First I have to get this off my chest: Aaron Sorkin as about as good a storyteller and writer of dialog as Hollywood as ever produced. You could call him brilliant and I wouldn’t argue. He’s also done more damage to… to truth… to the mass perception of How The World Really Works (HTWRW) than any other contemporary human, not excepting three-letter professional spooks/propagandists, from Langely/Fort Meade to Tavistock.
If you doubt that we’re being gaslit, whaddya think of this doozy?
Sorkin’s two major TV shows, The West Wing (2000 – 2007) and The Newsroom (2012 – 2014) have been major sources of his deceit. If you doubt me on this, watch just one episode of either show then try to picture how they would play now, these days, only a decade or less later.
Although it only ran for a couple seasons, The Newsroom was an especially egregious example of the methods behind his quite artful guile – the premise of the show is that a mainstream cable news network suddenly decides to… wait for it… really tell the truth. It was bad enough to try to tell us that Washington politics, i.e., The White House, is run by basically decent and honest folks, but trying to say the same about the media… I suspect that The Newsroom died early not from audience neglect, but from some version of… call it ‘terminal irony.’
But this post isn’t about that. It’s about this goddamn ‘Mandela Effect’ (I hate the term, and the idea that some are ‘inflicted’ with it, while others are not). Before I continue, I ask the reader to view the following very short video, which includes clips from Sorkin’s The Newsroom:
Note: The real target audience of the video and this post is those who will think that the sign on the bus – clearly reading ‘Sex and the City’ – is proof that the dialog is simply an error by the writer, Aaron Sorkin. I will argue that this can’t reasonably be postulated. Nor can the contradictions in the video (or ‘The Mandela Effect’ itself) be a ‘psy op’ out to gaslight the masses.
Biblical ‘changes’ are an interesting subject. I’ll add a few images as examples, like this misspelling of ‘Noah.’
What I do postulate is that this contradiction within ‘the world of a TV show’ also rules out – or at least goes against – the idea of ‘timeline jumping,’ as might be defined by some interpretations of quantum physics, i.e., ‘The Many Worlds Interpretation’ (MWI), first put forth by physicist Hugh Everett in 1957.
‘and everything that could possibly have happened in our past, but did not, has occurred in the past of some other universe or universes.’
Sounds like it could be what we’re dealing with here, doesn’t it? ‘Leakage’ from an ‘alternative branch of reality.’ (Hence the explanation that the effect is via CERN or quantum computing, which brags that it is ‘tapping into alternative realities.’)
Addendum: Those unfamiliar with quantum physics should look into this matter: The MWI is ‘accepted physics’ by many credible Ph.Ds in theoretical physics (including mainstream gatekeeper Sean Carroll). That none have come forward is unsurprising, given the intellectual grip academia has upon their careers. Note that no ‘academic’ physicists came forward to point out that damage to the top 10% of a structure (a skyscraper) cannot by the laws of physics cause the disintegration of the bottom 90%. And that’s just one example.)
‘Pisseth’ in the Bible? Many scholars say this is a recent ‘change.’
Given the acceptance of the metaphor of a TV show production representing a ‘little world of its own,’ the contradiction noted in the video implies that something else is behind the phenomenon.
#
A couple things. As many of you know, I used to work as TV writer, so I know something about the process of bringing an episode to the screen. I also know a bit about Aaron Sorkin; I tend to look into people who are both brilliant and profoundly dishonest, plus damaging to the rest of humanity. (Hence my concern with Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens.)
Although, based on the initial montage we already know that at the very least something very strange is going on with the show now titled Sex and the City, it gets stranger still when you come across conflicting versions of reality coming from the same source.
There are ‘now’ three references to men nursing infants in the King James Bible. Does that sound right?
The title ‘Sex in the City’ is repeated three times by the actors in the Newsroom scene; no doubt about that, right? (I’ve played it in slow motion to see if words might have been changed later, and came to the conclusion that they were not.) Now, you must understand that before that scene was actually shot, at least a dozen people aside from the actors read it in script form. These are the various producers (most of whom are also writers) and technical people (like the art department), any one of which can and would suggest to Sorkin that an error of fact was in the dialog, if indeed there was. (Sorkin no doubt had one or more ‘advisors’ from the broadcasting industry – several of his writers on The West Wing were ex-White House people – so you can add them to the list of folks who seem to have missed this thrice-repeated major gaffe.)
And the actors. How could that gang of twenty-something showbiz kiddos be unaware of the title to one of the major hit shows of their generation? The same of course goes for all the people who could, no, should, have caught the errors at the award shows I included. (And I’ve left out other examples, plus physical ‘residues’ like posters with ‘in’.) And how about the actors in the show, whatever its name was? How many times could Sara Jessica Parker listen to her name booming across the world hooked to the wrong name of her show, without saying something? How can any thinking human not see that something is seriously amiss here?
This may all seem obvious, but it still bears repeating, especially to those with ad hoc theories about each and every Mandela Effect (ME) they are confronted with.
Yeah, there is so much blatant disinfo on the Net that we might start distrusting our own senses.
Can you picture Sorkin typing ‘Sex in the City’ three times in dialog then writing the stage direction for the bus scene: ‘On the side of the bus are the words ‘Sex and the City’? Really? You can? It’s unlikely but you can picture it, you say? Okay. And then can you picture all the people that read the script between Sorkin’s printer and the shooting not noticing this discrepancy? Unlikely but… You can?
