My last post might’ve been an error in judgement, as it turns out. I spent the last few days in confusion, not knowing where to focus my attention, and your various comments were not a help. I’d read one, nodding and mmmming, make a note for the ‘Big Board’ (Strangelove), then get distracted by the next comment…
Addendum: Since last week I’ve read two books on the Manhattan Project, am listening to another via Audiobook, and have squinted at numerous YT talks and old films (plus H-wood’s Fat Man and Little Boy), and feel like I’m further from the truth than ever. Give me another couple days, however, and I’ll try to sum up my confusion.
The ‘Big Board.’ Your names and subjects were going to go here but I’m thinking it’s a bad idea.
But what does get my attention is when two or more subjects co-relate, and do so from completely different directions. In the following list of co-related subjects, the first isn’t on my list (except in subtext), but in one way or another is connected to all the rest. See if you agree…
‘The Moon Numbers’
Star visibility
Simulation theory
A.I.
Mandela Effect
Intelligent Design
Mind Control/Psyops (maybe, depending on…)
UFOs
and even What happens when we die… (which might connect, depending on how you look at the over all picture).
All photos are from the last few days…
The easiest way to explain what I mean is to go back and look at what I wrote previously about ‘The Moon Numbers’, given that some of you may have no idea what I’m talking about; others may only dimly recollect. In fact, I only dimly recollect…
#
Okay, I did a search of my older posts for stuff on The Moon Numbers by googling “Butler” site:http://blog.banditobooks.com (I’ve saved your time by making it a link to itself), ‘Butler” being one of the authors of Who Built the Moon? See, I knew any mention of The Moon Numbers would include his name, whereas searching for “Moon” or the like would bring up irrelevant posts. You get the drift here. (This is a handy search method and worth keeping in mind when you’re looking for something.)
One of the references was in my Open Letter to Professor Nick Bostrom; the section bears repeating here:
ANOTHER LINE OF EVIDENCE
My other piece of evidence (for Simulation Hypothesis, or SH) is in a book I read recently (right after experiencing totality in the recent solar eclipse); it’s called Who Built the Moon?, by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler. It’s possible that someone has referenced it to you since it proves beyond reasonable doubt that there is a ‘higher level of intelligence’ (of some sort) out there, either in or separate from our known universe.
An added coincidence is the number itself, 400. A ‘round’ integer in base 10 arithmetic. What are the odds? Not 
only that but the ‘canon’ of the number ‘400’ is on its own significant: 400 is the number of kilometers the moon turns on its axis each day… 400 is the number of times the earth turns faster than the moon…40,000 is the number of Megalithic Yards in one Megalithic second of arc of the sun… 40,000 is also the number of kilometers the earth turns on its axis each day… (I know: Units of measurement are, in theory, arbitrary, i.e., human conventions. Maybe not, though, since both the Megalithic Yard and the metric system are related to – and probably based upon — the circumference and the mass of the earth, which brings up interesting questions about our ancestors, all dealt with in the book (more on this below my signature). Another reason ‘400’ is significant: the meter was geodetically defined as one forty-millionth (1/40,000,000th) of the earth’s polar circumference.
But in case you are unfamiliar with the book, I’ll sum up its main argument: As you know, it’s a monumental coincidence that the moon is exactly the apparent size of the sun, making total eclipses like the one I saw possible – the moon being 400 times smaller in diameter yet 400 times closer to us than the sun.
You are likely aware of the utter necessity for higher life to exist on earth that the moon represents (no moon, no us!). And the unlikeliness the moon’s physical existence has been long argued by the scientific community. In fact, you may know that the moon’s existence is so unlikely that artificiality is not a new theory. What’s different now is that we have the robust, if not inarguable, evidence.Do you believe that all these ‘400’-related numbers are coincidences? If not, then by definition you believe in some kind of ‘higher intelligence/power’ — which is one necessary condition for SH to be true. This is not logically arguable. (As I will state again later, these (non)-‘coincidences’ are unrelated to the cosmological ‘fine tuning’ problem physicists argue over.)
So, again, the moon has to be where it is and its approximate present size for its function of making life possible. Now, taking an anthropomorphic view, and assuming that the earth-sun-moon arrangement was purposeful (the sun is also ‘numerically’ connected), can you not picture yourself wanting to ‘take credit’ for your ‘supernatural’ accomplishments? Plus might you not harbor curiosity as to the reactions of your creations (we conscious entities) to the certain knowledge of your existence? [end of excerpt]
I assume some of you (but not too many) had already read the above and recall it, but even if so, it was nested in a long-winded screed and may have blown right past you. My point being this: If the above info didn’t make you sit up and take notice, either you’re not really thinking, or I myself have my head up my ass.
See — and it’s worth repeating — ‘The Moon Numbers’ is extremely robust evidence for a ‘real’ ‘higher power,’ one that fits with the Simulation Hypothesis, or… does not. One way or the other, we have a ‘higher power’. Do you see what I mean?
No?
Okay, work with me here. Let’s look at a bit more from the above post:
For me – and given my research into biological evolution’s ‘impossible coincidences’ – what all this equals is that the nature of the ‘intelligent designer’ (for lack of a less baggage-laden term) may not be so far afield from that of humans after all. This has been the nature of my biggest epiphany since my investigation on HTWRW began in earnest about a decade ago, and which (in my gut) culminated during the recent eclipse totality – it was as if Someone was yelling, ‘Look, you jerk!’. (You have to experience totality to understand what I mean; partial eclipses don’t have the same effect.)
It is also possible that the blatant ‘clues’ to a higher power’s influence on life’s existence on earth amounts to an implied threat, or the inference that a ‘debt’ is owed. One need only look back at the canon of human mythology/religion for corroboration of this possibility.
Still more evidence: Here are just a few of the numbers involving the sun: 109.2 is the size ratio of the earth to the sun; 109.2 is also the number of earth diameters across the sun; and 10,920 is the size of the moon in kilometers. 27.322 are the sidereal days for one lunar orbit; 27.322 is also the percentage size, earth to moon. As you can see, there is no physics-related reason whatsoever that these numbers should match (they do not match ‘by necessity’). Anyone who would believe this is all coincidence is not a ‘philosopher’ in any true, ‘follow the evidence,’ sense of the word. If it’s not coincidence, then ‘intelligence’ is at work. But more than intelligence, there is ‘interest,’ in us, our ‘progress,’ and our behavior. ‘Curiosity’ would certainly fit with the Simulation Hypothesis, since we should assume that the Simulators share at least some intellectual properties with us. Another way to put it: Without curiosity about us, why run a simulation?
