Note: I’ve taken Doctor Cowan’s name off my titles for reasons that should be obvious to most of you. However, since I wrote the following for Cowan’s benefit, I’ll leave it pretty much as is, I.e., as if written to him. If he comes across it, maybe it will stir up some guilt, or something.
I assume many of my subscribers are familiar with what follows, i.e., the sun/moon/earth numbers (from 2018), but even if so, the subject is of such profound implications that a bit of repetition is in order. What good is truth not properly imprinted? (I’ve read The Invisible Rainbow twice, and listened to it once; I’ve read your The Contagion Myth at least twice.)
The universe is either a slew of miracles or design, as you will learn from this post.
Anyway, Doctor Cowan (and anyone reading this) if the following info doesn’t make you sit up and take notice, either you’re not really thinking, or I myself have my head up my ass (or both). The following is based on two posts from 2018, reworked, plus some new stuff.
#
In August of 2917 I my dog Gus and I made our way up the Oregon coast for the total eclipse that took place on the 21st. We got there a few days early and found a spot to camp right on the center line of totality.
This is a negative blow up of a photo I did of the August 21, 2017 totality.
The experience (of totality) wound up changing my way of seeing certain aspects of HTWRW. I’ll not try to explain this other than to say that at the moment when darkness fell — and it falls as if a cosmic light switch had been thrown — it was as if someone yelled in my face, ‘Look up here! Think about it!’
Which I did.
Chance & Necessity
Say you flip a coin and it comes up heads. That’s chance, right? (Although Newton’s Laws of Motion are involved, we’re dealing with probabilities here.)
Say you flip a coin ten times and it comes up heads each time. Could still be chance, right? Yes, but you’d be starting to wonder if something else was up.
A lunar eclipse I witnessed at the Grand Canyon in 2015. It didn’t have the profound effect of the solar of 2017.
Say you do it 100 times and it comes up heads each time. (Call this ‘the event.’) Now you know something’s up. You suspect that it’s either a two-headed coin or some other shenanigans are going on. And if so, you know there is an intelligent agent of some sort behind the event (100 heads in a row). To put it another way: If the outcome had been approximately 50 – 50 (heads/tails), you would assume the event occurred via the natural law of probability. This can be referred to as necessity. You could also say that this event (approx. 50 heads, 50 tails) was based on chance. What you would not suspect — no reason to — is that there is some sort of intelligent agent behind this event.
Any event will either be caused via natural laws (necessity) and/or via random chance. If neither is the case we have intelligence in the woodpile. Get it?
No?
I staged this photo the night of the lunar eclipse…
Think of something that isn’t either chance or necessity (or both) and you will always come up with an intelligent agent of some sort as the cause. (Keep in mind that with ‘the event’ we are not dealing with Newton’s Laws of Motion, but with Probability.)
I hope you agree here, because this is the crux of the matter I am espousing.
How We Got Here
You are likely aware that for complex life to exist on earth, a moon very much like the one we have is necessary. (You can look up the reasons.) And the unlikeliness the moon’s physical existence (due to its size, make up, plus the mechanics of its orbit) has been long argued by the scientific community. In fact, you may know that the moon’s existence is so unlikely that artificiality is not a new theory.
But let’s be way, way conservative and say that the moon’s existence is comparable to the above-mentioned 10 heads in a row. Unlikely but not impossible. This is in fact the mainstream science view. (Actually, the chances are probably more like one in a billion, but we’re giving the materialists all kinds of breaks.)
As you also know, it’s already a monumental coincidence that the moon is exactly the apparent size of the sun, making total eclipses like the one I saw possible – the moon being 400 times smaller in diameter yet 400 times closer to us than the sun.
This situation is comparable in probability to the 100 heads in a row, yet the mainstream view is still that chance is behind it. (This is certainly another one in a billion shot, but as I say… etc., etc, plus we now have two one in a billion chances to deal with, i.e., multiply by each other…)
Addendum: This is as if the astronauts in 2001; A Space Odyssey found the monolith on the moon and muttered, ‘Wow, what a wild coincidence that the natural laws of chemistry and geology created this thing! Now pass the artificial ham sandwich.’