And then the actors, during their readings at home and then the table readings back at the set and then the shooting, with dozens looking on? How about the film editors? They asleep too? (A correction could have been dubbed in post production.)
When I first started coming across this stuff I figured it to be just another psy op. Another way to get us all to doubt our own senses, our own minds. Gaslighting. The spooks love it. It’s their job.
That would account for the bus prop contradiction, right? I mean if the boys at Langely (or Fort Meade or Tavistock or wherever) were out to fuck with our minds, they couldn’t let everyone in on it. Maybe the ignorant prop-master just took it upon himself to make the correction. Possible? (No, they didn’t get the bus-prop from the Sex and/in the City producers. They didn’t have a huge, self-referential prop lying around, I promise you.)
Yep, there’s plenty of physical ‘residues.’ But residues from what?
Do you see the problem? If ‘The Mandela Effect’ were a ‘normal’ psy op, for once I agree with the argument against ‘conspiracy theories’ that too many people would have to know. See, unlike, say, 9/11 or the fraudulent Apollo missions, the ME as psy op is not a matter of ‘where the video feed comes from’ (with both 9/11 and Apollo, virtually everyone was getting the imagery from a video feed).
But think about it. In this case all of those I’ve mentioned, hundreds of them if you count the legitimately screwy MEs I included in the video (plus those I left out)… these people had to be in on it!
What do I mean? Well, how do you think it went? The spooks told them that they’re just fooling around, playing a joke on the American people so please keep this to yourselves? Is that how you figure it went? (Although I don’t doubt that Sorkin himself is ‘an insider’ and would have gone along with it…)
Those of you who think this is a ‘normal’ psy op – that yes, we are being fucked with but nothing ‘supernatural’ or beyond the ken of science is involved — you have to answer the above questions. And more.
If it’s not a psy op, what it is it? How did all the people involved with Sex and the City get the name wrong? Yes, we are back to that question. I’m the first to say that if it only were this one show, I’d somehow write it off to…. I don’t know what…my own denial… and I’m the first to say that some people have gone over the top with this issue, listing every logo and product name that doesn’t look right. Thing is, there are many, many examples like this one. That is the problem.
Has this horror always been in the Bible? And is it a coincidence that pedophile ‘Poppy’ is smiling at us?
So no, the internal contradiction between dialog and the bus-prop does not mean the dialog was a simple mistake by Aaron Sorkin. What it means is this: ‘The Mandela Effect’ is even stranger than a glitch in The Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum physics. Not only is science as we know it somehow being twisted, but logic itself.
More to come.
Allan
What part of “the timelines have been split” DON’T you guys get?
I’ve told u that Counterpart reveals the how of ME– this explains the anomalies. All of them.
Youre not running a smart thread, here. Alan. Disappointing.
Rock in roll !
I’ll deal with bit of NWO Reporter’s comments since they seem to sum up the different disagreements. She writes:
‘What’s Orwellian is believing that punctuation marks are inexplicable magic, when they clearly make sense in context. What’s Orwellian is denying that people contract words in ordinary speech, such as “and,” and 2 consecutive “th” sounds. What’s Orwellian is believing we couldn’t possibly be mistaken about a pronoun used in children’s jingle we last heard 40 years ago (after we’re primed for what to look for, of course).’
Let’s look for logical fallacies, especially straw men. The first sentence is clearly one, since I clearly wrote that I was LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY of unnatural changes. I never did come to a conclusion, and still haven’t. So saying I ‘believe’ this is flat dishonest. She also says ‘they’ make sense in context. She gave one example. I think I’m safe in saying she didn’t check more than enough to find one that ‘made sense.’ Next sentence reads:
‘What’s Orwellian is denying that people contract words in ordinary speech, such as “and,” and 2 consecutive “th” sounds.’
When did I ever deny that? I brought up a series of instances wherein people trained to enunciate properly (actors and announcers) clearly were not contracting ‘and’ to ‘in’. ‘And’ has a hard consonant at the end, as in ‘an-da’ that makes this different from the ‘Interview with a/the Vampire’ example, which I just brought up in passing, pointing out that the book in the b.g. had ‘the’ on the cover. A minor point at best, so this is a straw man too. (Making a big deal out of an offhand comment is a straw man argument.) I didn’t even say this was an example of the ME! I just pointed out an anomaly.
And the one referring to – I assume – Mister Rogers song. I suppose here I’m guilty. I did say it was ‘the’. PERIOD. Like I couldn’t be wrong. Thing is, this is another example of one with a shitload of ‘residual’ evidence: you can find a guy who complied all the skits done on Mister Rogers’s song (like Eddie Murphy) and it’s like… 20 or more, I recall (let me know if it’s actually 18). All singing ‘the’. Clearly. You’d say that doesn’t mean anything, right? I have news: It does mean something. It means that professionals in showbiz agree with me. Have over many years. It ‘doesn’t mean anything’ because it’s a problem for you.
Note: I wrote a lot more but it’s not worth your time, so I’m deleting it. When someone starts with dishonesty, we should really ignore the rest of his/her argument. (And calling Sorkin my ‘favorite writer’, i.e., being nasty and dishonest to aggravate, with no point made… what can one say?)
