I wanted to avoid a debate on the details of the New Zealand shooting(s), for the simple reason that the PTB want us to
This is the frame after a shot ‘ruffled’ the guy’s blue shirt. No bullet hole. Oh, right, bad bandwidth, which erased the holes and blood on the wall as well…
get tied up in details and argue amongst ourselves, when, in the big picture, the details are unimportant, assuming we
agree on the simple truth that the shootings (real or not) were the work of the PTB. If this is not your view, please move on from this blog and do not leave comments.
We can learn something, however, even if I’ve said it before, which is that most if not all the ‘name’ alt media outlets are PTB moles. Few of the alt media (if any) voice my observation in the opening paragraph; most dive into the details and are quite adamant.
As of right now, the last two comments from ‘Poof Goes the Airgun’ are from ‘le berger des photons’ and ‘Todd.’ The former brings up Max Igan’s take on the shootings, agreeing with Max…
Please look at Max Igan’s take on this.
He believes that people are actually dead, why would the people who did this make an effort to save lives of sheeple?
He makes a lot of valid points, explains plausibly why we wouldn’t see blood, though not for a head-shot.
Remember we’re all on the same side, or we should be.
…while Todd points out….
NLP is riddled in his monologue, not as good a Corbett. He attributes the missing gore to… wait for it…. wait for it… low resolution and bandwidth! How funny those disappearing or missing evidence (blood, guts, etc.) ONLY applies to the gore and the relevant meat of the situation.
This Falcon 9 is about to disappear in a poof, with eyewitnesses.
Todd’s comment almost makes this current post unnecessary. He is 100% correct, IMO.
So what’s the takeaway? First, a tiny bit of history between Max Igan and me: A year or so ago I had been listening to Max and liked his analyses on HTWRW so I thought I’d try to verify that Max is in fact one of us, and not a ‘deep’ mole of the PTB. I sent him a package (via snail mail) containing a signed copy of Cosmic Banditos, a DVD of Water Time, and $20 cash, plus a letter wherein I voiced my concern that most of the alt media are moles; I told him that James Corbett was my first real tell, and included a link to my Corbett post (among other links). I went on, naming names, and so forth, particularly regarding the ‘Secret Space Program’ crew; my experiences with them. No need to repeat all that here, but I did point out that ‘space travel’ is of particular interest with PTB fakery. I sent him my early proofs that Musk/NASA is another fraud.
I mentioned (in my letter) the fact that all the important Apollo hoax exposers have this in common: They get their fans distracted and obsessed with Apollo, meanwhile never mentioning the current frauds. These names are on my ‘alert list,’ i.e., Bart Sibrel, Jarrah White (who severely regretted getting smart-ass with me), Marcus Allen, David Percy, and one or two others I’m blanking right now. No matter. See how simple it is? Sure, folks, Apollo was a hoax! But don’t let’s talk about star visibility in NASA imagery and obviously CGI-ed ISS footage… you get the picture.
Watch the linked video and compare this explosion to some real ones. Apparently, Max didn’t want to deal with this issue. Or my package got ‘lost in the mail.’
I assumed that Max did too. I didn’t hear back from him so I left a comment on one of his videos asking if he got my stuff, my book, DVD, 20 bucks and letter. Max replied tersely: ‘Never got it.’ Well, what are the odds that my little package got lost in the mail between here and Oz (cost me $25 and a lot of paperwork to send it!)? We’re not talking about some shit hole Third World country here. I checked the address I’d used and it was correct. Whaddya think? One in a hundred that a first class package gets lost? Something like that.
Odds are that Max was lying when he said he never received it. Odds are that Max didn’t want to get into a discussion about alt media moles. Same deal with my ‘alert list.’ They all (or almost all) know that any response is a lose-lose deal, since my evidence is pretty much inarguable, and given the staggering implications of the frauds I expose. (Watch this half million pound chunk of aluminum/titanium vaporize in 5 seconds in front of eyewitnesses and explain how it was done.)
As the shooter returns to his car, we hear ‘I am the God of Hell Fire!’ playing on the stereo. Perfect timing! What are the odds?
As Todd obviously did, listen to Max’s podcast on the NZ shootings. Notice how utterly, completely, 100% sure Max is that the shooting was ‘real’ (people died). Boy is he sure! Me, I’m not so sure. I’m 80 – 90% sure that it was faked (like Boston or Sandy Hook), but not sure sure, like Max.
‘I do not for a second believe that the event was a hoax and that people did not die.’ Really, Max? ‘There were real bullets, real blood, real dead people.’ Keep in mind he’s telling us this based on the shooter’s footage, in which, according to Max, ‘the bandwidth was so bad’ that you couldn’t see bullet holes and blood on the walls.
Addendum: Max gets really sarcastic when he says, ‘All they have to do is stage one event (his emphasis) like Sandy Hook, and everyone jumps on the bandwagon and believes every event thereafter is a hoax (no deaths)’… notice how he’s dripping with scorn for us idiots that ‘jump on the bandwagon.’ Well, Max, Sandy Hook wasn’t the only event of that sort, was it? Boston? Just about any event with a lone shoe image, actually. Yes, Todd, Max isn’t as subtle as Corbett, but he’s giving it a shot. (In case you haven’t noticed: When people are trying to lie to you in the face of the facts, they tend to use sarcasm and implied scorn if you disagree.)
Notice how many times Max repeats the words ‘Think about it, folks!’ words to that effect. Over and over, ‘Think!’ then he’ll say something like ‘Why wouldn’t they kill those people?’ Then he gets us nodding along with him as he tells us what bastards the PTB are, how they killed 3,000 on 9/11 (which isn’t even true) so why not kill those Muslims? Then ‘Think about it, folks!’
Well, Max, I was thinking, and wondering why they didn’t kill all those people at the Boston Bombing (100% faked, see Dave McGowan’s work, etc.) or Sandy Hook or half the shootings in Europe?
‘Why would they use crisis actors?’ Max asks us, with rhetorical subtext. ‘Think about it, folks!’
Why do they ever use crisis actors, Max? Do you actually have a point here? I think not.
What Max is doing is tweaking the arguments, the divisiveness, between us with the details of what exactly happened in New Zealand, meanwhile telling us not to do that!
‘Don’t fall into the divide and conquer trap,’ Max tells us, while giving us a shove in exactly that direction.
This is Musk’s titanium rocket about to disappear like a wisp.
And so it goes. (Yeah, Kurt is one of my literary heroes.)
I’ll not argue the case for a complete fraud (as opposed to a mind controlled but real assassin), except to agree with Todd, who finds it ridiculous that Igan blames just about every anomaly in the shooter’s footage on ‘low bandwidth.’ Yes, low bandwidth might ‘erase’ a bullet hole (on the wall, say) in one or two frames of tape, but it doesn’t erase them all in every frame. And the idea that there would be no holes or blood splatter on the walls behind the two piles of bodies, is, as I say, all I need to know.
I guess my point today is a simple one. If you are a fan of Max Igan, listen to his podcast and ask yourself, ‘What is the takeaway here?’
