Doctor Cowan’s ‘Pick a Subject,’ Part One

(Note: It’s usual for me to include photos from my travels in my posts, so I’ll do so here; it helps, visually. Also, to my subscribers: I hope you will bear with my re-doing this subject and other subjects in the future. We all greatly respect Doctor Cowan and this was his idea.)

Doctor Cowan,

This is how I fly the flag over my RV rig. Upside down means distress. That we are in distress I think you will agree.

In your New Years Eve podcast you challenged us to ‘Pick a Subject’ about How The World Really Works (HTWRW) and through research become expert enough to debate any mainstream ‘scientist’ or figure. Since I’ve been doing exactly this for about 15 years I’m going to take you up on this.

I’ll start at the ‘beginning,’ with a bit about human origins. Since the whole subject would necessitate a book, plus you’re a busy guy, I’ll bend over to keep this short. On the other hand, ‘the devil being in the details’, I’ll ask you bear with me… 

In your New Years Eve podcast a subscriber to my blog asked you a question based on a past blog post of mine. He asked how/why humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while the other primates have 24. A subject I’ve looked into in great detail.

Speaking of your new kittens and how great pets are, this is my new pup, Bruno.

I was somewhat surprised when you answered that we are not descended from the lower primates; you added that the ‘chromosome count’ is possibly more PTB disinformation. In order to make a very long story a bit shorter I’ll just say that, based on my research, I’m pretty sure that in this case (the number of chromosome pairs), they are correct. They have found the two chromosomes that — via a spot mutation — were fused to bring the human count down to 23. 

Although we’re being gaslit on the history of our species (biological, historical and everything else), this chromosome number issue is almost certainly valid. It’s on deeper issues that they start lying.

Talk about puppy teeth! Bruno and my old mutt Gus (a female) love to romp.

I bring this up because of the implications (of the chromosome number difference based on a mutation), and because you seem interested in the subject. I especially appreciated your reasoning in showing how absurd it is to posit a one-off mutation that spread to the whole species (‘Kansas City to the world’ I think you pointed out); this situation is the same: The chromosome fusing (chromosome numbers one and two) would have to have been a one-off, and should have prevented the individual creature from reproducing, let alone somehow passing on this non-beneficial (for survival/reproduction) mutation to the species as a whole. In fact, the concept is flat absurd.

Yet no one, no biologist, anthropologist, evolutionist/whatever EVER talks about this. It is simply never brought up. (This is also evidence that the count disparity is not a deceit, since it calls into question the mainstream view of human evolutionary history.)

I’ve decorated my rig with photos from my travels. Seven years on the road now.

IMO the number difference can only be reasonably explained via genetic engineering going far back (probably millions of years) in our evolutionary history. 

Genetic engineering by whom?

I’ll get to that but first I have to deal with your specific comment that we did not descend from more primitive primates. Please bear with me while I posit a thought experiment to make my point. (I came up with this years ago and then was semi-horrified to find that Richard Dawkins also came up with it and uses it to make one of his dumb-ass points. I really dislike this guy.)

Imagine a Polaroid photo of one of your parents, dad say; now imagine a photo of your granddad; now your great granddad. (It’s a time traveling camera.) Add a photo of each generation great-dad going back, way back, way way back. You get the idea. Stack them horizontally so you can walk backwards in time and examine what each direct ancestor looked like. 

I wrote a book about this road trip from NY to Panama. I’ll leave links at the bottom.

You know where I’m going with this, so I’ll cut to the chase (avoid details): How, basically, does your ancestral chain change in appearance? A hundred generations back? A thousand? A million?

What does the last (or first, depending on perspective) photo look like?

But here’s where I’m really going: In the biological history of our planet there have been tens of millions of species (including extinctions). There are two and (I think) only two explanations for this:

Some sort of ‘common descent’, i.e., species evolving into other species (but not via random mutation/natural selection).

or

Where I’m camped now in the desert.