Allan, the emoticon issue was blatant deception in the bible video, and you reinforced it. The video (and you) alleged there was no rational explanation for the ’emoticons,’ and that’s false. Neither the video nor you even mentioned the context: that the smileys were the closing parentheses of a pair, and the eyes were a colon that punctuated the end of a sentence.
To facilitate that deception, the video carefully avoided showing the ’emoticons’ in context, posting cell phone screen shots of the ’emoticon’ with a few surrounding words. Although the video claimed the citation for each example was provided, all I could find was the book name, in minuscule letters. The examples scrolled by so fast, it was difficult even to pause it accurately. I had to look up the context by doing a word search.
As far as actors saying the ‘wrong’ thing…they are actors. They say what they’re paid to say. Maybe their job was covert promotion of the ME. There’s nothing supernatural about actors saying anything.
The Mr. Rogers thing seems pretty easy. “The neighborhood” rolls off the tongue more easily; it seems like a better word choice. That affects memory. If you did a controlled study about this with people who had never hear of the ME, and asked them to sing the first line of the song, I think a lot of people would sing “the neighborhood”. But I’d also predict those same people could then watch Mr. Rogers sing his song, and wouldn’t even notice he said “this neighborhood” and not “the.” That is, if they are never alerted to the ME dispute about it. They wouldn’t even notice there’s a difference between the song and their memory of the song, I’d be willing to bet on it.
Blah blah blah. As I made clear, when I wrote the post I WAS IN THE PROCESS OF looking at the emoticon issue and had not come to a conclusion either way. Since you are not STUPID, I have to assume you ‘know’ that. The scare quotes are because you probably do not actually ‘know’ it, since really knowing it would damage your attempt to disassemble what I wrote.
I’ll not bother with the rest of your crapola, since it’s merely a repetition of previous crapola.
Allan
Your comment in the blog that
“Note that no ‘academic’ physicists came forward ” regarding the WTC buildings is false.
Steven Jones from BYU is probably the most famous (a physics professor)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeQs78x7Yoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkaX5n3pfZE
here are several more from many scientific disciplines including physics
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.com/signatories
Yeah, I should have written ‘very, very few’ rather than none. But FYI, Jones is a clearly a mole. You’ll have to do your own research on this, as I’ve moved on. But I suspect that many of the others in academia were likewise dirty.
My God. Thank You Allan.
I am very proud to be an AP on your home. This was incredibly informative info and was well worth the click. Not sure if I changed or its just a subject we can easily relate to after being in this reality for 62 years. Young I still am mentally at least.\
Thank you
Welcome aboard (altho I don’t know what ‘AP’ means). It’s sometimes a bumpy ride here.
The Milgram experiment may give us some insight as to why people perceive what is being discussed. But in a “lighter” version ( = preference).
Whether by ignorance, total lack of awareness, choice or by compulsive desire to fit in/conform, accepting what the majority “hears” (IN the City or AND the City) is what they go by. Thinking is not part of the decision making. Nor is observation. If they did, they would have noticed.
Perhaps conformity is the old word for “Mandela Effect.”
This however does not necessarily explain why the producers/writers would like to experiment with -alternate versions- unless they just want people to become even more unaware and dumb them down even further. Which to me is a plausible explanation.
A people that is apathetic would be ideal, no?
I meant the Asch Conformity experiment.
Yeah, but HOW do they do it?
How they influence “us?” How they organise such massive undertaking? How they get away with changes no one speaks about or seem to notice?
Sorry, I’m not sure what you mean by : it.
I’d personally be more interested in WHY they did it. HOW? We might never know. But I’ll take a stab at it.
By changing a name like you would any other brand/’name’ — business-wise. Search and Replace all instances in texts, communicate the change(s) to all people in management positions and instruct them to ‘manage’ those under them. Inform everyone (including the actors, writers etc), except the public — for they probably won’t notice and hardly have a voice.
Don’t worry about the sheep? Just do it?
In an investigation, Why usually (not always) comes after How? Re your explanation, as I say, when too many would HAVE TO know (by the nature of the op), it does not work. You can’t tell everyone on the set of a show to ‘keep your mouths shut but we’re going to pull an op (or a joke) on the world.’
Ditto when there are many other shows/movies/books/etc involved. For the 10th time: This is why I ask you all to think about How It Would Work, when you voice a theory. Not too much to ask, IMO. In this case also think about CERN, all the occultism involved, and Geordy Rose’s bragging about his quantum computer, how it is like ‘an alien god’ that opens portals to other branches of reality, plus his sly references to the ME.
CERN was built on the ruins of Appolyon, said to be the pit of hell: http://www.dealtorontohomes.com/hs/cernhell.html
See if you can get thru this. These are the same people who built CERN:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSDeExBtGGU
Sleep tight.
There IS a supernatural force at work behind the ME. The ME is designed to wake people up to the “reality” that there is a supernatural force at work all around them in their daily lives. This is a way of establishing contact between man and the supernatural force.
The ME is a super-learning event.
Just wanted to give my two cents, thanks!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95VEi0y8QMI
John Lash has one of the most interesting takes on the ME. But he also acknowledges that a lot of the ME stuff is deception.
You are hilarious. Lash starts the video by saying that the ME is a ‘divine’ experiment,’ i.e., a supernatural phenom, which is 180 degrees from everything else you have said here. Oh, but a lot of it is deception? This way you have it both ways, right? Sorry, but it doesn’t work that way. (I’m taking a chance by posting this before listening to the whole thing, but I did listen to a different cast he did on the ME, and think I’m on safe ground.)