For me it was Gin up divisiveness while pretending to warn against it.
If you’re wondering why all the slight-of-hand with people giving different opinions (be they moles or not) and all the shouting and arm waving about what happened… this is largely to provide more data for the A.I. algorithm that’s keeping track of who is believing what and what they do upon coming across new information (like Max’s podcast, say). To the monster A.I. (at Langely/Fort Meade/Tavisock/wherever) all this nonsense is really valuable grist for its predictive mill.
Allan
Regarding NLP (my simple definition thereof), listen to what is repeated over and over and how that idea is framed, and you will understand what is really being said.
Oh, and to ‘les berger des photons’: don’t worry about it. This is only my opinion. Maybe just give it some thought.
Last addendum: According to Max, Vinny Eastwood’s sister knows someone who died at Christchurch. Make of that what you will, regarding Vinny.
To Allan Weisbecker,
Thanks for your site and all the comments regarding this serious social construct. It is obvious that the video and whole N.Z. event is fake. “They” are all “guilty until proven innocent” when it comes to police “investigations”. The picture of the crises actor’s bodies huddled up; are you kidding? No blood spray.! No bullet holes! Bandwidth problems and yet you can read the graffiti on the air guns? Two different mosques might be a bit of a stretcher for the media but they will survive it somehow. Max Egan or Igan is a goof if he thinks anything will take down that government when all the cops and all the authorities including Rump, buy into that farce. Mix truth in with falsehood and look what you get. Even the “shooter’s” face looks like it’s glued onto a video game character. This is a good test as to how complete overt, covert and self-censorship can be. Even Live Leaks were whining about how they would not allow any of this fake video to be posted. This is a big first in censorship history with the bonus of compliance of a meek populace to “turn in your guns comrades”! This video could have been put together months ago.
I had a thought about crisis actors. I wonder if they use those under mind control. They could have their memories of the day wiped afterwards. They also wouldn’t ask any questions. What do you think?
As far why they may have used a hoax here rather than false-flag murders, I wonder if it’s at least partly the thrill they get out of fooling people so completely.
This post has not convinced me that Max Igan is a shill/ agent. What points did you expect him to address, specifically? I found his responses thoughtful and reasonable. I’m coming in bit late on this Christchurch thing and am very frustrated that I can’t get a look at the original in order to judge for myself. Mol sounds convincing, being a local source of info confirming that there were indeed many injured. Having met Max personally at Free Your Mind in Philly a few years back I found that he presents himself in person very much as he comes across on his show. When I jokingly brought up some of the FE points that were popular at the time, he helped me clear up some of my own confusion and even went out of his way to introduce me to a geodetic surveyor who explained some details about how he measures curvature. To my mind Max has been a consistent and humble advocate for human freedom. Ken O’Keefe, on the other hand, seemed a bit disingenuous when speaking one to one. Who, more than Max Igan, has been as vocal against the current 5G rollout? If he’s a limited hangout working for the dark side, he’s also a fucking great actor.
Well, if this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0ijhkwlmAtjg/
Plus this:
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YHH5Y84M3SAY
Plus his misdirection (not answering any of my questions) doesn’t persuade you, nothing will. IMO Igan is a deep mole along the lines of Miles Mathis (although not as complex). Every level of ‘truth’ has moles. If you haven’t been following my posts, maybe you don’t know that.
Thanks for the links to the original. I actually found it myself a couple hours ago. Looks like Max will be debating Fetzer on Friday. Let’s try to keep our minds open as more info on this black op comes in. Here’s Max’s latest on the topic. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IamRHgc_aGI&feature=youtu.be
Here’s the debate.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qLT7DSBB40g#
Too bad the debate (esp. Fetzer) didn’t bring up the pre-planted magazine/clip that miraculously fits the shooter’s ‘weapon’.
Go to timestamp 6:53 [from the ‘shooter’ video], then look at the video one frame at a time – you will see just below the wallboard on the leftside of the hallway a magazine ALREADY planted that the shooter will start using later at 8:32
The implications of an already present ammo clip raises enormous issues and causes a continuity problem, like how did it get there, who put it there, why would anyone hang out with an ammo clip laying on the ground waiting to be shot later!?
You cannot explain away the presence of the ammo clip with any low bandwidth low resolution issue – this is an action taken by the ‘shooter’ for all to see.
For some reason Todd’s comment has no reply button.
In one of his videos on the subject Max states that the shooter clumsily drops a bunch of clips and that the one you refer to bounced to the point where we can see it. The shooter himself speaks about it, saying that he had to keep returning to the hall for clips in the midst of the “fire fight”. Anyone have anything to say about the images of the man in red? Looks like a handler to me. To me Fetzer exposed his psyop self in the debate. Why is it so hard to believe that the powers that shouldn’t be actually killed people?
To rightfully discern physical realities is more important than arbitrary readings on social political event. I’m glad Max helped you with the flat-earth confusion. I hope in the future you would get the chance to continue onto hyperbolic geometry and its equivalence of special-relativity.
If you compare the video of New Zealand with that of Boston for example not only is the video quality of the former dramatically inferior the prompt cut-off of telecommunication world-wide ensured permanent loss of chain-of-custody.
Anyone who would like to study this recent public event should go through legal channels to focus on victimology since the video itself is no longer admissible in court without a full-on digital forensics analysis tracing back to the moment of initial data transmission.
I think Fetzer and Dammegard have done a good job on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E51trKtI_sI
curious whether people here are going to denigrate Mr. Fetzer.
Dr. Fetzer has always been my go-to guy on false-flag operations. He works with credentialed mathematicians and physicists to follow up on details which at times might not be perfect but it’s the right way to go.
If you haven’t noticed, Allan does not have any systematic nor original contribution to the New Zealand video nor Sandy Hook nor Boston. (Just compare his doodling with Fetzer and his colleagues’ blog.)
Recent years Allan’s been busy selling pseudoastronomy and ‘big ideas’ with zero mathematical understanding and cheery-pick the numbers useful for his projected nonsense.
I am commenting because I can.
I’m glad I asked you to look at Max Igan the other day. The request had some interesting results.
Yes, answering questions that weren’t asked while not answering questions that were asked is already bad.
Doing so with subtleties like tone of voice to make someone who trusts you fail to notice is even worse.
Thanks for your logic, A.C.
But you should know better at your young age of 71 not to pick on an old man of 61.
Perhaps Igan is just here to stir the pot. The whole NZ shooting seems to do two things, the first to help the cause of banning guns in NZ.
Secondly, it seems like it’s being used by the rest of the world to censer dialogue about events like these. They banned Alex Jones, who is a shill, and now information on the anti-vaccine front. Next, they’ll probably ban political talk about NZ and other events as being hate speech or something like that.
Anyway, your conversation with Max in the Comments was pure gold, lol, the guy didn’t even bother to read a damn thing you said.
