Addendum (August 24): Don’t read this now. The article it was taken from has been deleted from their website. Here’s the note from the author:
by Colleen Huber, NMD
8/15/20 update from Dr. Huber:
“Unfortunately, I have to remove this [the article] paper for now.
Some diligent and astute researchers who read my paper have now directed me to data and pages on the CDC website that I had not previously seen, which will likely adjust numbers that I published.
My paper may have to be revised, and my revised paper will appear here when ready. Please know that many researchers are sorting through the data now, and will possibly post their information before mine is figured out. Thank you for your patience and continued interest in this topic.”
Visit for the original link and updated article when posted: https://www.primarydoctor.org/is-there-a-pandemic
So check tomorrow or later for more. The veracity of this article is important, for a couple reasons at least.
The following is an analysis by greenmedinfo.com and is the best ‘Proof of Fraud’ re the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ that I’ve come across. These numbers do not lie (I’ve put in bold the the bullet points):
From CDC data, 2020 has the lowest weekly death rate in a decade – so far
Although some of this lower death rate may be due to reporting lag, that lag is likely too small to explain the lower weekly death rate in 2020 than in previous years.
Abstract
A pandemic that commands the attention of the public, and action by the medical field, is one that sickens many people, overwhelms healthcare resources, and raises the total death rate above that of a typical year or season. The COVID-19 era that began in early 2020 has received much attention in the United States for deaths that have occurred during this time. Has COVID-19 resulted in more deaths (known as “excess deaths”) than would have happened in a typical year? An obstacle to answering that question is that testing for COVID-19 is flawed from being both inaccurate and imprecise, for reasons discussed herein, and it is difficult to distinguish COVID-19 from other respiratory illnesses, due to symptoms and signs that are mostly indistinguishable from the common cold, flu or pneumonia. It is possible that flu and pneumonia deaths, and perhaps others, have been ascribed to COVID-19, especially due to peculiarities in mortality reporting discussed below.
Therefore, year-over-year comparison of deaths from all causes is likely the best analysis of available evidence of whether the United States is now confronted by a deadly pandemic.
However, only 32 weeks have elapsed in 2020. For each previous year, 52 weeks have already elapsed. How then can we compare deaths from all causes in 2020 to previous years? In this paper, I divide total deaths by number of weeks to arrive at number of deaths per week for each of the last 21 years, January 1, 2000 through August 8, 2020.
The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) lists total deaths for many previous years. The CDC also provides number of deaths from all causes in 2020. On examination of the data for the first two decades of the 21st century in this paper, it is seen that the 2020 weekly total death rate in the US is the lowest in a decade, and second lowest in the 21st century so far.
Background
A pandemic is the prevalent spread of a disease over an entire country or worldwide, and there is often increased mortality for its duration compared to more typical years. Early rises in death rate are a warning of an especially dangerous pandemic. In 2020, it has been widely assumed that COVID-19 is a pandemic.
Understanding the COVID-19 phenomenon has been obstructed by several factors.
COVID-19 is assumed to be caused by a coronavirus that is said to be novel, “SARS-CoV-2.” However, SARS is likely a misnomer, because SARS is the acronym for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. It is not at all clear that a majority of COVID-19 positive individuals have had acute respiratory distress with this illness. Other factors, such as use of over-pressurized ventilators, have led to acute respiratory distress among those diagnosed with COVID-19.
The most confusing aspect of COVID-19 is reliance on a reverse transcriptase, polymerase chain reaction manufacturing technique (RT-PCR), now nearly universally re-purposed as a test for the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, although there are many problems with this test. I outline these problems below:
- The very questionable applicability of the RT-PCR manufacturing technique for propagating RNA, now used throughout the world as a presumed test for presence of the particular infectious agent in question, or of other coronaviruses, other virions and virus particles that may resemble the SARS-CoV-2 infectious agent without distinction among those; and
- The 80% false positive rate of nucleic acid testing in the diagnosis of COVID-19; (1) and
- The arbitrary number of iterations of this test that must be selected to produce a positive result; and
- Instructions given to physicians by the CDC to code cases as COVID-19 deaths including presumptively; (2) and
- Controversy regarding higher Medicare and private insurance reimbursement for COVID-19 patients than for flu patients, (3) (4) which may have skewed reported cause of death on death certificates; and
- Financial rewards to hospitals by the CARES Act for the number of COVID-19 patients they treat; and
- Direct financial incentives to patients for positive COVID-19 test results; (5) and
- The possibility that there may be political influences in altering the true number of deaths from COVID-19. [Ya think???]
