(Note: The camera data from my video are at the bottom. If you’re here for that, scroll down.)
I’m about halfway through the definitive work on the mainstream view of the Manhattan Project, a book called The Making of the Atomic Bomb, the audio version. Endless, over 40 hours, but very technical, which is what I was looking for.
Groves and Oppenheimer. These are the two who knew everything.
I’ll have to get back to you on this, but so far the stuff that bothers me (stuff indicating hoax) remains the same as always: First, I don’t like coincidences and the big one is that they just happened to finish the project right at the end of the war, after more than three years of trying. Just in time to ‘use’ it to supposedly finish off the Japanese while showing the Russians how bad ass we are.
Three years and you juuuust get there at the last second. Perfect timing!
One thing I’m looking for (in the books, etc.) is a verification that they didn’t have enough Uranium 235 (enriched U-238) to make more than one Uranium bomb. This is important because they claim that the one they tested at Trinity was of the ‘implosion’ type with a plutonium core.
Albert and Op. Be interesting to be a fly on the wall here.
Think about it. The bombs used two different elements to ‘chain react’ and two completely different triggering techniques. It’s almost as if the two bombs had nothing to do with each other. Almost. (The Hiroshima bomb was called ‘Little Man’, the Nagasaki bomb was dubbed Fat Man. This was based on their different shapes, and very different triggering mechanisms/theories.)
Point being that the first drop (Little Boy on Hiroshima) was of a bomb type that was never tested. This to me is the biggest red flag that something stinks. They claim they did it this way because they were so sure it would work. No testing needed. Keep in mind that one of the major issues was whether an explosive chain reaction was even theoretically possible. See, the chain reaction had to take place (completely) within a few millionths of a second. If it was too slow the core material would expand (a minor explosion) before the fast neutrons could do their work in splitting the billions of nuclei in the U-235 core.
The core was about the size of a grapefruit, right? The U-235 atoms are packed very tightly; they had to stay that way for exactly the right length of time. If, in a millionth of a second after detonation the core has expanded to, say, the size of a basketball, the bomb might be a dud. A minor poof, if a nasty one. No ‘kiloton-class’ explosion. And they never did a full test until Trinity. And they had no way of knowing how much expansion would take place at the start of the chain reaction.
Before Trinity, they had only ‘tickled the dragon’ by zipping two sub-critical masses together for an instant — this is shown clearly in Fat Man and Little Boy, when, due to a (fictitious) accident, my old buddy John Cusack gets a dose of radiation trying to prevent an explosive chain reaction.
Fat Man, the plutonium bomb.
They never created an explosive chain reaction in the Little Boy bomb design (which was basically a cannon shooting one sub-critical mass into another) until Hiroshima. IMO it was nuts to drop the first bomb using a design that was never tested. Full stop. Period. And so forth.
Come to think of it, what they’re saying — without actually saying it — is that they didn’t have enough plutonium for two bombs either. If they did, why wouldn’t they use the plutonium device (Fat Man) — which was supposedly tested at Trinity — at Hiroshima, since this first demonstration was supposed to be critical, not only to end the war (bullshit, IMO) but to scare the Russians? They knew that design would work because they had tested it! But, obviously, since the Trinity and Nagasaki bombs were both plutonium devices, they did have enough for two. Again, something isn’t kosher here.
This one really bugs me.
Anyway, their excuse that they didn’t have enough Uranium for two bombs had better hold up. So far in my research this isn’t clear. I’ll get back to you on it, but if the lack of Uranium turns out to be bullshit, logic tells us that in August of 1945 they didn’t really have a viable nuke. Trinity and Japan were faked.
Who knew? Who didn’t know? All dead now.
There is other stuff to look into — plus the idea that nukes are impossible in principal (likely because an explosive chain reaction is impossible) — but for me the dearth of U-235 is the biggie, especially given that they started to make the U-235 isotope in 1942, three full years before the (as it would turn out) ‘deadline’ of the end of the war. As I say, I’ll get back to you. (If they faked Trinity and Japan, this would rival Apollo and 9/11 for the Biggest Lie of all time, even if nukes were eventually developed.)
