I did a google search for ‘606 new cases’, got this page, then clicked the top story. (Next image)
Final Note: Regrettably, I’m going to have to nix this post. I’m leaving it up, however, in case someone with real cyber smarts wants to do a serious analysis of search engine corruption re the COVID black op. Anyone who does this can contact me at allan at banditobooks dot com.
Addendum (Monday, August 10): In trying to verify this post I’m getting completely different results when I do the searches. I don’t know if it’s ‘me’ or if the algorithm has been altered. I need verification.
Another long silence and I’m not sure why. Am I on the edge of giving up?
Maybe not. I came across someone on YT saying that if you plug any three digits plus ‘new cases’ (or ‘new COVID cases’) into Google you will always get a direct hit headline from some newspaper with that number of ‘new cases’ in the headline.
So I tried it and sure enough I always got a headline matching my search number. But what I did that the YT vid didn’t do is this: In a separate search I looked up that newspaper for that date and guess what? The headline was different. The other headline, the one with my imaginary number, was bogus.
Notice the date (August 8) and headline claiming 606 new cases (my arbitrary number).
I’ve done 8 such searches (again, for any three numbers plus ‘new cases’), like the above example (‘606’) and I ALWAYS get a newspaper running the story with that number in it.
I did it for 101, 202, 303, and so forth. Always the same result. When I find the real edition for that date, the headline is different.
In a separate search I got the real front page from the same newspaper on August 8, 2020 (same date). Not the same headline, is it? The other one is bogus, a fraud.
Sooooo, they have an A.I. algorithm that’s doing this. Using real newspapers and changing the headlines so no matter what you google, you get a direct hit with that number of COVID cases. It’s a dead obvious bust that we’re being fucked with. No way around it. Orwell is somewhere nodding his head. Talk about re-writing history!
Try it yourself. Only takes a couple minutes for each one. Make up a three-digit number (it will work with 2 and 4 digit numbers too) then add ‘new cases’ (or ‘new COVID cases’) and do a search. Then find the real edition of the paper for that date.
This is with a google search. Logan suggested that it might or might not be the same with other search engines. So, folks, get to it and do screen shots of your work. Try various search engines to see if they are all corrupted in this way.
A different paper, August 9, after a search for ‘101 new covid cases’.
And spread the word. Use this post or write your own stuff. This is the kind of clear cut, inarguable bust that might wake some people up. Is there any explanation other than the PTB literally rewriting history to scare us? If you know anyone who doubts that COVID is a fraud, ask them to explain this phenomenon.
They might kill this algorithm when they realize they are busted, so get to it… and record your work.
Allan
Here is the real paper. I even did a site search for ‘101’ and came up empty. A massive fraud by Google.
I want to get this out now, before they realize that this is a dead bust, that there is no other explanation, and they ‘re-re-write history’ by canceling the op…
…there are huge implications to this. Think about it. I’ll do another post after I’ve thought it through, and I’d like to hear your analyses of what this means.
If they do away with hard copies of the written word (books, all records, etc.), and make everything digital….
I only have room for one more example (I did eight). This is the real paper from Augiust 9.
This is the bogus one, same date. My search was for ‘505 new cases’. When will the history books (such as they are) be diddled like this? Do you understand the implications, especially when hard copies are a thing of the past?
Addendum: this last one may be simply two different pages from the same edition. I’ll check and get back to you. It’s not easy accessing back issues.
I believe that Google has set its search algorithm to land you on pages that will instill the most fear, in some cases (like these) going so far as to alter headlines and stories to reenforce the idea of a burgeoning pandemic, when the truth is that COVID is no more virulent than the seasonal flu. This on top of skewed ‘statistics’ based on false positive test results (anyone who has had past flu shots will likely test positive, for example).
This way, all they need do to show rising infection numbers is to test more people. Notice they avoid mentioning death stats, since deaths are getting harder to fake. As Logan’s analysis of the Kentucky state numbers shows, as the given number of ‘new cases’ increases, the percentage of deaths decreases. I’m sure this is true country-wide.