Igan posted in his own comments the text (exactly) he used to answer me. From the dates it’s unclear if he wrote it for us here and pasted it there or vice versa. In any event, it’s nice when we can be SURE someone is a mole, rather than just suspecting it, as with most alt media outlets… It’s also interesting to note (retrospective reading his posts) just what the PTB will say to gain our trust. Also keep in mind that a main reason for the Max Igans (and Corbetts, etc.) is as grist for their A.I. mill. See who is paying attention and what they do as a result of taking in the info, the latter especially.
There is also this issue of the PTB’s occult beliefs — they have to tell us what they are up to in order to shift the ‘karma’ onto us. So the Igans are not totally useless.
Yeah your probably right about the AI mill. It’s probable they all have a Dangan on most of us via some supercomputer somewhere, all that data being generated can either be sold to the highest bidder or put in data dumps. Let alone Consumer report information, for instance, I always wanted to see my school records, but it’s near impossible to get ahold of.
Whatever the reason the PTB are telling us what they’re up to, the fact that they do means they are confident in how stupid people are so I would hope that was still bad karma on them as they are the ones who try to make people stupid.
It seems also that Hollywood has been disaster programming us for a long time towards some sick science fiction future. Like the pre-9/11 event programming, and now some other disaster not far off we’ll all accept. I can’t go a day without seeing some sort of nuclear bomb reference in popular culture in the movies or T.V.
Max Igan is a typical stereotype of the so called intelligence agencies.
How so? Because they are the end product of mind control programming.
The easiest way to see their faults is that they are taught to lie from day one.
The CIA call it plausible denial, they keep saying the same lie over and over again, it was Hitler orGoebels who said “Tell a lie make it a big one tell it over and over until in the end they’ll believe it”.
The truth is that all the psyops now are fake,why ? Because it’s easier for them,less messy also so nobody takes them to court to sue for damages.
They don’t care if a minority of the populace see through it their aim is to hoodwink the majority which they have acheived successfully time after time.
Have you got an actual strategy to survive the cull once they unleash the killer robots?
Just to wrap this up (I hope): It’s not impossible that people were really killed but the ‘shooter footage’ we saw was fake (and it surely was). Why they would do that, I don’t know, except as more misdirection (get us arguing). That would be as if Apollo really went to the moon but they decided to show us fake footage (which the footage surely was). It makes little sense. But the PTB are not trying to ‘make sense,’ are they?
The ‘InfoWar’ is more like a riot.
This is Jeffersonian Girl from 153news.net and I’ve exposed just a portion of the NZ fakery, but it’s clearly fake and faker then the Boston Hoaxathon! Max misled his subs on the CGI casings, when he was referencing the casings on the ground that was thrown there but didn’t address the clear cgi fakery of the casings outside vanishing in thin air AND not on the sidewalk! I could only stand about 15 min of max’s Ridiculous rebuttals, but the parts that I heard pissed me off. This is clearly proof Max is controlled opposition, just like Alex Jones! The mudflood fairy tale is enough proof of his tomfoolery, but taking a clear phony fake show and claiming it’s real and people died should be all the evidence your subs need to realize you’re a shill
You’re saying I’m a shill because I said… what? I say that something is ‘not impossible’… is this your rationale? Did you read my post? Or is the agenda behind your dumb ass post to keep the argument going now that Max is neutralized?
I don’t think you, Allan, are the “you” in J-Girl’s post; I think it’s the generic “you”. Unless you have some history with her that I missed?
She was agreeing with you. She is saying Max is the shill.
If that’s the case, fine, but it’s not what the words say, and the context is that she is reacting to my comment saying they could be playing with us by putting out a fake video on top of a real killing. Get us to yell ‘Fake! No one died!’ Then they reveal that people did die, to fuck with us, make us look bad. (Unlikely, yes, but impossible, no.)
SORRY FOR THE DELAY IN POSTING THIS. I’M OVERWHELMED BY SPAM; SOMETIMES I MISS A GENUINE COMMENT.
I know Jeffersonian Girl online well enough to know she means Max is the shill. Her last sentence was meant to be read like this: “…but taking a clear phony fake show and claiming it’s real and people died should be all the evidence his subs need to realize he’s a shill.” – It was just a simple grammar mistake and she was speaking in the first person. Watch her videos on 153.net. She finds some really good stuff sometimes. https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=9X19NWX7K6NO and https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=83WG9NK6SX9D
where’s the good stuff?
Unless you are doing your own forensic analysis of the crime scene then I doubt that you have “exposed” anything. Parsing that video and claiming that it is “a clear phony fake show” does not get us any closer to what actually happened or who is responsible.
And, “shill?”
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Not a well-thought out comment, Miles. I mean, what are you talking about? Do you feel the same about my last Spacex-fraud video? This one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZDF23wcMVo
I’ll grant you that my comment was not well thought out (they rarely are), having been born out of frustration that someone I had never before seen post here was calling you a shill (I still read it that way despite others coming to her defense).
Since I personally don’t know a shill from a LH from a mole (and am astounded how quickly everyone seems to toss those labels around), I choose to believe that some people are independent actors who just happen to have their heads so far up their own asses that they cannot extract themselves from their own opinions long enough to entertain other points of view. So, while I am not prepared to conclude that Max is anything other than an asshole (because I don’t know the full body of his work), his comments here were, in fact, truly confounding.
I do hold my position that finding errors in a video only definitely proves that there are errors in a video. In the case of the NZ shooter it seems that nearly everyone who has actually watched it agrees that it is problematic and is not true documentation of an actual lone-wolf massacre. That the video was faked does not mean that no one was actually killed. Who released that first person video and why is still an open ended question (to my mind). I’m made a little uneasy by the notion that it exists for the benefit of some AI to better learn how to control us, but I fear that you are probably right.
As for your exposing the Space X fakery, there are some differences. For one, no one else seems to be saying anything at all about it (as opposed to NZ). And the videos you are parsing are being presented to the mass public as the actual true accounting, “official story”, of what Space X is doing (is anyone coming forward to say that the NZ video is the “official story” of what happened to those people? – I’m asking, I don’t know). Pointing out the fakery in the Space X videos is exposing something. Although what is still not exactly clear to me. It feels more like a smokescreen for their actual nevarious activities more than just complete and utter fakery…
153news.com? Registered from Germany? That is an awfully convoluted path to the European Union and back to a vpn in the USA? Are you sure that is a legitimate site?
.net I mean.
153news.net is legit. Google blocks it. FaceBook blocks it. Youtube blocks it. So yeah…what more proof does anyone need? Navigation is tedious but the search works ok. Once you know how to get around it’s great because it has many banned videos from YouTube. Banned YT video from the Paulstal Service (channel and website now voluntarily removed because of death threats to his family): https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=UMW398GX8SNS
I’ve been there over a year now. No problems whatsoever.
I’ve pointed people to your video regarding the ‘guides’ in Red. That is an amazing spot! Thats when I stopped listening to the podcast when he spoke about him being a trained killer. I just saw him working with 2 , possibly 3 guides, plus the car outside goes missing when he inexplicably shoots up an empty alley way. I think that was Uncle Alice.
