A good example of what’s going on.
Facebook automatically censored the link. It was already on their list of baaaaad links, although the information was all scientific studies. Peer reviewed.
I’ve been trying to wake up the few people back at Montauk I’m still in touch with. Hearing nothing back after sending them good information on this COVID operation, I emailed them about masks, then went to Facebook and tried to post the link I’d send my friends, a really important link; the best summation of masks that I’ve come across. (See the embed.) Facebook censored me, censored a summation of the science behind the wearing of face masks (of all kinds).
Face masks do not work and are harmful to your health.
Here’s the email and the link:
Ok, my Montauk friends don’t want to hear it; it’s complicated and upsetting to think we’re being lied to by the media/govt.
Simplify. Masks. They are telling us to wear them. But does this make scientific sense? 12 minutes:
If 12 minutes is too much time, just go to 10 minutes in and he’ll sum it up. If you don’t believe him, go back and look at his evidence. I’ve looked into this separately and he’s 100% right. Every study says the same thing: Masks don’t work and can make you sick.
So why is the state/media telling us to wear them?
This is why I almost never go near Facebook.
Allan
I just have one observation. The “first” time we “flattened the curve” here in America, masks were not widely mandated. Interesting.
The masks are doing exactly what they’re intended to, create a dichotomy, those who wear masks and those who don’t, to give us a camp to side with, and as a consequence, argue with the other side. Why else would Fauci come out and say don’t wear masks, they’re ineffective at the very beginning of this pandemic, when the virus was spreading like wildfire? Oh wait, he admitted he lied, so there wouldn’t be a shortage of PPE for hospitals. Okay, so now I trust him.
Where do you draw the line? If the science was settled on mask effectiveness before this pandemic (I hope the science hasn’t been settled in just the last five months because doctors and nurses have been wearing masks for a long time) then why would Fauci lie? If it’s true that Fauci lied so not to cause PPE shortage, then how do we know he’s not lying about other things? One way or another, we know Fauci isn’t above lying.
It’s hard not the think that this is not an agenda to push mandatory vaccinations on the public. Why else would the “official experts” be saying our only hope was to wait for a vaccine? What is the purpose of the virtual ban on treatments like hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc when they have proven to be effective on patients with COVID-19? What is the purpose of the censorship of America’s Frontline Doctor’s press conference from major social media networks? What is reason behind all of this if not for the purpose of pushing mandatory vaccinations on the population of the world?
For the record, I don’t believe TPTB have done a sufficient job of pushing their worldwide vaccination program ( https://www.who.int/topics/immunization/en/ ) this time around, but I still don’t think that’s the point we should be focusing on. I noticed a meme the other day that said something like, “I don’t want to alarm anyone, but Mad Max took place in 2021”. What if the world goes to “hell in a hand-basket” not because of an uncontrollable pandemic, but because everyone on the planet turns against each other?
Darren,
Yes, in part, the intention is to create division between wearers and non. They are forever working to create the world of the excluding dichotomy. What’s excluded is anything presuming to be outside the two-side. The left side or the right, are defined not by principle, but by supposedly different political systems. None of the participants in the false political spectrum can tell us by what principle anarchy is placed on the extreme left. It’s only by convention that it is placed there. The idea of mankind functioning with no government other than by conscience is absolutely anathema to the ruling paradigm. With the latest in violent demonstrations, the black cloth agents provocateur are there to demonstrate that anarchy is evil. What I find so disturbing is the scale of how many lap up the charade without question.
The so called bicameral or two party political domain gives lip service to the emergence of a viable third party, but functionally exclude the possibility. Mask wearing is a highly visible exhibition of the current status of mass global obedience.
The fact that they can influence massive mask wearing is the point, and because it gives a noticeable, public compliance signal to others, it has the appearance of being legal and legitimate, no matter what political model it functions under.