Thing is, though, we haven’t even gotten started with the ‘coincidences,’ with the battle between chance & necessity and design.
There’s an excellent book called The Privileged Planet, by Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards (an astronomer and a philosopher, respectively), both being from the Discovery Institute (which espouses intelligent design), and their premise is indeed that the universe was created been by an intelligent designer, and part of their evidence is that we get full solar eclipses. Yes, I agree.
But an added coincidence — somehow not mentioned in the book — is the number itself, 400. A ‘round’ integer in base 10 arithmetic. What are the odds? Not only that but the ‘canon’ of the number ‘400’ is on its own significant: 400 is the number of kilometers the moon turns on its axis each earth day… 400 is the number of times the earth turns faster than the moon…40,000 is the number of Megalithic Yards in one Megalithic second of arc of the sun… 40,000 is also the number of kilometers the earth turns on its axis each day…
I know: Units of measurement are, in theory, arbitrary, i.e., human conventions, so cannot have ‘cosmic’ significance. Maybe, maybe not, though, since both the Megalithic Yard and the metric system are related to – and probably based upon — the circumference and the mass of the earth. This in spite of the fact that the Megalithic Yard was ‘invented’ (or ‘discovered’) around 6,000 BC, begging the question of how the hell anyone knew the earth’s dimensions 8,000 or so years ago. Were our ancestors ‘enlightened’ by… well, a higher power? More on this in a bit.
Oh and here’s still another reason ‘400’ is significant: the meter was geodetically defined as one forty-millionth (1/40,000,000th) of the earth’s polar circumference.
Do you believe that all these ‘400’-related numbers are coincidences? If not, then by definition you believe in some kind of ‘higher intelligence/power.’ This is not logically arguable. 
Still more evidence: Here are just a few of the numbers involving the sun: 109.2 is the size ratio of the earth to the sun; 109.2 is also the number of earth diameters across the sun; and 10,920 is the size of the moon in kilometers. 27.322 are the sidereal days for one lunar orbit; 27.322 is also the percentage size, earth to moon.
As you can see, there is no physics-related reason whatsoever that these numbers should match (they do not match ‘by necessity’).
And anyone who would believe this is all coincidence, i.e., chance, is not a ‘philosopher’ in any true, ‘follow the evidence,’ sense of the word.
If i
t’s not chance or necessity, then ‘intelligence’ is at work. But more than intelligence, there is ‘interest,’ in us, our ‘progress,’ and our behavior. Not only interest, but meddling. How else to explain how ‘stone age’ builders knew the earth’s dimensions and mass?
(’Curiosity’ would certainly fit with a ‘simulation hypothesis’ (see Bostrom and others), since we should assume that the simulators share at least some intellectual properties with us. Another way to put it: Without curiosity about us, why run a simulation?)
One more example. Is the number 366 important, cosmologically? Sure it is. It’s the number of earth rotations in one solar year. But so what? Well, in relative size the earth is also 366 per cent larger than the moon. This, too, is an ‘unnecessary’ match, i.e., it is not due to necessity. And if you believe it’s due to chance… well, you are… not thinking clearly.
Therefore, we’re talking about design.
Also, take the number 100, divide it by 366 and you get… 27.322. Look familiar? It’s the number of sidereal days (rotation of the earth re the fixed stars) for one lunar orbit (see above)! Holy shit! As a capper: for every 10,000 days on earth, the moon makes 366 orbits around us! Does ‘coincidence’ cause these ‘landings’ on round base 10 numbers?
There is nothing ‘cosmic’ about base 10. But the perfection only works in it! How did ‘it’/‘they’ know we’d use it?
Well, we have 10 fingers and toes, right? Is base 10 a reaction to that? If so, did the higher power arrange it, evolutionarily?
Evolutionary biologists are at a loss as to how the Cambrian Explosion happened. How did all those body plans appear out of nowhere? Were they plopped down by the same higher power that slung a perfect moon in orbit around us?
