The levels of disinformation on ‘climate change’ that we’re so relentlessly subjected to can rise to the comical, depending on your sense of humor. A couple days ago I came across a piece in the media franchise that calls itself ‘Vice,’ and found myself giggling at their latest scare tactic, i.e., how the rising sea level is likely to cause a ‘nuking’ of the South Pacific based on leakage from the ‘entombed’ nuclear waste from the U.S. bomb testing in the 1940s and ‘50s.
Notice the greenery on this supposedly poisoned island…. you’ll see where I’m going with this.
During the Cold War, the United States nuked the Marshall Islands 67 times. After it finished nuking the islands, the Pentagon dropped biological weapons on the islands. Once the U.S. was finished, it scooped the irradiated and ruined soil from the islands, poured it into a crater left behind from a nuclear detonation, mixed it all with concrete, and covered the whole thing in a concrete dome. They called it “The Tomb.” According to a report from The Los Angeles Times, climate change is breaking that dome open. Rising sea levels and temperatures are cracking open The Tomb, threatening to spill nuclear waste into the Pacific Ocean.
Kwajalien, a.k.a. as Christmas Island, is the closest sea level station to Enewetak, where the ‘tomb’ is. Do the math: in the approximately half century since installation, sea level has risen about 3 inches.
Now the concrete coffin, which locals call “the Tomb,” is at risk of collapsing from rising seas and other effects of climate change. Tides are creeping up its sides, advancing higher every year as distant glaciers melt and ocean waters rise. [my emphases]
Problem is that the sea level in the Marshalls (see the graph) hasn’t risen more than three inches since the tomb was installed. So what we have here is another lie meant to scare us… this time about radiation. See, not only are we soon going to be up to our necks in sea water, but we’ll get irradiated too! All because of that nasty little CO2 atom (every sneeze brings us closer to armageddon).
But, wait, speaking of atoms, here’s the distraction – and in the category of ‘a lie about a lie’ — Vice’s latest also brings up the doubts any serious researcher should have regarding the veracity of the ‘nuclear bomb’ issue itself. I’ve covered this briefly in a long past post and will remind you of the basics. As I wrote recently, there is quite a bit of evidence – wait, it’s more than that, it’s proof — that imagery put out by the PTB that purports to show nuclear bombs going off is fraudulent.
Fraudulent. My old pal ‘Miles Mathis’ (a PTB deep psy op), as part of his honey pot dangle (to get you to trust him), gives us maybe the best short version of the proof of fraud. For those who want to dig deeper there’s a book called Death Object; Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax, by Akio Nakatani, an expert in multiple science-related fields. Akio takes you from the science to the psy op that was the Hiroshima and Nagasaki ‘nuclear’ destructions. A good book; I tore through it last night. (You can get it on Kindle for free.)
If you doubt me on this subject, I urge you to go the supplied links and see for yourself, but what the book reminded me of – and you should all immediately see the logic here — is what an atom ‘looks like.’ As you should already know, an atom is mostly empty space. Maybe you’ve heard the comparison with a sports stadium: If we blow an atom up to that size, the nucleus would be about the size of a large mosquito (depending on the size of the stadium), with the nearest electron circling in the cheap seats.
A nuclear chain reaction of explosive force is based on ‘fast neutrons’ striking the nucleus, which breaks apart, sending its neutrons off to hit another nucleus, and so on, i.e., a classic chain reaction. Do you see my point yet? No? Okay, are you picturing the mosquito-sized nucleus? What are the chances that any neutron is going to make a direct hit in that stadium-sized atom?
Watch this classic ping pong ball/mousetrap chain reaction. Now imagine if the traps/balls were 100 yards apart; how would the chain reaction go? This is not an unreasonable comparison and we know even from mainstream accounts that this issue was one of the biggie problems. What if they never solved it? Think about Apollo. (And read the Nakatani book.)
A ping pong ball chain reaction.
The above reminder of the scale of an atom is not meant to prove the point that an explosive chain reaction is very unlikely, but meant to get you thinking. What Nakatani does in his well-researched book – and does it better than anyone – is to show how the fraud almost certainly went down. In a sense, it’s similar to the Apollo fraud, in that the perps (those in charge of the Manhattan Project and the PTB above them) started out really trying to succeed in their endeavor; then, having realized that they would inevitably fail (due to the laws of physics), decided that ‘for the good of mankind’ they would fake success.
Given the situation (World War Two), we can almost forgive them here. Almost. What is harder to forgive – and ditto with NASA’s continuing frauds – is what they did next, i.e., continue and escalate their deceit to horrendous levels.
Addendum: Neither Akio Nakatani nor I am saying that nuclear power is a fraud. The impossibility is in the ‘explosive’ chain reaction that is needed to create a nuke as we know them. By the way, here’s a bit of Nakatani’s cv:
About the Author
From Wiki. Enlarge and read the caption. Now look at ‘Ground Zero’ under their feet. No crater, no ‘trinitite’ glass. The desert is unfazed! It’s just like the moonscape under the LM: no disturbance. This is an insult to our intelligences.