Let me know when you get bored of beating your head against the shills & LHs – and would like some leads toward the grand unified conspiracy theory.
I’m bored of your cryptic messages. Why don’t you drop your grand unified truth bomb already?
Or get off the pot…
Hahaha hah.
I’m bored of it … PLEASE drop your bomb!
As a kiwi who was at chch hospital waiting with someone for operation which was delayed by emergency surgery demands can testify that bloodied injured people looked rather real & if faked dozens of actors were needed just for that bit. The population of the South Island is tiny & the “degree of separation” in NZ is only about 2 (not 6) so connections to dead or injured only slightly obscured by culture difference. So altho i’m not living in chch i have family member & friend who were close enough to hear shooting & see chaos at linwood mosque, 2 friends at hospital as patient & partner, another was a nurse. i’ve heard their stories & i’ve been home 500kms away from the day following, really remote, so… no paid players in my circle yet. Changes to gun laws in NZ don’t need “events”, we’re well-herded here; censorship another issue perhaps – that’s been alarming. So while convenient for our PM – distracted from unpopular capital gains tax proposal & perhaps boosted re-election chances, i do think it really happened rather than faked. Having shot both animals & music videos i also find most doubts raised re the video laughable. Weirdnesses – sure. unlike real life which is never weird, right? Kinda ruined Arthur Brown’s music for me since that was part of the shooter’s playlist – not a ‘convenient coincidence’ that it was playing.
just add re real-life shooting: have witnessed/pulled trigger shots to the head animals small & large; never seen brain splatter or much blood, k? Really close shots too, so no unreality there.
Would you tell us under what circumstances you witnessed head shots as described?
This guy does a good job summing up the video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0ijhkwlmAtjg/
Fake all the way. But it’s possible they faked the video and did kill people. If you have more evidence, please email and comment (allan@banditobooks.com).
This is a potentially important comment — assuming it is genuine, which I will. I’d appreciate it if ‘Mol’ would look into this further, using whatever personal connections possible. Also keep in mind what I said in a former comment:
‘…they could be playing with us by putting out a fake video on top of a real killing. Get us to yell ‘Fake! No one died!’ Then they reveal that people did die, to fuck with us, make us look bad. (Unlikely, yes, but impossible, no.)’
The lack of bullet holes and splatter on the walls and the fact that the people were piled up even before the shooter entered the room (among other things) tells me the video was faked. But as I say, this does not PROVE no one was killed, no matter what JeffersonGirl says.
Looking forward to further comments.
Cheers Allan, i’ll keep my ears (& mind) open for relevant info. i don’t want to review the dubious video (fk whether i’m allowed to or not!!); endless rabbit hole there; my point is simply that a “didn’t happen” scenario would be near impossible to pull off here in NZ; from what I’ve already seen & heard is incredibly unlikely. A ‘LIHOP’ (Let It Happen On Purpose)? Well, that’s pretty cold-blooded.
[Here’s a theory for ya… gun had 14 & a fish symbol like Podesta’s hands in an infamous picture i’ll assume you’re familiar with, Podesta left just before attack after warning NZ “vulnerable to a major cyber-attack”. Now we’re (kinda) disarmed & presumably increased surveillance, police are armed (before they were on occasion apart from Armed Offenders Squad – altho increasingly anyway due to armed criminals). So – is NZ now safe for the Clintons to flee to? i’m pretty sceptical, but hey…]
i’ll just report what i learn, ok?
after more thought i want to add: largely in rebuttal to the ‘no deaths/hoax’ crowd (who are all thousands of miles away from Chch): maybe my eyes could be fooled by the dozens of injured disgorged from a stream of ambulances – i didn’t get close-up; but the worry & concern in hospital staff advising my friend her time-crucial, not emergency but near, operation had to be delayed (& why & the risk concomitant) was not an act. Were they fooled? cos they certainly weren’t paid actors. I’m damn sure not. My friend i’m pleased to say had her op just 24hrs later & is ok. & that stream of real Chch ambulances? Staffed by hundreds of fakers who displaced the real personnel who never mentioned it, then melted into obscurity, all under the eyes of alert armed police? gimme a break.
Definitely a possibility. The video certainly looks fake. But do we have any real “victims” sacrificed in this ritual? We shouldn’t rule that out completely. Still, we should do everything possible to identify and EXPOSE “coincidental” drills and the huge number of “crisis” actors employed in these LARPs.
Re Arthur Brown: That the first audible words (from the car) you could hear upon his approach were ‘I am the god of Hellfire and i bring you… FIRE!’…. sorry, but that sort of 100 to 1 (or 1,000 or whatever) coincidence is just what we’d expect from a PTB op, on top of the lone shoe.
On the package you sent, did you enclose $20 or a check? In my entire life time only three times did a package I sent did not get to its intended destination using USPS. One time was a tedious essay I wrote for continuing education in my profession. Odds heavily favor his having gotten it, opening it, reading it, pocketing the cash, and stonewalling.
However, the other two times packages did not reach their destination, they contained cash Cristmas gifts. I wondered if there is some technology that allow them to spot cash in the mail.
Hope this gets published. I enjoyed this piece very much. If not, your call, so be it. I do that to people too at my blog.
The $20 was folded in the book so I doubt any device could have detected it. (See Max Igan’s comment and my response, when I get around to it…)
Some one sent me this link in an email so I will respond.
Well in regard to your package, I already responded to you once that I am not aware of the package arriving so I don’t really know what else to say…. you described it to me and I didn’t see it here when I returned home from over seas so I don’t really know. It is what it is. And I get literally 100’s of comments and dozens of emails every day so if my response was short, well I least I responded… short does not mean terse… it may also mean tired/busy. And please understand that everything from the crowhouse is a one man effort, with 10 years of abuse for even trying to make a difference so, I do what I can, but I’m 61 now and simply cannot give everyone the attention they demand…
As for Christchurch, well, I don’t really know what to say. So I will offer you this. I worked in the film industry when I was younger. 7 years in set construction and special effects. I have worked on at least ten major films in that capacity. Pitch Black, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Lethal Weapon 2, Babe, Babe 2. That kinda thing. Since then I have made feature length films, countless one hour videos and spent over 10 years working with film editing, motion graphics, CGI animation and photoshop, almost everyday and I can find nothing in the aftermath video that proves it was a rehearsal. Nothing, it all depends on what people want to believe… I see blood all over the place, casings everywhere, and if it was rehearsal, then I guess that one guy with the blue top on leaning against the wall, was practicing having half his brains fall out on his shoulder when he was propped up. And the reality is that I, and anyone else who truly cares to look at the shooters live stream video with a clear and open mind, can disprove every single claim of CGI that has been made, very easily, but of course, I cant show the video because its banned, why? 1. because it reveals it was a black op with multiple shooters and a well coordinated team, and 2. so they can run their fake news meme.