Just a reminder of what we’re in for. (The next extinction event is overdue.)
Again (this is worth a repeat), the big question is How did the higher power know we’d use the metric system and Megalithic Yards? The only rational answer is this: It/he/she/they, the higher power, meddled with with our development to ensure that we would use these systems of measurement, as was done with base 10, starting with us having ten digits to count on (notice that a synonym for ‘finger’ is ‘digit’) .
Even a ‘second’ of time is not a convention but rather is tied to the earth’s gravity, as measured by a pendulum in conjunction with the movement of celestial bodies. (Fascinating stuff!)
For me – and given my research into biological evolution’s ‘impossible coincidences’ – what all this equals is that the nature of the ‘intelligent designer’ may not be so far afield from that of we humans. A scary thought!
The Problem of Organized Religion
What is wrong with the mainstream science (plus the authors of The Privileged Planet) that they mention none of these numbers, and their implications? The proof is right in front of them! Not only proof of a designer’s existence, but proof that he/she/it wants us to know of his/her/its existence!
But see, they’re either materialists (science) or Christians, the former ruling out design via their premise (their religion), the latter via the God of the Old Testament (their religion), who would not work that way. See, we’re supposed to believe in God via faith alone. They don’t need or want no stinkin’ proof!
Sacred Geometry should be enough to prove design but since it is purely mathematical, it’s paid little attention. I highly recommend Randall Carlson’s lecture on YT: A whole other angle on design.
Addendum: Anyone curious about the Megalithic Yard and what is so amazing about it can go to Butler and Knight’s Civilization One, plus their Who Built the Moon, although you will also have to put up with quite a bit of mainstream nonsense when they wander off the subject of metrics and the sun/moon/earth numbers, the worst of which can be summed up by their ‘reasoning’ in proof of the Apollo moon landing.
Given the subject matters at hand, that they completely ignore the UFO phenomenon is also an annoyance at best, as is their total acceptance of germ theory.
And don’t get me started on their climactic notion that the moon was built by time traveling humans from the far future.
Still, a reminder: If it ain’t Chance… And if it ain’t Necessity… It’s Intelligence!
Doctor Cowan, don’t the ‘the moon numbers’ prove (to any reasonable person) the existence of a real higher power? One that has monkeyed with our existence? And as I’ve said before about other subjects: Why isn’t this big news?
Addendum: A final thought on why this evidence is so much more profound than, say, Sacred Geometry, which is wholly based on mathematics. See, the moon/sun/earth relationship is physical, i.e., based on… on ‘miracles’ (impossibilities) involving physical matter. Wow.
Allan
And let’s remember the quote that got us started down this road:
‘We’ll know our disinformation campaign is successful when everything the American public believes is wrong.’
William Casey (Director of Central Intelligence under Reagan)
One other thing: The Mandela Effect is… real (whatever that means). How to explain this, other than by design?
Just recalled that stars are disappearing and ‘scientists’ have no idea why. How about a cosmic version of the Mandela Effect? Click here and see if you have a better explanation.
But my point being: ‘They’ don’t want us to know anything.
One last thing. Here’s a short film I made about the lunar eclipse I witnessed at the Grand Canyon in 2015. It reflects the spookiness of any eclipse, although a total solar is in another realm.
Isaiah 40:26
Lift up your eyes on high: Who created all these?
He leads forth the starry host by number;
He calls each one by name.
Because of His great power and mighty strength, not one of them is missing
In the beginning was the word, and the word was with god, and the word was god. The same was in the beginning with god. All things were made by him; and made without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light that shineth in the darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
His name Is Yahoshua Hamashiac/ Jesus the Christ/Redeemer/Messiah/Emmanuel
God’s name is actually ‘Jealous’, according to the Bible. His NAME, not just a description. Check it out:
https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=jealous&version=KJV
Keep this in mind before you take HIS name in vain. and so forth.
