An update on the ‘vanishment’ of Peter Beard…
‘When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.’ A. Conan Doyle (from ‘Sign of the Four’)
As mentioned in an addendum to my last post, a surf buddy of mine at Montauk, ‘Fireman Dave’ — a.k.a. ‘Super Dave,’ there are too many ‘Daves’ at the East End, hence the descriptive moniker, Dave being a retired NYC fireman — found what appears to be Peter’s remains. (‘The family’ has verified that it’s Peter.)
The media info that P.B. was found on the Airbase was way off, as were other details. (Thanks to Dave for this image)
Dave is not talking to the media but was cool enough to give me an hour on the phone. He also sent me a Google Earth image with the location of the spot in relation to Peter’s house: note the two bluish dots, the house being closer to the ocean, the distance between them about two-thirds of a mile.
Dave launched his own search after the formal one (with dozens of cops, helicopters, dogs, etc.) gave up; he found Peter on the second day, Sunday the 19th, based on his bow-hunting knowledge of the area, as he outright predicted he would. He was surprised that Peter’s body was in such good shape — his skin was not discolored and no animals had gotten to him; this supposedly after 19 days exposed to the elements (cool but not cold weather).
This got my attention, as I was interested in the possibility that — like ex-CIA chief William Colby — Peter was snatched, interrogated, and then put where he would eventually be found, the scene made to look like he had indeed ‘wandered off,’ got disoriented and died of exposure. Key here is time of death; with Colby, who had been missing for eight days, time of death did not jibe with the amount of time he was missing.
When I suggested to Dave that the same might have happened with Peter, he replied that he wasn’t into ‘conspiracies.’ Being used to this sort of thing from my Montauk friends, but also with the knowledge that if anyone could properly analyze the forensics of the matter, Dave could, with his experience not only as a woodsman but as a fireman who had been at the scenes of many violent crimes, or possible crimes… given this, I took the patient, rhetorical route and asked if people ever got murdered… after a brief silence I asked if he thought Jeffrey Epstein had really killed himself. More silence. I’m hoping that the lack of rejoinders means he was at least thinking about it.
Last night, the streak just over the rig is a meteor trail. Tonight is the peak of the Lyrid Shower. You might give it a look.
This was yesterday and as Dave was planning to go back to the scene and give it a meticulous looking at, I extracted his assurance that he would keep in the back of his mind the possibility of foul play. I suggested he look for anything out of the ordinary, no matter how subtle. If Peter was offed by elements of the PTB, they might have left a ‘calling card,’ i.e., a message to others of their kind what was at work with the disappearance/death of Peter Hill Beard.
The secret societies behind those that run the world are very much into the occult. (Don’t believe me, look it up. Maybe start here, and keep in mind that these fuckers run the planet.)
I also asked Dave what he knew about an upcoming autopsy. He had heard the name of a Suffolk County coroner, but isn’t sure if she had yet examined the body. I suggested that a big red flag would be the importation of a coroner from… anywhere else, especially D.C. All one need do is reflect back on the faux-autopsies of assassination victims like JFK or his brother (and so many others) to know what I’m talking about. So we’ll see.
Close up of the image below when I searched ‘NZ shooting images.’
Dave surmised that Peter had tripped, fallen, and had a heart attack. I was still thinking about the relatively pristine condition of the body after almost three weeks and the fact that Dave himself said that it would take ‘a Sherman tank’ to plow through the thick bramble to where Peter lay.
When I suggested that the impenetrable bush and distance from his house was suspicious, given Peter’s age, mental condition, and so forth, Dave reminded me of Peter’s wilderness exploits, adding how tough he was. Well… but still, I was thinking, you can’t have the Sherman tank image and an 82 year-old somehow plowing through impenetrable bramble for two-thirds of a mile… and how could it be that the next day bloodhounds could not find a scent leading away from the cottage grounds?
Addendum: After another night’s sleep on the matter, the detail that still nags is that Peter was found in his stocking feet. I try to picture P.B. stumbling through the woods and somehow losing both lace-tied shoes… the one Dave found was 150 yards from the body, a long way… Being an outdoorsman with his experience… ‘mentally challenged’ or not… his shoes would be the last thing Peter’d give up.
What makes this image from the Boston bombing newsworthy?
…. But… but speaking of shoes and calling cards, a detail that I’d left out just came back to me in a rush of… either insight or irrelevancy (does ‘rush of irrelevancy’ make sense?)… Dave told me that some distance from the body he’d come across one of Peter’s sneakers (verified so by Najma)… the laces were still tied, he said. The other shoe was nowhere to be seen. Poof.
