It’s interesting that this doesn’t seem like much of an issue to many of you. I get it, though. I’ve been watching and editing films for a decade, many of them documentaries that include that portion of Ike’s speech. It really is possible that I’ve heard it/seen it a hundred times.
When it came on the other day with the stutter, I’m telling you the hair stood up on my neck and I had to sit down. But I get it that that’s just me, and that a part of this is how sure I am that I never heard it that way before. And I had it on my editing ‘timeline’ (a Final Cut term) and futzed with it in an old version of Water Time. (Obviously, I would 
have noticed a stutter.)
Another problem — a reason why many don’t see this as important — is that to understand the strangeness of the ME you have to think of it on several levels, levels that make ‘everyone remembers it wrong’ or ‘anything can be digitally changed nowadays’ or ‘it’s another psyop’ sound reasonable when they are actually irrelevant to a ‘rational’ explanation. The best long-standing example of this is still ‘Dolly’s braces,’ from Moonraker. I mean if the best the PTB can do (via MM) is ‘The spooks break into our houses and libraries and change everything’ then we know, or should know, that something out of the ordinary is going on.
It’s similar to the moon numbers, which necessitates multi-leveled thinking as well, and then, when the true strangeness kicks in, we are likely to wave it off and try to forget about it, and the implications thereof. Like at the end of Terminator, when Sarah Conner is sitting in the Jeep trying to figure out the contradictions inherent in time travel to the past– in essence, the tremendous hole in the story we just watched — and then she says ‘You could go nuts trying to figure it out.’ This was James Cameron ‘plugging up’ the hole in his story. Don’t worry about it! Life is more fun if you don’t think about it. And so forth.
Jeopardy! is a good source of ‘residue.’ Here they gave the nod to ‘savings time’ although it is ‘saving’ with no ‘s’.
The other similarity with the moon numbers is that a ‘higher power’ is also inferred, when you get right down to it. And with the numbers it looks like that higher power is alerting us to its existence with those numbers: Since both chance & necessity are ruled out (as causes of the matching numbers), there is no choice but to point a finger at an ‘intelligent designer’, who is maybe curious to see if anyone notices.
Google Trends tells us no one thought it was the ‘wolf’ and the ‘lamb’ in the Bible. Everyone is wrong, apparently. What are the odds?! Compare with the next image…
And of course almost no one does.
Addendum: I have to repeat that the ME is not a condition one ‘has’ or ‘suffers from (or does not),’ but rather the disparity (between ‘believers’ and non-believers) is a function of ‘denial,’ in the same sense as belief in the official story of 9/11, or anything comparable. It’s just another level of that. When reality itself breaks down, we really don’t want to hear about it, and are likely to revert back to ‘simplistic’ causation, like ‘faulty memories’ or ‘a psyop.’
Yes, I know about Occam’s Razor, including the ending, which says that ‘simple is better’ only if simple explains all the evidence.
All these folks are wrong! What are the odds?!
I do agree with the ‘extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’ demand, although key in this piece of ‘wisdom’ is defining ‘extraordinary.’ What’s more ‘extraordinary,’ that millions of people are all wrong about something in the same exact way, or that a ‘higher power’ is manipulating them/us? See, in this case we can’t use numbers, not really, to ‘figure the odds’ one way or the other. Same with the moon numbers. The problem in both cases is that we have only one ‘data set’ to work with: This solar system, just one. This universe, just one. This reality, just one. You can’t figure numerical odds with only one data set. So it will come back to this question: Do you trust your own memory?
Anyway, I trust I will be forgiven for assuming you all would jump up and down in agreement that the stuttering is a ME. But the point still remains that as of a couple days ago, the first 27 versions of Ike’s Speech came up with 17 stutterers (the ‘new’ version) and 10 non-stutterers (the ‘old’ version that, it seems, everyone remembers). Almost twice as many new versions as old.