One more example. Is the number 366 important, cosmologically? Sure it is. It’s the number of earth rotations in one solar year. But so what? Well, in relative size the earth is also 366 per cent larger than the moon. This, too, is an ‘unnecessary’ match. Also, take the number 100, divide it by 366 and you get… 27.322. Look familiar? It’s the number of sidereal days (rotation of the earth re the fixed stars) for one lunar orbit (see above)! Holy shit! As a capper: for every 10,000 days on earth, the moon makes 366 orbits around us! Does ‘coincidence’ cause these ‘landings’ on round base 10 numbers?
There is nothing ‘cosmic’ about base 10. But the perfection only works in it! How did ‘they’ know we’d use it? How did they know we’d use the metric system and Megalithic Yards? These questions might be all be answered by SH. Why ‘they’ want us to know that they exist is a question of a different sort… [end excerpt]
Do you see what I mean by the last sentence? Why would all those numbers ‘match’ — proving to any reasoning entity that the solar system was ‘intelligently designed’ — if the ‘designer’ did not want us to know about him/her/it?
The other big news, I mean aside from the very existence of a designer (big or small ‘D’), is that he/she/it is, in important ways, like us. I know: ‘Made in our image’ as the Bible says — and the Bible does say ‘our’, i.e., plural:
Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”Genesis 1:26
Addendum: The Bible’s phaseology sure is interesting. I mean, how come no one ever brings up the use of ‘our’? Are we supposed to believe that God uses the ‘royal’ ‘we/our’? Methinks there is some denial at work here on the part of Bible-believers.
Later, ‘God’ commands us not to ‘put any other gods before me’ and he says this several times, doesn’t He? Doesn’t 
this mean that if you believe in (the Judaic) God, you must believe in the existence of other gods? (If there were no other gods, why would He be ‘A jealous God?’) How come no one brings this up? But I’m rambling off subject…
I’m tempted to say, Full Stop, or the like, here. I mean, I suspect the above excerpt — in the context of a too-long rambling insult to Nick Bostrom — may not have really hit home.
If it ain’t Chance… And if it ain’t Necessity… It’s Intelligence!
In fact, I am going to stop here, and let you guys chime in. But my question (for you to chime in on) is simply this: Don’t the ‘numbers of science’ prove (to any reasonable person) the existence of a real higher power? One that has monkeyed with our existence? And as I’ve said before: Why isn’t this big news elsewhere?
I’m all ears.
Allan
Addendum: While I was at it with The Moon Numbers, I recalled one of you tipping me to ‘Miles Mathis’ use of the Brit term ‘ring up’ (rather than ‘call’) so I did a search of milesmathis.com for ‘ring’; there were lots of ‘ring’ links but none in the context of ‘ring up.’ Not sure if the algorithm somehow missed it, or if it was just a mistaken notion to begin with.
For the helluvit, though, I then searched MM.com for ‘shite,’ one of the Brit terms I’d busted ‘him’ on. That didn’t come up either. Ahhh-ha! I was thinking. MM did a word/replace number on his site (replacing ‘shite’ with ‘shit’) as a result of my busting him on being a Brit. This would amount to double proof that ‘MM’ is a psyop — if his use of ‘shite’ was ‘innocent’ as he claims, why go to the trouble of dumping what I term one of his ‘Britisms’?
This set me off on a search for various terms at MM.com, including ‘shit’ and my own last name, to see if it’s still there in his several ‘retorts’ to my essays outing him. ‘Weisbecker’ only came up once. Given that I know he ragged on me at least three times, I’m wondering what’s up, either with MM or the google algorithm. So I did a search for ‘hospital’: If you recall, one of the ‘tells’ I found was his use of the word without a ‘the’ in front. (Brits say so-and-so ‘was in hospital’ rather than the Americanized ‘was in the hospital.’)
Oddly, the in hospital’ tells I pointed out did not come up, but I did find a new one:
[PDF]
What is the Fundamental Physics Prize? – Miles Mathis
Interesting. If he’d done a search/replace for that one, this ‘new’ one wouldn’t have come up. So I think we have to assume that the google algorithm is not reliable. It’s still useful, but not as much so as I thought. Just FYI.
The Moon numbers suggest that some form of ‘intelligent’ design was involved in the creation of the Sun-Moon-Earth system. Theories for the Moon’s origin do not seem to add up. Dr. Sagan famously commented that (I am paraphrasing here) a natural satellite cannot be hallow and would, by definition, have to be artificial. I was impressed with the book ‘Who built the Moon’ it presented some good evidence that the Moon was constructed by someone or something. My guess is that it is an interstellar space ship that went in search of the right kind of planet and solar system to seed with human DNA. With respect to the Moon landings it would seem that they were faked and that most NASA connected scientists have to maintain the story about the blackness of space which we know is a physical impossibility but since Armstrong said it the myth needs to be perpetuated. Also I do not think that it logically follows that the creator of the Universe must also be the creator of life an Earth. Given the age of the Universe next to the age of the Earth I think it is possible that a super advanced race of beings created life on Earth as an experiment or that we are part of a simulation.
You could very well be correct on all points.
The moon is hollow, and the well cratered exterior is the protection shield against meteors & things, and harsh temperature extremes.
The Hubble Telescope (for one thing), blows the “black space” lie wide open. Why no one gives this a mention is unbelievable.
As George Gurdjieff pointed out Mankind is asleep.
Question for Allan:
Is it possible for humans to pass through the Van Allen radiation belts? Was it possible for the Apollo astronauts to pass through the belts with the spaceship design of the time?. Why after the Apollo missions did we not go back and establish a base? Why did we only continue to orbit the Earth in shuttle crafts? Why did the Russians never go to the Moon?
This should answer all three or four: We never went to the moon (not in Apollo). You must be new here… try this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3di6odvdNZk
Thanks Allan, I will read it with great interest.
EVERYTHING Is Invisible In Space In The Visible Spectrum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSuVJm4TI5c
Good one! :-D, pull the other one it’s made of rubber.
