First, thanks to ‘Ray’ for posting the link I’ll provide below, a letter from Dr. Leonard Horowitz to the U.S. Government, giving his view on what I’m calling the ‘Chinese Scare’ (CS), since all we really, absolutely know about it is that it scares people (and well it should, no matter what it is).
Doctor Horowitz’s book on AIDS and Ebola, which I read years ago and have re-read since, is the go-to work on bio-warfare and who is behind it. I highly recommend this one, especially now, as one of the bio-weapon scenarios described in the book is almost certainly what’s going on with the CS.
Addendum: I just remembered Doc Horowitz’s excellent documentary film, In Lies We Trust; The CIA Hollywood, and Bioterrorism, and highly recommend it, not only for its take on bio-warfare, but also it’s general truth-telling. The film is from the 2000s, but hasn’t lost any of its pizzazz; it’s taking apart of the PTB propaganda epic The History of Bioterrorism is classic. Ditto his outing of medical school training for doctors as trauma based mind control (which explains how doctors could push vaccines in the face of overwhelming evidence of the damage they cause).
For anyone with an interest in the true history of the ‘AIDS Pandemic,’ this film is a must-see.
I’ve talked with William (Engdahl) about Horowitz and my growing suspicion that Western Intel is behind the CS (Horowitz believes this also, but for different, more technical reasons), and he is more cautious about Horowitz, adding that the complexity of the world socio/economic/military/ power system (the PTB) is such that a (relatively) simple ‘cui bono’ analysis — which is one part of my reasoning — could be misleading.
Please do this: Read the Horowitz document and see what you think. Do your own research and please do forward any information you come across that you think is relevant. This is the advantage of a forum like this; we start with a sort of ‘mob analysis’ that we can sift through, quickly eliminating the garbage, paring it down further (as each of us sees fit), and see what makes the most sense. We are not going to agree on everything but at least we can expose ourselves to all relevant points of view.
There are two main aspects to Horowitz’s thesis. First he analyzes the CS ‘virus’s DNA, and claims there are genetic ‘additions’ that could not appear via natural processes, most importantly an ‘AIDS-virus envelope gene,’ which is what he calls ‘the smoking gun’ pointing to the CS as a bio-weapon.
As I have said before, an accidental release of the virus is unlikely, given the extreme protocols in a Level 4 bio-lab. If the CS is a bio-weapon, it was unleashed with mal intent.
Assuming the above, what’s left is to find the culprit. Horowitz sees the West as the most likely source, and I tend to agree, based on the following:
Cui bono (Who benefits)? Obviously, on the surface, the Chinese are suffering most (so far), but as William Engdahl has pointed out, alliances at the very top of the PTB are so complex, with equally complex ‘goals’ among the several factions; surface repercussions can be misleading.
Okay, point taken, but in my view the Chinese’s handling of the media and their information leakage has been so muddled and transparently misleading that I tend to doubt they were directly involved in the engineering of the outbreak.
The net gain for the PTB is obvious, as many of you have commented: A world-wide catastrophe of this sort is the perfect rationalization for the launch of a totalitarian one world system, with the usual ‘It’s for your own good’ as the M.O.. Call this the Occam Solution. (The Climate Change strategy isn’t working fast enough.)
Here’s the Horowitz letter. Read it carefully and see what you think.
Allan
Logan and I are discussing his post, which deals with the possibility that ‘germ theory’ itself is a fraud, and that ‘viruses’ are produced by our own bodies as part of a reaction to disease. My problem with this paradigm is that it seems to negate any sort of communicable disorder. If there are no ‘germs’ then how is the common cold, say, spread? Give us a couple days.
Comments on this subject are welcome, but please keep them brief; our main current subject is the CS.
31 comments for “A Most Likely Scenario?”