I love this one. This one frame from an old movie indicates that… with the island west of Oz, the globe maker got it wrong… or something…
What are the odds that all these people never came across the ‘new’ version? Miniscule. Probably in the one in a million area. If you don’t believe me on this, I will try to find the peer-reviewed studies that verify the veracity of human memory when many people agree on something.
Addendum: I am currently listening to Zeitgeist Addendum (a pretty good film), which I’m told contains the ‘old’ version without the stutter. I’ll then archive it, along with the date of archiving and the date of the film. It would be great if some of you did the same thing with other films that are likely to include the clip. There are a shit load of them. Then we wait and see…
We may be in a unique circumstance. As mentioned, I just saw the ‘new’ version for the first time, having recently seen the old. This could mean that we’re in a ‘transitional period’ between one version and the other. Yes, I know, this is a mind-bending concept, and tempts us to wave our arms and claim faulty memories or a psyop.
Compare this with the ones that follow. Looks like we even changed our place in the physical universe. How to explain?
How about those who are so sure nothing weird is going on just suspend judgement, at least for a while, sit back and wait to see if any of my archived videos ‘change.’ (I would ask you all to put both versions of my Ike Archive videos onto your hard drives, just to be sure. This one and this one.) Check them for accuracy first, i.e., see if I mixed up versions. One video separates the old ones and the new ones; in the other they alternate.
The question comes down to this: Is it our minds being fucked with or that which is outside of our minds being fucked with? When you put it this way you tend to see the problem: If we can’t really separate minds from matter (‘matter’ here being digital media) then the question becomes extra-complex, if not meaningless. At least that’s the way I look at it.
#
I reread Nick Bostrom’s ‘Simulation Theory,’ mainly because I wanted to see if he is as full of shit as I remember. Check this out:
If the environment is included in the simulation, this will require additional computing power – how much depends on the scope and granularity of the simulation. Simulating the entire universe down to the quantum level is obviously infeasible, unless radically new physics is discovered. But in order to get a realistic simulation of human experience, much less is needed – only whatever is required to ensure that the simulated humans, interacting in normal human ways with their simulated environment, don’t notice any irregularities. (my emphasis)
Look at distance from the center and you get three different results. (And where are the stars in Sagan’s Pale Blue Dot?)
Wow. Here is a guy who spends a lot of time and mental energy wowing us with his higher-learning lingo — in telling us we’re almost certainly living in a simulation — yet not a peep out of him about a phenomenon that… I dunno… a horde of people see as the sort of ‘irregularity‘ he’s talking about!! I mean, can you even imagine better ‘evidence’? Why isn’t he all over this? Again, isn’t it exactly what he tells us to be on the alert for, as evidence of simulation? (Ditto the moon numbers, by the way.)
No, old Nick, he’s not going anywhere near the Mandela Effect (or the moon numbers). See, as a philosopher in the employ of the PTB it’s okay to talk the higher power talk but not to walk the walk.
Here’s another example of how close his Simulation Theory matches the implications of the ME/moon numbers:
Looks like we are in three different places in the galaxy all at once. Look closely. Somebody is wrong by light years! Depends on when you ask.
In some ways, the posthumans running a simulation are like gods in relation to the people inhabiting the simulation: the posthumans created the world we see; they are of superior intelligence; they are “omnipotent” in the sense that they can interfere in the workings of our world even in ways that violate its physical laws; and they are “omniscient” in the sense that they can monitor everything that happens. [changing details just for the helluvit would be a piece of cake, and fun, too.]
Not to get off-track here, but do you all see how utterly full of it these PTB pundits really are? Bostrom could and should be doing surveys at his Future of Humanity Institute, to calculate the probabilities that millions of people remember major public and cultural events ‘the wrong way.’ (You can use Google Trends to see this without a survey.) See, the problem is that in many cases the probability would approach nil; and if all those people are not ‘wrong’, then we have direct evidence that we are living in a simulation! Can’t have that! Might make folks think that something is wrong. (If anyone is curious about just how full of it Bostrom is, go back and look at my Open Letter.)
