While working on my ‘book reviews’ (Most Dangerous Book and the Moon book), I thought I’d take a moment to do a short one inspired by one of your comments. ‘SUB’, earlier today, wrote, in part:1.
1. A one hour Youtube clip by NLP Master James Corbett:https://www.corbettreport.com/911wargames/– Worthwhile to watch with a fist of salt (LH)
Corbett often reminds us visually of what he’s saying: ‘Hijacked’… ‘Real’…
I gave the link a look, then another, armed with my trusty notebook – as SUB himself points out, Corbett is a master of NLP (subtle and roundabout misdirection/disinformation via use of language and imagery); he’s gotten better over the years since his Kuala Lumpur lecture in support of the Pentagon official fiction. The above ‘Wargames on 9/11’ really is an advance in technique. (If you haven’t seen my Open Letter to Corbett, here it is.)
After my initial viewing, I asked myself, ‘What’s the takeaway here?’ Or what would it be for most folks? If you have the time please give it a look. Click SUB’s link or right here.
Assuming you’ve seen it: No one is going to remember the details, are they? Something about Wargames being used by the perps to… to do what? Mmmmm. Something to do with planes, right?.
Yep, looks like a real plane to me!
One point that is repeated has to do with simulated radar blips, which were part of the many Wargames Corbett tells us about (too many details but this comes through clearly). There were lots of fake planes ‘flying around’ that day.
With pen and paper in hand I kept track of Corbett’s use of language in the above one-hour documentary. (Remember how I counted his use of ‘Flight 77’ — also linked above – or versions thereof in his earlier lecture? Well, James has refined his methodology since then… I’d like to think partly because of me.) Here is a bit of what I came up with:
I quickly lost count of the number of times he used the word ‘real’ or versions thereof, but it was enough to scream out ‘NLP’! The word ‘hijack’ also appeared very frequently, usually ‘near’ his use of ‘real’ (although they were not always in the same sentence). The use of the word ‘real’ while telling us that dozens or more of the radar blips on various screens that day were fake… well, it threw me off a bit, as it was meant to. Anyway, the total repetitions of ‘hijack’ (words to the effect) were just south of one hundred.
Just ask yourself what you REMEMBER from his video…
‘Real’… ‘Hijack’… ‘Real’… ‘Hijack’… ‘Real’… ‘Hijack’… and on and on it went, all the while reminding us that many of the ‘radar’ planes didn’t really exist; they weren’t actually ‘flying around.’
For me, this was significant since I know the ‘ending’ of the story (remember how I’ve repeated that ‘endings are everything’?), which is this: no aircraft (let alone jumbos) crashed into the WTC or the Pentagon (or in Pennsylvania) that day. Since there were no planes, there were no hijackings either. (Yes, folks, those ’18 Arabs’ were not even patsies, not in the strictest sense. They were complete ‘misdirections.’)
Not only does Corbett not say or show us anything that would even hint in this direction, but his repetition of ‘hijack’ along with ‘real’ accomplishes the opposite, and quite clearly, albeit on a (barely) subliminal level. I mean: With all those fake planes flying around, did it never occur to Corbett that the ‘hijackings’ were just as fake as the radar blips? Again, from his documentary, quite the opposite. ‘Real’… ‘Hijack’… ‘Real’… ‘Hijack’… ‘Real’… ‘Hijack’…
All you need to know is right here: Plane crash site, ‘the (fake folks!) attack,’ the ‘patsies’…
By the way, no other pilots ‘saw’ any of the ‘flights’ en route – anywhere between ‘takeoffs’ and ‘crashes’ — even when asked by control towers to look out their windscreens to where the ‘hijacked planes’ were supposed to be. I know this from other films that play back the radio transmissions. It’s sort of amazing that no one points this out.
Everything about Corbett’s documentary implies or outright says that real planes that were really hijacked were flying around that day, in spite of the fact that not a single part of any ‘wreckage’ (meagre as it is) can be linked to any of the ‘planes.’
Corbett (with the help of his editing partner, Broc West) makes good use of imagery, too. He makes sure we get plenty of views of ‘real’ airplanes, mostly American and United, just to further implant the idea of real planes with real people inside them. Likewise he peppers his production with those horrific images we remember so well from that day: Those impossible images of airplanes slicing through steel facades (and even coming out on the other side!). You know, the images you’ve seen in my ‘Walter’ video. And more! I’d left out some impossible imagery, for attention span reasons in my 12 minute film. But James has an hour and he wastes little of it.
Addendum: After reading the initial comments I’m adding this: The Wargames had several purposes, all of which were misdirection, the most important being re-enforcing the false notion that airplanes caused the damage at the WTC/Pentagon/Shanksville. There is no actual evidence except radar blips that hijacked planes flew anywhere that day, and as Corbett’s video shows, radar blips on 9/11 were ‘injected’ onto radar ‘scopes’ at the will of the perps. Corbett just ‘forgot’ to mention this (along with the above observation that no one actually saw the planes en route to their targets).
Further, as is stated, radio transmissions were likewise easily faked, so none of the radio chatter by the hijackers means anything; the ‘cell phone calls’ from passengers has likewise been debunked as impossible. But the main ‘evidence’ that no planes were hijacked that day is simple logic: Would you put the success of a mission of this magnitude in the hands of a gang of dumbass, drunken arabs, given that – with the wizardry of electronic fakery – real planes were unnecessary?
Point being; Corbett’s ‘Wargames’ video is still another steaming pile of misdirectional horse shit.
He works in his fave subject: the ‘plane’ that hit the Pentagon.
I want to get back to my ‘book reviews’ so I’ll stop here, although I could go on. A couple quick thoughts though: As is the case with Miles Mathis (and others), Corbett’s output is truly over the top-impossible. As a writer/filmmaker you can take my word on this. Or, better, do your own calculations.
Also and this one is inspired by the commentator who calls himself ‘X’: Recall how I made fun of him because – even with the massive and esoteric secrets he harbors — he couldn’t ‘wake up’ his wife? Well, Corbett’s like that too. In an interview he let slip that his Japanese wife ‘isn’t interested’ in ‘his work.’ In fact, he admitted, she won’t even help with translations.
Lots of images like this one, just to remind you.
Assuming you believe his output, Corbett must be in front of his Mac 20 hours a day… And he can’t even talk to his wife about his world-saving open source research?
What sort of household is that? X?….
Allan
I’m on the road for a couple days so expect a bit of a delay before my next post. Also, I may be unable to moderate comments so I’d ask that you use your judgment. Try to be on topic and maybe limit your number of comments a bit. I love it that I’m inspiring some of you and all but… too many makes it difficult to follow a thread…
There has been a lot of interesting comments on the blog since Alan has opened the option to comment. I have gleaned loads of new info and been given links to check out. Thanks commentors.
It has been my observation that since the comments have been open there has been some interesting developments and watching the dynamics unfold has been eye opening and entertaining.
I am in agreement with Mr Crispy Bacon and X that there is a heaping helping of Group Think in the comment section. It maybe that so many commentors felt alone with their thoughts and opinions, and now finding a place filled with similar minded folks, they attack anyone who doesn’t fall in line with their opinions which are newly strengthed and reinforced via group members who share similar thoughts. Ad homin attacks are par for the course here. The ideas of folks who dont follow Alan’s directions (even though Alan doesn’t follow them), directions which are sometimes limiting the exchange of knowledge, are made fun of and called names. Heaven help those with a different opinion than Alan and the gang.
