the total-in-depth of who what when where and why. Only that the whole picture is seen and the trumpet is heard.
Machiavellianism indeed! Yes, divide and conquer through infiltration – political manipulation – that’s where order out of chaos leads to ultimate power and control of the masses. The masses are constantly entertained and they’re being led by the nose on what to think, say, do, and who to rat out for not following the group according to the government(s). The people are the enemy to the PTB and the PTB are the enemy to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Limited investigation called for by WH…HUGE victory for dems as T hates this for sure….let’s see if K withdraws his nomination.
Mind fuck indeed!!!! That’s all it is.. don’t adjust your set ‘we have control’ as millions tune in hanging on/dissecting every nauseating, lying filthy word that comes out of their crooked mouths. How can we be here, talk about the things we do and give any credibility at all to the bread and circus’s served up to us every single day? I think the take over of the media is TOTAL and COMPLETE. Not a day has gone by since Trump took office that his voice, his face, his tweets and his endless juvenile language has not dominated the air waves. Is there another definition of TOTAL STATE CONTROL? TOTAL MIND FUCK INDEED!! We’ll be right back after this message for your favorite prescription drugs, oh, and don’t forget SEX SELLS…. I fucking own you!
Sorry for the rant but my brain cells are drowning in a fucking cesspool ‘and I can’t get up’. . . . .
Exactly. Everything that goes viral in the ‘news’ is mindfuckery. It’s designed to ensure people never unite in matters that are fundamentally important to all humanity. Meanwhile, our entire economic system is under corporate control. When is the last time we had a SCOTUS nominee intent on abolishing the Federal Reserve? It won’t happen. But no worries–good ol’ Trump is going to “remake” the Fed, “take control” of the Fed, and all will be well. I heard it on the news.
That’s just one example. This is an interesting video on the history of money, and who controls it. It contains a lot of history we don’t learn in school. http://www.themoneymasters.com/
Exactly on the money. Can you say Ron Paul? JFK was the last who tried.
The Jew knows more than Jew, as in Ashkenazi jew. Why not a Murphy or
Smith or Johnson running the FED? Dream on the Rothchild dynasty is
alive and thriving and you are nothing but a debt slave.
The USA is the police force for the NWO or more correctly the banking cartel.
The IRS is the enforcement for Federal Reserve.
Trump and company is a Goldman Saks Puppet,
Interesting analysis by a body language expert on Ford’s testimony.
https://youtu.be/uGxr1VQ2dPI
POTTER, this was very good. I’ve heard that woman before, she did a good job here.
Take away, “if you act like a little kid, in this case a little girl, your story is much more likely to be believed.”
Of course none of the senators believe any of this or even the media, it’s all BS, goes without saying that it’s all directed to the people. To get us to discuss who is credible, who isn’t etc etc.
The PTB did a pretty good job this time of screwing with our heads.
Democrats and Republicans, and the SCOTUS, are all playing for the same team–the global power structure. Their aim is to create an illusion of choice, keep the people divided with outrage against the other side, and entertain us with bread and circuses.
It’s just part of the circus, IMO. They are all reading their scripts, and therefore all lying. Maybe it doesn’t matter much if the script was based on real events, or is complete fiction.
Completely agrree
The Dems really don’t want this guy. There is like 5 accusers at the last minute.$400,000 go fund me for Ford.
From Zero Hedge, Questions not asked:
“What is Dr. Ford’s relationship with the CIA, and with her father?
The importance of noting the CIA banking connections of Ralph G. Blasey Jr., this report explains, is due to the outbreak of what is now known as the “CIA Bank War”—and whose start of, in 1982, a CIA seized from publication news report (Declassified in Part-Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/05: CIA-RDP90-00965R00150010-7) describes as: “This is Wall Street, the center of the international banking system, a system on the edge of a crisis so severe that the Central Intelligence Agency is preparing drastic measures. Something must be done to avert the breakdown of the Free World’s monetary system.”
Who paid for her lawyer, lie detector test, and other items related to her testimony?
Was she offered a book deal?
What is Dr. Ford’s association with the Soros foundation, directly or indirectly?
What is her role in Stanford’s CIA Internship program?
What is the association with Frederick_T._Melges and specifically, did they collaborate on work involving mind control, memory, and time while at Stanford, or a CIA think tank, or any other time?
