The following is an edited version of a much more detailed debunking of the test used for COVID-19, the PCR Test, which has been used to manipulate the COVID numbers to pull off the PTB ‘Great Reset’ (it also exposes the HIV/AIDS fraud), based on the testimony of the late Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the process. Click here for the essay. (Notwithstanding the important information, I found the writing overlong and ragged.)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus
“Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.” –Kary Mullis, Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction
What do we mean when we say somebody has ‘tested positive’ for the Corona Virus?
We’ve been hijacked by our technologies, but left illiterate about what they actually mean. In this case, I am in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.)
His name was Kary B. Mullis, and he was one of the warmest, funniest, most eclectic-minded people I ever met, in addition to being a staunch critic of HIV “science,” and an unlikely Nobel Laureate, i.e. a “genius.”…
Above: Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explains why it is not meant for diagnostics.
One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.
The people who have taken all your freedoms away in recent weeks, they’re social engineers, politicians, globalist thought leaders, bankers, WHO fanatics, and the like. Their army is composed of “mainstream media,” which is now literally a round-the-clock perfect propaganda machine for the Gates-led Pandemic Reich.
Kary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand. Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them. Their weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t. Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR. [The test they are basing the numbers on]…
Of Mullis’ invention, Polymerase Chain Reaction, the London Observer wrote:
“Not since James Watt walked across Glasgow Green in 1765 and realized that the secondary steam condenser would transform steam power, an inspiration that set loose the industrial revolution, has a single, momentous idea been so well recorded in time and place.”…
#
“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”
I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19.
“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”
One of the countless head-spinning mysteries of this whole Corona Situation has been the advent of famous people, from Tom Hanks and his wife, to Sophie Trudeau, to Prince Charles announcing they had “tested positive” for COVID-19 and were self-quarantining. In all these famous-powerful people cases, the symptoms were either non-existent or mild. Why, one wondered, did they make such hay about it?
#
We do live now in a world dominated by a Corona virus, as my friend Kevin Corbett, a retired nurse in the UK puts it, “with knobs on it.” Shrek-Green is the color that was chosen. We’re lost in a simulation, seeking to grab hold of “truth” and reality. One way that I do that is to grab hold of words, slow them down, and analyze them. Globalists love to weaponize words and make spells out of them. Hypnotics. To this end, they invent new words, and force you to use them and live them. Words like “Corona Virus,” and “Social Distancing.” “COVID-19.” “Tested Positive.”
#
In the early 1990’s, PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction) came into popular use, and Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize for it in 1993. PCR, simply put, is a thermal cycling method used to make up to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, making it large enough to study. As it correctly says on PCR’s Wikipedia page, PCR is an “…indispensable technique” with a “broad variety” of applications, “…including biomedical research and criminal forensics.” [Italics mine.] The page goes on to say, to my [Mullis, the inventor of the test] dismay, that one of the applications of PCR is “…for the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”…
“The first thing to know is that the test is not binary,” he said. “In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative.
“What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”
“Wow,” I said. “That’s so important. I think people envision it as one of two things: Positive or negative, like a pregnancy test. You “have it” or you don’t.”
“PCR is really a manufacturing technique,” Crowe explained. “You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great… This is where it gets wild.
“In one paper,” Crowe says, “I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.”
Amazing the information you can find with an iPad and cell phone reception.
“I think if a country said, “You know, we need to end this epidemic,” They could quietly send around a memo saying: “We shouldn’t be having the cutoff at 37. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.”
Yes, you read that right. Labs can manipulate how many “cases’ of Covid-19 their country has. Is this how the Chinese made their case load vanish all of a sudden?…
And so basically this says that the test is not detecting infection. Because if it was, like if you’re infected, and then you’re uninfected, and you’re in a hospital with the best anti-infective precautions in the world, how did you get re-infected? And if you cured the infection, why didn’t you have antibodies to stop you getting re-infected? So, there’s no explanation within the mainstream that can explain these results.”