That is how they are going to shut us down… think 3 moves ahead, its so obvious…. Why do you think the CGI claim was made so quickly and took off so well? … accident? or because it was supposed to… Look at the video again… really LOOK it is… that’s all I can ask. And I will continue to believe what I can see and prove for myself… but of course no one wants to listen – and to even attempt to open it up for discussion, instantly generates a chorus of SHILL SHILL SHILL! by default… Even though I have given 10 years of honesty on air, it wont matter, people will believe what they choose to believe, and if some wish to throw me under a bus now for thinking out side their cointel programmed box, which is unfortunately what it is, with truly no insult intended, well, so be it. They are simply walking to their own slaughter.
If people cannot see that the claims of CGI are the false narrative to cover up the real black op, and allow the fake news meme to follow, in order to shut down the independent media, then I cant really help them. But, as I wrote in a recent article, with all the accusations of ‘shill’ that I am hearing and all the accusations that I am somehow ‘supporting the official narrative’. No one has yet explained to me how, by saying this was a govt run black operation with a trained assassin, multiple shooters and real victims, is in any way supporting the official govt narrative of a ‘lone wolf white supremacist’ at all, which is interesting – because I can very easily explain, exactly, how claiming it was all fake and CGI, and accusing anyone who says different of being a shill, supports their agenda precisely…
And still not one single person pushing the CGI meme can offer me anything but “anybody can see and you are an idiot and a shill if you cant” – that’s it, that’s the entire argument… Ok you say its fake. Show me how, and actually show me, don’t give me the ‘anybody can see’ version, just show me, otherwise its like the emperors new clothes… well no sorry, I don’t buy it, the emperor is naked…. but if no one will listen, well I can only do what I can do, and I really don’t care how many people attack me for it. I’m only a small voice, and I will continue to think for myself and say what I see with my own eyes. I don’t really care if it goes against the ‘official alternate media’ narrative…
but you just watch, because if we cannot shut down and expose this completely false ‘CGI all fake no deaths’ narrative and people run with it, this is going to be used to push the fake news meme and shut down the independent media as mindless conspiracy theorists, who don’t care about dead people, we will be portrayed as the type of people who influenced Brenton Tarrant – and then very likely have many of the main speakers such as myself and others arrested as ‘inciters’ and potential ‘terrorists’ … you just watch how this all plays out.
Stay safe everyone
…so now bring on the trolls I guess
BEST IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS IS TO REPRO THE COMMENT AND RESPOND IN BOLD (I AM NOT YELLING). THIS WAY I CAN’T BE ACCUSED OF CHERRY-PICKING.
Some one sent me this link in an email so I will respond.
Well in regard to your package, I already responded to you once that I am not aware of the package arriving so I don’t really know what else to say…. you described it to me and I didn’t see it here when I returned home from over seas so I don’t really know. It is what it is.
MY TIME-FRAME FOR SENDING THE PACKAGE WAS ‘A YEAR OR SO AGO’ WHICH IS VERY VAGUE — COULD BE A YEAR AND A HALF OR WHATEVER, RIGHT? THEN HOW DID MAX KNOW FOR SURE THAT HE’S JUST ‘RETURNED HOME FROM OVER SEAS’?
SOUNDS TO ME LIKE HE REMEMBERS GETTING THE PACKAGE. I MEAN, SOMEONE DOES NOT REMEMBER NOT GETTING A PACKAGE (WITH A BOOK CALLED ‘COSMIC BANDITOS’, ETC.), DO THEY?
BUT MAX REMEMBERS NOT GETTING IT. ODD. UNLESS HE WAS GONE FOR MANY MONTHS. (I SENT MY EMAIL MONTHS AFTER NOT HEARING FROM HIM, AND GIVEN THE ‘100s’ OF EMAILS HE GETS, IT’S ODD IF HE’D SAY HE REMEMBERS MY COMMENT AND RESPONDING TO IT, TOO. THIS WAS ALL MANY MONTHS AGO, MAYBE A YEAR. I DON’T ACTUALLY RECALL. BUT MAX REMEMBERS WHAT HE WAS DOING — WHEN HE DID NOT GET A PACKAGE!)
And I get literally 100’s of comments and dozens of emails every day so if my response was short, well I least I responded… short does not mean terse… it may also mean tired/busy. And please understand that everything from the crowhouse is a one man effort, with 10 years of abuse for even trying to make a difference so, I do what I can, but I’m 61 now and simply cannot give everyone the attention they demand…
THE AGE THING RE MEMORY, ETC., HUH? I’M 71, MAX, JUST FYI.
As for Christchurch, well, I don’t really know what to say.
YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT TO SAY? HOW ABOUT ANSWERING MY BLOG POST? YOU DO NOT DO THAT AT ALL IN YOUR LENGTHY REPLY. NOT AT ALL.
So I will offer you this. I worked in the film industry when I was younger. 7 years in set construction and special effects. I have worked on at least ten major films in that capacity. Pitch Black, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Lethal Weapon 2, Babe, Babe 2. That kinda thing. Since then I have made feature length films, countless one hour videos and spent over 10 years working with film editing, motion graphics, CGI animation and photoshop, almost everyday and I can find nothing in the aftermath video that proves it was a rehearsal. Nothing, it all depends on what people want to believe…
I ASSUME MAX READ MY POST… YET IT’S LIKE HE DIDN’T… SET CONSTRUCTION IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM SPECIAL EFFECTS… YES, I WAS IN THE FILM BIZ TOO, FOR ALMOST 3 DECADES… (BUT THIS IS ALL MISDIRECTION)
MAX SAYS it all depends on what people want to believe. VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE PODCAST, IN WHICH HE REPEATS OVER AND OVER HOW SURE HE IS ETC. I’LL NOT REPEAT MY POST BUT PLS READ IT AND SEE IF MAX’S COMMENT IS EVEN CLOSE TO A RESPONSE.
I DIDNT SAY A WORD ABOUT ‘CGI’ NOR A WORD ABOUT THE ‘AFTERMATH’… DID I? I WROTE ABOUT THE SHOOTER’S VIDEO ONLY, SO MOST IF NOT ALL OF WHAT MAX WRITES IS STRAW MAN MISDIRECTION.
I see blood all over the place, casings everywhere, and if it was rehearsal, then I guess that one guy with the blue top on leaning against the wall, was practicing having half his brains fall out on his shoulder when he was propped up. And the reality is that I, and anyone else who truly cares to look at the shooters live stream video with a clear and open mind, can disprove every single claim of CGI that has been made, very easily, but of course, I cant show the video because its banned, why? 1. because it reveals it was a black op with multiple shooters and a well coordinated team, and 2. so they can run their fake news meme.
CGI, CGI. AGAIN, I SAID NOTHING ABOUT CGI. NOTICE THAT MAX SAYS NOTHING ABOUT THE LACK OF BULLET HOLES AND BLOOD SPLATTER ON THE WALLS, WHICH WAS MY ONLY POINT.
