Got tired of working on the Sam Harris exposé – it’s complex and I worry about length – and aspects of the ME (Mandela Effect) keep resurfacing. Like ‘the moon numbers,’ if it’s real it’s a game changer. (The Moon Numbers are a game changer for anyone the least bit thoughtful and who has been a materialist; the implications are both profound and inarguable.)
A new version of Cosmic Banditos (Italian) just came out, plus a nibble from H-wood. We’ll see.
Addendum: Over the past few days three people have signed up for my ‘Gas Money’ monthly contribution ($3.25) as a way of saying that they do get something from my posts. This puts me in the black to tune of five or six bucks a month! So it looks like I’ll hang in: I don’t want to disappoint my new blog-friends. Others have emailed, saying they believe I have something to offer, which has the same effect as the donations.
But what? What do I have to offer, at least on this subject? One thing is that I’m a writer. A fairly competent one, at least until recently. But even with my waning talent/intellect I may have thoughts that are worthwhile. We’ll see.
Along those lines, meaning me as a writer, one thing I’ve noticed about ‘the changes’ (get used to scare quotes) is that the movie-related ones — and keep in mind I did a lot of screen writing — all have one thing in common, and there are implications here: The ‘new’ versions represent bad writing. This in fact just jumps out at you. I’ll give some examples…
‘Luke, I am your father’ is ‘now’ ‘No, I am your father,’ right? No doubt about it. Try to find a copy of the actual movie that says anything other than the latter and you’ll come up empty. (Notwithstanding talking toys and other ‘residues’ of the former version.) This is an inferior line of dialog for what should be obvious reasons.
52 states? More ‘bad writing’ from H-wood or…
Vader is replying to Luke saying ‘Obe Wan told me that you killed my father,’ so the reply ‘No’ is, technically, denying that Obe Wan told this to Luke. We know that’s not what the line means, but that’s from context; the question being Why would George Lucas allow the most important line in the whole Star Wars Saga to be unclear in meaning?
Never mind that James Earl Jones remembers the ‘correct’ line and so forth. This is not about that. I am only making the point that the ‘change’ represents bad writing.
Let’s try Lucas’s pal Spielberg. ‘We’re gonna need a bigger boat’ is now ‘You’re gonna need a bigger boat’ in Jaws, right? Although the ‘bonding’ scene (it would be a ‘campfire scene’ in a western) when the boys compare scars and sing is still to come and the initial hostility is not yet over, Brody’s saying ‘You’ as opposed to ‘We’ separates him from the situation. This moment — immediately after Brody alone sees the shark, so Brody is the only one who knows what they are up against — is the right time for a vibe of ‘us against the monster,’ not ‘You against the monster.’ Brody is on the boat, not talking from a radio.
A ‘Sex IN the City’ residue from NZ.
This is not on the same level of bad writing as the Star Wars line, but a talent like Spielberg should not have let this line make it into his movie. And I’m saying that… somewhere… some time… he did not.
‘Life is like a box of chocolates’ is still more bad writing, as most of you know without knowing why. Need I say more than this writer’s rule: Present tense is stronger than past? I could explain why this is especially the case here, but others have already done so. Bad writing. From Robert Zemeckis, who has helmed pretty much nothing but great cinema storytelling?
As you guys may already know, my personal least favorite bad writing would have to be Mister Rogers singing ‘It’s a beautiful day in this neighborhood’ rather than (what I vividly recall, but we’re leaving memory out of this essay) ‘…the neighborhood’… This is bad writing because Mister Rogers is trying to bond with the kids, not tell them that his neighborhood’ is beautiful, although who knows about yours. (It’s also inferior musically, ‘this’ having an awkward tempo compared to ‘the’. Go ahead and sing both versions out loud. Which rolls off the tongue naturally?) Yep, bad writing.
A major ‘residue’ is this Carson gag showing that Ed did work for PCH.
Although ‘Dolly’s Braces’ is not dialog writing, the matter (the logic gaffe as it is ‘now’) surely is screen writing, which I do know something about. In fact, this one is so brazen and obvious that — if you’re not already aware of the details — I’ll send you here, to save time.
By the way, searching Youtube for a good explanation of ‘Dolly’s Braces,’ I’m reminded of a point I made before but which bears repeating: Virtually no ‘alt media’ outlets are covering this issue; I had to plow through a long line of amateurish crapola to find one that doesn’t waste our time with personal details and pleas and redundancies and dumb ass theories. Given that the take away from the Mandela Effect would be a distrust of own memories, it would seem to be perfectly in synch with the PTB agenda. Why are they so quiet about it? This is a big question and must be dealt with.
Addendum: As I’ve said, my current theory is that the ME is a psy op that got out of control. And yes, CERN and/or quantum computing are involved (CERN’s occultist hints and the music vid with the ‘Mandela’ sign are the major clues.)
Even ‘Sex and the City’ is an example of bad writing: Aside from the superior rhythm of ‘Sex in the City,’ the word ‘in’ is a subliminal sexual reference, as opposed to ‘and.’ It looks better, flows off the tongue way better and does not separate the idea of ‘sex’ from ‘the city’ but rather combines them (into one funky, stinky, yuppie scum, PTB agenda-loving whole). If you think these issues are too subtle to make any difference, you don’t know marketing, public relations, or how those shitball motherfuckers think. Still more bad writing.