They have ALL forgotten about the Hubble Telescope too BTW.
Late chiming in Allan but wanted you to know that you are absolutely not alone in recognizing there is something grander at play. And like you my research and perspective seems to lean towards intelligence, although i try to remember that it it could be simply a larger “force” if you will that from my scope and vantage point appears intelligent.
My awareness came through researching quantum understandings, and looking at cymatics and sacred geometry. Which is why i like to include the notion that perhaps its a grander force (as opposed to intelligent), and its my scope of perspective that makes it seem intelligent. Like if a big bell was rung, and the various metals are vibrating creating all kinds of forms such as plants, animals and humans to emerge, and they are in resonance with one another so it FEELS intelligent, whether i am able to know that or not from where i sit. But when i talk with others about this, the word intelligence is often what flows out of my mouth.
When one looks closer at things, and digs into the numbers, or the geometries, one starts to understand there is something “beyond” the self that is embedding lots of intelligence and synchronicities into this thing we call existence. I’m hesitant to relate any human qualities or even name “it” but awareness of this grander “thing” feels important. Its like the awareness that while my physical container has changed all my life ever since being birthed onto this earth plane, whatever that is which looks from behind my eyes has remained the same. I’m hesitant to name that too, but being aware of it feels important. I’m not sure a human mind will ever be able to really understand it, being so much larger in scope than any one of us.
But it seems we can synchronize with this grander intelligence/force, as it is happening through us just like everything else. One last thought would be that it often seems we are in a process of remembering, as opposed to learning. Perhaps our species knew all this before, or perhaps its all coded into our systems and we’re finally tapping into the right code. No matter the what, the idea of remembering feels more correct than learning.
And at the end of the day, it seems important to remember that most of these things we take so seriously are often just silly human games. If one tries to control life, one will quickly understand its beyond being able to control. We “think” we know but we truly know so little. So, your blog is enjoyable for me because you both ask the questions and do the digging into HTWRW, as well as share about direct experience such as looking at the stars with your own eyes and riding a nice wave on the ocean. We can get lost in the mental picture of existence, but nothing replaces direct experience of being alive. Thanks for what you do and creating space for this type of sharing.
Great one. (I’ve split it into paragraphs to make it more tempting to dive into.)
Give it a read, folks!
It was interesting… quite a point of view.
I have lost interest in whether a creator being exists or not. The numbers are fascinating. Is there a possibility of a physics or maths explanation?
That’s because your not currently paying enough attention. But lucky for you, in a future incarnation, you’ll become extremely interested in the notion of a creator …..
I agree completely with the evidence pointing to design – I really appreciated your insight on the numbers re the sun/moon/earth in the open letter to Bostrum, and again here. I’ve been here since the blog was an email – I came for the surf stories after reading Zero, and when you started with questions about HTWRW I figured I’d peace out. But you asked questions that I couldn’t answer, and for the first time that bothered me. I stayed. Been wrestling with what I think I know, and discarding waste and lies as they come to light. I don’t respond much, but wanted to let you know I’m still out here – thank you.
Thanks a bunch for sticking with it. Not many have. I’m considered the nutcase of the surfing world. Pezman and his henchman at The Surfer’s Journal both (separately) said they couldn’t watch Water Time after 13 minutes in, said they got bored. (I’d done at least a dozen articles for them.) Curious that they both said that separately, I looked. It was when I first showed Building 7 of the WTC.
Journalists?
Their huge loss missing out on Water Time,- it’s excellent, and just look at the great feedback, reviews & “Thumbs UP”.
Let me tell you, people who call the term “nutcase” , are rude, blind – no one blinder than those who don’t want to see, unintelligent, and *SPINELESS*.
Building 7 actually scares them, and they stupidly attack the messenger.
Allan, I was the one who remarked about Miles’ use of the “ring up” terminology. If you read his biography on his website, it is littered with Britisms (“daemon” instead of demon; “carpark” instead of parking lot), yet the spelling is definitely American English (e.g., color is spelled color as opposed to colour). But the key to unlocking this is when you go to the following link: http://mileswmathis.com/latin.html
Here, Miles starts with this line: “My biographer asked me to tell this story myself, since it is too silly to cast into the third person. She says it is silly but she wants me to tell it anyway.” (Okay…so Miles has a biographer who is someone other than him, presumably female who likes to spell like an American, but use British phrases.) However, if you continue to read the Bad Boy of the Latin Club entry, Miles HIMSELF (and not his biographer) writes this:
“The next year I was a second-year student and vastly more mature. This time I only got arrested for pulling a fire alarm in the dorms at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. In my defense the telephones in the dorms had very weird rings, and no one rang us up, so I didn’t know it was the phones. I thought everyone else was pulling the fire alarms, so I thought I would join the fun.”
I refuse to believe some kid from west Texas wrote that paragraph. What is a second-year student? In the U.S., we call them sophomores.
I have noticed poor photo’s of the moon these days, all those structures and towers are gone.
Even the Hubble telescope turns a blind eye to it…nothing much to see at all.
“Do you believe that all these ‘400’-related numbers are coincidences? If not, then by definition you believe in some kind of ‘higher intelligence/power’”
Allan, I think these numbers are more likely some harmonies. For example ‘Orbital resonance’, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_resonance
Higher intelligence/power is not an answer, because you have to say where such intelligence came from. Otherwise it is circular definition/explanation.
Orbital resonance works with two body systems, which is not the case with our solar system.
I don’t know what you mean when you say ‘higher intelligence is not the answer.’ I’m not looking for an ‘answer’ but just observing the way things are: If something is not caused by ‘chance’ or ‘necessity’ then there is an intelligence at work. This is a simplification but I don’t have it in me to write an essay at the moment.
No, orbital resonance works between all bodies naturally. No two bodies are isolated from the others, all works together. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_resonance
I am not saying that orbital resonance is the only explanation for all the numbers you mentioned in the article. It is much more going on than meets the eye. Can you really tell what is/isn’t caused by ‘chance’ or ‘necessity’!?
There is an intelligence at work in everything, or at least I see it in everything. But to me ‘higher intelligence‘ is not the definitive answer, it is not an true explanation for things we do not (fully) understand. We are touching and inevitably aiming at the most fundamental questions here.
“… or at least I see it in everything.”
Mystery solved.