Physics has discovered that the ‘Higgs boson’ called the ‘God-particle’ photon is the last particle element to be discovered that formulates matter. BUT, it is controlled by a ‘hidden invisible Force’ yet to be discovered (it’s always something). https://home.cern/science/physics/higgs-boson
Maybe our DNA is being changed to accommodate the Force. In other words, we are being forced to evolve to understand we can become good and capable of god-like creations. Are we coming back in time to rid ourselves of the nasties? Will we then have, with what remains, the ability to understand those differences without becoming nasty? We do know fishing and Joy to the World.
The endearing dialogue may-the-force-be-with-you seems deeper than its original mystical meaning in Star Wars. Is ‘THE Power That Be’ the good Creator? If so, how do we get to our Maker this message – we don’t like the not knowing and the pain and suffering that we have to endure psychically and consciously in this body.
Is this life a test on separation? Are we trying to separate the wheat from the shaft to become perfect to live forever? Are we living forever already and sentimentally ‘tripping out’ here for a while in this vulnerable adrenalin-ridden nitty-gritty.
Kenny Rogers, First Edition, Just Dropped In
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meJP410N9Gg
We innately know there’s a power guiding everything. Uncovering the secrets will require the conscious to be able to be open to accept the other side and go there. People have out-of-the-body experiences. We exist there too.
Psychedelic drugs years ago turned our heads around. We incidentally found out we are much more than anyone told us we were. Some of those drugs are now medically accepted for use in depression and mental illness. Who da thunk? Endless possibilities abound, beyond even photons and quarks.
We are Spiritual. We are affected by matter and other invisible realms. It seems there are evil spirits and Holy Spirits.
In adventures and discoveries, may the ‘Holy Force’ be with you.
GOD is LOVE …
.
.
.
LOVE IS THE UNIFIED FIELD……
Jesus spoke everything into existence where the resonance/frequency of LOVE turning photons into matter…… 😉 Aloha
Ayahuasco is the one I’d like to try. Meet some kids from the other side. maybe learn something.
Allan, if I was loaded and had the time, and you had someone to mind your house & dogs, – I would love to take you to see those Shaman Indians in Peru!. (be my shout).
It is a life changing/mind blow out/learning experience.
Did you know even Joe Rogan can’t stop talking about DMT?….
Here is a very nice little clip he made way back (before he got bought by the NWO)….
https://youtu.be/wNLxoEz2tE4
Only draw back is, the brew makes you throw up, or the scitters LOL!
OT:
http://mileswmathis.com/maria.pdf
I have to smile when ‘MM’ mentions me/insults/lies/etc., b/c all it does is alert people to my open letter to him, which can only hurt the op. I also have to laugh listening to his ‘slight Texas twang’ as he uses Britisms like ‘shite’, ‘ten penny’ and so on.
Out of curiosity, what is your recollection (if any) of the phone conversation mentioned between you and MM?
That was a lie. I never spoke to him. I emailed and said I was interested in exposing alt media moles and linked him to my Corbett Open Letter. And that was that. He wanted nothing to do with me.
Lol! – you are quite famous and made a huge impression on this MM person, Allan! 😀
I read the whole article, and nowhere does MM mention HOW LONG it takes him to write things!.
I was very highly amused and entertained, when MM compared himself to BRAD PITT! a few years ago LOL!
Anyone – Ask yourself this – why didn’t the person meeting MM describe his physical APPEARANCE at all??.
All the proof anyone needs, all around them, to prove the existence of a higher intelligence & creator – the truly mind blowing FLAGELLA MOTOR (Bacterium tail spinner)…..
– > https://youtu.be/MNR48hUd-Hw
THANKS!
I never heard of it.
Yep, on the bio level that’s the poster boy.
WOW … Thank you Allan and Voo … Allan, your explanation helped me to understand and even grasp in my limited capacity things I had never given much thought to. It really does put a lot of things in context for me. But then, I read the comments and am once again thrown into chaos and confusion … Voo ” I just know it’s being perpetuated and makes no sense whatsoever other than “someone” or “something is manifesting Chaos and Confusion on this planet on a scale never seen before in human history.” Also, I am still unable to grasp the Mandella Effect.
