Gone In An Instant

IMG_1467

The photos are sequences I did two nights ago, which indicate an object that accelerates and is gone in an instant. Read the text then come back to the photos. This one shows how the sky looks with nothing in it. (I just realized I should have left it out…)

I just realized that my ‘allan at banditobooks’ emails are no longer being forwarded to my main account, which means that any emails sent via this blog in the last couple weeks did not get through. I just spent an hour at the other Inbox going over the many comments that needed moderation. So if you commented and didn’t see it, I’m sorry for the delay.

Your lost comment is probably published as of now, but many were from old posts, so if your thoughts are important and relevant, you can redo the comment here, now. Sorry for this but it’s the tech world biting me on the ass again. I burnt a lot of time going back over all those emails, plus it now appears that I will have to check that Inbox every day for blog messages, since I have no idea how to get them forwarded from the Bandito email address. (For personal messages use my acwdownsouth at yahoo address, just to be certain.)

Although the ME is a complex and interesting subject, and may tie directly to other subjects, like the moon numbers, ‘intelligent design,’ and simulation theory, we will probably move on pretty soon. I will be keeping an eye on the archived versions of Ike’s speech for possible ‘future’ changes and will certainly let you know if any show up. It might be interesting if some of you do likewise; changes may not all happen to everyone all at once. Who knows? But be sure to write down (on good old paper) any notes and dates.

IMG_1468

Notice the little light peeking out from over my solar panel? It gets better…

One more time: Anyone who simply wants to repeat that the ME is ‘faulty memory’ or a simple psyop, if you don’t read my stuff on the subject first I may just delete you out of aggravation. (Find my observations via a search of this blog for ‘Mandela’ the way I’ve showed you.)

Hey, maybe ‘aggravation’ is part of the ME! The higher power gets pissed and… no, never mind…

‘Maggie’, who is also over at TheBurningPlatform, posted a comment I find very interesting. Here it is in full:

The Bible stuff! I finally got around to looking at some of it and shared it on TBP to get some feedback.

Something is definitely ongoing, Allan. Yes, I know!

IMG_1470

Keep in mind that this is a 10 second exposure, so the object has moved that far in 10 seconds.

I asked my very devout neighbor what the lamb is going to lie down with and when I proved to her it was Wolves not Lions she was shocked. This is a great way to verify changes. Ask folks stuff like you did, being careful not to ask leading questions. Be subtle.

Every freaking time I go to her house to see if she wants to walk she and her old man are reading their Bibles, so if anyone would know, it would be them. You will also find that some will instantly change the wording in their minds — since ‘the Word of God’ doesn’t change — a la Orwell’s doublethink. What they don’t understand is that the Bible is not the ‘Word of God’; it’s just a fucking book. 

They think it is supernatural. I think it is revision from the beyond, sort of. A distinction without a difference?

Try this… I was a technical editor for a big military industrial complex perched right outside the largest maintenance facility for airplanes in the country. (Tinker OK) I sat with programmers many times who were trying to figure out how to eliminate my job by having algorithms check the copy from writers.

I asked the head programmer (kneepads) how we could change publications already written if there were no editors.

IMG_1471

Keep going. It seems to have turned a bit toward the top of the frame (up).

He told me there is no limitation in the quantum realm so if they could find a way to insert the data (ghost) into the machines, the machines might figure out how to change them in the past. Are you still in touch with this guy? 

Now, he actually had a freaking schematic so I knew they were serious about trying. Do you recall anything about the schematic?

I worked for Boeing, for Northrup Grumman, for ARINC and a couple others you might or might not recognize… they ALL were very interested in how to make changes to data without actually “touching” the books. Wow. Do you have any sort of documents or whatnot indicating this?

That was the way it was explained to me… they wanted to be able to update the technical manuals and correct errors or add data without touching them in real time. As if they didn’t see ‘other uses’!

IMG_1472

Keep in mind each image represents 10 seconds of real time.

Now, me and my co-workers (three staff editors (I was the lead) on site (a dozen writers) but a team in Seattle that could not be matched for grasp of how word processing works). Note: I don’t really get this sentence but I don’t think it’s too important.