Therefore, in order to attain the truest picture of the impact of the COVID-19 on public health, it may be helpful to look at deaths from all causes, to see if there was a significant change. Lack of a significant change in those numbers implies lack of lethality from any new cause.
Methods
As of this writing, 32 weeks have elapsed in 2020. However, for each previous year, 52 weeks have already elapsed. How then can we compare deaths from all causes in 2020 to previous years?
I divided the total number of deaths for each year by the number of weeks. That is 52 weeks for all years, except for 2020, in which 32 weeks have elapsed as of this past Saturday, August 8, 2020, which is the most recently updated week in the CDC data cited. This gives us the average number of deaths per week for each of those years, and allows a meaningful comparison between 2020 and prior years.
CDC data provides deaths from all causes for all previous years in the 21st century. (6) (7) The CDC also provides data for all-cause deaths in 2020. (8)
Results
Table 1
Table 1
Column D of Table 1 shows the total deaths divided by the number of weeks in the year to obtain an average number of deaths for each week in that particular year. That is calculated for all 21 years (2000 through 2020). 32 weeks for 2020 is highlighted to draw attention to that difference from the other years.
It is important to factor in the growing US population over the last two decades. The US population for each year is given in Column E.
Column G shows the ratio of total weekly deaths per US population for each of the first 21 years of the 21st century.
A comparison of the percentages in Column G are best seen in Graph 1 below.
Graph 1
Graph 1
We can see in Graph 1 that all-cause deaths per week in the US population seem to fluctuate between 0.015% and 0.017% of the population throughout the first two decades of this century. However, we see for all of the 21 years, 2020 has the second lowest weekly deaths of any year as a percentage of the total population. In Table 1 of this paper, Column H shows the rank of each year of the last two decades regarding its mortality. Only 2009 had lower mortality. All other years have had higher weekly death rates, as a percentage of population, than 2020. This second lowest death rate, in 2020, compared to previous years, may reflect lag time in reporting of mortality data to the CDC. However, if that is the case, it is likely not attributable to COVID-19 because the CDC has consistently reported for over three months that COVID-19 deaths peaked the week of April 18, 2020 in the US, and have been on a steady decline ever since. That is illustrated in CDC’s Table 1, which is updated each weekday at this link (8) and with screenprint from August 10, 2020 (the first weekday after and reflecting the 32nd week of 2020) below endnote (8).
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/
Also, at the same link, the CDC estimates that at least 75% of all deaths have been reported and tallied within eight weeks. Therefore, there is likely little difference from the currently displayed numbers, and the numbers that will ultimately be displayed. Any adjustment to these numbers is unlikely to change the trajectory of the curve in Graph 1 from its current sharp downward direction, toward an upward surge and a peak in 2020, which would give evidence of a pandemic if that were the case.
We have an opportunity to compare the first 32 weeks of 2019 with the same period in 2020, using the following monthly breakdown of 2019 in Table 2. When considering only the first 32 weeks of 2019 (as we have so far of 2020), we see that the total deaths per week as a percent of 2019 population is still higher than the comparable 32-week time period of 2020. This data shown below is reported by the CDC (9), and is from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
Table 2
Table 2 shows deaths for each month in 2019. If we consider January through July 2019, plus the first 8 days in August 2019 (derived from the whole month of August / 31 * 8), then we see that total deaths through the first 32 weeks of 2019 were 1,730,581. This averaged 54,081 deaths per week. As a percentage of the 2019 US population (329,064,917), the total weekly death rate in 2019 was 0.016435%, which was still higher than for the first 32 weeks of 2020, which was 0.015358%. It was 7% higher in 2019 than in 2020.