I didn’t come here to have a pissing match, Allan. You know I admire your work a lot. But you did invite people to prove you wrong…
The ‘supernatural’ is everywhere. In fact, I think it’s one of the most important things the PTB are hiding from humanity. But I didn’t see any in the examples you provided.
I’m just sharing my perspective, for what it’s worth. I studied memory a bit in grad school, although I’m certainly no expert, but I do think what I learned helps me analyze things like this. Memory is really a complex and spectacular and mysterious thing. I don’t think anyone really understands it.
Then again, I understand I’m an Orwellian mind slave in a state of denial of reality, so what do I know?
Yeah, well if you look back, you’ll find you started the sarcasm and superiority, not me.
NWO Reporter, you are correct. John says that the ME started out as a phy-op by TPTB and was then co-opted by this supernatural force as a means of communication to the masses. Go figure….
How do you figure that NWO Reporter is ‘correct,’ given she denies that anything supernatural or unnatural is going on with the ME?
Allen, glad to hear you think I am hilarious, perhaps I should go into comedic work. Lash has 64 videos committed to “decoding” the ME. That is a lot of time and devotion. You say that you try to keep an open mind about things. All I am doing is providing another prospective on the subject.
Take it or leave it, I really don’t care. I am not hear to play ping pong with you on who said what. Have a good day.
Hey, Farmer Jim (and all). I was referring to NWO Reporter in the comment that started with ‘hilarious,’ not you. So take no offense. But I would like to know how she is correct.
Possibly Farmer Jim , a good point that Allan picked up on though is that none of the conspiracy media outlets have mentioned ME which is quite remarkable .
There is also a conflict to what you’re saying which is the TPTB work extremely hard at controlling people’s reality (through media , misinfo , intel ops , theatrical politics , race division etc, etc ) because they regard most of the populous as idiots ( probably true) who can’t look after themselves properly and are a resource to be exploited . Knowing all this the questions are , why the occult imagery at CERN? Are some of TPTB themselves occultists ? why the ME ref at CERN ? To what extent has the technology and experimentation reached at CERN ?
Excellent points, Nigel, especially the one about the alt media’s silence on the ME. This would TEND to negate that the PTB are behind it. Also, the reference to ‘Mandela’ in the CERN video CANNOT be written off as meaningless, as some here do. But does this point to the PTB being involved? Maybe. We have conflicting circumstantial evidence here. A lot about this is conflicting, which is why I cannot find a cohesive theory.
Well I for one certainly appreciate your efforts and find your natural ability to prove tricky subjects genius .
farmer Jim,
if it’s at work all around them in their daily lives then it’s a natural force and not a supernatural force.
le berger des photons,
Exactly, actually it is both at the same time.
On all the institutional religion crap…and yes I feel it is crap….Satan and God are one and the same/just read the shit ‘god’ does…it’s humans who express one or the other…good or evil…it’s like the gazelle running from a lioness…is it a fear driven run(human emotions) or a beautiful dance of creation where the gazelle is in the same state of unconcious harmonic non thought of moving in the moment…the end the same…if it escapes- elation and the light…if it dies…elation and the light…either way it just goes on with its day. Only we humans give the idea of fear/courage…good…bad……So all the institutionalized religion crap created by weak men trying to explain their lot and not HTWRW…won’t work and doesn’t play well with the human brain, but damn is it strong with our emotions and fears. I don’t like stomping on anyones beliefs…I love the supernatural…things we can’t full know or explain, but giving that power to a book that was created by men who accurately or inacurately wrote down the old camp fire stories too much power is weak to me.
I don’t think I have to ref at this stage but there is a writer and bible scholar called Neville Goddard(1905-1972) who claims the bible is a story or a road map to salvation, not history and it’s stories are allegory describing the many states of being before reaching the end state, the enlightened state of “Jesus Christ” . All the characters are not real people but states of consciousness personified , Satan is the archetype of the out of control – undeveloped ego and not some malevolent entity .
Hebrew Shatan aka satan is literally an opposing force. Makes no sense to worship an entity which endeavors to oppose you at any given opportunity.
Not that it makes any better sense to worship any person or other entity. Tangible or not.
Given what is happening with the magnetic poles and the magneto sphere, all of this discussion re: the ME seemed woefully off topic to me. But, I just re-watched the first episode of Gilligan’s Island with my eight year old daughter last night. I was singing along to the theme song and belted out “the professor and Mary Ann”, as the TV contradicted me with “and the rest…”. Definitely not how I remember it.
And, for what it is worth, I found the hour-long documentary “Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives” to be a good introduction to the Many Worlds Interpretation for the uninitiated.
The first season of Gi, the theme song says “and the rest;” the second and third seasons, it says “professor and MaryAnn.” Bob Denver is said to have helped lobby the producers to get their names included in the theme song after the first season. The first season is also in black & white; the 2nd and 3rd seasons are in color. I’m a big GI fan and have watched the entire series many times.
Gilligan’s song isn’t a ME. They did change the lyrics at some point but it was up front, I think when new characters were added. God help me, I remember the stupid song by heart too.
Awesome. It can be sung to the melody of Zeppelin’s Stairway To Heaven.