I also think that Alan your ego is hurting the exchange of ideas. As the host you are terribly rude, have to control the dialouge and make threats against people who don’t agree with you. Image the comments section as a party. Your guests, the interesting, the thoughtful, the inspiring, guests woukd leave. All you would have are the desperate sychophant fans that are not that interesting. Be a better host, Alan. Everyone commentting is bringing you a hostess gift of knowledge, insight, and most are bringing goodwill with those presents. As a good host, you should accept these gifts and be gracious enough to know that you are lucky to be the recipient of such things. It may be your party and you can cry and demean others if you want to, but what a great party it would be if you didn’t act like an ego maniac who knows it all and is always right.
U got your knowledge from so many others. So let others get their knowledge from others. Time to put the control freak away, Alan.
No one likes him.
I’ll be a better host and feel a lot ‘luckier’ when dumb ass comments like this one stop coming in.
posted under Corbett War Games
Which one of the following statements is correct?
a. Corbett is exposing how the Sept 11th aerial war games were part of the conspiracy, specifally designed so that the hijackers would be able to fly and crash their planes into their targets, unmolested by air defense or fighter jets because no one could tell which radar blips were real.
b. agent Corbett is covering up the fact that there were no hijackers, no hijacked airplanes, and the Sept 11th aerial war games were specifically designed so that imaginary hijacked planes would be able to fly unmolested by air defense or fighter jets, and crash into their targets, and no one would be able to point to radar records and say, THEY WERE ALL IMAGINARY PLANES!
Good job agent Corbett. Extremely polished and professional. Not at all like a solo truther effort.
Wow, what a stir up..!
Since I contributed to inspire Allan to write this post I feel I should make a short comment.
First, if anyone finds my English “awkward” – correct, it’s not my first language.
My intention to post the 2 posts (= including J.Corbett’s) from David Icke’s site, was to create awareness about the subtilities (i.e. NLP) that one can find on most “trusted” Alt. I-sites today.
I’m not going to dig more into NLP (= well, some…) – Allan already got the most important in this post.
I will however point out two things regarding 911/most False flag’s that I personally believe is on the “Agenda” (= helpful here to NOT have English among my first lingos):
1. Fear, Lies (Also by Omission), Gaslighting (= Confusion/Selfdoubt) and Divide & Conquer. All “methods” used by “Cluster B” personalities/various “groups” (In Politics, NGO’s, Agencies etc. (= often referred to as: TPTB or “The Elite”.
Have a look at the comments… did “they” succeed?
2. TPTB/PTB/”The Elite”. Where I come from these words (translated) are not used for those that seem(!) to have the power.
The expressions seem engrained in English and unconsciously used – This will empower “them”.
Personally, I’d use “The Psychopaths/Narcissists That Be” instead…
Otherwise, one unconsciously “elevate” them plus give ones own Power away..!
You wanna talk about “hijack”? It is this comment section that has been hijacked! I feel surrounded by misdirection on all sides. It feels like a good half of the “people” commenting here have ulterior motives.
I agree. Great point in the blog worthy of discussion but not worth the time to sort through the distraction and shit posts.
Must have hit a nerve outing Corbett’s NLP and the real purpose behind amalgam virgo, northern vigilant gaurdian warriors, etc etc an nauseum. It was all just so people would swallow the plane bullshit and the increase pest infestation means they don’t want it discussed.
Assuming the “they” you refer to is real, they would never hijack the likes of your posts. And assuming there is a “they” that infiltrates this post by hitting a nerve outing Corbett, “they’ again would have to do nothing at all to stop misdirection because you misdirect yourself with sycophantic group think quite well.
If and only if any of your comment is directed at me… you asked I told. And if it is directed at me you have followed through with prophecy. ” I am sure we would all be more than welcome to hear your knowledge if you are willing to share it. At this point I am trying to figure out which identities are X trying to support himself second-hand, so I would really love to know what you were referring to if not for my own enlightenment just so that you know that you will not be shunned for sharing knowledge ever here.”
Was not directed at you C.P. Bacon, and I was going to thank you for your thorough post below explaining what you had meant. Seemed very genuine. My comment above was more of a reference to the fact that I have no freaking clue anymore who is genuine and who is not.
I know. I’m about to post one that deals with ‘Robin Adair’ but the same could be said for quite a few comments here. It’s possible that ‘the 300’ have descended upon us. What to do? When in doubt, ‘spam ’em’? I’m thinking along these lines….
PFFFFT! Such baloney. In all my experience in conspiro “groups” I have never come across a troll commentator training camp. Believe or be banned. Agree and fall in line or I’ll make a post about you. Ask Robin a question why don’t you? Nope, make a post outing the fake “they” muffling your truth. Allan I finally can articulate a description for my observations here… performance art. This whole “project” is nothing but performance art. It needs to be said that rehashing 911 youtube videos is nothing more than the biggest distraction from the powers that be. Making people comment according to your guidelines is the first authoritarian conspiro experience I have had. Make your post on Robin all I see is someone participating but you see a troll, please make a post on me. With that I will challenge you to a youtube debate outing your naivete and your ignorance or cover up of the real problem which is not no planes believe or be banned but outing the powers that be. Just talk about folks staying silent, well hear my noise and lets do the first ACW debate on youtube. We will debate your Miles Mathis post and focus exclusively on your mathematical solution (see James Corbett just to stay on topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0wZAXrzrzg) to his thesis of nepotistic psyops. Invite me to phone call, I will be much obliged. Funny you out Corbett and do the worst kind of distraction just EXACTLY like Corbett. Conceal the powers that be… There are no agents or trolls here just people with different opinions who you pick on with your troll trainees. This is some of the lowest level shit I’ve ever witnessed. You have marsh collins by a nose ring parroting your distraction and it is hilarious… As you cull your “fans” and commentators you will eventually have enough trolls to go around and give 5 stars to Bain and Levendas book (instigate financial support for TPTB with 5 star rating and claim it is a must read?), you will have more thumbs up on your youtube vids and you will have protection to sit a spin the same old 911 youtube videos you drone into oblivion. You can whine about people who don’t agree with and line them up to comment on dissenters. Getting your trolls to believe there are people out here, “they” as mush collins so eloquently puts it is classic conspiracy industrial complex myth making to make you seem important. I am me, I am 1 person and bring your best. I thought this would be fun outing shitheads like Jan Irvin and Co. but this is just pure authoritarian stupidity occulting your performance art project.
Crispy Bacon….. Chris P………….. right. Get a grip! Sounds as if you’ve fallen into the abyss of The Bottomless Pit and you’re enjoying it.
Thankfully, I’m no longer on the fence about you………………
Good-bye.
~Kimberlie
more sycophantic group think… stay on the fence with All In… Rewind repeat… gotta go my secret agent land line is blowing up… allans truth is about to take TPTB down.
I really think you have taken offense for no reason here, CPB. Authoritarian? I think Allan was more annoyed. He never said you had to agree, but why were so many of the first wave of comments literally 100% off-topic/unrelated and some were even intentionally undercutting his whole point? That is no coincidence, and it is not authoritarian to try to keep people on point. I have never once seen Allan demand you believe what he does (I find his information valuable, but I don’t blindly agree with everything he says).