What is the explanation that no other witness can testify to verify the statements of what happened that night, combined with the lack of other physical evidence, and even evidence to the contrary? (Such as Brett Kavanaugh’s diary/journal he kept)
What are the political associations of Dr. Ford, specifically are there direct connections to the Democratic party and Hillary Clinton, including but not limited to when Clinton was the Secretary of State ? (For those of you who don’t know, the State Department is the political cover for CIA operations globally.)
This staged, orchestrated, and artificial testimony is no doubt the creation of deep-state actors connected to Soros/Clinton/CIA et. al.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-27/cia-mind-control-work-questions-we-should-be-asking-msm-and-senate
Allen
I have been reading your posts for a while now and I have to say you are very educated and articulate. I find this very refreshing as opposed to the usual BS on the internet.
The news and politician’s as far as I am concerned are all liars, its the lesser of two evils as it has been for my lifetime. The only thing the government does for me is steal my money. And harass me at every level. You cant go anywhere with out somebody with a badge, gun and ticket book. Right down to township government.
When this system implodes as it will if history teaches us anything (for those of us who want to learn and pay attention) It will be very interesting to see who or what comes out on top. I am sorry I kind of ran off your topic, it basically comes down to pick your liar and run with it.
Re: Chance v. Necessity….Free Will V. Destiny? Intelligent design….or random choice that really isn’t so random…interested;)
The main thing about the dodgy judge is he’s a corporate ass licker as his voting record shows, one of the boys, yip a real gem. This means he will be a powerful force, if accepted, in the free internet furore and will likely kill it, putting control back with the providers and censors and MSM, to the disadvantage of free thinking truthers and independents on the net, such as writers and movie makers.
Surely this is the main reason to expose him for what he is, regardless of who is currently lying. The main focus to read about is not whatever is truth behind another old event.
It’s all distraction from The Main Event, like Trump himself.
The main issue is destroying humanity and what the USA once stood for, centuries ago, and it was never represented or even understood by these people.
Try this to be more current
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50326.htm
Just to add to the list of reasons to deplore Judge Kav, I think it’s important to note that he is an active proponent of imperial power in the presidency. Gigablast Kavanaugh and imperial power for plenty on that. Imperial power is a synonym for monarchical tyranny and votes for him are, all boohoos to the contrary, votes for leg-irons. As long as the Judiciary is populated by arrogant believers in the power of contempt of court, the court is contemptible. As long as judges can wield it, the judiciary is just another cog in the Matrix Borg Spectacular Machine. In other words, no matter the guilt or innocents of the judge, the court is contemptible.
Now in the link you posted ian; this is a nice little article by Caitlin Johnstone that may punctuate our decentered topic. Decentered because the necessary context has been subsumed by an unembodied decontextualized impostor. In Guy Debord’s words, “the spectacle originates in the loss of unity of the world, and the gigantic expansion of the modern spectacle expresses the totality of this loss.” There is no center because the ruling principle is too often in flux. Atrocity is one of the last things capable of holding the attention for any useful length of time. All must wait with bated breath to see if they will next be rolled into this ongoing atrocity that is becoming our world, and all the distractions from it, no matter how appealing, will fail.
In Caitlin’s article we see the atrocity that is the war on the people of Yemen. Have we become so inured, that we say ho-hum, what can I do? Inured perhaps to the evidence that US made munitions are being used to bomb another country to hell. No, not inured, for one must willingly look at it, and no self defensive media will dare put it in our face.
The left-right political paradigm is a weapon. If we continue to play in these two parties that two team sport has conditioned us to respect than we won’t see that the ‘same team is just wearing different uniforms’, or the fact that no guiding principle is present when deciding what these contrived instruments of power are to proclaim as virtue.
“In John Steinbeck’s The Pearl, there are jewelry buyers set up around a fishing community which are all owned by the same plutocrat, but they all pretend to be in competition with one another. When the story’s protagonist discovers an enormous and valuable pearl and goes to sell it, they all gather round and individually bid far less than it is worth in order to trick him into giving it away for almost nothing. US politics is pretty much the same; two mainstream parties owned by the same political class, engaged in a staged bidding war for votes to give the illusion of competition.”