One might wonder if the 32 weeks of 2020 have been truly representative of what the entire year will be. According to this CDC graph, (10) it seems as if the early months of a year are generally more deadly than later in a year. January through May seem to contain a disproportionate number of deaths in a year compared to June through December.
Therefore, let’s consider CDC mortality data January through May 2020. On May 29, 2020, the last weekday in May, the CDC reported total deaths of 984,553 (11) to date in the US. This was at nearly the end of week 22. Dividing, we find 44,752 deaths per week. Dividing that number in turn by the 2020 US population, we have 44,752 / 331,208,757. The result is 0.01351% of Americans died per week in those first 5 months of 2020. This percentage is even lower than the weekly death rate computed using data through August 8, 2020, and it is still lower than the weekly death rate for any of the prior years in the 21st century, bar none. [This is as close to ‘Proof of Fraud’ as you can get!]
Discussion
If COVID-19 is genuinely the deadly pandemic that it is widely thought to be, then total deaths would not only be a little higher than usual, but would be much greater during the period of its peak incidence and closely following weeks. It is not possible to have a deadly pandemic rage through a population without increasing the total number of all-cause deaths during the year of its peak incidence, because there is no reason for alternate causes of death, (heart disease, cancer, etc) to simultaneously decline. Therefore, if deaths are not significantly increased above previous years for a given region, then there has been no pandemic, nor even an epidemic there.
On the contrary, what has been found is that so far there are fewer deaths per week in 2020, than in any other year since 2009. Although some of this lower death rate may be due to reporting lag, that lag is likely too small to explain the considerably lower weekly death rate in 2020 than in previous years.
It seems that there is no pandemic in 2020 of COVID-19 or of anything else, at least not in the United States.
Note: This is a live stream video by Sayer Ji (from greenmedifno.com). It’s worth a look and a subscription.
References
- G Zhuang, M Shen, et al. Potential false-positive rate among the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ in close contacts of COVID-19 patients. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339770271_Potential_false-positive_rate_among_the_%27asymptomatic_infected_individuals%27_in_close_contacts_of_COVID-19_patients
- US Health and Human Services, NVSS. Vital statistics reporting guidance. Apr 3, 2020 https://www.scribd.com/document/455607875/US-HHS-Document-to-Doctors-on-How-to-Certify-COVID-19-Deaths-including-Related-Deaths?campaign=VigLink&ad_group=xxc1xx&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate
- M Rogers. Fact check: Hospitals get paid more if patients listed as COVID-19, on ventilators. USA Today. Apr 24, 2020. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/
- American Hospital Association. Senate passes the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. https://www.aha.org/special-bulletin/2020-03-26-senate-passes-coronavirus-aid-relief-and-economic-security-cares-act
- J Crump. California county will pay people diagnosed with coronavirus $1250 to stay home. Independent UK. Aug 7, 2020. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-california-alameda-county-stipend-stay-home-a9660536.html
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Underlying Cause of Death, 1999 – 2018 Request. https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D76;jsessionid=49999BFD95688972FC2D311081468CD0
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths and Mortality. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
I heard Pat Curran is living in a car in North County San Diego. When is the last time you got in the water?
I am finally going to unsubscribe to this newsletter after almost a decade. I loved reading Cosmic Banditos, In Search of Captain Zero, and many of your stories and writings. Starting with CYGAWA the satire, absurdism, and irony turned to darkness, anger, and conspiracy – everyone is out to get me. Your writings slowly turned from fun to anger, and you went from helping people to hurting people.
The world has been changing fast for many decades, many have been unable to deal with this change. Many Americans have lost hope, lost their careers, lost the American Dream, and have ended up with some combination of homeless, mental illness, addicted to alcohol, drugs, religion, racism, nationalism, hate of others, or deep conspiracy. I have lost many friends and family to these demons, especially in the surfing community we all have. You and the QAnnon folks have been tapping into this well, people need something to blame, something to make sense of the world, why things keep getting worse for them and their community. But there is no grand cabal, no global conspiracy, its just people making good and bad decisions, there is nobody driving this bus. There are good people that do bad things, there are bad people that do good things – that is where we are. The only thing that really matters in life is helping other and love. Get into the water and get baptized before it is over.