ALSO NOTICE THAT HE SAYS NOTHING ABOUT WHAT I WROTE TO HIM ABOUT, WHICH IS ALT MEDIA MOLES…. THAT IS VERY STRANGE. IN FACT, MAX’S REPLY IS EXACTLY WHAT I WOULD EXPECT TO GET FROM A MOLE — MISDIRECTION (AS I HAVE SHOWN IN MANY OF MY POSTS BY QUOTING OTHER MOLES).
That is how they are going to shut us down… think 3 moves ahead, its so obvious…. Why do you think the CGI claim was made so quickly and took off so well? … accident? or because it was supposed to… Look at the video again… really LOOK it is… that’s all I can ask. And I will continue to believe what I can see and prove for myself… but of course no one wants to listen – and to even attempt to open it up for discussion, instantly generates a chorus of SHILL SHILL SHILL! by default… Even though I have given 10 years of honesty on air, it wont matter, people will believe what they choose to believe, and if some wish to throw me under a bus now for thinking out side their cointel programmed box, which is unfortunately what it is, with truly no insult intended, well, so be it. They are simply walking to their own slaughter.
THE ABOVE IS ALSO CLASSIC MISDIRECTION, WHICH HE DOES IN HIS PODCAST, AS I POINTED OUT IN MY POST: throw me under a bus now for thinking out side their cointel programmed box… THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT IN MY ADDENDUM RE HIS HOSTILITY AND SARCASM.
REPEATING ‘LOOK’ — INSTEAD OF EXPLAINING HOW THE WALLS COULD BE FREE OF BLOOD AND BULLET HOLES. HE’LL GO ON AND ON AND NOTHING IS IN RESPONSE TO MY POST….
If people cannot see that the claims of CGI are the false narrative to cover up the real black op, and allow the fake news meme to follow, in order to shut down the independent media, then I cant really help them. But, as I wrote in a recent article, with all the accusations of ‘shill’ that I am hearing and all the accusations that I am somehow ‘supporting the official narrative’. No one has yet explained to me how, by saying this was a govt run black operation with a trained assassin, multiple shooters and real victims, is in any way supporting the official govt narrative of a ‘lone wolf white supremacist’ at all, which is interesting – because I can very easily explain, exactly, how claiming it was all fake and CGI, and accusing anyone who says different of being a shill, supports their agenda precisely…
I NEVER SAID HE WAS SUPPORTING THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE. AGAIN, READ MY POST AND SEE IF MAX DEALS WITH ANYTHING I WROTE… NOPE…
And still not one single person pushing the CGI meme can offer me anything but “anybody can see and you are an idiot and a shill if you cant” –
HERE WE GO AGAIN REPEATING THE CGI MEME. ALSO NOTICE HOW LONG THIS IS. I NOTICED WITH OTHER MOLES HOW MUCH EFFORT THEY PUT INTO THEIR RESPONSES — PARTLY AS MISDIRECTION….. IF YOU DON’T PAY ATTENTION AND THINK BACK TO WHAT I WROTE, YOU END UP NODDING ALONG WITH A LONG SCREED LIKE THIS ONE, AND FORGETTING TO NOTICE THAT IT’S ALL MISDIRECTION FROM THE QUESTIONS I POSED.
that’s it, that’s the entire argument… Ok you say its fake. Show me how, and actually show me, don’t give me the ‘anybody can see’ version, just show me, otherwise its like the emperors new clothes… well no sorry, I don’t buy it, the emperor is naked…. but if no one will listen, well I can only do what I can do, and I really don’t care how many people attack me for it. I’m only a small voice, and I will continue to think for myself and say what I see with my own eyes. I don’t really care if it goes against the ‘official alternate media’ narrative…
I SUPPOSE THE LENGTH OF THIS COMMENT IS MEANT TO GET US ARGUING AGAINST EACH OTHER, WHICH — AS I SAY IN MY POST – WAS THE AGENDA BEHIND HIS PODCAST. GET US ARGUING WHILE PRETENDING TO SAY ‘DON’T DO THAT.’
but you just watch, because if we cannot shut down and expose this completely false ‘CGI all fake no deaths’ narrative and people run with it, this is going to be used to push the fake news meme and shut down the independent media as mindless conspiracy theorists, who don’t care about dead people, we will be portrayed as the type of people who influenced Brenton Tarrant – and then very likely have many of the main speakers such as myself and others arrested as ‘inciters’ and potential ‘terrorists’ … you just watch how this all plays out.
Stay safe everyone
…so now bring on the trolls I guess
I GUESS HE MEANS ME WITH HIS PARTING SHOT… YOU BE THE JUDGE.
as I said people will believe what they choose.
and yes, I was traveling for 19 months and returned home last july.
and yes I do the podcasts and wrote the comment,
construe it however you choose
Im sorry but I only read the first and last sections after the intro. I dont read all caps posts sorry, I dont read dog latin. it hurts my eyes
have a great day
over and out
Wow, that’s it Max?
You certainly wear no clothes you slimeball! You didn’t answer any of Allan’s questions.
What a dirty bastard you are.
Do you have a ticket?
Todd, I understand your anger. My anger is based on the insult to our intelligences his reply was. Like we’re too stupid to see misdirection right in our faces… (Reminds me of my ‘correspondence’ with Simon Shack at his Clues Forum, when the misdirection was likewise hot and heavy, until he banned me, calling me ‘a Hollywood clown’…)
Re Max’s response that he returned in July after 19 months abroad…. It would be a royal pain in the ass to check but I think I sent him my comment asking if he received my package between last March and June — I’m pretty certain it was not after July. Which means — if Max’s time line is to be taken at face value — he must’ve sent his ‘didn’t get it’ from his travels… which doesn’t make sense, does it?
But I’m only 80-90% sure of this, so we’ll have to give him a pass on the package issue and stick to the misdirection… fine with me.
oh and I knew that I had just returned from overseas when I checked the pile of mail on my table because I had just gotten off the plane. I thought that part would have been pretty straight forward for you. I apologize for attempting to be nice, or for offending your belief system by thinking for my self… I guess I must be a shill for not supporting the official alternate media narrative huh…. ?
its the new buzzword for free thinkers. Oh well. Divide and Conquer is the motto. Your government applauds your participation.
Goodbye
Hey Max: read the first paragraph of my post. See what it says? The details are unimportant once we know that the PTB were behind the shooting. Yet you are the one getting us mired in details. See how NLP works, folks? He’s accusing me of what he does….
Re the package, we’re back to ‘What are the odds that a first class package gets lost in the mail.’ You obviously made arrangements for your mail to be picked up safe and sound… I’m back to about 100 to 1 ball park that it was waiting for you on your table. Which is why you mentioned it. (Did you get a laugh out of my book? Most folks do.).
My blog post wasn’t in all caps and he apparently didn’t read that either. Yet here he is ‘responding’ to it? What’s wrong with this picture?
Allan…..Master Sleuth! INDEED! I so love and respect they way you are able to ferret out the truth after carefully analyzing information and spotting lies and wheedling out the bits of truth hidden in the lies that the PTB and their ilk spew forth! Allan, you are the BEST! THE BEST!