Allan, I reread this and am thinking I will post it on TBP in a slightly edited (only format and a tiny bit of streamlining. I will send you the submission before I hit “post” to Admin there.
There are some real science nerds there who chime in once in a while when really interesting ideas regarding Intelligent Design crop up. I’m hoping they will give the essay a read and chime in. I know a couple of them “know” of you, but don’t know if they follow you here.
I think some of them should. Some of them should probably NOT.
Sorry it took so long to come across this one. (The WordPress format for comments sucks, as some of you have pointed out.)
Yes, I agree completely; MM claims someone else wrote it but that’s because it;s so over the top in creating ‘a character,’ he didn’t want to sound like such an ego maniac. And the ‘ring up’ is a great tell; I missed it and many others, no doubt.
Thanks a bunch, Maggie, for sticking me on TBP again. I do appreciate it. Folks here might give the site a look:
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2019/11/27/back-to-the-moon/#comment-1853350
That’s my posting but look around at the others.
Allan, I don’t comment much, but I read every one of your posts (and most of the comments)
I read “Who Built the Moon” in 2017 and was completely floored.
These irrefutable number relationships are a HUGE deal…
Although it concerns me a little that most of the comments are so…’off target’, I have to admit that it’s a lot to wrap ones head around.
I encourage other intelligent readers who are actually following along and vitally interested in this ongoing search for HTWRW to chime in so Allan doesn’t think he’s talking only to trolls and high school dropouts!
Thanks, db. I was hoping that my comment would flush out one or two who are listening but don’t comment much (or at all). Absent at least a few people who ‘get it’ I wouldn’t write this blog at all. (I like your art, btw.)
I agree db the numbers are inarguable as to what Allan has highlighted. I’ll add,
and I’ll say the same thing here as i mentioned to Allan a year or so ago, this higher power can f*ck off. Too much crapola going on against us, this human race. As far as other commenters, there are a lot of tall tales being woven around here too, many completely irrelevant.
Yeah, I don’t see how many of the comments are related to the post. But I repeat myself…
It’s a mystery to me, how the earth has been let go, to be nothing more than a prison planet. It’s like good things were planned by “The Gods”, but they have been murdered or something.
This great Subterfuge
Is explained in The Angelic Conflict
By R.B. Thieme, JR – free from http://www.rbthieme.org
Angels of God were before humans (we).
The unseen (not matter) by humans conflict is over humans and their
Soul/Spirit from our volition. Although, some do see
aliens, ufo’s, ghosts, etc. also, when out of their body looking back at themselves.
We’re in lucifers domain and are constantly tested.
That’s the theology reasoning, hence, The Angelic Conflict.
The conflict is obviously on earth as well. Searching for truth
also becomes picking the right side to be on when/after moving on.
I was hoping there would be more comments that relate to what the post says. My realization that there is empirical evidence for the existence of a ‘higher power’ had a great effect on my view of things.
Do you guys not get this or am I unclear or what’s the problem? (I say this based on the few comments that have appeared and is a general observation, not a jab at any one person. Maybe there are a lot of you (or one or two) that get this but decided not to comment? I hope so.)
I am hoping for ‘higher benevolent’. If an immortal ‘higher power’ exists I hope for a counter power in case the former gets high on it’s power and starts flinging lightning bolts, rain and volcano eruptions all over the place. Moving moons and planets around is ok but moving planets around like he/she/it is playing pool. That would be abusive and remind me of burying ants with sand as a kid just to see how much sand it took.
I think ‘our image’ would be for Elohim which itself maybe for Shining Ones. We have men who look like Elohim messing with old writings and trying to get everyone on the same page and the same book. At the time there were other folks adhering to other gods and these ‘bad guys’ needed to come into ‘the fold’ and heed the advice of the ‘one true God’ that these guys whom look like Elohim were putting together from old writings from all over the place.
While transcribing old texts some of these guys may have sneaked in some stuff more to their liking or the liking of the ones whom had power over them. Some did so in a manner that sentences became very difficult to understand to latter day readers. This caused dissent and fragmentation of groups under one umbrella to be under other umbrellas of thought.Not to mention those whom disdained group thought that just wanted to figure things out for themselves (freaks).
There was no progress. Whether church beholden or not, weapons of mass destruction were thought about and the power one would have! To not just look like Elohim but to be Elohim itself! To go to heaven in space(X)! To get others to grovel at your feet and lick toe jam! To get others to obey whatever you wanted them to obey! Where every move the Elohim( in look only) has the fully enabled Elohim watching you!
And thus GGL (Google) spoke!
Our, we is used because WE are GOD.
God is everything that is consciousness. We are not these bodies.
The confusion, non-stop for many Americans especially, is because we actually “Think” you (I) are this body. The brain is where you focus as yourself, I etc. Head forward is a bad thing. Go to a chiropractor and they will show you how it should be.
Heart Forward.
The reality is that it is nonsense. Yet with no training as a child we end up constantly searching and confused simply because of the insane idea that we are these physical bodies.
You will find unending data on what I am saying. We are spiritual beings. We are not these bodies. When you are able to quiet the mind and find your true self then you see that we are Love. Yet that last sentence wipes most people out with unending aggravation of how silly or wrong the concept is.
This is your Ego’s job. It works day and night to keep you in it’s hooks. Most of us dig in deeper and laugh at the silliness of the above reality.
We are one. Love is truly where it will take you.
Our vibration is key to our existence it seems as once you get yourself into a matching frequency with Love everything is wonderful. I cannot explain this since I honestly am still working on it but I believe that we are spiritual beings and I believe we are all part of a greater good. Why or how it is managed or if it is managed I do not know and as you have stated numerous times the relationship of so many things to each other cannot possibly be accidental.
Hence if we are all God it sure helps explain the story.
It’s not like I made this up of course. There are so many stories in the old testament, in every ancient artifact that point to similar concepts.
The answers are there if you want them but since the driver is not your true self but some physical energy stimulated by the physical brain and Ego it becomes extremely difficult to sort the wheat from the chaff.
Hahaha. So sorry. That last sentence I did not realize is heavily used in the stories of our past Egos. I checked my spelling of chafe and saw it is chaff. I also saw the Bible reference.
For me it is beautiful to believe we are Love. To touch a flower or smell a root or smell a flower and touch a root it is all a signal from your mind. So few stop and smell the flowers any longer. The rush to get to the store or wherever everyone is rushing off to is truly why we are so lost.