Allan, as you are not on the mainstream Cult 45 daily info/disinfo train…Trump and his followers daily speak of Deep State, Conspiracy against them and the USA…etc-even during his campaign…it is one of the battle cries…so it wasn’t so surprising in that context…Mainstream Media uses it as a talking point on their belief that T & Co are absurd.
Being located in Europe, Kavanaugh & co. is far away, and not really of specific interest for me.
I used to define “chance” as either unknown causation (gravity ?), or the effect of an unmeasurable amount of influences (say, the path of an electron, or a lightning bolt). Thus, chance as a limitation by knowledge, or by the senses.
‘Thus, chance as a limitation by knowledge, or by the senses.’
I like. Well put.
When I walk past a TV with the news blaring, especially CNN, I give it the good ol’ middle finger every time. I NOW UNDERSTAND why politicians never get along, make a lot of noise, can’t EVER come to agreements with each other on anything, hype BS stories, ignore and redirect away from anything of importance, strip away our rights, make wars, murder the innocent, steal our money, push Frankenstein GMO’s, vaccines, and chemtrails down our throats, in our veins and into our lungs – because it’s all ‘by design’.
These rotten scumfucks (and those supporting them) are the most disgusting disgrace to humanity all while putting on a nice smiley face as they preach out there assholes.
Politicians do theater. Not getting along, disagreeing, lying, creating distractions, making the tangential point the focus, making idiotic remarks to appeal to constituents and etc. Is theater. You might notice that they always find a way and eventually agree to further enrich the rich and screw the commons. Even as they shirk their responsibilities to vote for war, They always agree to bomb defenseless peoples. And fully support the surveillance police state, the military industrial complex, big pharma, big oil, giant agribusiness and screw the commons. Its baked into the entire corrupt system. Pay to play.
But is it door number one or two?
That 911 fascist creep on the supreme court will be another Roberts or Thomas. They always rule in favor of the state or any Billion dollar corporation over any individual.
I came across this the other day…..
Did anyone happen to hear or see anything like this on CNN?
Kavanaugh vs. Ford
Now things are starting to make sense.
Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he allegedly did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case ruled on by Brett Kavanaugh’s mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001.
During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of
Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case. The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V.
Isn’t it kind of amazing that all the media reports today didn’t mention this little
conflict of interest for Blasey-Ford?
Christine Blasey-Ford motive: Revenge – Kavanaugh’s mother ruled against her
parents in foreclosure case 1996
So a leftist scorned, out for revenge for her parents over a foreclosure 22 years ago is why Blasey-Ford finally came out of the closet. I guess when Brett Kavanaugh was nominated to the DC Appeals court in 2006, it wasn’t time for revenge. Now that he’s up for the Supreme Court, it’s time for Christine Blasey-Ford to avenge her parents. How pathetic.
So let’s see what we’ve learned today from the “mystery women.”
1) She’s a registered Democrat
2) She’s a far left Democrat activist who hates Trump
3) She’s a professor in a Palo Alto University. Palo Alto is the Silicon Valley, home of
big tech and basically no conservatives
4) She’s made several donations to Bernie Sanders, the DNC and ACTBLUE.
5) She’s a bitter old woman, out for revenge because the mother of a candidate nominated for the Supreme Court was the judge against her parents in a Maryland foreclosure case
back in 1996.
This is your modern Democrat party folks and it’s far, far worse than the old democrat party.
Diane Feinstein and her Chinese Spy of 20 years must not have realized that the court case with Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents and Brett Kavanaugh’s mother judge would ever make it out in the open.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-parents/ is this an acceptable fact check site?
No. Snopes is not reliable.
A bit of devil’s advocacy…
Kimberlie’s theory is a bit of a stretch, without details. What was lost? Were the Blasey’s put out on the street? Given that the two families were from the same area, and given that Mom was a judge, it’s not so mind bending that she heard a case involving the other family. So if you’re gonna go this route we need the details.
And wait: A bitter OLD woman? What is she, like 50 or so? Where does that put me on the ‘old’ spectrum? Your point would be stronger without the editorializing — what evidence do we have that she’s ‘bitter’?
It would seem (from you last paragraph) that you’re combining the revenge motive with the black op scenario. Right? So Ms Blasey-Ford was approached by an operative (who knew she was ‘bitter’ about the 22 year old case) and the whole assault story was created from whole cloth. Right? Possible, but a pretty big stretch: Ms Blasey-Ford would be a VERY weak link doncha think? Do you think they’d take such a big risk for so little a reward? I mean exposure of the op would be a HUGE scandal, of Watergate magnitude, wouldn’t it? And how much are they hurting Trump even if it succeeds? With a downside this big, the upside would have to be huge, and unless I’m missing something, I don’t see it.