Okay, I’m going to spend some time looking for documentary films with the Ike clip. I’d love some help on this.
Allan
Here’s an interesting essay on the ME. And this one on the ‘Eisenhower Dime,’ which I remember as a kid.
You questioned the Eisenhower’s stutter in the video we captured at the Eisenhower Museum and posted on our Conscience Films YouTube site. There is no question that this is the non-edited film recorded of him giving the talk. Many times a speech or talk is “cleaned up” if you will, and in this case edited to delete the stutter. I would never do this if I were editing and posting an event unless I was interviewing someone and they coughed or stuttered. Then I probably would try to edit it out to make if flow as intended. Editing out words to change the meaning is a totally different thing and is done all the time by the media but certainly not by the Eisenhower Museum. The Archivists at the Eisenhower Museum are excellent. Suggest you contact them if you have questions about Eisenhower’s original speech.
Allan, you are perceiving ME as if somebody has been fucking with our reality. The ‘Mandela Effect” was never meant this way. You are simply too suspicious, too paranoid it this case.
A Mandela Effect is literally false memory illusion (memory that arguably differ from reality, people misremember the exact same given thing in the exact same way). Nelson Mandela’s death is the best example of false memory illusion. Our own brain functionality is the cause.
Similarly visual/optical illusion is caused by visual system and is characterized by a visual percept that arguably appears to differ from reality.
Did you paste that crap from wiki?
English is not my native language so I borrowed some formulations. But the opinion is mine.
To quote one of the devils here (Kissinger):
“It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”
And the average man’s perception is shaped by the MSM. And such NLP crap as quoted by MP.
Oh! And my wife who is a skeptic and is interested in physics as a hobby (after laughing at me) suggested time travel. She was just reading a newer theory which suggests some ways in which this might be possible.
to Paul:
Physics relates to physical world. Mathematics serves as an abstract tool. In mathematics you can buy 5 apples, than give 7 apples to someone, than buy another 2 apples and left with 0 apples. It is not possible in real physical world.
Time is an abstraction derived from movement/changes in physical world. It does not exist (alone).
Physicists should research observable physical world and than make mathematical abstractions form observation. But they often do the opposite. They propose mathematical theories and try to apply them to the physical world (time travel is nice example). It is… utter nonsence.
Sorry, but everything you say lately is flawed.
I can be in possession of my last 2 apples, then buy 5 more apples, then give those 7 apples to Allan. Then I buy 2 more apples, then the PTB steal those last 2 apples.
Time exists in the non-physical world too, I have experienced it 1000’s of times.
You are just unable to comprehend what I wrote.
Yes, you are correct that time is an invented concept.
There is only change.
We infer the existence of time (or a dimension thereof) by creating devices that exhibit regular change.
I was discussing the Mandela Effect with a friend last night and surprisingly they knew all about it! Turns out that there is a whole sub on Reddit about the Berenstein Bears. Anyone remember the popular children’s series? Now they are all spelled Berenstain Bears with a Berenstain author’s family to match. Yet ~everyone I ask about it including my daughter who I read the books to remembers Berenstein without hesitation. I texted her a cropped pic of one of the books and asked her the name of the book series and her reply was “Berenstein Bears duh”. Sound like a daughter?
Here’s the link to the Reddit sub:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BerensteinConspiracy/
The consensus there is that it is parallel or diverging universes. That to me is the only thing that could easily account for the changes in the bible people are reporting. Been a long time since I’ve looked at my bibles, I’ll dig them out of a box when I get a chance and check but certainly I remember it as lion rather than wolf. No question about it.
Alan, I considered posting a link to your forum to the sub reddit but thought I should ask first. Not sure if you are ready for the kind of attention this might receive. Things might blow up here and naturally it wouldn’t all be positive, just like now. What’s your verdict on this?
Actually, I tried and got no replies. But sure, always do this when you are so moved. No need to ask.
