How Things Would Work (even with The Bible)

“I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I’ll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it…  Isaac Asimov

I’m not sure why I’m doing this, given that so few people seem able or willing to actually think critically about this (or anything). ‘Evidence’ has nothing to do with what 99% of what people believe. And as I first showed in Water Time, no one ever changes his/her mind about anything. So why do I bother? I hardly break even on this blog; I don’t monetize anything.  

I guess I’m doing this as a way to think out loud. Yes, that must be it.

I’ll try to make clear (to myself) what I mean by ‘how things would work.’ Note: For newbies, this post refers to my video found here.

NWO Reporter wrote:

As far as actors saying the ‘wrong’ thing…they are actors. They say what they’re paid to say. Maybe their job was covert promotion of the ME. There’s nothing supernatural about actors saying anything.

Okay, let’s say the actors in The Newsroom scene were just told to say ‘in the City’, i.e., it was in the script, and Sorkin was aware of the psy op (this is completely plausible, as I’ve said about Sorkin being a puppet of the PTB). Now we have to ask Who else in the show knew/knows about the psy op? Could it be only Sorkin and maybe a confidant or two? Yes, possible, which would mean that several people who read the script likely mentioned the ‘mistake’ and he said, ‘Don’t worry about it. Just do it my way.’ Possible, sure.

What happens here — and please think about this as a way of looking at these things — is that we have to think about how this went from the get-go. I can tell you one thing about Sorkin: no one told him to stick in a whole subplot about Sex in/and the City’ in the HIS show. (Right: Not IMPOSSIBLE. Just very very unlikely.) It is possible that Sorkin came up with the idea himself — via the spooks, word to the ‘in crowd’ was that they want to fuck with us with the title of that show — he’s known about this for years, maybe — and he did it on his own, or maybe got it okayed from the spooks. (At this level, the bus-prop becomes unimportant.)

So that would pretty much explain this one show. People think along these lines and go, ‘See, that explains this ME bullshit.’ This is what I mean by cherry-picking. They figure ALL the examples of people saying ‘in the city’ can be explained this way. This is shallow thinking and this particular show is a good example of why, since there are so many ‘residuals’, i.e., other people getting it ‘wrong’, people who are reading their own scripts (the awards shows) and doing so over the years.

But is it POSSIBLE that the awards announcers and so forth were likewise told to read it that way, with no explanation as to why? Very unlikely, but possible. (Maybe the script did read ‘Sex ‘n the City’.)

But the capper is the fact that literally everyone involved with the show ‘Sex in/and the City’ would have to be completely in on it, and sworn to secrecy. I’m talking everyone, from the stars to the gaffers to the Teamsters who drive the stars to the carpenters and so on and so forth. Do I really have to explain why this is the case? I hope not. (From the comments it’s obvious that I should explain this but since it would do no good anyway I’ll not bother.)

In this case we have a conspiracy that would get out, and pretty quickly. By now there’d be Youtubers figuring to go viral with an exec producer or whatever (maybe someone with a grudge), etc. etc. blowing the whistle. Everyone see that? (Doesn’t matter: No one changes their mind about anything. Ever. This is the problem with our species.)

And here’s the thing. If you are going this route you pretty much have to agree that the other major MEs, like in Star Wars and Forrest Gump (ones with evidence), say, are also real (part of the op), so you have to allow that everyone on those productions are in on it. (The spooks figure correctly that people will ‘run away’ with this, ‘seeing’ MEs everywhere, which is great. But they would do ones like Gump and, especially, Star Wars and the Luke’s father line, to get the op rolling.

So wouldn’t it get out? Almost certainly. I say ‘almost’ because it’s not against the laws of physics that everyone would keep silent. Hey, look at all the crisis actors that have participated in stuff like the Boston bombing and other false flag terrorism. None of them have come forward (there may be exceptions here). Good point, right? No, that’s a bit different, since crisis actors are carefully screened and read the riot act about what happens to them if they talk. You can’t do that with showbiz people who are already successful.