So, I thought the guy was just a looney tune egghead discussing theories about time and space because he thought I was cute. Which I was. But, I’m beginning to wonder if they really weren’t trying to figure out a way to send DATA back in time. Sure sounds like it.

So that the pages now have different words leading to different interpretations. That would be the idea, plus screwing with our minds.

Disclaimer: It’s very early in the morning and I may be dreaming this. [end of comment]

IMG_1473

Notice how it’s starting to trail off. This means it’s speeding up: less light reaches the camera.

Maggie is likely referring to quantum computers, a subject that often comes up in discussions of the ME. (Maggie, do you know anything about this subject?) That elements of the PTB are involved (via quantum computers) fits with the nasty, sarcastic, and satanic references in some of the changes. (I’ll try to dispense with the scare quotes around words like ‘new’ and ‘changes’ and so forth). There is little doubt that an intelligence of some sort, and one with a motive, is behind the process, as opposed to a random quantum jumping effect… or whatever…

So the Bible enthusiasts who figure it’s Satan doing the messing with our reality may not be far off.

#

IMG_1474

The remnants you see might have taken a small fraction of a second to go the distance pictured. This is why it’s so faint.

As mentioned, most clear nights I set my still cameras for time lapse, point them at the sky and next morning see if anything interesting happened. Often, something does. Last night my two set ups (my Canon Rebel and a Gopro) covered a bit of the same area and both caught an object that is almost certainly either a result of a secret space program or is from ‘somewhere else’ (scare quotes needed). In numerical order, with the Canon first, give the photos a close look, see what you think. The intervalometer was set for 10 seconds on the Canon and 20 seconds on the Gopro. There is a bit less than a second between successive photos. Picture in you head what this means and what you will get with a series. The length of the Gopro shots are longer since it was twice the exposure time. The line would likely be a round spot of light that streaks within the exposure.

DCIM102GOPROG0011507.JPG

This is the Gopro, set at 20 seconds, so the streak is longer.

What’s interesting and telling, is how the last photo in each sequence sort of tails off, rather than shutting off. Here’s what I think this means: The craft suddenly speeded up and ‘instantly’ disappeared, which is the case in many UFO sightings. You can see in both sequences that the light didn’t get dimmer (who would have a rheostat on an aircraft light anyway?), but rather was gone so fast it left just a little ‘residue’, which was caught in different ways by the two camera sensors.

The color is also interesting, how red it is. This I haven’t seen before. There are no legal navigation lights of that color; from a side view (which we have) you should see green or reddish hues, and maybe white, if a landing light is on. Not orangish.

I’ve caught lights disappearing before, but they don’t leave the tell-tale trails that indicate ultra-high speed. There appears to be no explanation aside from an instantaneous acceleration out of sight, that would result in the effect you see here.

Some strange objects whizzing through our skies, no doubt about that, and it’s a common occurrence. (see my last video on the subject for a different, but likewise strange, effect). I believe this night-sky phenomenon, whatever it is, is related to the Mandela Effect, Simulation Theory, and the moon numbers.

DCIM102GOPROG0011508.JPG

Fewer photos from the Canon since the exposure is longer. This is 20 seconds rather than 10.

Allan

I’m just about out of Water Time DVDs so I can’t send them out any more. If you want to contribute to my well-being, you can still use the DVD sale button, just don’t expect anything back, aside from a personal thank you.

I just got a bill for my internet access (plus two iPads by installment) that came to $255. Given that the deal I made should have meant a $180 bill, I called them and was surprised when the guy said, ‘Too bad if we lied, you still have to pay’ (words to that effect). Have you ever noticed the degree of dishonesty we’re beset with? Is it not distressing? (Then there’s the issue of the sun being overdue for a catastrophic mini-nova event, but somehow that’s easier to handle.)

And get this: I have two iPads because one fell off the table and broke off the headphone jack in the device, which resulted in no sound at all. So I bought another iPad (a couple weeks ago, from AT&T) and guess what? I fell out of my hammock — a truly spectacular head over heals roll as I was sitting down) with the new iPad in my hand. It didn’t strike the ground but I had my thumb between the screen and the cover and boom, the screen is now a spiderweb of cracks. The f-ing thing still works but looks like… I dunno… the screen looks like what you’d see inside my head, most days, synaptically.