They all just appear out of thin air (poof!), a profound and magical version of Beam Me Down, Scotty! They just materialize in the dirt or in the sea! In other words, miracles. Tens of millions of flat out miracles. (Is there another way to put it?) This includes the appearance of Homo Sapiens. (I’ll deal with the genetic engineering in a bit.)

Is there a third possibility? I’m all ears. (At least Darwin had the implied question correct with his title, On the Origin of Species. This is the central question.)

Addendum: This blog post of mine from 2017 details my views on evolution, and reproduces my correspondence with New York Times writer Carl Zimmer plus the I.D. (intelligent design) folks. The failure of everyone to respond at all to my thought experiment, notwithstanding we’d back-and-forthed before, is a good example of how people will fail to deal with uncomfortable questions.

I’m hoping I will not have to add you to this list (notwithstanding your failure to answer my simple question involving Spacebusters and flat earth).  

Last winter, Alamo Lake, AZ.

The question I’m posing to you is regarding the photo thought experiment (what your ancestors looked like), and if there is a third possibility on speciation. (I lean toward ‘some sort of common descent,’ although — based on hard, unimpeachable evidence — I do believe in the ‘higher power’; this will be the subject of a future ‘Pick a Subject’ post.)

In your view is there an ‘Adam & Eve’ in the first photo? This would seem to be the case if you don’t believe we have ‘lower primates’ in our lineage. (If so, are they wearing fig leafs?)

I realize that the chromosome number issue is slightly off-subject, but it is an interesting conundrum, and it does relate to human origins, in the sense that it was likely a lower primate that was ‘monkeyed’ with way back when. I mean, IMO.

Allan

Postscript: Okay, so how do we explain the fusion mutation that led to our difference in chromosome numbers, i.e., the ‘genetic engineering’ that must have been done?

Right. A ‘Higher Power.’ No, not God (too much baggage with that word) and not necessarily ‘god’ with a small ‘g’.

Yes, it could have been ‘aliens,’ as in UFOs and so forth, but since there are also other matters to explain (the ‘fine tuning’ problem, for example), I doubt this will work. As I say, I’ll deal with this subject in a future ‘Pick a Subject’ message (great idea of yours!)

Again, I’m looking forward to your response to the photo thought experiment. And I hope you see fit to use my research in your podcast; you did say you might do this. I mean, is this subject not important enough? Or if I am off-the-wall, how?

#

Link to my In Search of Captain Zero photos.

Link to the book (one of three of mine). It was bought for the movies by Sean Penn (a PTB spook/stooge, btw).

  19 comments for “Doctor Cowan’s ‘Pick a Subject,’ Part One

  1. February 9, 2022 at 11:44 pm
    • Chris
      February 10, 2022 at 12:14 am

      Uhmm, he was clearly talking about preventing fraud, not doing it. That soundbite doesn’t prove anything, or even suggest anything. I think the conspiracy minded viewers were reading into it’s meaning. Absent any evidence that holds up to scrutiny, I wonder how anyone could think Biden cheated, other than their own defective intuition “in their gut.”

  2. February 9, 2022 at 7:52 pm

    The one and only and Amazing Dolores Cannon tells all – I have bought her Convoluted Universe book many years ago.
    Have you listened to her Allan? – https://youtu.be/eFhvfI55zEo
    See what you reckon.

    Allan,Thanks for the brilliant doggie picture collection you posted , they are beautiful creatures & getting on like a house on fire! Lol . They belong together with you without a doubt.

    • February 9, 2022 at 8:00 pm

      …..you are either going to be enthralled, or fall into a deep sleeepzzz listening to her :-D, because she is an amazing and calming speaker, and super knowledgeable.

  3. February 8, 2022 at 9:51 pm

    I’ll put this is a post but some of you have asked for more puppy pictures so here you go:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS1ZiehiChg

    • Todd
      February 9, 2022 at 5:24 pm

      Great pics. Bruno’s blue eyes are amazing. Glad to hear Gus has accepted him too. Youth will invigorate everyone.