The only ME I suffer from, is when I am pretty sure “they” have stolen another $50 off me, and when I look in my online bank account, “they” have stolen another $100.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/theres-a-new-movie-called-the-mandela-effect-so-i-watched
Digital storage changed stuff.
But when it gets to the point of
changing our minds/events unknowingly or
Knowingly…scary
tech is getting out of hand in the wrong ‘hands’.
Digital warfare is Insidiously ongoing.
It doesn’t feel right to have to be part of it to exist.
Exposing it is the only way to keep it in check…
I went back to the original audio source — the Congressional Archives — and it has the stutter: https://archive.org/details/DwightD.Eisenhower-FarewellAddressmilitary-industrialComplexSpeech_815
I really really really appreciate you Allan…I love your open mind and in my book you are a rare american citizen (a zombie nation like any other) wich is not a total idiot…but on this one, with all respect du to your past achieveent, i think you waste a bit of your precious time…BTW it seem the military industrial complex dont waste his time and begin 2020 strong with those Iranian /Iraqi generals blasted…good oil price.
Now, check back there in a few days!
I can’t help thinking the ME is a natural phenomenon , caused by jumping timelines and noticed by people who are paying attention . The action of omission by the ptb is a huge indication to it’s existence in my book . The masses are being intentionally kept in the dark and sent down a million rabbit holes that lead nowhere .
Are scientists attempting to interact with timelines ? 100% they are – they told us so. The stage at which this technology is at ? I would love to know.
It’s understandable that people are struggling with this , I went through bouts of shock, disbelief and amazement for months .
Time is derived from motion. There are no timelines.
Alternate time lines as in alternate – parallel realities or multiverse .
If you have more than one Universes able to communicate between each other, than you have in fact only one, because everything is connected, right?
And if you have more Universes unable to communicate between each other than in reality you end with only one because you can say nothing about the others. The others are pure fantasy.
How many realities do you live? How many places are you physically present in a moment?
Your first statement is incorrect , they’re not communicating with each other , our consciousness is somehow moving through them .
It looks to me like there is intelligence behind it. The Ike one, for example, is like they are telling us that our guard is down against the elite. There are many other examples like this.
Yeah ours , our consciousness brings to life reality and it’s constantly going through multiple parallel realities hence the ME .
Based on some of them — especially the biblical changes — we can rule out ‘random’. Some of The Bible changes are downright malicious (to a ‘Christian’). There are now passages that promote homosexuality, for example, which makes fanatical Christians go nuts. If it was random this would not happen. Same with the Ike one: Why change the most important single word in the whole speech, and make Ike ‘hesitant’? (We are letting our ‘guard’ drop, etc.) That is not random. (If you don’t think that’s the most important single word, find a better one.)
Hi Allan,
I wish you great year 2020, strong health, happy ride with your caravan and houseboat and lot of new insights in HTWRW.
Sorry, I see insufficient analytical and factual foundations for your far-reaching conclusions. No offence.
You wrote “Those who don’t ‘want to’ believe anything strange is going on…” (alleged Mandela Effects). It is not about believe, but hard facts. I spend many hours to analyze and verify informations in your last three articles. It was necessary for making my mind regarding Mandela Effect. Now I know that most of alleged ME can be explained, or at least explained differently.
BTW, I realized that you already made your mind regarding star visibility in outer space. Despite of fact that I heard only one argument from you, which is better star visibility in higher altitude/below thinner atmosphere.
Ever heard of the Hubble telescope??, it see’s perfectly fine through space, and OMG the picture of our nearest star the Sun , is incredible.
But that is nothing, over the 25 odd years it has been up there, staring into a black “empty” piece of space the size of the moon, it has pulled in 260,000+ Galaxies in that one spot! :-O
I think Allan has uncovered more mind games mischief,from the PTB Horned Gremlins.