Incidentally/ Zepp ripped off the million dollar arrangement from some poor slob.
well you don’t remember because this goes by season. I guess you never watched the episodes from the “and the rest” year(s). Good example perhaps of what’s going on here in a lot of cases. Both are right at different times.
Just asked my wife , ” Is it sex in the city or sex and the city ” and she replied in a heart beat “sex in the city ” . I said “are you sure 100 %? ” and she replied again extremely confidently ” yes 100%” . She actually still thought it was sex in the city after she looked it up which was weird so I told her to look again .
Here’s a question , the author moved from Connecticut to New York and then wrote a book based on her sexual experiences , so my question is – Would you name your book “sex in the city” or “sex and the city” ? To me if your living there “in” sounds like a more real personable experience living there whereas “and” has a more distant remote feeling like your writing a fiction of another place .
I haven’t read the book unfortunately but is there anybody who has willing to comment on the context ?
I agree that “sex in the city” sounds more natural. That makes “sex AND the city” the more interesting, attention-arresting title.
I remember several instances of myself having that, “–What? Oh, right” reaction to seeing the title written “Sex AND the City” — that is, there were several instances of my expectation (“sex IN the city”) being overturned, back when it was current.
There is a whole other point here, and I agree that ‘in’ is a better title (there is sexually innuendo to ‘in’). Usually tho, the changes are negative, i.e., bad writing (when it’s a movie, say). The Luke/no I’m your dad’ from Star Wars is a great example. ‘No, I am your father,’ doesn’t even really make contextual sense. Same with ‘life is/was a box of chocs’ etc. The ‘new’ versions are usually bad writing. ‘We need a bigger boat’ is clearly better than ‘You’ since at this point in the story Spielberg should be telling us that the crew is now united against the shark. So ‘We’ does that.
I could go on but as a writer, I noticed this immediately. What it means is another thing.
My wife said ‘and’….so interesting.
You need to up your game pal
Question: The ME is said to be altering physical objects already in existence, such as DVD covers, books, photos, etc. In essence, it seems to be any media, broadly defined, that we can watch, read or listen to.
Is the ME also altering physical objects in nature, or outside of media? Things like gardens, buildings, streets, landscapes? If the ME is some kind of alternate universe, wouldn’t these things also be altered?
I can’t comment on things being altered but I’ll tell you about something that made me sit up…..a few days ago I commented on here about the CERN logo looking like a series of 6’s or 9’s and then the next morning on the way to work ( which is 10 mins away in the country and I only normally see about 40 cars max ) 2 cars passed me going in the other direction( not at the same time) and one had 3 nines and the other had 3 sixes on the number plate , now what is the odds for that ?
Nigel, sounds like something completely different. Synchronicity, maybe. There really is lot of ‘supernatural’ in the world.
I already have a good idea what’s going on there (not ME)
there where I remember the “ME” illustrated is in the back to the future series.
i think Allan’s right, that the ME isn’t a psyop. After all, it’s named for the problem of people clearly remembering the pomp & circumstance of Nelson Mandela’s funeral in the 1990s, and then being surprised at seeing it again in 2013 (and, apparently, different pomp & different circumstance). How would that be a psyop?
The history of the woman who coined it is interesting, I believe her name is Broom. She allegedly noticed a “common misconception” that Mandela died in the 1980s at a party, when the topic came up. Whether there actually is such a “common misconception” among those who have never heard of the Mandela Effect is unclear. Then she apparently lost interest in the issue and handed the torch to others to run with.
There were news stories that ran in the 1980s about how Mandela was in poor health and not expected to live long. That could be a source of the confusion (if indeed there really was any), although it’s also possible news stories falsely reporting his death ran–not much from those days is online, so it’s hard to say.
And of course, the minute you ask someone whether they remember Mandela dying in the 1980s, you ‘prime’ them to remember Mandela dying in the 1980s. That’s how a lot of these ME things work: take a subject no one has ever thought much about, and likely hasn’t thought about at all in years, then ‘prime’ them with the idea there’s an inconsistency that many others have noticed. People ‘primed’ this way will be much more likely to incorporate it into their own memories.
Here is more evidence that it has always been “Sex IN the City”. As of 2015 the number 1 knock-off item imported into the U.S. was Sex IN the City perfume (not Sex AND the City). Knock-offs are EXACT names of items such as Rolex (not Rolax or Yolax).
I have a staunch progressive socialist liberal ain’t budging neighbor who states she believes in Jesus but doesn’t believe in God. (History undeniably proves that Jesus lived). However, because she doesn’t believe that Jesus is the Son of God, she doesn’t believe in God.
Psalm 14:1 King James Version (KJV)
14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
~Kimberlie
Please name a resource which provides an historical record of Christ.
No one knew of him or wrote of him in his time.
Not true. Jesus is very most likely a myth. I gave links that show this from a very well learned individual. Their may be a God(s) and they very well may have traits of the many gods of antiquity. But since the gods never said anything a wiseman can think up by himself they appear manufactured from human thought. Jesus has traits and sayings of Horus, Dionysus, Mithra, Buddha and Krishna along with story in a longer form is written on the Sumerian tablets
It is probably one of the more syncretic religions out there.
For instance one would need to sift through the below and choose the right words in order for it to be the word of God.
