Although I’ve done this time and again, I’m going to prove that the May 31st ‘manned Spacex mission’ is a fraud. Any one of the proofs I’ll show you is sufficient to prove fraud, so even if one is somehow ‘wrong,’ we still have a Q.E.D. for fakery. So, please, if you think you found a mistake, don’t claim it debunks my premise; you’ll just look foolish.
I’ll put captions in the text blocks next to the images. Click to enlarge. These are from the live broadcast on May 31st.
Image #1
First, the portholes. Notice that the one on the right (of us and the camera) is ‘open’ to an outside view, the one on the left is blocked, i.e., closed off.
The ‘continuity errors’ are proof that shots were done at difference times and places, i.e., the ‘astronauts’ cannot have been in rocket we ‘saw’ launched.
Image #2
Notice that ‘now’ the porthole on the left (of camera) is open. Compare with #1.) This is enough to prove fraud.
But there is plenty more.
Image #3
Enlarge and look closely at where the porthole on the right should be, i.e., just to the right of the door and beyond his leg, which is partially obscuring it. Now that one is blocked off (see Image #1).
Image #4
As Dragon docks we can see that only the porthole on our left (as in Image #2) is open. Look closely at the lowest part of Dragon and you’ll see the door outline and the open port. But on the right of the door (our right), the porthole is closed, which again conflicts with Image #1.
Image #5
Just to verify, here’s another shot with the porthole on the right (on the left from the outside view) shown open.
This ‘mission,’ like all fiction films, was shot ahead of time, out of sequence, on different sets/stages. It’s usually up to a ‘script girl’ to prevent fuck ups like these.
Image #6
As they called out ‘Dragon has gone supersonic,’ there was no sonic boom. If they have an excuse for this, they didn’t mention it. Nor is there an excuse for no sonic boom.
Image #7
Again, this shot of the docking. Now, notice the lighting. The sun was ‘overhead’ at this time, so what is lighting the Dragon’s belly? With no atmosphere to scatter light, where the sun hits is lit, where it doesn’t hit should be pitch dark (no shadowy areas). Here, the belly is even a bit brighter than the top: proof of extra lighting. (The sun is the only light; the earthshine as reflector could not light as bright as the sun. Impossible by the laws of physics.)
Image #8
As I’ve proved elsewhere many times, it is impossible to land a rocket backwards from space with thrust only from the bottom, and stick the landing on a manhole sized target. (Upper atmosphere winds in the 100s of MPH.) Absurd by the laws of physics.
Try balancing a broom and lowering it to a spot on the ground. Can’t be done. Guiding it and keeping it upright simultaneously is impossible. Try it.
Image #9
On the left, this shot of the earth is a pitiful fake. Clouds don’t look like that, nor would they cover that huge area of the earth. This shot went on for ten minutes as the earth turned and we saw no break in these phony clouds.
Image #10
An earlier shot of the phony clouds. You would think they could do better and show some land, but they probably worried that it would be easy to spot fake land. Plus they’d have to coordinate the shots to match where the spacecraft supposedly was.
Too much trouble, considering the idiots (us) they have to fool. Or are they purposely laying in these errors, to see who would notice?
Image #11
This is the moment of liftoff. Play this and you will see the rocket start to move before the flame shoots out from the engine. In real life it would take several seconds after ignition to start the huge weight moving. Notice no flame here, yet the rocket is moving. Impossible by the laws of physics.
Image #12
Now it’s moved farther, even though the engine is not yet at full power. This isn’t as obvious as Image #11, but it’s still impossible. Watch ‘real’ launches and you’ll see that it takes several seconds to get the huge dead weight of the rocket moving. (Especially note the second launch in this compilation.)
Image #13
The Spacex broadcasters told me to remember ‘this historic day’. Mmmm. This image (which I do remember) is from 1966, half a century ago. It was Gemini 8, which sent two astronauts into low earth orbit to dock with another craft. 1966. Before most of you were born. It’s you they are fucking with, with these fakes. They figure old idiots like me will die off, leaving you to be wowed by the same stuff we saw so long ago.