That’s just the way of the mandela effect. You are quite certain that you had it all figured out yesterday, but since you woke up this morning you are bewildered by it.
bingo!!!! I love it! (not the Mandela Effect but your reply!) And your icon name. genius
sorry!!! lol just being honest from a personal viewpoint.
didn’t mean to sway you from calm to confusion in one setting….gulp
My personal experience is quite serious. Involving a famous murder case. I was in the house where the murder took place one week before it happened. It was a benefit party for a good cause. I was there with two friends, one of whom I worked for as a legal secretary. The shock of that terrible crime (an entire family) traumatized me for years. It was burned into my brain and discussed muchly with my friends, afterwards and recently with others who remembered it in detail. Now I find out it happened 8 yrs later when neither of those friends were even in my life and I wasn’t even working at the law office or living anywhere near the murder scene. It is Impossible! Try to wrap your head around that!!!! whew. That’s the Mandela Effect in a nutshell. You remember every detail of something that you are now being told NEVER HAPPENED! (Like…Luke, I am your father. NOOOoooooooo!!!!) And yes, the lion does lay down with the lamb I don’t care what anybody says!!!!! lol lol
Regarding the Mandela Effect, and the lion laying with the lamb. I find it ironic that random people, who don’t study the bible, lets alone believe anything in it, suddenly proclaim the text has changed. I found this that counters the argument that what is written in Isaiah 11:6 is not what has always been there. https://william-branham.org/site/blog/20180130_apology_and_correction_-_the_lion_shall_lay_down_by_the_lamb
Brian, I graduated from two Bible Schools. I know the Bible, most all translations. I know
when something has been added to or taken away from and woe to those that do so! I also heard the old covert recording back in the day on which some muckedy muck was boasting about how “They” were going to change the Bible so cleverly and subtly that it would take time to realize it and that eventually the newer generations would just consider it an old fairytale book! I feel sorry for those that mess with that two-edged sword. Yikes! lol I heard the most amazing quote the other day…”You can read a book but the Bible is the only book that can read you.” I love that.
Great description of the ME! And of course it was the lion. the link Brian gives us does nothing but repeat the facts of the matter, a frequent way to fool people about…. any lie or op… People read it and nod, not disagreeing with anything..,. except the premise/conclusion.
People quote studies about how fallible human memory is, but don’t go near the studies that show that when more than one person testifies to something, no matter how unlikely, the results are the opposite, i.e., what they say is likely to be true. And with each person that agrees, there is an exponential drop in the odds that they are all wrong. It’s virtually impossible (statistically) that everyone who remembers Isaiah 11:6 (sorry for my error before) is remembering improperly.
The denial that the Bible is changing is simply based on good old cognitive dissonance.
Here’s one of my posts on the ME and the lion/wolf issue”
http://blog.banditobooks.com/the-amish-effect/
As the cells in our brains die, the information is transferred to newer cells, but not perfectly. It is a kind of revisionist memory of the original, sometimes with errors in vaguely remembered or not well known details. Also, when things are misquoted over and over on tv and in the general populous, the mistakes are remembered better than the reality. For example, Sex And The City was constantly misspoken as Sex In The City, and in spanish speaking countries the name was changed to that. Another example is Berenstain Bears, which everyone just assumed was Berenstein Bears, because the other spelling is weird.
I’ll soon do a reminder of the Mandela Effect so hang in. There is some new stuff to consider, the ‘star disappearances’ being one.
Look forward to more deep dive exploration into ME. Appreciate you mentioning both sacred geometry and Randall Carlson. Cymatics is an progression of following sacred geometry a little deeper, imo. Have you explored cymatics at all?
Yes, and it’s worth everyone’s attention:
https://www.delamora.life/cymatics/
Replying to:
—
Allan Weisbecker
March 9, 2022 at 10:32 pm
ru and brett: i dunno and hate to agree with MS science but…. ru, I am not following your logic, or maybe it’s me. the link Brett gave seems to agree with me, as does any google search. do you have a link that explains what’s up with this?
—
Hello Allan,
I don’t have a link to hand as I haven’t studied the issue for while. I will try to explain in my own way:
All rotation has an axis.