“The New Testament is now known, in whole or in part, in nearly five thousand Greek manuscripts alone. Every one of these handwritten copies differ from the other one It has been estimated that these manuscripts and quotations differ among themselves between 150,000 and 250,000 times. The actual figure is, perhaps, much higher. A study of 150 Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke has revealed more than 30,000 different readings It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the New Testament in which the manuscripts’ tradition is wholly uniform.”
But really, you don’t have to look and you can believe what you wish even though you’re on a site supposedly following the truth wherever goes.
You are on the mark regarding so many things, Erich; but you are dead wrong about the shape of the earth/realm we inhabit. Open your eyes just a little bit wider; not saying it’s “flat”, but we are not on a ball flying thru space. I mean, Polaris? As a sailor, can you honestly say we are moving through space at incredible speeds when this beautiful luminary has sat in the same position for a thousand years, or more? I sail, myself– old fashioned sloops off Ireland/Isle of Man– and have seen way over the horizon with optical tech,,,how you haven’t is beyond me.
As for the temporal anomalies? You are spot on– it’s no trick, the timelines have been “split” decades ago,,,in Germany, I believe,,,check out the TV show, Counterpart,,,,the writers are telling you something,,,just as Chris Carter was fed storylines from the NSA.
p.s. freaking Amish? Youd get better answers and insights from a crack-whore, my good man
With respect to the last line, what if you are asking about organic gardening of heirloom vegetables?
Lol~ Okay, ya got me there,,,I guess it’s the blue-sky thinking on Alan’s part that struck me as overly ambitious in that particular instance! Dutch fundamentalist Protestants wouldn’t have much to offer when it comes to the old blue-skyin’,,,,especially those who emigrated centuries ago, and have lived lives of virtual isolation ever since. As with any fundamentalist, I guess, they’ll say black is white if they’re so inclined, and theres nothing any normal, rational person can do about it. “Person” being the operative term,,,,bipedal, rope-belted, mouth-breathing country bumpkin creatures of any stripe notwithstanding.
But hey, maybe that says more about me than it does anybody else. Ya gotsta know what ya don’t know, be open to new ideas, and that has to be a good start.
tell us more about your optics which see light traveling in curved paths.
The Spanish version was released as “Sexo En La Ciudad.” That really helps the confusion.
On the brighter side, none of this is likely to matter, given how overdue we are for a major extinction event. This is another subject I can’t help but look into. If you want to know how it’s likely to go, you can start here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui6BLAyXLZA
That’s just the tip of the ‘berg in terms of evidence. (Sure does explain all those underground facilities. Hopefully, it will be a Hyper-Nova Event of 10^52 ergs or better, which will disintegrate the planet entirely, and all the scumfucks and their Useful Idiots along with it. One can only hope.)
Thoughts, memories, new information/data… so much to fret over, so little time to find the “Truth”…
Doesn’t it behoove us to examine all the information/data before making conclusions? Sure. But it’s impossible for even the most brilliant of human minds to process it all and it’s constantly growing. Thanks to the information age, we’ve passed the limits of the human brain to be able to collect, interpret and conclude the “Truth”. Even super computers cannot scour all the new information and newly discovered old information and be able to conclude the “Truth” because there will always be more information flowing in while they are concluding. The “Truth” is always evolving in the NOW (including this “absolute” statement).
For humans, the best version of the “Truth” (let’s call it truth 1.0) is destined to be somewhat inferior to artificial intelligence’s best version of the “Truth” (we’ll call this truth 2.0). We’re on the verge of exponentially increasing our incoming stream of data with a new network called 5G. If A.I. can get up to speed in combing through all this new data from 5G it will be closer to the “Truth” (call it truth 2.1) but it will still, always be behind the evolving changes in “Truth” at any time it pauses to make a conclusion. Once the conclusion is made, it’s automatically obsolete. That’s life! You have to be like a Zen Master to be able to live comfortably with that.
Here are some interesting thoughts about the coming 5G network:
20 predictions about 5G – good, bad and scary!
https://news.sky.com/story/sky-views-20-predictions-about-5g-good-bad-and-scary-11643359
The “Mandela Effect” (ME) is merely a supporting equation in the “Grand Unified Theory” (GUT) otherwise known as “Murphy’s Law” (ML).
Perrat comes directly to us from US GOV spook central which may impact his credibility somewhat.
Maybe they didn’t get the rights to show the actual show title on the bus?? Either way…it is different from the dialogue…I’ll ask my wife…she watched that shit.
Hi Allan~
We know it was Sex IN the City. I don’t know how or why this shift/Mandela Effect/Change has come about. What I DO KNOW is it has. Many people know it has. The only explanation I’ve come up with is this ‘phenomena’ is REAL and comes directly from the wickedness of Satan himself. There are MANY things that are beyond our understanding. We are in the End Times. America has turned its back on God. The people want Barabbas. (Mark 15:15… ‘Wishing to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas for them, and after having Jesus scourged, he handed Him over to be crucified.’)
The people do not want the Truth, therefore, God has given them over to strong delusion. Satan is the author of deception… he is the father of lies.
Kind regards,
~Kimberlie
“We” do? Always been Sex AND the City in my reality.
Same here, “Sex AND the City”.
But I’ve watched movies or TV shows where it’s bugged me that someone’s name (a main character) gets pronounced at least two different ways — like, most of the people calling Louis “LOO-is” and then someone says “LOO-ee”, or a “Reagan” being mostly “Ray-gun” until someone throws in a “Ree-gun”. It knocks me out of the story briefly, as I wonder why the director didn’t standardize how the name is to be said. I’ll provide an example as soon as I remember one.
