While (hopefully) we are all mulling over Friedkin/Letts’s Bug — and I am especially struggling with all the implications thereof — I thought I’d alert you to James Corbett’s extraordinarily well-wrought two-hour documentary on Bill Gates, which I have just finished. (It’s four parts total about two hours.)
You have to give Corbett credit for such deep research. I mean, were I to take on such a task, with one assistant, (in Corbett’s case, editor Broc West) this would have been at least a six month project, leaving no between-time to do anything else, like say, a daily posting of interviews/opinion podcasts/essays/etc, as Corbett does. After all, my 90 minute solo effort, Water Time took… well, years in the making. I guess that compared to Corbett I’m just…really slow witted.
Either that or — as with ‘Miles Mathis,’ another source of incredibly diverse and deep ‘truth-telling’ — Corbett gives the game away via his sheer volume of covert exposition. Make no mistake: Corbett’s many documentaries are chock-full of important information and are of high value to anyone with an interest in HTWRW…
But given the impossible output, plus the many important subjects he somehow avoids, plus, of course, the early 9/11 give-away (that he is a PTB asset) I exposed in 2015, presumably before Corbett learned to better disguise his ‘NLP’ (by my definition, but see this deeper analysis)… we have to ask ourselves what is the PTB-purpose behind all the bean spillage? What’s in it for them that we know so many nasty secrets behind Bill Gates? And, come to think, what do they get out of a movie like Bug?
One of the reasons I’m taking so long with the movie analysis is that it covers this very subject, i.e., how genuine and incriminating revelations (also like those found in Corbett’s work) could possibly benefit those who seek to do us (the human race) harm. The answer(s) goes beyond simple limited hangout — planting the misapprehension that the worst, the most revealing, of the truth has now been outed and there is no more to be seen here, folks. The devil is in the details kind of thing. And in the layers.
Yeah, information/storytelling like Corbett’s and Bug go way beyond that.
So please do take in the Corbett Gates exposé, as it is especially relevant in this age of engineered pandemics, the amped-up EM zapping of our biological essences, and the coming of forced vaccinations, but also keep in mind that as with the nearly ancient movie I have recommended (and asked for your views on), the real horrors lay several tiers down from the obvious, and from the information presented.
If you want to go deeply into Bug, think about Friedkin’s most similar effort… what did this one mean? What was it trying to tell us?
Speaking of Bug, I’m pleased to see that at least some of you are participating in my analytical challenge; I have been both surprised and unsurprised by the responses so far. Deeply so.
Aside from maybe learning something from you, a reason I’m asking (or insisting) that you view and respond to the movie is so my story analysis does not become tedious. If you’ve seen the film and been ‘forced’ to think about it, the details I go into may strike you as genuinely revelatory, as opposed to oh-hum nit-picky. Plus, if any of you are interested in the craft of storytelling, you may learn something. We’ll see.
The worst that can happen is you’ll have something to yell at me about.
Allan
Although I’ll be paying attention to the comments in all recent posts, put your analysis in the latest post (for now, this one). You still have a couple days before I get this right. I’m still scouring the Internet for someone, anyone, who understands what the story is yelling in our faces. And that includes the storytellers themselves. Where they are coming from in terms of intent is one of the layers that needs to be understood.
Addendum (a few hours later): The deeper I dive into Bug, the more I dissect its layers, the stranger and… more frightening it becomes. I think this will end up the weirdest post I’ll have ever done. I’m serious.
22 comments for “A Related Matter”