Well stated METATOAST To put it in lay man’s terms: You can not blame the flies that swarm to a rotting corpse for killing the animal. They are there only to ‘take away’ cellular debris. Likewise viral material can not be blamed for the storm that is taking place inside a human body. Viruses are there to serve a purpose, to clean up the garbage left behind from a minor to major detoxification taking place. You will test positive because either a clean up is in the process or it has occurred in the past.
–
Pardon me, but doesn’t he espouse a philosophy that the deaths are caused by pollution and the environment of the location? Wouldn’t that include blaming the flies? BTW sometimes swarming flies actually do kill the animal.
And I don’t understand your analogy. That’s not how things work in real life. Am I supposed to just take your word for such a ridiculous claim?
Metatoast was talking about viral spores which is a Star Wars thing, not a real thing. He clearly doesn’t understand what a virus is. Reality is not just something you get to make up.
This guy “Chris” has to go. He just doesn’t get it and won’t. “Taking your word for ridiculous claims” and “reality is not something you just get to make up” is exactly what he does with every bit of “knowledge” he espouses…..”Chris” is often just repeating what he has been taught, but he shows no critical thinking skills…..I don’t think he is here to educate those of us who need to learn different, interesting, and logical perspectives , I think he is here to derail thought advancement
“… viral material can not be blamed for the storm that is taking place inside a human body. Viruses are there to serve a purpose, to clean up the garbage left behind from a minor to major detoxification taking place. You will test positive because either a clean up is in the process or it has occurred in the past.”
Yeah, I don’t get it. It is new age hippie almost Scientology-esque word salad. Testing positive (for COVID-19) means that they found signature strands of rna that only could have come from COVID-19, not because of “detoxification cleanups.”
Sometimes they refer to a positive antibodies test as testing positive for COVID-19, although it just shows past exposure to it.
Critical thinking skills involve analyzing known proveable facts (hopefully what most people have been taught.) I don’t see any facts to analyze in what Metatoast or Kate said.
I’ll be quiet now.
Yes, be quiet now. If you can’t debunk the info in the post link with science, I.e., scientific studies, shut the fuck up.
You want me to debunk intentionally divisive and misleading Russian propaganda? You do know what “RT” is, right? Yes, you are promoting science-deficient Russian propaganda. [RT is not controlled by the PTB so it is free to quote legitimate, peer-reviewed studies. I’ve asked you to quote the SCIENCE behind your blabbing and you have not, because you cannot. You’ve had enough space on my blog. I don’t have the time to point out that everything you write is bullshit. I have to assume you are are a paid troll. Go away.]
…And it’s like he is stuck inside watching TV & on the net , and never venturing outside in the real world to have a look around out there & investigate with his own eyes, and talk to people.
I reckon he is on the bottle (drinking) while he does a lot of his posts too….& running to dr google to “fact check” every 5 minutes.
What gets me is he reads all of Allan’s blog, and forgets everything, or hardly believes a word Allan says at all.
Chris and others,
I appreciate any response, in agreement or otherwise.
Kate Habke, you’re welcome. Good to hear from you.
Chris, I think perhaps you are young and school educated and have not yet proceeded to the self-educational, de-schooling phase of your life.
Gadflies can’t be recognized if they have no bite. I sense a sort of desperation in your comments; it’s the kind that comes from those niggling memes that would challenge anyone’s sense of a majority classed reality, and you are a case example of someone in turmoil over it’s crumbling paradigm; one that is crumbling because it is fixed and ridged, having insufficient resiliency to cope with an encroaching invasion of truth; not allowing for the kind of self reflection and independent study that makes advancement possible. Yet, you are here and tolerated for a reason. You have a knack for respectful insolence, refraining usually from outright and vulgar ad hominems. However, you are most always wrong in this venue; and that makes for an ideal practice situation for those who are working on a psyop of their own; to imaginatively penetrate beyond the appearance of formidable ramparts, made by those that have accepted the prefabricated excuses, as in the particular case of dishonorable compliance signaling. AKA, wearing the Mask.