Discussing ME with my daughter; she remembers many years ago trying and failing to get to a particular party (getting lost; calling her hostess but not getting through). Her best friend, her best guy friend and her own sister all remember her at the party. This forum just referenced that multiple-eyewitnesses-in-agreement thing, so that’s a fairly strong argument for party attendance. Otoh, getting lost in the night and failing to find the party is also a pretty strong memory. So what really happened?
(an aside: the baby-eating thing is creepy *and it’s supposed to be*: it’s an attempt to convey the depth of the horror of a famine. This is not me defending the Bible, this is me defending *storytelling*. That incident was not meant to portray *ordinary* life! How long has it been in the Bible? Don’t know, don’t care.)
What it sounds like the announcer is saying in the video is “Sex ‘n the City.” It could be intentionally ambiguous, that’s possible, but that pronunciation is common. Just like it is common to truncate two “th” consonants in a row, pronouncing only the vowels, and making “interview with the vampire” indistinguishable from “interview with a vampire.” Most people have probably heard those pronunciations hundreds or thousands of times more often than they have carefully examined the pronouns on the cover of their DVDs.
If the ME is a psy-op, and its purpose is to desensitize people to the idea that contradictions between ‘reality’ and what they remember are common and not the result of intentional deception, then it works whether you believe the ME is simply faulty memory, or something ‘supernatural’ like alternate universes.
So far, from what I’ve seen, they are just finding and spinning instances where minor memories, usually remote in time, are inaccurate, for various completely normal and understandable reasons, in light of memory research.
Once people accept the idea that either they can’t trust their memories, or there is some kind of supernatural force behind it, they can ramp it up to include more and more substantive memories, that people actually should trust themselves on. That minimizes the potential for revolt against the intentional modification of history by the powers that be. They don’t care if people blame their own faulty memories or alternate universes, as long as they don’t blame those responsible.
It’s like you are completely ignoring my post and the video. You do not seem to understand that if it’s a psy op, it’s like no other before: You will cherry pick, but how did they get the scores of people involved in the Sex and/in the City scam to agree to be in on it? Oh, Sex and/in the City isn’t part of it, you say?
Then you have to answer the relevant questions in my post, which you will not do (I predict).
‘The Party told them to reject the evidence of their eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.’ Orwell, 1984
That you would claim that all these people are saying ‘and’ when ‘in’ is clearly what they ARE saying, reminds me of Orwell, even thought your obvious intention is to try to reject the lies you are being told. I guess, though, since you’ve already made up your mind, what else could you do?
Remember that for me, for quite a while, I assumed it was a psy op — as i say above, ‘How can any thinking human not see that something is seriously amiss here?’ But looking into it further, I CHANGED MY MIND, realizing that it could not work in a ‘normal’ way. It just never occurred to me to insist people are saying ‘and’ when they clearly are not. (How many times do you need to hear Ms Parker say ‘in the City’? How many???)
‘People never change their minds about anything.’ If I’ve learned anything from this blog, that’s it. I mean, except me. I’ll do it, even if I can’t explain the results. Just the way it is.
No, it’s not ‘clear’ that’s what people are saying, especially the announcer at the beginning. Some of the others did seem to say “in the city”, and may very well think it’s “Sex in the City”, just like millions of other people do. So what? And maybe your favorite writer did intentionally facilitate the ME, by insisting the actors say “in the city” when they knew better. But again, so what? If this is a psy-op, that would be expected.
Are you claiming that “interview with the vampire” doesn’t sound exactly like “interview with a vampire” in ordinary pronunciation, too?
Are you claiming that “interview with the vampire” doesn’t sound exactly like “interview with a vampire” in ordinary pronunciation, too?
You, sir, are quite delusional.
Loalhero, delusional? Hardly. There are 2 “th” sounds in row in “with the”. Unless someone is specifically trying to clearly enunciate every word, they will contract the 2 “th” sounds into one in ordinary speech. That means the word “the” sounds just like the word “a” would. It isn’t rocket science and it isn’t delusion. You can verify it with common sense and observation.
None of the instances of the ME you’ve brought up seem ‘unnatural’ at all after a little investigation, in light of what little I know about how memory works. It only seems unnatural if someone mistakenly believes that memory is like a video camera.
But as I said, it doesn’t really matter–the PTB are probably chuckling about the contention this issue is creating in alt media. As long as people blame either their own faulty memory or the supernatural for the intentional alteration of history and reality, that’s all that matters.
I replayed it a number of times Allan normal and slow, and it sounds like Sex “IN” the City to me during the awards and when Ms Parker repeats it. I also turned on Closed Caption (CC) and it too says Sex “IN” the City. And, CC was able to differentiate AND vs IN in other parts of Ms Parker’s sentences. Even CC has “IN” during it’s playback when Sex IN the City comes up during their round table discussion. Again here too, CC was able to differentiate ANDs vs INs in other sentences.
Thanks, Todd. I didn’t even think of doing that — it’s so obvious what they are saying. It truly is Orwellian when people actually HEAR what they want to, to keep their worldview intact, which is what is happening with some commenters, apparently (especially comments on the video itself).