If everything is waves and particles then what are we? Waves and particles?
We are surely not as we see. Allan, as the bringer of the content, are you sure you are that brain? Are you convinced that Love is not more powerful than your words? Do you not love nature? It surely seems you are a beautiful spirit and one with a lot of power. Do not allow hate to enter. Love is surely the answer to all our questions. You do a wonderful job as I see it. I have myself to get on track so I cannot or will not dare to act like I know better.
To find a way to maintain the physical being without also knowing the spiritual seems pointless to what I have left. We do not know each other’s “Stories” yet it is so common that humans identify with them.
What I did with the body I am in has no meaning in the true realm of Love. I will not talk about my adventures as they were of unknown reality. How can I prove anything that occurred in 1978? Why do I want to talk about such “adventures”. Ego seems to be the answer oftentimes.
I am clueless unquestionably. Yet I remain at one with my true self I hope so that I no longer experience the bondage of the Ego mind.
Love is truly the answer for us all I believe. How we use it together I am unsure but will remain believing I am not this body. I look in a dog’s eyes and Love is surely strong there. My cats are also beautiful creatures and the Love connects to me constantly. Notice they do not seem to have the Ego as we do. Yet what on Earth do I really know about anything…..
(More or less maybe)
Nodding in agreement here for sure!..
The brain is only an ANTENNA (receiver).
Nice commentary but I’m not sure I see how it relates to the post. When did I ever say or imply that I am my brain? Since I don’t believe that I don’t think I have. Love as being the answer does sound nice but doesn’t it depend on the question?
Doug,
New age stuff is partially made up also. I tend to see duality, oneness ignores it, e.g. we are all one… yeah ok, your girl friend is my girl friend (send her over)…but in my investigations into the base bible- the Masoretic Text uses; Elohim, which was changed from plural to mono-YHWH. I got a sister in the Oneness thing in India- it works and doesn’t work. Outside of it you find you cannot relate unless you can convince another into the fold. Same-o Same-o, I would rather study a squirrel for true living. They run around, gather only enough nuts for themselves and seem to have fun. That is all that counts.
Did you know, no ones girlfriend belongs to, OR, is the property of anyone? (and vice versa).
AND they should be allowed to if they want to.
In the area of human relationships & sexuality, the PTTTB have severely destroyed and brainwashed the people so bad, their grey matter has turned to MUSH in this area.
JEALOUSY is the worst emotion on earth.
You forgot about the “Black Sun”, there, Herr Weisbecker. That makes three celestial objects of the same size and general path through the firmaments. It could just be that they are each a sun until the bulb goes bad (solar minimum) and they have to start up a new one. Moon = light bulb on startup, Sun = lightbulb on full, Black Sun = light bulb undergoing renovation/replacement.
I’e seen a video on how eclipses work on a flat earth some time ago that was pretty interesting, don’t remember the details but it probably on U-tube and probably from Dubey so it’s likely gone. Curious that sometimes during an eclipse you can see both the sun and the moon from our earthly plane. Hard to explain if it is three balls lined up in space. It could just there is a third part of the celestial machine that we see little evidence of, except during a lunar eclipse.
Isn’t the “Black Sun” that black wheel symbol thing OR a black hole?… yes it is.
“THEY” (Ratbags on 2 legs money men), dream about controlling the sun and moon light, because they want to tax you for it.
Rex, please explain what this sentence means: ‘That makes three celestial objects of the same size and general path through the firmaments.’
Doesn’t mean anything, which makes the rest of the comment unclear at best, and non-sensical at worst.
How eclipses work on a flat earth? Since the earth is not flat, what does that have to do with anything? (I assume you mean ‘Dubay’ and he is a state mole, no question, part of the FE psy op.)
I’ve seen the sun and moon at the same time during an eclipse and it doesn’t mean anything. Has to do with the bending of light rays by the atmosphere, and both the sun and moon are juuuust barely above their respective horizons. It only happens briefly, just before sunset (or sunrise, I assume but I saw it during sunset). Then the sun sets and the moon rises further.
You ought to look into things before you make a comment like that on this forum.
The sun/moon during an eclipse is explained if you search for… guess what? This: ‘How can we see the sun and moon at the same time during an eclipse?’
Which will take you here: https://www.google.com/search?q=How+can+we+see+the+sun+and+moon+at+the+same+time+during+an+eclipse&oq=How+can+we+see+the+sun+and+moon+at+the+same+time+during+an+eclipse&aqs=chrome..69i57.16054j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
I hope you’ve learned something here.
That would be the sun, the moon, and the black sun. The idea of a black sun has been around for a long time. Mostly I was just pranging you on the flat earth and the nazi angle from the last post. Flat earth still looks more likely to me, maybe it’s a 2D world after all.
Have you taken a look at the infrared videos out the plane window? I think the guy is J. Tolan or Tolen on uTube. You can see things 500 or 1000 or more miles away, they should be far below the horizon, unless the round earth is far larger than 25000 mile circumference.
I thought Dubay’s FE videos were about the only ones worth watching. Looks like most of the rest are shills to me. I’ve been looking at things all my life, which is why I look at forums like this, thanks for taking some of that pleasure away. I can’t help but notice your new post is a response to my comment on big boy, little boy bombs the other day. Some days you are kind of a jerk Allan.
What if the moon is not as physical as we are told? I got a thought about this, I never saw anywhere else. The sun with its sunsspots looks similar to the moon with its craters. The craters could be equivalent to the sunspots, but changing in much longer cycles. The sun cycles have been observed by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe in Dessau, the town I grew up. The cycles are given with 11 and 22 years, interesting numbers again. In the occult, the moon is seen as the female principle, reflecting the male sun. An eclipse could be both poles overlying, and nullifying. Disclaimer – I don’t think the earth is flat in the simplistic way, as it is done to ridicule any approach to find out where we are.
PS – No need to to conclude from gods jealousy:
Psalms 95:3 (KJV) For the LORD is a great God, and a great King above all gods.
In response to your PS – why is LORD always written in all caps? Legally does that not mean the LORD is dead? Or maybe LORD is a position, a station, rather than a reference to one particular being?
LORD is a flattering title, it means it is an office, not a god.