I really should use your comment as a lead-in to what’s really, at root, wrong with the world. I mean after 10 YEARS of reading my blog, you pick NOW — when it has to be obvious even to a low grade idiot that we’re under fire from a truly wicked, very long term plan carried out by forces of true evil — to decide that…
‘there is s no grand cabal, no global conspiracy, its just people making good and bad decisions, there is nobody driving this bus…’ and all will be fine if I just ‘Get into the water’…
In a sense, tho, you’re right. What’s wrong with the world is not so much the ‘grand cabal’ but self-centered, utterly shallow people like you, with which the planet is brimming. Fuck your discouragement and good riddance.
This is what I imagine a religious janitor who cleans the floors etc, and loves his job (and is sweating on losing it) at the Fed Reserve or IMF would write.
“The world has been changing fast for many decades” – or has it been changed?
I just leave this here, in YouTube land, they brought up the movie Escape from NY, 1981. In it, the towers, a plane crashing into a building, injetion, the wall, defunding the police…
Short montage linked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFrjBiwid9k
Today, Casey streamed the commented version.
You know, I think this a real lousy low as goes, misery guts wind up sent to Allan from the shittiest, meanest AI Bot model out there.
Robot called Walt, Allan is the only guy I have come across anywhere, to genuinely warn everyone of whats ahead, and to STOCK UP on food and essentials.
And that write up & kind story (of the many) he brought to us about buddy Peter Beard was absolutely fantastic and heart warming to say the least.
But robot heads like ‘Walt’ – who don’t give a damn about anything wouldn’t have read it, because it has to be a NWO robot to say this distracting BS junk above.
Still not done with the Beard matter. Even contacted RFK jr, who knew him well. No word back yet. Cops will not talk to me. Nor the family or other ‘friends’. Disappointing.
An unbelievable and sad state of affairs Allan.
We would love to hear more story from you about & around Peter B. – if you finally get some answers one day.
I bet this covid crap stopped a fitting celebration of his amazing life too.
Allan-
It seems that the numbers need to be checked.
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/there-pandemic
-Tim
Always, assuming one has the time. Certainly goes for the numbers from the MSM.
Let’s be real. I relied on you doing due diligence, then the article is pulled down by the author, and the links I tried to follow (Follow the facts, wherever they take you) do not let me SIFM. If I can’t access the data underlying the claim,I’m out, whether the claim is from MSM or another source.
Let’s see what happens but here is the note from the author:
by Colleen Huber, NMD
8/15/20 update from Dr. Huber:
“Unfortunately, I have to remove this [the article] paper for now.
Some diligent and astute researchers who read my paper have now directed me to data and pages on the CDC website that I had not previously seen, which will likely adjust numbers that I published.
My paper may have to be revised, and my revised paper will appear here when ready. Please know that many researchers are sorting through the data now, and will possibly post their information before mine is figured out. Thank you for your patience and continued interest in this topic.”
Visit for the original link and updated article when posted: https://www.primarydoctor.org/is-there-a-pandemic
Anyway, thanks for YOUR due diligence. Let’s see what happens.
I found interesting about the standard flu jab and severity of Covid… since there has been a recent massive push for flu jabs and other vaccines of late
https://homevaccineeducationnetwork.com/flu-vaccine-and-covid-19
I’ve posted this story and the both Pandemic videos to forums with large numbers of people who should, based on their purported backgrounds, be very interested. Very few take the time to watch the videos and those that do watch comment negatively. This story from GreenMedInfo gets more virulent reactions due to the source.
It’s like 9/11. People refuse to believe that anything so large in scale and evil could involve government. To believe it makes people lose their minds and question everything about their lives.
If GreenMedInfo analyzation is correct, Sayer Ji should be flooding alt media, MSM, and the town square with the news. Get it into the hands of some conservative media people (they are out there with huge followings) and let the news spread.
We need more than our numbers spreading the information.