I got an email from a guy who does a podcast who picked up on this post (google and ‘new cases’), who had an expert on to analyze my findings. See if you guys understand what he said (I think he missed my point about google using real websites). Go to about 1;35;00 in. He even shows the blog, which is nice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQUdtW-l_U8&feature=youtu.be&t=4762
It’s a good show too. Worth subscribing to.
I use Epic, a privacy browser, using their encrypted proxy servers (West Coast) and it runs searches through Yahoo, which is not always ideal. But I try to stay away from Google whenever possible, except sometimes for work. Even then I use DuckDuckgo. But when I run specific numbers through yahoo, it does pull up corresponding stories, such as “404 new covid-19 cases,” pulls up “Wisconsin reports 404 new cases” June 29th story from kenoshanews.com. Or story out of Mississippi dated May 8th. Just fyi.
This is the websites manipulating the google algorithms by posting multiple headlines and/or putting in keywords for searches that match entire swaths of numbers. Also “update” articles often have constantly changing numbers. This is people trying to get more clicks. Google doesn’t run those websites.
This is also a good example for journalists why you shouldn’t have a headline that say 205 new cases or whatever, when the total will be different tomorrow, or even later that day. You can only change the number so many times before you just give up and change the headline.
Are you saying that the news media sites themselves are creating the bogus headlines? seems so.
Yes. Google is only recording what the websites say. Many websites manipulate the headlines to keep articles trending.
You can post the same article in the same place, but keep changing the headline, then informing google about the change. The effect is that while the current headline you get is the most recent, google can spit out all of them, as they were all accurate at some point, if google took a snapshot of the article when the website notified them of the change.
Good , you have finally woken up to the evil lying media, and their fake plandemic.
I hope you threw that mask in a fire!.
What do you mean ,finally’? What I was wrong about was only the virulence of the bioweapon. Have you woken up to the fact that there is one? The one with HIV in its genome, which proves it was engineered? Among other evidence, as in the Boyle interview?
I’m ignorant of the tech details re algorithms but it doesn’t sound right that the paper inserted, say, the ‘606’ inthat headline, given that it’s almost certainly a bogus number.
Alan I told you about 7 months ago, there was a much worse flu/bronchitis bug going around the traps worldwide – 2 years ago!…and it hardly made the news. Well it didn’t make the news really.
And overall – it was pop-gun poor/a fizzer as a bioweapon. Yes we know they engineer these bugs.
BTW, we STILL don’t know any one, *who even knows anyone*, who came a gutser or had trouble with this crap toyotacorona19 B.S. bug.
The only terribly harmful & damaging blight (and deadly of course), has been the TV set & govts. worldwide.
And yes, I stand by my word ‘finally’ on Chris’s posts history.
Just remember the number of articles and headline changes you are dealing with. More than five digits matching would surprise me. Three… meh. Btw, not trying to discourage anyone. It’s just that I have found similar irritating results from searches where the saved. website results didn’t match the website. But it wasn’t important stuff.
Hey everyone, I think yah should send Allan a dollar if you can. It is tough times.
This coming from someone who often disagrees with him. But, it might help. I wish I could.
Allan,
I have admired your writing since I first read “In Search of Captain Zero” which led me into “Cosmic Banditos” and “Can’t You Get Along with Anyone?”
The foremost line in your current blog entry is “Am I on the edge of giving up?” As much as I admire your conviction about the truth of what is happening, the fact of the matter is that the masses of people are simply too fucking stupid to understand what is happening to them!
What I would like to see is for you to drive somewhere to a secluded break and catch some waves and write a new book about the solitude of being on the ocean and having the world make sense to you on a wave.
If that is not option for you, you are roughly 150 miles south of where you need to be. Northern New Mexico is alright, but the center of the universe is in the San Luis Valley of Colorado. Specifically, Crestone, Colorado.
Trust me on this one.
Cory
Crestone is an alien hive. Much like Los Alamos NM. Center of the Universe I can tell you is NOT on or around where white men stay.