Success in efforts to thwart the psyop with a counter-psyop does not depend on convincing the majority. A relatively small contingent of independent and determined activists can cause huge waves of popular reconsideration.
None of that “science” had to do with COVID-19. Putting that very large problem aside, some of the research merely proved that medical masks were just as effective as n95 masks. Not that they don’t work.
This person not only misrepresented most of the studies, but kept intermixing personal opinion and misunderstandings of the conclusions. He is taking all studies he finds on the internet as being equally valid and true, regardless of peer reviews or professional consensus, and then picking and choosing only ones that support his thesis… That isn’t science, that is a slick, poorly informed infomercial for stupidity that is about as objective and full of facts as a Trump rally. Quit equating all viruses. HIV does not equal the flu does not equal Covid-19. They can have varying levels and methods of transmissibility, even within influenzas. If you don’t wear a mask in the middle of a pandemic, people will treat you like you are a selfish asshole, because if the shoe fits… Don’t be a “Karen.” The way people are overreacting, you’d think they were making them wear a straightjacket.
If you REALLY look at the research, the vast majority of it, by far, says that YOU wearing masks helps to prevent YOU from infecting others, and that wearing cloth masks isn’t bad for you at all. With so many asymptomatic cases running around, a mask requirement seems reasonable. If you were getting major surgery, wouldn’t you want everyone in the surgery room wearing masks? Why? And why do they wear them?
Watching YouTube videos is not scientific research. Making a video also doesn’t make you an expert. Look at the completely debunked “Plandemic.”
(welcome back Allan, glad things are ok.)
Your statement “ merely proved that medical masks were just as effective as n95 masks” is ALSO nit the point/conclusion of the studies . I read them to say “n95 were no more effective than surgical masks”
As in both were effective at preventing spread to other people. N95 masks are to keep the wearer safe as well as preventing spread from the wearer. Surgical masks are for preventing infection FROM the wearer.
Cloth masks are not for preventing you from catching COVID-19. It only takes one asymptomatic jackass running around with no mask to infect a bunch of people wearing masks. The masks probably help a little with preventing you from breathing aerosolized (tiny droplets) COVID-19, but mostly keeps you from producing aerosolized COVID-19 when sneezing, talking, singing or even yelling about how you shouldn’t have to wear a mask because you don’t believe in science.
While it may be cathartic to label people assholes and jackasses, I would suggest that there is a separate, fundamental reason why some people arent wearing masks…
They simply don’t feel scared enough to.
I’m not arguing that they should or shouldn’t be scared…just that they dont.
Even the biggest asshole or jackass in the world wants to save his own ass.
Watching the news, engaging in social media, reading scientific papers and/or projections, won’t be trumped by people’s own interactions and observations from their environment/community.
If a pandemic that leads to a national(worldwide) emergency that results in the threat of imminent death goes on for 6 months, but a hypothetical jackass doesnt know anyone who is sick, let alone died…and no one in his family or circle of friends knows anyone…and no one at his place of employment knows anyone…well, eventually that jackass will start feeling safe from imminent death himself.
If and when people start knowing actual people who are dying…dont worry, they won’t need to be told by the news or doctors or scientists, or well-meaning internet forum commenters, to wear a mask.
They’ll damn well stay at home and not risk their life by going out, even with a mask.
People want to live. Smart, stupid, conservative, Democrat…
The whole reason we are even in a position of being able to argue about masks, is that it is not clear to many people that they are needed.
That’s because those people are not seeing any actual illness in anyone in their community.
Sorry for the typos…meant “will he trumped”…
I’m sure you get my point, tho.
(I shouldnt use my phone to comment, I suppose.)
Yes, the only redeeming feature of this covid con, is there has been less people with colds around the bazaars (and no coughing! :-D).