Oh my, I hope he is not French. They use uppercase for all their sir names.
legally meaning in latin
It is that way in the original KJV too. The names of God are a deep rabbit hole.
His name is YHWH. For some reason [ superstition? ] they didn’t like to say it so LORD became substitute.
Y= life
H= giver female
W= law
H= giver male
Sorry, but another questionable comment, in that it doesn’t seem to relate to the post, and relating the sunspots and the moon’s craters makes no sense, at least to me. Yes, there is an 11 year cycle but I wonder if that has anything to do with anything also.
And what does ‘An eclipse could be both poles overlying, and nullifying’ mean?
The earth is not flat in a simplistic way? Okay, but is it flat in a complex way?
Your PS does not seem to mean anything either, except to verify that according to the Old Testament God, there are other gods he completes with, and how does that…
… point being that your last few lines are likewise unclear at best…
By “simplistic” FE I meant the Dubay way, building a model with our physical understanding of the world. The heavens are a different place, science too acknowledges that, they need the dark matter to make their model work. I presented some concepts, to get a wider perspective here, with may be necessary to explain findings like the moon numbers. The PS was just a blatant verse, most people I know got no idea the Bible talks about multiple gods.
The old testament is littered with off world references and ‘in our image’ is a good one. And what sort of god(s) require blood sacrifice? Maybe mark of the nephilim as a patch of scaly skin is a clue?
Late here, more tomorrow.
It may be that I’ve missed it , yet in your pieces on star visability I have not seen you mention the atmosphere. What if the sun emits kinetic, not thermal, energy and an atmosphere is required to convert this energy to heat and light? No stars then seen from space. Just a thought…
I’ve been pondering recently how in pictures the ‘moon’ appears as a black hole during a solar eclipse. I have never witnessed one and thus lacking in first hand experience though even with the sun’s corona should there not be at least some earthshine? As our planet is mostly water and a huge % would be reflecting the sun’s light we should see something, no?
With a clear sky – no clouds or smoke in the way, the stars get MUCH brighter the higher you go.
A photographers description, 6 klms up Mt Everest > “Nowhere else on the planet have I ever seen the Milky Way so clear, so vivid and so very much alive. It takes a great deal of discipline to stay up all night capturing the magic for the world to experience. Cameras freeze. Shutters freeze. Batteries freeze. Humans freeze. The high altitude environment is debilitating at best. Your body is taking a constant beating by the low levels of oxygen in the atmosphere. The higher you climb of course, the worse this becomes.”
A fantastic time lapse film from up Mt Everest > https://youtu.be/X1s3ngqYKTk
The secret is to be well away from light pollution as well of course. Anyone who hasn’t seen the Milky Way, has always been too close to city lights.
Well, Andrew, still another one that indicates a lack of looking in to subjects before commenting on them. You write:
‘What if the sun emits kinetic, not thermal, energy and an atmosphere is required to convert this energy to heat and light? No stars then seen from space.’
It would take an essay to respond to this, but ‘kinetic energy’ means matter in motion and, simplistically, the sun’s rays are not ‘matter.’ That’s just for a start.
See Brett’s Mt Everest link for a hint about star visibility. (Great one!) As you can see, the higher you go the clearer the stars get (which is why they put telescopes on mountains).
So how could they get brighter as you gain elevation, then suddenly blink out? This is the real question and I’ve wondered about it many times on this blog. I still have no answer, and your comment hasn’t helped.
Sorry if I’m getting cranky but in my view I’ve given important information about the existence of a higher power and so far no one has even indicated that they ‘get it’ at all.
I thought you (and others) would love that incredible Everest film Allan. And notice how bright the stars are against the moon and white snow.
If course we know the stars don’t suddenly “blink out” a bit further up, or even a long way up.
Hey is the Hubble Telescope looking through any atmosphere? 🙂
You would have known in your heart of a Higher Power long ago Allan?, I couldn’t imagine it has dawned on you more recently. I knew something (suddenly clicked) when I was studying nature under the microscope at least, at about 30y.o.
I am enjoying watching your Water Time movie (again!) – it’s simply Awesome Thank You.
Re my kinetic comment, that’s fair.
For me, the presence of a ‘higher power’ is felt from within and evidence via numbers while interesting is not surprising.
That being said I feel it’s wise to discern the difference between what may be perceived as a higher power from source of animation, of life force itself. Misplacing that power is what got us into this mess to begin with.
Is the moon real or some sort of artificial satalite? (Note i have not read the book yet i can guess the identify of who built it is unanswered.) Is it a natural body with the numbers you quote being a grand example of the mathematical fractal in which we live? Or were the mathematics known and used to plant a device in our skies that would become the religion behind the occult in their worship of magic and ritual sacrifice and of the dark mother kali ma ?.. Are the questions your post left me pondering.
I hope this helps.
http://www.otherbiblecode.com
I highly recommend Brett’s link. See how bright the stars are from 25,000 or so feet? See the problem with ‘no stars’ from space?
Asimov wrote ‘Foundation’ short stories in the early ’50s. the US conquest of the Pacific seems to have been his inspiration for a Milky Way-spanning empire; he was said to have worked in the Brooklyn shipyards. A decade later, Trek was also heavily USN-based. And of course Star Wars uses the Foundation as well as the US civil war.
but anyway Asimov returned to the series in the 80s, writing two novel-length sequels and two prequels. The showdown scenes in the sequels go into the absurdity (artificiality) of the Moon, its numbers, etc.
Less relevantly (or not) Asimov’s son was busted for heaps of child porn but got off scot free as you do.
David Niven’s memoir was titled ‘The Moon’s a Balloon.’
The moon numbers are intriguing and I agree it is just screaming out at us. I wonder are there other numerical connections. Whilst I don’t know much about music, I thought maybe there are connections there but a quick check shows it has got lots of links to Fibonacci numbers but just thought that musical is such a human thing. Although I suppose birds sing and whales too…
One thing I would note is there is a certain beauty to the numbers as there is too much of life. This seems to be a unmentioned but constant background theme. And maybe that is why I wondered by if there are any connections to music given most people -at least in the case of decent music -is generally considered beautiful.