They already have their panties in a twist. There will be no discussion permitted. I have no doubt your observations were correct. How else to have imaginary planes hitting buildings than during aerial war games with screens full of imaginary radar blips that no one FAA, Norad, or anyone monitoring the airspace can tell real from fake. Afterwards they can make up any story they want to fit how it actually played out.
Congratulations on pointing out the obvious but invisible truth.
“I feel surrounded by misdirection on all sides” you are.. this whole blog is pure misdirection. good observation.
Are you saying Allan himself is attempting to misdirect?
Yes, he misdirects from the powers that be by doing literally the exact same schpeel as Corbett on the most important angle for people to understand the powers that be… That said, I dont think he is an agent. In addition to misdirction he straight up lies when he tell you folks state ran intel come into his comments and cause chaos… And as I have been trying to reply to you he erases my comment… that by defintion is an authoritarian gatekeeper… so keep lying to yourself wondering who is “real”. This is performance art from a literal script writer and you people are to star struck to get that through you heads. this is group is under a spell… NOBODY FROM ANY INTEL IS IN HERE… JUST PEOPLE WITH DIFFERING OPINIONS… EVERYBODY IS REAL, JUST NOT BY THE DEFINITION ALLAN HAS POISONED YOUR MINDS WITH… HOPEFULLY HE IS SLEEPING BECAUSE THIS COMMENT WILL BE ERASED AS SOON AS HE UNPLUGS. ANYONE SAYING THEY HAVE SPOOKS IN THEIR COMMENTS IS LYING. ANYONE WHO SAYS SPOOKS PAY ATTENTION TO THEM IS LYING SO THINK TO YOURSELF… WHO IS THE REAL DUPE IN THESE COMMENTS?
wow. i hadn’t seen this before. i’ll let someone else answer it:
I spent the afternoon musing on Life. If you think of it, what a
queer thing Life is! So unusual, so unlike anything else, don’t
you know, if you see what I mean.
P.G. Wodehouse
Even Cheryl Attkisson states shills and trolls are everywhere in here two most recent books. Boy, have you ratted yourself out Chris P. Bacon. Any real fellow researcher knows your statements are total BS.
Ha, ha, ha – Eric. Best comment ever.
(Back to Allan’s new ‘Rest Stop’ post. Good enough to read 3 times!)
Point taken. Sorry.
On topic – planes or no planes, war, games, reasoning – here’s the link I was looking for:
Flight of the Bumble Planes by ‘Snake’ Plissken, as told to Carol Valentine.
Agree or not agree, still worth a read in trying to figure 911 planes things out.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/plissken.htm
Really there is no solid proof that planes did not impact the twin towers. There is plenty of speculation about impossible maneuvers, ground speeds etc. yet no proof that planes did not in fact impact the towers.
Let’s get this figured out first before we jump to holograms, missiles, nuclear blasts etc. OK?
This is not to say that planes impacting the towers were enough to cause the collapse of those buildings into their own footprints, just that we need to verify that no planes actually struck the buildings.
LOVE THE DOUBLE NEGATIVE IN YOUR FIRST SENTENCE! TELLS ME THAT THE REST IS GONNA BE AMUSING…
allan
Remember, it is entirely possible that hijackers with little flight experience were on board these planes but this doesn’t mean that they were able to steer those aircraft into relatively small targets accurately. It is also possible that remote control was used to make certain of hitting the targets – but we will probably never know as there is no evidence of this.
ANOTHER BEAUT OF A FIRST SENTENCE! allan
Actually a better video than Corbett’s propaganda with more accuracy is the following by Pilots for 9/11 Truth:
https://youtu.be/-Laaq44SDgg
Hi Robin,
“…more accuracy…” More accuracy of what?
Can you please explain in your own words why you link to that and how does it disprove or help prove Allan’s points? [please reference time marks in your video you believe is important] to help us understand.
It’s fun in a nostalgic way to read the ‘dot-connecting’ you’ve done. All highly credible, and unquestionably guarded by the inability to prove an ‘event’ didn’t happen. Let’s say all that you speculate IS TRUE…then what? What does the world look/feel like the morning after this mass revelation? Is there something to be gained in uncovering this conspiracy? -OR- could this eventually, maybe even now, be the unmasking of the mostly ambivalent dystopia we already live in?
It’s important because the more the 9/11 Commission Report is discredited as the actual hoax it is. The less likely it will be that the American public will continue to support this phony Global War on Terror and giving up their liberties.
Now you can go back to Apatheia and study your navel.
So, a revolution to overthrow the government? How else would you effectively exercise non-support? That hasn’t been an option for over 100 years.
If this is some “Red Dawn” fantasy you have, good on ya sir! I’m sure it’s a rewarding hobby because it feels like you’re making a difference, as you are granted just the right amount of freedom to allow this mirage. It’s an ingenious balance of control coupled with delusion of agency.
I’ll just be over here with my navel, LoL
We’re making a difference. So far less people believe the Government’s Narrative day by day while you study your navel.
Now go troll somewhere else.
> We’re making a difference. So far less people believe the Government’s Narrative day by day …
Sorry for my ignorance, I use to live more than 5.000 miles away from the USofA. But do they ? If this people vote at elections, and “support our troops”, they are in the fake MSM matrix up to they necks – if not deeper.
As I see it, less than a fraction of a per mill is waking up, or awake. And this few (IMHO these people her included) are not even a real annoyance to TPTB, else they (we) would be silenced one or another way.
You are the worst kind, Bluedog. It’s not about starting a damn revolution. It’s personal and about truth, not societal. Things can be personally rewarding. You are clearly trying to get the message across that “resistance is futile” to break down opposition, but you will never be able to convince me that it is not more personally rewarding to know the truth, or at least know what is NOT true.
Allan’s work is not speculation. He pointed out impossibilities. That is fundamentally different from speculation. His work is to point out what CAN’T be accurate, so I would say he has done an excellent job of proving something did not happen. You claimed the opposite. Getting horrible vibes from you and your words. The logical conclusion of what you have all written is “Give up. It’s all worthless and there is no point to what you are doing.” Do YOU really believe that? Or are you just trying to get US to believe that (and if so, why would you try to break us down)?
Knowing is better than not knowing, and Allan’s writings are not speculative. He has said that certain things are impossible, and this leaves it to you to prove that they ARE possible. Speculation is making a case without facts. An aluminum airplane perfectly entering a steel structure is factually impossible (not to mention the whole “coming out the other side”). Given this, and all other evidence, we are left with the old Sherlock Holmes, “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth”.
Eric,
Well said! I wholeheartedly agree with you about Bluedog. I agree, too, that we are here to find a commonality in what we have found to be Truth regarding the absolute impossibility of many of the 911 ‘official stories’ fed to us by the PTB – most especially the impossibility of an aluminum airplane to slice through a steel structure like butter. We aren’t here to start a revolution! I’m here for the personal reward of just knowing there are indeed people like Allan, you, me, and others here who seek the Truth of 911…. and, we are actually finding the it! I am here to learn how to discern the Lie from the Truth and find out how the PTB use NLP and other wicked ‘crafts’ to direct/persuade/brainwash the populace of the world so that I can do all I can to PREVENT the Lie from entering my Truth Zone.
Allan has opened a door of knowledge regarding the Lies perpetrated by the PTB throughout history – not just 911 – that few are willing to open! Having people like Bluedog, X, and Lou distract and muddy the waters with foolish drivel is a waste of Allan’s time and ours.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
What about shooting a candle thru solid wood? About as impossible as aluminium thru steel facade? John Nash (A Beautiful Mind) made this claim, doubters have since replicated this (candle thru wood). Candle thru wood!?! Obviously impossible!! Must be faked or holograms or just NLP overwhelming my eyeballs.