Allan, I thought you weren’t going to entertain any discussion of Covid being anything other than a bioweapon?
It is a bioweapon but how does that relate to media fraud?
This is sophistry, but if you have to toe the ‘Covid19 is a bioweapon’ angle, I guess you can try and maintain both angles, i.e. that 99.999% of all cases/symptoms/deaths are misclassified (flu, pneumonia, lung cancer, bullet wound, cliff fall, etc.), with 0.001% being due to a highly contagious bioweapon that was accidentally/deliberately released from Wuhan.
So, you’re effectively admitting Covid19 is an entire fabrication (like Ebola), whilst maintaining your position that it’s definitely a bioweapon.
Will your handlers let you off with that?
My ‘handlers’? Go fuck yourself. Given my history and some of your comments, it’s more likely that you have a handler.
Addendum to this comment: Please see the addendum up top. Some strangeness going on here!
I’m pretty sure my point is correct here, i.e., there are phony headlines concocted to keep us thinking about the escalating case numbers via google search results. Some of these number-matching headlines are inarguably bogus. There may be legitimate explanations for some of them. I’ll get back to you on this later today.
I’d appreciate verification on this from those of you who have the time to do the searches.
Alphabet Corp (abc.xyz) owner of Google/Youtube is for sure a CIA asset…so dont be surprise. Personally i searched the number between 100 and 200 and all the first result where located in Canada (mostly in Ontario or Quebec province where i live)…Again personnaly i lose my job , i’m not allowed to travel, i’m force to wear a mask in public closed place for a virus I know nobody wich know somebody wich got the bug, not killed by the bug but just catch the bug…very odd at least…i dont know if you realise the generation of germophobe this shit will create, its also amost like a war situation where school is poolry serve so it will create a under educated generation too…But we have to stay calm because Soros, Gate, Rockfeller, Rotshild name it dont have enough money in their bank account they need more , and more, and more…i have pity for them will start a GoFundMe for them, alone in their Castle life most be very cruel
Remember the Wayfair scandal? All the SKU numbers on their oddly priced products led to pages of photos of children.. ? Before they scrubbed it, the store was selling things like 4 little pillows for $10,000. I have never seen a scandal this obvious, sink this fast.
Yeah, what happened to that? Good point.
I did not get any bogus headlines when doing a DuckDuckGo search in Mozilla/Firefox.
Most people are not aware that Google’s parent holding company (Alphabet Inc.) also has a pharmaceutical/vaccine division (Calico, I think).
It is either evidence of an algorithm designed to stoke virus fear or of an algorithm designed to stoke mistrust of the internet as a news source. It also could be a joke, which if that is the case, could be explained away by the PTB as further evidence for the need to police the internet for our own good. Either way it’s evidence of a conspiracy on the part of someone.
The second Trib example has August 9 at the very top and June 28 above the story.
fwiw
Really glad you avoided jail. Not good anytime, but very dangerous now.
best wishes,
I only did one check on this as I’ve got to get to work. I google searched “231 new cases” and got a hit for khon2.com in Hawaii for 8/8/20. So in another window I keyed in the domain name and saw their Corona subheading. I clicked on that then expanded it at the bottom to see yesterdays stories. The headline was exactly the same as the Google search one. Make of that what you will.
That’s one. I did eight and you see the results.
Yup. put in 320,230 and 100 and that’s what I got each time respectively using Google
That’s one. I did eight and you see the results.
.what did u get?
I would like to meet the people at GOO-Gall who concepted/implemented this algorithm And squarely kick their ass. It’s a crime against humanity to use such technology against people in general.
Hi Allan, good to see you are not trapped under duress with those cops n robbers.
I gather they have buzzed off – never to come back, and have left you in peace?? (as much as that is possible in this day and age).
I am slightly amazed, but then again, not surprised with your “covid net spider” findings.
The insane madness & straight out fraud from all our “leaders” is at an all time high.
Just when I think it couldn’t get any worse – it does – day by day….the people are revolting in droves, and ‘they’ are slashing and burning most of the evidence.