What I noticed was K’s stuttering and misdirection on the subjects of an FBI investigation and – more than that – how he (his side) obviously don’t want his old buddy (named ‘Judge’!!) anywhere near the hearing.
On his plus side are all the signed letters from women (like going on 100 all totaled) saying he didn’t assault THEM. Someone who does this sort of thing is usually acting under a compulsion (in his case, when drunk, which he often is, apparently). If he did it, there should be a Clinton-esque line of babes coming forward, I would think.
So I dunno who’s lying here. What nobody is saying, though, is that a major string of felonies was committed yesterday at the hearings, by SOMEONE (perjury). Between that and the possibility of having a psychopath on The Court, I’d think they’d want to know…. and the way it looks, they’re voting this afternoon — no investigation to see who lied to the committee and the world. Why am I not surprised?
I just copied and pasted your entire fourth paragraph onto my FB page (and credited you). Just a perfect take on today’s shitshow. Thanks, as always, for the good work.
Good points and I agree. (How did it come out that she flies all over the world?) But Kavanaugh did little better, right?
It came out in the hearing, she was being questioned by a hired sex-abuse counselor lawyer last name Mitchell who asked her directly.
All her recorded trips based on her college bio stating her numerous trips around the world were brought up by this Mitchell lady. Ford then obfuscated and admitted yes, she had flown all her life. So her stating she was “afraid to fly” was a lie (which delayed hearings) (or she was instructed to lie and did so very badly). At any rate she came off very unstable unless of course someone thinks unstable liars are heroes.
Kavanaugh? He was accused of sexual assault of this woman who couldn’t remember anything, from the past, or even two weeks ago (her inability to remember occurred many times in her testimony). He denied the charges against him. If the dems want to destroy somebody they maybe should remember to bring in somebody who isn’t so classically unstable. If he does get destroyed over this thing, the message sent to the country is a dangerous one. Any woman can at any time accuse someone of something without evidence and must be believed.
Allan, couple more points about Kavanaugh—
The wife of Kavanaugh was George W Bush’s personal secretary and was with Cheney during the time of the supposed “attack” on the Pentagon. So she’s connected with 9/11 in some manner.
As for Brett Kavanaugh, he was the judge who helped the Clinton’s cover up the Vince Foster “suicide.” There was a witness who discovered the body of Foster in the park in I think Maryland, wherever, and his eye witness testimony of the position and state of the body of Foster did not comport with how the Clintons and media portrayed it.
This witness was dragged before the courts and his testimony was demolished by turning him into a supposed drunk or homosexual or something like that and the judge who presided over that case was Brett Kavanaugh. So Kavanaugh has connections to the Clintons.
What’s that you were saying about how all these dirty bastards are inter-related. It is absolutely staggering how true that is.
Oh, that’s interesting about Kavanaugh’s Clinton connections. I ran across something recently (now sorry I didn’t save) regarding connections between the Clintons and Blasey-Ford’s lawyer, as well as B-F’s GoFundMe deal. Are the rats eating themselves now?
Very interesting info, Martaine! Do you have citations (links) on this stuff? Assuming that the Kavanaugh/Clinton allegation is factual, we have a great example of how, in the end, and when ‘the system’ is on the line, they all pull together. (The nomination could be seen as a reward for doing some necessary dirty work.)
That Mrs. K was ‘with’ Cheney during 9/11 is another doozy. See if you can dig up the sources, please.
Allan,
Re Mrs Kavanaugh is ASHLEY ESTES Kavanaugh.
From the book, Declassiifying 9/11, by Aidan Monaghan, page 39, we read,
“…however official estimates for Cheney’s PEOC arrival are just after 9:55am… But all official arrival times conflict with the arrival times for the Vice President and Mrs Cheney provided by Mineta, whose account is corroborated in part by President Bush’s personal secretary ASHLEY ESTES and White House photographer David Bohrer.”
For the Kavanaugh/Clinton stuff, that is found in the book The Clintons’ War on Women by Roger Stone and Robert Morrow. (note that Stone is a Republican and Trump supporter).