“I’ve been quoting Alice in Wonderland a lot recently,” David says, “because it’s the only way I can wrap my head around it. Alice said: “Sometimes I can believe six impossible things before breakfast!”…
#
“There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”…
“PCR for diagnosis is a big problem,” he continues. “When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.”…
#
I asked Crowe what he thought Kary Mullis would say about this explosion of PCR insanity.
“I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique,” he said. “Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”…
“I just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference [Event 201], 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan,” I interjected. “It was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins.”
“David, in conclusion, finish this sentence: “The PCR test for Corona is as good as…it’s as good as that Scientology test that detects your personality and then tells you need to give all your money to Scientology. “
Allan
As with 9/11, there is not one aspect of the ‘Pandemic’ that stands up to scrutiny….
Oh, and hey, I love Vernon Coleman, the ‘Old Man in a Chair.’ Here’s his todays talk:
Thank you again for all you do, Allan.
And thank you for mentioning Vernon Coleman, ‘The Old Man in a Chair”. I had never heard of him, but am avidly following his 2x/week talks.
Please keep up the good work.
Knew people from Columbia that went to HS with him, said he was “the smartest person” they ever met. But did not know he was born in Lenoir NC (lived there 76-87, HORRIBLE place).
PCR is great for fungal (mold) species analysis & COVID IAQ “presence” (if done by AssuredBio of Oak Ridge TN’s methodology). I use them every week and am tomorrow in Charlotte. But as an analytical for + or – an individual, that’s BS. It just shows there are viral particles present, not a disease.
This is the single best article I’ve ever read from Allan, perhaps because it’s carefully edited, shortened. Any sane thinking person must have his mind opened a bit more. It’s the best on this topic, at this stage, anywhere. Send it far and wide.
On what to do, I ask myself, just in a personal, positive way. Well, stay calm, clean your blood.
Turn off media, pray if you know how to. Help at a hospice. See/read any Solzhenitsyn like ‘One Day’, remember he endured. Keep your spirits up, on an even keel, basically what Allan is doing.
Cleaning blood. Essiac daily will help. Sunshine. Regular sleep, decent amount. Go herbal (look it up). Fast. Plantain. Black walnut. Will send links to Allan. Get a ‘Terminator’.
That’s it. Enough. Feeling good, clear-headed after this article. Worth reading again.
Thank you, Allan.
Fantastic article, Allan!
The Germzilla Psyop:
http://theseagypsyphilosopher.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-germzilla-psyop.html#more
The old man in the chair is promulgating the “virus as hoax” theory. This is a potentially deadly and dangerous assumption. Do you believe that CV19 is a Chimeric Virus and a Pandemic Pathogen or is it a hoax – a trick, if you will? (I concur that the fear-mongering is ramped up to excess, and numbers are skewed, and done so in pursuit of a nefarious Bill Gates style agenda).
When we (I hope all of us) know it’s nothing to do with caring for our health, but all about power & control – what do you think Kristan?.
Have you looked around out there for even one “covid19 victim” – or preferably someone who was held hostage in quarantine while they “recovered” to talk to about it?.
We and our grapevine still can’t find anyone 7 months later.
Do you want that computer geeks injection?.
I ran across the original article and tried to post it to fb earlier today, and FB refused to post it and not only that, threatened to suspend my account if I post such things again. Then I find your blog email in my spam folder (Yahoo), again, despite having repeatedly marked it as not spam when it had gone there before.
Ok. So the PCR “test”, (not meant to be used for diagnosing diseases) is being used incorrectly to trick us into presumably much higher numbers of “cases” (or lower numbers when that outcome is desirable). And Bill Gates, Johns Hopkins, CDC, WHO, et al, are running a Big Reset (pre-planned at the Agenda Meetup (last November or so). However we also know that Potential Pandemic Virus Research is ongoing for past 20 years. Funded by DOD, Johns Hopkins, CIA, et al, chimeric viruses are created in University/Gubmint Labs with gain-of-function (swapping out spike protein genes and with sequential passage in animal hosts). Ergo, the virus is real and it is transmissible among humans. The science of Covid should be attempted to be understood and Covid should not dismissed as a hoax. This is obviously a bridge too far for many. I know science is hard.