Addendum: So far in my reading I’ve come across a bit of circumstantial evidence that gives me pause: In 1942 Oppenheimer informed General Groves that they’d need what turned out to be way more Uranium than was ultimately necessary (by a factor of 10, I believe it was). So Groves should have geared up the Oak Ridge facility (where they made the U-235) for waaaay more than the amount they really needed. See where I’m going here?
Testosterone and brains.
I mean the one thing that would kill the project completely would be ‘not enough’ core material. And with three years notice, they are claiming they had juuuust enough. Not sure that I buy that.
#
I was a bit disappointed in the comments to my last post, as you may already know. I wish there was more thought on the real implications of The Moon Numbers (yes, some of you got it, I know). Someone was surprised, they said, that I already didn’t believe in a higher power. Talk about missing the point! First, at least for me, the difference between believing something and knowing it to be true is… fucking enormous. Secondly, the numbers tell us a lot about the nature of this higher power, stuff we did not know before. Also, that these numbers are so utterly obvious in their meaning begs another helluva question:
Why are you hearing this (presumably) for the first time from me? (I know, I ask this a lot.) I mean, isn’t this the ultimate in Big News? Why, at the very least, don’t religous/evangelical nutcases bring this up… at every chance they get?! Or even secular Intelligent Design believers (as I have been for a while)?
Seriously, think about it. This is about as strong a piece of empirical evidence as you can even imagine for the existence of an ‘Intelligent Designer.’ (Or, for me, evidence of Design, maybe without an actual Designer.) I’ve tried alerting the scientists who have proved neo-Darwinism to be a crock but have heard nothing back.
Addendum: Remember the movie Contact, with Jodie Foster. Remember how they knew that the message was from an intelligent source? Well this is exactly like that.
The problem with these guys is that they are almost all active Christians. Unfortunately, these very smart guys (they are all males) — like the folks at Electric Universe — talk a good ‘follow the evidence wherever it leads’ story, but they do not walk the walk.
They talk the talk about God creating us His own image, but they don’t really mean it. See, the Higher Power who is behind The Moon Numbers is not… Divine. Whoever/whatever arranged those numbers so they could not be due to chance or necessity really does have characteristics similar to us, as in the same use of logic and math to understand reality.
How to explain this, and meanwhile get across what it has to do with human nature?…
Okay, I read this excellent book called The Privileged Planet, by an astronomer and a philosopher, and their premise is that the universe has been… created (for lack of a less baggage-laden term) by an Intelligent Designer, and part of their evidence is how we get full solar eclipses. Yes, an aspect of The Moon Numbers.
Addendum: There is no religious mumbo jumbo whatsoever in the book, and the authors claim that their ‘spiritual beliefs’ do not affect their ‘science.’ To which I say, Give me a fucking break!
There’s an evolutionary biologist named Paul Nelson at the Discovery Institute, which harbors some very smart I.D. folks. You listen to him and he’s brilliant. Then you find out that ‘in his personal, spiritual life’ he believes in Young Earth Creationism.
In a debate I watched him assure us that this belief has no effect whatsoever on his science. And he really is brilliant. What do we do about a guy like this?
These guys make a big deal out of how unlikely it is that the moon and sun are of identical apparent sizes, which gives the perfect eclipse effect. They tell us about all the amazing science we get because of this ‘coincidence’ — the Intelligent Designer wants us to understand physics, is what they are saying. And yes, I agree with them.
Yep, you can take this one to the bank.
They even mention the ‘400 number’ — the moon is 400 times smaller than the sun but 400 times closer, which gives the effect. Then not only do these ‘critical thinkers’ not go any further with the ‘coincidence’ that the number is a round integer but they seem unaware of the other ‘canon of 400’ numbers that litters the math relating the sun, moon, and earth.
What the fuck is wrong with these guys? The proof is right in front of them! Not only proof of a Designer’s existence, but proof that he/she/it wants us to know of his/her/its existence!
But see, they’re Christians, and the God of the Old Testament would not work that way. ‘Doing math’ would make Him too much like us. See, we’re supposed to believe in God via faith alone. They don’t want no stinkin’ proof!
This kind of bullshit drives me up the wall. Really does. And when I get it from folks on this blog… that’s no help.