I am sure Hubble is fake because of lethal space radiation (from Sun in the 1st place), space micrometeorites, violent temperature changes, funny/impossible repair by astronots…
Isn’t it strange we have pictures of galaxies but no real videos and pictures of Earth from outer space, let say geostationary orbit, from distance 30.000 km? Can you show me one picture from Hubble, which is taken in visible spectrum, and not artificially colored?
If you want to see real ‘Hubble’ than look at SOFIA telescope or VLT in Atacama.
LOL! you’re funny!.
If they looked at earth with Hubble, – then they would have to look at the MOON….and spend all their waking moments airbrushing out, all those very interesting things on the moon that they don’t want us to see!.
The starry night sky is all the colors of the rainbow when you stare into the milky way. Tho my eyeballs aren’t as good as they used to be today.
The natural colors are super, check this out folks > https://youtu.be/8EKl9aF4NnM
You must think the space station is fake too? (I don’t know if there really ever are humans inside it) , plenty of people have seen and photographed it through their telescopes.
If you look at Earth from Hubble you will even not be able to tell you are above the ball. Earth has diameter 12800 km and Hubble is allegedly 550 km above surface. Try to draw it. You will be very surprised how close it is.
You mentined Moon. It is 380 000 km away only and we have unbelievably poor, low resolution Moon pictures without any details. But we allegedly have wonderfull, colorfull, high resolution pictures of galaxies millions light years away. Just 1 ly ≅ 10^12 km.
You are talking about colors we can see from Earth surface. I was talking about view above the atmosphere. Can you see the difference (the atmosphere in between)?
All pictures showed in the linked video are created in Photoshop from pictures taken in different light frequencies than visible spectrum. It is not my speculation. NASA told it many times and you can find NASA videos how they have created such images. All colors (!) are completely artificial, it is an artist expression.
I don’t think or believe, I do know that ISS is fake. Basic physics, hard facts and common sence.
“plenty of people have seen and photographed it through their telescopes”
I admit, I don’t know what to think about such photographs yet. How many of them you know closer?
But I know for sure satellites like GPS and Galileo do not orbit Earth. It is all based on Earth, using ground stations, the signal is reflected from the ionosphere. You phone or navigation has been receiving complete informations how to compute alleged satellites position (ephemeirs). I consulted the functionality with insiders.
Marion Plissken, we will have to agree to disagree on most things and details.
One of you sent me a great link. It’s a wonderful example (although not a strong example, if you see the difference) of the ME:
https://forrestgump.fandom.com/wiki/Life_is_like_a_box_of_chocolates?file=Forrest_Gump_-_%26quot%3BLife_is_like_a_box_of_chocolate%26quot%3B
You play the video and he’s clearly saying ‘was like a box…’ Yet the headline says ‘is’. Do you really think a FANatic who would go to the trouble of making a web page wouldn’t hear it correctly? Clearly, ‘when’ the person made the page, the line was the ‘old’ ‘is’. The YT video is from 2011, so the page was made ‘after’ that (does anyone know how to check on the date of the page?).
I’ve archived a number of versions too Allan. I find this fascinating. You’re not alone.
Its strikes me, along with other possible explanations, a lot like the way crop circles appear quite suddenly, fully formed, almost overnight in that a “technology” creates some reality that we humans really have no way to explain. The temptation to doublethink such things becomes the defence mechanism of choice. But still, the high weirdness of such events stays in our brains at some level and, if we hit critical mass as a species, maybe our collective bs detectors will kick in and somehow these events get revealed. Are these cosmic jokers just playing with us?, humans with secret technologies showing off?, lapses of memory by the human collective?, (that one, as you point out is doubtful/impossible), an army of CIA peons flipping the internet?, (no), the simulation?
I don’t know but if someday in the future my archived clips suddenly don’t, or suddenly do stutter, then it’s ME, whatever ME is. That’s about the best we can do right now. As I said, I find this fascinating.
