Note (Wednesday AM, about to hit the road): I see there are quite a few comments. I’ll have to read them later; in fact, I’m looking forward to it based on the one I scanned from berger. Talk about desperate. Really amusing. I appreciate the interest, folks!
As I write I’m even farther (further?) from the Ranger Station wifi, so my walk tomorrow to see how things are going online will be about twice as long. Gus will love it; the doggy-sniff world up here at 8,000 feet-plus is apparently hot stuff. I sometimes wish I knew what was going on in her little doggy-mind when she’s nose down, tail erect and wild-eyed on some ??? trail. I mean, is it like a good novel or movie for me? (Do visual images conjure?) Is there an actual story in the floating molecules? Some canine version of endings are everything?
Addendum: Maybe Gus’s snoot-trails are like me when I’m full-bore into an online ‘search roll’ and on the verge of an a-ha! gotcha! Experience.
But I ramble. What I was getting at: I’m getting to like not being able to go online at any time – no chance at getting cyber-aggravated via a ceceitful comment or bad-news-email or even a news flash — although the down side is there too. Mainly access to needed information, real or otherwise. As I’ve said many times, occasionally the Lies infer important truths. And holy shit is the online world full of Lies or what?! (Seriously, Youtube ‘science’ vids… 99% untruths. No exaggeration. TED TALKS?… 90% untruths. Joe Rogan… shoot me a high number here.)
Just FYI, as I write I’ve read the first 6 comments to my last post, and I want to explain something before we really know that ‘les berger des whatever’ is a professional mole, an agent of the state. I mean, I pretty much know he is, but as one of you commented, proof is everything. Everything. (Like endings.) On this blog, there is proof and then there is proof.
But we’ll see how it goes with berger. I’ve really thrown down the gauntlet with this guy, haven’t I? A hundred bucks (which, I assure you I will pay if he comes up with the proofs), plus… well, read his last few comments. Believe me, an ego is very much at stake with this scumfuck. He’s been trained in NLP (by my definition), overlooked by handlers, told how to react to cause the most doubt/misdirection/deceit and so forth. I can’t go back and look right now, but this persona has been commenting on my blog… for months… I think… I’ll check, but think of the work he put in to get ‘trusted’…. All gone now. He’s fucked.
The way it is for me, the way I left it (with my last post), there is no excuse whatsoever for ‘berger’s failure to provide the asked-for evidence of his veracity. (A few screenshots that should be handy, or easily attained via his ‘brother’.) Do we all agree on that?
Good.
I have to ask, and please do answer if you don’t mind: How many of you were sure he’s dirty? Or just suspected it? I’m talking about before my last post – which didn’t contain any new information; nothing unavailable to you with just a liiittle thinking. And more importantly, how many maybe read his last few ‘sincere’ comments and were thinking, ‘Maybe Allan is getting a little paranoid’?
This would be a help in making my point that this matter of state moles on ‘truthy’ blogs is important, and my getting pissed off is a correct reaction: Scumfucks like this guy are really no different from participators in false flag events, for example. Anyone who lies to you as a matter of course, as his job… if you don’t get pissed off, whatsamatter wid you?
Let’s assume that no ‘proof of truth’ is forthcoming from this guy (although who knows what gender ‘berger’ is, or even if he/she/it is human). Let’s assume there is no real response, or that the response is as ridiculous as his ‘brother’s’ photo analyses, and you all or most of you all comment that he’s a dirty scumsucker and that he should go away. (Please do so if you feel that way!)
If this happens, believe me, it’s a victory for our side. He/she/it may even get yelled at, by a handler. I mean, look at his last comment, the desperation in all that drippy sincerity (being offline, I can’t paste it). This, by the way, is one of the ‘tells’ you should be aware of. Wordy, sincere crap. They get wordy, they’re getting desperate. Think about it, would you spend time trying persuade someone you don’t know how honest you are? They think you’re lying and you’re not, fuck ‘em! Right? Why waste your time on jerks? So why did berger do that?
Or wordy hostile/accusatory bullshit like I’ve gotten from scumfucks like Miles Mathis, Max Igan, James Corbett, Simon Shack, that Forum Borealis creep, and so many others.
