I wrapped up a recent post by claiming that I know more about HTWRW than almost anyone on the planet and no one called me on it. I dunno what to make of this. Either you guys are not really paying attention, or (as a group) you agree that I’m that… smart.
Since the context was my attempt to feel ‘successful’ in life, even considering my situation as ‘homeless’ and close to being broke, financially, maybe you guys just didn’t want to embarrass me by pointing out the sad state of my life.
This has distracted me to the point where I want to explain myself, not only what I really mean, but why I’m pretty sure my braggadocio is well-earned. (This in spite of the inarguable fact that in some sense I’m not as ‘smart’ as I was a decade ago.)
So I’m going to wrap up this Miles Mathis matter rather more succinctly than I probably should: MM’s recent claim that the space shuttle program was ‘fake’ is so loaded with implications – not only about the nature of ‘space’ and the lies we’ve been subjected to about it, but about the agenda behind those lies – that by not digging deeper into the matter I’m letting slide a multi-layered aspect of HTWRW.
‘Eyewitnesses’ was the hint I gave about my problem with MM’s ‘thinking,’ but as you’ll see in my brief comments, there isn’t anything about his essay that passes any sort of sniff test.
Here we go:
The Space Shuttle Program was a Fake
by Miles Mathis
First published June 30, 2019
The Mandela Effect project is now really blowing up in their faces, since the last thing they wanted me (or anyone else) to do is look closely at the Space Shuttle program. ANYONE WHO MANAGED TO GET THROUGH MM’S ESSAY ON THE ME CAN SIMPLY GO TO THIS VIDEO I DID ON THE SUBJECT. But by including Moonraker in their list of Mandela Effects, they led me into this one themselves. In researching my recent paper on that, I had to go to Youtube and watch the official theatrical trailer from 1979. And of course that reminded me that this Bond film was made to sell the Space Shuttle program going online in those years. So one fraud keyed me into another. SINCE THE ME IS A TRUE INIGMA AND NOT A GOVERNMENT PSY OP, THIS LAST SENTENCE IS PURE STRAW MAN. (IF MM CARES TO DISAGREE HE CAN START BY EXPLAINING HOW ‘SEX IN THE CITY’ SUDDENLY BECAME ‘AND THE CITY,’ AS REFLECTED IN THE ABOVE VIDEO.)
I have no intention of showing that Space Shuttles never existed, or only existed as holograms or something, from a parallel universe. THIS SENTENCE IS A REAL HOWLER: AS WE’LL SEE, FOR THE SHUTTLE TO BE ‘FAKE’ (WHICH IS IN HIS TITLE), THE SHUTTLE PRETTY MUCH HAS TO BE ‘HOLOGRAMS’… OR SOMETHING. That is not what I mean by fake. AHHH, THE HEART OF THE MATTER. JUST WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY ‘FAKE,’ MILES? The planes certainly existed: I saw one being carted around on a 747 in Texas back in the 1980s. What I mean is that the planes were another massive fraud upon the taxpayers, doing nothing taxpayers wished to see done, little or nothing that needed to be done, and few or none of the things we are told they did. NOTICE HOW VAGUE HE IS HERE. HOW DOES HE KNOW WHAT THE TAXPAYERS ‘WISHED TO SEE DONE’ OR ‘WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE’. They were supposed to help launch various satellites, but we now launch satellites quite easily without them, and much more cheaply. Each shuttle launch cost almost $2 billion in today’s dollars, which is no bargain. IT’S ‘NO BARGAIN’? DOES THAT MAKE IT ‘FAKE’? Over $200 billion was spent on the program over three decades, and what do we have to show for it? Some museum pieces. A handful of chubby planes that never got out of LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and that haven’t morphed into more useful tech. WAIT, HOLD ON! MILES IS TELLING US HERE THAT THE SHUTTLE DID GET INTO ORBIT (LOW OR HIGH, IT GOT INTO ORBIT, ACCORDING TO MILES). HE SAW IT WITH HIS OWN EYES AND IT GOT INTO ORBIT, SO HOW WAS IT ‘FAKE’?
MILES GOES TO GREAT LENGTHS TO SHOW US THAT THE SHUTTLE IMAGERY IS FAKE, WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY TELLING US THAT IT DID GO INTO ORBIT, WHICH IS WHAT WE WERE TOLD. (KEEP IN MIND THAT I’M NOT SAYING IT WENT INTO ORBIT, MILES IS.)
IF IT WENT INTO ORBIT, HOW DID IT GET THERE? MUST’VE BEEN… LAUNCHED INTO ORBIT, LIKE THE (FAKE) IMAGERY INDICATES.
OR IS THERE SOME OTHER WAY TO GET INTO ORBIT, MILES?
ANOTHER WAY TO PHRASE IT: WHY WOULD THEY FAKE THE IMAGERY IF THE THING DID GO INTO LOW EARTH ORBIT?
AGAIN: I’M NOT MAKING CLAIMS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER RE THE SHUTTLE. I’M ONLY POINTING OUT THE PROBLEMS IN MM’S VERSION OF CRITICAL THOUGHT.