Addendum: Chance & Necessity. Say you flip a coin ten times and it comes up heads each time. Could be chance, right? Say you do it 100 times and it comes up heads each time. You know that’s necessity, i.e., it’s either a two-headed coin or some other shenanigans are going on. And if so, we know there is an intelligent agent of some sort behind it. To put it another way: Any two or more events will either be causally related (necessity) or not (chance). If neither is the case we got a stinkpot intellect in the woodpile. Get it?
Think of something that isn’t either chance or necessity and you will always come up with an intelligent agent of some sort as the cause.
#
Speaking of weird Higher Powers, two nights ago I did one of my night sky-lapses (I do it almost every clear night) and came up with an oddity. Take a look and then I’ll explain the camera/time details.
What would this have looked like if you were watching live?
Remember that this is a shitload of still images made into a video. Each ‘frame’ is ten seconds, with a one second break between frames. This is why you get a line, then a break, then another line.
Ten seconds of reality, but what is it?
You have to picture it as a little orb of light moving upward, as an airplane would. In fact, without that incredibly bright flare, I would pass this by as a plane. (Even though planes only show a steady white light when they are landing, and this object is not landing.)
In real life, this would have been in sight for about 40 seconds. It’s hard to tell how long the flash lasted, but no more than 2 or 3 seconds, otherwise it would be more elongated.
The other oddity is that whatever it is comes into view suddenly. If it was a normal aircraft it wouldn’t suddenly appear. I mean, Where was it before we start seeing it?
I have a lot of these. Some day I’ll put ’em together, make a movie.
Allan
Re. Phunkie’s point: “No matter the what, the idea of remembering feels more correct than learning.”
How could you remember *anything* if you didn’t LEARN about it at some point in time?
I’m not a no proof believer in anything
I prefer going with my multiple witnessing
Of supernatural events that I had
No control over. But, for me,
Seeing is believing leading to what was that?
I know it it wasn’t human or over the top
Science. But knowing. Knowing something
Someone started all this we’re suffering through.
Why, leads to reading a lot, not cherry picking, to
Prove my point of view or accepting anyone’s without
Investigating theirs.
Those that witness end up believing. The
ones that haven’t. They just don’t get it, yet.
Hi Allan,
Again, thanks for all your work!
Just when I thought there couldn’t be any more rabbit holes to fall down…I think you’re suspicions about the nuclear bomb coincidences, as well as the mysterious “numbers” defining our universe are very insightful.
Years ago a friend of mine had visited modern Hiroshima & Nagasaki, and I asked him how anyone could even live there after the atomic bombs; I mean what about Chernobyl…aren’t we told that it’s still a nuclear wasteland? His response was quick and assertive (because he’s an elementary school teacher)…”the bombs used had special radioactive material with a lesser half-life”…this is what he’s teaching our children. I didn’t buy his glib response then, but still don’t have a convincing answer.
Like the dude in the comments who believes that it must be real because: “The mushroom cloud following an atomic or nuclear explosion far exceeds clouds billowing from a normal explosion.”…really, and you know that, how? Sounds like something from the History Channel. Or is he an explosives specialist? Or maybe Elon told him…”we know it’s real because it looks so fake.”
Given that the only “evidence” we have to discuss this topic has been handed to us by the same folks from Lookout Mountain Studios who gave us the moon landings/ serial killers/ socially engineered culture/ and 911 etc. ..The lack of critical thinking is truly discouraging.
As to the “numbers”…a couple of decades ago when I believed everything mainstream science was shoving down our throats, I read a very stimulating book called “Just Six Numbers” by Sir Martin Rees. In it he explains all of the critical forces at work in our universe and how they are so finely tuned that “any” variation from them would render life as we know it untenable. Here is a quick synopsis:
http://www.dontow.com/2010/01/review-of-martin-rees-book-just-six-numbers-the-deep-forces-that-shape-the-universe/
His conclusions were A: this existence is random (as per the Darwinism) and if any of these magic numbers were different, we wouldn’t exist. B: An intelligent designer created it, and his personal favorite, C: this universe is only one in a multitude of universes where numbers could vary. Though I don’t really see a difference between A & C, and I’ve never understood the mental gymnastics of more than one universe…isn’t that a built-in logical fallacy?
Anyway, sorry for the long post, but what is most striking in Scientism’s religiosity is their adamant refusal to consider any concept of Intelligent Design. This kind of misdirection seems similar to their outright ignoring any research into an Electrical/ Plasma Universe. Maybe there’s a clue there…lies by omission. I also feel the same frustration with the religiosity of the creationists who all seem to be fundamentalist christians…can’t we discuss this from a rational, critical thinking, non-biased stance? What’s up with that?