A lone shoe. Does that sound familiar? Here’s a quote from my post from March 2019:
When I searched for ‘NZ Christchurch shooting’, the first image that came up (on the left) is of a lone shoe. Why?
My other thought today is from what little looking I’ve done into the New Zealand shootings. As I say in a comment, it so far has all the tells of a flat out hoax, i.e., no real crime scene photos (plus photos that look fake), a lack of verifiable details, interviews with unemotional ‘victims’ (shades of Sandy Hook), the immediate anti-gun rhetoric, plus the ‘shoe’ photo. The latter may sound nuts but if you look back at past hoaxed (or false flag) violent events, you’ll find most of them include a ‘lone shoe’ in the media imagery. Just a single shoe (or shoes) lying on the street or wherever. And the classic ‘revelation of the method’ film, Wag the Dog, outright told us about the shoe imagery. [my emphasis here]
I just left a message on Dave’s phone, alerting him to the possible shoe connection. (Which may result in my never hearing from him again, but so be it…)
If Peter’s other sneaker is never found… this would be very… odd…
Why would this image of sneakers at the Charlie Hebdo shooting in Paris make the UPI photo cut?
In this scene from Wag the Dog, Robert DeNiro and Dustin Hoffman plant ‘symbolic’ old shoes to get the media revved up about the imaginary war they’re creating.
This article on false flag ops mentions the ‘calling card’ use of shoe imagery.
A screen grab from Wag the Dog, a classic example of ‘revelation of the method.’
Goddammit, how do you lose a shoe… both shoes… and leave it behind with the laces tied, even if you’re stumbling through the woods? Especially if you’re stumbling through the woods! Possible, yes, but not to be expected. I’m hoping Dave will search the area and analyze any anomalies with an open mind. And again, if the other sneaker never turns up, we’ll need an explanation…
I may of course be completely wrong about foul play and/or who did it, but someone has to think along these lines, if only for the sake of justice, and the memory of my friend… our friend… the loss of an exquisitely unique human like P.B. is a loss to us all.
Allan
One more time…
I was almost not going to mention this but since it’s out there on so many social media: There have been rumors connecting Peter with Jeffrey Epstein, that vile bastard — one even claiming Peter was Epstein’s ‘official photographer’ — with none of them including any actual evidence, documented or even just ‘witnesses.’ I suspect these people are trying to hang their name somehow on the ‘Beard story’, no matter how disgusting the excuse.
Beard’s name is not on any published flight logs of Epstein’s private jet; with all the elites mentioned in the press as having flown ‘The Lolita Express,’ Beard is conspicuous in his absence.
So I hope this garbage will be ignored by everyone, but especially by readers of this blog. Peter was a lot of things but flaming hypocrite he was not: Given his very vocal disgust at humanity’s disregard for the health of our planet, I cannot picture him committing the ultimate sin against its children.
Addendum: Just to be clear, the two elements I’m most interested in are the missing sneaker and the autopsy, especially who performs it.
Hi Allan,
Not sure this is on time or even relevant to this, but for some time I have been thinking about your sky searches and the lights flying around you. Bear with me for a minute, I will connect to your friend Peter, but in a roundabout way which may be illuminating, interesting or just plain stupid, only you can judge.
I began thinking about a connection with your lights and the coronavirus madness and started to wonder if there was a connection between the lights, the virus and the pawers that shouldn’t be. At that point you were, literally, the only human on Earth looking up rather than down all the time.
Then just a few minutes ago I received this link to an article about the Chinese space probe to Mars. Part of this said “In 1989, an electrical contractor, Al Bielek, came forward to allege that he and his brother, Duncan Cameron, were taken to Mars through a jump room or teleportation device located at Montauk, Long Island, New York” The hairs on the back of my neck just stood out. The link to the article is:
https://www.exopolitics.org/will-china-mission-to-mars-discover-breakaway-german-colony/
I really do not know what to make of all this, but I hope that you can possibly either shed some light on it or at least tell me I am barking up the wrong tree.
A long time very grateful but till now a silent reader of your posts
Hi Allan,
First, sorry for the loss of your friend. All losses suck, but I do understand that extra angst that comes when a creative, living-life-with-gusto type is taken from us. I hope you can find the answers you seek.
Second..( I’ll apologize now…sorry about the size of this rabbit hole and the time it may consume if you haven’t run across it before. It’s deep. )
Are you familiar with a guy named David Paulides and his “Missing 411” books? He is, IMO, a damn good researcher. He sticks with facts and don’t go deep into wu-wu speculating, even though most all his reports have hard evidence that does not fit with what most people call ‘reality’. The wikipeidea page about him does its best to paint him in that lovely shity shade i call ‘cracked-nutter brown’…but go figure, as a wiki dissing (or approval) is almost always signaling the opposite.