Regarding the “designer”. Surely the whole point is that we wake up and collectively as a society acknowledge it. Whereas the ancients may have done that to some degree in times past in that they were probably aware of the numbers and built structures based on them, And surely the acting of waking up is then to engage with the world you wake up to. Are the designers not waiting for that? Is that not the whole point of their project? So the question is why are the efforts so great to prevent that by the PTB? And one would imagine it is not really a good idea to be shaken awake. Ideally it should come more naturally, willingly even. But no collectively we’re largely asleep.
So is knowledge and understanding of physics related to this and part of the means by which to connect to that world one is waking up to. That is the world of the designer. Then if someone or group is trying to prevent this, then maybe that explains the physics frauds -to stop us??
On another note, if all this life thing as it were is set of an interesting experiment where a certain positive outcome would be desirable, do or have the designers allowed for the possibility of failure? Indeed why would you even allow failure?
And one last thought. I notice with protest movements and various forms of change that people will quite quickly move and join something where before they were apathetic when they are given real hope and a sense of taking action (now) can make a difference. It is sort of infectious. Well most actions and propaganda against us are about killing hope and making us apathetic. But in this age of mass communication, it is really vital that they kill it, because in some ways if something really dramatic happened it could spread really fast and out of control (of the PTB). So that must be scary so in a sense the insurance against it is to really dumb that people so badly they are reduced to a zombie like state in capable of reacting to anything.
There is some good stuff here but I wish you would be more aware of syntax and grammar and what words actually mean. It was difficult getting the meaning out of your comment. Did you read it carefully before hitting Send?
I was kind of hoping to restructure it and see if he would elaborate.
Terence, if I may…
You said “The moon numbers are intriguing and I agree it is just screaming out at us. I wonder are there other numerical connections.” Why do you think they are intriguing? I did as well.
But, my son was born November 22, 1993, which is JFK day and so was my cousin’s son, 20 years later. Sometimes coincidences might be puns. Maybe the moon numbers are puns.
Then you said “Whilst I don’t know much about music, I thought maybe there are connections there but a quick check shows it has got lots of links to Fibonacci numbers but just thought that musical is such a human thing. Although I suppose birds sing and whales too…”
I really get it that your stream of consciousness sailed off onto an interesting path, but it left the reader behind admiring the sunset of your brilliance. I happen to know a bit about music; enough to know that mathematical coincidences are like key changes in a fine piece of music. If you are not in the band, you might not even notice.
Now, without being too snitty, which I do NOT intend because I do think your thoughts are interesting, but should be fleshed out perhaps…
Now, bowing out…
See, this is what I mean, Terence. You start with:
The moon numbers are intriguing and I agree it is just screaming out at us. I wonder are there other numerical connections.
Then, instead of relating to a higher power (which is what the numbers MEAN), you wander off into music, then other stuff that doesn’t bear on the subject. What’s up?
Actually I was trying to be brief so as not to make the comment too long. I was wondering about the link to music to see if the numbers relate to other areas because if they did it would surely give more insight and I also hinted at beauty of things. And the other points I raised do relate because the message itself has implications. You are more focused on the source of the originator of the numbers which is fine but figuring out the message has to be part of that process.
I would have thought it was the beauty and symmetry of the numbers that to some level tells you a little about the higher power / designer. Since 400=16×25 which are squares of 4 and 5 and 4 is square of 2 etc. So it is also 2^3 x 5^2 and 2,3,5 are all prime numbers. Does it imply the designer is mathematical in some way? Also things that have beauty often have interesting mathematical properties and contain all sorts of symmetries. Hence the link I was trying to determine.
I presume you are trying to figure out whether people think the designer is material in the sense of just an extremely advanced civilisation or something more spiritual. So what do the numbers mean. Well the chance of getting everything to line up by chance and produces all these numbers is so remote that anyone with an open mind and basic intelligence and an eye for beauty should recognise it is a clear message and the language of that message is mathematics which appears to be universal.
I can’t see in my limited view what more can be gleaned from the numbers about the designer. The other points I was making were related to the significance of the message itself. I find it unlikely that if the designer goes to all that trouble and subtlety that they are just going to show all their cards about themselves so easily. You have to earn your right to get to that stage. Hence my other points about direction of society etc. This is not about individuals. The planetary pieces weren’t arranged just for some small set of people. That intent alone must be telling us something about the designer along with the numbers too.
Taking it a bit further, if it is just a single God then the various religions have said a lot on that and how you are supposed to live your life and wind up with God. If it is instead another civilisation the implications as I see it, apply as I stated earlier more broadly to everyone. -i.e. God saves individuals. Civilisations save civilisations. Does this designer spend their time going around the galaxy setting up life on every other candidate star system? And it leads straight back to how did they arise? Presumably the members of the designer civilisation are immortal or at least live a very long time. Again the whole concept of deadly accidents is something that needs to be reconciled with that possibility and which I mentioned in other comments I made. If they are immortal then effectively they are gods. Mind you if they have been around for tens if not hundreds of millions of years they must be darn close to being so.
Thanks. I, for one, appreciate the lengthy comment from time to time.
There are many other numerical [ I call them ] hints:
“Few people today realize that what is generally known as ‘The Bible’ represents, potentially, about 50% of the information contained between its covers. Let me explain: the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek documents from which all Bible translations ultimately derive may also be fairly read as sets of numbers. This intriguing situation comes about because, long ago, these ancient peoples adopted the practice of using the letters of their alphabets as numerals. Accordingly, each letter was associated with a fixed value, and a sequence of letters with the sum of their respective values. Consequently, equipped with the relevant scheme of numeration, every Hebrew or Aramaic word of the Old Testament and every Greek word of the New Testament may be readily translated into a whole number [0]. But it is appropriate that we ask whether numbers obtained in this way can, in any sense, be regarded as meaningful. I suggest that, under normal circumstances, we would tend to conclude that these derivatives are meaningless adhesions to the text. But here is a Book that claims to be divinely-inspired! Might not things be different in this case? Might not the numbers represent information that complements the biblical text? Might not this particular text be self-authenticating? How could we know for sure? Clearly, a simple test is required to settle the matter.”