Those of you who had doubts and wondered if berger was right – believe me I do not hold it against you – I can only hope that this issue (yes, this one outed mole) nudges you a bit toward what has become the purpose, the raison d’ etre, of this blog: Cluing you in on just how surrounded we really are.
Plus the magnitude of the Lies. You may think you know (the surroundedness and the magnitude) but you don’t.
By the way: Evolution. Boy, have I been reading books on evolution. Got to get back to that. Maybe soon.
Speaking of Lies.
Allan
Right: How the fuck do these people live with themselves? That’s the scary question. ‘Berger’? Want to chime in here?
Addendum: One tiny little detail about Spacex (which, actually, is pretty much a QED that it’s a fraud): You can tell where the cameras should be mounted from the angles in the Spacex video (or in all their ‘mission’ videos). Yet when you look at exterior shots of the booster and the capsule, there is no ‘bump’ or any indication whatsoever that there is a camera there. When you look at their videos, from the angle looking down – and how much you see of the booster – it’s obvious that the camera should be visible via exterior shots. Yet it is not. There is no camera mounted on the Spacex boosters. (Since I can’t go online at the moment, do your own search for imagery of the exterior of the booster; you’ll see there is no camera – and it cannot be mounted flush and still give the downward view you get.)
Spacex is like 9/11: there is not one aspect that isn’t a fraud. One more time: Where is the ‘alt media’ in this?
Appreciate your efforts to expose the trolls but I get the sense that most of the people who read your blog can see them a mile away. In my humble opinion your time would be better spent trying to raise discernment by sticking to your thoughts around hrtwrw. Since the photons clown has dragged u in emotionally I would rather expect his potential boss to be pleased.
Curious to hear your thoughts on the Tracy Twyman ‘suicide’ and her work in general.
Appreciate your efforts to expose the trolls but I get the sense that most of the people who read your blog can see them a mile away.
what a stupid statement. If Allan’s getting trolled by me (he’s not not according to the definition) it’s because he’s wronged me because he made an error in HTWRW>
In my humble opinion your time would be better spent trying to raise discernment by sticking to your thoughts around hrtwrw. Since the photons clown
You’re calling me names? Allan has mistreated me by publishing my email after calling me a liar with no substantiation and calling me a mole again with no substantiation.
You doofuses in this blog are just always shooting the messenger.
has dragged u in emotionally I would rather expect his potential boss to be pleased.
I’m my own boss you doofus. I”m just a guy sitting in front of a typewriter who made the mistake of trying to help allan (discreetly) correct his errors in the spacex fraud that he’s been working on for a year. No good deed goes unpunished.
Curious to hear your thoughts on the Tracy Twyman ‘suicide’ and her work in general.
Dude you missed the point of my post completely. I apologize for calling you a clown and deserve the doofus ad hominem but understand however that my intention in writing the comment had zero to do with you.
Hey le berger des photons, when Allan posted that he had given up on his boat and his RV was in need of repairs, I immediately sent him 100 bucks (the least, and also the most I could do) . So in a roundabout way that is my money you are so eager to get your hands on. You’re welcome. Now please, and kindly, shut the fuck up.
Send any proof that you think you have to my personal email – onslowbay@yahoo.com and I will verify that you have earned it.
Hopefully that will satisfy you and end your ridiculous ramblings. Yeah, Allan probably misjudged you as a mole and screwed up by posting your email. But who really gives a rat’s ass? And how do you have the time for this nonsense? Don’t you have a job?
On second thought, don’t answer any of that. For the love of God, please don’t answer.
And Allan, please be more careful with your money…
“who really gives a rat’s ass?”
– Clearly both of the main parties involved care…and I’d say that anyone else who has taken to the comments in support of either side of this “battle” care as well. Though, interestingly, those who appear to have been proven wrong have suddenly lost interest, and appear to have resorted to attacks of character.
“and how do you have time for this nonsense? Dont you have a job?”
– these kinds of questions are, obviously, totally irrelevant to the matter at hand. But they are typical of those who are desperate to stay on the attack, once proven wrong.