Image #14 (In 1966 Gemini did exactly what Spacex has now claimed to have done. Why hasn’t anyone in the alt media noticed this?)
The Spacex fraud is a psy op whose partial purpose is to distract us from the fact that there has been no actual progress in space since the 1960s.
Meanwhile, I suspect that the real space program has gone way beyond even Kubrick’s 2001 A Space Odyssey; anti-gravity and free energy were both cracked back in the 1950s, but kept ‘black.’
Why fake it? It’s way cheaper for one thing. The money saved goes into the black projects.
Image #15
Just a reminder, these two images are from my previous video on the 2019 faked Spacex docking with the (equally fake) ISS.
Image #16
More continuity problems…
That no one in the ‘alt media’ tells you that Spacex has been faking it from the beginning is a perfect indication of the PTB success in co-opting all media, in order to get us to ‘ignore the senses of our eyes and ears,’ as Orwell put it.
#
Although I was disappointed by the lack of assistance in promoting my post on the film Bug and its implications, I do thank the few of you who pitched in. I’m doing this stuff for you.
Image #17 Where is the view of earth?
Today I received the Bug, Special Edition DVD and checked out the director’s commentary. I’ll think about doing a post on it, but given the lack of enthusiasm for the subject, it may not be worth the effort. I thought a detailed look at the film industry’s attempts to mind control us would be of more interest. My mistake. If I do a post, it will be for those who do seem to understand how important the subject is.
Or I could summon up an essay on surfing, which I sorely miss.
Allan
Image #17 is one of the ‘astronauts’ ‘filming’ the view out the right side porthole (which, according to image #3, is covered over). Still another giveaway: The view of earth should be way brighter than the cabin, but it clearly is not. The earth-projection that’s ‘out there’ is too dimly lit to be seen against the porthole reflection. (Ask yourself why we can’t see the earth outside. See images 9 and 10 for ‘the view’ as it should be. They didn’t properly balance the exposures, inside and outside. Again, it should be brighter outside. The window-view should be blown out, not dark.)
Really folks, do any of you not understand how important this fake Spacex issue is? Do you wonder why I am the only one dealing with it publicly? Do you think about the implications of this, both the issue itself and the roaring silence about it?
Addendum: Re the George Floyd ‘murder,’ has anyone asked who called for an ambulance? Surely wasn’t the cops. All they had to do was let him up and put him in the car. For a lot of reasons, this is obviously another faked event to stir us up/divide us and distract us. It just never ends.
HellllooOOHHH?
Are my the only goofball pining for Part Deux of the entomological gross-fest, already?
Don’t tell me I have to subscribe, FFS.
And I won’t try and convert anybody, either. It’s a waste of time AND it’s too late for the normies. S has HTF. And I’ve got my popcorn and a front row seat.
They have blacks hating whites; whites hating whites; and everybody hating the pigs. It’s fawking perfect.
Carnage anybody?
Wonder what’s coming next. Hope that RV is camo’d up, Allunn.
But post before you come across sasquatch, or somethin. Or some weird ranch with glowing orbs from the 5th dimension, š
Great post, and you are so correct again, – and all accomplished by the bloody TV Lies at 6!!!…can you believe it!??!
I’m counting on the likelihood that the low down deviants, orchestrating the whole fake narrative, have underestimated yet again the power of the human spirit, Brett. Not that of the bipedal mass of meat gohlems, of course – they are just spiritless ghouls; but real human beings.
And, moreover, that the psychopath has overplayed his hand, yet again. As he is wont to do.
Meantimes, hope y’all are brassed up down under.