from the link above ^
“The seemingly interminable debates – God vs No-God, Creation vs Evolution, ID vs Non-ID, and so on – suggest that those participating have overlooked the possibility that the Creator might, at some point, intervene to declare his presence inferentially – just as He did long ago by delivering His people from Egypt, parting the Red Sea, providing direction in a cloud by day and fire by night, and sustaining them for 40 years in an arid wilderness. Today, adopting an approach which is more in keeping with the understanding of modern man, He provides – in the very first verse of His Word – an elaborate numerical cryptogram – effectively declaring, (1) His Being and Sovereignty, (2) the Inerrancy of His Inspired Word and, (3) the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the reality of mankind’s supernatural enemies. The Hebrew of Genesis 1:1 speaks clearly and incontrovertibly of these truths.”
from a pdf available at the above link ^
Hi Allan I hope you won’t be offended by my analysis but I’ve noticed that people of the Jewish race often have a big hang up or as we say a chip on their shoulder about Judaism and Christianity, anyway my point is that you are inferring that there were other gods I disagree in that people forget that Christ was with God and that He was begotten and not created. The same plural occurs when the Devil beguiles Eve and tells her that she and Adam would live forever and become like them. I hope you check out Bruce Cathie’s theories which explain how atomic bombs do have to have special timing . regards James
There is no such thing as ‘the Jewish race,’ and even if there was, I’m about as Aryan as they come, as far as I know, so where would ‘the chip’ come from? (Are you thinking ‘Weisbecker’ is Jewish? If you are, that’s pretty ignorant.)
Also, you write:
‘my point is that you are inferring that there were other gods I disagree in that people forget that Christ was with God and that He was begotten and not created. The same plural occurs when the Devil beguiles Eve and tells her that she and Adam would live forever and become like them.’
I have no idea how this relates to anything I put in my blog post. Maybe you could explain.
Btw, I find it bizarre that this is your response to empirical evidence that a higher power exists. (Maybe you didn’t need any evidence…)
I wasn’t inferring that you were Jewish however I looked up your name and even though it has German origins there is also a line of Ashkenazi Jews of that name, the truth is that we don’t really know our full ancestry ie for me personally my father was Scottish and my mother was supposedly English however someone told me that my mother’s name could have possibly have had a Gypsy line in it which could have a trace of Egyptian or Jewish trace. One thing is for certain when I mentioned Christ coming with the clouds your attitude was hey where did you get that from when you knew full well that it came from the Bible
However now because it suits you to quote from the Bible its suddenly OK isn’t that double standards?
Anyway I have always believed that there is an intelligent designer but not aliens and the reason I think that is the same reason men couldn’t get to the Moon because they would have to get past highly radioactive areas and other debris which means they would have to go at the speed of a boat in an ice field which would be 3knots and even slower in some areas.
You will probably be glad to hear that I won’t be commenting on your site again as I have decided to completely give up my addiction to smartphone and all kinds of microwave radiation devices, I have become aware that in the end the PTB can find us through these devices and I fear that the Totalitarian New World Order is at the gates goodbye James
For James: Naturally, I cannot speak for the host, Mr. Weisbecker, but I have enjoyed your thoughts. In the 1960s, we had a “right smart” science teacher, Mr. Swanson, that worked in Oak Ridge, TN, on the Manhattan Project during WW2.
Sorry, david but I have to ask: Given your first sentence, what does your teacher who worked at Oak Ridge have to do with anything? I mean, is there a train of thought here?
Thank you David I have enjoyed my time on Allan’s site although I made a mistake thinking he may have been Jewish, only because he hates the Bible anyways to err is human at least it proves I’m not an AI Robot
The thing is Allan did make a mistake when he stated that he was Aryan as I found out that the term was made up by an individual called Houston Stewart Chamberlain who was an upper class Englishman born with a silver spoon in his mouth
This awful man moved to Germany where he met Richard Wagner and married his daughter
Then he met Hitler Goebbels Himmler and the rest of the Nazis and they invented the Myth that the Aryans were blonde haired and blue eyed. In actual fact the Aryans were from Iran and moved to the Indus area. Allan obviously meant he was Nordic.
Anyway Todd accused me of being a liar concening my Father having worked on atomic bombs, the truth is that my Father was a Chief Technician in the RAF who joined it when he was 15 and was a highly gifted man like a lot of Scot’s in the fields of engineering and other trades. My Father went up the ladder fast and actually taught electrical theory to new trainees. In fact they tried to promote him to an officer 5 times but he turned it down as he didn’t like the English upper classes.Also they got him to fix a lot of equipment in other areas as he was a wizard at fixing anything.
He died a horrible death in old age from a tumour in his brain the size of an orange. I am convinced that he got this from being irradiated twice
That’s why I went ballistic when Todd accused me of lying, I can assure you that if I was a spook like Miles Mathis I would have got my MI6 handlers to call up a drone strike ha ha only kidding anyways I’ve broken my vow not to comment on this site again I hope Allan is over the Jewish slur, BTW Allan I will read up on your biography to get the correct picture .
James, you start with
I wasn’t inferring that you were Jewish however I looked up your name and even though it has German origins there is also a line of Ashkenazi Jews of that name…
Bullshit. You clearly WERE inferring that, unless I don’t understand English. Then you go off about how I might be jewish, notwithstanding my own knowledge that i am not.
And anyway, what does this have to do with anything?
As you say, James, you claim you won’t be commenting here any more then immediately come up with another long one.
Why would you consider calling me Jewish to be a ‘slur’? Sounds like you think Jews as a ‘race’ are inferior or evil or whatever. I don’t care for bigotry of any sort.
Btw, that you think I hate the Bible and would say this publicly is another example of your ignorance.
No need to answer this and further break your word.
My bat and my ball you are an Illuminati controlled opposition site yourself I sussed you out a long time ago ha ha ha good luck losers you are gonna need it
Thanks for another great and fascinating post Allan!.
Yes the coincidence of the moon /earth/sun numbers is too much to be a coincidence.
Talking about NDE’s (Near Death Experience – the After Life) , if you or anyone else wants a great read , check out this greatest book ever written on the subject – ‘Life in the World Unseen’ by Anthony Borgia. Even if someone can’t believe a word of it, they will be enthralled all the same. I have it in hard cover book, and it’s my favourite book ever.
And many of it’s details ring true with many NDE reports.
>> http://www.ghostcircle.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Anthony-Borgia-Life-In-The-World-Unseen.pdf
I bought the Kindle version and will get back to you after reading it. I’m in the middle of some other books now so it might be a while.
I think I’ll take a peek too. Good read, Allan.