Absolutely. I much appreciate your work in spreading the info. A lot of negative comments are a good sign. I suspect they contain no actual information. The usual.
Seems Aloon is more interested in holding onto his pre-formed opinions, y’all.
And hoping that Trump can save his skinny awwrse.
Good luck with that.
AJW: Yes, I support SOME aspects of QAnon, but that doesn’t mean I believe everything. You really are an annoying Azzhole. Christ.
He emails me frequently, yet deletes my posts. Go figure.
Thank you, Allan.
This 20 minute video has information that people might find interesting and relevant to larger Implications of technology and Big Business. Worth the time.
https://youtu.be/ywuCRVJVDqs
I’m really starting to like Tucker Carlson. He just needs to REALLY wake up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIGEO1Onypc
I sent this to my liberal crony Conrad, who thinks I support Trump and that Biden will save the country.
View the above and realize that Conrad has a demented old man (clinically demented) at the top of the ticket and the morons and freaks you see behind him. Did I mention he was a pedophile when he could still get it up?
Does anyone disagree that the DNC was an exercise in flat out insanity? Whoa, are we in trouble!
Allan,
I do not love Trump. I can tell on sight I wouldn’t like Mike Pence, that is to actually know him. But I still truly believe that voting matters, if only in the “lesser of two evils” sense. But I don’t actually think Trump is evil: people will be like, Oh, you’ve drunk the Kool-aid, as though he was leading a religious cult. But the Trump fans are seriously no more than on the level of a Wrestling fanatic. It serves as a reminder that not all of American can be comprised of East Coast Ivy-league educated academics. But what happened to the “liberal” side?? I was born in the 1980s, and have come to rather severe generalizations about a lot of Baby Boomers, immersed as I have been in a lot of their culture. (“Their” may not be technically true, as so much of it was actually contributed by people a few years older than the generally given birth years – ‘46 to ‘64.)
As you have known many of the “Ol’ RFK” crowd… I don’t know what else to call that social set, but damn, I mean listen to that guy’s speeches… he was smart! Again, what went wrong? Was it the Psychedelia?
As today goes, and I grew up
in a notoriously left-wing Midwest college zone, the opinion I have of liberals in general… is that they just flat-out can’t handle reality. Perfect example: when I was in high school, a civics class we were put into was fronted by a teacher, I believe of Spanish (in the European sense) descent, who literally couldn’t speak English in such a way as to communicate to students. It was a couple of weeks of this, surely not a word said by any of us to our parents (9th grade), and then she just fled! Then there was another woman teacher I had, a Mrs. Parsons, math teacher at this here large public high school for the past 40 years, and to whom most of
my classmates were regrettably
jovially nasty… she was clearly going through something Alzheimer’s-related, despite accurately putting up Algebra problems on the board. She lasted slightly past the first semester. These two instances happened IN THE SAME YEAR! 1999. Joe Biden is supposed to be going into something much more important. But, the programming we’re getting is hardly consistent or unilateral – and we CT’ers, myself included, tend to forget just how much incompetence rules the day within a lot of systems. I know now that I was at a public school which, at that point, must literally have been letting some teachers in without in-personal interviews. Biden won’t last a day in the president’s office – that is unless they literally can’t think to get him out of there. (I have seen it pointed out that he may also be likely to suffer some “personal tragedy” (sacrifice?) again, between then and now, damn blackmailed NWO puppet!)
I read your blog for your insights, not to track the news, yet I can honestly say that apart from an uncle of mine born in 1945, I don’t personally know any man of the Woodstock era who doesn’t make Joe Biden look like their true representative.
what comes to mind (thanks for the thoughtful words) is that I just finished RFK JR’s memoir ‘American Values’ and seriously recommend it. Gave me faith that his uncle and dad were what they seemed, a genuine exception. More than exceptional. As is he.
I think I solved the ‘waiting for moderation’ problem. If you have a valid comment you should be able to post it.
Nope, it still says ‘waiting for moderation’ now.
A catch 22 here, given… obviously.