Cheers,
Stephen
About Chernobyl (1986, three months after Fake Challenger) and its ‘nuclear wasteland’ Exclusion Zone, there are troubling oddities. i knew a Swede, son of a professional (Akademik) scientist, genuinely alarmed, as i take it was his dad, at the rad readings. Europeans were told to wash their lettuce (like, more vigorously than they would have anyway)–but where are those lettuce advisories now? And if the air-borne danger has passed, what about those cities downstream from the Sarcophagus, like Kiev? No wonder the Ukraine has gone Nazi–how much scrubbing is a leaf of lettuce supposed to take?
There are tour groups you can join ‘into the zone’ to snap eerie photos of abandoned Sozi playgrounds. Apparently this is OK as you won’t be in there long. Will they one day offer honeymoon packages–also OK, as you won’t be screwing long? In 福岛Fukushima they’re already ‘forcing’ people to reoccupy their houses, by ending the emergency social assistance by means of which they’ve lived elsewhere. And the government, in thrall to Tokyo Electric, says it will pour all the grisly water it’s been holding on site these eight years into the Pacific, which –so it goes– is dead anyway thanks to them. But meanwhile we’re supposed to read our power bills under these nasty LED light bulbs, because …
But getting back to Europe, the Zone is huge, and flouts borders. We got our first awed gawk inside when intrepid teams of Apollo-suited nature guys macheted their way in and snapped those eerie playgrounds, and –wait for it– wolves. Did the wolves have three balls, etc.? No. The wolves seemed to be doing fine.
And isnt that the point? This part of Europe has been re-wilded. if an everyday joe like you can take a tour, you can be sure Leonardo has long jetted in for a snort and a screw–and perhaps a spot of hunting.
Zones are being established in California, too, after all — not by meltdown but by laser fire, and not through steely mandate but calculating insurance.
Hey, Stephen, thanks for a great ‘comment.’ This is another one that is really inspiring. Put it this way: I definitely could not have said it better.
Hang in there, and please don’t be so shy about commenting!
all, right… Allan, I posted your Back to the Moon post on TBP.
I see that one of our regular writers, Hardscrabble Farmer, has made a tentative comment. If you want to engage someone whose opinion is well-informed and respected, it is his. If you don’t give a flying fuck?
At least I let you know. (I post there as M G)
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2019/11/27/back-to-the-moon/#comment-1853350
Thanks for popping on to TBP and engaging in a bit of discussion. I think, somehow, all of us truth seekers need to link up in cyberspace just to reassure one another we are all still here, unfazed by the Liars in their Lairs.
I want to share a comment that was on ‘Back to the Moon’ — some of you may have moved past it.
Also, a reader alerted me to a new book on the Manson ‘murders’ and it looks interesting. I’m sure it’s a limited hangout — it assumes the murders were real — but there’s a lot about CIA and op CHAOS in the blurbs, and in the reader reviews the only negatives are claiming ‘too much conspiracy theory’ so… we’ll see. https://www.amazon.com/Chaos-Charles-Manson-History-Sixties/dp/B07S84VPXK/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=chaos+tom+o%27neil&qid=1574873291&s=books&sr=1-1
I’ve got three books on the table at once. The above, plus The Making of the Atomic Bomb, plus The Case Against Reality; Why evolution Hid the Truth From Our Eyes, which is a pretty interesting look at consciousness.
https://www.amazon.com/Case-Against-Reality-Evolution-Truth/dp/B07VL5TCVF/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=donald+hoffman&qid=1574874384&s=audible&sr=1-1
Here’s ‘Phunkle’s comment:
Late chiming in Allan but wanted you to know that you are absolutely not alone in recognizing there is something grander at play. And like you my research and perspective seems to lean towards intelligence, although i try to remember that it it could be simply a larger “force” if you will that from my scope and vantage point appears intelligent.