DCIM102GOPROG0011509.JPG

Same effect here as in the Canon photos. The light gets faint b/c the object is moving so fast. it disappears in a fraction of a second.

Yeah, a lot of nonsense here at the end but I needed text space/room for all the photos while maintaining visual symmetry.

Anyway, the point of this P.S., if there is one, aside from the space issue, is that I’m spending a lot of money keeping online and connected in various ways. All to make the blog better! So a few bucks would help, if you can afford it.

Okay. Just laid in the photos and there was just enough room to keep my left-right balance in tune…. and so forth. So things aren’t so bad after all.

See if you can explain the photos without invoking instant acceleration. (By what process did the object disappear?)

Last minute, re UFOs: ‘Tim’ sent me this link. I tend to believe the witness; only problem is he’s being interviewed by Steven Greer, who I am certain is a mole, based on his continual claim that Apollo was real (and his uncle helped build the ridiculous LM, the lunar lander). If you are one of those that still buys Apollo, this link is to my radio interview about Apollo 13.

 

 

 

 

  46 comments for “Gone In An Instant

  1. DHR43
    January 21, 2020 at 4:59 pm

    I was at a news forum (member there for about 20 years), and someone had posted Eisenhower’s ‘We must guard…” speech from 1/17/61. It was ‘we must guard…’ as clear and as plain as can be.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY&feature=youtu.be

  2. Todd
    January 10, 2020 at 7:16 pm

    Looks like your CHAOS comment on Amazon is there. Dated Dec.19, 2019. Not sure when it really showed up, but was there when I looked today.

    “Note to Amazon: THIS IS MY THIRD ATTEMPT AT SUBMITTING THIS. Why am I not seeing my review on the book’s page? Or hearing from you?

    I wrote a longer review exposing O’Neill and his book as part of CIA’s Mockingbird operation, i.e., the Agency’s control over the various U.S. media, but Amazon has refused to publish it. It IS very much a review, and I bought the damn book here too. So let’s try this; a bit from near the end of my review…”

    • January 11, 2020 at 12:15 am

      wow. Thanks. The only way I could find it was to search all the 2 star reviews. They have it so the chronological reviews only go back to Jan 1, then they skip to like July. How did you find it?

      • Todd
        January 11, 2020 at 3:16 am

        Similar as you did but searched all stars by most recent – then had to go to their filter and do it again by date, then finally scrow thru a few pages – convoluted.

        On a similar note I see your recent public reviews do not show up on your Amazon profile either. Last one I see is dated Oct. 10, 2019 for a weird entry about your own book.

        https://www.amazon.com/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AFJTI5ASMHULT6ZO6YF6YTIBEISA/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_gw_tr?ie=UTF8

        • January 11, 2020 at 4:54 pm

          Wow. Thanks! I hadn’t noticed before, but most of my book reviews are ‘Hidden by sensitivity filter’. Holy shit. This probably means that I can see them but no one else. What an incredible piece of Orwellian bull shit! Soon as I finish my coffee and take Gus for a walk, I’m on the phone to Amazon. Should be interesting when I start off with ‘Do you know what limited hangout means?’

  3. Todd
    January 10, 2020 at 4:40 pm

    Another ME thought – why now? Why is the bible and other things now being subjected to this phenomena? Since the bible has been around hundreds of years, why didn’t the butchering occur sooner? I mean, if your gonna tease and harass the masses, why not corrupt is sooner than later. Seems to be, again, purposeful in some way.

    • January 11, 2020 at 12:18 am

      It’s possible we are only seeing it now b/c of the Internet, but I don’t believe that. I think it’s really a bad sign that it’s happening now. The phrase ‘end of days’ comes to mind. And the sun is overdue in it’s 12k year cycle for a micro-nova event, which would BE the end of days for almost all of us. So have fun if you can.