Bluedog, you smell military. As ‘good’ effective military has zero empathy.
Even ol’ Smedley Butler did his ‘duty’, couldn’t see what was going on until he was
a civilian, retired.
Link for fun: https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html
James Corbett is high quality truther industrial complex trash. It takes little to no effort to see he gate keeps and misdirects with the best of them. A question I have… has he EVER presented ANYTHING that was NOT misdirection? I think not because why present it if it does not need to be muddied by a pro… Very curious about your review of Worlds most dangerous book. After reading material Lavenda has input on I steer clear as he is one of the kings of adding “mystic mumbo jumbo” to topics he delves into. I threw the baby out with the bath water on that one. Lavenda teaming up with Bain should be a very interesting Cotton Matheresque witch hunt for spectral evidences. Be safe, rubber side down, stay between the ditches…
I know. See the ‘Most Helpful Review’ on Amazon. That’s me, and you indeed threw the baby out…
What is the baby if I may jump straight to the point?
Actually I found the Most Dangerous Book to be an eye opening experience. I’m looking forward to reading your take on it.
still waiting on the baby… and yet you stay “SILENT”.
I stay SILENT? Hey, fella, I’ve been on the road and am working on an essay about the book. If you can’t wait, hit the road yourself, and refrain from making ignorant comments here. (Did you read my Amazon review? Why are you SILENT about it?)
Chris P. Bacon,
I’ve been reading The Most Dangerous Book – Just finished page 174. In a nutshell, the PTB are now almost complete in their taking over the human will, the human mind. Look around you. The populace is knee deep in toxic programming: alphabet news, movies, fashion, pre school, day care, Facebook, Twitter, ‘rights’, violence, sex, nudity, drugs, death, war, sports… Sports…..SPORTS. We are told about everything – and how to think and feel about it. The PTB seek to enslave the soul and confound the natural intelligence.
Quote from page 174 of TMDB: “We do not own our ‘own’ thoughts and yet believe ourselves capable of “independent” thought and choice.”
another quote :
Life Imitates Art
There is a long tradition among the super-elite (PTB) of the purposeful intertwining of reality and fantasy—utilizing print and film in particular—in part as a means of creating inside jokes and mocking the public to their faces, but, more significantly, towards the ultimate end of blurring the masses’ perceived distinction between the real and unreal.
This book is wicked with a capital “W”. I think I’ve read enough. Not that I don’t want to know who, how, and why – the book and the PTB are way too wicked to attempt to ‘understand’ the how and why. I don’t need to shoot heroin to know I don’t want to know heroin up close and personal. The fact I am aware of evil and wickedness in high places and that it is my responsibility to do all I can, no matter how captivating, not to succumb to their Agenda, is enough for me.
The point is there is a War going on for our souls. It is a War of good against evil. This book explains the workings of the systematic ritual takeover of mankind by the powerfully wicked PTB.
Kind regards to all,
~Kimberlie
This is exactly the response desired by TPTB. A response with FEAR as the ultimate outcome. That is why Lavenda and Bain are on this mission and that is why Lavenda and Bain are left in the margins. There are actual labels that can be applied to TPTB which out their occult influence. I could ramble on with examples rolling around the truther industrial complex propaganda dynamo but I will not for fear of being labeled as someone with “knowledge” and being sent into the margins for disagreeing. Works like this take the attention off of TPTB and and lead us into lala land. The quotes you post are nothing new at all, at least to me. More NLP by the feeders of folly. And when you say look around, that is my connection to reality. Im not looking on the internet I’m looking around the state of Colorado. The populace knee deep in toxic programming are the ones looking for the truth like us. The rest are under a comfortable spell of divide and conquer via politics, propaganda, economics and religion. I (like X) have been down the rabbit hole and back. I have been up and down the hole many times. Each time I come back with something worthwhile and each and every time I come back I find a bunch of distraction from TPTB. Just to be clear I think the stuff X posted is too occulted and esoteric to be valuable and to me personally its just weird. But he has some idea in his head he is trying to articulate or he doesnt. It can be very simple or very complex defending on our worldview.
Bacon,
To be clear, nobody would send you to the margins for sharing what you know. The only case there has been such a phenomenon here was when a commenter referred to their own knowledge without any specifics or direct reference to what they were talking about when questioned. I am sure we would all be more than welcome to hear your knowledge if you are willing to share it. At this point I am trying to figure out which identities are X trying to support himself second-hand, so I would really love to know what you were referring to if not for my own enlightenment just so that you know that you will not be shunned for sharing knowledge ever here.
Eric, thanks for asking… So to be clear, this is just referencing the spin and total misdirection Levenda will take you on consistently by eluding to “evil” and satanic influence. This statement is in reference to the “true” occult/esoteric influence the country is under. This subject is too broad for me to articulate in one post so statements and questions will probably have to be the method if it does not derail post which I imagine it will. This is not new as it floats around the propaganda dynamo of truth but it is misdirected by the likes of Pete Levenda and now rightish wingish Bain. The “true” occult/esoteric influence is the Rosicrucian order (some call them Freemason and I cannot deny that reality as Francis Bacon has claim to starting both) veiled in Protestant Christianity concealing the Kabbalistic influence of Isaac Luria creating the clash of civilizations. The very first colonizing preachers of this land brought with them veins and strains of Protestantism totally influenced by the Rosi Cross. This influence seems to have the biggest effect on American culture because out of the “Divines” (preachers) we give literal births to the people who inbreed and go on to start and influence colleges,
start very important secret societies, become presidents of the United States and form establishments like the CIA on and on and on. Have you ever heard of a Protestant pedophile problem? No and you won’t because this country from top to bottom is Protestant influenced and that especially includes the media. Have we not heard chicken little run around and say, “it’s the Jews, it’s the Jews”? That does NOT mean a bunch of Protestant believers run FOX or MSNBC although they might, it means the very first occult and esoteric influences were Protestants who created institutions that create institutions. TPTB is the most fundamental focal point to understand any of this and following there histories and tracking their footprint will yield incredible results. And because we live in America the starting point should be the start of the colonies. If we are to point fingers and a very specific modern influence it would be the Crown of England. Thanks for asking.
Chris P. Bacon,
Can explain further why you believe Protestants are behind the curtain?
Please site a few books or references regarding your comment, “…Protestant Christianity concealing the Kabbalistic influence of Isaac Luria creating the clash of civilizations. The very first colonizing preachers of this land brought with them veins and strains of Protestantism totally influenced by the Rosi Cross. This influence seems to have the biggest effect on American culture because out of the “Divines” (preachers) we give literal births to the people who inbreed and go on to start and influence colleges, start very important secret societies, become presidents of the United States and form establishments like the CIA on and on and on. Have you ever heard of a Protestant pedophile problem? No and you won’t because this country from top to bottom is Protestant influenced and that especially includes the media….”
What bothers me more than “the populace” being “knee deep in toxic programming” is the fact that the majority in the alt-media and truther community blindly consume what the “mainstream” news cycle puts in front of their faces.
Look at the average “alternative” news media blog or website, all you’ll get is rehashing of “news” items as if all of the stories are real. Clearly the majority of the truthers out there are still being taken for the same ride as the ones they call the sheeple.