Stay safe~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9DJvrevt94
FAKEX Anomalies
6,882 viewsā¢Jun 4, 2020
LogicBeforeAuthority
COMMENTS
Goodbye Blue Sky
2 days ago
Wow that “landing” of the rocket is so ridiculous
There were raindrops on the camera one second, the feed gets cut(on purpose)
and next scene shows a Landed Rocket….but no raindrops.
Just one anomaly. Also, look at the clouds in the before and after pictures
…
Buried by Google on all searches:
https://www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/fakex/
FakeX (SpaceX nickname)
Hi Allan, I’m glad you picked this topic up again. I have watched several videos of other rocket launches and there is always a delay between ignition and lift off. How is it physically possible that the SpaceX rockets go up instantly when the countdown hits zero and the boosters are just about to ignite? And why does no physicist or engineer notice that? By the way, this is the second time that a mouse appeared on top of rocker fuselage during a SpaceX livestream indicating that most of their camera footage is pre-produced with CGI. Considering that every mission is faked how do they keep their staff in line? The cannot risk having any of their employees talk about it or aks inconvenient questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2J-W4J4JNA
You ask: ‘And why does no physicist or engineer notice that?’ (Referring to impossible instantaneous lift off with Spacex launches.)
As with myriad other ‘truths’, if this one came out the implications would just be ‘too much’ in terms of the explosion of paradigms/worldviews. Think about the implications of this imagery being faked: It means (for one) that the PTB can now fake live events in front of thousands of witnesses. We then have to ask What else have they been faking and for how long? What else is pure balderdash?
I would compare this to the Electric Universe model in physics/cosmology: If the truth were accepted, for instance, virtually every Nobel Prize of the last 100 years (since Einstein) would have to be erased/taken back. Here’s a good example of how EU destroys most of modern cosmology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZTGh35kioQ
Not sure that’s a mouse but it sure is something they can’t explain if that rocket engine really were in space.
How they keep their employees in line goes back to my first point, i.e., Orwell’s doublethink, or the idea that ‘I will see it when I believe it.’ And don’t forget about compartmentalization. The employees only know what they need to know to get their jobs done. What we don’t know is how far to the top of the pyramid does the doublethink go?
fwiw (not much) I am awaiting further commentary and analysis from you on Bug.
OK, I posted the question on Quora and got a response from a rocket engineer, which does make sense. Basically he says that solid fuel rockets create an instant boost after ignition and can thus lift off the rocket immediately. So I watched some videos of other solid fuel rocket launches and they behave exactly the same. But now comes the kicker: the Falcon9 rocket actully uses liquid rocket fuel! I wonder how they will now explain their way out of this.
Thanks for looking into that. I didnāt know there was a diff between solid and liquid fuels but this does explain some of the fast lift offs. Falcon is of course liquid so looks like they are flat busted.
by the way, an anonymous source tells me he/she knows via records that they have never bought liquid oxygen. Why would they since there are no real ignitions?
They seem to use a new way of ignition that is more immediate. There was a launch problem because of an issue with this system. It instantly starts the engine up by mixing two chemicals.
https://www.wacotrib.com/blogs/joe_science/the-tea-teb-glitch-cant-light-a-falcon-9-without-a-spark/article_1b7c4ae6-5a16-11e3-afbb-0019bb2963f4.html
Sorry, I forgot the Qora link with the answer of the engineer: https://www.quora.com/qemail/track_click?aoid=9bRdJJ7ZBw2&aoty=16&aty=4&cp=0&ct=1591796301530988&et=103&force_notif_url&id=6a0b63b001254554b2fe99a4bfed6063¬if_url=%2FHow-is-it-possible-that-SpaceX-rocket-immediately-lifts-off-after-ignition-whereas-other-rocket-launches-both-Russian-and-American-usually-have-a-slight-delay-See-this-video-for-comparison%2Fanswer%2FBill-Horger&request_id=4&src=1&st=1591796301583380&stories=8780031315&uid=16E0gD0WSkY&v=0
I have found they add onion layers of fakery on top of their outlandish piles of BS Lies, to cause confusion. *Confusion*, and more distraction I must add, is one of their major weapons.