My awareness came through researching quantum understandings, and looking at cymatics and sacred geometry. Which is why i like to include the notion that perhaps its a grander force (as opposed to intelligent), and its my scope of perspective that makes it seem intelligent. Like if a big bell was rung, and the various metals are vibrating creating all kinds of forms such as plants, animals and humans to emerge, and they are in resonance with one another so it FEELS intelligent, whether i am able to know that or not from where i sit. But when i talk with others about this, the word intelligence is often what flows out of my mouth.
When one looks closer at things, and digs into the numbers, or the geometries, one starts to understand there is something “beyond” the self that is embedding lots of intelligence and synchronicities into this thing we call existence. I’m hesitant to relate any human qualities or even name “it” but awareness of this grander “thing” feels important. Its like the awareness that while my physical container has changed all my life ever since being birthed onto this earth plane, whatever that is which looks from behind my eyes has remained the same. I’m hesitant to name that too, but being aware of it feels important. I’m not sure a human mind will ever be able to really understand it, being so much larger in scope than any one of us.
But it seems we can synchronize with this grander intelligence/force, as it is happening through us just like everything else. One last thought would be that it often seems we are in a process of remembering, as opposed to learning. Perhaps our species knew all this before, or perhaps its all coded into our systems and we’re finally tapping into the right code. No matter the what, the idea of remembering feels more correct than learning.
And at the end of the day, it seems important to remember that most of these things we take so seriously are often just silly human games. If one tries to control life, one will quickly understand its beyond being able to control. We “think” we know but we truly know so little. So, your blog is enjoyable for me because you both ask the questions and do the digging into HTWRW, as well as share about direct experience such as looking at the stars with your own eyes and riding a nice wave on the ocean. We can get lost in the mental picture of existence, but nothing replaces direct experience of being alive. Thanks for what you do and creating space for this type of sharing.
Awesome :-)…
Allan (and everyone else) you must read about the other grand secret under the carpet (maybe you already have & know all about) – DMT
It reveals the hidden dimensions, and it’s Life, Consciousness, and Sacred Geometry on Steroids. It’s so stunning and amazing, it can’t be described in words.
About DMT > https://youtu.be/P7Jzzx-AxBo
I have submitted a slightly truncated “Back to the Moon” to Admin at TBP. I hope some of TBP’s more nerdier and less mouthier commenters chime in.
Difficult to say for sure though it seems the object becomes stationary for a moment during the flare. If so I’ve seen this over the Oquirrh mountains (at sunset) in Salt Lake. An aircraft rose vertically out of the mountain (that may have just been my perception – Dougway is on the other side) then hold it’s position for several seconds while becoming a ball of light, then fade and accelerate to the north over the lake. Another and then another followed, about 6 in series. Not glare from the sun as I was viewing from the East. With it’s trajectory the one in your video looks like a rocket. Any bases or mountain ranges nearby?
If the bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were nothing out-of-the-ordinary, why did we leave those cities largely untouched during our bombing sorties over Japan? Clearly it was to evaluate the effects of a nuclear blast on an urban complex. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#Choice_of_targets
(And by the way, the claim that we dropped the bomb on Japan to shorten the war was bullshit: the Japanese were already suing for peace before we nuked them.)
“X” – wake up and smell the coffee.
And please tell me what for instance, what the Royal Families do (who have shares in the Banks).
And don’t get me started on the Rothschilds – AND the IMF , who rob YOU and us everyday, with their outrageous interest and Fees.
Speaking of the Royals, (just lately) it sounds like Prince Andrew can now sleep in and watch TV all day and everyday, while his money still rolls in….maybe stretch his legs out in the garden now and then.
Brett, I was pointing out that the degree of extraction is mindbogglingly colossal. As you observe, it occurs in a myriad of ways. However, I have not yet seen anyone go beyond observing it as mere theft/embezzlement, let alone getting close to conjecturing the purpose.
…That’s because it is simply one huge swindle & theft – nothing else. It’s all caused by GREED.
You have never investigated the dark & horned elephant in the room, – the world ponzi-scheme “monetary system”, the 2 most Sinister departments being the IMF & The Fed.
Look up – how money is created, and the history of the Rothschilds.
Brett, I’ve done all that, and got to the bottom of it. I suspect you haven’t, or you’d know it isn’t caused by greed.
I’ve only seen one thread on one forum (a couple of months ago) where one or two of the participants had the eureka moment and realised why this was all happening. And I’ve been looking for years for someone to address the ‘why’.