A perfect example of this is Allan’s blog posts about how the gov. intel community already knew the outcome of the Trump elections way before the first “polls” were held by CNN and ABC. Allan as one of the very few rightfully pointed out that AI has already been far more advanced than what even the alt-media provides us info about.
Nice take. I love it Kimberlie. Me I just read the book. You found true meaning in it. My fault is I tend to be too pragmatic and miss a lot of things.
One thing I’ve noticed Allan is that few 9/11 Researchers give any significance to Stewart AFB but it was directly in the flight paths of AA 11 and UA 175. See Northwoods about switching planes for drones.
Also it is only mention once on the News that UA 93 safely landed in Cleveland Ohio and the passengers were evacuated. However this is in the Documentary In Plane Sight
https://youtu.be/igX7Z8VstN4
which leaves the question about 77 which flew over the Whitehouse (remember Cheney’s famous countdown reported by Minneta?) then headed to the Pentagon. In other words flew over the most secure and restricted air space in the world unmolested by SAMs then plunges into the Pentagon exactly where an audit was being conducted on the DOD’s missing Trillions.
How fortuitous!
Damn straight! That the “hijacked planes” were a distraction! It was a legend that had been build up for years with the Bojinka Plot followed off by Atta’s flying circus of flight school trainees.
They had an even more spectacular show planned but luckily the NYPD and state police were’t in on the act and busted the Israelis who had planned to blow up the tunnels and bridges that led to Manhattan.
http://impiousdigest.com/russia-presents-evidence-against-us-uk-and-israel-as-being-the-actual-911-terrorist-2/
Well, Robin, i guess it doesn’t matter how many addendums I put in there, for some they will just go on assuming that hijacked (or any) ‘evil’ planes were flying around that day, in spite of the lack of real evidence, and no matter how many times I repeat my observations. Did you actually READ my post? Or is this more muddying of the waters….
(Rest stop; gotta go)
I never wrote that any planes were “hijacked”. I suggest actually reading my post at your next stop.
Also read relevant point regarding Operation Northwoods:
Page 13 of 15-page GWU file on Operation Northwoods (page 10 of Pentagon report)
Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba.
It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday.
An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At the designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual aircraft would be converted to a drone.
The drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.
The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal.
See map:
https://fromthelowestpeak.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/flight-paths-of-9-11-hijacked-planes.jpg
Note that both “AA 11” and “UA 175” both intersect over Stewart AFB.
Also note that Vigilant Guardian and other Drills were live meaning they used actual aircraft not just simulated blips.
Yet you seem to be suggesting that all the planes were merely computer simulations.
Personally I do not believe that actual planes hit the WTC Towers or the Pentagon but something did. The likely probability it was a missile of some kind.
Robin, you clearly in subtle ways refer to the flights as real flights and I think this is more what Allan was pointing out. For the planes to have been switched, they have to have existed in the first place. You refer to flight paths and you refer to a flight which went over the White House. You do the same kind of thing as in the video where you subtly refer to things that imply the flights are real. I don’t know which commenters are real and which are misdirection at this point. For you to post such a comment when Allan’s whole point was that the Corbett video is misdirection on the subject of real planes, makes your comment extremely baffling.
Furthermore I will just point out a gigantic logical flaw in what you are saying…if you believe it is possible that real planes were switched for fake planes mid-flight, then how can you not believe that there may not have been real planes in the first place? Again, your comment implies without saying that the planes are very real and talks about the potential for them being switched mid-flight which would be a next to impossible feat that you believe is possible. Logically, if you believe such a feat were possible, then a simpler approach would have been for there to not have been real planes in the first place…especially considering other evidence available.
Thank you, Eric. Exactly correct. I don’t know if Robin was just not thinking clearly in this (I’ve done this but I eventually, go ‘Shit, what was I thinking?!’), or whether he was screwing with us on purpose (muddying water, etc.).
I never said they were switched mid flight. See my comment about Steward AFB on the flight paths of “11” and “175”. Also review Operation Northwoods which was possibly used as a template for the swap out.
Northwoods was written in ’62. If they considered it feasible then I’m sure it would have been much more feasible in 2001.
By the way I do not ascribe to Hokum’s razor i.e. the simplest answer is always the correct one since conspiracies are always complex and involve many moving parts.
The main purpose of the Sept 11 war games was to support the illusion that there were real planes involved in the WTC , Pentagon, and the Shanksville dirt spot.
The main purpose of the agent Corbett psychological warfare team operations video, is to support the illusion that there were real planes involved in the WTC , Pentagon, and the Shanksville dirt spot.
Right, Marsh.. Please tell Robin….
Already responded.
I’ll add that no plane crashed near Shanksville or burrowed into the Pentagon or Penetrated the WTCs but that there were actual planes in play.
It doesn’t have to be one or the other. Either POV are extreme in my opinion.
I am always concerned when people state things as pure fact, as you do here Robin. Do you have any evidence for what you claim here as truth without any support? Seeing your comments here in several places, I seriously concerned about your motives. You state unequivocally planes were “in play”. Do you have any evidence on that? I ask genuinely.
Where exactly have stated anything as “fact” without supporting documents? One example please otherwise you are doing exactly what you claim I am doing.
Ummm, your whole comment is stated as pure fact without evidence?
You asked so here is the quote from you above, “I’ll add that no plane crashed near Shanksville or burrowed into the Pentagon or Penetrated the WTCs but that there were actual planes in play.”
Here you state no plane crashed at Shanksville (perhaps to seem reasonable), but then you drop the “there were actual planes in play that day” afterwards like it is as obvious as Shanksville. Not so. You state these things above as pure fact with nothing supporting. Since Allan’s main argument is no-planes, it is highly suspicious that you keep dropping these implied references to real planes all over the place without actually making an argument for it. You just keep trying to state it as pure fact in subtle ways. In this case you paired it with other more reasonable opinions to make your “real planes” opinion seem like it is an equally obvious. Nice try. Honestly, excellent misdirectional tactics there. I give it a B+…7 out of 10..
Shanksville wasn’t a dirt spot and I heard some talking head on tv call it a “remote field.” It wasn’t a remote field either. It was land that was being farmed located near a mining operation of some sort.
That was a farmer’s field and the farmer’s property where some missile hit the ground. The farmer reported he saw “two planes” so he saw two “somethings.” He saw the decoy plane probably.
For a fact I also know this farmer became very ill afterwards. There was a local doctor who wrote a small book about the strange illnesses affecting people in the area after 9/11. My aunt sent us the book about a year after 9/11. I no longer have it, wish I could find it.
I wrote about the experience of Shanksville in previous comments.
My best guess, too, way back when I was guessing. I recall Prouty (http://prouty.org/ )
writing somewhere that most of the work in assassinations and other dirty military-style
activity was in the ‘cover’ (his term) – the cover story/stories that made the truth of any
action unavailable/unbelievable/unspreadable. Trouble is, these covers end up being so dang complex that they won’t be waterproof. Witness, in Prouty’s case, he read news of Kennedy
in newspapers before it was possible to have a legitimate process time of input – write – print –
distribute. Fine distinctions, but he was in the business, recognized familiar mistakes.
And I seem to recall an article on planes buzzing around – swarming – that Tuesday morning.
I think it was an essay on Peter Meyer’s site (http://serendipity.li ) called…..
Flight of the Bumblebees – no, wait – Flight of the BumblePlanes. It’s in there somewhere.