And they get a cruel kick out of taking the piss, as their daily sport (along with our money).
It is pretty much impossible to identify the first object. But it should not be there!.
The second object definitely looks like a Rat, that has been poorly CGI ‘d – by someone who doesn’t really know the shape of their head & ears properly. And it should not be there!.
Rockets landing backwards is all I needed to see to know it’s an absurd hoax. That tells us everything we need know about what they REALLY think of us (stupid and naive) There’s a lady on YT who goes by “Bling Bling, the BS of ISS” you might want to look at if you haven’t already.
In nice, just once in a while to get a comment like this one. I will check out Bling Bling.
Problem with Bling: she’s a flat earther. Also, her stuff avoids real proofs of fakery. Controlled op, I think.
“Meanwhile, I suspect that the real space program has gone way beyond even Kubrickās 2001 A Space Odyssey; anti-gravity and free energy were both cracked back in the 1950s, but kept āblack.ā ”
I agree, wholeheartedly! We can only speculate at how many mind-boggling discoveries/inventions have been taken into The Dark over the last 50-60 years, under the sacred rubric of *national security*. Our elected leaders in Congress, rubber-stamp every last goddamned appropriation for dark funding requested by the Pentagon, using this threadbare sleight-of-hand. They do this to keep unlimited funds flowing into their ” war chests”, thus guaranteeing ree!ection.
Fucking idiots.
There’s not a doubt in my mind, that mankind – or at least a very elite cadre of our species – is now interstellar. Unknown to him, Donald Trump’s proposed Space Fleet is simply window dressing.
Good point re the āspace forceā.
Allan, You mentioned āOr I could summon up an essay on surfing, which I sorely missā.
I think that would be a great idea, along with riding a wave again.
Also, I really enjoyed āIn Search of Capt Zeroā and was always hoping there would be a sequel or even a prequel.
I sure would love to read a surf essay as well. Something to hold us over. We are desperate to get back in the water. Mazatlan’s beaches/surf spots are still closed yet people can stand in close proximity to line up for beer! Mazatlan Surf Addiction’s instructor, Miguel Rodriguez, is interviewed here requesting permission to surf at least a couple of hours in the morning and evening .
https://pmxportal.com/2020/06/05/se-manifiestan-surfos-para-pedir-que-los-dejen-entrar-a-las-olas/?fbclid=IwAR02E16JgTEwCTKCvb8sOSorlwIgLsPZIyhhmzOoIgw__GiNSi6FYFqKLc0
There IS a sequel. right there on the sidebar. Let me know when youāre done reading.
You bristled all over her. Canāt you get along with anyone?
Notoriously pains-taking auteur director Kubrick made the interior of the Discovery’s cockpit inconsistent with the exterior (model) shots. Movie-house-goers paid most attention to her ‘carousel,’ a centrifuge that mimicked gravity for the eatin’ and joggin’ two live crew, and that was rendered consistently (if bafflingly to some) in and out.
Does this mean Kubrick was already leaking to us twelve years before The Shining (1980), indeed fifteen months before the Giant Leap ?
Yes. There are so many continuity errors in 2001 that I have to assume Kubrick on some level held his audience in contempt. Just the initial image of the earth moon and sun lined up is impossible, in that there is light on the ‘dark’ side of the moon. Give him credit tho: His representation of the earth from space is no worse than the phony shit they give us now. As I show above, actually, Kubrick’s earth is way more realistic than Spacex’s.
Here’s a good example of a recent ‘earth’ effort: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4nMYQhC6KA
Notice how there is no land anywhere as the earth turns and how phony the clouds are. Is the earth really covered in clouds like that? Kubrick’s earth likewise showed no land masses.