I tried to put up some important proof videos (3 times) and it still says – Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Thanks Allan, I think you have fixed it 🙂
This study, based on data from The National Center for Health Statistics, contradicts the findings presented above.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768086
Riiight. Here’s the first sentence:
Excess Deaths From COVID-19 and Other Causes,
March-April 2020
The number of publicly reported deaths from coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) may underestimate the pandemic’s
death toll.
This is bullshit, disinformation from Big Pharma. We already know that deaths are EXAGGERATED, via the testimony of numerous doctors and whistle blowers. Check your info or don’t post it here.
Regardless of what you think about the first sentence, please consider the data analysis. This shows that we are not in fact seeing a “lower death rate” than in previous years. In fact, there is a significant spike in deaths during spring 2020. Whether or not you think the deaths are COVID-related, comparison of data from 2020 vs data from previous six years shows an increase in deaths.
I think that before you present findings of a particular study as “proof of fraud” (in order to satisfy your confirmation bias) you should look at other studies that might have very different results.
We are after the truth, aren’t we?
“please consider the data analysis” Exactly right BJW. That is where all commentary should be rooted.
You might do as you recommend. Who has the motive for lying? I suspect you are not awake to the severity of our situation and the lengths they will go to to keep up under control. Or please do your due diligence and compare the numbers in your comment. Just saying you believe different is fine but not useful.
For just counting deaths and all, BIG pharma is certainly interested in the outcome… Just look at all them companies supporting Dr. Weinberger financially and via fees. I doubt he has my best interest in mind.
I didn’t write this, the article did:
“Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Weinberger reported receiving grants from Pfizer and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI137093) and personal fees from Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Affinivax outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.”
You consider GreenMedInfo to be a reliable source of information?
Good point.
But the real issue with that study is this…
Excess deaths equaled the difference between observed and expected deaths and were summed across the 8 weeks to estimate total excess deaths.
They define expected deaths from ‘Poisson regression models’ – … We’ve seen model’s be entirely wrong (like Neil Ferguson’s expected UK and US deaths that started this whole Plandemic) before, now haven’t we.
“Expected deaths (and 95% CIs) for these same weeks were estimated by fitting a hierarchical Poisson regression model to the weekly death counts for the period of December 29, 2013, through February 29, 2020 (assembled from final data for 2014-20181 and provisional data for January 1, 2019, through February 29, 20202). The model with the optimal fit (Supplement) used a combination of harmonic functions to capture seasonality and adjusted for annual trends with a categorical year effect. The model allowed season and time trends to vary by state.”
Yes, the study used statistical methods to arrive at “expected deaths.” So what is your point?
I tend to believe the outlet that doesn’t have a motive for lying. If I have time to check I will but I time and history are barreling ahead…
Ahem, this is in response to Aloon deleting a very important post.
Scuse my manners,but he also sends very nasty emails.
Must be all the dope.
Car fatalities during plague have
increased in LA since May over last year
and haven’t let up…
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-14/traffic-deaths-speeding-los-angeles-coronavirus-pandemic-vision-zero
I agree an overall view in stats
Is good VS plum picking. No doubt
the science made virus is now in
need of a ptb science made vaccine.
No good news here. After all, the
science theory that we sprouted
out of the mucky muck, makes science
the new god/ptb to count on.
Maybe that’s what this is all about.
Exposure. Exposing everybody to make
up their minds over relying on science
being the Holy grail, or not.
Important point your first paragraph. Good work. answers at least one lame question.
This time next year America will be unrecognisable with a Trump dictator calling the shots. And not necessarily the Donald. Possibly Jared or Ivanka.
Why not Biden or a Harris calling the shots?
And what is Covid 2.0? Source please
ACW: hey, azzhole, you said you were gone from here. So be it.
Who is we brah?
Oohh, OOOH-kkaayyyy.
As Aloon kneels down and reaches toward my zipper,,,,
😂
You got it, grouchy pants.