Your friends case has a couple of the hallmarks he keeps running into…like,
Turning up later in an area that was previously searched repeatedly.
Near water.
Bodies not being as decomposed as they should be for the amount of time they were missing and presumed dead.
Removed but still tied shoes…(many of Dave’s cases also have missing or removed pants, socks, tied and untied shoes, etc.. check this vid, the whole thing is well worth watching, but go to minute 34 for the shoe part https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dji6EekRz0w )
Here is his YT chan https://www.youtube.com/user/canammissingproject/videos
Here’s an ‘overview’ kind of article about him…
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/missing-person-cases-neve_b_3984127
Best of luck on finding out what really happened. I know i don’t have to say it, but be careful what you poke with that ‘curiosity stick’.
PS; Seems your doing better with the troll control…thank you for that.
Regards, Guitardave.
Thanks for your — and everyone’s — thoughtfulness, which reminds me of the lack of it from the people who actually knew Peter. I’m in the midst of a post on that subject.
Forgot to mention that I’m very familiar with Paulides’s work. I don’t THINK it’s relevant here. I could very well be wrong.
Allan,
This is your next movie script!
Let’s not forget the Missing 411 books/movies which describe the people who disappear in wild places, forests and National Parks. They are found always missing their shoes!
As an elder law attorney, I have more experience than I would like assisting people who suffer from Alzheimer’s and dementia. With the details that have been shared about PB’s disappearance and demise, I do have a few thoughts.
(1) People who suffer from dementia usually have a caregiver of sorts who checks up on them on a frequent basis. Did PB have someone like this? Is that how it was discovered that he had gone missing? Had he ever wandered off before?
(2) People with dementia get very upset (even hostile) when they are put in uncomfortable, disorienting places. That’s when someone is most likely to “wander off.” For example, most wandering off and getting lost occurs from public places, a child’s home, or from health care facilities (nursing home, assisted living, etc.). These patients wander off because they usually are trying to get back home….to the place they remember being comfortable and not confused. (For people in advanced stages of cognitive impairment, that could mean wandering off from their current home to try and find a previous home or even the house they grew up in.) So…if PB was at his own house and he has lived there for a while, it’s not very likely he would wander off since that would be a place where he some degree of comfort. Still possible, just not as likely.
I appreciate your thoughts and expertise.
We don’t know the extent of Peter’s… dementia… but what’s your view of him somehow losing his sneakers, leaving one behind (laces tied)? To lose both, he would have had to take them off. Can you picture this?
Can you picture him making it two thirds of a mile through ultra thick bush?
Do you think this was foul play?
Allan, it would be pure speculation for me to have an opinion on those items (shoes and terrain) as there is just not enough information to say with any certainty. It is certainly an interesting case regarding what appeared to be a very interesting man. I am sorry for your loss.
AC……Thanks for your very interesting comments. The obvious solution is a helicopter.
Yes, I’d thought of that. Maybe one of their silent ones. Treetop level and toss him out. If so, there might be postmortem evidence of the fall. This would explain no visible trail that Peter had made; I’m hoping Dave looks for that, with his tracking experience. In fact, I think I’ll remind him.
Noting so crude as “dropping him out” AC. Very simple to lower the body with an “assistant” on a cable to make sure there was no damage and the body was placed “correctly” . This would take no more than a few seconds and the ‘chopper would be gone. There are so few homes in the area that the “passing sound” of a distant helicopter would raise no suspicions….especially at such a later date. The autopsy , if done properly, will determine true time of death.
Good points.
For the helicopter trick, see ‘Playback’, Ray Chandler’s last (and weakest Marlowe) novel (1958). He set it in La Jolla, a year or so after the events of ‘the Long Goodbye’ (i.e. ’52), though it had originally been conceived as a screenplay set in Vancouver, with a Mountie as protagonist.
On the other hand, forget Chandler and just think of all the ‘UFO’ snatchings, and footprint-free cattle mutilations.
I think the dogs would have smelled something if he had been trying to get through brambles; wouldn’t he leave more scent that way? So if the body was planted after the formal search was ended, I also believe they thought he wouldn’t be found for months. The “too fresh” issue is a big one. Also, you don’t have to bring in an outside coroner if the local one is willing to “play ball,” so no matter what the conclusion it will be suspect to me.