Well put. Even though I KNOW the ME is a real case of strangeness, I can’t help but assume that the archived clips will not change. But truly, if even one changes… wow… altho no one who denies it now will change their mind…
For me, the biblical changes are the best proof, via the sheer number of copies that had to be altered (and some of them are hundreds of years old). The lion and lamb bit. This is proof that it’s not a psyop, not by human spooks. Some of the biblical changes also indicate a sort of evil sense of humor, which is an important clue re the nature of the process.
The fact that the bible appears to be the most changed example (counting the grammar/punctuation changes) is possibly significant. This very well may be a ‘spiritual’ phenom. ‘Spooky’ in the other sense.
I’m following your commenters and replies. It is spooky.
I don’t think Stone’s film JFK, which has to be one of the most popular viewings of the Eisenhower segment has any stutter. It seems that anyone editing a sure hit like that would edit out the stutter.
PS: Could you provide a link to all the acronyms, and several of your responders, use? I don’t read the blog as much as I would like and I’m always forgetting the ones I DID know.
The movie JFK is a good example but as you say, an editor on the film might have done it if he saw a stutter.
You’re asking too much with a list of acronyms. Plus I don’t even know how to change the template of the blog, to provide a list. Anyone want to help?
You are a hoot! You are a bit like that old cropduster pilot on Independence Day… guy didn’t have a clue about flying a fighter but he knew where to aim!
You are like a savant blogger.
I decided to pop onto the www and get a good definition of “savant” and I got further spooked.
https://www.savant.com/
I’m researching SMART tech and the ability to use passive transmitters/receivers and if you go to the “savant” link?
Allan? What are the odds?
But the thing is they probably made several take of this speech and they just change some YT video with the stutter version…You know its easy for YT to search and replace video or even part of video…a video is compose of bit of information like a text file…Sorry but for me it did’nt prove the ME.
Who did it? Why? When? It must’ve been very recently, since I don’t know anyone who remembers the stutter. Now ask and answer the questions again.
Youtube is owned by Google, or the Alphabet corporation if you want…can be a black op like the flat earther channel. If they pay troll they can also hire people to mess with video on youtube..its in fact pretty easy
One example among many: Have you figured out how they changed hundreds of millions of bibles that used to read ‘The lion will lay down with the lamb’?
I know March comes in like a lion and goes out like a lamb, I have heard that one for a very long time. As for the lion laying down with the wolf, I would have said lamb, but I never looked it up till you said it changed.
Also please show me where Moses came down from the mountain with the 10 commandments inscribed on stone tables. Its still tablets.
Why they did it like anything else they do…to mislead people and to prove how powerfull they are…the When because it can be done by programming could be made anytime silently…it take fews seconds for a programm to achieve this task
“The question comes down to this: Is it our minds being fucked with or that which is outside of our minds being fucked with? ”
Both.
From both the local technologies outside of our awareness, and likely the non-local influences by the intelligent designers minions – whatever it may be.
