Kentucky COVID Numbers Analysis

by  on  in Blog • 16 Comments

To be safe, I’m going to have to nix my last post. I am not getting the same results as of today and last night. It’s certainly possible that an A.I. caught on to my doings and in effect nullified the algorithm, either just for my searches or globally (the latter being unlikely), and I didn’t get enough feedback from you guys to be sure either way.

I really thought I’d caught them but my ignorance of how algorithms actually work is a problem. Possibly ‘Chris’ is correct in his comment that the websites themselves use an algorithm to create more traffic. I just don’t know.

So never mind.

Addendum: I’m not nixing the prediction that as the world goes digital and hard copies (of anything) are fazed out, history will be routinely re-written a la Orwell’s 1984, except with a vengeance.

The rest of this post will be Logan’s work on the Kentucky (where he is) COVID data, which clearly exposes an aspect of the COVID black op. He has sent this info to various media outlets, both mainstream and alt. We’ll see what kind of reaction he gets:

Please see the attached analysis compiled using data from Governor Beshear’s daily emails and the state website.  The COVID-19 mortality rates have been in a steep and steady decline for over 100 days now.  Further, the risk to those under the age of 50 is minimal at worst.  Please see the charts and key data in the two page document attached.  Why are restrictions increasing when there is an obvious inverse correlation with higher case counts and lower mortality rates?  Clearly true exposure rates are higher than just those who have been tested to date.  So actual mortality rates are far lower that even those reflected in the attached analysis.  Isn’t this important information for your viewers?
Thank you for your consideration.

I’ve embedded his graphs and further info. Please look at it, and if you agree forward this post to whomever might benefit.

Allan

 

 

These are the footnotes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Addendum: Although this has come up before, Jon Rappoport’s current newsletter bears a look. Rappoport doesn’t believe AIDS or Ebola or COVID are caused by actual external pathogens. His claim is that environmental factors are the cause of the illnesses. I don’t buy it. 

Plus, billions have been spent over many decades on bio-weapon development. Surely they are creating ‘something’ aside from environmental factors to kill us. (COVID is a classic example of this, as I’ve written about in past posts.)

Logan and I have discussed this. Here’s my email to him re todays Rappoport newsletter:

I agree that it’s very… incriminating that Gallo et al didn’t isolate the HIV virus, and the same goes (apparently) for the COVID (and others). But as I’ve said before, that doesn’t mean that a pathogen does not exist. Rappoport’s view that, for example, AIDS is caused by various environmental factors doesn’t wash. It might work for poor africans (he’s blamed ‘poppers’ for the gay epidemic) but AIDS, as it turned out, was demographically neutral. An associate of mine died of it; he wasn’t gay or poor or subject to any of the factors Rappoport lists; he was athletic and very health-conscious. He just fucked the wrong woman, apparently.
 
And then there’s the billions spent on bioweapons. Surely they were/are engineering ‘something’ aside from environmental factors to kill people.
 
So something is definitely fishy, with COVID, HIV, ebola and etc (there is evidence that they were all engineered diseases), and it is incriminating that no one has isolated these viruses, but you can’t write off the existence of specific pathogens (‘germs’) with the evidence Rappoport has come up with.
 
I highly recommend Leonard Horowitz’s book, The Emerging Viruses; Nature, Accident or Intentional.

Does HIV exist? An explosive interview

  16 comments for “Kentucky COVID Numbers Analysis”

Leave a Reply