Rotate a bicycle wheel and the wheel axle is the axis of rotation.
Glue a golf ball to the tyre/tire and rotate the wheel. The axis of rotation of the golf ball is the the same as the rest of the wheel.
Then cut away all the wheel except for a couple of spokes etc holding the golf ball in place. Rotate. The axis of rotation has not changed.
Now cut away the remaining wheel to sever the physical link with the axle, but maintain the exact same position and movement of the golf ball, rotating around the axle, by using an invisible force such as as magnetism or gravity etc.
The axis of rotation of the golf ball is still on the original wheel axle. The golf ball has not suddenly started to turn on its own axis.
You do understand that everyone in science (at any level) disagrees and would say of course the moon rotates. and I can’t think of a reason why they would lie about this. on the other hand, space itself may not be what we’re told, so…. the whole matter may be moot.
I doubt anyone is lying about it. The majority are merely repeating what they have been told, and others won’t entertain ideas that don’t fit the narrative of the ‘scientific consensus’.
It seems to be important to the majority that the moon must rotate on its own axis, so i guess that other aspects of cosmology are dependent upon that happening.
Alan, I witnessed a total solar eclipse in Winnipeg, Manitoba, back in 1979. I was stunned as – just a few seconds from totality – a very dark shadow came tearing across the landscape from west to east, followed by totality. Even though all of us understood the science of what was happening, we were all shivering…and it wasn’t the February cold…it was something else. For me I think it was a connection to my deep past…a visceral link to the wonder and yes, terror, that our ancestors must have felt as they bore witness to this same event (sans modern man’s ‘science’ tho explain this phenomenon). It was as though what was happening in front of my eyes, triggered a genetic memory.
I remember feeling very small, filled with wonder, and elated at the same time. Those shivers are still just a heartbeat away…
Exactly, yes. I have never read (nor written) a description that does justice to the effect of a total solar eclipse. I’m glad you understand this as well. Anyone who can should do whatever it takes to experience one. 2024 I think is the next one in the USA. Texas and on up. Look it up and be there. I will, if I am able.
Allan,
Wonderful post. Regarding Christianity and HTWRW, I’d love for you to view Israel Anderson’s work. I grew up Christian, became disillusioned about the inconsistencies and his work has really spoke to me. Start here https://youtu.be/UoEorNACwmA
About and hour into it I realized my neck muscles were sore from head shaking, which is common when I listen to folks who take the Bible as ‘God’s word’ and seek to enlighten me as to What It Means. I usually wind up thinking about the non-virgin who should be stoned to death at her father’s door and so forth and so on.
Perhaps you are not disillusioned enough?
By the way, are you familiar with Isaiah 16, Wherein the lion lays down with the lamb? If so, look it up in an actual Bible.
Fair enough!
Good on you Allan, for not wasting your time waiting for answers from those other people, and once again being YOUR OWN DOCTOR (again) with this great post!.
I know you looked at this amazing stuff a while ago, but not as extensive as here.
Can I beg to differ on a detail? – the moon DOES NOT rotate on it’s own axis – yet another of the weird things about it. The SAME side faces the earth all the time as it goes around (very convenient for the PTB).
Einstein said the Universe is “stranger than we can imagine” – I believe him!.
As an engineer, I very often use the other amazing calculation from nature – PI , such as finding the circumference of a circle, by multiplying it’s diameter x 3.1416 (pi). But the pi calculation actually goes forever! – 3.14159265359………..
The nature of CONSCIOUSNESS and it’s various states proves a higher power & intelligence, but not to those who are too blind to see (know).
Tesla (for one) knew this.
I beg to differ on your begging to differ. The moon does rotate but at the same rate as the earth does so, so it appears to not rotate. According to MS science, this is called ‘tidal locking’ and the explanation sounds like BS, since they only repeat using different words rather than giving us the cause:
What is tidal locking of the Moon?
Tidal locking results in the Moon rotating about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit Earth. Except for libration, this results in the Moon keeping the same face turned toward Earth, as seen in the left figure.