Hey Allan. Long time. Much has happened, and been revealed. Just to add to the fun, another new ME vid has come out that added more HISTORICAL items to the list of insane ‘anomalies’… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCozkMqDHDI
To help settle this issue for you and those who read your blog, here is the ‘reality’ of this wacko situation: The cutting edge physicists are RIGHT: There are MANY PARALLEL UNIVERSES/TIMELINES which vary from being ‘almost identical’ to ‘extremely distinct’ from each other. Now in OUR case here in THIS ‘reality’, what we have been experiencing is a MERGING OF TIMELINES among the Collective of Humanity (since around 2012 🙂 ). Therefore, some of us have ‘memories’ of our particular individuated/unique/personal Consciousness’ ‘lifetimes’ that are of ‘this’ Timeline, while others among the population have ‘memories’ of THEIR ‘lifetimes’ that are actually of OTHER Timelines, the ones they ‘come from’. And that, btw, is THE simplest explanation I have ever heard (Occam’s Razor right?). And also makes the most LOGICAL sense, explains every.single.detail.and.aspect of the ME phenomenon — as long as you are willing to LET GO of your deeply programmed (by the PTW (Powers That WERE)) BELIEFS about ‘What is reality, and how does it function?’. Being a trained scientist, analyst, and logician, I have heard no other hypothesis that even comes close to this one. And simply shouting like a dumbed-down sheeple idiot “Oh, but that’s IMPOSSIBLE, people are just ‘remembering wrong’ en masse, stop with your wacko tin foil hat theories already!” (despite the fact that most modern physicists are totally aligned with this ‘tin foil hat wacko theory hehe) is, quite literally, THE greatest clinical proof of Cognitive Dissonance imaginable 🙂
Hope this helps clarify things, helps ppl get a better grasp on how PLASTIC this Multiverse truly is…and how powerful WE all are, as the Ones actually co-creating it ‘on the fly’, as we go, to maximize the fun of BEing the creators of our own experiences in the material realms of…well, ‘Creation’! 😀
“Is it our minds being fucked with or that which is outside our minds being fucked with?” Must be both at all times… no? We are only extensions of this reality as much as a tree and it’s limbs and leaves. Are we too arrogant in believing this brain and so called consciousness is what separates us from other animals and ‘non thinking’ living things. This higher power may be telling us we aren’t so special and subject to the same manipulations that some humans act onto others. What if M.E. and all creation/existence works or doesn’t on the balance of all things in the universe…so the more destructive and divisive that we get as a population… more discord and disruption is created. We are at a point in human history where the truth or apparent truth of what we see hear and feel is actively being call false on a daily basis. The demise of education has allowed this to bloom. I often come back to a lyric from one of your least favorite’s, Bob Weir/ J.Barlow, “We may be going to hell in a bucket, but at least I’m enjoying the ride.” The changes are happening…are they due to our own behavior as much as some other force of evil? some higher power? Is it a combination of these factors? Or are we really just the crazy ones in a world gone mad? Is there an actual point in this life, this world, or is it somewhat a cosmic joke that we struggle with.. until we get the joke and laugh at the absurdity of it all?
I’m dumbfounded. I actually played it for Nick (along with a pretty good video I discovered about it… prolly from you, to be honest.)
Froot Loops? No way? I would never have bought them spelled like that.
Seriously, Allan, the Mandela Effect is something that I’ve just sort of assumed happened because of mistaken memory or altered perception. Now that I’ve started traveling down this rabbit hole with you, I’m trying to decide if there is free will or if that’s just a bunch of caca, too.
If it makes you feel better, I have an issue with Ike’s speech because I’ve used it and quoted it many times. I did not remember a stutter. I checked an old source document and guess what? There is a stutter.
But, if it makes you feel better (it probably won’t) realize I used to work on a government data network and I think there were algorithms in place to go into backup data and make changes. Just like Winston in 1984.
I’ll try to get you a bit of gas money soon…
Happy New Year to a fascinating traveler on a journey to truth, whatever it may be and wherever it may hide.
https://universityofmetaphysics.com/free-will-or-predestiny/
I am NOT suggesting you delve into another rabbit hole, but letting you know you aren’t talking to dead space. Just dumbasses.
And, here you go.
I am researching for a blog post regarding dangers of 5G tech and guess what I discovered? The IKE video without the stutter!
I stopped it right there to share with you… I’ll continue with other research, but wanted to share it asap!
https://youtu.be/ol3tAxnNccY?t=2064
That’s a good one, Maggie! The more ‘other films’ we find with the clip, the better. We should archive ones like this to see if they change over time. Make sure to write down that they don’t have the stutter and the date of archiving and the date on the YT video. And we’ll see…
One of the writers over on TBP (still haven’t been able to figure out how to summarize your current musings for presentation there, but will… I’ve seen too many indications the ME is very much a side effect of, are you ready? 5G small cell placements.
The more I look at 5G, the more I want to make a mylar hat.