My friend who works in a hospital, overheard some surgeons talking about “covid19”, with one asking another “if he will wear a mask when he is out and about?” , and the agreed answer was > “what is the point?” …ie NO.
“MISERY LOVES COMPANY” is one of the true and still relevant sayings, and the scaredy cat mask wearers want everyone to share in their pathetic misery.
If they kill their TV, they will kill the “deadly disease”.
Dang it, that is a good point. Ignorance doesn’t make one an asshole, unless it is intentional. I guess I get carried away taking care of a high risk 83 year old. But, I mean, the people intentionally going into businesses with no mask, then yelling, spewing tiny droplets everywhere… They are assholes.
What about the cold or flu germs on the HANDS Mr??…which is probably the main way ills & chills are spread . Hey lets destroy everything because a few people have a cold or flu (seasonal).
The uselessness of masks > https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.full
Hey Chris, a lot of blabbing but no links to SCIENCE refuting that masks do more harm than good. Surely you can find 5 studies to back up your claims.if you can’t find them, consider apologizing for repeating the PTB propaganda.
There is no science showing masks do more harm than good. That is the current consensus by far. If you disagree with that, you have to prove it wrong, not the other way around (and not to me, but the scientific community). If you think the consensus is that masks are harmful, I wonder where you get your information from. Where is the multiple studies confirming the results of studies with outlying results? I am merely following the scientific method. What most people already believe is what needs to be proven wrong. You are claiming it is propaganda, and not true. I am confused as to why I have to apologize for stating the scientific consensus. Water is wet, grass is green, ice is cold, humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor, the earth is round, and there is a dangerous pandemic that the transmission of which can be reduced dramatically by everyone wearing masks, which most people agree don’t cause problems. Obviously you are not one of those people. You haven’t apologized for your promotion of the completely debunked movie plandemic which actually was propaganda.
Please tell us about the “common ancestor”….
I will tell you about our people held hostage with your “dangerous pandemic”….they escape quarantine at the first 1/2 chance they get and go galavanting around town shopping etc!.
And grass isn’t always green, water doesn’t always feel wet etc.
Turn off your lying hound TV news box!!.
How stupid or dishonest are you? the other folks here viewed the link in the post and are aware that you are either dishonest or a moron.
While masks may not be effective, they do serve as a reminder to stay the hell away from each other. Viruses need human proximity to propagate.
Wow. What an incredible comment. I’m pretty much speechless. In a way thanks for proving my point.
Your research and efforts to educate us are always appreciated!
Thanks, Allan. 🙂
Thank you, Allan! Here’s all you need to know about FacistBook: they banned the term #SaveTheChildren to protect the global pedophilia and human trafficking network that OWNS them: https://nypost.com/2020/08/06/why-savethechildren-was-temporarily-banned-from-facebook/
I want to choke the shit out zuckerburg …that little communist rat
Try and savor the irony. Facebook is defending the de-facement of their very brand. No, bad taste it is.
So, continuing from Kentucky Covid: If the definition of contagion is not limited to pathogenic infectivity, and if the normative response to the need for diagnosis, miraculously subsides as an automatic search for a virus, then, perhaps, we may proceed to theories more compelling.
Arsenic, if sprayed over a city, may kill those who breathe it in, and if we don’t know that it’s arsenic, and since all those affected where in close mutual proximity, we may inappropriately ascribe the cause to a contagion. This would get us back to the original meaning of virus, as poison. Many who are brain-locked on viral theory, will insist that a virus must be the cause. Others will argue that “viruses”, swept into the general category of pathogens, will some how be exempt from questions about their existence. With brain-locked belief, conditioned by the one-disease-one-cause meme, no exploration will proceed in the full range of possible causative agents, including that of psychosomatic disease induction, or like something employed in a science fiction novel, other than those centered around, u-know, a virus.