A bridge too far? I love that expression. I assume you know where it comes from. … but a good summation of the situation, pretty much. What’s the problem?
The expression comes from the book (1974), or rather the film of it (1977), starring Sean Connery as Major-General Urquhart, whose division was mauled at Arnhem (in the Netherlands, on the Rhine), trying to take and keep the bridge in question. The action was such a fuck-up that Field Marshal Montgomery actually admitted having made an error — though he may have meant the abandonment of the Canadians at Antwerp.
This is a nice example of the way most new expressions have entered the language — as titles: ‘Seven Year Itch,’ ‘Catch-22,’ ‘Soylent Green,’ ‘Back to the Future,’ ‘the Matrix,’ etc. However, most people use this one in its original sense –i.e., over-reach, hubris, biting off more than you can chew. Kristan here uses it to mean something like ‘beyond the Pale’ — science being so hard for common folk, who shudder at it and recline again into their superstitious easy chairs.
Alan, the fact that there are Frankenstein pathogens out there does not warrant ‘ERGO the [Covid] virus is real.’
And neither, if TPTB really do release something this autumn, something worse, will that prove that Covid has been real.
Allan, two Ls, sorry.
They know. Here the German Health Minister, explaining the consequences of false positive test results, in June. https://youtu.be/kwjpFxAJCIE
Last year he has been beating the drum for mandatory measles vaccination, and a change to an opt out organ “donor” registration. There are rumors, he just bought a big mansion for himself and his BF.
But I digress, every physician knows, much testing, many results. They know about the Koch postulates, joking he must be rotating in his grave, knowing what the RKI, named after him, is doing.
Headline this weekend, Merkel, the eternal chancellor, meets that climate girl, to “talk” about “saving” the climate. This is just dumbing down.
We’ve not been “hijacked” by technology, as stated above, we’re under constant attack by propaganda. Talking science at this point is taking the bait. One goal is to unite the people, next appointment is Berlin, August 29.
Starring in the above video, Rear Admiral Stephen Redd, currently serving as Director of the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. in uniform, said: “governments have to be willing to do things that are out of their historical perspective…er, ah, up up, for the most part, it’s really a war footing that we need to be on.”
Here is another snippet of evidence that tells us that the martial/maritime-corporate-medical-syndicate is at war. It’s a virus they are ostensibly at war with as they shoot all the turkeys that are rounded up in the Stephen Paddock Turkey Containment Compound, named after the supposed gunman who did the Vegas Cowboy Massacre. Brave warriors blowing the guts out of all the turkeys, that are over proliferating and making the men upstairs feel crowded.
What does this have to do with my post? This is not your private forum to talk about whatever is on your mind.
ACW: What does this have to do with my post? This is not your private forum to talk about whatever is on your mind.
It references the video that you posted, “Did Bill Gates and World Economic Forum Predict…” where at 0:04 we see Rear Admiral Stephen Redd giving a segment of his talk.
So, will you still ask what it has to do with your post? This in not my private forum? Yes, but it is a forum, with public dimensions, and that means there is a requisite for freedom of speech as long as it can be argued to be topically relevant. But where the atmosphere is oppressive and humorless, arguments tend to walk on eggs, striving maybe just to keep the channel open and not offend. The many layers of context that pertain to critical social developments cannot be contained by assertions of territory. I have said nothing that could detract from discussion about the bogus diagnostic use of the PCR test. But, I own the topic as much as anyone.
I say that’s just inside the ballpark, Al. Give a little. Just maybe a bridge too far forya? wild claims and wild forums – or is it fora? – make for interesting dialogue.