Concerning witness Patrick Knowlton who found body of Vince Foster in Macy Park Virginia “Knowlton showed up for his grand jury testimony prepared to testify to exactly what he saw or did not see in the parking lot. Starr’s (Ken Starr) prosecutor BRETT KAVANAUGH (who, likes Bates, is now a federal judge) questioned Knowlton before the grand jury. Kavanaugh adopted a hostile demeanor intent on “hazing” or roughing up, disrespecting, and discrediting Knowlton. Kavanaugh asked a series of leading questions in which he attempted to paint Knowlton as a homosexual who was in Fort Marcy Park that day for a hook up. Knowlton erupted in rage at Kavanaugh as the jury laughed at Starr prosecutors…”
Several pages go on about Kavanaugh and his mistreatment of witness Knowlton.
Book goes on to say that “all three men, Starr, Bates and Kavanaugh profited heavily from their “investigation”. Starr went on after being a federal judge in the 1980’s as well as solicitor general of the USA to chancellor and president of Baylor University. Starr joined the legal team of notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.” George W Bush went on to nominate Kavanaugh for a spot on the appeals court in DC.
So from this we see the Bush/Clinton connections in the coverup of death of Vince Foster using Kavanaugh.
I just found this link:
Jul 11, 9:07 AM
An interesting twist on an old tale – Roger Stone
https://newswithviews.com/trump-supreme-court-candidate-brett-kavanaugh-was-up-to-his-waist-in-the-mysterious-vince-foster-death-investigation/
Trump Supreme Court Candidate Brett Kavanaugh Was Up To His Waist In The Mysterious Vince Foster Death Investigation
Excerpts:
Kavanaugh is not only the candidate of Karl Rove and the Bush family, but the mainstream media praise for his potential appointment shows he is a deep state quisling. Even more troubling, is the fact that Kavanaugh who as a Federal Prosecutor intimidated and tampered with witnesses in the Clinton advisor Vince Foster’s mysterious death and the finding of his body at Fort Marcy Park.
Those on the right who say Foster was murdered by the Clintons are wrong. He did indeed committed suicide, having psychologically been driven to it by Hillary. Although Foster killed himself, it was in his old executive office building office that he did so. Hillary admits in her own biography that she feared Foster’s White House office would become a “crime scene” with Federal Investigators having access to all of Clinton’s most confidential records. Foster’s body was rolled in a carpet and the body was taken and dumped in Fort Marcy Park. The FBI toxicology report confirms that Foster was covered head-to-toe with carpet fiber.
A man was driving up the GW Parkway towards home. This unfortunate witness, named Patrick Knowlton, happened by the Park where Foster’s corpse had been transported and staged to look like an on-site suicide.
But when the parkway got congested, pulled into Marcy Park in order to urinate. Knowlton relieves himself behind a bush but upon returning to his car saw two men in a blue automobile with Arkansas license plates. The men were menacing and he left quickly. When he learned on the news that this was the day Clinton’s Presidential aide Vince Foster’s body was found in Fort Marcy Park, Knowlton made the biggest mistake of his life by calling the Parkway police and the FBI and telling them what he did- and did not see. Incredibly, Federal Prosecutor Brett Kavanaugh rather than welcoming this information, undertook a campaign to terrorize, threaten and intimidate Knowlton into changing his story.
Kavanaugh working for Special Counsel Ken Star, browbeat, intimidated and tampered with the testimony of Patrick Knowlton who ultimately filed a compelling lawsuit over this prosecutorial abuse. Knowlton’s mistake, he saw the blue sedan with Arkansas plates in which Vince’s body was delivered but Vince’s car a brown sedan also with Arkansas plates had not yet been delivered. It is interesting that Foster’s car keys were found not in his pocket but thrown yards away from his body. In my book “The Clinton’s War On Women,” I identify the thugs who did Hillary’s dirty work, but it is the bullying tactics that render him unfit for Trump’s appointment to the Supreme Court.
The attack on Knowlton by Kavanaugh was brutal. His unequivocal witness statements to the Park Police investigators suddenly created consistency problems for the cover-up story that Foster had driven himself to the park in his brown vehicle and shot himself there. Knowlton saw a different vehicle, not Foster’s, and vehemently denied that Foster’s brown vehicle had been there when Knowlton first arrived. It could only have arrived sometime later, after Foster was known to already be dead.