Also, if you pay close attention to the lighting in the foreground, you can tell it doesn’t match where the sun should be to get a ‘full earth’ in the background. (The sun should be directly behind the camera to get a full earth. In shots where you can tell the light source is to camera left (by shadows), what’s lighting the earth horizon (the rim) to the right? That horizon is curving away from the light source and therefore should be dark, i.e., there should be a terminator there.)
Contempt? if the guy was as smart as they say he was, he would have been insane NOT to hold most of us in contempt. (imagine him living long enough to have had dinner conversations about Nine One One, for instance, and how those would have gone).
But note that by ‘Kubrick was already leaking’ i am positing an intentional message to SOME of us.
My gosh, his stage name was Cube Brick. They love the cube, and brick walls, the builders. It’s all so deep.
PS – the Floyd picture in the Wiki is in front of a brick wall…
An example of how fucked up YT is with its algorithm: I went to check my video about star visibility and lying astronauts. I did a YT search for ‘why are the astronauts still lying ac weisbecker’… this is the exact title and author of the video, i.e., you can’t get more specific than that. Well, I had to go to the second page to find the video, and it has over 100k views.
This is a reason why the truth stays hidden.
Put ac Weisbecker first. There is a lot of content about space/astronaut conspiracy theories. You are not the most popular, sorry to crush your ego. Thatās how dem algorithms roll.
‘Sorry to crush your ego’? Is this really the best you can do in posting a negative comment? If so, it’s quite a boost to my ego.
In the compilation of rocket launches one of them is SpaceX Falcon Heavy test flight. Is this real launch of a rocket just to get people believing they can do it (legitimacy) so when the fake ones happen people donāt question it? Iām 46 and have never had the single bit of interest in space, space flight, or the space program. Trying to read up more on it now since you have posted about these fake SpaceX missions.
I look around the web for articles about debunking the space program of the 60ās, before I was born, but does anyone have a recommendation on good articles pertaining to this subject. Thank you
I’m not sure about that Falcon launch: there is much more of a build up of flame etc before it moves, so it might be legit, but I dunno…. one interesting compilation is of the Spacex launches from day one, which you can see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AllaFzIPaG4&t=1079s
I believe all these are fake (because what they show is not possible), plus they prove that the ‘fins’ and little gas thrusters don’t do anything since most of these don’t have them. (This debunks anyone saying that’s how it’s done.) Plus when the cattle are running (in fear of the noise etc), they are going in the wrong direction.
Re the 1960s, we know the Apollo missions were frauds (right?). Plus I found an old test of the Mercury capsules which showed that they would tumble on re-entry and therefore burn up, so that puts that whole program in doubt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBuEyZHIYIU
I dunno exactly what all these means, except to say we are being gaslit by the ‘chemical rocket programs’, I just don’t know to what degree. If you peruse my channel you might find some help in your investigation: https://www.youtube.com/user/911TruthFighter/videos?disable_polymer=1
Mike,
Re: “articles about debunking the space program of the 60ās”
“Wagging The Moondoggie” https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
was one of the first debunkings of the moon landings.
“The Narrow Gate” https://thenarrowgateweb.com/
has several chapters/episodes dealing with the “space” & “space flight.” Chapater 17 “The Greatest Liars of All Time”, is about NASA specifically. https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/22/the-greatest-liars-of-all-time/
If anyone wants to know the agenda behind all the crapola going on right now, this is from the horse’s mouth: https://youtu.be/pfVdMWzKwjc
Watching now! Holi Moli Ravioli!!!!
Just an observation on George Floyd. The ambulance he was put into did not even have any EMT,s inside . they we’re police officers. Since when did ambulances have police instead of EMTs. What is up with that.
https://youtu.be/5-4GiROO-Jw
Yeah, everyone involved was an actor of some kind, including Floyd himself.
Out for a fishing trip, they must be on a tight budget, look at these boots!