What is your test for reality? For example, the wildfires that are burning in Colorado. One was caused by lightening, another one was likely caused by some fucking idiot throwing a cigarette a car window. The other two are beetle kill areas, a so spark from a flat tire could have caused them.
It wasn’t the PTB that caused them.
Tell me how you distinguish truth?
Cory,
Shelly Lewis did an interview with 28 year fire service veteran, Captain John Lord about the fires in California which were reported as natural, but in the light of the evidence of suspected official arson, were nothing of the kind. This video was censored by Evil Goo-gul. Can’t find it but have it on file. Even though interviewer is down credited by being a proponent of flat-earth nonsense, the interviewed Captain speaks for the truth independently of the overall beliefs of the interviewer. I guess we have to get whatever outlets we can and hope bad associations and nonsense can be discoursed out later. I mention the Lewis interview because it takes us out in the field to see what he’s talking about. The one I’m linking to never gets off the couch, but it’s good to know what he’s sayin anyway. A good interview. This guys got all the cred you could ask for.
Your supposition that the PTB doesn’t start fires is uninformed. Get a load of this evidential hearing and be blown away. He said, the only plausible explanation for what he witnessed was directed energy weapons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCzwreu-75I
“What kind of forest fires’ leave trees intact, but vaporize homes without a trace? Appliances, granite countertops, toilets, … stonework, etc, completely vanished.”
What are you going on about? Start your own blog.
What am I going on about? When are you going to realize that your territory utilizes and extends into an exploitation of a multi-layered context that no single person owns? However, getting my own blog sounds like a good idea.
It really is a good idea. You might then get an idea of how much work it is and how much it costs.
What do wild fires have to do with anything?
Okay, I get that it’s a lot of work. And maybe you’re just trying to get me to pony up. Okay, if you have a way of getting a letter, I can mail a $20.0 dollar bill. Otherwise, asking what wildfires have to do with anything is like asking what weapons have to do with warfare. Besides, what it’s about is not the generalization of wildfire, but the specific forensic problem of arson performed by a military of unknown identity. Your work may be overloading your ability to read what is written instead of skimming for keywords to fill in the preconceived.
Fast fires with high winds and unbelievably hot core temperatures, as well as a random chaotic burn patterns does that, meta. Might not burn everything, but will absolutely melt, vaporize, and destroy some. You are just full of poorly informed conspiratorial bullshit. Here in California we find this out all the time, unfortunately.
“ asking what wildfires have to do with anything is like asking what weapons have to do with warfare”. WTF.
He’s talking about the powers that be ptb that yer so paranoid about. For good reason. What he says does pertain because he is relating to this whole virus story and the origin of the virus is a dark Wuhanee swamp where the bats fly and belfry is very crowded with remonstrating figures. Did you check that Medium piece by Shin Jie Yong about there being 1100 releases that happened of toxins, viruses, bacteria between ?2012 to 2016 I think it was. 1100. And the Wuhan lab which is Level IV – highest security – had a few breaches and was cited for them. So, the next question is: since the cases, the first ones, started to appear in Wuhan, and it wasn’t from the wet markets, as Yong discusses, and it didn’t appear anywhere else in the beginning. It likely started in Wuhan, probably from a release from their lab. (I’m still not sure if their Virology Institute is one and the same as the Level IV lab where pathogens are played with.) Was it another boneheaded inadvertent leak or was it a ptb ting? Yong also does discuss the gain-of-function experimenting happening at the Wuhan lab, which you turned me onto via Dr. Buttar referring to the Nature magazine article where that was discussed in November I think 2015 is the correct year. So PTB, what are we wreaking here? Medium is a forum for publishing almost anything. There are many covid-19 articles and various claims. Yong’s articles are worth checking out. More very timely pertinent Covid-19 virology masks videos are being shown on Vu Medi. Most are 5-20 minutes. Check the Monica Gandhi video about masks decreasing the severity of one’s Covid’s symptoms, when exposed to varying viral loads. She’s from UC at SF.