  4. ReluctantWarrior
    February 8, 2022 at 8:24 pm

    “What is remarkable is that there are no traces of evolution from simple to sophisticated, and the same is true of mathematics, medicine, astronomy and architecture and of Egypt’s amazingly rich and convoluted religio-mythological system (even the central content of such refined works as the Book of the Dead existed right at the start of the dynastic period). 7 The majority of Egyptologists will not consider the implications of Egypt’s early sophistication. These implications are startling, according to a number of more daring thinkers. John Anthony West, an expert on the early dynastic period, asks: How does a complex civilization spring full-blown into being? Look at a 1905 automobile and compare it to a modern one. There is no mistaking the process of `development’. But in Egypt there are no parallels. Everything is right there at the start. The answer to the mystery is of course obvious but, because it is repellent to the prevailing cast of modern thinking, it is seldom considered. Egyptian civilization was not a `development’, it was a legacy.”
    ― Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth’s Lost Civilization

    • February 8, 2022 at 8:33 pm

      Yes, i agree completely. Are you familiar with Michael Cremo, his book Forbidden Archaeology?

      • ReluctantWarrior
        February 9, 2022 at 1:19 pm

        No, but I will look into it. Sounds like an interesting read. It seems like we live in a society where the truth is forbidden.

    • lamont cranston
      February 9, 2022 at 2:13 am

      How can one explain that Egyptian culture simply descended from a peak into a valley as dynasties progressed? To use the example above, it started with a 2022 Veyron and ended up with a 1905 Ford.

      OH – it has been determined that King Tut’s pelvic structure is female. So, King (Queen?) Tutette?

  5. Dan
    February 8, 2022 at 4:10 pm

    great post and love the photos

  6. Krustysurfer
    February 8, 2022 at 1:30 pm

    Lost book of Enki:
    Biopic of a demigod mission to earth and the exploits of the Annunaki creating a slave race nearly 250,000 years ago by merging homoerectus and Annunaki genes till they created a fertile intelligent homosapien slave race… According to the book There was no evolution, only genetic manipulation and selective breeding.
    Zechariah Sitchin decoded the cuneiform tablets rescued out of Babylon/ Iraq before all the wars started.
    The lost book of Enki reads like a much more detailed version of the book of Genesis.
    That is what I got for you Allen.
    Aloha Timothy

    • February 8, 2022 at 8:35 pm

      Yes I agree in principle, although many say Sitchin wasnt entirely honest in his translations.

    • Chris
      February 9, 2022 at 10:15 pm

      So a cuniform tablet talks about evolution and genetic manipulation. Hogwash.

  7. DSKlausler
    February 8, 2022 at 12:53 pm

    After reading all over the place, over the years, I have come to believe that we are a result of genetic engineering – you have likely read what I have – and much more. You mention that “God” has too much baggage – agreed… but so does “Alien”.

    Why is it so hard to imagine that there are beings vastly more intelligent than we? As much as I hate the state of affairs here, I think that there is little alternative to the case that we are something else’s toy, or experiment, or even [yep] slave – yeah Intelligent Design (with a few trials-and errors mixed in). Call this earth a zoo, or school, playground, or PRISON… whatever you choose, but what I dislike so, is that it seems that I am not in control of my own existence – something is fucking with me – and I don’t mean these local human nitwits. We are being denied the truth of our [human] existence; we are being polluted into drones.

    • February 8, 2022 at 4:34 pm

      It’s certainly possible, yes, and the the Higher Power I speak of you may define as an ‘alien’ anyway. Have you read ‘Who Built the Moon? if not, you would love it.

    • Chris
      February 13, 2022 at 11:16 pm

      ahh, but how far away are those smarty aliens from us, and how long would it take them to reach us with any kind of transportation or even an unmanned (un aliened?) drone probe? How likely is it to have the right kind of mild star, a planet the right distance away, and a strong magnetosphere to protect life from the star’s radiation, as well as water?

Leave a Reply