But there is a show stopper. I haven’t done this myself so this is second hand, but what about all the VHS tapes (etc) with the true, original ‘Luke, I am your father’ on them? To go this route we’d have to agree with ‘Miles Mathis’ (yes, that psy op) that the spooks are sneaking into houses and yard sales surreptitiously replacing old tapes with doctored ones. I say this because not one YT vid has come out with an example of Vader saying ‘Luke, I am your father’. (An even better example maybe is the ‘Dolly’s Braces’ one from Moonraker. That one has whole websites devoted to it.)

So that’s that with all of the above. We have to rule out a run of the mill spook psy op (with no ‘high strangeness’) — which I hate to do, believe me. If we wanna pooh-pooh the ME then we’re back to bad memories by millions of people (including me). Then we have to explain the ‘residuals’ that cannot be denied – which is why I chose Sex in/and the City; it has so many, and they span several years. (Ditto Mister Rogers, with all the skits.)

The other reason the ME cannot be a psy op is indirect but robust: The media/alt media doesn’t go near it. (If there are exceptions, help me out.) Look at the YT references to it. They are all small timers/individuals like me. (Keep in mind that the alt media – the slick/successful ones, are virtually all state moles/psy ops/Limited hangouts.) See, if, in spite of everything I’ve explained here, the ME is a psy op, it has to be a huge one, with major resources devoted to keeping it a secret and so forth. So why keep it so low key? Hey, why not do a 60 Minutes/whatever, and make fun of it but in a way that gets attention? If this were a psy op, that’s what they’d do. But they haven’t.

So what’s going on here? I don’t know but I’ll make an educated guess. Here it is: The ME was a psy op, but it got out of control and so had to be cancelled. Why do I say that?

Yes, as many of you (who don’t think it through) have said, the PTB want to get us to distrust our own senses, so they came up with the ME, a regular psy op, using the Net the way they always do…. Wait… that can’t be, as I have shown. No, the psy op was using the Net plus whatever they have unearthed at CERN or with quantum computing. (Do your own research, maybe starting with ‘CERN + the occult’.)

And I have news: We can’t in point of fact trust our own senses. The PTB forgot that they too are ‘human,’ and subject to the same effects as the rest of us.

Addendum: When I say we can’t trust our own senses, do any of you doubt me on this? Hah! I can hear the moronic yelling over the howling onshore wind here at the beach, right now. You think I’m nuts for saying this? If so, you are a joke, the joke. One example: Lately, you’ve watched rockets back down from space and land on a rolling barge at sea and accepted that this really happened. Others have seen two rockets do the same onto land, simultaneously. I have heard from people who say they were there when this happened, as proof that it did happen. 

What a joke!

I have ceased to disbelief in the powers of the occult; I’m agnostic on the subject. That there is Evil in this world and that it has begun to run amok with ‘reality’ as we seem to experience it, appears to be the case. (If you need proof, read the comments from my last post: Stupidity equaling evil after a certain point.) I believe that the PTB, the human/flesh beings who figure they are in control have somehow gone too far (a sort of modern Tower of Babel) and can no longer control whatever they have unleashed.

So what started as a psy op is now… something else. Something to worry about. That’s my educated guess.

#

The Bible. I mention the Bible and the shit flies, doesn’t matter that I explain I don’t believe it was ‘divinely inspired’ or not, and I’m only interested in evidence. I get shit from people who just need to vent their stupidity, one way or the other, and I seem to be a good target. I don’t care. (Some moron who calls himself ‘drud’ makes a complete fool of himself claiming I’m a Christian, then rambling on. Doesn’t matter what I say. Another insists I’m a Jew (as if that would mean something), ‘Goat’-something is his handle. I’m starting to think these people can’t be that stupid — they have to be paid to write their crapola. Good to know I need discrediting.)