By the way, your comment will have no effect on anyone, other than that they will dislike me even more. As I say in my last book: ‘Lie about someone and they get mad. Tell the truth and they get outraged.’
That will be at work here.
Hi Allan~
I couldn’t agree more. That’s exactly what it is. People want to hear what they want to hear in order to keep their ‘truth’ intact. Indeed… this is a typical 1984 Orwellian screenplay!
I believe ‘something’ ‘super evil’ has occurred with all the changes in the Bible(s). I cannot prove who what when where or why (and I know that I want to prove anything because I do not want to get close to the demonic forces that are at play here), however, I have a strong inclination to point my finger at the D-WAVE and CERN to be the culprit of introducing and providing a way for these things to happen: opening the gate/portal/door to release the demonic forces.
I believe in God. I believe in Jesus. I believe in the Holy Spirit.
That’s all I need.
Allan, you are on the right track here. Again, thank you so much for bringing this “Mandela Effect” at least to my attention. Until you brought this up I was completely in the dark on the subject!
Blessing and very kind regards to you,
~Kimberlie
What’s Orwellian is believing that punctuation marks are inexplicable magic, when they clearly make sense in context. What’s Orwellian is denying that people contract words in ordinary speech, such as “and,” and 2 consecutive “th” sounds. What’s Orwellian is believing we couldn’t possibly be mistaken about a pronoun used in children’s jingle we last heard 40 years ago (after we’re primed for what to look for, of course).
I’m going to try to get out of your hair on this issue, Allan, because like I said, the psy-op is the issue itself, IMO, and it works whether you believe your memory is fallible or it’s magic. Believe the ME is supernatural if you want, but your attacks on people explaining how it can happen without magic have been really low, as well as wrong.
You could have ripped apart the bible video as blatant propaganda–it was filled with so many of the usual tactics of manipulation. You remember the guy who claimed he took a picture of 2 bible verses, and then showed it to his friend, after which the photo changed? Did he really show the photo to his friend, or did he tell his friend about it? Did you catch his slip? If he were part of the FE clan you would have torn him apart along with the video.
Sorry to be so contentious. In general I think you have exceptionally keen insight and attention to detail. On this issue, not so much. It’s weird, TBH. Maybe I’ve wandered into a parallel universe.
Todd, the fact that you had to slow down the video to get more certainty about what’s being said just proves my point: People contract the word “and” in ordinary speech, and to some degree the word “in”, and the result is “‘n”. The fact that half of them don’t know whether it’s “and” or “in” just muddies the waters further. That doesn’t mean reality changed.
When Sex in the City came out on TV, I remember it as Sex IN the City. Also makes sense because these chicks always wanted to fuck guys in the city, no?
You can try to generalize what I heard, but for me, I heard it the first few times thru at normal speed and heard “in” and NOT “and”. It was especially clear when only Ms Parker was repeating it over and over. I only slowed it down to make sure what I originally heard was correct and give this some real thought. For added measure, I then used CC to see what came up. It too also had “in” anytime Sex in the City words came up in that sequence. “and” didn’t come up at anytime. Plus CC was able to correctly distinguish all the “and’s” an all the “in’s”.
How do you explain that?
But this is being selective because, as Allan has pointed out, many other examples can be found. I too was skeptical at first, but the more I looked into this, it appears there are legitimate cases out there. Many, I would say probably are not, which would be a PTB tactic to get you to throw the baby out with the bath water. Throw in some good ME BS examples, causing you to throw them all out and what you are left with is something like Flat Earth nonsense where everything is discredited.
Hope this help anyone (who’s really looking for truth) that may be on the fence to dig a bitter deeper. Don’t dismiss it so quickly.
Todd, I’m just not sure what anything you said has to do with supernatural alterations of reality. Some people remember “and”, and some remember “in”, and I’m sure 99.9% of the population didn’t even give a damn or pay any attention before the ME thing.
It’s entirely possible scenarios are being set up to facilitate the ME op, that would be expected. If someone who should know is deliberately saying something else, that could be the case. Others could just be mistaken about what by any measure is surely an insignificant detail of life. Maybe the CC machine got it right, maybe it deliberately got things wrong, or was in error, but again, what does any of this have to do with supernatural alterations of reality?
‘People never change their minds’ Yes you have,you went with evolution at the beginning and do to your way of thinking you are now in supernatural land explaining the obvious according to you.
In reality you appear to some to be like this.
https://www.theonion.com/true-courage-is-knowing-you-re-wrong-but-refusing-to-ad-1819584895
NWO is exactly right. The “d” sound from “and” running into the hard “th” sound from “the” blends together so your ear could break off the “and” at the N sound.
Think about it. If the band Guns ‘n Roses were called “Guns and the Roses” many people would hear “Guns IN the Roses”.
This is a common thing to mis-hear things. Perhaps people at the Oscars or on set at the Newsroom actually said “Sex in the City” but are really going down this psy op path for this? It’s embarrassing.
Have you see the Yanny / Laurel thing?
What about Daft Punk singing “Up all night to get lucky” but hearing “Up a Mexican monkey” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MAdAfZOiqg
Or the more recent Ariana Grande “Thank You, Next” is actually “Bacon, Eggs” https://youtu.be/H43h-YAMp4A?t=99
Or this comedian’s bit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpdUkqmrkCY
C’mon friends. The psy op is trying to get us to believe “Sex and the City” is a psy op.