It intrigues me that it’s so apparently difficult for folk to even think about the ‘Why is this happening?’ question rather than remain indulged with ‘How much deception is there, what is fake and what isn’t?’
GREED is the common cause…carried out by the approx. 6% of psychopaths.
How would an implosion bomb “expand the core,” when all of the force is directed inward towards the core, until it reacts?
‘ALL the force is directed inward’? Well then an explosive atomic bomb is — according to your logic — impossible. I mean since ALL the force is directed inward. Maybe if you think your wording through, you’ll get it.
Yes, it is all directed inwards, until the nuclear reaction starts. That’s how it starts. That’s why it is called an implosion bomb.
You really don’t see that you are not making sense?
The reaction starts on the “peel” or very outside of the core. It creates an inward and outward pressure. The inward pressure keeps the unreacted core from expanding, so the entire core can react before any core expansion occurs. Think of a globe with arrows pointing inside, and outside. The inside pointing arrows are holding the remaining unreacted core together, preventing expansion.
Once the reaction occurs, it can’t be contained on the outside, and it goes boom. On the inside, the core is being squeezed, and held together until the reaction happens. So the reaction travels from the very outside of the core all the way to the center.
Precisely.
Chris might more accurately have described it as the INITIATORY force – resulting in the release of horrific forces we know all-too-well. (But we should be gentle with ourselves….apparently, we are unable to deal with this horrendous creation on an intellectual and emotional level….after all, we are contemplating the end of EVERYTHIING on this lovely blue-water marble…)
This guy has some serious reservations about the bomb and the chain reaction itself which he thinks to be impossible, no chain reaction= no bomb!
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm#intros
The problem with Anders is that he only makes bald assertions, with no evidence to back them up. ‘This is fake!’ ‘That is fake!’ and so forth, without pointing out the anomalies and nonsense in the official story.
(If they faked Trinity and Japan, this would rival Apollo and 9/11 for the Biggest Lie of all time, even if nukes were eventually developed.)
广岛 Hiroshima and 长崎 Nagasaki lie on the 33rd parallel; this is supposed to be why they were sacrificed by the Mason Truman — but it could also be an indication of shenanigans.
There was a news blackout around the bombings. Was it Wilfred Burchett who snuck in and broke the story of radiation sickness? We thought it was Pentagonian shame, pluckily popped — but it may have been onion peel. (Armstrong’s ‘truth’s protective layers’). Burchett the Assange of his day, passport revoked, reduced to living in Yugoslavia. Later photos of appalling burns are then on a par with Roswell saucer crash artifacts.
Surrender terms (pace jonathan, immediately below) could have included playing along with the story, the way the Nixon-Kissinger / 毛Mao-周Zhou talks in 1972 would secretly include playing along with Apollo as well as the distracting rapprochement of Eastasia and Oceania, to the detriment of Eurasia (and VietNam).
Now we know what some of those Lookout Mountain Studio films looked like. (How Marilyn Monroe would fit in remains to be seen. However note the deliberate association of sex with the Bomb, e.g. in the Bikini.)
The Michael Danielovitch ‘Douglas’ movie ‘Black Rain’ (1989), cementing the legend: he plays a white guy in Japan 40-some years after the Dirty Deed, deservèdly resented.
The eponymous Marvel-Disney mutant Canadian character in ‘the Wolverine’ (2013) survives the A-bomb and even protects the native fellow underneath him (as the scorched Virgin presumably did the churchyard grass blades) — this due to his ‘healing factor’, see, which also allows him to smoke cigars.
Just sayin’.
*Jonathan was but is not immediately below.
Excellent points! Esp the Bikini-sex connection, which I hadnt thought of, in spite of how obvious it is.
It is my understanding that the war was already over as the Russians took Japan out. They wanted to make a point supposedly and that was why they “dropped the bomb”.
I have never even considered that the “Bomb” was not as they stated simply because back then if it was on TV it was a fact.
The world has not changed much though hopefully people are more suspicious today.
Your mention of those shadows being nonsense was also a mind opener. That they show them on a wooden fence is so stupid yet never or rarely I guess questioned.
Good stuff.
Yes, Lookout Mt did the bomb films all right. If you look at the buildings disintegrating (with what we know now about trick photog) and so forth, we can see they are faked. Plus the shadow fakery. Why fake anything if it’s all legit?