Yes, good point. Smashing through thick bush would certainly leave a strong scent trail. Re the coroner, I sort of agree, but asking an official to fake a cause or time of death can be very iffy. It’s like admitting complicity in murder…. Depends on a few things…
If Peter Beard actually was a photographer for Jeffrey Epstein (in some capacity — whether or not he was involved in Epstein’s nefarious deeds) then Beard might have had key info or incriminating photos, and then there would definitely be a motive for a Deep State actor to have him killed.
Point being there is no evidence that P.B. ever had anything to do with Epstein. Absent evidence, there is no point in this sort of speculation.
It’s like the moon landing in that there is compelling evidence for both sides and motive is always an important factor in any crime. Even the psycho-sociopathic Luciferians who run our planet have motives for their looney murders, ritualistic sacrificial and otherwise.
What motive is there to murder someone of his age with a deteriorating mind? The condition of the body is unusual, but not at all impossible, and could simply indicate, as could a missing shoe, that it took him a long time to actually die in the woods after becoming disoriented which is super easy in dense woods, and that, perhaps, he wanted to die in the woods given a declining mind. Some people want to suicide but won’t and prefer to starve or otherwise decline to death, which is a more spiritually skillful way to die.
Despite the limited information there are some things that argue against a ritual murder, and, thus, unless there’s a good motive, the chances are it’s a natural death given his age and deteriorating mind. There’s no report of bodily trauma from your friend, and the remoteness of location of the body is not typical of ritual murder which is very public because it’s for public consumption. The autopsy is the most critical aspect of drawing any conclusion and corroborating any other clues, of which your friend should be documenting.
The more I learn from exceptional researchers like Dark Journalist, In Pursuit Of Truth, and Weekend Warrior about the real history of this planet, who, and what runs it, and the absolute pathological lunacy of the Luciferian elite, the more I come to realize that had the Clinton Crime Family stolen the election we’d probably all be either dead or in slave camps. I know some of the Kosher Nostra scum, like Penny Pritzker, who took a CIA mind-numbingly dumb asset who is a closeted homosexual pedovore married to a transgender man, and literally created a story to make him president. The Kosher Nostra trash in Chicago that did this have family ties to JFK’s murder as well as so brilliantly researched by Peter Dale Scott.
Dennis….your three key sentences on Obama’s origin and life require a well-researched book so we, the American public, can truly understand how we were duped and swindled. Thanks.
My brother met with Obunghole when he was stinking up the Illinois General Assembly, doing not one thing, just as he did not in the U.S. Senate. It was on an issue of conflict between two really saavy groups of black folks that wanted my brother’s help mediating and they set up a meeting with Obunghole who was a rising star, who never actually did a single thing to organize a single community. Nothing you know about Obunghole is truth. I’ll never forget my brother saying Obunghole is a mind-numbingly dumb, phony, narcissist who won’t do a single thing for these black folks. He didn’t and he didn’t do one single thing to help poor people as president. Pres. Trump did more in one day to help poor folks than Obunghole has done in his life of crime. Obunghole is a hard core, dumb, thug. Rich Daley told me he couldn’t get Obunghole to help him do anything positive for Chicago. Obunghole should hang at GITMO ASAP.
I personally think the whole Peter Beard death has suspicious circumstances attached to it. I think the evidence of him being carried and laid down when already dead is highly probable .
If he went outside its highly improbable that one shoe especially with laces tied would end up apart from the body, either the corpse was dragged amongst the brambles and the shoe snagging and ripping off . But one thing i learnt from the death of Paul McCartney was the fact that he was pictured walking in a line with the other Beatles but wearing no shoes which in the occult symbolises a corpse. Also in Freemasonry one shoe has another meaning which relates to the initiation of a Brother Mason, where in the ceremony the person is blindfolded and has his left trouser leg rolled up to the knee and the left shoe removed. All in all i smell a rat. Just sayin j
Yes, I looked into the ‘barefoot’ symbology and freemasonry and consider the stocking feet condition of the body to be a possible ‘tell’, maybe THE tell. I’m hoping for more info from Dave, but his seeming refusal to even consider foul play may go against us.
If the “Elites”, of which Peter was a member, engage in murderous skullduggery and manipulative agendas all the time, and he himself was a victim of such foul, occult play, do you really think any of them are going to be ACTIVELY ENGAGED in your quest for TRUTH on this matter?
In other words, if the lies surrounding the deaths of JFK, RFK, 9/11, Natalie Wood, Sharon Tate etc are still prevailing to this day, what chance do you truly think that your questions about Peter Beard will be given serious consideration? To PUBLICLY do so would be to invite the same kind of ending that you suspect Peter may have experienced.