      • X
        January 12, 2020 at 10:40 am

        The Sun is exceedingly stable. The ‘micro-nova’ and ‘galactic energy wave’ stories are distractions.

        There is a 12k cycle, and it’s revealed in ice cores and gological strata – commonly known as the glaciation cycle.

        https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=“every+12%2C000+years”

        Origins: Cosmology, Evolution & Creation – Page 127
        “Confirmatory evidence is found in the thicknesses of the individual varve layers. They are thickest every 11.5 years corresponding to the sun spot cycle; every 50 years and every 12,000 years corresponding to the precession of the Earths …”

  4. Andrew
    January 10, 2020 at 7:34 am

    In quite a few readings of your blog over the years I have chuckled while thinking back to the piece in Captain Zero when you high tail it out of the cantina when the fellow who built you a surfboard warns of the forthcoming satanic invasion. Masterful foreshadowing!

  5. Jeremy
    January 10, 2020 at 3:03 am

    Ure at https://urbansurvival.com. has been touching on the changes in bible translations too.

    https://urbansurvival.com/coping-was-the-tower-of-babel-leaning/

    Keep writing.

  6. January 10, 2020 at 2:34 am

    Allan, you could put your book reviews into Amazon with 5 stars, to confuse those dumb control freak mongrels, then (further down your review) let loose with some flaming fire balls out of the Trojan Horse :-D.
    There are some sickening Govt/CIA lovers in Amazon, trying to do damage control around many of those reviews.

  7. January 10, 2020 at 12:16 am

    Still it would be nice to have an Allan Weisbecker glossary of terms, especially acronyms, page. ME = ? I know that’s obvious to regular readers, but I’m not a regular reader, and I’m having a hard time figuring it out. But I WILL resume my monthly payment when I see the link.

    • January 10, 2020 at 1:11 am

      Sorry, I know how that goes when you don’t know the acronym. Absolutely. Some are necessary tho. Like HTWRW for how the world really works. Try to remember that one. ME tho, when the post is about the Mandela Effect, maybe should be obvious, via context. But I will try to do better for newbies and those who just… forget (I know the feeling there, too). What else?

    • J Dos
      January 10, 2020 at 4:14 am

      Hey Brian,

      I’ve been in contact with Allan and am working on this project now. Besides a highly detailed glossary, I’m also working on a complete and comprehensive list of all of his recommended books/blogs/podcasts/researchers, etc. since he rebooted this blog in April of 2014. Initially, I was working with a keyword search and other more detailed search functions, then realized it’s actually easier to catch everything if I simply re-read every post, excluding comments. I’m about 80% complete with my reading. I’ll contact Allan when finished and will attempt to assist him with permanently embedded posts.

  8. January 9, 2020 at 6:29 pm

    Just got a private email question I thought I’d share:

    I just discovered you and your research.
    I read a few of your papers and have seen a view of ours videos.
    The one comparing Mary Poppins to Zapruder make me wonders what is exactly your point.
    By this presentation you seem to discredit Zapruder saying it is a film not the reality. Get I this right?
    On the other side, you seem to say that Kennedy was really assassinated. Get I this also right?
    If both are correct how was Kennedy assassinated, why did they bother to make a film like the Zapruder one and didn’t they show us the real pictures.

    Thanks for your comments

    I am not ‘discrediting’ Zapruder per se, although he was probably working for the PTB when he shot the film (assuming it IS his version). The film has been severely edited. Search YT for the symposium on that; it’s excellent. The spooks had various reasons why they wanted the assassination preserved for all to ‘see.’ A warning and so forth.

    Oh, yes, JFK was really assassinated. See my posts on Miles Mathis for more on this. (Do you know how to word search a website/blog? Use “Mathis” site:http://blog.banditobooks.com Although you maybe can think of a better search word for your question.

  9. frank
    January 9, 2020 at 7:39 am

    > See if you can explain the photos without invoking instant acceleration. (By what process did the object disappear?)
    Perhaps a blinking light, and the object is visible while in sync with the timing of your photos ?
    Just a guess.