“Berger” could be unemployed or a millionaire, it doesn’t matter in the least.
He/she felt compelled to defend himself, and felt attacked by multiple people here. So be it.
His mistake was in believing that a “victory” in this matter, would change anything about the community here.
Hunting, and weeding out “moles”, “shills”, “agents”, etc., is a huge part of what this community is about.
Will anyone here go back and re-examine *why* everyone was so convinced that this “berger” person was a mole, and think about their own mistakes in that interpretation, and change the way they approach the issue going forward?
We’ll see.
But I doubt it
The paid shill meme is too important to just let go, or ignore. If there are moles, shills, etc, and they are visiting here…well!…that just legitimizes things here, doesn’t it?
Allan must be on to something if he is being harassed so mercilessly by all these agents, right?
So you can keep on vilifying this person, if that makes it easier to disregard the mistakes and assumptions you made. But, really, nothing about the way he is or acted, or said, mitigates your own behavior.
But, who gives a rats ass, right?
No one, really
Thank you. I’d been alone here with allan and his acolytes. I appreciate your effort. Yes I know you didn’t do it for me.
Why can’t or won’t he see that him being mad at me is a direct result of his error of believing that I’m a mole?
I’m honestly trying to help him see himself. I think you’re right that he’ll resist.
He doesn’t get it that with his acolytes he’s drawn down to the level of the bandwagon fallacy automatically.
Why bother with all the above. Write about what you see at the Ranger station, above 8000 feet, the travel to get there, the weather. ANYTHING except this childish uneducated, full of logic errors, arguing. You USED to be able to write about something worth reading. Now its nothing but rants that are full of eccentric subjects and sentences.
The vast, vast majority of us are here BECAUSE of the topics Allan analyzes and the frauds he exposes via his very well honed powers of observation and critical thinking. Why are you here Mary Louise???
you seem to have trouble reading with comprehension. Logan.
Mary Louise is here to see nature photos and videos.
she wrote it in the message you’ve responded to.
You seem to have the right quantity of intellect to be a follower of the shmuck.
we are all nutcases, but this guy is pretty aggressive …unless he really needs a financially struggling travelling artists $100… in which case the time he/she spends here would be better spent finding employment;)
Allan, if you’re going to take excursions into dialogue with commenters, perhaps you can reserve bestowing that privilege upon the ones who are literate and coherent (and have literate & coherent brothers, uncles, etc.)?
Failing that, can we please quote unambiguously?
Try using speech marks, as in “Blah blah”.
Frank, he was a “legend in his own mind” Troll (living the life in France he said :-D), but a big FAIL of a Buffoon/ Numbskull.
HE was the one who started with the personal insults, and he got a little bit of his own medicine thrown back at him – and he went Mad! LOL!….
see what happens when you feed the trolls? lol. Never mind. It’s still fun and entertaining, no? I envy your life style Allan. All the views, the stars, which i love the most. This is a great way to live out. I still have to work for a living at least for a few more years and can’t do it like you do. I wish I could.
As for the Michelangelo, why don’t you just overlay the picture where you think Adam is not looking up to God with the other one. The screenshot from Rosemary’s Baby is a different picture, a copy, not a very good one. I have a DVD with an old Encyclopedia Britannica on it and it shows the same what Google shows today. But it’s a digital PDF file not the original printed Encyclopedia. May not be reliable. I also have some older books from the 80-s about paintings and art and they show the same. I mean, Adam is looking up to God but he’s still looking God in the eyes. What’s wrong with that?
I’m doing my best to prevent any more crapola from this nutcase. I’m marking them as Spam when they come in and when I can get online. This is what I get for allowing comments. I will wrap this up tomorrow. Sorry folks.
Just FYI, I’m not reading any of your ramblings. My time is important to me. But I will have something to say soon, as a post.
just FYI, I’m not reading any of your ramblings.
Don’t worry about it. It’s not for you. It’s to humiliate you in front of anybody silently reading this blog who isn’t one of your doofus acolytes.
My time is important to me.
this from the guy who last month said he was going to kill himself if his truck’s prognosis was bad.