Does this look like the work of dedicated scholars?
I’ll only briefly touch upon the Bible changes, although some of these may be the best examples of all; do your own research here and try to get past the irrational ‘platform’ of many of the evidence presenters. Interpret the low quality videos as a further indication that the mainstream and alt medias want nothing to do with the Mandela Effect. Many of the Bible folks never made videos before and most are as far from ‘conspiracy’ thinking as you can get. They simply know what they know and felt compelled to warn us all. Nuts as they are about believing that book to be the word of our Creator, most are pretty pure in their motives, which is more than we can say about 95% of the Net.
A good source for checking Bible quotes is this one, in which you can do some creative word searches. I plugged ‘new wine’ into the tool and got this:
I don’t give a shit. It was THE neighborhood!
Does this passage make sense to you? Of course not, the reason being that the original text used ‘wine skins’ and it has been… mistranslated is the only proper description, not only for accuracy/logic (bottles don’t ‘perish’ when refilled) but for historical context: glass bottles didn’t exist at the time of the original writing.
The above is from the King James Version (KJV); many translations (there are scores) still use ‘wine skins’. But the KJV is the main one, worldwide. Anyone who doubts that there is something very strange going on here should look into the history of Bible translations. What you invariably find (and this is important) is that the translators were all dedicated scholars engaged in their life’s work. Let that sink in, then ask yourself if a dedicated scholar engaged in his/her life’s work would flippantly switch words that remove the logic, aside from the ‘feel of the times’, from a Biblical passage.
I would answer no, I cannot picture this. My point being that with the Bible we get still more bad writing. We know, without doubt, that with the ‘wine skins’ to ‘bottles’ change, bad writing from dedicated scholars is precisely what we have gotten (unless something else entirely is going on, but in this essay we are assuming that).
Right. 186 mistakes from dedicated scholars.
The difference between ‘bad writing’ and ‘sacrilege’ (‘changes’ that demean Christianity) can be argued. Was it there before? Was it changed? These points can be dealt with on a case by case basis, but we know the wine skin/bottles change is not likely to have been done in the normal course of translation.
The same goes for ‘corn’ being substituted for ‘wheat’ or ‘grain,’ given that corn did not come to the Middle East for hundreds of years after the writing of the Scriptures, and the translators knew that. So the one hundred eighty-six (186) references to ‘corn’ in the current KJV are likewise all examples of bad writing.
Although I have little interest in the myriad of logos and company names that people claim are different, the few times I’ve personally noticed them (like the ‘new’ VW logo with the line breaking the flow), they likewise look inferior. A few days ago I was at a store and noticed a woman’s product named ‘Febreze’ and recalled having seen it in a movie just the night before, on someone’s iPad (‘Pick me up Febreze’ it said in the movie), but spelled ‘Febreeze.’ (ME videos are ‘sure’ it used to be that way.) Marketing-wise, if you’re going to relate a feminine product with a ‘fresh breeze,’ you spell it out with the double-E. Otherwise it looks like an Italian name from the neighborhood: ‘Hey, Chichi Febreze! How ya doin’?’ Bad writing.
And a government document saying we have 52 states.
But what’s my point? This: We are apparently living in a branch of reality/universe that is deteriorating in quality — the ‘bad writing’ I cite is just an example of this. And it adds up. Brilliant directors allowing dumb ass lines into their work? Classic art that is subtly but noticeably inferior? I have yet to come across a ME that is an improvement. Not one. In theory, this is very bad news, like… I dunno… like a glitch in your EKG or a heart murmur.
I would also submit that I have demonstrated that it doesn’t matter if other people deny the changes. I mean, does it matter to you that most of your friends think you’re nuts because you don’t believe the WTCs could have totally disintegrated from damage near the top floors? In most cases the ME deniers are living in the same sort of doublethink world as my friend Walter, as evidenced in my old video. Or the dozen or so I document in Water Time. They choose to believe whatever makes them feel safe.
And of course what we don’t know is What else has changed? We have to assume that the pop culture examples are just the tip of a very deep and wide ‘berg. And it certainly is likely that changes in our personal lives — meaning changes that either no one else or very few others, would notice — are ongoing and may also be ‘negative.’
But hey, there’s one piece of good news I’ve come up with lately: Ironically, it might be a good thing if we’ve been hoodwinked on a massive scale about history, a la the ‘insertion’ of the Dark Ages. This would mean that ‘history’ is up to one thousand years shorter than we thought. Which means that the coming extinction event — which we are overdue for, since they occur every 12,000 years — may be delayed. (It’s only been 11,000 years, not 12,000, since the Younger Dryas Event that wiped out the megafauna. Hence the reprieve.)
The bad news linked to this good news (confused yet?) is that the planet may have to put up with that much more bullshit before the slate is wiped clean again. See how good/bad is relative?
And see how worthwhile this blog is?
Allan
Someone wanted a hint about what’s to come with Sam Harris. Harris is Christopher Hitchens’s replacement as a secular/intellectual mole for the PTB agenda. By ‘mole’ I mean a formal one. Harris is a state agent whose job it is to spread disinfo, i.e., to lie to us. He’s not just a useful idiot. Like Hitchens was, he’s a spook (with a handler and so forth), and knows perfectly well what he’s doing. My job is to provide the evidence.
57 comments for “There’s Good News at the End of This One!”