This one is also going to have to be brief. I’m almost out of this month’s hotspot cell phone data and once that goes I’ll have to wait until the 28th to use WordPress. Verizon just warned me I’m almost dry, which means I have about a half hour to get this out. Such is one of the downsides to road life.
I’m going to assume that you all have viewed at least one of the Scott Ritter links I and others have provided, regarding the Ukraine catastrophe. Great as he is, one thing Ritter mentions but sort of soft pedals is the possibility of a hot war between the U.S. (NATO) and Russia, and what that would likely lead to, i.e., the use of nukes, probably tactical at first.
As Ritter and a few others have said, right now is the most dangerous situation since the Cuban Missile Crisis, which came within a hair’s breadth of escalating to a nuclear holocaust. (Yes, I am assuming that nukes are real. Although I see this a 50-50 assumption, for our purposes I’ll assume the worst.)
The media is telling us that since Russia is losing the war, hence they are most likely to start a nuke exchange: The opposite is of course the case. It’s the West that is losing; my fear is that the media will continue on with this big lie in preparation for a false flag nuke event, which will then be blamed on Russia. As one of you pointed out (and as I’ve been saying), we are being lied to about EVERYTHING. So…. if someone uses a nuke over there, it will be NATO/the U.S., no matter what they say. And watch out for even heavier media hype on this subject — ‘Russia is getting desperate and blah blah.’ This will be the lead in to a false flag tactical nuke attack from the West. The best way to separate the big lie from the usual lie is how often it is repeated.
But I suspect most of you are ahead of me on this subject.
#
But given my interest and outrage over the vaccine issue (in general, not just re COVID), what I have really been thinking about is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., since viewing his nauseating exchange with Meghan Kelly.
Addendum: The most useful RfK, Jr. podcast is his debate with Alan Dershowitz (I can’t embed the link but it’s easily found). As good as it is, RFK pulls the same bullshit with Dershowitz, kissing the fucker’s ass about how open-minded he is and so on. Zero could be farther from the truth, as he (JFK) must know. He does the same with this mainstream human garbage.
I really want to like and trust RFK but if I truly am going to follow the evidence where it leads, I have to assume that the man is either a PTB mole or useful idiot. (Yes, there is a continuum here but in general it’s one or the other.)
For example, in Part One of the interview, after some meaningless crapola, and after not correcting Kelly when she claims that vaccines have saved millions of lives (there is no evidence that they have saved even one life, while killing and maiming millions), he claims to not be anti-vax. So we already know he’s either a fool or a liar. Since he is obviously not a fool, he is lying about this. Okay, we can assume this is so mainstream folks will listen to him, so it’s more of a white lie. Sorry, but it’s still a lie. You cannot have it both ways.
The real problem of course is that the premise of all he says is a lie — there is no evidence that ‘viruses’ cause disease — and if he doesn’t know it, again, he is a fool or a liar.
I scanned several hundred of this podcast’s comments and found it depressing that nearly every one was worshipful of this guy. Not a single one mentioned Doctors Cowan and Kaufman or The Invisible Rainbow. This tells us that people who listen to RFK, Jr. do not dig deeper for the truth. They figure if something is important, good old Bobby will tell them.
Addendum: here’s a beaut from Kelly. She quotes one of ‘her’ doctors (from Johns Hopkins, a classic PTB/big Pharma stronghold) in reply to RFK saying aluminum (which replaced mercury in vaccines) is also a neurotoxin; Kelly’s doctor claims we all take in more aluminum from what we eat (etc.) than is in vaccines. But holy shit, is there a difference between swallowing a poison and injecting it directly into the blood stream? Why doesn’t Bobby mention this?
I made a list of the issues Kennedy is silent about in this interview, although there were plenty of chances to bring them up. Since I have to keep this short, I’ll just name five:
No mention of the deaths due to the COVID vaccine. Kelly brought up the VAERS system, but then claimed that since it’s voluntary, it’s not meaningful. What a crock! What’s ‘not meaningful’ about it is that it under-reports the deaths/injuries by a factor of around 100, i.e., the 25,000 plus deaths listed is actually over two million.
Kennedy fails to mention the uselessness of the COVID PCR test. In their endless blabbing about Fauci and COVID, that this does not come up is borderline unbelievable.
Kelly claims that there is no evidence that mercury causes autism. RFK’s weak response to this was a tell that he cannot be trusted.
For all his talk about ‘science,’ RFK is silent about the fact that there is not one study that compares outcomes of those vaccinated (with any vaccine) with those who are not. This is the real crux of the vaccine matter.
RFK. when asked outright if the COVID pandemic is ‘real’ he answered in the affirmative, saying ‘millions have died from it.’ He says this in the face of the mountain of evidence that ‘the pandemic’ is a total fraud.
And again, this is just a short list. If Kennedy is not a limited hangout mole, he might as well be one.
Okay, I am out of cellular data and cannot even embed photos. I’ll try to get this piss poor post out; we’ll see if it works. My hotspot data system resets a week from today, so I’ll try to have a decent post done by then. And I’ll try to come up with more interesting subject matter. Maybe something less depressing.
Allan
41 comments for “WW3? RFK, Jr.?”