The mask wearing zombies trolling around the world today should be a clear indicator of the deeply brainwashed and dis-empowered state of humanity at-large. With yet another great robbery and humiliation happening to the human world at point-blank, in your face, range, the chance for any clarity, let alone JUSTICE in your truth quest is not very good at all, to say the least.
But watching you sleuth and suss the mystery is an entertaining read. Good work, Captain!
Very fishy, indeed: 1) No discoloration of the body after 19 days??? 2) No signs of wildlife feeding on the body; 3) Search dogs unable to pick up a scent? ( Search dogs have phenomenal olfactory sensibilities…parts per million and some much much more refined.) 4) Trackers unable to spot any sign of a path through the brambles?
Give me a break…
Even if they find the other sneaker, that Peter was shoeless (‘barefoot’) is still significant, given the circumstances. Being shoeless is seen as a symbolic condition, especially with occult-believers. Even Wiki says…
‘While the standard form of appearance commonly includes footwear as a standard feature, the imagery or bare feet is often used to display submission, subjugation or dependence, in certain contexts also being disarmed or disempowered.’
As I say, a calling card.
This doesn’t feel right at all. I wish I were back there.
Thanks Allan. Still so many questions, –
Was Peter found lying on his back or face down? , ie was his body in a “natural” position??
Had Peter busted his own track in through those brambles, ie an obvious “new path” made by him trying to get away & escape from someone? (from that ‘Old Montauk Hwy’?).
How did Dave get to find him in that huge labyrinth of brambles & scrub?
And did Dave find a route or path?, or did he really have to work to make a path?
And yes, most of the ‘conspiracies’ in the world have turned out to be more than true.
I don’t believe for a second, Peter went for a wonder like that, and had a heart attack.
Dave told me some details about the body that he asked I keep private but I can tell you that there is no smoking gun, so far.
Dave found him because he’s a serious outdoorsman and knows the territory like his back yard (which it sort of is). Plus he put time and thought into his search.
The state that the body was in when found is the biggest clue here (and I’m surprised that Dave wasnt blown away by it).
If someone planted the body after the initial search (in an inaccessible area, no less), the expectation was that the body wouldnt likely be discovered until months from now, and the body would then be appropriately decomposed or ravaged.
The single shoe is eerie, and potentially symbolic, as you point out.
Its difficult to imagine a scenario where the death scene described above, would happen organically.
I agree. Ask Dave what a deer he hit on November 1 might look and smell like come the 19th.
I pretty much asked him the same and answered that it rarely got into the 60s during that time period. I know: he’d more or less made my point for me!
The above (time of death) is why I’m so interested in the autopsy, and who performs it.
I’m fortunate, though, to have Dave on the scene the way he is. Say what you will about his… ‘conspiracy’ views, but he’s smart and honest and gave me his word he’d stay alert. The thoughts I put in his mind may lead to him coming around, at least to what is POSSIBLE.
yes, I’m suspicious. Dave won’t hear of it – like most East Enders he’s not into ‘conspiracies’ and so forth — but I believe he will do his best to find any other clues.
yep , it’s been cold here , not really into the 50s yet , I might have to peak around in there , ticks are starting to get active though… I don’t see Beard as being much of a key to anything , just a photographer who liked to party …. and had good tastes ? Hope you are staying well and still have 30 days of supplies .
Yes, but you would have said the same about Peter Matthiessen and he was a spook for half a century. Ever see the movie Confessions of a Dangerous Mind? Wildly exaggerated, no doubt, but the point is who the intel services recruit and why.
Come to think of it, your point here…
‘the expectation was that the body wouldnt likely be discovered until months from now’
…is a good one. This may have been their mistake, and why the autopsy is so important: If they were thinking it would be months before the body was found, they wouldn’t have worried about the anomaly of the body’s condition (too ‘fresh’, as it seems to be now)… (Say, they planted the body after the formal search.) Now it would be a BIG problem… See what I mean? Yeah, the autopsy is key.
Exactly.
Dave may have messed up the timeline by finding what was intended to be a carefully hidden corpse.
Dave is in a potentially precarious position, being the only first hand witness to the body at the time of discovery.. and knowing the unusual condition it was in.
I can understand him not wanting to go down the “conspiracy” path with this.
Who ever went through the effort of doing this to Peter would likely have no qualms about silencing a talkative old hunter.
No, the cat’s out of the bag now. Plus Dave doesn’t believe in ‘conspiracies.’ If anything happened to him, if anything it would be a big red flag, which they don’t want.