Google it. Distraction, I thought, like a magician’s trick. Man, these dudes have balls … or else
they have a serene confidence in their deep knowledge of the average person’s mental
workings.
Reminds me of something Solzhenitsyn said of The Protocols: “They have the mark of genius.”
Link for fun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al5R-bExnw4
And something else for the guys and gals who say, “Prove it!” There ain’t no proof – of anything ever. There are only ‘indications’. Ya gotta think, put 2 + 2 together. It’s for them/us that can see, to see; hear, to hear, etc.
You know how when you watch bullshit, propaganda, NLP mind control,…. and you know its bullshit propaganda,….and you know its jerking your mind around,…. and it pisses you off, but it is just hard to put your finger on the details and devices being used, hard to expose the poison hidden inside the candy coated pill, hard to shine a light on the liar as he ply his craft, casts his spell?
The light is shining and the trickster is seen, his devices obvious. With shared discernment I see better.
Clearly the entire Sept 11th so called truth movement has descended into a (? desperate?… i hope), all hands on deck effort to protect their fake, imaginary, video composite, war game blip, CGI, planes and plane crashes from truly disappearing, from the last and only place they ever existed, in the minds of the sheeple and the sheeple truthers.
I have an urge to plagiarize the clarity of insight and post a comment under agent Corbett’s video.
This is always a good idea. A small thing but they add up. I get where I’m going I’ll paste a link to this in his comments. You guys might consider doing likewise. Curiosity will build…. hitting the road… Now!
By the way. If that was all there was to it then there would not have been a reason to shift fighters away from NEADs and Langley:
http://tarpley.net/docs/drills_of_911.pdf
http://www.physics911.net/pdf/jacobs.pdf
Robin Adair, what part of these PDF’s refute how an aluminum plane can slice thru steel and concrete like butter or the observation that we all see of the collusion with the media due to the fake imagery played on TV and the news over and over and oaver?
What part of these PDF’s refute anything that Allan has presented? Please cite specific paragraphs as I couldn’t find one.
Maybe I’m wrong in my searching thru these two articles, but if they are not present, then why post them in the first place?
I have stated specifically and continually that ALUMINUM PLANES CAN NOT PENETRATE TEMPERED STEEL BUILDING!!! Where exactly have I stated otherwise?
You obviously missed the point I was trying to make here about planes being swapped for drones or missiles according to Northwoods.
Thanks – So you are saying that the passenger flights were real, but the planes were swapped with drones?
No I am not saying that at all. Again I suggest reading Operation Northwoods.
I have read Northwoods and am quite aware of it. Just trying to understand your opinion better. Now I’m more confused b/c Northwoods says to swap ‘commercial’ planes with drones. You refer me to read it but then your opinion seems to be that passenger planes were not swapped for drones. Please clarify.
Here are all my references for my research… have fun.
New Atlantis Frank Bacon
The Secret Teachings of All Ages MP Hall
Republic Plato
The Great Works of Christ in America AKA Magnalia Christi Volumes 1,2,3 Cotton Mather
Genealogies of Mayflower Families Volumes 1,2,3 Gary Boy Roberts
Genealogies of Connecticut Families Volumes 1,2,3 GBR
Genealogies of New England Families 1,2,3 GBR
The Royal Descents of 600 Immigrants 1 volume. GBR
Secret history of the west Nicholas Hagger
The syndicate Nicholas Hagger
The secret founding of America Nicholas Hagger
Kabbalah Gershom Sholem
Origins of The Kabbalah Gershom Sholem
Saturns Jews Moshe Idel
The Rosicrucian enlightenment Frances Yates
The occult philosophy in the Elizabethan age Frances Yates
Preaching Eugenics Christine Rosen
Peace Among the Willows Howard B. White
Holy Dissent Jewish and Christian Mystics in Eastern Europe Glenn Dynner
Transnational Networks and Cross-Religious Exchange in the 17th century Brandon Marriott
White Cargo The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America Jordan and Walsh
Encyclopedia Judaica
Read all of these books, take notes and collect names… do the genealogy. Track connections through nepotism and matriculation very accurately and watch the puzzle build itself. So go read all these books then get back with me.
Thanks CPB – I’ll look into these. I would say that my observations of who owns everything seems to be more Jewish than Protestant. However, I’ll still look at what you’ve provided.
The PTB set up the false opposition to 9/11 before 9/11 even happened and we see it in the form of everyone in the Truth Movement that the PTB permits us to see. How could it be otherwise?
The main objectives they achieve are to confuse neutralize and dissolve the true internal opposition to 9/11 truth seeking while they pursue their policies of other controlled forms of dissent.
The PTB has given us permission to discuss it. It’s not because we live in a society where free speech is permissable (it isn’t) but that they control how we think while using it.
In Europe, certain discussions about historical events are totally forbidden. People serve jail time if they engage in them. Here, we can engage to a certain extent, because we are actually more controlled.
Yes but the thing is that we can all agree on is that what the 9/11 Commission and NIST says happened is nothing but a fabricated false narrative and pure science fiction fantasy worthy of a Hugo award.
How it was done is the only thing that seems to be in question here since we also know to a degree who did it and why by motive, means and opportunity.
This has already been covered in Tarpley’s book on Synthetic Terror i.e. The Yinnon Plan, A Clean Break and of course the infamous think tank known as A Project for a New American Century that produced a paper entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses calling for a “New Pearl Harbor” and set us on the course of the various wars we are fighting allegedly under the shibboleth of “Fighting Terrorism” which is nothing but a lie.
The problem with the so called “Truther” movement is that it has been infiltrated. That said there are still good people who are part of it and not everybody in it is not some kind of Government shill.
What they’ve accomplished despite being infiltrated is actually quite laudable and salutary which is getting Americans to question the Official Conspiracy Theory.
This is why they are attempting to misdirect it and therefore discredit it. See the following:
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/07/01/why-is-israel-controlling-9-11-troof/
Personally I always wondered why “Troofers” like Corbett and others would say on one hand that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition yet on the other accept the fantasy that aluminum planes could have penetrated the WTC towers and burrowed deeply into the Pentagon.
Also I never accepted the thermite or nanothermite or any other what are known as conventional explosives hypothesis since it require planting over sixty tons of explosive and then would never guarantee the WTC’s full destruction and thus the destruction of the evidence such as the missiles used to simulate planes or the conventional explosives set to prevent too many people from escaping etc.
Besides Ted Taylor frankly discussed how the WTCs could be taken down using nukes back in 1973.
It also explains why the NORAD at Cheyenne Mountain for the first time in history shut their Atomic Bomb proof doors and sent up the Doomsday Plane.
Yet any mention of this was the last thing those controlling in the Truth Movement wanted to hear.
Nor did some of them want to hear about something other than planes hitting the towers and the Pentagon. In fact there was one so called “Truther”who controlled a discussion board on the subject who discredited anyone who brought it up on the discussion board and in fact claiming that they were there and actually saw the plane themselves!
Also take the case of Allan who proved conclusively that Saint John O’Neil the patron saint and martyr enshrined by many of the Troofers may have actually been in on the plan and was hired months before 9/11 not the day before as many including Larry Wright the author of that steaming pile of bullshit that had been blessed with Pulitzer Prize known as the Looming Tower.
Anyway the thing to do in my opinion is sort the wheat from the chaff and realize that the Truth movement has been infiltrated and work with those who are actually seeking the Truth.