We now know that the Apollo program was an even more massive fraud, and that no one ever went to the Moon. That is what I would call common knowledge, although the governors wish it weren’t, and pretend it isn’t so. They are still trying to sell it, but have very few buyers outside of their government, university, and military hires. ADDING THE APOLLO FRAUD HERE WOULD BE OKAY IF HE WAS MAKING THE POINT THAT THE SHUTTLE DID NOT DO WHAT IT WAS BUILT FOR (GO INTO ORBIT), BUT HE’S TELLING US THAT IT DID GO INTO ORBIT. THAT IT WAS NOT COST EFFICIENT DOES NOT MAKE IT ‘FAKE.’ IF THIS WERE THE CRITERION FOR ‘FAKE’ THEN… SAY… OUR HIGHWAY SYSTEM WOULD BE ‘FAKE’.
We also know the more recent SpaceX launches are fraudulent. They are so poorly faked even school children can see the seams. HERE I SUSPECT THAT MILES IS REFERRING TO ME (CALLING ME A SCHOOL KID), SINCE ASIDE FROM FLAT EARTHERS, NO ONE ELSE HAS EXPOSED THE SPACEX FRAUD. They have rockets flying backwards and landing on tiny spots in the ocean, while paid crowds of college students, meth heads, and gangbangers cheer and high-five. HERE’S WHERE MILES’S MISDIRECTION/OUTRIGHT DECEIT IS MOST OBVIOUS, AND IT APPLIES TO HIS ‘SHUTTLE FAKE’ AND ‘SPACEX FAKE’ CLAIMS. HE IS IGNORING THE POINT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO MAKE FOR OVER A YEAR. NOT ONLY IGNORING IT, BUT MISDIRECTING US FROM IT.
EYEWITNESSES. BOTH THE SHUTTLE AND THE SPACEX LAUNCHES INVOLVED THOUSANDS, TENS OF THOUSANDS, OF EYEWITNESSES, INCLUDING SCADS OF ‘AMATEUR’ FOOTAGE, WHICH CAN BE SEEN ON YOUTUBE AND ELSEWHERE.
YES, MILES, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO LAND A BOOSTER FROM SPACE BACKWARDS ONTO A SMALL SPOT IN THE OCEAN (OR ON LAND): THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR VERIFYING THIS TRUTH I’VE BEEN YELLING ABOUT FOR OVER A YEAR.
IS MILES SAYING THAT THE THOUSANDS OF EYEWITNESSES (OF THE SHUTTLE AND SPACEX MISSIONS) WERE ALL PAID GOVERNMENT STOOGES (paid crowds of college students, meth heads, and gangbangers…) YEP, I BELIEVE HE IS. IN HIS MANDELA EFFECT DOOZIE HE CLAIMS THAT THE SPOOKS BREAK INTO HOUSES WHERE VHS TAPES OF MOONRAKER (WITH DOLLY’S BRACES) ARE LURKING AND SWITCHES THEM WITH ALTERED TAPES! AND THAT GOES FOR ALL OF THE ME MOVIES (‘LUKE, I AM YOUR FATHER,’ ‘LIFE IS LIKE A BOX OF…’ ETC., ETC.)
THE PSY OP THAT CALLS ITSELF ‘MILES MATHIS’ HAS NOW GOT TO THE POINT WHERE IT POSITS PURE ABSURDITY, ASKS ITSELF IF THAT IS POSSIBLE, AND ANSWERS, ‘YEP.’ GO LOOK AT THE MANDELA ESSAY:
‘So am I saying the CIA/MI5/Hollywood has altered all copies of Moonraker they could find? Yep. Am I saying that the spooks are in control of every copy of Moonraker… Yep.’ OTHERWISE – IF THEY DIDN’T GRAB EVERY COPY, WE ALL WOULD HAVE SEEN THE DOLLY’S BRACES VERSION (THE ‘ORIGINAL’) ON YOUTUBE.
POINT BEING: THE ONLY WAY TO EXPLAIN THE LAUNCH EYEWITNESSES IS IF THE LAUNCHES WERE… WAIT FOR IT… HOW DID MILES PUT IT… ‘HOLOGRAMS OR SOMETHING.’
BUT HE’S NOT SAYING THIS! HE’S DENYING IT. THIS IS HOW MIND CONTROL WORKS.
Again: There is a lot more to ‘Mile’s Mathis’s’ essay but the above says everything ‘important.’ The rest is just more ‘evidence’ that the shuttle imagery is questionable.
Addendum: You have to actually picture what MM is telling us. Picture the tens of thousands of folks on the beaches of Florida, on their blankets, under their umbrellas, and so forth, waiting for a shuttle or Spacex launch. Now picture the spooks doling out cash, telling them to claim they saw… whatever… and getting them to sign NDA’s and threatening their kids and dogs if they spill the beans about… all this.
Really. This is how it must have gone, right? Either that or Miles’s bosses have perfected the art/science of holograms (or ‘something’) to the point where we literally can no longer believe our own senses. It’s one or the other, no?
Allan
I guess I wasn’t actually succinct here. I got a little carried away. This happens when I’m lied to on the level of a ‘Miles Mathis.’
In my next post I will try to explain why I think I know more about HTWRW than almost anyone else… on the planet.
40 comments for “A Question for ‘Miles Mathis,’ Part Two”