I’m listening to a dem saying that if they don’t impeach Trump he will get away with his ‘crime’. This of course is a lie. Why not try him in criminal court?
I shot these horse photos a week or so ago. I liked the weird light. Looong exposures, no flash.
They won’t do this or even bring up the possibility (the repubs included). Why? Because in a trial, all the evidence that the election was a fraud would come out. In front of a jury of American citizens.
The deep state (call it what you will) does not want that!
Hence the impeachment bullshit. One last piece of theatre to get us pissed off at each other. Bringing us one step closer to martial law.
I’ve said one thing I’m good at is noticing small, or seemingly small, details. Here’s one:
Click it and notice the fireball over the white one’s head.
Suddenly no one is talking about the evidence of election fraud. Not even the repubs. Not even Trump or his mouthpieces.
Not even the ‘alt media’.
This is very important if anyone has doubts about Trump being in on the current, massive psyops (the election plus COVID). Listen: If, during the sham of a ‘trial’, no one brings up the obvious, inarguable data that proves election fraud, we know they are all in on it. Including most of the alt media.
And some of the evidence is really inarguable. Like the precincts (in PA and elsewhere) that had more votes than people registered to vote. There is no comeback to this one.
Or the blocks of all-Biden votes that came in ‘after the
My favorite. This is a 20 second exposure; it was almost pitch dark. The horses were asleep, standing up (hence no motion blur). Hence the one on the left (the pink horse’s ass) represents the dems.
counting’ on election night. There were blocks of all-Biden ballots numbering in the tens of thousands. This would be utterly impossible in a non-rigged election. (Do you understand why? If not, flip a coin and imagine the odds that it would come up heads (say) ten thousand times in a row. This is the essence of the statistically impossible.) I’ll not go into all the evidence of this sort: There is so much that it would take a book to expose it all.
Addendum: Do you understand the logic? Looks to me like the whole matter of Donald Trump (everything about him and his presidency) was a psyop to divide the country and cause ‘civil unrest’ (best exemplified by the largely planned event of January 6). This was all it was about. Period. And Trump knew it going in. He knew the election would be a fraud and that he would lose. He knew the evidence would be inarguable. And he knew he’s have to shut up about it after it was done.
I ran long and needed one more pic so I threw in this self-portrait from Mexico, 2009. Yeah, I miss it. A lot.
For me the tipoff was Giuliani’s participation. (Giuliani was a deep participant in 9/11.)
Sub-addendum (for those who need their logic spelled out): Given a fraudulent election, an insurrection and overthrow of the government would be warranted.
So the ‘impeachment trial’ is actually important.
You just have to know what to watch for. And the implications thereof.
Allan
“All large scale crime is always an inside job.”
-Slim Pickens to Harry Dean Stanton from “Rancho Deluxe”, 1975
Loved the pinked horse’s ass.
I’d be great to march it into
the current political theater.
My mom is is 91 yrs old, soooo I’m
reluctantly advocating the jab.
Would the lady doctor guarantee
anything other-Wise? I doubt it.
Ten Penny’s for your thoughts.
Think about it, folks: The main reason for the ‘riot’ was the mountains of evidence that the election was a fraud. THAT was the ’cause’ of the events. And Trump spent a good amount of time in his speech defining the evidence (altho he didn’t do a good job). So the evidence is EVERYTHING. And so far not a word about it.
Oh, and the media and the dems are blabbing about how Trump didn’t ‘show remorse.’ If he had shown remorse they would have said ‘He therefore must be guilty.’ Otherwise, why show remorse? Why would anyone show remorse if he he didn’t do something wrong? No one brings any of this up.
I’m listening the hearing now: So far no mention of the evidence. In fact, it sounds like they are going into the tank completely. Incredibly lame rebuttal. Talk to you guys later, after today’s bullshit.
How can I make some money off it ? Really what matters.
If you go to the southwest desert and catch 100 red fire ants, as well as 100 large black ants, t can catch about 100 red fire ants that live in the southwestern desert and also about 100 of those large black ants, and put them in a jar, at first, nothing will happen.
However, if you violently shake the jar and dump them back on the ground the ants will fight until they eventually kill each other.
The thing is, the red ants think the black ants are the enemy and vice versa when, in reality, the real enemy is the person who shook the jar.
This is exactly what’s happening in society today:
Liberal vs Conservative
Black vs White
Mask vs Anti Mask
The real question we should be asking ourselves is who is shaking the jar and why?
Gina Carano ( female MMA ) Actress: fired for freedom of speech
Great points. I think you may tfind this interesting regarding vaccines “Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Explains How the Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months!” https://rumble.com/vckf4v-current-outlook-on-2021-dr.-tenpenny-and-reinette-senum.html
Great video! Thank you for sharing this. Too bad everyone won’t see this. I’ve shared it with a few.
Yes great video…I have shared it also
Yes, good interview, altho Sherry ought to listen to Tom Cowan. She still thinks the ‘virus’ is contagious person to person and has been isolated. She’s probably right about the vaccine. Unfortunately.
You hit it out of the Park! A trial allows cross-examination. Read the Reichstag Fire Trial and the cross-examination of Goering by Dimitrov. He destroyed him easily. Goering got angered. No way would the Dems allow it. Giuliani worked against him and his history
shows what he is.