You hit the nail on the head here Allan. Hope your travels are safe. Be well, traveller.
Just fyi:
A Conspiracy Theory …
The C.I.A. IS The American Media
Penn Magazine
September 2018
pennmagazine.us
Here in flip-page format:
https://archive.org/stream/AConspiracyTheory1/A_Conspiracy_Theory%281%29#page/n113
Mike Palecek, editor
Chuck Gregory, publisher
Excellent you solved the riddle😎
What’s the plan?
You tell us.
Had a thought – and forgive my interruption, it’s not directly at the narrower focus of Allan’s
topic post this day. (Skip if you wish.)
It’s on the wider scope of How the World Really Works (HTWRW) in a historical view that is accessible and credible to the average person whose life/career is lulled by work within the walls of vast government bureaucracies, huge ‘benevolent’ undemanding academic bodies and just general shopaholic consumer mall-wastelands.
It’s this: a Wikipedia long entry on the life of Jean Chretien. Just read it and reflect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Chr%C3%A9tien
(if it doesn’t link, then search for him on Wikipedia)
A real man. In an Unreal world.
And a short video clip for fun:
https://globalnews.ca/video/3014361/there-is-no-pill-for-stupidity-jean-chretien-comments-on-donald-trump
I very politely suggest you try to avoid going off topic and multiple comments and you immediately do both. Are you trying to annoy me or distract readers? Something else I haven’t thought of?
After reading the first few comments I added an addendum to the post. It appears I wasn’t clear enough in making my point about the purposes of the ‘Wargames.’
Don’t worry so much about the comments Allan. You were crystal clear! No addendum required. Lots of these comments I worry have been hijacked by your “300 identities” type folks who only seek to obfuscate away from the main point with trivialities or just unrelated dreck. Lots of expansion down pointless roads, or trying to “create a following” on as yet unknown special knowledge that only the commenter possesses. COUGH you-know-who…
Worry about your writing, which is excellent. When your write-ups are as good as they are, no amount of obfuscation can derail the enlightenment that you share.
Eric, for you. I read your comments, see you as real. MOST of the expert-sounding comments, though, um, no. I do see relations to stuff kinda ‘off-topic’, but others don’t, so no more postin’ it. So the topic is planes, it’s 9.11, it’s the holes in the ‘swiss cheese’
of the lie. It’s what did, didn’t, couldn’t have happened, how Corbett lies. That it?
Allan’s details are right on. Okay. Is anyone else interested more in – on this topic –
of first-hand accounts? Peculiarities there?
Allan,
I just finished watching ” Wargames on 911″. Thank you for recommending it. The world governments are in cahoots with the media. No doubt in my mind. Planning exercises and scenarios that match the actual “Event” is not coincidental. It is planned that way so to dupe the populace and/or have a back up in the event of a mess up. As far as believability, hey, the PTB usually put their intent in movies, song lyrics, books, etc before they actually take place. This way, the populace already believes the Lie(s) they know in their heart of hearts to be truth because they already saw it, heard it, or read it. In essence, the psyop was already previewed by the populace either before it happened in ‘real’ life or after the fact.
Who said it, “repeat a lie long enough and it will become truth….. Hitler?
I’m here to learn how to discern the Truth from Lie. I’m here to learn how to spot a lie at first glance in order to not waste my time. I here to do all I can to understand how NLP and all the other diverse techniques work to inch into the mind and the subconscious in order to brainwash millions of people into believing the Lies. I want to be able to cut it off at the pass BEFORE infiltration.
Thank you, Allan, for opening up Comments for all of us who want to search the Truth, know the Truth, and share the Truth with those who are like-minded.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
Kimberlie,
The quote is from Goebbels,
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
However, when Allan said the biggest thing going on is deceit and people’s ability to practice self-deceit (my paraphrases), this hit me:
I think people agree before hand in order to survive as a group, or even a nation, that they have to agree to lie to themselves, to lie to each other and to know they’re lying to each other but do it anyway. Almost as if the lie is essential in some sort of perverse way, to exist as a group or a nation.
If anyone breaks out and tells the Truth, it frightens the group and they band together in the Lie, and they begin to hate the person who told the Truth because the Truth teller is not conforming to the agreed upon Lie on which the group rests.
Just sayin’
Martaine,
Similarly, one can substitute ‘a different interepretation’ instead of ‘the Truth’, and ‘the accepted interpretation’ instead of ‘the Lie’, thus:
If anyone breaks out and tells a different interepretation, it frightens the group and they band together in the accepted interpretation, and they begin to hate the person who told a different interepretation because the different interepretation teller is not conforming to the agreed upon accepted interpretation on which the group rests.
It is extremely difficult to tell someone (or a group) something that requires a paradigm shift.
So, even the small thing I’ve been trying to broach, is being rejected as anathema/NLP/deception, etc. So, it shouldn’t be too difficult to see why there’s no point me attempting to broach anything from further down the rabbit hole – despite demands otherwise.
I have also suggested ‘more holistic research’, but even that’s no good if it requires straying from ones comfort zone.
Even me simply pointing out basic human nature is regarded as subversive.
So, I learn something in my participation here: People really are on their own, and must progress at their own rate. They cannot be helped, however far along they are on their discoveries.
More of X thinking it’s all about him. X, what exactly is this “small thing” you’ve been “trying to broach” that has been rejected? Or is this also part of your secret knowledge that you, being the all knowing and glorious X that we all should praise, would prefer to keep to yourself?
All praises and glories to almighty X!
I know. X has become a cartoon of himself. Re banning him, i’ll see what sort of mood I’m in when I get where i’m going…
Ok, I’m outta here.
I’ll post no more comments – until/unless invited to at future date.
Falcon X ! Muxk!
X,
You have been “invited” over and over again to come right out with it for whatever you claim to “know” that we all don’t get. Numerous times you have told people that they are not on your level so they aren’t worthy of your conversation. We have asked and “invited” you many times to share your insights! Please do! On the chance you really are genuine, I am here to tell you that I am interested in being enlightened and if you have some kind of enlightenment to share I am all ears. Allan’s comments are definitely not the right place (and for that reason I highly encourage you to start your own blog), but you have made so many references within these comments to some kind of deep, deep “rabbit hole” knowledge that you possess and we don’t, that you are 100% invited to share that with us.
My specific issue with you, and what makes me seriously question your motives, is that you have not once in a specific or direct way told us what kind of special insight you possess. So it is really at the point where I say “put up or shut up” . Many people have asked you for direct answers to things you have stated, and I have not once seen you give a direct answer.
You can sure string a lot of words together that say absolutely nothing. I’ve spoken to spooks and believe me they don’t play cryptic Yoda like you do.
Either say what you mean succinctly or forget it.
Some of your posts are okay. Maybe the other commenters are already in psychological pleasing mode. This post seemed okay to me but you now have a bad rep.
Comment sections are like that. Somebody stands out maybe for good reason, they’re a drag in some way. But then the others join in in order to score points and let the leader know they’re on his side so he’s on their side. Just sayin’
Dunno. Group think happens everywhere.
Well X it’s happened just a matter of time
till groupthink takes over you’re deemed out of line
we cry and we shout for the freedom to speak
we insist very strongly it’s truth that we seek
what form will that truth come in, is it one we can take
or is it confined only to the truth that we make
the truth is a constant no matter it’s form
or when we know not does it call for our scorn
have we not come here one goal in our mind
it’s truth we are seeking so let us be kind
those brain cells on fire can twist into a kink
sometimes . . . . .
it’s just with your heart you must think.