We have discussed here the likelihood of technology being, apart from us commoners, perhaps decades ahead of what we know and utilize. Who’s to say that biotech, like a secret space program, is not also running black, and is divorced from the dominant paradigm of retarded medical science; with a highly developed nomenclature that would mystify the researchers that are so difficult to escape? And who’s to say that going however far back in historical time, we will ever arrive when this advanced secret technology, by enemies, alien or otherwise, is not in play? Historical time has no certain references for existent tech, even as advanced as nanotech; which is, I guess, the foundation for the kind of bioweapons that those billions of dollars were spent on.
Once again, the singular viral cause, is a meme that must elide over every instance of pollution as a co-factor. However, the proponents of the singular viral cause may admit to co-factoring in passing. So, what some of are trying to do, is arrest that passage and reinsert environmental destruction as at least approaching co-equality in importance with the misguided respect that is massively held for virology. Having said that, I find it impressive that some are credibly claiming that viruses are a case of mistaken identity, meaning that, as depicted in medical science, do not exist. What are named viruses is a particular phase of pleomorphic, shape-shifting behavior of starving bacteria that survive by means similar to fungal spore-making. What were once called macrophages or bacteria-eaters are exactly these spore like entities; and I think it’s just another case where objects in proximity to destructive events are mistaken for cause; for these “spores” are found at the same time and place where the bacteria appear to be dying off. When environmental conditions improve, the bacteria reappear, and the phages or “viruses” disappear. One exchanges into the other, either way depending on conditions, and the misinterpretation consists of thinking that there is some infective quality to what is observed, because phages appear at the same time as bacteria seem to die. A war is thought to exist where none is.
It’s really the need to refute bogus virology that’s importantly at stake; and at a different stake; freedom and the means to achieve happiness, the real target of Covert-19.
“The Emperor has no clothes – and all the power grabs and emergency decrees are based on lies. We are not looking at 1 virus, 1 cause and 1 disease; we are looking a cluster of diseases and a variety of causes, hidden by the COVID-19 umbrella term to fuel the fake pandemic narrative.” Makia Freeman
None of this means that there is no such thing as contagion. But in lieu of a comprehensive list of environmental conditions, how are we to know with certainty, the possible convergence of factors that explain something like smallpox?
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Metatoast, thank you for providing the link to “Dismantling The Virus Theory” PDF
Kickass commentary And well stated
Virus vs bacteria:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/virus-vs-bacteria-difference
Viruses are not “starving bacteria.” And a fungus is neither a virus, nor bacteria. It’s not that hard.
“Testing positive (for COVID-19) means that they found signature strands of rna that only could have come from COVID-19, not because of “detoxification cleanups.””
Testing positive via what method Chris? And according to you, can you describe the fundamental nature and function of virus (the thousands upon thousands of examples of what we call viruses that are in and around you at all times)?
Endorsing the “consensus” view is certainly no indicator of critical thought. Personally I tend to side with discounting the statements of known liars, shills and paid agents. So if the consensus of the political class of stooges known as Governors, Senators, Presidents, Pharama execs, “Public Health” bureaucrats, and tech billionaires, mindless celebrities are all singing the praises of masks, social distancing etc…that is a consensus I want no part of…
And if a so-called virus is far, far smaller than almost any bacteria (according to the “experts” the corona virus is about .1 to .125 micron, and N95’s are 95% effective at filtering particles .3 microns and above), and masks are so gosh-darn effective, why aren’t masks mandated 24/7 by everyone in every hospital on earth? Bam…there goes all the hospital born super bugs for pennies a person! There you go…where’s my Nobel prize?
Thanks Logan. Research also shows mask wearing in surgical settings may not be effective as once believed and could make infections worse. See Fetzer’s article https://jamesfetzer.org/2020/08/studies-of-surgical-masks-efficacy-masks-are-useless-in-preventing-the-spread-of-disease/
So far, I’ve read half the research articles (if available) and abstracts that are present in the article and all, so far, check-out. I’ll be finish the rest shortly.