That this blog is a ‘wake up’ (written on the fly) premise reminds me of how I manage to get to sleep, which is by putting a podcast on next to my bunk. Usually about 10 minutes in I’m off to… wherever we go in sleep. Last night I made the mistake of using a Tim Kelly interview with Jay Dyer. (Truly, you want to hear a pseudo-intellectual reveal his ignorance, listen to the first 20 minutes of the podcast. You’ll also notice that — aside from letting Dyer say stupid things with no comeback — Tim Kelly can’t seem to enunciate multi-syllabic words and tend to ignore consonants. (‘Strategy’ is not pronounced ‘stragy’.)
Dyer’s continual repetition of his scorn for ‘boomers’ kept waking me up. Each time he said something to the effect of ‘what boomers can’t understand’ or when he did a dumb-ass ‘boomer voice’ saying something stupid, I’d wake up, thinking, ‘What?’ then ‘What a fucking idiot.’
‘Boomers this,’ ‘Boomers that.’ A boomer is a boomer. As if all are the same and all to blame for the catastrophic state of the planet. Is this guy, who is in his 30s, unaware that the mid-level technocrats who are physically — although they are puppets — the ‘planet runners’ are of his age group? That whaddyacall ’ems? Millennials is it? But defining people via the year they were born is moronic to begin with. To Dyer and his ilk, some advice: Go and live a life before you make a claim of wisdom.
Dyer is one of those who has a lot of ‘information’ but does very little with it. As mentioned in my over-long post a while back (my cutesy-clever title being ‘Dyer Straights For The Alt Media’), my problem with Dyer started when I met him at the Secret Space Program conference in 2015, in Bostrom, Texas. For a guy holding such disdain for ‘boomers,’ he sure seemed to think this boomer was ‘waay cool’ (his words) simply because many years ago I was a writer for an over-rated TV show. Aside from the fact that most if not all the other speakers at the conference are almost certainly limited hangout and/or full-blown disinfo agents, Dyer was deceitful in our subsequent correspondences (see my past post linked above).
I’m not going to burn more words on the guy. What makes him of any interest at all is how he’s suddenly managed to spew himself all over the alt media, which itself is usually a red flag. If you’re interested in him as a source of information, I suggest you plow your way through the above post before you take him even halfway seriously.
My daily routine has resulted in more than usual emails from you all. Most of them are ‘high quality’ messages, some extremely so. I liked this one, for example, for it’s brevity and flagrant imagery. It’s a reaction to a movie ending mentioned in my last post:
‘My take is we all have to crawl through a river of shit. Hopefully there’s a beach on the other side.’
Shouldn’t take too much thought to come up with the movie referred to… on the other hand, maybe it’s just me (to whom it’s obvious)…
I’ve been meaning to pass on a take on Clif High from someone I can vouch for and who is uniquely qualified to judge High’s merits (my thoughts in bold).
I, for one, think and feel he could be exceptionally legit/above board, but can also see the potential for him to be a total PsyOp. It’s a conundrum. Tell us something we don’t know! But read on…
Keep in mind that, in my previous career with DOD/DOS and other agencies, including the recruitment of human intelligence and all the counter espionage shit I did for many years, I was trained to assess people for motive/intent and integrity, and learned many tools related to NLP, integrity interviewing techniques, body language and intonation, etc. His qualifications are what makes this take especially worthwhile.
That said, I have also been watching Cliff’s reports (half past human web bot stuff) and interviews since 2010-11. I have MANY— Many hours of listening analysis to contribute toward your inquiry. This too is important — my research/inquiries have been mostly surface.
On the one hand, I wanna believe he is a totally true and straight up truther, who also happens to be a brain-iac analyst type with Uber high IQ. …Sort of an NSA-gone-straight William Binney-sort of guy. Wouldn’t that be nice!
Without going into laborious details, please take my word when I say I can cross- validate most of his claims and reported intel based upon personal experiential knowledge and correlation to other open source media/intel. …his shit checks out for the most part. Again, this is what I haven’t done in depth: Cross-referencing open source stuff and not finding conflicts or tells. With this writer I take it seriously.
Now— on the other hand— I am naturally jaded and suspicious, especially when he’s been around for so long, without much controversy or interference. That actually doesn’t bother me. I mean I’ve been around for a while too.
He alleges multiple attempts on his well being and attempts to capture/destroy his computer drives via break in at his home, etc, I cannot help but ask myself: “if he was really reporting true stuff and outing the bad guys, then wouldn’t they shut him down or otherwise attempt to censor/impede him more? Good point but then again they may not consider his information dangerous… or they may want certain stuff to get out. Keep in mind that one value a ‘real’ (not a LH) source brings to the PTB is that they keep track of who is listening and – just as important – what that person does after taking in the offered info. This may be why they haven’t bothered me. They want to see what effect I have (if any). For example, I bust Miles Mathis as an op, right? They want to know if that’s going to have an effect. Their A.I. will know, through watching your behavior. Or say you listen to a potentially explosive podcast by Clif High, then do… what?… this is info for their algorithm to chew on…
In other words, he might be a complete deep plant, long term sleeper type who gently weaves a narrative and submits ideas to the collective sub/unconscious via the reports and interviews. It’s tough telling what sort of effect Clif’s esoteric, counter-mainstream screeds will have. Might be just what they want, irrespective of their actual veracity. I’m pretty sure I’m right about Judy Wood, for example. These are complex issues; what’s ‘obvious’ may be the reverse on another level, or from the perspective of another faction of the PTB.
Conversely, he’d have to be pretty damn good to keep up his act so consistently and stay in character for so long. Also, there’s too many things he references from personal experience that simply cannot be faked without having first-hand knowledge/witness/experience. Yep. This is important. Thusly, he could very well be a legit, somewhat rogue, sovereignty-republic-seeking type who is an old school truther. In any event, he’s worth listening to… but have your salt shaker within reach…
All right. I’m going to give Clif a good looking-at for the rest of the day, plus you guys have provided me with links I’m curious about. Keep ’em coming, but remember that the stuff I write about is based on how I wake up. So don’t be offended if something you consider vital doesn’t show up here.
Addendum: Clif High has a way of combining woo-woo crapola-sounding stuff with a knowledge of deep physics that is either complete bullshit or… really interesting. A couple years ago I wouldn’t have burnt my time with him. But certain realizations have had an effect, one being this: There is a ‘higher power,’ folks, which seems to have an interest in what we humans are up to. That much I know. Plus, something with profound implications is going on in Antarctica and High seems to have some knowledge on the subject.
Allan
The continuing Unsubscribe rate means that your ‘Yep’ emails are especially important to me. Thing is, though, please do not email me more than once with ‘Yep’ in the subject box. You’ll only give me false optimism; plus, if I dump my provider you’ll end up getting multiple notifications in your Inbox, which would be annoying. (Yes, sending me a ‘Yep’ could result in your being ‘listed’ on some mammoth archive in Utah, and so forth, but if we let them intimidate us in this way… they’ve already won.)
The movie referred to above was of course The Shawshank Redemption. Crawl through a river of shit… beach at the end…