You are taking Goebbels comment out of context as he was referring to the Jewish control of both western media and Russian media propaganda of the day which never left the west. The “state” he was speaking of was the “Russian Bolshevik state”.
Context was the telling of a lie, and if repeated enough, will be believed.
Martaine, I must agree that the quote speaks for itself, regardless of context. To Allan’s point, the repetition in the case of the Corbett video is of a subliminal type and for the purpose of control of the alternative media. If someone were first getting interested in the topic, they would be subliminally programmed to believe the hijackings and airplanes were real.
Is your last name Goering? The quote is actually an interpretation of what Hitler already said in Mien Kampf:
https://archive.org/stream/meinkampf035176mbp/meinkampf035176mbp_djvu.txt
I’m aware that who said that quote for sure has filled up hundreds of google pages with different responses. It has also been attributed to Lenin. Throw in a little Marx. The Goebbel’s quote was sufficient to prove the point about repeating a lie until it becomes a truth.
WTH are you saying with is my last name Goering. I don’t like that.
Really Martaine you should follow the comments more closely since I was responding to Herr Herman here and not you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-u4-Ey4ndw
I listened for an hour to your link to audio book The Crowd Gustave LE BON (1841 – 1931)
It had no relevance to me, and did not ring true to my simple mind at all. People don’t want waror revolution and destruction. They suffer under insufferable conditions without rising to violence unless they are starving. The books premise is a myth. Divide and conquer, Hegelian dialectics, are the tools of destruction and warfare, and they are not the tools of the masses but of the elites the book seems to credit with civilization. Order out of Chaos is the real destruction playing out and is not instigated by the Crowds.
“I think people agree before hand in order to survive as a group” this is a quote of yours and Le Bon is the intellect behind this exploitation. Walter Lippman also has a great (meaning informative just to guard my words) book call Public Opinion. The book is actual analysis of group dynamic that is used to exploit us… I did not post it as something I ‘like’, just something that to me, is important to understand while being exploited. Crowds are being controlled to create chaos. Labels are hoisted upon us to voluntarily group up for exploitation. Sorry to rile feathers.. geez
I think you and x come out of the same rabbit hole.
Of course think that, your a victim of group think… You out yourself with this quote… “The books premise is a myth.” after typing this “I listened for an hour to your link to audio book The Crowd Gustave LE BON (1841 – 1931)
It had no relevance to me, and did not ring true to my simple mind at all. People don’t want waror revolution and destruction.” You obviously do not comprehend it so don’t label it as myth. If you took away from it that “People don’t want waror revolution and destruction” it flew over your head. If you have some question or comment fine, if you throw shit accusations I’ll throw shit right back. Peace if you want… up to you.
🙂
Martaine~
Thank you for the source of quote and explanation of how “Group Think” takes hold and keeps the Group within the Group. Exactly!, the Group agrees to Lie to themselves… but there’s something more here. Almost as if they began to believe the Lie even before they are officially in a group…. that first “Group” being the first time they are in a social setting on their first day of pre-school. Prior to pre-school they have the TV telling the ‘they way they should think’ and to believe the Lie.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
Kimberlie—
I agree with you. We are told the Lie from day one of our existence. And should anyone not get the programming right and insert a Truth instead of the generational Lie, we will be viewed as not conforming to the Group and people will say we are crazy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSVMG_cVFS4
the DoD should bought some TV…it seem the television is more informed then the military
Or would watching TV have only shown them the fantasy that they had created to air for the public through the media? Who knows if what aired on TV and what was actually happening live in NYC that day were remotely close to the same thing.
The movie “Forrest Gump” made the phrase “photographic evidence” an oxymoron . . . seven *years* before they hit the public road with the events of Sept. 11 2001. And I for one was still taken in, for a long time after.
What, specifically, *did* happen that day is trivia compared to the fact that what we were made to believe, by the people we trusted to keep us informed, *could not* have happened as depicted/reported.
Anyone insisting on any given scenario of what really happened is either hopelessly enamored of his own theories — or deliberately keeping attention off the betrayal of trust.
This is a very good point, and one I have considered myself several times. Ultimately, the only conclusion possible through examination of the materials available to the public is that the official narrative is garbage. Beyond that, any idea as to what actually happened that day is just speculation about what COULD explain the whole picture. The problem will always be that many explanations could explain the event, and without a way to definitively prove or disprove those explanations, it is a pointless exercise. I think Allan has referred to this being why he does not go much further than to point out the impossibilities of the video and official story. It is commendable that he does not go further and proof of his legitimacy.
Ditto. . . . . to both mellyrn and eric ….
True. We all for a fact. That what they say happened on 9/11 couldn’t have possibly happened the way they ( 9/11 Commission and NIST Report) said it happened because it not only violates the laws of physic but also common sense.
1) All alleged “hijackers” making it through security without anybody noticing they were carrying box cutters or knives.
2) Not a single plane that was allegedly hijacked squawked 7500 (hijack code).
3) All planes allegedly “hijacked” made circuitous routes to their targets instead of flying directly to them after they were “hijacked”.
4) All planes flown were flown in excess of their operating limits for their altitudes.
5) Death defying feats of aeronautical acrobatics that defied the skills of highly skilled Military Pilots by “pilots’ rated only for singled engine Cessnas.
6) The planes allegedly pierced reenforced steel and concrete without breaking up on impact as one would expect if the laws of physics applied!
7) Only two planes were able to totally destroy three targets i.e. WTCs 1,2 and 7.
8) One plane was able to bury itself deep into the Pentagon when in reality this is what should have happened:
https://youtu.be/l7eI4vvlupY
9) The fourth plane allegedly crashed into a Pennsylvania field leaving practically no debris. ( This actually can be applied to the other three as well.)
I could go on but the point is that the Official Story is in fact a carefully contrived work of fiction posing as reality.
On Wiki under “Immediate response” (10:20 am Dick wake up…lol):
At 8:32 am FAA officials were notified Flight 11 had been hijacked and they, in turn, notified the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). NORAD scrambled two F-15s from Otis Air National Guard Base in Massachusetts and they were airborne by 8:53 am. Because of slow and confused communication from FAA officials, NORAD had 9 minutes’ notice that Flight 11 had been hijacked, and no notice about any of the other flights before they crashed. After both of the Twin Towers had already been hit, more fighters were scrambled from Langley Air Force Base in Virginia at 9:30 am. At 10:20 am Vice President Dick Cheney issued orders to shoot down any commercial aircraft that could be positively identified as being hijacked. These instructions were not relayed in time for the fighters to take action. Some fighters took to the air without live ammunition, knowing that to prevent the hijackers from striking their intended targets, the pilots might have to intercept and crash their fighters into the hijacked planes, possibly ejecting at the last moment…
Why mindlessly parrot Wiki? Did I annoy you?
Actually he’s mindlessly parroting the 9/11 Omission Report with the added addition that Cheney issued a shoot down order of some kind with no evidence.
The fact is the last thing Cheney wanted was a shoot down order issued as it would have included cruise missiles fired as well aside from the fact that only the President could issue such an order which is why he kept Bush on the move in AF 1.
See Webster Griffen Tarpley’s Synthetic Terror:
https://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2005/07/317436.pdf