Akio Nakatani is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. His research interests include Stochastic Systems, Parameter Estimation, Stochastic Optimization, Monte Carlo Methods and Simulation, Neural Networks, Statistical Pattern Recognition, Statistical Image Analysis, Time Series, Graphical Models, Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models.
So keep in mind that I’m not saying radiation is a fraud, or, again, nuclear power. (On the other hand, listen to Galen Winsor talk about when he was a plutonium handler…)
The fraud is in the creation of an explosive chain reaction. What if it’s… impossible?
But see where digging into one lie (climate change) can lead you? The media psy op called ‘Vice’ dumps a whopper on us about climate change and the Marshall Islands (where the ‘nuclear tests’ took place), and I end up spending two days looking into an even bigger fraud.
I’ve said a few times that the Apollo fraud is the biggest in our history, given it’s philosophical, metaphysical, and
Remember these images of stuff disintegrating? Ever wonder how the camera stayed steady, never mind survived?
other implications, but I’m now starting to see the nuke fraud as number one on that list. I mean, think of the angst it’s caused over the decades since WW2. And the money, the tax dollars wasted, diverted to who knows where. And the continuing whoppers that were needed to keep the fraud going.
Addendum: The ‘cui bono’ in continuing the fraud is obvious. Not only the money, but the fear that the PTB do love so much to keep us under.
Yes, I realize that there are problems with this one, which is why I’m not calling it 100% or even 90% a done fraudulent deal, like the Apollo, 9/11, or even the Spacex frauds. But it’s up there, over 80% on my surety meter.
At Hiroshima, not only no crater, but no ‘bald spot,’ as their should be. Notice the poles still standing.
What are the problems? Mostly logistical and keeping a lid on it. Think of all the nuke weapons, the ballistic missiles, the B-52s, the… the… complications in faking all those H-bomb (‘thermonuclear’) tests in the South Pacific in the 1940s – ‘50s…
Addendum: Again, I’m not saying Chernobyl didn’t happen, or Fukushima, or Three Mile Island, or that you don’t really need a lead vest at the dentist. Radiation is real!… I think… Oh and by the way, Strangelove is still the best movie ever made.
But the trouble they went to in order to keep the ‘explosive chain reaction’ lie alive!
The mind boggles at the sheer magnitude of this continuing Big Lie; the rest pale in comparison. I mean, Who knows the truth? There must be scientists out there who are ‘in on’ the continuance, who know that the fast neutrons would not hit enough nuclei in the micro-second of time necessary for an explosive chain reaction to occur. The physics is all still classified, so there is no smoking gun. Still, an open minded physicist could probably spill the beans on the ‘impossibility factor.’
But Christ, I’d love to have been a fly on the wall with Oppenheimer and the gang when the equations told them a nuke bomb was impossible! Then how the bad news went ‘up the chain’ to whomever… and the decision was made to fake the Trinity Test (see both links for how obvious this fakery was)… then the Japan bombings… then… the rest is ‘history.’ (Yes, of course the Soviets were in on it, as they were and are with the space Big Lies. Interesting implications…)
See ‘Miles Mathis’s essay wherein he proves this image and others were fakes.
But hey, the lie I started to talk about is the ‘Vice’ lie about the rising sea level at the Marshall Islands. Really, it’s sort of hilarious that this one is buried under the nuke one. I mean the PTB guys trying to keep all the lies straight must be pissed that the climate change liars didn’t get the ‘nuke lie’ memo to keep the ‘Tomb’ out of the spotlight! (This is a result of compartmentalization, of course.)
What if someone not in on the lie goes down there and finds out there is no radiation leaking from under the ‘tomb’ (yes, they could have used dirty bombs in their fake tests, but the radiation from a dirt bomb would not compare with what should be under the tomb… if you get my drift).
Yes, a tangled web indeed.
Addendum: If you’re going to leave a negative comment on this, make sure you read (at least) the ‘Miles Mathis’ (PTB limited hangout) essay, if not the Nagatani book. I suspect that some of you will be thinking about the hugely complex details a lie like the nuke bomb hoax would entail, and for so long. I know. I agree. But they have faked the imagery, there is zero doubt about that. You have to explain why they would do that.
But anyway, take your pick today folks! You wanna talk about the climate change lie or the nuke lie? They are both biggies!
Allan
Goddamn it, folks, I’m sorry I haven’t been up to doing a decent post in a while, but this boat problem is really distracting, mainly because of my aversion to being lied to. I thought I was tougher than this; maybe it’s old age really setting in. First my surfing goes, then my writing chops, now it’s this personal problem. But Christ, is it just me? Every time I turn around someone is fucking with me, usually for money. I’ll try to move along, put this out of my mind, but it’s tough.
A reminder: Anyone who can make it to the Virginia Beach area, you do me a favor (with my boat) and I’ll make it worth your while.
79 comments for “Two Frauds In One”