Anyone who thinks a Biden or Harris presidency would be better than the Trump, whatever his semi-sociopathic salesman-like personality may be, is either seriously deluded, or just a Boomer with extreme emotional problems. Biden/Harris, put it this way:… “joggers”’ will literally be able to come to your house and murder you. It probably won’t be reported in the news, if the police even come… Anyone who has paid attention the last two months should know to expect more of the same under True Commies! Plus, JB has dementia, and there is video from C-Span 5 years ago of him being inappropriate towards sworn-in Senators’ daughters…
None of those mentioned will actually be calling the shots.
None of these references are peer reviewed or professionally refereed.
Back again, mary? I thought maybe you were gone. Anyway, you are lying.
The reference, link, leads to one California county paying people. Is it happening elsewhere?
The article references “direct financial incentives to patients for positive Covid 19 test results.” Being Canadian I am not familiar with this. Can anyone elucidate?
Do some searches. You can find this out on your own.
Interesting analysis Allan. Is there a way to separate illness related deaths from accident and violence caused deaths? In looking at the graph the last time the death rate was falling this fast and reached near this low was 2008 which coincides with a huge decrease in economic activity similar to what we are seeing now.
To be accurate one has to take into account the lack of deaths from traffic which was way down at the height of the lock down and deaths from industrial accidents which would be way down, deaths from sporting activities, while domestic violence related deaths would likely be up.
While no doubt the medical industry is classifying every death it can as Cov related, they can’t very well claim a motorcycle accident is due to a Corona virus.
Reread my comment. Just to be clear, I don’t think that overall death rate is an accurate measure. Illness related deaths would be.
There are less deaths from traffic and more deaths from suicides and other deaths from depression. I can’t find the study but it’s there. How about you yourself do a search for the answer so the rest of us don’t have to waste our time?
If you were paying attention you’d know that they CAN AND DO consider a traffic accident death to be from covid. Wake up.
I’ve been awake for a long time. Always open to other viewpoints. Right now in the middle of harvest ensuring a reliable supply of local organic food for my community. Got food rotting in the fields because I can’t hire labor at even 12-15 an hour because everyone is getting free money to have a fun summer not working. Not everyone has time to delve into the details. I can pay you in potatoes to do the research if that would help.
What do you want? An echo chamber? I asked a very well thought out and reasonable question. Not all of my analysis is correct and neither is yours.
Also, see Cat’s comment.
Hi Allan
When I was a Nurse in training (UK) we were told that when the Doctors went on strike the death rates went down. The death rates could certainly be down due to people not seeking medical treatment.
I really appreciate your posts. However, like you, I am frustrated that friends and family will not believe anything but the government line. Sadly I have seen much more intelligent people than me succumb to the mainstream media brainwashing.
Your first para has some extreme implications. I’d check that. No docs at all equals immortality??
Thanks Allan! Greenmedinfo and its founder Sayer Ji have also uploaded a shareable excerpt from Plandemic Indoctornation along with a link to stream and download the film for free: http://www.plandemicseries.com.
https://youtu.be/KjRxvYBIsGM
My Mac isn’t receiving so I suggest you all just ignore this jerk/troll/whatever. I can’t be constantly bothered with deleting his dumb-assedness.
Great post, Allan.
I’ve been wanting a succinct summation of the total death numbers,and this is the perfect article to show to people who are buying the official narrative.
How can you argue against total deaths being *lower* than non pandemic years?
Its ridiculous that anyone could support a complete shutdown of the economy and removal of our freedoms, based on the above numbers.
Combined with just looking around oneself, and noticing that people arent dying (let alone getting sick), how can the people stand for this injustice?
I like to point out the example of homeless people, as well.
Every day I drive through areas of Seattle where homeless people are everywhere.
These folks are not social distancing, not wearing masks, etc. Many are ill with other issues and substance abuse problems. They dont have health care or access to healthy food.
Basically, if this were a real pandemic, they’d all be dead by now. It would have spread like wildfire through these homeless camps,and every day I’d be seeing bodies everywhere and ambulances would be constantly be transporting bodies, both dead and/or sick.
None of this is happening.
If people would just look around them and open their damn eyes, they’d see.
If there was a true, global, deadly pandemic, the people wouldnt be arguing about masks or whether college football should go forward…they’d be freaking out, hiding in their homes, shooting anyone who came to their doorstep.