Who designed the designer? (as in …what happened before that. before that? before that?)
Leave it to Mary Louise to come up with the ultimate tired cliche.
It’s still a good point, even if well known.
Your choice is a) energy/matter and lots of time, or b) An uncreated god.
Even the former leaves plenty of room for things such as pyramids and satellites to have been built/located by a ‘sufficiently advanced civilisation’ – which may seem godlike to a less advanced civlisation.
As for deceptions, motivation is the key. Why fake the atomic chain reaction? Why fake Apollo? Why fake terrorism? Once you’ve deduced the ‘why’, it can help confirm that a cabal would indeed go to such lengths.
Yeah, sure a cabal would go to these lengths. Absent that assumption, I wouldn’t bother with any of this stuff.
WHY?? – follow the money trail … and keep the power, so the money (and energy) keeps flowing.
That’s not good enough Brett.
The rich and famous get to live lives of luxury even WITHIN the system, even playing within the rules of a system that robs them blind (or at least their descendants).
People cannot comprehend any reason to extract so much from the populace, so they just assume that any peculation is just to keep dynasties in the palatial luxury to which they are accustomed. And yet, what is extracted is many orders of magnitude beyond that, beyond what would be necessary for a crypto-aristocracy.
And why, Allan, are you so comfortable with the idea that a cabal would go to such lengths? You seem to have accepted that as a given, rather than establish why…
X, what makes you think I’m comfortable about… anything? My goal here is simply to point out inconsistencies that few if any others have seemingly noticed.
As for your ‘cui bono’ comment, in this case (a nuke hoax) it’s pretty obvious, isn’t it? I don’t quite get why you keep repeating that we have to figure out the Whys? when they are quite obvious. Do I really have to explain why, for example, they would fake Apollo?
Allan, I haven’t see you address the whys at all, which is why it appears you are comfortable about them, i.e. that they have already been answered, or are so obvious there’s no point addressing them.
Just because we can only think in terms of beginning and end, before and after, doesn’t mean that forever doesn’t exist, or some other equivalent beyond our comprehension (or at least mine). The Designer didn’t necessarily need to be designed. I look into space and figure I’m looking into Forever – A concept I can label but can’t really understand. Perhaps it’s the same with the Designer? And perhaps this Forever is another blatant clue left behind that stares back at us nightly?
Yes, this is exactly what I have come to realize long ago too.
That was supernatural evolution. Any more questions?
For Marie ^^^^^
Mary Louise, time operates differently on the design side…
The mushroom cloud following an atomic or nuclear explosion far exceeds clouds billowing from a normal explosion. This is clearly seen on photographic evidence from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The idea that conventional bombing was used to create the devastation, rather than an atomic bomb, would be confirmed by eye witness accounts within the Japanese population. The damaged caused by the atomic bombs in Japan was greater than the extensive conventional bombing damage seen in many German cities. For the world to be told atomic bombs destroyed two Japanese cities and for Japanese citizens to know that wasn’t true AND not deny the atomic bombing means the whole Japanese nation must have been kept in a global news blackout: they must not have known what the rest of the world were being told. For decades! The reports of the numbers killed and reports of the injuries and ongoing health problems suffered by the populations of both cities could also be confirmed by those populations OR denied, if those reports were untrue.
One thing we’ve learned (I would have hoped) is that we cannot use ‘photo evidence’ to tell us anything. Aside from that, good points, if obvious. On the other hand, people have used a similar argument to buttress the official story of 9/11.
So I dunno. Still on the fence.
Hmmm….that might explain – in part – why the Japanese allowed nuclear reactors to be built on the most earthquake-prone country on the planet…although there were large demonstrations *against* these beasts prior to their construction, if memory serves…Can you say FUKUSHIMA, anybody???
I could not have described it better a long time ago.
Hey Anders, thanks so much for the work you have put into this subject and great to see you are still with us!
Anders, if you’re still here, how about giving us your best single piece of evidence that nuke chain reactions are impossible? (This question is serious; I am not trying to confront you.)
Hi , could that have been a plane , high enough and correct angle to just catch a bit of the sun and reflect it ? It seems the sun had just set . Thanks for your work it’s definitely important.
Good possible explanation!
No way was my light sighting a plane!.