I’m taking the time now to simply sit back and watch, listen (read), and learn from you and many of your bloggers here! Thank you for all you do and all you are!
Blessings and very kind regards to you!
~Kimberlie
Lol, Crowhouse you’re own comment under your video is just ridiculous:
he nailed every shot, didnt not miss even once…. people are saying ‘oh but no shattered windows and walls’ …. ppfft… show me where he was shooting at any?… he nailed every single shot, he nailed the guy running out the front door from down the hall, 3 shots on the fly, nailed the guy escaping through the corner at the front who was sneaking down the footpath, the guy down the alley, the woman out front through that small gap in the fence…. this guy was a well trained assassin
“He nailed every single shot”
What a load of horse dung. I hope they pay you well.
*your
As if we need more info on Max Igan, here it is: https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YHH5Y84M3SAY
You see blood and shell casing everywhere…lol…pathetic Troll…
I saw the shooter video the day it happened and realized it was fake,then when I tried to watch it again on YouTube it had been pulled.
I watched it again from the link from this site and obviously saw even more glaring anomalies.
The thing that has horrified me even more is now Henry Makow has announced that the video is fake itself in other words a fake within a fake or a psyop within a psyop.
I think Makow is controlled opposition or LH in Allan-Speak why? For a number of reasons which I may touch upon in a further email not tonight as it is late and blowing a gale not a problem if you live in a house,however I live on a boat L8ers J
Oh, and to ‘les berger des photons’: don’t worry about it. This is only my opinion. Maybe just give it some thought.
I wouldn’t read your blog and participate if I wasn’t interested in your opinion. Thanks for responding to me. The only hokey thing I caught from Max’s show by myself was the 3rd party eye-witness.
I’m going to listen to his last show again with what you’ve written in mind.
I still remember when I appreciated James Corbett so much.
You say that 3000 people didn’t die on 911. I wouldn’t doubt that a lot of them might have been happy to escape with the cover that they were dead and take new identities. I’m sure u.s. passports under assumed names are for sale at a store near you.
So how many people did die?
Surely 3000 have died since from trying to save the people who didn’t die.
say more on how many died, please.
also wanted to mention that a lost package is not a smoking gun. Did you send it in a way that called for a signature proving it was delivered to max directly? I think I would have done that, but I don’t know how much more it would have cost.
and I just sent an email to max to make sure he sees this.
I never said it was a smoking gun. Try not to cherry-pick, as if Max getting the package or not is the important point here.
I don’t know how many died but way less than 3,000. Evidence of this is all the ‘vic sims’ — do some research on the fake names and altered photos of the victims. Let me know how you do.
Never heard the voice of any family member of any plane victim
Nyet.
It seems not everyone is buying what Max is selling. Some comments from his YouTube vid:
Arman Truth
@thecrowhouse –
Anybody who has military experience in field ops will tell you a shooting with “real” victims will always have crying and screaming in sheer terror from the victims, not silence with no resistance. The whole thing played out like a prank Call of Duty parody. With one loser, the only loser– the white western male as the bad guy.
Mark Mathews
Igan, you are a top level shill. This is obviously a fake hoax shooting. Did you watch the video or are you just going with the media’s narrative?
Mark Hutchinson
@Mark Mathews Spot on.Another hoax like Australian shooting by Bryant.
Shill alert.Unsubscribed.
I’m actually astounded at Max’s comment above, how obvious the misdirection is.
Yeah, the first one you quote is a good point. Also, when the shooter enters the big room, people are ALREADY piled up on either side, waiting to be ‘shot.’ This too is a dead giveaway (so to speak).
After Sandy Hoax, I was talking to a woman I’ll call Target ‘cos she was (is) absolutely of the target audience for that show. She was aghast and outraged at my suggestion that it was a show; how dare I dishonor the memory of those poor dead children, yadda yadda.
I asked her, did she really *prefer* to believe that twenty innocents had been brutally, senselessly slaughtered? I mean, if you really cared about children, wouldn’t you *leap* at any ray of hope that they were actually OK, that there was no murder?
The corkscrewing Target did in order to maintain both her outrage and her self-image was depressingly impressive.
I’d like to ask this Igan guy the same. I know I’d only hear the same sort of screwy justifications, but maybe it would make some lurker, some bystander, sort it out in the privacy of his own mind.
Because reality is whatever you want it to be, right? No, not right. Reality is what it is, even if we can’t agree on it. It either is, or isn’t a hoax. You and that lady don’t get to choose. Bringing in emotionally charged accusations that she preferred them being killed to them not being killed really doesn’t get to the point of whether it is a hoax or not a hoax. It is distracting irrelevant drivel. I imagine she tried to avoid you after that. Good for her.
You’re right, the emotion says nothing about its being a hoax or not. It speaks only to her being entirely shut down to even considering the possibility that it was a hoax. She would rather believe in the deaths of innocents than ever doubt the trustworthiness of The Media. She is indeed one of their targets.
No. That is you reading into it. That is some serious pretzel logic.
You are asking people to not trust history, news, or scientific consensus on what is and isn’t true. So why should they listen to you?
Trust history? Everything you just listed, science, news, and history, is in the pockets of the world banks and the families who control them. And we are supposes to “trust” it?
Go watch some real history EUROPA The last battle
Another good point is the fact that the shell-casings are disappearing into thin air, like in video games. Apart from no Po-Lice rushing to the scene and no screaming was heard, only the annoying background noise. There is SO much wrong with the whole thing in NZ that it should be obvious to most people (but its not) that this concerns yet another planned event. Shortly after the NZ event another event (shooting) took place here in The Netherlands (Utrecht). I am sure that the PTB are testing the sheep herds to see HOW they respond to a total lock down of the city (Utrecht), which actually did happen (the lock down). I am getting SO tired of people repeating stuff from the mainstream lying brigade without looking into the event themselves..brain-dead…
Right..the magical shell casing
Actually, Max does call it a planned event. Where he is wrong and misdirecting us is when he says people died just as we see in the shooter’s video. Sorry, but no blood no holes in the wall is all I need to know the video was fake. (And why were those people in piles even before the shooter walks into the room?)
Remember the agenda: get us arguing about details. My point today is that the ‘Max Igan’ who wrote the above comment is a mole/shill/disinfo agent. Period.