Conrad,
I think Metatoast may be remonstrating about reasons to downplay the interesting science vs. bogus science conflict, and up-play the total war footing of those hammerheads that see every problem as a reason to kill. I mostly agree with Horst when he says: “Talking science at this point is taking the bait.” It’s interesting to some who have good memory and can keep the minutia of arcane technical rhetoric in order, and disciplined by a need for balance with other more comprehensive contexts; but it tends to become the crux and pivot to the terrifying prospect of an entire world sliding into fulfillment of Hollywood’s worst predictive programming. War and the prospect of it is simply one of those higher orders of context.
Let’s not forget that psychological operations are a crucial aspect of warfare. It’s important to understand that the weapon of psyop and it’s adjunct of propaganda has been legally unleashed on the American people. Do we have to guess who they have characterized as an enemy?
Did you just speak of yourself in the third person, meta? I think Chris thinks that is strange. Lose track of which persona you were posting under?
Good point, Chris, re Metatoast referring to himself thusly. He may have forgotten which avatar he was blabbing under. Me, I can’t understand his prose.
Ditto. What does this have to do with anything?
Sorry Allan
I forgot to include a link to the original essay, which I found overlong and poorly written. The info, however, stands up; the fact that the testing (and therefore ALL the stats) is rigged is the most vital single piece of evidence that COVID is still another black op. Here’s the ink:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/
Thanks so much again Allan.
Another give away to the biggest hoax in history, is they always call them covid19 CASES – not *INFECTIONS*.
And I mentioned the HANDS can&will carry a ton of cold/flu etc. germs (in the previous thread about the uselessness of masks).
Sadly Kary Mullis passed away before his time from Pneumonia – totally curable with vitamin C.
Lancet story slamming use of chloroquine and hydroxichloroquine to treat COVID-19, unravels…
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/mysterious-company-s-coronavirus-papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling
Yes, that was 2 months ago. On Jun 3 WHO resumed the studies they briefly paused because of that. However, they discontinued them a month later (early July), after it became obvious that the hydroxychloroquine was actually not working and making things worse. So yes, there was a potential problem with the original studies, causing them to resume the hydroxychloroquine arm of the giant WHO study, but the results ended up being confirmed. Hydroxychloroquine sucks at helping with COVID-19, and can be harmful.
Trump was hawking oleander extract as a possible treatment now. Maybe hemlock will be next?
How does it go again? Person, man, woman, camera, tv… Uh I mean Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, Injected disinfectants, poisonous oleander extract.
I recall reading somewhere, that the HCQ tests in question, were carried out on elderly patients with co-morbidities who were quite advanced in respiratory distress. These few patients were also given THREE TIMES the recommended dosage of HCQ, which resulted in a cytokine storm which likely was the cause of death….if memory serves.
Early use of HCQ, resulted in a 77.4% lowered mortality rate.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/important-doctors-forum-hcq-fights-back-facebook-obliterates-garbage-fact-check-site-deeply-flawed-analysis-killed-thousands/
also very detailed excellent interesting character/factual article in New York Times about Dr. Desai who was the one, the overly ambitious one, who was creating a data company. And two very important reportings including the Lancet mentioned one, and another one from JAMA were based on his actually non-existent data which was supposed to be MEGA-data. Leading at least the Lancet refutation of hydroxychloroquine’s efficiency to be retracted just two weeks after it had been published. So watch the studies. We scientists and citizens have to keep our critical minds engaged. But Covid-19 is no hoax. Ask the families of people who died from it because they believed our booboronguss president, who is incapable of dealing with it.
Hah, you were spell-checkified: efficacy->efficiency
It has been much less deadly than the seasonal flu.
Far more people are dying from CANCER – now that is the real plague out there, and heart disease.