Was your light sighting North in the sky by any chance?…then again it sounds like you weren’t too far past sun set.
Come to think of it, the flash appears too bright to be a reflection.
Didn’t Elon Musk recently launch dozens of satellites in one go, to spread 5-G wi-fi throughout the world? I’ve heard that astronomers are already complaining that his “brilliant” efforts are already mucking up viewing of the heavens…
Have a look at ‘Seal of God” F. Payne http://god-help.org/SealOfGod.pdf
That’s just intelligent design horseshit. “Oh, it looks complicated to my primitive brain, so someone exponentially smarter and wiser than me must have designed it.” Proving the Bible by using the Bible doesn’t prove anything other than YOU believe the Bible without question. Is slavery acceptable, on a moral level? Should women be subservient to men? How does sacrificing one person forgive everyone else’s sins? Why would it do that? Put your head down and be quiet! Don’t question.
Yep, definitely the Bible is a people CONTROL book, concocted by the money changers.
I never go near it for proof of anything.
Could you force yourself to a serious consideration of just one verse of the bible?
If so: http://www.whatabeginning.com/Misc/Wonders/P.htm
Hey Messi nothing wrong with a bible verse or 2 ; you just have to deal with it appropriately – remember Alan had a whole post, about 10 back on a particular verse and running it past some Amish folk
i specifically highlighted the book ‘The Seal of God’ because although its christian based it deals with the numbers Alan specifically refers to. Another one available as pdf is ‘In the beginning was information by Werner Gitt.
Your superficial three sentences dissing the bible doesnt relate to the topic at hand
Also if you haven’t already,
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm
The numbers are the biggest giveaway of ID, we get it everywhere, the golden ratio is probs the best place to start as it is a number that we recognise as beauty itself, even if we do not see the numbers we can’t help but like and appreciate the form those numbers take.
Take the design of cars, over the last thirty years as the designers became aware of the ratios that our subconscious can recognise as being correct the more cars are sold!
So having a good bias towards ID where does it leave us, with a vengeful/spiteful god or a couple of computer geeks looking in on one of there school projects, you see for me design leads me to simulation, if there is one simulation there has to be a thousand, although the purpose of said simulation could only really be for observation and gathering of data but to what ends is anyones guess.
I have thought about reincarnation and the endless loop that we seem to be caught in or at least told we are caught in until we learn that ultimate lesson, i think the ultimate lesson maybe that this is a sick game with someones else’s rules and that the game is rigged and if you figure that out you should bow out quietly, maybe this is why suicide is so frowned upon because it is the ultimate freedom.
It’s ok i do not yet have the courage to test this quite yet!
That thing in the sky from your vid(thank BTW) looks like a plane leaving a trail/chem.
I still think the best reason for the chemtrails is for better radar/radio coverage and the cover of the sun a secondary effect of the primary weapon, also quite sure that the HAARPs are more active than ever, this can lead to such discharges of energy/electricity as in your film, maybe a sprite(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper-atmospheric_lightning)
Wal Thornhill spotted the effects in my Sky Dance video as sprites but said it was very unusual to see them in a clear sky — maybe you are right about HAARP in that case, but in this one, it’s clearly not sprites. I sent it to Wal and we’ll see if he responds.
I agree. The various ‘sacred geometries’ and ‘golden ratios’ and Fibonacci symmetries are major tells of Design, with or without a Designer.
I don’t know what was going on in 1945, but Uranium is relatively common in the ground, and there is plenty of it. And it’s weird, because only when you bring up to the surface out of the ground, does it turn “BAD” (I don’t remember how exactly, read about it years ago).
Yes, I myself have seen that bright flashing light in the night sky on 2 occasions.
The first time I saw it (about 2 years ago), it flashed at me 3 times in a row (within about 3 seconds), high in the Northern sky, like a seriously powerful ship signal light, from a point in space or the galaxy.
A couple of nights later (after cloud had gone), I looked for it again in the same place, and straight away it flashed twice again!. An intense white light, Sorry I don’t know what it is.
Nope not Northern sky.
I have another video showing the flashing four times in a straight line. I should look for it in list…
Very interesting! … we don’t want boring plane reflections.
I will be having another look for the light, when I go up North away from the City here at Xmas. Will see if I can “call it”.