Max Igan’s ‘Independent Analysis’

I wanted to avoid a debate on the details of the New Zealand shooting(s), for the simple reason that the PTB want us to

get tied up in details and argue amongst ourselves, when, in the big picture, the details are unimportant, assuming we

agree on the simple truth that the shootings (real or not) were the work of the PTB. If this is not your view, please move on from this blog and do not leave comments.

We can learn something, however, even if I’ve said it before, which is that most if not all the ‘name’ alt media outlets are PTB moles. Few of the alt media (if any) voice my observation in the opening paragraph; most dive into the details and are quite adamant.

As of right now, the last two comments from ‘Poof Goes the Airgun’ are from ‘le berger des photons’ and ‘Todd.’ The former brings up Max Igan’s take on the shootings, agreeing with Max…

Please look at Max Igan’s take on this.

He believes that people are actually dead, why would the people who did this make an effort to save lives of sheeple?

He makes a lot of valid points, explains plausibly why we wouldn’t see blood, though not for a head-shot.

Remember we’re all on the same side, or we should be.

…while Todd points out….

NLP is riddled in his monologue, not as good a Corbett. He attributes the missing gore to… wait for it…. wait for it… low resolution and bandwidth! How funny those disappearing or missing evidence (blood, guts, etc.) ONLY applies to the gore and the relevant meat of the situation.

Todd’s comment almost makes this current post unnecessary. He is 100% correct, IMO.

So what’s the takeaway? First, a tiny bit of history between Max Igan and me: A year or so ago I had been listening to Max and liked his analyses on HTWRW so I thought I’d try to verify that Max is in fact one of us, and not a ‘deep’ mole of the PTB. I sent him a package (via snail mail) containing a signed copy of Cosmic Banditos, a DVD of Water Time, and $20 cash, plus a letter wherein I voiced my concern that most of the alt media are moles; I told him that James Corbett was my first real tell, and included a link to my Corbett post (among other links). I went on, naming names, and so forth, particularly regarding the ‘Secret Space Program’ crew; my experiences with them. No need to repeat all that here, but I did point out that ‘space travel’ is of particular interest with PTB fakery. I sent him my early proofs that Musk/NASA is another fraud.

I mentioned (in my letter) the fact that all the important Apollo hoax exposers have this in common: They get their fans distracted and obsessed with Apollo, meanwhile never mentioning the current frauds. These names are on my ‘alert list,’ i.e., Bart Sibrel, Jarrah White (who severely regretted getting smart-ass with me), Marcus Allen, David Percy, and one or two others I’m blanking right now. No matter. See how simple it is? Sure, folks, Apollo was a hoax! But don’t let’s talk about star visibility in NASA imagery and obviously CGI-ed ISS footage… you get the picture.

I assumed that Max did too. I didn’t hear back from him so I left a comment on one of his videos asking if he got my stuff, my book, DVD, 20 bucks and letter. Max replied tersely: ‘Never got it.’ Well, what are the odds that my little package got lost in the mail between here and Oz (cost me $25 and a lot of paperwork to send it!)? We’re not talking about some shit hole Third World country here. I checked the address I’d used and it was correct. Whaddya think? One in a hundred that a first class package gets lost? Something like that.

Odds are that Max was lying when he said he never received it. Odds are that Max didn’t want to get into a discussion about alt media moles. Same deal with my ‘alert list.’ They all (or almost all) know that any response is a lose-lose deal, since my evidence is pretty much inarguable, and given the staggering implications of the frauds I expose. (Watch this half million pound chunk of aluminum/titanium vaporize in 5 seconds in front of eyewitnesses and explain how it was done.)

As Todd obviously did, listen to Max’s podcast on the NZ shootings. Notice how utterly, completely, 100% sure Max is that the shooting was ‘real’ (people died). Boy is he sure! Me, I’m not so sure. I’m 80 – 90% sure that it was faked (like Boston or Sandy Hook), but not sure sure, like Max.

‘I do not for a second believe that the event was a hoax and that people did not die.’ Really, Max? ‘There were real bullets, real blood, real dead people.’ Keep in mind he’s telling us this based on the shooter’s footage, in which, according to Max, ‘the bandwidth was so bad’ that you couldn’t see bullet holes and blood on the walls.

Addendum: Max gets really sarcastic when he says, ‘All they have to do is stage one event (his emphasis) like Sandy Hook, and everyone jumps on the bandwagon and believes every event thereafter is a hoax (no deaths)’… notice how he’s dripping with scorn for us idiots that ‘jump on the bandwagon.’ Well, Max, Sandy Hook wasn’t the only event of that sort, was it? Boston? Just about any event with a lone shoe image, actually. Yes, Todd, Max isn’t as subtle as Corbett, but he’s giving it a shot. (In case you haven’t noticed: When people are trying to lie to you in the face of the facts, they tend to use sarcasm and implied scorn if you disagree.)

Notice how many times Max repeats the words ‘Think about it, folks!’ words to that effect. Over and over, ‘Think!’ then he’ll say something like ‘Why wouldn’t they kill those people?’ Then he gets us nodding along with him as he tells us what bastards the PTB are, how they killed 3,000 on 9/11 (which isn’t even true) so why not kill those Muslims? Then ‘Think about it, folks!’

Well, Max, I was thinking, and wondering why they didn’t kill all those people at the Boston Bombing (100% faked, see Dave McGowan’s work, etc.) or Sandy Hook or half the shootings in Europe?

‘Why would they use crisis actors?’ Max asks us, with rhetorical subtext. ‘Think about it, folks!’

Why do they ever use crisis actors, Max? Do you actually have a point here? I think not.

What Max is doing is tweaking the arguments, the divisiveness, between us with the details of what exactly happened in New Zealand, meanwhile telling us not to do that!

‘Don’t fall into the divide and conquer trap,’ Max tells us, while giving us a shove in exactly that direction.

And so it goes. (Yeah, Kurt is one of my literary heroes.)

I’ll not argue the case for a complete fraud (as opposed to a mind controlled but real assassin), except to agree with Todd, who finds it ridiculous that Igan blames just about every anomaly in the shooter’s footage on ‘low bandwidth.’ Yes, low bandwidth might ‘erase’ a bullet hole (on the wall, say) in one or two frames of tape, but it doesn’t erase them all in every frame. And the idea that there would be no holes or blood splatter on the walls behind the two piles of bodies, is, as I say, all I need to know.

I guess my point today is a simple one. If you are a fan of Max Igan, listen to his podcast and ask yourself, ‘What is the takeaway here?’

For me it was Gin up divisiveness while pretending to warn against it.

If you’re wondering why all the slight-of-hand with people giving different opinions (be they moles or not) and all the shouting and arm waving about what happened… this is largely to provide more data for the A.I. algorithm that’s keeping track of who is believing what and what they do upon coming across new information (like Max’s podcast, say). To the monster A.I. (at Langely/Fort Meade/Tavisock/wherever) all this nonsense is really valuable grist for its predictive mill.

Allan

Regarding NLP (my simple definition thereof), listen to what is repeated over and over and how that idea is framed, and you will understand what is really being said.

Oh, and to ‘les berger des photons’: don’t worry about it. This is only my opinion. Maybe just give it some thought.

Last addendum: According to Max, Vinny Eastwood’s sister knows someone who died at Christchurch. Make of that what you will, regarding Vinny.