We will have to agree to disagree Dr Allan! :-D, its an optical illusion, and it doesn’t rotate on it’s OWN AXIS. If you waved a magic wand and made the moon stop circling the earth, it would be sitting still and not spinning at all.
Have a look > https://youtu.be/OZIB_leg75Q
The video seems to agree with me. Go to 1:20 or so and read the text. Also:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=does%20the%20moon%20rotate&FORM=ATUR02&PC=ATUR&PTAG=ATUR18RAND
Hello Allan,
Brett is correct, the moon does not rotate on it’s own axis.
Its axis of rotation is on the earth, the barycenter.
That is the reason why we see only one side of it – we view it from its axis of rotation.
The diagrams etc are a trick as they view it from outside the axis of rotation and thus you can see all sides of it as it orbits the earth. That is claimed as evidence it rotates on its own axis, but it is really only evidence that if you change position you get a different view of it as it orbits the earth.
ru and brett: i dunno and hate to agree with MS science but…. ru, I am not following your logic, or maybe it’s me. the link Brett gave seems to agree with me, as does any google search. do you have a link that explains what’s up with this?
Here is a better schematic of the moon circling the earth, and with no botch up writing (which is wrong) to cause confusion.
The moon circles, but does NOT spin on it’s axis.
I call it IT and not her, because I also agree that everything about it points to it being artificial , and deliberately “doctored” to not spin, and hide it’s far side constantly from the earth telescopes https://youtu.be/9nilYlFE_8A
The only way the moon could not be rotating is if you assume the moon is motionless and the earth is circling it. Truth is they are both circling their common point, I am blanking what it’s called.
Baryline/barycenter talks about an object’s orbit around a center of mass not it’s spin.
https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/
or
www[dot]sciencedirect.com/topics/mathematics/barycenter
The more I think about it, the more I wonder if the star disappearances is in fact a Mandela Effect… it’s really no different from the ‘residuals’ that persuaded me (and some of you) that the effect is ‘real’…
and of course we have the star visibility issue… which may imply something equally profound in our misapprehension of… everything.
The moon eclipse video towards the end was nice. Thanks
Another great essay and 2015 moon video.
Thank you Allan.
How has Cowan been responding to your open letters?
thanks, guys. Not a word from Cowan. I sent him a link to this one too. I’m trying not to let the insults affect how I process his information… (his failure to answer my question re Rupert Sheldrake and changing the wording of my query to make it ‘ok’ is part of this)
Very disheartening. He has interviewed people like Alison McDowell (twice) about the elite are playing chess with us while most don’t know a game is occurring or at best we are playing checkers (a metaphor, of course).
And how has he been able to get in discussions with David Icke and even Jon Rappopport.
Or has on Leslie Manookian, Kathrine Austin Fitts and others. But ignore all your stuff is a subtle tell in the making, IMO. Ignoring on purpose from what I can see. Blowing you and us off.
And, for him to bring up Casey’s quote and do nothing with it! Something stinks.
I know, Todd, but it is so hard to think of him as some sort of LH. On the other hand we gotta follow that evidence and it’s not looking good. It could be simple ego, like he doesn’t like to be contradicted, etc., like me starting off telling him the old photos are just as suspect as any new ones, which is pretty fucking obvious….
Wednesday morning… I added a video I made about the lunar eclipse I witnessed at the Grand Canyon in 2015. Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbGqbXM3U1U
The number of kilometers the Moon rotates each day (in order to keep the Neil & Buzz face toward us) is evidence of nothing — except that Talleyrand and the French Masons defined their meter as .0000001 of the distance from the equator to the pole; thus the Moon rotates .00004 of that distance, which is, yes, interesting.
How did they measure the distance from the equator to the pole? Also, I get the impression that these numbers, etc. don’t mean much to you re a higher power. true?
The ratios, the patterns are surely meaningful. i was quibbling (stupidly) with yr wording. Any logical system of measurement those French fellows came up with would have laid bare the ratios, the patterns — which is yr point, of course.