    > ‘Maggie’, who is also over at TheBurningPlatform, posted a comment I find very interesting. …
    Aww, c’mon …
    Can anybody prove quantum theory is more then a cloud-castle, born out of singularities of an empirical mathematical model ? It is at least a very helpful tool for sucking up tax money funding to a 8..9 digit extent.

    • January 9, 2020 at 6:06 pm

      I know, I know, but… BUT… how to explain Wheeler’s ‘delayed choice’ version of the double slit experiment? It’s every bit as strange as any ME and is along the same ‘lines’.

      Re the camera-sync theory, no, the camera shutter is open for the whole exposure. It’s not like a film camera that opens and closes. This would be a good theory if I used a film camera. (Ever notice how wagon wheels appear to be going backwards in westerns? That’s the effect you’re talking about.)

      • frank
        January 10, 2020 at 8:50 am

        > Re the camera-sync theory, no, the camera shutter is open for the whole exposure.

        Ok, good to know. I’m just an occasional camera user.
        So, perhaps a plane, and the navigation light gets covered by the wings/fuselage through the change of angle ? Another wild guess.

        > BUT… how to explain Wheeler’s ‘delayed choice’ version of the double slit experiment? It’s every bit as strange as any ME and is along the same ‘lines’.

        Strange indeed. Not that I have The Absolute Explanation, but I’m a bit tainted by MM’s criticism of the quantum theory. And I didn’t even need MM to realize that the associated Big Bang theory is scientism’s equivalent of god and the genesis myth.
        I got the impression that much of publicly visible “science” is just Kabuki, a grab of tax money, and occupational therapy. I suspect real science happens behind closed doors.

  10. Todd
    January 9, 2020 at 5:33 am

    Allan, what time of night or early morning do these interesting events happen? 12am, 1am, 3am, etc..? Anything common among all the sightings?

    • January 9, 2020 at 6:10 pm

      B/c of battery replacement issues they are usually from dark to about midnight. Last night i happened to wake up at 1 AM so I went outside and changed the battery, which is good for a couple hours. I’m editing that batch (about 3 thousand photos I have to change to video) as we speak. So to speak. It’s sort of an adventure every morning when i wake up and process the night’s imagery. ‘You never know what you’re gonna get.’ (Mama didn’t tell me that; i figured it out for myself.)

  11. January 9, 2020 at 3:51 am

    Although this is off-subject, I want to put it on the record before I forget. I just reviewed ‘Legacy of Ashes’ on Amazon; it’s supposed to ‘expose’ the sordid history of the CIA. Here’s the review:

    Over the past few months I’ve purchased from Amazon several books on recent American history and found them all to be limited hangouts, i.e., books that purport to ‘spill the beans’ on aspects of the national security state but instead reveal minor transgressions, while leaving the big news out, hoping readers will think ‘Nothing more to see here!’ This is what I wrote in my Amazon book reviews, except I went into a bit of detail. Interestingly, Amazon has refused to publish them; we’ll see how this one goes. (I am a verified purchaser and broke no guidelines; proof is that Amazon refuses to deal with me at all. They just don’t publish the reviews. There are implications, aren’t there?)

    This book is the worst of all of them, limited hangout-wise. Anyone who knows even a little bit about how the world really works will see this travesty for what it is. I’ll not go into much detail here, since Amazon has seen fit to censor me, but one example is the author’s handling of ‘Lee Oswald”s trip to Mexico City (just before the assassination) – the scare quotes are because Oswald himself never went to Mexico City — it was an impostor, to set him up as the patsy, and this is ON THE RECORD, if you look into it, and it was the CIA (the supposed subject of the book) behind the deceit.

    The CIA assassinated JFK. This was even a verdict in a jury trial, when E. Howard Hunt tried to sue Spotlight magazine for libel. The magazine said he was part of the assassination and he sued. Not only did he lose but the jury stated it was obvious that the CIA killed JFK. Look it up. That this is not even mentioned in a book supposedly exposing the ‘sins’ of the CIA is a perfect example of why I give the book one star. It’s not only a travesty but an insult to our intelligences.

    The other books I reviewed are Chaos; Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the 1960s and Ghost; The Story of CIA Spymaster James Jesus Angleton. These reviews are on my blog at blog spot banditobooks dot com.