Enter Brett Kavanaugh, a junior rising federal prosecutor supposedly tasked to investigate and, if required, prosecute any matters arising out of the larger Whitewater Special Prosecutor investigation, including the Foster death. Kavanaugh accused Knowlton of being on drugs, of being drunk, of being in the park for a homosexual assignation and badgered him relentlessly to remember the color of the car as brown. Knowlton’s phones were tapped and he was put under physical surveillance, all at the direction of would be Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. All to cover up for the Clintons and silence this inconvenient witness, Patrick Knowlton, who would ultimately file an extraordinary lawsuit against the government.
…U.S. Appeals Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh is the ultimate deep state legal mercenary and ascendant judicial errand boy for the deepest of the deep state. Kavanaugh utterly epitomizes and certainly represents the very same Beltway-Bushier-Yale Law network of diabolical manipulators…
All these dirty bastards are inter-related sums it up for me. A world wide pathocracy theatre. Black comedy theatre with the strange facts detailed here(by Martaine) never to see the light in the public mind. The source ( Aidan Monaghan’s book ) overall is propaganda ( Aidan Monaghan is an advocate planes were “electronically hijacked” to hit their respective targets )but these sourced? facts from the book are amazing.
Brett Kavanaugh a corrupt judge involved in coverup of Clinton on Foster murder.
Brett’s wife GW’s private secretary, arrived with, (and confirmed time), Cheney supposedly arrived at PEOC on Sept 11th. It all seems just a multilayered comedic black comedy to mock.
I’m sticking with rats eating each other. Doing a search on “Brett Kavanaugh Vince Foster”, one of the top articles was the WaPo (!!!) complaining (this year) how Kavanaugh has flip-flopped on whether a sitting president should be investigated. In an effort to paint him as inconsistent, the WaPo claimed that Kavanaugh *tried* to get Starr to investigate Clinton regarding allegations that Foster had been murdered — but now, say the WaPo, K says that such an investigation would distract a president from doing his job.
I often don’t care what a news report or scientific article has to say directly; what they use for background color or contrast can be far more illuminating.
Still, it’s theatre — a distraction. Now the question is: distraction *from what*?
Agree, that Monaghan’s book is propaganda is one thing but it is there that the name of Kavanaugh’s wife is mentioned.
I agree, but with so much on the line, they should be investigating this to the hilt, to see who’s lying. There should be enough witnesses to the details to find out who’s telling the whopper. That K’s buddy, ‘Judge’ – THE most direct witness — submitted a statement signed by his lawyer (and the Trump side didn’t subpoena him), then left town (or whatever) sure smells funny.
Who did better? Depends on ones perspective…he could look like that angry privileged white boy who isn’t getting what he wants…or the poor patriot being abused…depends on the delusion each individual wants to live with.
I put my two cents in on your previous post and see your new one just now on this Ford/Kavanaugh thing.
I wrote, if you want to see someone trained in NLP, watch the testimony of Blasey Ford. She’s a class NLP’er. After all, that’s her field, psychology.
She simply could not answer a question without adding multiple layers to the simple yes or no. This is always an indication of lying.
Also, she stated she would not testify to the Senate because of a fear of flying. Yet it came out she flies all over the world. She obfuscated just how it is she can pull off this fear of her’s in order to fly around all over the world.
However, she classically diverted her questioner. She was asked, “why did you say you had a fear of flying and that was why you couldn’t fly out?”
Her answer, “well, I was just hoping they would come to me instead.”
Her questioner never said, “so you told a lie then.”
But that’s precisely what she did.
If you want to point the misdirection (which is a form of lying) finger, K wins the prize, hands down. Whenever asked something iffy, he’d start in on cv irrelevancies. I mean every time.
To reply, AW, I wouldn’t disagree with that either, that Kavanaugh was also misdirecting. Who wins the contest on misdirection is interesting to debate.
Ford can’t bring any evidence.
Kavanaugh people don’t want another FBI investigation on this because they say it’s a delay tactic.
Have we considered that we are in a theatrical shit show and are being played by the PTB masters for whatever reasons they like to jerk us around supplying the cast of characters including the elusive Judge, friend of Kavanaugh’s and possible corroborator who even has the name JUDGE to make it all the more of a mind fuck?