Yes, it seems obvious to me that there is a designer of our universe. Evolutionists always relay on time to explain our development. Over time such and such evolved. They can’t explain the development of a feather, the migration of the monarch butterfly or even our magnificent immune system. How did DNA form in the first place?, and there is more, much more. Great post with great questions. I am a Christian who actually believes in real science and is unafraid of the results of honest investigation. And yes, we are being lied to incessantly. Masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work the mRNA therapies are killing and maiming people; ivermectin, HCQ and more are safe and effective.
Have you read any of the books by the Discovery Institute guys, like Stephen Meyer, Doug Axe etc etc? They debunk Neo-darwinism totally, altho they don’t try to do it for the ‘change over time’ or even ‘common descent’, which is smart and correct.
I am very familiar with Stephen Meyer and the Discovery Institute.
We are not meant to know these things. You can spend your whole life trying to find the answers and yet still be in the dark. Loved this article – through the eons of “time”, mankind has muddled through daily with all their setbacks, wars, famine, disease for a purpose we aren’t supposed to know. Sorta like we see the trees but a “higher power” sees the forest. It’s a great way to spend your life – trying to figure out the mysteries etc or maybe just be thankful be truthful and enjoy what’s around you and who is around you.
We all go to a higher stage once this experience here on Earth is over. Can’t wait
I like your unique ‘forest/trees’ analogy.
Hi Allan,
Longtime reader and very grateful for what you do. Thanks to your numbers listed above, it now strikes me as an interesting coincidence that in Kubrick’s The Shining, Danny was warned to avoid the evil things in room 237—something he fails to do while wearing an Apollo 11 sweatshirt.
Yes, the ‘moon room’ as the key tag letters say, unscrambled.
well that came out totally wonky, didn’t it????
And I typed it so carefully too! Oh well. lol
the Hard Stop
so necessary to poetry
so up-gumming to prose.
I think I know what you mean but not sure. smile
Also, I Still don’t know what is meant by a Limited Hangout
and would love for someone to enlighten me. thanks
This post is very interesting and important. Glad to see you asking the big questions
and looking for the real answers. I spent my whole life doing that and exploring every
avenue and I’m glad I did it that way because when I found the truth I KNEW with every
fiber of my body, soul and spirit that I had indeed found the TRUTH. Which of course led to
a whole new set of questions but little by little those questions have been and are being
answered. My life has been a series of supernatural experiences most of which if I shared
them here. most people would call me a lunatic. I am not a lunatic but a seer with gifts that
I was born with, did not develop, the least of which is the gift of POETRY. I couldn’t sit down
and make up a poem myself but when the poem “comes” to me I am compelled to write it
and am usually amazed when I read it back. Thus, I can’t take credit for the poem. It’s a gift.
And for one to receive a gift, there must be a Giver. Right?
I think that applies to EVERYTHING.
I believe everything in this universe has at least three levels of meaning or three parts and
that is not by accident. I have witnessed documented, certified Miracles with my own eyes and
have been the recipient of several of those miracles, including the one that just brought me
out of that coma to survive when many did not. I also believe that the Mandela Effect is real,
having just experienced that indecipherable mystery for myself. I now understand how you can
be driven out of your mind by it and doubt your own sanity. I don’t know how it’s being done,
I just know t’s being perpetuated and makes no sense whatsoever other than “someone” or
“something” is manifesting Chaos and Confusion on this planet on a scale never seen before
in human history.
I have walked in the darkness and I have walked in the light. I know the difference. I have looked
into the eyes of The Adversary and also into the eyes of the One he hates and they are both REAL.
And believe me, I didn’t go easily into that reality but kicking and screaming. I was a doubter that
had to be given a SIGN. And boy, oh, boy, was I ever given a Sign. And once you know that you
know that you know something, you can’t UN-KNOW it or deny it. (Unless you are, in fact, a lunatic.)
lol lol And I am not a lunatic.
Thanks for letting me have my say. My blogs are both down at the moment so I don’t have anywhere
to express my thoughts. And Allan, I will say this.. you are a very gifted person.
Your mind itself is a gift, your seeking heart and quest for truth is a gift. And I appreciate you. Voo