Having made that ‘clear’ (as if I’ve done anything of the sort): It does not matter whether or not what you believe about the Christian Bible. The PTB are practising occultists and take the Bible very seriously, as they do the Christian doctrines behind it, and, indeed, all religions. Now, my educated guess coupled with this occult-observation implies that the Bible itself, and discrediting it, would be of great interest to these ‘people,’ given their satanic proclivities.

Therefore, this Mandela Effect – this black op that maybe has gotten out of control – should manifest itself in the Bible. And indeed, it appears so. ‘The lion’ used to ‘lie with the lamb’; now it does not. How am I sure of this, aside from my own memory? (Please look carefully at the inserted screen grabs from here on. They are important. I mean if you’re not a moron.)

With the miracle of the Net, one thing we can do is see what other people are ‘searching’ for, via the feature called ‘Google Trends.’ With a little rational thought, you can get a pretty good picture of what people believe over time.

According to many who have studied the Bible (nuts/fanatics though they may be), ‘the lion laying with the lamb’ was/is/should be in the Book of Isaiah, Chapter 11, verse 6. When we go there now, we get ‘The wolf shall also dwell with the lamb,’ okay? (I’m reading this from a hard copy KJV I found at a rest stop.)

Correct or not, be it wolf or lion, Isaiah 11:6 is a well-known passage. So what I did was put in a search on Google Trends to see how many people have looked for the wolf version. Guess what? ‘No data’ comes up. This means that, basically, no one has had any interest in the wolf passage. None whatsoever. And I tried all kinds of combinations of ‘dwelling with’ or ‘lying with’ or ‘shall lie with’ or ‘also shall’ and on and on with bible-lingo, in case the Thumpers out there just got a word wrong or something when they did their search. Nope. No one in the goddamn world had done a search for it. (I’m showing you the ‘United States’ results but the same ‘No data’ comes up in a Worldwide search.)

So I tried ‘The lion shall lay with the lamb’ and guess what? A bunch of folks had done searches for that. And I did variations as I did with the wolf version and even more folks came up (so we have to add the numbers in the different phrasings). Any combination of ‘lion laying or lying or dwelling’ and so forth told me that still more people had done searches.

And yet the passage now does not exist! (Not in the KJV and not in any of the scores of other translations.)

With all my Google Trend searches I mainly paid attention to the years before 2010, which was about when ‘The Mandela Effect’ first reared its nasty-named head. That way the results weren’t skewed by the Effect itself.

What the Lion/Wolf issue implies is pretty important, though, if you think about it. Although the Trends don’t go back before 2004, that no one between 2004 and today tried to find the wolf-version of the passage means that this ‘change’ is very recent. I mean, right? Every KJV Bible on the planet now says the wolf sacked out with the lamb; if that were the case since 2004 surely someone would have done a search by now, the clear implication being that the change is very recent, within the last couple years at most.

Does anyone see what I mean or are you too busy making up bullshit to think about what I’m showing you?

 

Allan

Any comments, be they dumb-ass or well-thought out, should start by explaining these screen grabs. How it would really have to work for them to be as they are. Implications (what they mean) are welcome. This is my interest.

Added Note: I thought to check the Youtube video dates that mention ‘Mandela Effect + lion/wolf’ and it was no surprise that the oldest one was from ‘2 years ago,’ which is further evidence that the change took place about then (2016).

I do keep forgetting how lacking critical thought most people are so let me repeat the obvious:  Statistically, no one has done any Google searches for a Bible passage involving a wolf and a lamb from 2004 to the present. If such a passage existed in the Bible for all those years (a dozen years) people (statistically speaking) would have done searches — if you plug any ‘important’ Bible passages in to Google Trends you get results. This means that the wolf/lamb version was somehow added, around 2016, and it was added to already-existing Bibles. Strange, yes, but that is what this evidence implies. 

If you have a rational explanation for why the above is incorrect, I am all ears.