Right people on their stomach in the corner…not moving when the shooterwlk into the room…big stinky piece of BS again
This seems like as good a place as any to drop this-
I’m the president of the shadow government
The grand governor of the federal reserve
Public enemy of the society
The one you cannot see the thirty three degree
Before you call the shot but now it’s our turn
Blow up the system now and tables have turned
Your hidden knowledge you thought I’d never learn
I strike a match and make the whole place burn
I’m the real WMD
I’m your number one public enemy
I’m the one, your runaway slave
I’m the one, the one who got away
Automatic rapid fire
Automatic make me inner danger
Automatic rapid fire
Automatic make me inner danger
Lethal make me lethal, I’m a weapon
Danger make me danger AK-47
Lethal make me lethal, I’m a weapon
Danger make me danger
Cameras that track me
They try to entrap to me
Through shadows I creep
‘Cause I know exactly
The knowledge you keep
I’m the word on the street
I’ve got nothing to lose
The whole World to gain
Slipped out of your noose
Now I’m running your game
I beat the hive
I upset the swarm
Category five
I’m the center of the storm
We not gonna stress
Put me to the test
I strike a match and make the whole place burn
Walk with the angels and me down with wind
Bullet-proof vest and a smith and Wesson
Anybody diss me I gonna teach them a lesson
We not gonna stress
Put me to the test
We not gonna stress
Put me to the test
Walk with the angels and me down with wind
Bullet-proof vest and a smith and Wesson
Anybody diss me I gonna teach them a lesson
We not gonna stress
Put me to the test
We not gonna stress
Put me to the test
Thirty three degree
Thirty three degree
Songwriters: Robert Manuel Garza / Eric Hilton / Archie Steele
33 Degree lyrics © BMG Rights Management US, LLC
https://youtu.be/cCgxqqxE9Y0
You’re welcome 😎
Rhyme check.
The dude in NZ shot in his windshield with a shotgun 4 times and it did’nt make a scratch..then after reloading his shotgun suddenly the winshield broke with the new ammo…this is a phony fake show again…just before enter the mosque you can see 4 people watching him with his shotgun, in his military gear and none of them called the police because after 15 minutes of video of the event no siren can be heard and no cops can be seen too…FYI telling the truth is a revolutionary act more than ever
Max Igan => good insights & observations – I totally agree.
Haven’t given him and many others a time of my day to steal my Qi/Chi/Energy & Time.
Maybe not as much “studying” him as the “energy” he projects…
Most others here must that have “connected the dots” between the “Alt.Media names” and who they Repost/Link to/Interview etc. (…and vice versa – who they don’t)
The majority are interconnected – directly!
Only “difference” is the “Flavor” on HOW they present their take = to satisfy the “audience” with various personality traits that’s following the “Alt.Media community” => delivering the very same “take” to all in “targeted” ways.
Blatant examples:
– The “X”-CIA/NSA/’In the Know’ etc. “whistleblowers” – quite a few “suicided” or died the “triple-agencies ‘Protocol-deaths’… ” but to many Thrive in the Alt. community…
ditto for
– The “X”-Satanists… Most also Thriving and regularly on “shows” etc.
“X” implies…
Yep!
Addendum
Also, I personally concluded the below over the decades.
Have focus on “their” agenda = final outcome.
Meaning:
– Do not get stuck nor divided (= conquered) to much on the more frequent “Distractions”.
– See these “steps” for what they are and relate them to the final outcome = where are we now and What are the “Solutions” (= usually many) presented.
Then file it upstairs and move on.
– Remember the History which is now blatantly rewritten to achieve the agenda(s)
Etc.
Keep Balance and “consume” just as many Positive things for Mind-Body-Spirit to be in Harmony! (Psychopath’s can’t cope w. this and definetely not reach their final outcome!)
Please make your comments clearer. Write in simple declarative sentences, so we know what you are saying. I don’t have the time to try to parse your prose.
Also, the parrot is not dead, it is just resting.
Beware the bot that just quotes, and posts twice in the same minute…
In other words, I’d like to return this fucking parrot, asshole.
“Well—the gravity. . . is light again today,” Wilbur writes in his memoir. On days of light gravity, all males have erections, and lovers build a pyramid of large rubble at the intersection of Broadway and Forty-second Street. When the gravity is heavy, men crawl about on all fours, and the insides of horses fall out. Heavy gravity first struck when Wilbur Swain was fifty, and had just learned that his sister had died in an avalanche on Mars:
“An extraordinary feeling came over me, which I first thought to be psychological in origin, the first rush of grief. I seemed to have taken root on the porch. I could not pick up my feet. My features, moreover, were being dragged downward like melting wax. The truth was that the force of gravity had increased tremendously. There was a great crash in the church. The steeple had dropped its bell. Then I went right through the porch, and was slammed to the earth beneath it. . . . In other parts of the world, of course, elevator cables were snapping, airplanes were crashing, ships were sinking, motor vehicles were breaking their axles, bridges were collapsing, and on and on. It was terrible. “
THX 1138 Movie. They say, well some say , the controllers always show us what lies ahead for our future. I figure they have known since the 40’s or 50’s and at the same time they knew large amounts of money would be required to complete the task. They are going underground when that moment in time arrives and everyone else is not invited to their party. In a way perhaps it’s better not knowing then knowing ? I’m stuck on this point but I have tried to explain the science both written & verbal to various people & the results are generally under productive since the social engineering clicks in and it’s the end of the line .
So, THX 1138 , did the movie foretell ? Maby , Maby not ! The planet & us are in for a hell of a ride . Ray
Ray…
At This Point it almost seems better to be ignorant of the whole bloody mess…Ignorance is Bliss!
or…
t\They are really heavily fluoridating the water here!
Awh, where ignorance is bliss, tis folly to be wise!
“the controllers” — really?
Clearly there are beings on this planet with too much power and too little empathy. They are either aliens, in which case all bets are off, or they are human cusses like the rest of us.
If human, calling them “the controllers” panders to their egos and demoralizes everyone else. This serves them, whoever they are.
I am frustrated with the view that “they” are controlling, directing things. It credits them with superhuman powers of cooperation and coordination, and a godlike mastery of the Law of Unintended Consequences — while carrying out some of the stupidest, least effective nefarious plots against normal people.
NZ — why did “they” make such a sloppy job of it? If they are superhumanly masters of deception, that’s hard to explain. If they (the ones involved in this specific event) are just human, maybe they were rushed. By what? I can’t know but this wouldn’t be the first time Q has faked a countdown that triggered an attempt to hijack the news.
They know that only 1% will manage to piece things together and that few will listen to them because it will sound like nonsense to them.
It’s my belief that we are the aliens (they were here first). Well, more accurately we are hybrids of two different races of beings, and they are very much at home here while trying to manipulate us and shape us into willing slaves.
https://youtu.be/Jwaw24W2bW0
They’re not being terribly successful at that “willing slave” thing. Wouldn’t it be simpler to do some brain implant on, or inject nanobots into, every hospital-born infant? Or are they not *that* technologically sophisticated yet?
That’s the kind of thing I mean when I say they’re credited with awesome powers bundled together with bloody stupid plans.
The Fall to the curb from the sidewalk is just scratches… from the penthouse its lethal……
Nice, very Kurt V but why?
Some people seem to be commenting simply b/c they can. Don’t do that, please.
I’ve not come across the site before. Interesting stuff. Can you direct me to the James Corbett link you mentioned. Why you think he is not who he seems to be. I enjoy some of his stuff but he has a huge profile so always worth to check it out.
I made a comment on the Burning Blogger of Bedlam that this seems a strange event that seems designed to divide. Thanks.