And they “lost” the transmission, the landing of the rocket was not televised.
https://youtu.be/1k5dXJQuzkY?t=1336
The clean cockpit with flat screens, it’s a mirror to the pictures of not so nice places and riots.
They love the mirror thing, it’s from the occult. Taking a knee by a colored guy, versus of a white guy, which started the riots. At the same time they’ve put an inscription on top of the rebuilt castle in Berlin, featuring the taking a knee Bible verse, Philippians 2:10.
Um typing on a cellphone where googlerA.I auto bots correct what I’m typing. Sorry there are few of those in the above post ( Space X are Babylonian Majik Shitshow) Aloha Timothy
*Event 201- LOCKSTEP* ……. and spaces are pure distraction Babylonian Majik show the gall of those Evil fuxerz!
As Palestine is completely divided and conquered…….. Eretz Israel
We know the endgame and are powerless to do shit about it. Transhumanistic dystopia.
Sorry I brought children into this world to suffer thru this sh1tshow.
It’s because of crap like this I escaped into surfing, but now the waters are polluted,the fish are mostly gone and the skies are full of crap. (I have almost gotten use to the crowds)
Yeah they (PTB)want us to just check out and do nothing…….. We’re tempted.
Thinking of unplugging completely, letting my cellphone plan go extinct and not have a online connection at all. How do I communicate? How do I connect? Back to internet cafes(which are closed) and library cards?(closed too)
I need a few good waves to wash the sin of this fallen world off my back even just for a few moments.
Aloha Allan
Are you speaking in code, brah?
Reallygraceful’s latest video is worth a watch for calling out several of the most recent mega psyops, including George Floyd. I am trying to get an email address for her so I can forward the Bug analysis.
https://youtu.be/VLVPV_FezWY
I think part of the AI feedback loop includes making these successive psyops more and more transparent, in part to accurately Guage just how mind-numbed the populace has become. Kinda like poking an animal more and more aggressively to test the depths of anethesia…
Yeah she is on point and so are a few others who are essentially gagged by the hegemony.
Most could give a sh1t though.
Knowledge is almost useless the way the PTB has set the stage to run.
Aloha
I think they get a grin out of this blog/forum for how it has so few participants. Tells them all is well. Ditto all my spacex videos (among other exposes), which average no more than 1 – 3,000 views at best.
Hi, Alan.
Perhaps your genuinely appreciative audience for any given topic will never be more than the few. “Ou polla, alla pollu” ( “Not quantity, but quality” ).
The whole time I was watching the Space-X launch…I was thinking……..
What is wrong with this picture? Is this like the Jodie Foster movie CONTACT?
While the world was watching the “fake thing” the “real thing” was taking
place somewhere else! Now I know why my “spidey sense” was going wild.
Hmmmm. Very interesting. I guess it really is true what the “Voice” said to me
in 1996 “Nothing Is As It Seems”. I wrote something called Vision In The World
of the Blind once in prose form but it’s pretty powerful and exposes what goes
on behind the scenes.As an aside, one of my cousins worked on the Challenger
launch project. When it blew up, he was never seen again. His files, car, clothes,
belongings in his house, his life records, everything vanished as though he never existed.
A mystery that drove my family to the point of insanity until we had to just let it go. (As if…!)
Some of us wondered if somehow he was actually aboard the Challenger! (dead, of course)
My brain gets overwhelmed sometimes thinking about all these things.
I just have to turn it off and regroup.
I just heard someone on a YT video say, Our ignorance is Their bliss.
How true that is!
Very interesting story about your cousin’s disappearance (and his files etc too). Do you mind telling us what his job was? (Or email me if you don’t want to go into details publicly.)
Sorry for your loss, He went to the island all the others are sent to after completing their mission is what I’m guessing.we will all know the truth someday way past the time we are able to use that truth to fix things….. Blessings and peace unto you and your family. Aloha
They have also already revealed that very “Island” to us in the movies as well.