But I will have something to say soon, as a post.
Take some enzymes to help you digest that humble pie or you’re going to continue looking like a mean idiot.
You are DERANGED, and Angry about god knows what really!
If you went to see a head doctor, as soon as you turned up outside their door, they would immediately pull a lever that opened a trap door under your feet!!
Shit, I’ve got to go do some work.
It’s quite amusing to me to think how you’re thinking about me between rest areas up in the mountains where you are.
Is your upcoming post going to contain your admission of how you lied to me? how you accused me of lying with no proof? How you’re too lame to open an attachment after receiving it?
The only thing you can cling to is to continue to claim that my brother’s analysis of your analysis of those images is faulty.
For me, you’ve done some hand waving, but no more.
I told you in an email what was wrong with your analysis of his comment.
Share that with your acolytes.
^^^ What a Wanker ^^^
The sooner Allan banishes you, the sooner the world will be a better place.
^^^ What a Wanker ^^^
The sooner Allan banishes you, the sooner the world will be a better place.
——————————————————————————————————————
Nice comeback brett. I just ripped you a new one by using your own profound ignorance against you. I was talking about this situation with my son.
I wrote: I”m starting to think that I just beat a senile old man with nearly debile acolytes out of a 100 dollar bill because my mind still works better than his.
Brett, as wonderful as you think your blind, dog-like support is for Alan, it’s totally worthless unless he’s tolerating you because you give him money.
Logically, that must be what’s going on here.
He shouldn’t worry so much. People as stupid and emotionally crippled as yourself will surely keep on giving him money even after you know that he’s just an egomaniac incapable of admitting when he’s wrong in a gracious way.
Go tell someone who gives a fuck.
You sad, insulting, Stupid Bastard TROLL!
(opps back to work!..)
I pulled over at what might be my last net connected area. I had about 20 emails from this guy and could not deal with them, then found one with a screenshot that may be what I asked for. I have to blow it up and sharpen it. Meanwhile, ‘berger’ might just be a nut case with a brother who cannot write a coherent sentence and knows nothing about photography. So I may have been wrong about his being a mole. Welcome to the Internet.
I may owe him 100 bucks. That’s life, folks.
Allan, I wouldn’t trust a single thing this obnoxious, time wasting, nutty TROLL , sends to you, or says to you.
He is one of the worst type of entities I have ever come across, in my books.
Even if he had a bonafide letterhead (hard to prove, he could easily make it up), he doesn’t deserve a CENT, for wasting time and electrons on your excellent blog.
I would never pay him in a million years. He should be paying YOU.
Loving your writings & locations etc 🙂
I know, but that’s the chance I took when I asked for proof. The crap may be bogus but I asked for it, and got it. More tomorrow.
I know, but that’s the chance I took when I asked for proof. The crap may be bogus but I asked for it, and got it. More tomorrow.
You’ve been doing a good job lately of showing that you’re not the man for the job of determining if my “crap” is “bogus”.
let’s hear you admit out loud that you lied to me when you published my email address.
It seems he is quite a successful troll.
He continues to draw your attention, you even wrote part about him. I guess this took hours, including the previous contemplations.
I got to ban you, man. You are probably not a mole but you are nuts and nobody wants to hear another word.
This fucking nutcase is going to have to go. If anyone objects to my banishing him from this blog, let me know. Here is my email to him:
(there are no attachments to this email and the other attachments are meaningless)
I’m waiting for a screenshot of your ‘brother’s email with his photo analysis, and proof he is a pro photog, and that he has the same last name as you, and is the same person in the letter head. if you don’t send that stuff, i will banish your sorry ass.
You are wasting everyone’s time. I do not have the time to read your crazy ramblings. Got that? just send the documents.
You may not be a state mole — your messages are too erratic. Perhaps you are just a nutcase. In either event, send the material or you are banned.
I may not have a Net connection for a few days. Not sure. Not important. Blab all you want but be advised that you have not sent the proof I asked for. The 4 documents you sent do not prove ANYTHING. They are meaningless. How hard is it to send an email screenshot?
allan