    We in a heapa trouble, folks, in terms of the lies we’re told: Even Amazon is part of the deception.

    • Todd
      January 9, 2020 at 5:23 am

      Allan, are you including embedded non-Amazon URL’s into your comments?

      • January 9, 2020 at 6:11 pm

        Sure, why do you ask?

        • Todd
          January 9, 2020 at 9:09 pm

          Amazon doesn’t allow URL’s in any primary comments on their platform if it’s NOT an amazon URL. Re-post your comment there without it. Replies (with non-Amazon URLs) to comments seem to work most times.

          To get around this issue, make “http://” something like “h t t p: / /” to get around their immediate censorship.

          • January 10, 2020 at 1:57 am

            Oh, i thought you meant in my essays. No, I took out urls and besides, they haven’t sent me notice saying i violated guidelines, etc, b/c I did not violate anything. I just reviewed the books and spilled the beans re limited hangout. They dont know what to do, so they just don’t publish them. I’ve just resubmitted three reviews and will call them tomorrow wanting to know what the problem is.

    • January 9, 2020 at 6:14 pm

      ALL the Big IT Companies are! They couldn’t EXIST as Multi-Billion$ Corporations UNLESS they knelt at the throne of the Ruling Families of Earth. Period. Those people and Companies who managed to earn financial success beyond around the $10 million net worth mark (or created revolutionary inventions of course, like water-powered cars and EM energy devices), but refused to buckle under the direct pressure of the Ruling Wealthy Classes (and their Orwellian Agency operatives) to ‘toe the line’ and pay homage to the Ancient Bloodline Families, were either completely bought out…or terminated. Along with every tiny scrap of their documentation. Same with ALL Hollyweird actors and directors and producers. The Global Mafia permitted NO competition, or even the most minimal challenge to its tyrannical dictatorship! Until NOW that is, as they NO LONGER rule this planet, and so are no longer being ‘obeyed’ hehe. We’ve taken Terra-Gaia BACK!! You’ll literally SEE this fact ‘play out’ over the next 6-12 months 🙂 Just saw more proof of it with that lame final attempt at starting WW3 via the DS shills in Iran the other day. There shall be no more of that Old World Order silliness, I guarantee you. Mark my words, Allan. I KNOW about these things. There are REAL revolutions finally happening all over the world now. They shall no longer be ‘put down’, no matter HOW many peaceful protesters are killed. Humanity’s Great Awakening is NOW-HERE. And NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING!! What is the 17th letter of the alphabet folks?? 😉

      • January 9, 2020 at 6:43 pm

        Awesome COOL!!! ….will we all get our money and/or property back that they stole off us!!?… also “they” stole nearly $100,000 off me (and my family) 3 years ago.
        Talking about big companies bowing down on knee pads – or else, I even saw a major music act – U2 (the huge Irish band) sucking up to the machine, about 2 1/2 months ago.
        At the end of their show, they put up an over the top and expensive!, blurb in memory of the “Mosque Shootings” here in NZ.

      • January 9, 2020 at 7:12 pm

        I hope you’re right. If nothing else, it will be interesting to see what happens next.

        • Andrew
          January 10, 2020 at 7:43 am

          Alexander, the important question for all of us is what’s next? If your words are truth what will stop another group of clowns from coming in and setting up shop? #nomoresaviorprograms

    • Lofcaudio
      January 9, 2020 at 7:06 pm

      So what book should I read next?

      I loved Mary’s Mosaic and Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. Anything else worth reading out there?

      • January 9, 2020 at 7:15 pm

        What popped into my head was a book on intelligent design. These guys are mostly all devout Christians, which is a bit distressing since it could color their conclusions and maybe even experimental results, but they are spot on in their debunking of Darwin. Maybe start with Behe’s ‘Darwin’s Black Box’ to get the hang of it.

        • Lofcaudio
          January 9, 2020 at 7:37 pm

          Thanks for the suggestion. I’ve read a number of Behe’s books and others like them from the ID crowd. (I think you would probably consider me a “devout Christian”.) It will be interesting to see what is being taught 100 years from now as to how we have evolved as we make more discoveries with the genome.