Pretty much everything in the movies (controlled by you know who) is happening, or going to happen > https://youtu.be/vrQZSco77Pg
I’m sorry. This is my first time hearing about this “island”.
How did I miss that??? All I know was the last thing we heard
was he was telling people there was a problem with the O rings.
He wanted the mission stopped. But they wouldn’t. I’ll never forget
standing there watching the Challenger go up and bragging to the
lady I was employed by about my cousin working on the project
and then watching it blow to smithereens. I hit the floor in shock.
I don’t think I could say one sensible word for a couple of days.
A family member went down there to see the cousin a couple of days
later when no one could get in contact with him…(a suddenly non-working
number, Who are you calling for? We have no employee by that name, etc etc)
And she was treated like a nutcase trying to report a UFO to the MIB! Told to
go home. There was no record that the man ever existed! The story is very long
but you get the picture. This post is jogging my memories of that whole awful scenario.
I may not have all the details exactly right, it was a long time ago and we just had to block it
out of our minds or go crazy. Several years ago, I was at a meeting where there was a
prophetic seer speaking and sharing some of the strange visions he had had in his life.
At one point he mentioned the Challenger and my ears pricked up. He said something
about seeing very bad suspicious things going on around that project and especially
that day. Said one scientist..technician..don’t remember the word he used tried to abort
the mission and was “silenced”. I almost came out of my chair! Later, I told him that he must
have seen my cousin and told him about the situation and his memories filled in some
blanks for us. Quite amazing. There’s a tape somewhere of that meeting that I’d love to
get my hands on. Thanks Allan for confirming things I always suspected. No telling what
other memories you will jog next!!! haha (But, no, I have never seen Bigfoot!!! lol) However, and
I’m not joking, both my mother and my ex-husband and three of his sons and a couple of
nephews have had a couple of very close encounters with those things! No thank you!!!!!
Thanks for the details.
I think I can answer something for you about the Alt Media. Although Iāve corresponded with very few who could be considered a part of it (the first was Eric Hufschmid, whom I greatly respect, but he is friends with no one), I think to me the majority of them, the moon landing is just so obviously a hoax that most of them have no interest in tracing the careers of the Elon Musks of this world. As I remember one commenter putting it in his podcast, he knew from years ago going to broadcasting school, I think in the ā80s, thereās no way back then they had the energy to broadcast āmoon signalsā down in a vacuum
and have them go to everyoneās TV. The early exposers of this, from Bill Kaysinf to Bart Sibrel, rarely if ever mention it, but maybe they felt they didnāt need to.
As for Bug, it interested me that it brought up things like the Bilderberg (Build-a-Bug?) Conference, but I mainly got out of it the fact that Ashley Judd was actually a pretty good actress.
The ending was moving for that reason. Who cares if sheās a nut, she canāt be an all-bad person, and the fact that – particularly after the last few months – I may want to see Hollywood dismantled from within, that doesnāt make me resentful of these aging feminist spinsters (as she undoubtedly now is) going into their retirement peacefully. I hope sheās happy! But I donāt think shining a light for people on the rare movie that in its slight way attempts to expose things (has there been more than about 10 of them from Hollywood since the ā70s) necessarily does much; although I wish it did, and Iād still be interested in you take on, say, Eyes Wide Shut. (Plus, Friedkin aināt saying anything! I guarantee that, but I still think youāre good at this film review thing, and I look forward to more.)
Read the post. It does NOT say Bug tries to expose anything! Exactly the opposite.
I know, but the fact that the movie deals with some of these subjects at all accordingly makes it one of these kind of Matrixesque movies, more of which seem to have been released since 1999, although I donāt think that movie, unlike Bug, actually has characters talking about any Mk-Ultra plans, etc.
Wohhhhh,,,,,
Alien? Are you perchance a mensa?
Cuzz dude, when it comes to a smarrrt take u is off da scale, homey!
BLM!š
That’s it for this one, Azzy. One comment is all you get.