Really good point re the homeless. logan pointed this out too.
It’s not true, though. It is a popular myth.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/false-perception-of-covid-19s-impact-on-the-homeless/
But then there is this… so…. ? Not sure.
“ Coronavirus hasn’t devastated the homeless as many feared”
https://apnews.com/595410c64aff65fd0e053e9657e7f928
Yep,
We can find a “news” article to support just about any position we want to take on this whole virus situation.
That’s why I think it’s important for people to use their own eyes and brains, and look to what they can know best… what is happening in their own community.
Ask your friends and family, neighbors and co-workers how many people they know that have died of Coronavirus?
Go downtown in your city and talk to homeless people personally, to get a sense of how the virus has infected their community.
Use that information to determine for yourself if what is happening locally is enough to justify the “state of emergency” and “threat of imminent death” that is required to justify all the lockdowns, and shutdowns and fines and new laws.
Re: the homeless situation. I was just stating what I see here in Seattle. I drive and walk the streets of Seattle every day for my job. I see no signs that any sort of illness is effecting the homeless population here.
It’s not “proof” of anything, obviously… but combined with my other observations over the past 6 months, locally (I’m an “essential worker”, so have been out and about the entire time), I can come to some pretty firm conclusions based on first hand observation about the state of things in Seattle.
And it ain’t what we’ve been led to believe.
I’ll reiterate what I said in my comment above.
If there were truly a deadly pandemic, as bad as we have been led to believe, it would be *obvious* to everyone.
There wouldn’t be people in the grocery store, yelling at a non-mask wearer… the stores would be empty, cuz no one would want to risk… you know… dying.
The NBA and NFL wouldn’t be going forward with their seasons, and high profile athletes would be dying if they tried.
People wouldn’t need to be told to stay home… they would choose to do it on their own, and they would threaten violent harm to anyone who approached their home and put their family at risk.
Instead we have people out and about, at parks and stores and restaurants who apparantly believe a deadly pandemic can be stopped by cheap cloth over their mouth/nose and staying 6 feet away from others… and even though you know there will be people not wearing masks and getting too close to you, its ok, cuz…well…I’m not sure why.
my only conclusion is that people aren’t *really* scared for their lives afterall.
What does it tell you about people that they can go about their lives *pretending* to be scared for their lives and willing to have their businesses and economy destroyed and families and friends fractured, when they don’t even think their lives are at risk?
My point being that we are still learning about this brand new disease. What are you talking about? It went raging through the assisted living facilities in Seattle.
You made the point that there are conflicting “news” articles regarding the homeless situation, right?
I agreed with you and then suggested that the best way to be sure of the accuracy of the situation is for folks to investigate locally to discern what is true. (since there will *always* be conflicting news articles for us to consume)
I then gave the example of my own experience here in Seattle, regarding the homeless situation.
(for context, it directly pertains to your example of conflicting news articles regarding the homeless, and my suggestion to use first hand examples in your local environment to get closer to the truth than reading conflicting news articles)
To clarify… I think there is an influx of information out there regarding the coronavirus situation, and it is every person’s responsibility to ask questions and figure out for themselves how much the virus is effecting their local environment. This is because no one can truly know what is happening outside of their own environment.
Is what people see in their own environment enough to justify the massive, overreaching loss of liberty that we are dealing with?
Finally, I suggested that if there was a true, imminent threat of death for the populace, enough to enact an indefinite “state of emergency”, then what we would be seeing in our local environments would be clear evidence of an imminent threat of death.
There would be no need for arguing about the reality of the virus… because everyone would be being effected by it personally. We would all know people who had died, and we would all be scared for our lives.
the fact that people are out and about, feeling “safe” by wearing cloth masks and trying half heartedly to stay 6 feet away from each other… all while arguing with people who don’t agree with them about the virus, shows that people aren’t truly afraid of imminent death.
People who are truly afraid of imminent death don’t go out to stores and parks, looking for people to argue with. They stay home, hunker down, and don’t put themselves at risk by interacting with people in public.
I hope that clarifies my “point” for you.
I’m not sure what is so confusing about it.