          • January 9, 2020 at 8:00 pm

            Have you noticed the changes in the Bible? The lion/wolf switch and many others?

            It now seems to support homosexuality, they have fathers nursing infants, words like ‘pisseth,’ and so forth. Several changes in the Lord’s Prayer, which I still know by heart (and it’s different now).

            What’s your take on this stuff?

          • Lofcaudio
            January 9, 2020 at 8:39 pm

            There are lots of ME triggers for me, including some of the Bible ones:
            *Berenstain Bears
            *Dolly’s braces (or lack thereof) in Moonraker
            *Mister Rogers
            *VW logo
            *Disney (supposedly there was never a graphic that had Tinkerbell zipping around the castle spreading pixie dust…yet lots of people remember something along those lines – including me)
            *Bible: Exodus 24:12; 31:18 (I guess the ten commandments were engraved on stone tables…not stone tablets.)
            *Bible: John 3:16 (If you believe on the only begotten Son, you should not perish. Should not? Hmmm, that’s not very convincing.)

            There are many others which aren’t coming to mind right now, but the ME in general is pretty unsettling.

          • Andrew
            January 10, 2020 at 7:38 am

            The missing Tinkerbell-with-pixie dust is interesting as I remember this as well and just recently saw this motif (tinker spreading the dust) as a lead in to an episode of Once upon a Time so they remember as well!

  12. Charles
    January 9, 2020 at 1:30 am

    One point that is lost on most people is summed up, thusly: Apollo DID land on the moon — only, Neal Armstrong did not. That is to say, “Apollo landing on the moon” is real in some deep, unconscious, archetypal sense. Human beings serve “the gods”, as bees do the queen, whether they know it or not.

    • January 9, 2020 at 2:10 am

      It didn’t look that curtain rod & foil contraption though, did it.
      “Peel back the onion layers of truth” – said Neil Armstrong, about the only true thing said.

      More great photo’s Allan, that UFO light is very interesting indeed, certainly isn’t an earthly aircraft.
      The trouble with your email would explain why I could never find out what that buzzing noise in your van was, after I asked about 3 or 4 times 🙂 ( you were supposed to tell us, but forgot).

      • January 9, 2020 at 3:13 am

        Electric toothbrush.

      • Ea
        January 9, 2020 at 11:37 am

        Brett–‘[there are] breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truth’s protective layers’ (Armstrong in the Clinton White House, as Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacted Jupiter; a month later Joe Cocker, CSN, Country Joe, Bob Zimmerman, John Sebastian and Carlos Santana played in the county next to Sullivan, NY). The idea that there is a plurality of protection does suggest the onion–but must we always go there?

        Charles–how do you get from ‘deep, unconscious, archetypal’ to DID ?

        • Charles
          January 9, 2020 at 11:41 am

          Simply by accepting the reality of the psyche. Consciousness is primary to existence. Materiality if illusory.

          • January 9, 2020 at 6:19 pm

            I believe you are correct about primacy, but when history is manipulated by mortals (if the ME is done via quantum computers or some such), then we have a different ball game, no?

            If a magician makes a rabbit disappear and you don’t see the trick, does that mean it’s real magic?

            If the ME is via a ‘higher power’ of some sort (fiddling with algorithms, say) then you maybe can make that analogy valid. (If this is the case, we in a heapa trouble, folks: Means the higher power is an evil prick, and we are at its mercy.)

          • Charles
            January 9, 2020 at 9:15 pm

            That’s a logical conclusion, Allan. In fact, Jason Jorjani makes exactly that point with respect to aliens and the cattle mutilation phenomena. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeqO7ZdH-Q0

          • January 10, 2020 at 2:44 am

            Charles: Very interesting interview with Jason Jorjani. Thanks. Here it is again:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeqO7ZdH-Q0

    • January 9, 2020 at 6:13 pm

      Ah, interesting, but Orwell (and i disagree). If what you say were true, history rewriting would be a valid means of control. In fact, the ME is, IS, history rewriting, so you can see why it would be so attractive to the bastids.

Leave a Reply